Error: Service types have not been configured

Has anybody any ideas - I get this when I am trying to create an appointment in Collaboration?
Thanks in advance

Hi Phil,
Have you configured Collaboration ?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/cb6b4060a1181ce10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
In your repository, have you active collaboration services ?
Patricio.

Similar Messages

  • Two error - certificate validation operation took X milliseconds & Alternate access mappings have not been configured

    Dear all,
    I have two questions on my SP2013 standard (on premise). They are very usual and I can find lots of work around and resolutino on web. But I cannot fix my environment and I am looking for more detail explaination if possible.
    At the beginning, I found there are lots of Critical error log in my SP App server every 1-2 minutes:
    A certificate validation operation took X milliseconds and has exceeded the execution time threshold. If this continues to occur, it may represent a configuration issue.
    My system doesn't have Internet access. After some research it happened to be SharePoint certificate CRL checking issue:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2625048/en-us
    I applied BOTH resolustion but the error still throw.
    After more research, it seems Sharepoint will keep looking for
    http://crl.microsoft.com. Some discussion suggested to add a HOSTS line "127.0.0.1     crl.microsoft.com". I have added the line and now I see a new warning log:
    Alternate access mappings have not been configured.  Users or services are accessing the site
    http://domain.com with the URL
    http://127.0.0.1.  This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users.  If this is expected, add the URL http://127.0.0.1 as an AAM response URL.
    I guess Sharepoint is trying to contact http://crl.microsoft.com to retrieve the crl. How can I resolve both error? Why Microsoft have this design knowing that many Sharepoint site are sit within Intranet?
    Thanks a lot.
    Mark

    Anything in the CAPI log?  It shouldn't be going to the internet anymore.
    Do you have loopback disabled?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/sharepoint_foxhole/archive/2010/06/21/disableloopbackcheck-lets-do-it-the-right-way.aspx

  • Is it possible to locate iPad 4G+WiFi location if the services iCloud and Find My iPhone have not been configured.

    Hello! My IPAD 4G   Wi Fi was stolen in Kiev, 17.05.2011. Is it possible to locate its location if the services iCloud and Find My iPhone have not been configured.
    If it is possible what should I do to find it?
    I have already applied to the police. But I also heard that if you contact the company Apple, they can quickly find the iPad police. Is this true?

    No.
    Change your iTunes (Apple ID) password along with any other password that was stored in the iPod.  If any passwords are associated with credit cards, contact the CC company and get your card replaced (with a new number).  If any passwords are associated with a bank or any other savings institution, contact them also and discuss approprate action with them.
    The "Find my..." function is pretty much useless if the device is in the hands of a thief.  All that is necessary is for the thief to connect to any computer with iTunes and "Restore as new."
    The only real protection you have is with the personal information on the device rather than the physical device itself.  This requires action before the device is lost/stolen.  If the device has significant personal information, it should have a strong 8-digit (or longer) password AND be configured for automatic wipe in the event of ten consecutive incorrect password entries.

  • Some people cannot access the sharepoint site because of saying "Alternate access mappings have not been configured."

    i am having some strange behavior after some modification with AAM and IIS bindings. some people of my company are not able to access the share point site, they are getting "This page cannot be displayedr" and also getting following error:
    Alternate access mappings have not been configured.  Users or services are accessing the site https://sp.boardbooks.com with the URL http://192.168.48.236.  This may cause incorrect links to be stored
    or returned to users.  If this is expected, add the URL http://192.168.48.236 as an AAM response URL.  For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
    Any help will be appreciated!!

    I hope you had a look at these below forums, if not then please check once. Users has faced similar issues and the forum has the right answers. Check it out:
    Social MSDN
    SP Stack Exchange

  • Alternate access mappings have not been configured.

    Alternate access mappings have not been configured.  Users or services are accessing the site
    http://spwf01:84 with the URL
    http://10.168.3.26:84.  This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users.  If this is expected, add the URL
    http://10.168.3.26:84.
    as an AAM response URL.  For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
    why I am receiving these errors? even alternanet acess maping is configured
    adil

    error message is saying your AAM settings are not properly configured, May be you are trying to access site using the URL which is not registered in the AAM. usually when we trying to browse the site using IP address or Server name.
    check this post more detail:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/aea5a5c7-761b-4c49-89df-d313d52f1ee7/alternate-access-mapping-errors?forum=sharepointgenerallegacy
    Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

  • Strange Alternative access mappings have not been configured warning

    I have a SharePoint 2013 server.
    Created a Web Application https://root.domain.com
    Created a Root Site Sollection https://root.domain.com
    Created a Host Named Site Collection https://site1.domain.com
    This is all created with these PS commands:
    $dbname = "WSS_Content_Root"
    $pool = "Root"
    $name = "Root"
    $site = "https://site1.domain.com"
    $sitedb = "WSS_Content_Site"
    $poolacc = "domain\webappaccount"
    $owner = "domain\adminaccount"
    $root = "https://root.domain.com"
    #create web app.
    $ap = New-SPAuthenticationProvider –UseWindowsIntegratedAuthentication
    $wa = New-SPWebApplication -URL $root -DatabaseName $dbname –ApplicationPool $pool -Name $name -Port 443 -ApplicationPoolAccount (Get-SPManagedAccount $poolacc) -AuthenticationProvider $ap -SecureSocketsLayer
    #create empty root site coll.
    New-SPSite $root -Name 'Portal' -Description 'Portal on root' -OwnerAlias $owner -language 1033 -Template 'STS#0'
    #create database for host named site coll.
    New-SPContentDatabase $sitedb -WebApplication $root
    #create host named site coll.
    New-SPSite $site -OwnerAlias $owner -HostHeaderWebApplication $wa -Name "Home" –Template "STS#0" -Language 1033 -ContentDatabase $sitedb
    Now the problem:
    In the eventvwr i get a warning 8059
    Alternate access mappings have not been configured.  Users or services are accessing the site https://root.domain.com with the URL https://10.1.71.41.  This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users.  If this is expected, add
    the URL https://10.1.71.41 as an AAM response URL.  For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
    How can i resolve this warning, adding the IP as an AAM doesn't seem right.?
    Strange thing is that the warning talks about the ROOT and an IP as AAM.
    Please any guidance to fix this rather strange issue

    Hi,
    Using a Web App with no Header specified is good for Host Named Sitecollections(you will not need to add the url of every HNSC to every WFE IIS Binding manually). The IIS site of your web app will serve anything that comes on the IP interface, on same protocol
    and port. As shown in my screenshot it will accept http://<rootsiteUrl>:80, http://<ServerIP>:80,http://<HNSCurl>:80
    The cert. has nothing to do with this but maybe the LB /TMG is reaching the WFEs via https://<ServerIP> and it is generating this warning. However if there is no Host Header(in the web app) and no Host will be specified in the IIS so the requested
    https://<ServerIP> will be valid and will serve the root SC but it will generated the warning. You have to be sure that nothing is reaching the WFE by https://<ServerIP> and you will not generate the warning. 
    Here is simulation on my Dev env.

  • Error while Creating new Position-Data fields have not been filled (no. 5A135)

    Dear Consultants,
    My client using SAP HCM form 2008, now they want to create new positions to the existing system,
    To create new positions I am using T Code : PP03, while creating I am getting error "Date Fields have not been filled- Error Message No - 5A135", I want to create the positions valid from 01.04.2014. please do needful why this error is coming
    Regards,
    Naresh

    Hi,
    It is mandatory to give the org unit to which the position is being associated with.
    Give the org unit and try saving it.
    Thanks,
    Sriram

  • Identity Server has not been configured for this new user/group suffix

    Hi all
    I am having a problem trying to configure the Directory Server (5.2) for Messaging Server.
    My configuration is as follows:
    SJES Q12005
    Server 1 - Directory Server 5.2
    Server 1 - Access Manager (formerly Identity Server)
    Server 1 - Web Server 6.1
    I have successfully installed the above and can login to Access Manager.
    I next installed Calendar & Messengar Server on "Server 1". Upon running "comm_dssetup.pl" from /opt/SUNWcomds/sbin, I get the following error:
    "Identity Server has not been configured for this new user/group suffix"
    Copy and paste of what I entered:
    bash-2.05# perl comm_dssetup.pl
    Welcome to the Directory Server preparation tool for
    Sun Java(tm) System communication services.
    (Version 6.3 Revision 1.0)
    This tool prepares your directory server for use by the
    communications services which include Messaging, Calendar and their components.
    The logfile is /var/tmp/dssetup_20050830165940.log.
    Do you want to continue [y]:
    Please enter the full path to the directory where the Sun ONE
    Directory Server was installed.
    Directory server root [var/opt/mps/serverroot] : /opt/mps/serverroot
    Please select a directory server instance from the following list:
    [1] slapd-sunldap
    Which instance do you want [1]:
    Please enter the directory manager DN [cn=Directory Manager]: cn=DirMan
    Password:
    Detected DS version 5.2
    Will this directory server be used for users/groups [Yes]:
    Please enter the Users/Groups base suffix [dc=samplecompany-dev,dc=co,dc=uk] : ou=infrastructure,o=sampletown,dc=samplecompany-dev,dc=co,dc=uk
    There are 3 possible schema types:
    1 - schema 1 for systems with iMS 5.x data
    1.5 - schema 2 compatibility for systems with iMS 5.x data
    that has been converted with commdirmig
    2 - schema 2 native for systems using Identity Server
    Please enter the Schema Type (1, 1.5, 2) [1]: 2
    Identity Server has not been configured for this new user/group suffix
    You can opt to continue, but you will not be able to use
    features that depend on Identity Server
    Are you sure you want this schema type? [n]:
    I have entered my user group suffix exactly as specified during the Access Manager install (hence I am able to login as "amadmin").
    Looking at the LDAP logs to try and figure out whats going wrong I see its not getting hits on all searches it is performing:
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=159 msgId=161 - SRCH base="ou=services,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-
    dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry)))(obj
    ectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscapeServer)(objectClass=netscape
    Resource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=159 msgId=161 - RESULT err=4 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=160 msgId=162 - ABANDON targetop=NOTFOUND msgid=161
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=161 msgId=163 - SRCH base="ou=people,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-de
    v,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry)))(objec
    tClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscapeServer)(objectClass=netscapeRe
    source)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=161 msgId=163 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=0 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=162 msgId=164 - SRCH base="ou=clientdata,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforc
    e-dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry)))(o
    bjectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscapeServer)(objectClass=netsca
    peResource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=162 msgId=164 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:18 +0100] conn=299 op=163 msgId=165 - ABANDON targetop=NOTFOUND msgid=164
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:20 +0100] conn=299 op=164 msgId=166 - SRCH base="ou=services,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-
    dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry))" attrs="objectClass numSubordinates ref aci"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:20 +0100] conn=299 op=164 msgId=166 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=41 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:28 +0100] conn=299 op=165 msgId=167 - SRCH base="ou=services,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-
    dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=0 filter="(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry))" attrs="objectClass numSubordinates ref aci"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:28 +0100] conn=299 op=165 msgId=167 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:28 +0100] conn=299 op=166 msgId=168 - SRCH base="ou=services,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-
    dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(objectClass=ldapsubentry)))(obj
    ectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscapeServer)(objectClass=netscape
    Resource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="objectClass numSubordinates ref aci"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=166 msgId=168 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=41 etime=1
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=167 msgId=169 - SRCH base="ou=iplanetamauthservice,ou=services,ou=infrastructure,o=n
    orthampton,dc=dataforce-dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(objectC
    lass=ldapsubentry)))(objectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscapeServ
    er)(objectClass=netscapeResource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=167 msgId=169 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=168 msgId=170 - ABANDON targetop=NOTFOUND msgid=169
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=169 msgId=171 - SRCH base="ou=iplanetamauthldapservice,ou=services,ou=infrastructure
    ,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)(obj
    ectClass=ldapsubentry)))(objectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=netscape
    Server)(objectClass=netscapeResource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=169 msgId=171 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=170 msgId=172 - ABANDON targetop=NOTFOUND msgid=171
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=171 msgId=173 - SRCH base="ou=iplanetampolicyconfigservice,ou=services,ou=infrastruc
    ture,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(objectClass=*)
    (objectClass=ldapsubentry)))(objectClass=referral)(objectClass=organization)(objectClass=organizationalUnit)(objectClass=nets
    capeServer)(objectClass=netscapeResource)(objectClass=domain))" attrs="dn"
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=171 msgId=173 - RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=172 msgId=174 - ABANDON targetop=NOTFOUND msgid=173
    [30/Aug/2005:16:41:29 +0100] conn=299 op=173 msgId=175 - SRCH base="ou=iplanetamauthenticationdomainconfigservice,ou=services
    ,ou=infrastructure,o=northampton,dc=dataforce-dev,dc=co,dc=uk" scope=1 filter="(|(&(numSubordinates=*)(numSubordinates>=1)(|(
    --More--(83%)
    The list goes on.
    Can anyone give me any pointers?
    Thanks

    Hi
    Thanks for your reply!
    I did mis-type, my mistake - sorry about that.
    If I dont over-ride the default it works, I've pretty much got the whole setup working now but I'm not particularly over the moon about the way the ldap tree is setup, I'd like finer granuality as we are going to attempt to get syncronization working with AD.
    I have an idea about how I'd like to set up our Mail/Calendar/LDAP infrastructure the 2nd time around (I'm just testing at the mo) - so I might have a question or two for you if you dont mind taking a look when you have a minute?
    Thanks Jay

  • Items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info

    Hi, expert
    I want to make  vendor payment  through F-53 after fill the detail when i click on open item process & double click on amount it gives an error 1 items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info
    regards
    gk

    Dear Kumar
    The relevant withholding tax types change, for example, as a result of legal changes. A withholding tax type is relevant if the following conditions apply:
    1. The withholding tax type is entered in the SAP master record of the business partner and indicated as subject to withholding    tax (vendor).
    2. The company code is indicated as authorized to deduct tax for vendors or as subject to withholding tax for customers for this withholding tax type (withholding tax data for company code: View V_T001WT)
    3. The posting date is in the validity period for the deduction authorization (withholding tax data for company code View V_T001WT).
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • Error in ESS Claims: Field outlook cahracetrs have not been maintined

    Dear Experts,
    We are having an error in the ESS qualty ..in the Reimbursement and claims screen. When we click on this link we are getting a warning message "Field outlook cahracetrs have not been maintined".Only default reimbursement types LTA and Medical allowance are appearing in the drop down for reimbursement type. All the paroll allowance groupings and claims configuration have been done. Please let us know the possible cause for the error.
    Note: The problem persists in Quality but working fine in Sandbox

    Any inputs??

  • Error in Claims screen: Field outlook cahracetrs have not been maintined

    Dear Experts,
    We are having an error in the ESS qualty ..in the Reimbursement and claims screen. When we click on this link we are getting a warning message "Field outlook cahracetrs have not been maintined".Only default reimbursement types LTA and Medical allowance are appearing in the drop down for reimbursement type. All the paroll allowance groupings and claims configuration have been done. Please let us know the possible cause for the error.
    Note: The problem persists in Quality but working fine in Sandbox.

    Thanks for your reply vijay.
    But in that case, if any note application is required, then how come its working fine in Sandbox.
    But i am not encountering this error in sandbox.

  • Calendar Server Error: At least one sharee was not recognized by the server. New invitations have not been sent.

    I deployed a Mountain Lion Server with the calendar service active. Every time a user tries to share a calendar they have created under thier account to an external person using thier email address, the server gives the following error: "At least one sharee was not recognized by the server. New invitations have not been sent."
    Invites to share a calendar to OD accounts on the server seem to work fine.
    I have a calendar specific email address for external invites set up. The server seems to send individual event invites to external email addresses just fine, so I am thinking the email is working. Email is not served on the Mountain Lion Server. The account is through Google Apps using IMAP and SMTP.
    What's even stranger, is that there doesn't seem to be any message in the Calendar error logs.
    I've tried creating a new test account and no luck.
    I don't know what else to try.
    Thanks in advance for any help!

    another 3rd party sofwtare that allows you opent he backup and grab info
    http://www.processtext.com/abcblackberry.html
    trial for 30 days, good program for that 30 days, I hear they arent a pleasant company to purchase from though

  • Managed system configuration: Some required roles have not been granted

    Hi experts,
    I face a strange problem in my SolMan 7.1 SPS 4:
    In the configuration of managed system everything is green except the last step "Check configuration" => "Configuration Check".
    The error is:
    Some required roles have not been granted to user SAPSUPPORT  (ID: MANAGED.DUAL.SAPSUPPORT)
    Action: Execute step Managed System Configurationn / Create Users
    Check Context: Managed systems users/roles | Managed users/roles | SYSTEM =LSM~ABAP
    and the same for SMDAGENT_xyz (ID: MANAGED.ABAP.WILYAGT).
    The funny thing is that the step no. 7 (Create users) is done successfully. I have also deleted SAPSUPPORT manually and have reexecuted step 7 but no success.
    Any ideas? Thanks and best regards, Basti

    Hello,
    Just a thought... it could be due to a UME role that is not assigned to the user. Have you checked the security guide?? There are a couple of steps to do in Visual Admin for this use as per the guide.
    Cheers,
    Diego.

  • HT4872 I have not been able to import contacts from google or my android to my new I-phone 5. This article helps to a point until error message "cannot create account" already exist is received. Please help.

    I have not been able to import contacts from google or my android to my new I-phone 5. This article helps to a point until error message "cannot create account ... already exist" is received. Please help.

    -Reece,
    We only have 1 single domain, 1 domain forest, no subdomains, only alias. I had replied to the other post as well. But I am happy to paste it here in case anyone want to read it.
    So, after a few months of testing, capture and sending logs back and forth to Apple Engineers, we found out there is a setting in AD, under User Account that prevent us to log into AD from Mountain Lion. If you would go to your AD server, open up a user account properties, then go to Account tab, the "Do not require Kerberos preauthentication" option is checked. As soon as I uncheck that option, immediately I was able to log into AD on the Mac client. Apple engineers copied all my AD settings and setup a test environment on their end and match exact mine AD environment. They was able to reproduce this issue.
    The bad part about this is... our environment required the "Do not require Kerberos preauthentication" is checked in AD, in order for our users to login into some of our Unix and Linux services. Which mean that it is impossible for us to remove that check mark because most, if not all of them some way or another require to login into applications that run on Unix and Linux. Apple is working to see if they can come up with a fix. Apparently, no one has report this issue except us. I believe most of you out there don't have that check mark checked in your environment... Anyone out there have any suggestion to by pass or have a work around for this?

  • Error:-They have not been assigned  to VMS role

    Hi.
    When i enter t Code VELO it shows me error
    "They have not been assigned  to VMS role"
    this error was not there when there was no configuration.
    Reg,
    Amol

    Hi,
    As far as I know, you need to maintain business org details (like org name, positions, business partners etc) in the ppoma_crm tcode. Then have to assign a position to your user ID. This assigns the business role as well.
    This link should be helpful:
    http://www.sapcrmsecurity.com/SAP%20CRM%20Business%20Role.html
    Regards,
    Srikishan

Maybe you are looking for