Error states ''Putaway in storage section SSA is not allowed''.

Edited by: Sunny on Sep 11, 2008 10:26 AM

Hi
You need to check that you have the correct strategies set up for storage sections and for storage bins and for storage unit types that they are allowed to go where you are trying to put them
Frenchy

Similar Messages

Putaway in storage section 100 is not allowed

hi,
I am facing a problem
while creatin a TO i am getting an error Putaway in storage section 100 is not allowed
All the strategy for the patricular storage type and the storage section is maintained in the config.
Thanks in Advance
Sunil

your target storage bin has a storage section 100 assigned.
your material master has a storage section indicator.
In OMLZ (storage section search) find the record for your warehouse and storage type having the storage section indicator from your material master, and check into what storage sections (below 1..., 2...., 3,,,) you can putaway the stock.

Putaway in storage section PA1 is not allowed

Hello,
While creating TO against TR in LT04 system is giving error message as above said in subject line.
I have checked in LX20 and LS04 bins are there even though still getting same error.
Please let me know what could be the reasion and solution for this issue.
Thanks in advance.

you get this error if the storage section check is made active in customizing transaction OMLZ
here you first define one or more storage section indicators (also named storage area indicator).
then you define a storage section search per combination of warehouse and storage type and storage section indicators and assign the possible storage section for this combination.
in the storage bins (LS01N) you enter the storage section to which this bin belongs.
in the material master you enter the storage section indicator
if a bin is determined which has a storage section that is not among the listed storage sections from the storage section search then the error you have is issued.

Error Addition to stock of material A in storage type 002 is not allowed

Dear all,
I am doing GR for PO in WM. During TO creation I am getting this error Addition to stock of material A in storage type 002 is not allowed. Hence no storage bins can be entered. May I know under what scenarios this type error props up?
Thanks in advance,
Prashanth

Please find the explanation in SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f8449d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
SPRO > LE > WM > Master Data > Define Storage Type
Check
- putaway strategy --> V_T3010-STEIN
- addition to existing stock indicastor ---> V_T3010-ZULAG
As you can read in the help, other factoers such as capacity may influence this.
Regards,
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 19, 2010 7:55 AM

Error: State cannot be saved as variables are not submitted in WAD (Portal)

Hi Gurus,
I am getting the following error :
After opening the report and selecing the free characteristics if I want to go back one screen by right click(context menu)-> Back->Back one Navigation Step it is throwing the following below short dump in the EP portal,please help ASAP:
The initial exception that caused the request to fail was:
Error: State cannot be saved as variables are not submitted
Currently I am on support pack 17.
Thanks to all.

hi sunita,
please check ur bi java pack,
BIJava patch SPS16p30 fixes the problem,
such problem can be solved by upgrading java patched.
hope it will help u.
thanks.

Error in Creation of Object ID 00000000 is not allowed

Hi all,
When I am Hiring an employee using PA40, I am getting an error as "Creation of Object ID 00000000 is not allowed", when I save it.
In the NUMKR Feature, the return value has been assigned to the Personnel Sub Area.
Pls. can anybody explain, how can I solve this problem.
This is urgent requirement of client.
Thanks,
HR User.

Hi Hr user
Now listen carefully.
1. If you have defined your feature NUMKR according to PSA then while running hiring action does PSA comes or it just gives you the Position, PA, EG and ESG fileds only.
2. If the first condition is true then you will get the error, now the question is why
Answer, you have defined the feature through PSA and once you try to save the IT0000 there is no PSA mentioned there thats why the system gives you the error.
If this explnanation is understood by you than reply , i will tell you how you can bring the PSA field also in hiring action at IT0000.
Do reply
Regards,
Bhupesh Wankar

Error message MH 175 "The listing end is not allowed to be in the past"

Hi,
While I try to execute listing in the new article creation using particular disctribution chain, i.e. with reference to a Sales Org and distribution channel, the error message MH 175, 'The listing end is not allowed to be in the past' popped up. Can you please help me on what could be the cause for this error to be displayed.
thank you
regards
prahlad

Hi,
Go to mm42.. enter the article number and distribution chain and then select the Listing View.... Please check the "Listed to" and "for Sale till" date is in past. if so change the date to future and try agian.
Regards
GK

ERROR MESSAGE : display of the query spec is not allowed

Hi all,
I have many queries built under a multiprovider. The problem is if i try to chane a query it is not allowing me to do it. Even for a query which i built it is not allowing. It is displaying an error message 'display of the query spec is not allowed'.
Can anyone help me in understanding this issue?
Thanks,
Raj.

Have you check your authorizaiton trace with ST01?
You need authorization for this query in auth obj S_RS_COMP or S_RS_COMP1

ERROR ITMS-9000: "index_split_000.html(257): attribute "name" not allowed here; expected attribute "accesskey", "charset", "class", "coords", "dir", "href", "hreflang", "id", "rel", "rev", "shape", "style", "tabindex", "target", "title", "type" or "xml:la

I have all these errors, can anyone help with this all means? trying to get my book published in iBooks. Nedd your help. Thanks, Jo
ERROR ITMS-9000: "index_split_000.html(257): attribute "name" not allowed here; expected attribute "accesskey", "charset", "class", "coords", "dir", "href", "hreflang", "id", "rel", "rev", "shape", "style", "tabindex", "target", "title", "type" or "xml:lang"" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
Use of the block quote element can cause ePubecheck to give the error "text not allowed here". Text must not be alone inside of a body tag and if it is not enclosed in some other block level tag, this may lead to the error you are receiving.

I have all these errors, can anyone help with this all means? trying to get my book published in iBooks. Nedd your help. Thanks, Jo
ERROR ITMS-9000: "index_split_000.html(257): attribute "name" not allowed here; expected attribute "accesskey", "charset", "class", "coords", "dir", "href", "hreflang", "id", "rel", "rev", "shape", "style", "tabindex", "target", "title", "type" or "xml:lang"" at Book (MZItmspBookPackage)
Use of the block quote element can cause ePubecheck to give the error "text not allowed here". Text must not be alone inside of a body tag and if it is not enclosed in some other block level tag, this may lead to the error you are receiving.

I receive an error in Firefox 4.0 Beta 11: Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection. Renegotiation is not allowed on this SSL socket. (Error code: ssl_error_renegotiation_not_allowed) Anyone know how to fix this?

I have installed the Firefox 4.0 Beta 11 (+updates), I try to connect to our https: website and I receive the following error:
Secure Connection Failed An error occurred during a connection.
Renegotiation is not allowed on this SSL socket.
(Error code: ssl_error_renegotiation_not_allowed)
I have installed this certificate on Firefox 3.6.13 and I am able to connect to our HTTPS site but it will not work with the Beta 4.0 11

I read about this for ages. I had problems setting up a certificate for my online banking. This one solution genuinely worked for me (finally!) ...Fingers crossed it will for you too:
1) In the address bar type in '''about:config''' ...Firefox will say it's dangerous, but I just went ahead anyway lol - It's fine. Thank god there's always an edit-undo!
2) Copy and paste this into the ''filter'' at the top: '''security.ssl.allow_unrestricted_renego_everywhere'''
3) Then change ''false'' to ''true'' (I think I just clicked it, and it changed)
That's it! Refresh your bank page, and it should work!
(Spanish source: '''http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fedora-ve.org%2F2011%2F09%2F14%2Ferror-error-code-ssl_error_renegotiation_not_allowed-en-firefox-4-x.html&act=url''')

8600 printer in an error state message -- will print from Mac but not from my pc

We have two computers wirelessly connected to my hp 8600. The Mac prints fine, but recently I started receiving error messages when I try to print from my desktop PC: "Printer in an error state" I have tried unplugging from the wall, turning on and off, rebooting, so far nothing helping.

Samsdad wrote:
But I had done that when I first set up my printer. And it worked up until a couple days ago. Don't know what changed.
Then try look at these tips to see if these can figure the problem?
Wireless printing center
Common fixes for wireless connectivity issues
I Can't Find the WEP or WPA Key or Password for My Wireless Network
HP Wireless printing center
I am a Volunteer to help others on here-not a HP employee.
Replies aren't online 24/7 because of Time Zone differences.
Remember in this Day and Age of Computing the Internet is Knowledge at your fingertips if you choose understand it. -2015-

Error: GR "Goods receipt for purch. order" is not allowed (ORD 4000048)

Hi gurus, can anyone please help me
while doing service entry for the PO with account assignment F and Item Category D
our client is facing the error
"Goods receipt for purch. order" is not allowed (ORD 4000048) MSG no: BS007
Diagnosis
The current status of object 'ORD 4000048' prohibits business transaction 'Goods receipt for purch. order'.
Procedure
To process business transaction 'Goods receipt for purch. order', you first have to change the status of object 'ORD 4000048' to allow the transaction 'Goods receipt for purch. order'.
This gives you an overview of the system and user statuses that affect the transaction. A transaction can only be executed if there is at least one status that allows it and there is no status that forbids it.
Anyone can give the solution please
Guruk

hi dear all
Really thanks for your prompt reply.
i solved this issue, as what u said, it is not released in IW31, at the time of PR creation. So i asked the User to go to IW32 anc choose the apprpriate order and change mode and click on Flag Icon to release.
Any way i awarded points for your support
Thanks
regards
Guru

Update error: POL - 4008 null buffer for attribute is not allowed

I am attempting to update a column in my Oracle Lite database through JDBC.
The statement is:
ds = getDataSource();
conn = getConnection(ds);
stmt = getStatement(conn);
int results = stmt.executeUpdate("UPDATE SYSTEM.PM_PASSENGERS SET CURRENT_STATUS_EVENT_ID = 267 WHERE PASSENGER_ID = 1");
System.out.println(results+" rows affected.");
conn.commit();
which results in the message:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 rows affected.
[POL-4008] null buffer for attribute is not allowed
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am not sure what that means exactly. Does that mean there is some problem with the commit?
Thanks,
Allen

Is it necessary to update the entire record in Oracle Lite, or should it be possible to update select columns only when performing an update query?
Thanks,
Allen

Error message KI089: Substitution of settlement senders is not allowed

Hi ALL,
To meet the demand of the company, was created a substitution (OKC9) to replace the field value COBL-AUFNR through a user-exit. However, when performing the process that calls the exit in question (transaction KO88) is shows the error message KI089 (Substitution of settlement is not allowed senders).
Searching the SAP Support Portal could see that there is a note to resolve this problem (SAP Note 317894), but this note would not be valid for SAP ECC 6.0.
Does anyone know whether it applies to SAP ECC 6.0? I think it's the only solution to solve the reported problem.
Regards
Kelson Marcos

Hi
I believe the sender should never be substituted. If you posted values to an Order, the same should receive a credit upon settlement. Else, it negates the whole concept of settlement
I referred to the note you mentioned. What I perceived is you cant substitute a sender during settlement and thats right as per my knowledge
Ajay M

Error "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed"

Dear experts,
once again SAPs workflow environment drives me crazy with mysterious error messages.
Some time ago I posted a question here concerning the problem that I cannot put back a workitem by using function module SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM due to a lock on this workitem which has been set right after it has been double clicked in the business workplace workflow inbox:
[How can I put back a workitem before I'm back in the business workplace?;
Since I do not want to dequeue the lock for the workitem in my application (where the user finds the appropriate detail information along with the function buttons for approval, rejection and F3/BACK) I tried it with calling a POPUP_TO_CONFIRM ("Do you want to put back the workitem?") directly from within the BO-method, right after returning from the FM that called my application. From here (the popup then shows in front of the business workplace instead of the application) the locking doesn't seem to be a problem any more! But whatever I do after the users decision to put the WI back - calling the FM SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM or trying to leave the method with macro EXIT_CANCELLED - leads to the error message "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed" and the workitem changes to status ERROR, too. This message seems to be bull***t, since the status of the item is supposed to go back to READY.
Does anybody have experience to help me on that ?
Thanks in advance
regards
Andreas

Hello Andreas,
Ah, sorry, there was so much talk about user decisions that I assumed you were using a standard decision task.
Still, I would be extra careful of changing the way workflow usually works because you have an unknown target audience that are based on the standard.
The standard SAP philosophy is quite simple: cancel/F3 or do nothing and it stays reserved. If you do not want it reserved, you need to perform an action. This is based on a majority of processes: in most cases when you execute a work item you will also be the one who is going to completed it. Replacing it is the lesser used of the two alternatives, therefore it is the only one that requires an action on the part of the user.
Again, this is intended as constructive input. Strange quirks and unusual behaviour tend to add a black mark to software if they do not make things easier to use. In many environments users are not even aware of the reserve/replace business, so there you would be adding an additional layer of complexity.
Personally I would find an exit popup annoying as a regular workflow user - regular decisions can be approved with one click, or I can back out with a single click if I need to make a phone call or look up some info before approving - but with this new-fangled thing I've got an extra button to click and an extra thing to think about. This is especially the case in a payment approval scenario where you may have users in some departments who may approve hundreds of payments each week.
My suggestion would be to leave it like that. By all means put an option into the user decision to put it back or to 'un-reserve' it (and loop round if the user chooses it). That way you are adding value and not clicks.
Cheers,
Mike

Error states ''Putaway in storage section SSA is not allowed''.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for