Error when doing two step transfer between Plants with split valuation

Hi expert,
I´ve activated split valuation for Material X , it has three Valuation types ( NEW, REPAIR and DAMAGE ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
Message no. M7048
Diagnosis
In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
Procedure
Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

Hi,
What do you mean with "inconcistent to my storage type definition?", is that mean i can process two step transfer without using PO/delivery process or one-step movement? coz according to business requirement, we must use two step transfer considering to the distance between plants is so far and we want to make it the simple way so that PO/Delivery process isn't better solution. I think, this is an standard procedure all company over the world can use but just the reason of split valuation the system can't execute the transaction.
Is there any config i miss to? is there any user exit i can use for this requirement? please help me..
thanks,
AJ

Similar Messages

Stock transfer between plants for split valuated materials

Hi,
I'm doing a stock transfer between plants without STO.
The FG's are split valuated,which are transferred from central warehouse to other warehouse at different states.
I'm trying to use mvt type 303 and 305 to transfer the FG.
But getting error "Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation".
Please suggest how to achieve the requirement.
Is it possible to make 303 mvt type document to be parked and posted.
Regards,
Venkatesh

<< Moderator message - Cut and paste response from Error when doing two step transfer between Plants with split valuation removed and points unassigned. Plagiarism is not allowed in SCN >>
Refer below link with same issue discussed,
[two step transfer with split valuation |Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?]
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 3, 2012 11:30 AM

Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?

Hi people , i´ve activated split valuation for MaterialX , it has two Valuation types ( Production and Purchase ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
Message no. M7048
Diagnosis
In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
Procedure
Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, considering that having to create a transfer order for each movement will duplicate work and using a one step transfer won´t be practical. I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

First of all , thanks everyone for the help.
Csaba Szommer, Kunal ingale , i read the OSS note and the pdf and indeed everything confirms it´s not possible to do the two step movement. So , i tried the stock transport order and something else appeared here. When creating this type of order , the system first ask for a Supplying Plant , then you can populate the material , quantity and the destination plant. But then it asks for the Valuation Type of the material involved, and it seems this field is Mandatory . Is it possible to make this field on the transport order as optional ? I couldn´t find this field at SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Define Screen Layout at Document Level .
I need this field to be optional for the following reason. In my company there´s a relation between two plants , Plant A ( from where products are dispatched to the customer ) and Plant B ( where the material is produced with valuation type "Production" and sometimes is buyed from vendors with valuation type "Purchase" ) . The idea is to run an MRP which will generate the material needs on Plant A considering the Sales Orders. This need will be then transformed (automatically by MRP ) in Stock Transport Orders with Supplying Plant "Plant B" and receiving "Plant A". The problem here is that , at the moment of the transport order creation it´s no possible to know which will be the valuation type of the material that will satisfy the need. I mean , Plant B ( production and buying plant ) will check the list of needs for Plant A and then will decide which material ( with which Valuation Type ) they will provide considering the actual stock levels at the time of the MRP run.
In a few words, i see the only way to do a two step transfer of a split valuated material is using Stock Transport Orders , is there a way to make the field "Valuation Type" optional ?. The idea would be to choose the Valuation Type of the material at the moment of the Good Issue. Thanks a lot , once again.
Edited by: Christian Len on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM

Stock Transfer between plants two steps.

DearAll,
We are using the scenario stock transfer between plants two steps.in the source plant we are issueing the goods with on 303 movement in MIGO with Remove from storage option. in the receiving plant we are receiving the goods with refernce to 303 material document in MIGO with place in storage option.
we are using the version SAP 4.7.
my problem is at the time of goods receipt SAP is allowing to the posting date less than the source plant 303 document date. it should allow the posting date as Greater than equal to source plant document date at the time of GR.
Any standard pracktise is there.
for example source plant 303 document date is 08.06.2009 wrongly i have entered the receiving plant 305 document posting date as 06.06.2009 it is allowing to post it is not throw any information. it should not allow to know.
i want to control this. any standard controls is there. kindly help.
Regards
P.Anandhakumar
Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Jun 9, 2009 10:46 AM

Except user exit , Is it possible any standard functionality.?
why SAP not controlled this?.
this is SAP bug or not?. kindly clarify..
Regards
P.Anandhakumar....

Two-step procedure(between 2 plants)

Hi
the doc. states
"The approaches to the entry of plant-to-plant stock transfers for the one-step and two-step procedures without a stock transport order correspond to those for storage-location-to-storage-location transfers."
can I infer , that in a the case of the two-step procedure
(between 2 plants), there are 2 material documents generated and 2 accounting docs., too. ?
Thanks

During Two Step transfer it will create two material doc as below
1.An item for the removal from storage at the issuing plant
2.An item for the placement into stock in transfer at the receiving plant.
If the plants belong to different valuation areas, an accounting document is created parallel to the material document for the removal from storage, because the stock is transferred from one plant into another.
Upon placement into storage at the receiving plant, the system again creates a material document.
For every item you enter, only one material document item is created, because the quantity is only transferred from stock in transfer into unrestricted-use stock at the receiving point
Since the transfer posting from stock in transfer to unrestricted-use stock occurs within the plant, an accounting document is not created in addition to the material document.

What is Cycle or steps to create Stock transfer between plants.

What is Cycle or steps to create Stock transfer between plants.
Reply with T Codes & Justify

Hello RM
We can transfer stocks within a company code between 2 plants using 3 methods:
1) Using single step simple stock transfer (Mvt Type 301).
2) Using two step stock transfer (Mvt Types 303 and then 305).
3) Using a stock transport order(STO) again it is based on 2 things:
a) r u using STO with delivery or
b) without delivery.
Though the first two steps are very simple to process but using STO has its own advantages: 1) Quantity in transit can be monitored 2) delivery costs can be entered in the STO.
First 2 steps (single step and 2 step plant to plant transfer) can be done using MIGO tcode , selecting stock transfer and entering the relevant mvt types.
would like to tell you about STO as it is an important process.
STO without delivery, the following functions are provided to support the Internal Stock Transfer without Delivery :
#Create Stock Transport Order
#Post goods issue for stock transport order
#Post goods receipt for stock transport order
Config Step required before processing above steps:
Setting Up Stock Transport Order: Purchasing Document Type, the purpose of this activity is to specify which document type is to be used for a certain combination of supplying (issuing) plant and receiving plant.
Path go to SPRO--MM-Purchasing---PO-Set up STO-----assign doc type, one step procedure, underdelivery tolerances.
There you have to enter your supplying and receving plant with the Purchasing doc type( UB).
Now the process:
1) Receiving plant will create a STO towards issuing plant.
2) Issuing plant will transfer material from their unrestricted use stock to stokc in transit using mvt type 351.
3) Receiving plant receives the goods using MIGO mvt type 101.
Regards
Yogesh

SD billing document (transfer between plants) error in document splitting

Dear Gurus.
I have the following scenario.
New GL activated
Zero balance on Profit Center.
SD billing document is created after the shipping of material (internal transfer) between 2 plants belonging to the same company code.
I have several user exits activated and they are not well documented if activated.
Case1.
The billing document is usually created with materials populated with the same Profit Center.
In Tr VF01/VF02 the function: Release for Accounting is executed and no accounting document is created (OK cause they belong to the same company code), this function is just closing the cycle of the billing document to set the status as completed.
Case2.
Billing document containing several materials with more than one Profit Center
During the execution of the function: Release for accounting the following error is gotten: Position 1 is not populated with Profit Center - apparently caused by the splitting rule - financial document creation - the status of the billing document is not set to Completed, is kept as opened.
As I commented In case 1 I do not have any accounting document (no error message)
Doubt 1
Is it possible that the splitting rule is being checked even though no accounting document is created (remember billing in a scenario of material transfer between plants belonging to the same company code)?
Apparently in case 1 I do not have any error cause the splitting rule is deriving the profit center in a passive basis: Inheritance.
In the other way, in case 2 the splitting rule is trying to derive the profit center in an active basis. In my configuration I actually do not have any configuration for the combination of transaction, variant, position to be derived, position basis.
Doubt 2.
Is this the standard behavior of SAP?
Could this be caused by a user exit not identified?
thanks in advance for any advice provided
Regards vpa
Valentin PA.
2.
In case 1 is clear that as only one profit center is shown theoretically the inheritance rule is populating the Profi

It would be possible, I suppose. You could generate Idocs from the SD system (or an interface file) and import that info into the FICA system. Of course the FICA system could not know about the sales order etc - so limited research abilities would exist.
For the second question, that would only function in a single system scenario, and yes the SD document flow would reflect its clearing status in FICA.
regards,
bill.

Automatic PO from PR from MRP for transfer between plants

Hi,
We want to use the automatic creation PO with tcode ME59. this scenario is clear when the purchase is from a supplier. but ¿this can be used also for transfer between plants?
For example we don´t have info records for transfer this material to one plant to another and this is a requirement in automatic po
The PO type is also different when transfering the materials between plants
The PO does not relate a supplier in header, instead it has the plant code.
However I tried to execute the automatic creation of PO with ME59 and I obtain the error below
Thanks
Jorge G

Use ME59N,
But before using ME59N, you have to configure something, we know in ME59N, system will take default document type as NB automatically. (Check the sap note 924105, 114213, 994209)
You have to set the control T for the document type, so system will take the supplying plant instead of vendor.
Only then you can create automatic PO from ME59N.
I've tested that and I've done it successfully.
PO

Stock transfer between plants without STO and storage locations

Hi.
In case of stock transfer betwen storage locations with one step it is possible to do stock transfer between different stock types. But in Two step it is only possible to do stock transfer from unrestricted to unrestricted.
In case of Stock transfer between Plants without STO in one and two step stock transfer, it is possible to do stock transfer from unrestricted to unrestricted.
Is there any reason for this?

Hi
Thanks for your reply. But i could not understand the sentence - But this is not possibles with 2 step procedure. becasue 2 step is recored will be maintained . In 2 step it not possible. Can you please eloborate on this
Regards,
Vivek Swarnapuri

Report to track interlinked movement of a material in a two step transfer

Request your input for the following
The scenario is that the stock transfer from one storage location to the other happens a two step transfer (313 and 315). To track the invenotry movements they want a report on a daily basis (gap of 24 hrs, 48 hrs etc) which can list down all the details at item level for materials for which the movement type 313 has happened but movement type 315 still needs to happen and the time gap between these two steps (i.e wether it has been 1 day or two days. etc.).
Is there is a standard report for movement types which are interlinked (like in this case 313 and 315 ) through which we can track what is the time gap between the first and second movement type and how much stock is waiting for the second step to happen before it can be avaialable to sell.
Thanks

Hi,
Refer report MB51
here in selection screen enter mvmt types 313 and 315 and execute
Here add following fields in layout;
Entry Data and Time of Entry and anlayse the time duration for the movements 313 and 315.

Two Step Transfer: Cancellation of posted GR with G/L

System do not cancel material document having two line items of a material due to gain or loss postings.
Please also note that this is a two step transfer scenario of IS oil.
Can anyone help on this issue.

Hello,
I don't know if you still have the issue, but to avoid the error you should probably cancel the document via transaction [HUCANC].
Regards,
Stéphane

Script error when viewing two specific topics from application

We are connecting a web help project to an application. We are getting the following rather non-descript scrip error when launching two of the help toics from the application.
Continued strange behavior is that we do not get this error if we launch the index_csh file from Window's explorer and navigate to the topic or launch the topic itself by clicking on the file itself. Any ideas? We have hooked up a .chm file in the past.

Hi there
Do the errors disappear if you remove the hotspots?
You said:
So, we are calling the webhelp from an application and on the ones where there are glossary hotspots, we get the error message. I do not get the error message when I open the help file via windows explorer.
So you are saying the WebHelp is stored locally? Is the application the WebHelp supports stored locally too?
Does the same thing happen if you insert an expanding DHTML hotspot?
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

TS1702 I got this error when doing a restore

I got this error when doing a restore and the restrictions were turned on . I disabled restrictions and the restore was able to complete.

The error in itunes had a link to http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1702. I placed this message here for anyone that might navigate to the same message and would hopefully find this. Yes turning off restrictions allowed the restore to complete and everyone is now happy.

Ext. Number Range in Two Step Transfer

Hi I was trying to implement two step (IS Oil) functionality and I want to use external number range for tracking. I have already created a complete scenario of two step transfer but it works with Internal number range only. this is because in PO I cannot enter ext.no range due to non availability of this field in two step transfer tab. I need to find out how should i proceed to activate this field in PO. it only shows tracking number which system uses for int.no ranges.

Hi Leo,
Sorry, your question is not totally clear.
You wrote that you executed three postings of MVT 313. The question is that through how many postings you can receive this stock?
In this case I think the answer is that it depends on the 'stock in transfer' stock you removed from your storage location by MVT 313.
I mean if you posted 10 pcs than you can receive this qty through 10 postings if you receive only 1 pc per posting (MVT 315).
Please clarify your question.
Thanks,
Csaba

I downloaded and installed XI and when open wants me to buy DC and reenter serial number this gives and error. Does anyone know how to talk with Adobe Chat

I downloaded and installed XI and when open wants me to buy DC and reenter serial number this gives and error. Does anyone know how to talk with Adobe Chat

Hi Kevin ,
It seems like you are getting update to Install Acrobat DC .That is the latest version of Acrobat .
If you are getting an error message along ,could you please share the screen shot of the same so that we can check at our end.
If you wish to connect with Adobe support team ,refer the following link to get in touch with them.
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service1.html
Regards
Sukrit Dhingra

Error when doing two step transfer between Plants with split valuation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for