Error when upgrade from Trial SharePoint Enterprise to regular SharePoint Enterprise

Hi everybody,
a few months ago we build a VM with the Azure Template of a SharePoint 2013 which included the regular trial key. Now the key expired and our customer gave us an SP Enterprise key but then this error occured:
This product key cannot be used to convert SharePoint Server Trial with Enterprise Client Access License to SharePoint Server with Enterprise Client Access License.
So it´s say that the designated upgrade path is wrong. I am a bit confused.

Hi,
I do not think the issue is related to Azure Virtual Machine, it is more related to license issue i think.
Could you confirm to your customer the key is correct.
http://blog.christian-heindel.de/2013/03/28/sharepoint-2013-180-day-trial-is-only-available-as-enterprise-edition-and-cannot-be-converted-to-standard-license/
For more license issue, i think you may need to ask in license support:
https://www.microsoft.com/licensing/servicecenter/Help/Contact.aspx
Regards.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

Error when upgrading from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2014

Hello everyone,
Could you help me, i have an error when i try to upgrade my SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition to SQL Server 2014 Enterprise Edition,
All of prerequisits are available and i dont have a problem,
before the end of migration process, i have this error: The group name could not be found (0x84BB0001)
File log:
Feature: Database Engine Services
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred during the setup process of the feature.
Next Step: The upgrade process for SQL Server failed. To continue the upgrade process, use the following information to resolve the error. Next, uninstall SQL Server by using this
command line: setup /q /action=uninstall /instanceid=MSSQLSERVER /features=SQLENGINE,FULLTEXT,REPLICATION. Then, run SQL Server Setup again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The group name could not be found.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=12.0.2000.8&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006
Feature: Full-Text and Semantic Extractions for Search
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: The upgrade process for SQL Server failed. To continue the upgrade process, use the following information to resolve the error. Next, uninstall SQL Server by using this
command line: setup /q /action=uninstall /instanceid=MSSQLSERVER /features=SQLENGINE,FULLTEXT,REPLICATION. Then, run SQL Server Setup again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The group name could not be found.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=12.0.2000.8&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006
Feature: SQL Server Replication
Status: Failed: see logs for details
Reason for failure: An error occurred for a dependency of the feature causing the setup process for the feature to fail.
Next Step: The upgrade process for SQL Server failed. To continue the upgrade process, use the following information to resolve the error. Next, uninstall SQL Server by using this
command line: setup /q /action=uninstall /instanceid=MSSQLSERVER /features=SQLENGINE,FULLTEXT,REPLICATION. Then, run SQL Server Setup again.
Component name: SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features
Component error code: 0x84BB0001
Error description: The group name could not be found.
Error help link: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?LinkId=20476&ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=setup.rll&EvtID=50000&ProdVer=12.0.2000.8&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006&EvtType=0x0AD059E6%400x3FAAA006
Best regards,
Guiga Hafedh

There are more detailed logs for the various components. The one of interesting is the one for the engine or possibly the one for full-text.
These logs are extremely verbose, and the errors are rarely crystal clear, but at least give them a try. If you have problems, find a place to upload them (Dropbox, Skrydrive etc), so that we can look.
The closest at hand is that "group" that cannot be found is an AD group.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

XLR run-time error when upgrading from 2007A PL 39 to PL 42

My client recently upgraded from 2007A PL 39 to Pl 42, In PL 39, everything, including XLR, was running smoothly. Mow when client tried to open SBO, he gets this message:
XL Reporter
Run-time error u2018430u2019:
Class does not support Automation or does not support expected interface
The client has uninstalled and re-installed mythe client software, but gets the same error.
Any suggestions?

Hi Katie,
this error can occur with a DIAPI version mis-match. Again note 1247315 should help you in this regard, as there are steps there to follow.
If the note doesn't help, you could also set the logging level to 6 which would provide more information:
a. Locate the following key in the registry:
   My computer\HKey_Current_User\software\SAP\SAPManage\SAP Business   One\AddOn
b. Double click on logging level and enter value 6
c. Start XLR
Please send the log in SAP Business One Log folder from
Start->Run->%type%, you'll find log called SAPAddOn_01.log
Kind Regards,
Lilian Lynch
SAP Business One Forums Team

Maintaining user profiles when upgrading from v24 to newest version 36.X - Enterprise

Hi,
Im going to upgrade the Mozilla Firefox for about 500 users ish. The current version is 24.0 and we are upgrading to the newest version 36.0 something.
But the question is, how do I maintain all of the user settings when doing this upgrade? It is not an option to upgrade using the application itself. We have a centralized Config Mgr 2012 R2 solution. And I need to keep all of the user profiles with bookmarks, saved passwords, etc etc as it is today. The current version they are using have a few restrictions made with predefined and locked prefs in forms of automatic update, homepage, disabling the send data to Mozilla and so on, basically all of the standard enterprise configuration when you want to controll how the browser is for the users.
I've read a few articles on where to find spesific files, and what they are containting of information for the profile. But when doing a uninstall of the current version mozilla also removes whatever is stored in %appdata%\mozilla firefox\...profiles..
Is it even possible to "transfer" profiles for Version 24 to the newest version 36.something? Also, this needs automation, its not an option to manually restore each profile from "backup" for about 500 users. All profiles are unique.
Client computers are running Win 7 - 64bit OS.
Best Regards

To answer your question, when you update from 24 to 37 (the actual latest version) your profiles will migrate automatically, there should be no action needed on your part. We try to minimize profile breaking changes, so between versions 24 and 37 there is no need to do any special migration (that is only really a need when going from Firefox 3.6 or older to the latest version).
HOWEVER, since you are an enterprise and it looks like you only do upgrades every so often, I'd suggest you look into Firefox for Enterprises. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/
This version only updates major versions once a year (so from Firefox 10 to 17, from 17 to 24, from 24 to 31, from 31 to 38) but it comes out with regular security updates every 6 weeks. This way you don't have to continually re-certify Firefox major versions every 6 weeks, and can simply let automatic updates push out security updates to your users every 6 weeks (With your current model your users are vulnerable to all security holes found until you push the next major update). Then, next year, you have a 12 week overlap between versions to test and make sure nothing breaks before you push to the next major version.
There is also a mailing list for you to get help and advice with specific Enterprise issues.
If you decide to go this route (which I would strongly advise) then I'd suggest you wait for a couple of weeks until Firefox 38 comes out, the next ESR version. Then you can certify and not have to worry about deployments until 45 next year!

Runtime error when Upgrading from 8.81 pl05 to 8.81 pl08

Hello experts,
When upgrading 8.81 PL05 to 8.81 PL08, I encounter a runtime error concerning a Microsoft C++ Runtime Library. the text in the error box is "Runtime Error ! Program : D... R6025 -pure virtual function call. "
This error occured after the database check, the server tools and the common data base upgrades have already succeded. So at the end of the production database upgrade after each the databases have been upgraded, at the precise moment of Cost Center upgrades the upon descipted error occurs.
What could be the origin of this error ? What should I do in order to upgrades in PL08 ?
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Sébastien TABORE

Hello
I have the same issue and i would try with the possible solution but the link doesn´t exists anymore.
I received the same Error (Run Time Error program R-6025 pre virtual
function call.) At the moment it appears only when i make a search e.g. for the todays Outgoing Payments (around 60 registers) on the OVPM table.
But i'm affraid that could be appear more often or inside another transaction like invoices or sales order which are very important to us.
SAP Business One 8.81 PL 11
Regards,
Angie I.

Error when upgrading from 10.4 to 10.5

Hi,
I am getting an error message when I attempt to upgrade my macbook from 10.4.11 to 10.5. Before the installation begins I receive a message that states "You need 10.4 before upgrading.
I thought it may have been a HD problem so I used disk utilities to verify permissions. I then repaired permissions that were damaged but the problem still is occurring. I have updated the computer completely and I meet the required specs to run 10.5.
I think it sounds like I may have a systems file issue. Any help or suggestions would greatly be appreciated.
BTW the Leopard disc is a retail version.

MikeStan wrote:
Hi,
I am getting an error message when I attempt to upgrade my macbook from 10.4.11 to 10.5. Before the installation begins I receive a message that states "You need 10.4 before upgrading.
I thought it may have been a HD problem so I used disk utilities to verify permissions. I then repaired permissions that were damaged but the problem still is occurring. I have updated the computer completely and I meet the required specs to run 10.5.
I think it sounds like I may have a systems file issue. Any help or suggestions would greatly be appreciated.
BTW the Leopard disc is a retail version.
A retail version does not check for previous OSs. In fact it will install on a blank HD.
If it is a retail version, backup your HD (clone is preferred) and then insert the retail DVD and reboot holding down the "C" key and continue.
If you still get the message about 10.4 not being found, check the DVD carefully. Did you buy it from an Apple store or official Apple retailer?

Adobe reader error when upgrading from 9.4 to 9.4.5

I need to do the upgrade manually, and not the auto upgrade direct from adobe. When we have adobe
9.4 on the PC and do the upgrade to 9.4.5 I get this error.
Windows installer window comes up with this:
"The upgrade patch cannot be installed by installer service because the program to be upgraded may be missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program. Verify that the program to be upgraded exists on your computer and that have the correct upgrade patch."
The patch and the Adobe versions are all correct, I think it's something in the MSI file ???
Any suggestions???
Thanks
Paul

In addition, if you are talking about Reader, not Acrobat, then you need to install the appropriate updates for Reader. For Acrobat you can go to Help>Check for updates and try that. You may have to repeat it. If you are doing a manual update, then you need to go to the updatte page in the download portion of the Adobe site and download all subnumbers after the one you currently have and install them in order. Be sure to use the Reader or Acrobat updates as appropriate, they are not the same product. There is no product named Adobe 9. Adobe is the company and the products are Acrobat 9 or Reader 9. It is not clear which you have.

"This field name is not known" error when upgrading from VS 2003 to VS 2005

When we upgraded our web servers from VS 2003 to 2005, our crystal reports web viewer began having a problem with reports that contained sub-reports. We now are getting the following error on the web page. The reports were developed in Crystal 10, but I upgraded them to Crystal 11 but still recieved the same error.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
thank you
This field name is not known. Error in File C:\DOCUME1\DMDEVB1\ASPNET\LOCALS~1\Temp\CategorybyStateProductDist {B0FCB37B-A7DB-4786-AD69-55568EC94923}.rpt: Error in formula . '{usp_wd_RptCategoryByStateProductDist;1.State} = {?@State} ' This field name is not known.

HI Karl,
Also Try to update the database connection for the report.
You can do that by opening report in designer, then
Go To Database Menu -> Setdatasource Location
Connect to the datasource you want and update the datasource.
Save the report.
Hope this Helps !!!
Prasad

Troubleshooting 0x8007001f error when upgrading from 8 to 8.1 : How do I fix this?

Hello,
I have been trying to upgrade my windows 8 laptop to 8.1. However update fails due to error 0x8007001f. I have found out about this error is that an attached device is not working. How can I determine what is causing the issue?
Before finding out what the error specifically ment, these are the troubleshooting steps I've tried so far:
(1)Unplug all external devices, (like USB flash drives, mouse)
(2)A clean boot startup
(3)Turning off virus protection
(4)Installing the KB2864247 UPDATE
Thanks
in advance to anyone who responds.
(I've also heard that I should try to upload the setup logs file as a possibility, but I don't understand how to do so from this link: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh824819.aspx)

Hi,
Did this issue occurred when downloading the 8.1 update by windows store?
I suggest we try following steps and try to reinstall again:
Step 1:Clean update temp files:
1.Press Windows key + R, type service.msc and press enter.
2.Stop Windows update service.
3.Run following command lines one by one to clear update temp files:
cd %windir%
ren SoftwareDistribution SDTemp
exit
4.Restart Windows update service.
Step 2:Clear windows store catch:
1.Press the Windows + R keys on your keyboard to open the Run dialog.
2.Type WSReset.exe, and click/tap on OK.
3.The Store will now open, and state the following: The cache for the store was cleared. You can now browse the store for apps
If the issue persists, I suggest we backup all important files and try Reset this PC: PC settings -> Update and Recovery -> Recovery -> Remove everything and reinstall PC
Hope this helps.
Regards,
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Error when upgrade from 8.8 PL5 to other patch or upgrade

Hi,
I encountered a problem during the upgrade process from PL05 to another PL, to be precise
to PL13, PL14, PL15 and PL16.
In practice, the system does not allow me to select Common DB and Company DB in the list of components to upgrade.
If I look in log's folder and I find this trace:
Logger Started----
at : 10/11/2010 11:48:58:86350
10/11/2010 11:48:58:85350 UpgradeWizard Note I Technical Invoke CRegistry::GetStringValue(...) error! # # MID=-1 BOID=-1 BO= UserID= C:\B188SP0PL15\Wizard\Upgrade.exe Version=8.80.233 Area= PID=3268 TID=6140 D:\depot\BUSMB_B1\8.8_REL\SBO\8.8_REL\Application\SolutionPatch\Component\GlobalPropertiesManager.cpp 163
System:
Windows 2008 Standard R2 x64
SQL Server 2005 Standard SP3 x64
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Claudio
Edited by: Claudio Maddalozzo on Nov 10, 2010 12:31 PM
Edited by: Claudio Maddalozzo on Nov 10, 2010 12:31 PM

Hi,
Official starting patch level to install B1 is SAP B1 8.8 SP00 PL10. it is for fresh installation. you may uinstall the PL05 first and then install the PL10. After install the PL10, you can upgrade to whatever version of PL but I suggest to upgrade directly to PL16.
The another concern of your problem is the using of windows server 2008 R2 x64. This is not supported by SAP B1 8.8 SP00 PL05.
you may check this link to know more detail:
https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/smb/sbo/platforms
I quoted here:
Server Platforms 2005 A SP01 Add-Ons 2005 SP01 2005 B 2007 A 2007 B 8.8 / 8.81
Microsoft® Windows Server 2008 R2 (21)
- 64 Bit (x64) (22)
(incl. Windows Terminal Services) (12)
- Standard & Enterprise Edition X (24) X (24) X (24)
note:
(21) According to Microsoft® Corp., Windows Server 2008 R2 only supports SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3 and SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 1 and later versions.
(22) Microsoft® Corp. has announced that Windows Server 2008 is the last 32-bit Windows operating system. Therefore, support for 32-bit processors (x86) has been removed from Windows Server 2008 R2.
(24) Supported as of 2007 A SP01 PL08, 2007 B PL15, and 8.8 PL07. Make sure to also read SAP Notes 1434624 and 1435183 as well as the SAP Notes referenced in the Related Notes sections.
you must use PL10 as a starting PL before upgrade to PL16 in W2K8 R2 x64.
JimM
JimM

Error when upgrading from Win 7 Ultimate to Win 8.1

I get an error message my pc doesn't support prefetchw?
I'm just a home user not enterprise. I wanted to try a 8.1 upgrade eval. I have a Dell e510 that meets the hardware requirements.
Thanks,
gmarker

According to the Dell Support website, Windows 8 is not supported on your hardware:
http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/04/product-support/product/dimension-5150x/drivers In fact it is too old and not even Windows 7 is supported by Dell.
And the error message reinforces the age of your system because your CPU does not support the PrefetchW instruction.
So, contrary to what you may have been led to believe, your system hardware does not support Windows 8.1. You will either have to stick with Windows 7 since you claim it is running on your system now, or, you will have to upgrade your hardware to support
Windows 8.1.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. ”

Error when upgrading from 11.1.1.5 to 11.1.1.6

All,
I have been working on upgrading OBIEE from 11.1.1.5 to version 11.1.1.6. The 1st step is successful i.e. installation of OBIEE.
The next step is to upgrade MDS and BIPLATFORM schema. For that I am running PSA.bat and getting the following error in the log
please help.....
[2012-05-16T10:44:22.143-07:00] [Framework] [ERROR] [] [upgrade.Framework] [tid: 10] [ecid: 0000JTMk2MiEOPKpqSS4yY1FgyTq000000,0] D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\jdk\jre\bin\awt.dll: The specified procedure could not be found
[2012-05-16T10:44:22.205-07:00] [Framework] [ERROR] [UPGAST-00054] [upgrade.Framework] [tid: 10] [ecid: 0000JTMk2MiEOPKpqSS4yY1FgyTq000000,0] error loading config file D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\upgrade\components\biplatform.xml
[2012-05-16T10:44:22.205-07:00] [Framework] [ERROR] [] [upgrade.Framework] [tid: 10] [ecid: 0000JTMk2MiEOPKpqSS4yY1FgyTq000000,0] Cause: failed to load the configuration file
[2012-05-16T10:44:22.205-07:00] [Framework] [ERROR] [] [upgrade.Framework] [tid: 10] [ecid: 0000JTMk2MiEOPKpqSS4yY1FgyTq000000,0] Action: See the secondary error message for additional details.
[2012-05-16T10:44:22.205-07:00] [Framework] [ERROR] [] [upgrade.Framework] [tid: 10] [ecid: 0000JTMk2MiEOPKpqSS4yY1FgyTq000000,0] [[
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\jdk\jre\bin\awt.dll: The specified procedure could not be found
     at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1807)
     at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1724)
     at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:823)
     at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1028)
     at sun.security.action.LoadLibraryAction.run(LoadLibraryAction.java:50)
     at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
     at sun.awt.NativeLibLoader.loadLibraries(NativeLibLoader.java:38)
     at sun.awt.DebugHelper.<clinit>(DebugHelper.java:29)
     at java.awt.Component.<clinit>(Component.java:566)
     at oracle.ias.update.plan.PlanSchema.<init>(PlanSchema.java:202)
     at oracle.ias.update.plan.PlanStep.<init>(PlanStep.java:159)
     at oracle.ias.update.plan.PlanComponent.<init>(PlanComponent.java:155)
     at oracle.ias.update.plan.Template.load(Template.java:153)
     at oracle.ias.update.plan.Template.loadAllTemplates(Template.java:98)
     at oracle.ias.update.UpgradeDriver.loadJ2EEConfiguration(UpgradeDriver.java:670)
     at oracle.ias.update.UpgradeDriver.main(UpgradeDriver.java:183)

I am pretty much following the same links but none has those errors explanation. I am not sure why I am getting this error.
D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\oracle_common\bin>psa.bat
Oracle Fusion Middleware Patch Set Assistant 11.1.1.6.0
Log file is located at: D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\oracle_common\upgrade\logs
\psa2012-05-16-10-44-21AM.log
D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\Oracle_BI1\jdk\jre\bin\awt.dll: The specified proc
edure could not be found
UPGAST-00054: error loading config file D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\Oracle_BI1
\upgrade\components\biplatform.xml
Could not initialize class javax.swing.JCheckBox
UPGAST-00054: error loading config file D:\Oracle\OracleBI\Middleware\oracle_com
mon\upgrade\components\audit.xml
The command failed to complete successfully

Original serial number when upgrading from Trial version

Hi,
I just bought LR 5.5 because my Trial version was over. When trying to put in the serial number, it says "This is an upgrade serial number. The serial number for your previous version of Lightroom is also required." I do not have the original serial number. Am I missing something here?
I had bought Lightroom 5 stand alone and the email I got says I bought following:
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5
US$79.00
Upgrade, Mac/Win, English, Download
Is it not the right version to buy?
Thanks.

I am having the same issue now too - I purchased the "Lightroom 5 Standalone perpetual license - Mobile capabilities not included" today and it won't let me register with the serial number I got in the e-mail confirmation because it advised I needed the original product serial number too. No where in the purchase process of the Stand Alone did it say anything about this being an upgrade. This is very deceptive by Adobe. Is the Stand Alone product really just an upgrade? How do I get this resolved?
Lightroom 5 standalone
Perpetual license – mobile capabilities not included.
Lightroom 5 standalone
Perpetual license – mobile capabilities not included.

Ild error when upgrading from WorkShop 6.1 to 6.2

I'm trying to use WorkShop 6 update 2 to compile and link.
The options are "-compat=5 -O -instances=static -features=bool -g -xs -O0 -library=iostream,rwtools7 -liostream -mt -lCstd -lCrun -lthread -lc ...".
But link editor reports errors (seems multiply-defined):
ild: (error) NamedHookApplicationBase::__vtbl is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
ild: (error) __RTTI__1nYNamedHookApplicationBase_ is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
ild: (error) __RTTI__1CpnYNamedHookApplicationBase_ is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
Previously, I used 6.1 to do the same thing, free of any error. :(
And I could not find any more about that thourgh 6.2 Release Notes.
Did I miss any thing?
Thanks so much!

Well, it's strange.
I removed "-instances=static" from compilation to test. And this time, no such error was raised any more.
In my opinion, the very characteristic of static instances linkage is that all the instances are placed under the current compilation (and are not visible outside the compilation unit), which might increase the size of the program.
But one more problem about "-lcx" occurred when I compile and link another set of C++ source files:
The error messages are:
Text relocation remains referenced
against symbol offset in file
__q_mag_sub 0x2f8 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
__q_mag_sub 0x358 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
__q_mag_add 0x310 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
__q_mag_add 0x344 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
<unknown> 0x50 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0x94 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0x9c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0xac /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
.stret8 0x37c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
.stret8 0x148 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_dtoq.o)
.stret8 0xbac /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
.stret8 0x11c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_stoq.o)
.stret8 0x3c4 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
.stret8 0xb4 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_utoq.o)
ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
The compile command is
CC -compat=5 -g -xs -library=iostream -mt -features=no%conststrings ... -lCstd -lCrun -lm -lw -lcx -lc
Still like the "ild error" we've been discussed, this kind of errors were not reported when I use lower version compiler 6.1.
What puzzles me is that there is no "-B" option in the compilation cmd. But it seems that ld tried to link "libcx.a" but "libcx.so", even "libcx.so.1" does exist under the same directory. Then I ran an experiment, I manally put "-Bdynamic" before "-lcx", the error messages remain. :(
I didn't get much result after search "-lcx" from internet. Do you know why this happens?
Thanks,
kidfire

Error al actualizar de windows 8 a windows 8.1 / Error when upgrading from windows 8 to windows 8.1

Tengo un G580 con windows 8 instalado y actualizado completamente, cuando intento actualizar a windows 8.1 mediante la Tienda, sale un mensage que dice:
La tienda Windows no esta disponible en este equipo.
Ponte en contacto con el administrador del sistema para obtener informacion.
Soy el unico usuario con privilegios de administrador, en Windows Update no aparece la actualizacion a Windows 8.1
¿Alguna Solucion?.
Gracias.
I have a G580 with windows 8 installed and updated completely, when I try to upgrade to 8.1 through the shop windows, I get a message that says:
The Windows Store is not available on this computer.
Contact your system administrator for information.
I am the only user with administrator privileges in Windows Update does not appear the upgrade to Windows 8.1
Any Solution?.
thanks

Hi @MsgE-8
Welcome to the HP Forums!
It is a terrific place to find answers and suggestions!
For you to have the best experience in the HP forum I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide Learn How to Post and More
Here is a link to HP PCs - Updating Windows 8 to 8.1
Here is a link to the Windows Compatibility Center where you can have it scan your computer to ensure you can update to Windows 8.1.
The errors you received are usually due to a driver issue.
Good Luck!
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Error when upgrade from Trial SharePoint Enterprise to regular SharePoint Enterprise

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for