Error while doing MR11 reversal

Hi,
Have an issue in MR11 reversal,
The details as follows,
1. PO quantity 1 EA
2.IR done fiirst for 0.250 EA
3.GR done for 1 EA
4.User did MR11 to clear GR/IR learing value
5.after MR11,user cancelled IR & GR
6 Now he is trying to do MR11 reversal and system gave error message as shown below,
Performance Assistant:
Purchase order history already inconsistent --> Quantity 0.750- EA Value 49.95 CAD
Message no. CKMLGRIR025
Diagnosis:
The purchase order history contains differences between the goods receipts and invoice receipts/Account maintenance for the order item in fields Difference Quantity (= 0.750- EA) and Difference value (= 49.95 CAD).
The purchase order history for this item is inconsistent.
is ther any way to solve this issue.
rgrds...

Hello Jurgen,
Thanks for your suggestion.
FYI.I got reply from SAP,the correct way is the Account Maintenace should be reversed first, thenfollowed by GR and lastly the IR posting.But user has done GR IR reversal before MR11SHOW.
We have to implement report ZM_CHECK_EKBE_AREWR from note 372246 for this issue.
Thanks once again.
rgrds...

Similar Messages

Error while doing MR11 as enter Profitability segmet as Cost object

Hi All,
While doing MR11, we noticed a error message (ZC - 001) as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
The specified Material account is created as Cost element (CE Category 11) and in OKB9 configuration this cost element is choosed (ticked) with the option "profitability segment". Also there is no substitution rule to derive profitability segment in OBBH substitutions.
However there is a validation (GGB0), where the above specified Material account is included in the range of accounts in the Prerequisite, and Check as "Profitability segment is > (greater than) 0000000001 and with the message maintained as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
Can any please help why this error has come at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards
Karun

Hi Eli,
Thank you very much for reply.
I hope the note 184987 is not applicable in our case as the Field status of specified Material account does not have required entry for Profitability segment.
Can you please let me know if we have entry in OKB9 and existance of entry in Validation creates the problem and throws the above error message?
With regard to other note 134484 which you have specified on "error in Account assignment check in MM transactions" says "A detailed default account assignment (for example profitability segment) was defined in Transaction OKB9. However, the profitability segment is not set up correctly for goods movements: the characteristics material, plant, business area are missing. A later check of the profitability segments against material, plant and business area then generates an error message since the profitability segment is inconsistent".
Is there any way to confirm whether this situation is leading to our error before implementing this note.
Thanks & Regards
Karun

Error while doing GR : Deficit of PU GR quantity 5 EA

I am getting the below error while doing the reversal of GR:
Deficit of PU GR quantity 5 EA : <material><plant><pur grp>
Please let me know the solution to rectify it.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Check the latest goods issue docs for this quantity and cancel that GI doc. This will bring the required stock to enable you cancel the GR. After creating new GR, cancel the "cancelled GI doc" to complete the loop.
or
Increase the stock by doing GR against 501. After new GR, cancel this 501 doc.
or
Post issue return (202) for this quantity. After new GR, cancel this 202 doc.
or
thro' physical inventory, you can add the stock. After new GR, make another PI doc. to set right the stock.
While the first option is a best one, based on your urgency/superior approval, you may opt for other options also.
Regards,
Siva

Business Area-Cost Center error while doing VL09 (PGI Reversal)

Hi Friends,
Kindly go through the "ERROR" message and "IMPORTANT" point as mentioned below:This is happening while reversal of PGI in VL09.
IMPORTANT: Just to make you aware, the cost center in error (CONSDSPL) was nowhere assigned in FS00 or OKB9. Also to state that at the time of this error some different cost center was assigned in FS00 which was having business area SUGR. So PGIs are picking up two business areas i.e. 1.DSPL (from Plant-Division-BussA setting) & 2. SUGR (for P&L GL from FS00)
Following error coming while doing PGI reversal:
ERROR -
> BAL1/CONSDSPL CTR belong to business area DSPL not SUGR
Message no. KI188
Diagnosis
Account assignment object BAL1/CONSDSPL, type CTR is assigned to business area DSPL. You made an explicit assignment to business area SUGR.
System Response
The posting row may contain only one business area.
Procedure
Perform one of the following actions.
Make an explicit assignment to business area DSPL. To do so you must set the "Business area" field as entry-ready in Customizing.
Enter an account assignment object assigned to business area SUGR.
Change the assignment of BAL1/CONSDSPL to business area DSPL. Note the document number and continue processing the document after changing the assignment.
PLEASE GUIDE. NEEDED ANSWER BADLY.

Business area filed in cost center CONSDSPL is DSPL (what it should be). In this scenario, they have assigned SGPRODCTN cost center in GL master wherein business area is SUGR.
That means, when accounting entry is getting generated, it will show two business areas. One will be fetched from "Plant-Division-BussA" setting (SPRO) & the other from GL. Also to make you aware that here the business area should be DSPL, but since they assigned wrong cost center in GL master, the entries are going to SUGR as well.
Most important thing to notice out here is that when this error came "no default account assignment was done through OKB9" The cost center showing in error viz. CONSDSPL was nowhere assigned. So the question is from where the system is fetching this cost center?

Error while executing the reversal in KO88 for an internal order

Hi Experts,
I am getting the below error while doing the Actual settlement : order reverse through t code KO88. we are currently using the SAP ECC 5.0 and i found the SAP notes 215944 and 335428, which are upto release 4.6C.
System error - deletion not possible
Message no. AAPO186
i can see that the doc has generated for the settlement and for reversal it is giving the error. Can some one help me who has faced this type of problem earlier.
Thanks & Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
Additionally, try to check 300273 note.
Regards,
Eli

Error while doing ABGL Asset Credit Memo

Hi Friends,
I am getting the below error while doing Asset Credit Memo in ABGL. Please help me in fix this issue.
Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
Note:In Asset Explorer Fiscal year start Asset value is 98,425.45 and Change is 4768.19. So total Asset value as of now is 1,03,193.64.
Now we are trying to do ABGL with 12,790.23 value (Transaction type is 105). System is giving the above highlighted error.
If we give the amount 4768.19 in ABGL transaction, system is not giving any error. If we give more that that system is giving error.
Why system is giving error even the asset has balance of 1,03,193.64? Please help me on this..
Thanks
Sunil

Hi,
If the asset has been capitalized during earlier years, use ABGF to post credit memo. ABGL is meant for assets capitalized during the year.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Error while doing "Visulaize Plan"

Hi,
Before i did Visualize plan many times without any problem.Now I am getting error while doing so.
I was able to run "Explain Plan" successfully.
I am on HANA revision 60.
I saved above error log and the log information is given below:
I can identify invalid XML tag <TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved> but how to fix this issue?
I gone through various blogs related to Visulaization Plan but not found related to this issue.
<Plan xmlns="http://www.sap.com/ndb/planviz" ID="ID_0" Type="Estimated">
<SQL><![CDATA[SELECT KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO, SUM(MEGBTR)
FROM "_SYS_BIC"."raj/AN_VIZ"
GROUP BY KOKRS, BELNR, PERIO]]></SQL>
<CompileTime>
<Start Unit="us">1401281467643661</Start>
<End Unit="us">1401281467658329</End>
</CompileTime>
<RootRelation ID="ID_0" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
<Name>Project</Name>
<ExecutionType>Row Search</ExecutionType>
<Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
<Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
<EstimatedCost>
   <Exclusive Unit="us">2.12902e+06</Exclusive>
   <Inclusive Unit="us">2.64021e+06</Inclusive>
</EstimatedCost>
<EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
<Details><![CDATA[{"Projected Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO, SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)","Project column0":"NString(4, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [3]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [0]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [1]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [2]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column1":"NString(10, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [8]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [5]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [6]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 1 ....... [7]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column2":"NString(3, 0) __trex_field_NVarchar3__() ....... [13]:040:<5/7 (16B)>:
/1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [10]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [11]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 2 ....... [12]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:","Project column3":"Decimal(18, 3) __typecast__() ....... [23]:076:<10/12 (16B)>:
/1/ Fixed16(18, 3) __trex_field_Fixed16__() ....... [19]:043:<6/8 (16B)>:
     /1/ void* \"__rids__\" ....... [15]:NOP:<0/1 (8B)>:
     /2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 0 ....... [16]:LOAD:<3/4 (4B)>:
     /3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [17]:LOAD:<4/5 (4B)>:
     /4/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [18]:LOAD:<5/6 (4B)>:
/2/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 18 ....... [21]:LOAD:<8/9 (4B)>:
/3/ int32_t(10, 0) const := 3 ....... [22]:LOAD:<9/10 (4B)>:"}]]></Details>
<Child ID="ID_8" >
</Child>
</RootRelation>
<Relation ID="ID_8" TypeName="TREX_SEARCH" Status="Finished">
<Name>Column Search</Name>
<ExecutionType>Column Search</ExecutionType>
<Summary><![CDATA[Aggregation on a single table]]></Summary>
<Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
<EstimatedCost>
   <Exclusive Unit="us">511194</Exclusive>
   <Inclusive Unit="us">511194</Inclusive>
</EstimatedCost>
<EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
<TablesInvolved><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></TablesInvolved>
<LogicalPlan ID="ID_11" Type="Estimated">
   <RootRelation ID="ID_11" TypeName="PROJECT" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Project</Name>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
    <Child ID="ID_12" >
    </Child>
   </RootRelation>
   <Relation ID="ID_12" TypeName="GROUP_BY" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Aggregation</Name>
    <Summary><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO\nSUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)]]></Summary>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>648284</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
    <Details><![CDATA[{"Grouping Cols":"raj/AN_VIZ.KOKRS, raj/AN_VIZ.BELNR, raj/AN_VIZ.PERIO","Aggregation Cols":"SUM(raj/AN_VIZ.MEGBTR)"}]]></Details>
    <Child ID="ID_13" >
    </Child>
   </Relation>
   <Relation ID="ID_13" TypeName="TABLE" Status="Finished">
    <Name>Column View</Name>
    <Schema><![CDATA[_SYS_BIC]]></Schema>
    <ObjectName><![CDATA[raj/AN_VIZ]]></ObjectName>
    <Location>hanasp7:30003</Location>
    <EstimatedCost>
     <Exclusive Unit="us">0</Exclusive>
     <Inclusive Unit="us">0</Inclusive>
    </EstimatedCost>
    <EstimatedOutputCardinality>682404</EstimatedOutputCardinality>
   </Relation>
</LogicalPlan>
</Relation>
</Plan>
Regards
Raj

Hi,
To solve this you must update your studio. In lower studio versions (PlanViz) does not allow "unknown" XML tags sent by higher version servers. A fix for this issue was made so that PlanViz parser can simply skip unknown tags.
Please go to version 74, if possible.
Regards,
Michael

Error while doing EHP4 upgrade in downtime phase

HI .
Iam facing the below error while doing the EHP4 upgrade , in downtime phase.
Checks after phase MAIN_SWITCH/STARTSAP_TRANS were negative!
Last error code set: RFC call to subst_get_uvers failed with key RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION (open): SAP_CMINIT3 : rc=20 >
Connect to SAP gateway failed Connect_PM GWHOST=Hydhtc4526D, GWSERV=sapgw04, SYSNR=04 LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode ERROR partner '10.136.162.30:3304' not reached TIME Mon Jun 06 18:17:46 2011 RELEASE 720 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 40 RC -10 MODULE nixxi.cpp LINE 3286 DETAIL NiPConnect2: 10.136.162.30:3304 SYSTEM CALL connect ERRNO 10061 ERRNO TEXT WSAECONNREFUSED: Connection refused COUNTER System start failed
Please help me in resolving this error.
Sanketh.

Hi,
Upgrade tool is trying to start the system but system is not coming up. Try to start system manually and see if system comes up or not. If not then check logs in work directory for why system is not coming up.
Thanks
Sunny

Error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement

Dear Experts,
We are facing error while doing GR for scheduling aggrement.
we have done the following steps.
1) Scheduling aggreement in ME31L
2) Released in ME35L
3) Mainatined Sch.Agmt Schdule in ME38 for todays and date 200 qty and other line is 800 qty.
When we are trying to do GR in MIGO system is giving the following message.
Document 5500000152 does not contain any selectable items
can I know what I have missed in the above steps.
Please guide me to resolve this.
Regards,
Prasad

Hi,
Please check Please check if Gr is already done against this document. Also please check whether you have attached SA in the source list with line items.
T-code:ME01
Enter Mat.code & Plant.
In the next screen pl.do the following:
Valid from - commencement date of the SA
Valid to - End date of the SA
Vendor - Vendor on whom the SA is released
POrg - Your purchase organisation
PPL - Leave it blank(This is only for interplant)
OUn - Ordering unit
Agreement - SA number
Item - 1
I hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you

Error While doing ABT1N transaction

Hi,
I am facing the below error while doing ABT1N in Asset Accounting.Please help me in fixing this Issue.
Error Message -No depreciation area for receiving the revenue
Message no.AAPO149
Diagnosis
You tried to post a retirement on asset 1000 100007-0.You entered transaction type 300,in which the retirement with revenue indicator is not set
You tried to transfer asset 1000 100007-0.According to transfer variant 0001,none of the areas on the asset uses a transaction type for retirement with revenue
In both of these cases, you are not allowed to enter revenue or make specifications for the determination of revenue.
Proceedure
Check the transfer variant and check your entry
please do the needful
Thanks
Supriya

Hello,
You will have a check box for the same.
Double click on transaction type, you will see the check box for revenue.
Otherwise, tomorrow I will get back to you once I am in front of the system.
Regards,
Ravi
Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on May 5, 2009 7:53 PM

Error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation

Hi,
I am getting the below error while doing F-90 Asset Acquisation scenario. Please help me to fix this issue.
Tax code V1 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
Message no. FF713
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
Create a new tax code if necessary.
Caution:
Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
Thanks
KB

Hi,
you need to maintain Tax Code A0 & V0 in t.code OBCL t.code.
and also ensure to check whether you have created tax code V1 or not in FTXP t.code. If not, create V1 tax code and assign GL on that in the right Transaction event keys in OB40.
Try.... if not working let me know....
Regards,
MOhan.

Error while doing AIAB Settlement

Hi I am facing the below error while doing AIAB during AUC settlement. Please do the needful.
Data for determination of capitalization not managed in area 01
Message no. AW507
Diagnosis
You have chosen a depreciation area, which does not carry the depreciation data from table COEPBR.
Procedure
Choose a different depreciation area.
Thanks
KC

Hi,
This message could be helpful:
Error AW507
Please check the field T082AVIEWB-AUTHORITY. If it is not on 2 this is the reason.
In this case, you can change the value in T093-VIEW1 using the coding as per SAP note 29706 which you have already discovered. There will be no risk involved in changing this value.
regards Bernhard

Error while doing AUC Settlement in KO88

Hi
I am getting the below error while doing KO88. I have maintained the Allocation structure for FXA and given the cost element group in the Source field & Given FXA in Receiver category and selected By cost element option aginast Receiver category FXA in Settlement Cost Element field. I am getting the below error while settling in KO88.
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Please help me
Thanks
Kishore

Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
regards
Ranjan

Error while doing BAM configuration in JDeveloper

Hi,
I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
"Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
Host Name: SOA1(system name)
Port Number: 80
User Name: Administrator
Password: <windows domain pwd>
Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shaily

hi Shaily
It looks like suggesting a different forum is not needed, because you already tried that ...
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper
I hope you get some answers.
success
Jan Vervecken

Error while doing BAM connection in jdeveloper

Hi,
I tried to create a connection to my local BAM Server in JDev 10.1.3.2.0 and also in 10.1.3.3, but I always failed! Error messages:
"Server is not set up correctly SOA1"
I'm running on Windows 2003 and installed BAM according to the Installation Guide (version was Bam with Enterprise Link for windows 10.1.3.3.0).
I did not get any error while doing the other setups and can access the different BAM tools via the Oracle BAM Start page, but I can't create a connection in JDev. I used the following parameters:
Host Name: SOA1(system name)
Port Number: 80
User Name: Administrator
Password: <windows domain pwd>
Domain Name: DOMAINNAME
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Shaily

*** Duplicate Posting ***Edited by: damorgan on Oct 6, 2008 11:05 PM

Error while doing MR11 reversal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for