Error with Update Rule Formula

I have the following formula in an update rule
CALMONTH_FISCPER( Calendar Year/Month, 'SO', 1 )
and get the error (below) when loading data to the cube (loads ok to PSA). I have checked ROUTINE_0001 via the Generated Program and it is referring to a problem with the formula could someone assist? Thanks
error in a formula function (ROUTINE_0001 routine)

Hi:
Yes. You will have to maintain Fiscal Variant and Period breakdowns for that year.
If data is coming from R/3, its a good idea to speak with R/3 Finanace and tell them to amintains variant and periods in R.3 and then you can do a Global Transfer.
If not, you can maintain them directly in BW. I think you know how to do this part.
Ram Chamarthy

Similar Messages

Uknown Error in update rules while loading into InfoCube

I load data from BC 0FIAR_O03 ODS into BC 0FIAR_C03 ICube.
While loading I got error on second data package (1st package loading ok)
The error message in monitor informs about error in update rules.
I got nothing special than I looked into Application Logs (tcode SM21). It tells about message 560 with addition "no documentation exists for message 00560"...
I can't get what's wrong. The update rules for ICube is BC without any modifications and data loaded succefully into ODS.... Any ideas?? Where I can find more inforamtion about error occured during update??

update rule terminated if data load contains more than 1 data package. don't know why. I solved problem by spliting load process by Fiscal Year ranges

Error with update my windows phone 801883f error couldn't be installed

Dear Sir,
Plz Solve this Issue ASAP
error with update my windows phone 801883f error couldn't be installed
therefore, i can't update my windows phone
Salim

Hi,
This error code means that the specified path couldn't be found.
To fix this issue, I suggest we try following steps and try to reinstall again:
Step 1: Clean update temp files:
1. Press Windows key + R, type service.msc and press enter.
2. Stop Windows update service.
3. Run following command lines one by one to clear update temp files:
cd %windir%
ren SoftwareDistribution SDTemp
exit
4. Restart Windows update service.
Step 2: Clear windows store catch:
Press the Windows + R keys on your keyboard to open the Run dialog.
Type WSReset.exe, and click/tap on OK.
The Store will now open, and state the following: The cache for the store was cleared. You can now browse the store for apps
Then, please try to update Windows 8.1 again.
Regards,
Kate Li
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Issues with update rule

Hi All,
I am having a problem with update rule
My object
A
B
C
D(Seller phase) (complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer) (complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer) (complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer) (complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
My transaction during Add
A
B
C
D(Seller phase)(complex table)
Q1(Question)
A1(Answer)(complex table)
Q2(Question)
A2(Answer)(complex table)
Q3(Question)
A3(Answer)(complex table)
E(Collection object)
D(seller Phase)
Q(Question)
A(Answer)
here is my requirement:
During Activity create/Edit upon choosing seller phase i bring questions based on update rules of q1 q2 and q3 from complex table.
Possible answers are also fetched from complex table based on selection of phase for each question. I have a update rules for answers to check the object collection(E) and determine if this phase exist or not, If exist previously selected Answers will bulled from collection for the corresponding question if not it has to empty.
All rule are working with out any problem.
Issue.
During create or edit if some one chooses phase P1 and answers for the questions and with out saving if they change phase then answers which are been selected earlier still exist.
This is happening in IPAD but not in ATE. I have checked the log for rules all the rules are returning values as expected.
So i tried the below options to test
1) with special value option in field level
2) I created a dummy field with update rule with value test. On creation i have modified the dummy field value X then changed the phase the value is not getting updated as per update rule.
Is it the real behavior of update rule? Is there any work around for this problem
Regards,
Gupta

Gupta,
So based on your comments above I have the workarounds I gave you.
1) A button that refreshes "resets" to make the screen repaint (in essence a button that just re-navigates to the same screen will make all the system reset) if you just want one screen.
2)Or the multiple screen approach. Let phase 1 be in one screen and the other questions and answers on others.
Not sure if you can just do 1 screen with multi-tiles - If this is better approach where the phase selection is on 1 tile (top tile) and the questions and answers are on a different tile (bottom tile).
The trick is to make the screen repaint. As long as you present to the customers a flawless flow you will be okay. The one that you don't want to happen is when your rules are buggy then it may be just a good idea to sell a more controlled flow that works than debugging what went down the wrong during UAT (User Acceptance Test).
Regards,
Mark

Error in Update rules while defining CKF at cube level

Hi,
I am willing to create a Calculated Key figure at CUBE level using formula function
Unit Cube: Item Cube / Units
Definitation
Item Cube - Total Cube for line
Units - Actual destination quantity in alternative unit
Units
The Unit for Item Cube is Volume unit and
The Unit for Units is Alternative Unit of Measure for Stock keeping Unit
When i tried to create CKF at Cube level in update rules using formula it is displaying me an error that no unit is available in source system for the CKF Unit Cube
How can I proceed on this
Thanks

Hi
Have you transferred the global settings from the context menu of source system where all the units from the source is replicated to BW system
Regards
N Ganesh

Error in Update Rule migration using "Create Transformation"

Hi gurus,
We are encountering errors in the migration of our 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_BX update rules into a transformation via URs Context Menu Additional functions - > Create transformation
This action creates a new transformation, but is only generating very little Routine assignements in our KF fields. That is, some KF have their old ABAP converted automatically into ABAP OO while the rest (majority) of KF fields have no rule (routine) assigned at all.
However, the most surprising thing is that after executing the "Create Transformation", the log shows everything correct and warnings (message 652 "Routine created. Verify sintax").
Have you ever faced this problem?
Is the automatic migration tool working correctly?
If not, do we need to manually create all those KF routines that have not been correctly been migrated? Even after two years since new dataflow that was released?
We are on SP 15...
Thanks and best regards,
Enric

Hi Juanjo,
In fact, if I understand you correctly, I'm facing the same situation: all FORMS based on OLD individual KFs routine are now available in the global transformation routine in ABAP OO, but what I'm missing is the individual source to target KF field mapping to routine, where the method with the perform to each coding should be done.
Shall I understand this is a common bug? Manual correction proposed?
Thanks,
Enric

Currency conversion error in Update rules for 0SD_C03

Hi All
I have freshly installed Sales Overview cube 0SD_C03 from BI Content(3.x version) and when extracting data from datasource "2LIS_13_VDITM" there is an error "Error: Conversion foreign curr. -> local curr.: 0090000000 20080516 M -> SGD".
Till PSA data is loading fine, there is error while loading from PSA to cube(ie. in Update Rule).
Checked in the PSA for the errored records, all the records which have 0(zero) as amount are green and the rest of them are errored with the above message.
When checked in the manage cube there are added records but the request is red.
Please let me know if some one as the clue.
Regards
Jayant

Hi
You will find the transfer global settings for the source system where you are extracting the data.
Select the source sytem, right click,go to transfer gloabal settings, (select the currencies in this)
Then Reload the data into the cube,
After, Reloading the data into the cube replicate the master data, and activate the mappings,and load the data.
I think, this will work....
Regards
Sudheer

Error with Statement Rule: Reference is ambiguous

Hello,
Hopefully someone will be able to help me out with this inquiry. I have a configurator model where the BOM has been imported. Within this model, there are two BOM nodes of the same name (Item Number) but they are unique in the model by their effective dates. Basically, I have the following:
Model
__Feature1
____Option1 Eff_In: 1/1/2009 Eff_Out: 9/20/2011
____Option1 Eff_In: 12/21/2011 Eff_Out: 9/21/2090
If I create say a CONTRIBUTE statement rule referencing node 'Option1', I get an error that reads "The reference Option1 is ambiguous". I understand that I am getting this error because Configurator cannot determine which instance of this Option1 I am referring to. Can anyone tell me how I can specify the specific node required? I would have expected that Configurator would always look at the structure effective dates, but it would appear not. I have looked at using full path or properties as part of my node reference, but the effective dates don't appear to be a standard system property that can be referenced (unless I missed something).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Paul Wentink

From: Veerendra Singavarapu <veerendra.singavarapu@...>
Sent: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:50 am
To: [email protected]
RE: [configsig] ambiguity error
Hi Lauree,
As Carole rightly pointed out, this issue has been recently fixed in 11.5.10 branch. This happens only when the ECO change brings one or more item’s attribute changes. i.e. for instance an OC undergone an ECO change, with {min=0 and max=null} prior to ECO change and {min=0 and max=1} after ECO change can cause this issue.
With regards,
Veerendra S.
==========
From: Lauree Swihart [mailto:lswihart@...]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 10:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [configsig] ambiguity error
Thanks a bunch Carole!
==========
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Landgrebe, Carole
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [configsig] ambiguity error
Hi Lauree-
This is a known issue, and I had them create a fix for it in 11.5.10 when we were on 25-43A. Now the issue exists in 12 and I haven’t yet logged the TAR for that. We have exactly the same issue as we force all bom changes through ECOs, and even putting effectivity dates on the rules that match the effectivity dates of the BOM does not resolve the issue. Fix was produced off of TAR 7619362.994, looks like bug number was 8737252….not sure what release it was part of, we applied it as a manual fix, a jar file and an update to package body for cz_model_util_pvt.
Holler if you need more info.
Thanks!
Carole
==========
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Reinsch, Ted A (GE Energy)
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [configsig] ambiguity error
Have you refreshed the model since this change?
The only time I have received this error was if I was using the same component in more than 1 option class or option feature and it tells me that I need to further define the path to the object in the rule such as
'ATO Model Name'.'Option Class 1'.'8003-518.8003-519.8003-502.029-4572-03' or
'ATO Model Name'.'Option Class 2'.'8003-518.8003-519.8003-502.029-4572-03'
==========
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lauree Swihart
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 10:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [configsig] ambiguity error
I have a component that is currently in a logic rule. When this component is in a logic rule it works.
This same component was changed out on an ECO, causing 2 records in the BOM. One with an end effective date and another with a begin effective date. When I convert my rule to a statement rule, I receive this error. I’ve received this error in the past and normally I thought I’d just changed the effectivity range associated with the rule and that resolved the issue. But, it’s not resolving the issue today.
Is there any other way for me to resolve this without deleting the component in the bom that has been effectively end dated? I don’t want that route because that defeats the purpose of using an ECO and general foundation of why we use ECO’s for our healthcare products.
The reference 8003-518.8003-519.8003-502.029-4572-03 is ambiguous.
Thanks,
Lauree Swihart

Error in update rules in inventory

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with the update rules.I am getting the syntax error in Production when checking in the update rules. It says the program "INCLUDE report "RSBCTGN_TOP" not found".
Actually these update rules were working correctly in Development.
Is there anyway to transport that program alone or do i have any other way to handle that in Production itself as i have access to it.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
venkat

Hi,
first try with SE38 if this include RSBCTGN_TOP is existing and active, if inactive activate it.
also check whether infoobject 0GN_BWBEOTY is active.
/manfred

Error in update rule during activation

Hi All,
I am updating data from a DSO to infocube which are all migrated versions from BW 3.5.to BI-7.0 The update rule to the infocube is fine and without errors when i check it. However on activation , a short dump is being generated. The message class of the eror is RSAA and message number is 108X,which says it is an internal error. Please can any of you advice a solution.
Many thanks in advance.

Ram,
Check your char and time char properly mapppled for all filed with refereing key figures.
Thnaks
Thota

Error in update rules mapping

Hi,
I have added two new fileds into the view and then replicated in bw side.The two fields mapping correctly in Transfer rules.Getting error for two fileds while adding in the update rule.
Thanks,
Jayapal.

Hi Jayapal,
Hope, SAP Note 588247 will help you to resolve this issue. It is giving "Rule incorrect" error, may be because of Infoobject 0RECORDMODE is ignored.
Veerendra.

Error in update rules *urgent*

Hello all,
We got error in loading 2LIS_03_BF due to loss of connectivity to source system ,
After correcting the connection I tryed to reload the delta.
while loading we got all the records (100000 of 100000) but the processing is still running at
Second step in update
plz through light on this issue
Regards..... SAP

Hi SAP,
HAs the extraction been finished for your data load? If so are you able to see the data packets in processing in yellow state? then try making the status red and then update the data pckages manually.
If your data packets taking time to get processed in the update rules stage, reduce the data packet size and then reload, this should give less records to process in the update rules.
Regards
Srini

Error in update rules when trying to add a field

Hi Gurus,
I would appreciate if u could help me out.
I am trying to add the field Cumulative order quantity in sales unit ( 0CML_OR_QTY) in the update rule of 2LIS_11_VAITM. The field already exists in transfer rule and communication structure. When i am trying to add the field its giving and error message :No routine has been created for InfoObject BP:Business Partner Group (from Hierarchy) (data ield: Cumulative order quantity in sales units).
I have tried to make the BP field as initial value. But still the same error persisted.
Kindly let me know as to how to proceed.
Thanks & Regards,
Kapil

Hi,
Are you creating update rules for a ODS or a cube. If it is an ODS please make sure that none of your Key Fields are referring to the routine.
Now first please add this 0CML_OR_QTY to your data target and activate it. Once you do that you will see that it will automatically come in the update rules and will be not assigned. Now once this is done you can assign the required value
Regards,
Pramod

Error in Update Rules

Hi All,
I am encountering the below error while activating the update rules of 0LIV_DS01
IC=0LIV_DS01 IS=2LIS_06_INV syntax error: The type "/BI0/OISR_SVP_LSY" is unknown
Please guide me.
Thanks.....

/BI0/OISR_SVP_LSY exist in your system? Maybe any transport is missing (InfoObject OISR_SVP_LSY)

Error in Update rule

Hi Gurus,
I need to find out what caused the update rule in the production to become inactive.
I use SM37 JOB LOGS, BW Monitor but I could not find out. Any advice.
Thanks
Liza

Hi Liza,
Check the following.
1. Go to the UR and click on the 'check' button ( second button from left menu bar ). It will give the error details.
Inactivation also can be caused due to the improper transport of the data target,
update routines/start routines changes.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Aditya

Error with Update Rule Formula

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for