ERS generated document with zero value for SES

Hi,
I have maintained service entry sheet.
Accounting entry is generated.
When I run T code MRRL, it has generated document with zero value.
This is not a free goods PO.
Why this is happening?
Please guide on this issue.
Regards,
Piyush

Hi,
Creating an ERS zero document is an expected system behavior ,you           
could create an ERS zero document by doing the following wrong           
procedure:                                                                               
1. Create PO with ERS falg ON.                                           
2. Perform GR for PO.                                                    
3. Create the invoice by MIRO.(Not MRRL).                                
4. Run MRRL (LIV-ERS).                                                                               
For every purchase order with flag 'ERS' a table entry is generated.     
If a goods receipt is posted, this GR should be invoiced via ERS         
(Tr. MRRL). Manually posted invoices should be avoided, because          
the table entry will not be deleted. A new invoice receipt must be       
created while running ERS (but with amount and quantity zero and without 
FI documents) in order to give a message to the vendor because he        
has sent you an invoice by mistake.                                      
Could you please check also the note:1069215
Best regards
Erika

Similar Messages

  • ERS generated document with zero vaue for SES

    Hi,
    I have maintained service entry sheet.
    Accounting entry is generated.
    When I run T code MRRL, it has generated document with zero value.
    This is not a free goods PO.
    Please guide on this issue.
    Regards,
    Piyush

    Repeated by mistake

  • Extra accouning line item in billing document with zero value

    Hi,
    I am using TAXINN procedure, the following accounting document has been generated during billing.This accounting document contains an extra line item with zero value.
    However, There is no necessary for this line item with zero value. Can you tell me how to remove this line item?
    000       50          VAT Payable                       A0             0.00
    001       01          Sale within state                 A0      1,212.00
    002       50          Sales f/goods-Dome.          A0      1,000.00-
    003       50          ED Collected Clr.                 A0          160.00-
    004       50          ED Collected Clr.                 A0              3.00-
    005       50          ED Collected Clr.                 A0              2.00-
    006       50         VAT Payable                      A0            47.00-
    Thanks,
    Kanhu

    Hi
    Check if there is any summarization active for billing documents generated through SD. The path for the same is:
    IMG>Financial Acxounting>General Ledger Accounting>Integration>Sales & distribution
    Check for table VBRK
    Regards
    Sanil  K Bhandari

  • Extracting data with zero values for periods without data

    Hello Together,
    i extracted data from our hfm application from period 1 to 3.
    Now i found that some rows begin with period 2 or 3 because there are no data in period 1 or 2.
    So my question is, how i can get zero values for periods with no data.
    Hope someone can help me.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Martin
    P.S.: Our actual hfm version is 11.1.1.3
    edit

    For the periods with no data, HFM does not have a "0" to offer for the data extraction. Since the default data extract from HFM has each period on it's own row in the *.dat file, I don't understand your comment about rows starting with period 2 or 3. In the *.dat file the row for period 1 simply won't exist. Are you using a custom approach/tool for data extraction?
    The only time HFM will offer a "0" where there is indeed no data, is if you extract derived data. You must include calculated data, and even then I believe HFM will only extract a "0" for the first period after a period where there was data, and only for flow accounts (Revenue/Expense). so if you have "100" in period 1, and no data in period 2, such that the derived value YTD for period 2 is "0", then you must include calculated values in the extract and you should see "0" for period 2. However, I don't believe HFM will extract "0" for period 3 - instead it will be blank/missing.
    In general it could be very dangerous to force HFM to give zeros where there is no data.
    --Chris                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Outbound created with zero value against STO PO

    Hi experts,
    I have created an outbound delivery (VL10D) against STO PO. OBD has been created with zero value. in PGI correct accounting entry is getting generated. However, material price is maintained in STO PO.
    Please highlight the gaps, due to which amount in OBD is coming as zero. Subsequently, in billing document zero value is appearing.
    regards

    probably something wrong in your price schema if you want copy the price from the STO, or you just missed to maintain the price conditions if you use special intercompany prices.
    For details see OSS Note 338922 - Analysis note for cross-company transactions (delivery)
    look at point 6 in this note.

  • Copa assessment from cost center posted with zero values

    Hello all,
    We are running for the first time in my clients system assessment cycle for actual values from cost center t copa
    The cycle at the test run shows the values and the reciever tracing factor allright but in update run the document created with zero values
    Can anyone adress me why this happnes
    Thanks
    Michal

    Hi,
    You must be getting some errors in update run, like profit center update (if new gl active) or other, please check and revert.
    Br

  • TCode MIR7: Dump while deleting Parked Invoice with zero value

    Hi,
    We had parked an Invoice using TCode MIR7 with Zero Value with reference of a PO. Now as the value of invoice is zero, we want to delete it using MIR7.
    In MIR7, when we go to Invoice Document-->Delete, it results in dump. Dump is as follows:
    Error analysis
        Short text of error message:
        No document found
        Long text of error message:
        Technical information about the message:
        Message class....... "FI"
        Number.............. 124
        Variable 1.......... " "
        Variable 2.......... " "
        Variable 3.......... " "
        Variable 4.......... " "
    How to correct the error
        Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.
        If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to
        find an interim solution in an SAP Note.
        If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following
        keywords:
        "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "
        "SAPLFMPR" or "LFMPRU05"
        "FM_CO_DOCUMENT_DELETE"
        If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error
        notification to SAP, include the following information:
        1. The description of the current problem (short dump)
           To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File
        (Unconverted)".
        2. Corresponding system log
           Display the system log by calling transaction SM21.
           Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes
        after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File
        (Unconverted)".
        3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP
        program: The source code of the program
           In the editor, choose "Utilities->More
        Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".
        4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which actions and input led to the error.
    Information on where terminated
        Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPLFMPR" - in
         "FM_CO_DOCUMENT_DELETE".
        The main program was "SAPLMR1M ".
        In the source code you have the termination point in line 34
        of the (Include) program "LFMPRU05".
    Any help.
    Regards,
    CMC Team.

    Hi,
    Check following SAP notes:-
    1173846  (MM) Termination when deleting prepaid logistics invoices
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This problem is caused by a program error.
    1224772  (MM) Error message FI24 when deleting parked invoices
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This is due to a program error. The total amount of the parked invoice is '0'.
    Regards,
    Anand Raichura

  • Incoming payment with zero value

    Good Morning,
    I'm trying to do an incoming payment with zero value (Negative JE and Positive Invoice selected) but I have the error message: "Confirmation amount must be greater than zero". I have the Internal Reconciliations to do that, but I need to print an outgoing payment document (and with sequence number) with this.
    I'm working with Sap Business One 2007 A SP: 01 PL: 10. This option was available in previous versions. Do you know what can I do?
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Susana Cunha.

    Dear Ms Cunha,
    I am sorry but it is not possible in 8.8 either.
    However, a workaround is adding this document with a negative value (even -1 as doc total is enough) in the same payment with antoher document that carries positive value.
    I tested this scenario in 8.8 and it worked because the postive document had a total document higher than the negative document.
    Regards,
    Marcella Rivi
    SAP Business One Forums Team
    Edited by: Marcella Rivi on Jun 16, 2010 4:46 PM

  • Issue with Negative Value for Total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY.

    Hi Experts,
    we loaded the Cube with datasources 2LIS_03_BX, 2LIS_03_BF and 2LIS_03_UM.
    We mapped the quanity field from 2LIS_03_BF in transformation either into Key figures "Quantity issued from valuated stock" (0ISSVALSTCK) or "Quantity received into valuated stock" (0RECVALSTCK ) of the cube.
    For obtaining the Total Valuated stock, we used the Key figure 0VALSTCKQTY. This key figure is having the Inflow and Out flow values as 0RECVALSTCK and 0ISSVALSTCK. When i tried to check the content of 0VALSTCKQTY, the key figure  0VALSTCKQTY is not present in the infoCube content. I understood that the value for this key figure would be calculated at the time of query execution with the formula
    { Last obtained Valuated stock + (Received Valuated Stock u2013 Issued Valuated Stock ) }.
    The issue is the first records in the query is obtained with negative value for the total valuated stock 0VALSTCKQTY even though the values of Received Valuated Stock  and  Issued Valuated Stock are with Zero.  Could any one please help me on how the first record in the query is with a negative value eventhough the inflow and out flow fields of it are with Zero.
    Many Thanks in advance.
    Jeswanth

    Hi Srini,
    I observed an interresting reason for the stock being with negative in the first record.
    Issue : While executing the BEx report, we have the first record with a negative value.
    Let me explain with an example
    Material  : XYZ
    Plant      : A
    Date of Stock Initialization for data source 2LIS_03_BX -
    >  12th April 2009.
    So on 12 Th April 2009 consider that we have a stock in store with a value of 2640.
    Then we have loaded wih Data source 2LIS_03_BF for all Historic Movement types.
    At the time of query execution we will have the first record with a negative of available stock present on the day of initialization .
    So, as we have initilized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th April 2009, we have at that time a stock of 2640 in availability.
    Exactly with the same value of 2640, we are having a negative value i.e. -2640.
    and also one more point to be noted is ...as we have initialized the data source 2LIS_03_BX on 12 th APril 2009...it has created a
    opening balance of 2640 on the day of initiailization i.e on 12 th April 2009 in infocube....(which is an extra record...)...so if the previous record of 12,04,2009 is having some value in it..then it will get added to 2640 EA..which will give incorrect stock
    So in the query the records will appear in the below following manner
    Calendar Day     Total stock                                                                Received stock                                          Issued Stock         
    28.12.2005 --->  - 2640 EA
    29.12.2005 --->    2000 EA                                                                       640 EA                                                        0
    10.04.2009 --->      0                                                                                0                                                               2000 EA      
    11.04.2009 -
    >    0                                                                                0                                                                0          
                                 (For making
                                  the earlier record of  initilization to 0  a negative value -2640 EA is created in the first record )
    12.04.2009 (Initializtion day) --->  2640 EA                                                 0                                                                0
    13.04.2009 
    the day before initialization the total stock will be 0 due to the negative effect introduced by the first record and from the day of initialization the records will be the accurate values...  On 12 th april 2009 we can see that a stock of 2640 is brought into the total stock. In fact if there is no negative value i.e. -2640 in the first record then ...the value on 11.04.2009 will be 2640 Ea and this will get summed up with the Opening balance of 2640 EA created by 2LIS_03_BX on the day of intitialization. So on 12 .04. 2009 the total stock will be shown as 5280 EA...so in order to prevent the double value only we observed that the first record is created with the negative of available stock present on the initialization ...to make the record before the day of initialization i.e. 11.04.2009...to be 0...so that from 12 th April 2009 ..will start to see the actual total stock in the query result...
    This is happening only if we use  both the data sources 2LIS_03_BX and 2LIS_03_BF  for loading into BW.....
    If we load alone by 2LIS_03_BF ...then as 2LIS_03_BX is ruled out in the loading...then no negative of available stock will be created ...because there will be bno opening balance created on the day of initialization.....and the opeing balance available will be flowing into consecutive records due to the movement types and 12 th April 2009 will be shown with avaialable total stock of 2640 EA.
    Kindly let us know your opinions on this...
    Thanks.
    regards,
    Jeswanth

  • Is it possible to create purchase order with zero value ?

    Is it possible to create purchase order with zero value ?

    Hi,
    There are two scenarios where the purchase order is created with zero value.
    1. Standard Purchase order with Free tick indicator.
    Whenever we expect a material with free of cost from vendor, we use to put the free indicator in item overview.  This means the material is valuated at zero price irrespective of price control in material master. Quanitiy is updated while receipts.
    Conditions tab in item detail doesnt appear.
    2. Consignment PO.
    While creating a purchase order for consignment, the system doesnt ask us the price and the condition tab doesnt appear in item detail.
    An info record for consignment must be maintained before making the GR.
    Hope i have clarified.  If you want any further clarification. please do reply.

  • COPA document with missing values

    Hi Experts,
    after posting in SD (debit memo rebilling) a CO-PA document is created, but with missing value for value field 'interest'. In transaction KE4I, there is correct assignment of SD condition to value field
    'interest'. We use cost based CO-PA.
    We have tried to Check Value Flow in Billing Document Transfer - transaction KEAT and also to Simulate billing document transfer with KE4ST, but in these transactions everything seems correct.
    Can you please write any other reconcilliation reports I can try for this?
    Which customizing do I have to check?
    Are there any OSS notes for this problem?
    Thank you very much for your help,
    Michal

    Hi,
    The problem was solved using OSS note 20254.
    Best regards,
    Michal

  • Inventory difference.. upload with with zero value

    Hi
    Material : Label . Sticker
    UOM     : KG  
    Additional UOM : EA  (  1 KG = 100 EA approx.  ) normally it varies + -10%. means some times there are 90 EA in 1 KG, sometimes 110 in 1 KG.    
    We purchase Stickers in KGs. and Issue in EA in System . for example when user request issue 500 Ea labels. we issue 500 EA label in system, but physically we give  5 KG.
    when user consumed 500 EA and , then he found 45 EA left out of those 5 KG. ( means actually there were 545 Ea in 5 KG Lables).
    how we can take these 45 EA. into Inventory. ( upload quantity only ) ( with out any accounting entry \ with zero value ).     
    or is there any other best way to deal this.  keeping in view it is impossible to count these lables while purchasing or issue.
    thanks \ thomas

    thanks Guru for giving time.
    with this 2nd option
    Option2
    post a 202 movement, use external value field(may need to be customized) and give zero value there.
    This has the benefit that you would not give a credit to the cost center,
    and as you post the inventory for zero amount,
    a new moving average price is automatically calculated and updated in material master.   "
    when i tried with MB1A and 202.  one thing.  Cost center is compulsory  second there is no filed  "External Value Field" ( plz guid some steps how to customize it .  , 
    thanks \ thomas

  • Project Stock - goods receipt with ZERO value

    Hi all,
    when WBS element is assigned in production order, for a specific material Goods receipt is posting with ZERO value.
    When there is no WBS element assignment , it is posting normally. I have checked QBEW and QBEWH tables, there also stock is updated , but value is ZERO.
    what could be the reason?
    regs,
    Ramesh B

    You have to set in  via customizing:  Project System -> Structures -> Operative Structures -> Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) -> Create Project Profile
    In Project Profile / tabstrip "Control" /  section "Project StocK"/  set valuated stock

  • Posting with Zero Values in AFAB

    Hi all,
    My client wants to run depreciation with zero values, since they are maintaining Assets in FA Module but doing manual deprecations due to certain unavoidable reasons.
    By mistake we ran depreciation for 4 months for the assets in SAP. I know that we cannot reverse those entries. But I have passed rectification entries in Finance.
    But I am not able to update the Asset Masters with the correct values. How can I revert back the values in Asset Accounting so that my net book value is also 100 % now? Will AFAR work and if then how?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sajan

    Hi Srinu,
    Thanks for your response.
    The situation is that, we went live in 2008 and we implemented Asset Accounting also. But client did not migrate legacy assets into SAP. They started using Asset Accounting only for new Assets. They did not run depreciation using AFAB. Infact, they calculated it manually and posted depreciation.
    Now the thing is that we will not be able to open year 2010 in Asset Accounting unless we close year 2008. But since, depreciation was not carried out, system is not allowing us to close year 2008. I was trying to run depreciation for year 2008 with out posting any financial entries in the system and I achieved it in quality client. But unfortunately in production, it posted entried for July-Nov 2008.
    Now I want to revert that as well as run AFAB with out posting any entries for Nov & Dec 2008 so that I can close this year.
    Hope you have understood the requirement. Any way out from this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sajan

  • PO with Zero value in SRM

    Dear All;
    We are using SRM7.0 with classic scenario i.e shopping cart is created in SRM and PO is triggered in SRM but created in ERP.
    Sometimes, the buyer gets a shopping cart with several lines. After negotiation with the supplier, he agrees (the supplier) to give one of the items as free.
    While converting SC to PO in SRM, the system asks to  enter a price so that PO can be created in ERP. Then the buyer has to put 1 then goes to the ERP and tick the free indicator flag.
    Is there a way to create a PO with Zero value from SRM?
    Thanks

    Hi ,
    After the price is entered in the PO in SRM  , delete the price conditions in the conditions tab at the item level in SRM . This will mark the free goods tick in the ECC automatically .
    This works in our extended classic system .
    -Hari.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Split Billing document by value

    Hi Expert    I have a requirement by customer that the max value of an invoice should be 100,000 usd. that means any sales orders whose total value greater than this will be splitted into serveral invoices. for example:    a sales order has a total a

  • RSS Feed Rejected?

    RSS Feed: http://feed.podcastmachine.com/podcasts/9160/mp3.rss I had a topic a few days ago entitled, "Issue with Subscribing" Thanks to some immaculate help I found out that my RSS feed host server basically broke so I had to re-start from scratch.

  • Color sync not working

    I'm using SL 10.6.2 and an Epson stylus photo r280 and can't get my colors from Photoshop elements 8 or IPhoto to print correctly. I've calibrated the display and tried all the color management settings on the print setup dialog. Any ideas about how

  • Problems with https connection

    Hi there. I use java1.4 and tomcat 4.0.I have trusted certificate. And my code is: try{ URL url = new URL("https://localhost:443/index.html"); URLConnection con = url.openConnection(); BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(

  • Access report export to excel shows =sum() text boxes prefixed with the textbox name

    When exporting reports from access to excel the =sum() (group and total sums) text boxes all have the text box name prefixed to them in excel. They look good in access reports. Any way to turn this off? Why is this happening? I've seen the same issue