ERS Settlement transaction MRRL exclude items

Hi SAP Gurus,
We are using ERS Settlement transaction MRRL on ECC 5.0.
When I ran the settlement, there was an item that I wanted to exclude for the current settlement run. So I selected the item and then clicked the save button (exclude from ERS). But now, I want that item to appear in a subsequent settlement run and it does not.
How do I get it to appear?
Thanks for your help.
Linda

Linda
An easier option is to make the exclusion in the selection screen where you click on the multiple selection and exclude the document required to be excluded. The next time you could only select the item excluded and complete the ERS run. However you can run the ERS run by selecting only the ones you had excluded by mistake. Also since this was under test run, you could cancel it and then subsequently add it also.Hope this helps.
Since it was a test run only, you can cancel it and run the job again.
Karthik
Message was edited by:
Karthik Coneru

Similar Messages

ERS Settlement MRRL Exclude items

Hi SAP Gurus,
We are using ERS Settlement transaction MRRL on ECC 5.0.
When I ran the settlement, there was an item that I wanted to exclude for the current settlement run. So I selected the item and then clicked the save button (exclude from ERS). But now, I want that item to appear in a subsequent settlement run and it does not.
How do I get it to appear?
Thanks for your help.
Linda

Hi Linda,
You can do the itemwise settlement for ERS vendor & it is working fine in my case.
I am also working in ECC 6.0
How many line item you have in your purchase order.Please write in detail.
Regards,
Manish
Dont forget to give point if useful ans.

Txn MRRL - Not able to exclude documents in ERS settlement

Hi
We are using ECC 6.0. If we run Txn MRRL in "Test Run" mode, it will give list of Documents ready to be processed for invoice. And upon running the Txn, it will process all the eligible documents and generate FI documents.
Now my question is how to exclude some of the documetns from ERS settlement. We used 4.6C so far, in which we have an option in the header "Exclude from ERS". But in 6.0 we don't have such option. What should we do to exclude some docuemnts from ERS when running MRRL.
Thanks
Venkat

I have the same issue. however when i hit save - save to exclude, and then re-run MRRL without the test run, the line items have not been excluded, and it creates FI documents.
Any help on why its not excluding the items?

ERS Settlement Issue

Hi all,
I'm facing an error "ERS settlement: No message was found for partner ....../company code ......"
while doing settelment through MRRL Transaction.
Pls Note: I had done all the settings to the best of my knowledge, but still this Error is appearing.
Settings that i had done and Checked:
1. In Vendor Master --> Purchasing View.
Set the GR Based IV Verfication and AutoEvalGRSetmt Del. indicators.
2. In Purchase Info Rec --> No ERS checked is removed.
3. In Purchase Order, GR Based IV and ERS Check are defaulted and Tax Code is also Specified.
4. Message output is also Defined in SPRO
Message type is maintained with Access Seq 0002 'Ccode + Vendor'
condition is also maintained in MRM1 transaction and Printer is also attached in communication.
But still i'm facing this error.
Regards,
S Anand

Hi
error : ( ERS settlement: No message was found for partner ERS : co code : 1111)
Ans : SPRO u2192 Logistic Invoice verification u2192 Message determination u2192 Master condition.
Message setting = ERS
Key combination ; Co. Code;
Regards
anand

Park FI document created by ERS settlement

i have completed all the steps of ers and comepleted the ers run... but my client requirement is that they want the FI document which post automatically in ers after the PO and MIGO is completed should be parked not posted automatically...in short the FI document should be parked not posted automatically... is that possible???? please help...
Regards,
Abhay
Message was edited by: Jürgen L

Hi,
Another way of mapping your requirement.
Create a new payment term as Z900 in t.code:OME2 and keep B (Blocked for payment) in Block key field in Pmnt block/pmnt method default segment and then assign the new payment term Z900 to vendor master in t.code:XK02 and save.
Create new purchase order for that vendor code and do all ERS process(MIGO,MRRL and MR90) where your all ERS invoices posted with auto-payment block.
Now go for releasing blocked invoice with t.code: MRBR and then pay to your vendor.
Regards,
Biju K

On hand quantity exists or there are open delivery transactions for this item

Hi all,
on hand quantity exists or there are open delivery transactions for this item in oracle apps at the master item copy from & lines status in Transaction Form in Backordered.
Thank You

Hi,
Make sure you completely receive the PO, then you should be good enough to convert the item to expense.
Thanks
-Arif.

Time Machine has been excluding items for hours... and counting!

I have been using time capsule for several years now. But today I brought a new hard drive to use with Time Machine. It's a Western Digital My Book Network drive.
Plugged it in selected the new disk and started to back up. For hours now it has been 'Excluding items..'. It has apparently excluded over 5 million items! Why is it doing this?
I've checked the list of files to exclude and it's just set to exclude the desktop and the Downloads folder.
I don't understand why it has been excluding items so long. Nothing had been copied to the external disk yet. If anyone could help me I'd be much apreciative!
Thanks, George!

georgeShawkins wrote:
Well now I have this new hard drive
You may avoid some confusion and/or problems by not calling it that. It's a +Network Attached Storage+ (NAS) device, or +network drive.+ Yes, it contains a hard drive, but OSX handles it very differently for many purposes. You've already seen that you can't format it via Disk Utility, for example.
I'd rather not have erase the whole disk and put the wanted data back onto it.
If you can copy that 50GB elsewhere temporarily, erase the drive, then copy it back, that may be much faster and easier than deleting the Backups.backupdb folder. It contains at least several hundred thousand, perhaps over a million items, that OSX must delete one at a time. It may also have permissions or other problems.
Erasing, however, takes only a few moments.
This is why we recommend giving Time Machine its own, exclusive space. See #3 in Time Machine - Frequently Asked Questions (or use the link in *User Tips* at the top of this forum).
Are you putting other things on the network drive? If so, you may have problems there, too, as Time Machine will eventually use all the empty space available to it.
Those backups will be inside a rather odd container called a +sparse bundle.+ If you're really on Leopard, as per your signature, you can limit the maximum size of the sparse bundle, per #A8 of Time Machine - Troubleshooting (or use the link in *User Tips* at the top of this forum).
But since you've posted in the +Snow Leopard+ Time Machine forum, if you're on 10.6.3 or later, that won't "stick," so you may want to see if you can partition the network drive via WD's software (another thing you can't do on a network drive via +Disk Utility,+ unfortunately).

Financial transaction and commitment item category

Hello,
Can any one suggest what financial transaction and commitment item category can be used when creating the following commitment items:
u2022     Value added tax (VAT)
u2022     tax on profits
u2022     before-tax income
u2022     nett income
u2022     net financial result
And moreover, should such a commitment items be created?
Thanks
Irina

Hi Irina,
As I said, the real question is whether you are going to use these commitment items for budget management. If not, it does not really matter if it will be defined 50/2 or 50/3 - in any case, the AVC will not be applied to these lines. It's not even necessary to define a separate commitment item for these G/Ls; it's possible to define one dummy commitment item for all transactions which are not relevant for budget activities.
Regards,
Eli

Financial Transactions in commitment item

Hi Gurus
We are facing this error while entering the Goods receipt i.e MIGO
Transaction for a import materail while trying to save the MIGO we are
getting the error " Posting not Possible;Incorrect financial
transactions of commitment item" We tried to change the financial
transactions but still the system is showing the same error and not
allowing us to save the MIGO.
Please suggest some solution as it is very urgent issue and affecting our business operations.
Regards
chetan

Hi,
Use t.code: FS00 and check the GR/IR , Stock accounts and other G/L involves and see what is the field status group , you have maintained for all G/Ls.
Now use t.code: OBC4
Select your field status variant & Click Filed Status Group TAB and check the Filed Status Group, what u have mentioned for the GR/IR ,Stock account & other G/Ls
Go To additional account assignment segment and put optional entry for the commitment item and save.( hope for any one of your G/L, is it required entry, just change and make it optional)
Now try ur transaction.
Regards,
Biju K

ERS Settlement Error message Reg

Dear All,
Im doing the ERS settlement configuration first time i have configured the Messages and outputs but at the time of settlement run it is showing error message as "ERS Settlement No message was found for partner 305469 company code 1000"
how to resolve this issue...
REgards
Anand.

hi,
have you configured the condition record for the output type ERS with that particular vendor what you are using.
check and revert back.
Regards,'
velu

Time Machine excluding items....

Hi,
Newly installed Server 10.6.6 Mac Pro.
When enabling Time Machine to backup the boot drive onto a 2nd internal drive it starts, and then starts "excluding items" and backs up only 40MB in the end while there's over 130GB of stuff to back up. There are no folders set to be excluded, the TM drive is newly formatted and empty.
Re-added the drive through system preferences, reset spotlight, trashed the preferences... everything we tried has failed. Any thoughts on this ?
Thanks,
Jay

Hi
http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/ServerAdminv10.6.pdf
Pages 36, 37 and 155 onwards. Time Machine is not really a 'backup' solution for OSX Server itself as such, especially if dealing with Mail and Open Directory Databases amongst others. It can also cause lock ups for clients accessing and changing data in configured share points although your mileage may vary. It's actually OK as a Time Machine destination for client workstations.
Tony

Time Machine ignoring excluded items (performing full backup)

Hi.
I started having problems with Time Machine recently.
My macbook hard drive has 250 GB, 80 GB free. In the Time Machine preference pane options I have selected a couple of folders so that an "estimated full backup" is 52.9 GB. When I'm running TM it tries to backup the full drive (160GB) ignoring the folders I chose to exclude.
I have verified and repaired both my main hard drive and the external drive used for Time Machine.
The log in the console initially says that it is going to backup 44GB and then it continues copying more data:
1/24/10 10:14:02 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Starting standard backup
1/24/10 10:14:03 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine Backups/Backups.backupdb
1/24/10 10:14:10 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Backup content size: 157.0 GB excluded items size: 113.0 GB for volume Macintosh HD
1/24/10 10:14:10 PM com.apple.backupd[378] No pre-backup thinning needed: 53.73 GB requested (including padding), 260.74 GB available
1/24/10 11:14:04 PM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 4.1 GB of 44.0 GB, 1471 of 782012 items
1/25/10 12:14:05 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 6.3 GB of 44.0 GB, 20599 of 782012 items
1/25/10 1:14:06 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 9.0 GB of 44.0 GB, 48709 of 782012 items
1/25/10 2:14:06 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 11.1 GB of 44.0 GB, 124469 of 782012 items
1/25/10 3:14:07 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 21.9 GB of 44.0 GB, 155468 of 782012 items
1/25/10 4:14:08 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 42.0 GB of 44.0 GB, 156348 of 782012 items
1/25/10 5:14:08 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 62.5 GB of 62.5 GB, 156455 of 782012 items
1/25/10 6:14:09 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 83.1 GB of 83.1 GB, 156517 of 782012 items
1/25/10 7:14:10 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 103.7 GB of 103.7 GB, 156648 of 782012 items
1/25/10 7:56:21 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Copied 183712 files (114.1 GB) from volume Macintosh HD.
1/25/10 7:56:23 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Backup canceled.
1/25/10 7:57:55 AM com.apple.backupd[378] Stopping backupd to allow ejection of backup destination disk!
1/25/10 8:20:53 AM [0x0-0xb50b5].backupd-helper[2308] Not starting Time Machine backup after wake - failed to resolve alias to backup volume
1/25/10 8:46:07 AM com.apple.backupd-auto[2421] Not starting scheduled Time Machine backup - time machine destination not resolvable.
Thanks for the help!

Hi, and welcome to the forums.
We have seen this on rare occasions.
Start by Repairing your Time Machine drive and verifying your internal HD, per #A5 in the Time Machine - Troubleshooting *User Tip,* also at the top of this forum.
Also do a "full reset" of Time Machine via #A4 there.
If that doesn't help, there's probably something corrupted in OSX.
You'll need to reinstall it from your Snow Leopard Install disc, then download and install the "combo" update to get back to 10.6.2. Info and download available at: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL959 Be sure to do a +Repair Permissions+ via Disk Utility (in your Applications/Utilities folder) afterwards.

ERS - transaction MRRL creating invoices with value ZERO service

Hello!
I have a service sheet, then a 101 movement,I reverse it and created the 102.
By mistake the ERS was run and created a IR with zero value.
I tried to reverse de IR document in MR8M and I get the error:
You are not allowed to have zero lines only
If I try to modify the Service Sheet I get:
An invoice already exists for this entry sheet
According to note 385905:
ERS zero documents cannot be cancelled. As these are documents without an update to FI, such a cancellation process is also not useful.
How can I post this invoice correctly??
I need the IR backed out so I can re post the invoice correctly. If I try to create a new service enry sheet the system tell me it is complete.
THANKS!!!
Edited by: SussyO on Jun 29, 2010 12:55 AM

Dear Sandra,
For every purchase order with flag 'ERS' a table entry is generated.
If a goods receipt is posted, this GR should be invoiced via ERS
(Tr. MRRL). Manually posted invoices should be avoided, because
the table entry will not be deleted. A new invoice receipt must be
created while running ERS (but with amount and quantity zero and without
FI documents) in order to give a message to the vendor because he
has sent you an invoice by mistake.
The different handling has intentionally been implemented because
in Tr. MRRL, you can use the message determination.
Using Tr. MRRL, a message to your vendor is created (because he may
have sent you an invoice probably by error). Now he'll get a zero bill.
Also, please verify the SAP note 385905 which explains that these invoices are
visible in your PO history. It goes onto say that these documents cannot be cancelled and anyway, because they have no FI docs, such a cancellation would be useless. And please verify more one SAP note 415286.
Regards,
Paulo Evaristo

ERS invoice creation MRRL

Hi,
     In my system we are creating ERS invoices using the MRRL transaction , but this is taking too long . We are using MRRL to settle shipment cost documents , the approx. number of settlement sheets generated every day in our business scenario is about 2500 . So inspite of running MRRL every day ( in Doc. selection 4 - since 3 errors out with max no. of items allowed in FI ) the job takes nearly 4- 10 days to complete a weeks invoices.
Any help would be welcome here.
Kunal

Hi,
You can create 3-4 variants with set of Vendors and run the job.
Ex. vendor 000001 to 000200 - > Variant 1
   Vendor 000201 to 000400 ...> Variant 2
Vendor 000401 to 000600 ....> Variant 3.
   Vendor 000601 to 000800 ...> Variant 4
Hope this this will deduce the overall job completion time very much.
Thanks,
Kumar Arcot

ERS Settlement Problem for movment type 102

Hi All,
There is an scheduling agreement created with ERS check mark. When I do the goods receipt in MB01 against 101 movement type, MRRL is triggering for the goods movement. When I reverse the goods movement in MB01 against 102 movement type, MRRL is not triggering for the few goods reversal. The settings are correct because in few cases it is settling properly.
Please let me know what are settings will affect the ERS reversal.
Appreciate your help!!!
Regards,
Raja

Raja,
There is nothing special you need to do in order to make ERS work with reversals. What makes you think ERS is not paying attention to the reversals?   Here are a few things to consider:
-   Is it possible that the ERS check was not present on the line items when the reversal was done?
-   Go to the EKRS table to see if the reversals are present in the table.   The entry could be slightly different depending on when the 102 was done and by what transaction.    If the 102 was done after the 101 was settled and done with MB01 then it'll be it's own movement.   However if it was done via MBST or MBRL - it may appear to be the 101 entry when in fact it is the reversal.
If there is no entry in the EKRS table that indicates the ERS flag was not checked when the reversal was done. Or the reversal has already been settled.
Regards,
Sandra

ERS Settlement transaction MRRL exclude items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for