ESB Console turns Request/Response message into One Way message

Hi folks,
have come across a strange situation and wondered if anyone else had come across this. Maybe it's fixed as part of a patch set.
I'm running SOA Suite 10.1.3.1.0 on Windows.
After I've created and deployed a Request/Response service (either RS or SOAP Invocation Service) if I go to the ESB Console and click on "Apply" in say the Definition tab, my service turns into a One Way service.
This then causes null pointer exceptions when I run my process, as you might expect.
If I redeploy from JDev and leave the "Apply" button alone I'm back in business.
Is this something that anyone else has had a problem with?

Hi.
I would recommend you to install version 10.1.3.3 of SOA Suite
http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/ias/10133/ias_windows_x86_101330.zip
http://download.oracle.com/otn/linux/ias/10133/ias_linux_x86_101330.zip
Also, use the JDev 10.1.3.3
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/jdev/htdocs/soft10133.html
They are supposed to be much more stable.
After using the new release, let us know if you still run into this problem.
Denis

Similar Messages

How to agregate multiple response messages into one output message

Hello,
My issue is to send a request to a webservice, and as response i got a message with maximum 100 records. Then if there is more records to retrieve i will have to re send a request in order to have the remaining records until there is no records to retrieve.
So how can i send back in the end of the loop only one output messsage with all records retrieved ?
Thank's for all.

Hi Aheriz,
If I understand correctly, you can receive a response from webservice with maximum 100 records in it and if there are more records against the request you sent, then you will have to call the webservice again. How do you decide if there are more records?
Do you get it in some field present in response?
So you can decide based on it whether to make another call/multiple call to webservice (the loop condition depends on number of records left/100). And about sending one output, you have to aggregate and for that you can use send pipeline .
Sample is available in the SDK Folder under Pipelines/Aggregator:https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa561747.aspx
Maheshkumar
S Tiwari|User
Page|Blog|Good
to know for every BizTalk Developer

Append two message into one message in BPM

hi,
i have to receive two different outbound message interface in fork step. as soon as two message received
i have to append those message to one message as below;
A message
1001 AAAA BBBB CCCCC
1002 DDDD BBBB DDDDD
B message
1003 CCCC 1321 12213
1004 DAFD DDDD DDDDD
1005 EDDD DDDD DDDDD
target message for C
1001 AAAA BBBB CCCCC
1002 DDDD BBBB DDDDD
1003 CCCC 1321 12213
1004 DAFD DDDD DDDDD
1005 EDDD DDDD DDDDD
and then i have to send C
is it possible on BPM? i think not mapping issue and correlation.
how can i append two abstract message to one abstract message?
thanks
venjamin

hi all,
BpmPatternCollectMessageToBeCollected in basis in ir is not multi-row, this message type structure is just for individual message..
in my case, source message type can be received multi record in row in once.
so, what i want to say is interface mapping regarding
appending two abs message into one inbound message for transformation.
if it is possible, we may not need to container operation step because we already have bundled message in target abstract message. we can just send target abstract message.
if it is not possible, how do you map to use in transformation step? and configure container operation?
container operation should be appened from one structure message into one multi message.
does it make sense?
thanks
venjamin

Question: map the whole source message into one field in the target.

Hi Friends,
Is there a way to populate the whole source message into one of the fields in the target message?
I am trying to do this in message mapping. Guide if this could be done in any other way or is there a way to do it in message mapping.
Waiting for your valuable guidance,
Regards,
Lakshmi

Hi Friends,
I tried to convert the source message into a string using XSLT mapping. It was successful, however i need to have the source message in XML format and not in any other format. This is because, I am mapping the source XML into a field in a WSDL. The webservice requires the entire source message be inside a field called "Request" in the WSDL (it is like XML inside another XML).
Is there any way to do this? Please suggest.. (Im not good at java programming... may be i dont know)

ESB and one-way messaging

When I create a one-way message (Ie. a message with no response) the esb has to return a message according to the http protocol.
However the content type of this is 'application/soap+xml' when i talk SOAP 1.1 to the ESB.
As far as I know the content-type 'application/soap+xml" is only allowed for SOAP 1.2.
This raises a exception in my service consumer.
Does anyone know about this problem?
null

This is the input message to ESB:
Host: vm-bpm.krifa.local
Content-Length: 452
SOAPAction: "execute"
User-Agent: Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.0.1
Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:lock="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/AUTOPRO/MESSAGE_DELIVERY/LOCK_MESSAGE/">
<soapenv:Header/>
<soapenv:Body>
<lock:InputParameters>

<lock:I_ID>10</lock:I_ID>

<lock:I_INITIALER>klh</lock:I_INITIALER>
</lock:InputParameters>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
And this is the output from ESB:
HTTP/1.1 202 Accepted
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:05:25 GMT
Content-Type: application/soap+xml
Server: Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.3.1.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server
Message was edited by:
khebbie

Combining two messages into one

Hello,
I have a mapping issue, I have a business process in which I have to combine two messages into one.
To do so, I have defined a message mapping in which there are two source message types, and one target message type.
When testing the message mapping in the IR, it works fine, but when I define and test an interface mapping with that same message mapping, I receive this error message:
"Cannot produce target element /ns0:Messages/ns0Message1/MY_IDOC_TYPE/MY_SEGMENT. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd."
What am I doing wrong ?
How am I supposed to combine two messages into one ?
Thanks,
Elad.

Hi Elad,
Just see if you have included both you source message interfaces and one target nessage interface correctly in while doing your interface mapping.....
The most common mistake made when we do scenarios which include combination of two source message types into one target type are:
- we forget to include both the source message interfaces.
- or we interchange between one of the source message interface with the target.
Just see if either of the 2 is aplicable in your case and just activate all components as and when you create them..
Regards,
abhy

Errormessage: "one-way message without WSRM header"

Hi,
I tried to implement an asynchronous WebService on a PI 7.11 SP04 system as service provider.
When calling this async Webservice with SOAP-UI I get the following error response:
"WSRM:NW/WSRM: Consumer sent a one-way message without WSRM header. This is not currently supported."
When testing the webservice with WS-Navigator it runs fine.
Does anyone know, how to call an asynchronous Webservice in PI 7.11 ?
I tried it with the following Message:
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:mail="http://my_namespace" xmlns:wsrm="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/rm">
<soapenv:Header>
</soapenv:Header>
   <soapenv:Body>
      <yq1:MT_my_massagetype xmlns:yq1="http://my_namespace">
        <MailAddress>my.name.ad.email.de</MailAddress>
      </yq1:MT_my_massagetype>
   </soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Regards
Christoph

Hi,
first thanks for the helpful notes, but I have a few more questions
I try to call the WebService in direct way, so I have no channel.
From WS navigator the WebService call is OK, so I don't understand this, if WSRM is not supported here.
Meanwhile I created the corresponding consumer WebService in the same system and called the provider WebService with this consumer WebService directly and this was also fine. This is not a very meaningful szenario, but it runs
Do you have experiance in testing with SOAP UI (3.0.1) ?
When I'm testing the WebService in old way (without WS-RM) I get the error message '.. no WSRM header ...'.
When just marking the flag 'Enable WS-Reliable Messaging' I get no response and a null pointer exception.
Can I use the same XML as seen above or are WSRM-header-Informations necessary in XML ?
Regards
Christoph

Writing test case for One-way messaging returns fault

Hi All,
We are using latest 11.1.1.7 version of SOA Suite. There is a SOA composite which gets data feed from external party using the one-way message exchange pattern to store the feed into the database.
i.e. from (Web Service component ----> Mediator ----> DBAdapter). The composite uses one way returns fault pattern. This basically returns only the faults when they occur and seems to work as expected. I can see any runtime errors (like database not available returned to the Mediator and the caller of the web service). However, I am unable to write a test case for the fault returned in case of database adapter unable to connect to database as the 'Emulates' tab is disabled.
Happy to provide more details if required.
Thanks

Hi,
By looking at the error what you have got it indicates that you are not catching the specific fault which is thrown by bpel1 in bpel2.
Regards,
Santosh Hemashekar

Merge several support messages to one support message

Hi everybody!
We are facing a problem with the clarcity of support messages.
Normally different problems (support messages) belong to the same topic (background), respectively can be solved with one answer. So, is it possible to merge several support messages to one support message to develop more clearness?
Currently we are referencing the tickets via text (for example: see ticket 8000000976) and that is not very satisfying.
Thanks for your answers!
Regards
Daniel Köß

Yes. You can if you have executed ONLY the action "Confirm Message to SAP"(without message status "Confirmed").
There are two ways to confirm the message to SAP.
1. Option1:
    Choose the message status as "Confirmed" and execute the action "Confirm Message to SAP".
    This confirms the message to SAP as well as confirms to Solution Manager System also.
    So you cann't make any more changes or cann't execute no more actions.
2. Option2:
    Just execute the action "Confirm Message to SAP" without choosing any status.
    This confirms the message to SAP but not on support desk system(solution manager system).
    So you can make changes or can execute any action including "Confirm Message to SAP"
    one more time.
Let me know if you are still not clear.
Regards,
Sanjai

Problems with mapping after bundling messages into one XML-file

Hi all,
Case 1: one DebMas IDoc ==> XI ==> one XML-file : no problems with mapping.
Case 2: several DebMas IDoc's ==> XI ==> one XML-file : problems with mapping.
Explanation:
Incoming DebMas IDoc's:
Businesspartner 1 : no Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM).
Businesspartner 2 : Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM).
Businesspartner 3 : Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM).
Businesspartner 4 : Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM).
After bundling into one XML-file:
Businesspartner 1 : no Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM).
Businesspartner 2 : no Customer Master Partner Functions (E1KNVPM) !!!!
Businesspartner 3 : Customer Master Partner Functions of Bp 2 (E1KNVPM) !!!!.
Businesspartner 4 : Customer Master Partner Functions of Bp 3 (E1KNVPM) !!!!.
All the payloads of the IDoc's are correct.
In the message mapping we use a Container for the Partner Functions (shown as below)
Is this a serious bug in the mapping of SAP XI ?
Does anyone knows how to solve this serious problem.
E1KNVVM -
> Partner_Container
E1KNVPM -
> Partner
PARVW -
> ParnerRole
KUNN2 -
> PartnerNumber
Regards,
Theo Pijlman

Hi,
Example:
Input idoc has field F1 with occurence 0..unbnd
My input values for field F1 is
1
none
2
3
Say, I have a mapping, F1---->TargetF1
In the target only 3 TargetF1s will be created for the values 1,2,3 and nothing will be created for the field F1 with no value.
To overcome this, use collapse contexts.
F1->collapsecontexts>TargetF1
This way, the TargetF1 fields created will have the following values:
1
blank
2
3
Collapse contexts makes sure that a target is created, even if there is a context change specified at the source.
Hope this is clear.
Regards,
Smitha.

Best way to turn a looped region into one regular region.

Hello,
This is going to be a very easy question for someone to answer.
When I record a small part (say just a 2 bar lick) I then pull the end corner to loop it.
FANTASTIC.
But I would rather view it on the main window as one solid region, rather than seeing the little ''bite marks'' that make it look like an accordion, or a bunch of regions pushed together. To me, that looks messy.
I have yet to find a way to quickly turn it into one region. Would the best way really be to bounce in place, because merging or joining does not seem to work for loops.
Again, I'm sure it is something I'm missing here that it quite simple.
I'm still trying to get my logic legs and put my PT ones on hold for the time being.
Cheers.

Bounce in place.

I want my Mail to not make a thread out of all related messages into one. I hate it.

With my new Mac came the new Mail. Now I hate it. It puts everything on to a single thread of messages. And if you open the thread and there is more that one unread message, you can probably skip one of the unread.
I exactly what happens in GMail.
Does somebody know how to undo this?
Thanks.

Open Preferences for Mail
Open Viewing
Deselect Include related messages
Allan

How do I convert a very long text message into a multimedia message

How do I convert a very long text message into a multimedia message

Well, you didn't mention Mac, but to my knowledge, TouchCopy works on both platforms. And, my understanding of the OP was to send each one individually, whereas WiseJD was referring to selecting them all so you could copy them all and send, rather than emailing each individual piece.
It wasn't that I thought it was rude, but that it was a complaint about something that someone said a year ago. You did not come here to ask a question, or indicate at all that you were looking for a solution to a similar question. It was just that you came on, slammed a response and left it at that. Those of us that take the time to answer people's questions as volunteers and users just like you. If you spend a great deal of time here, you will see a lot of different types of questions/comments that can get on your nerves. Here is a link for TouchCopy and it does work on both platforms. http://www.wideanglesoftware.com/touchcopy/

How to convert javascript alert message into an Inline message in Apex Page

Hi All. Im new to Apex.
Present Approach -
I have a dynamic report region developed using API's like APEX_ITEM etc. I am using java scripts to validate these dynamic items and popup alert messages as shown below -
function ValidateNotObservedCB(p_row_num)
var v_row_num = p_row_num;
var v_not_observed_cb_status = document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked;
var v_not_in_district_cb_status = document.getElementById('f_notindistrict_'+v_row_num).checked;
var v_program_code = document.getElementById("f_program_code_"+v_row_num).value;
if ( (v_program_code.length>0)&& ( document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked==true ))
     bold alert("You have already entered a program code.") bold
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked=false ;
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).value='N';
} else if ( (v_program_code.length==0)&& ( document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked==true )) {
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).value='Y';
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked=true ;
} else
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).checked=false ;
     document.getElementById('f_notindistrict_'+v_row_num).checked=false;
     document.getElementById('f_notindistrict_'+v_row_num).value='N';
     document.getElementById('f_notobserved_'+v_row_num).value='N';
Question/Issue - How can I convert these alert messages into Inline messages to show on the page, similar to what appears when we do Item Validations in APEX.
Waiting for responses as this is an urgent requirement.
Thanks in Advance,
Madhu

Hi,
I did with jQuery small sample
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=40323:36
Page HTML header is
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function(){
var lImg = $('<img alt="" class="pb" style="float: right;" src="/i/delete.gif"/>');
var lMesg = $('<div id="MESSAGE" style="border-top: 1px solid rgb(142, 170, 142); border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(142, 170, 142); padding: 5px; background: rgb(235, 241, 235) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; width: 450px;" class="t14notification"></div>');
$('.pb').live('click',function(){
    $x_Remove("MESSAGE");
$('#SUBMIT').click(function(){
    if($('#MESSAGE').length == 0){
      $('#t14Messages').children().append($(lMesg));
       $(lMesg).append($(lImg));
       $(lImg).after($('#P36_NOTIFICATION').val());
    }else{
       $('#MESSAGE').text('');
       $('#MESSAGE').append($(lImg));
       $(lImg).after($('#P36_NOTIFICATION').val());
</script>I do not know does it help. Using this depend much on theme, defined class and IDs.
Br, Jari

Can an ESB used as Request - Response service system

We have a requirement where a ESB should reply back.
Eg: If a value of given field is
A: route message SvcA to and return it reply to invoker
B: route message SvcB to and return it reply to invoker
Both these can be achived but other requirement is
If the value is neither A nor B then
Transform request to response schema and return to the invoker.

This is exactly where you should use the esb for
route and filter the data.
so if understood you correctly, you should just add the routing rules to the routingservice, and depending on the content (so use a filter in the routing rule) you could either route and transform to either one of the svcdA/B

ESB Console turns Request/Response message into One Way message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for