ESS Team Calendar comming as Table for some users

Hi,
When the users navigate to ESS -> working Time -> Leave request -> Team calendar
Then for some users it coming as Table, while for other it is coming as proper chart(graphics).
We want the it as chart(graph) for all users.
Any suggestions?
_vishal

It seems that accessibility switch is on for the users for which the chart is not coming properly. In the UserAdministration Search for the user for which the chart is not coming properly and uncheck the accessibility flag.
Thanks
Prashant

Similar Messages

ESS Team Calendar not showing peers list

Hi,
When an user logsin with his user id, he is able to see the list of his subordinate from the org. unit of which he is the holder in his ESS Team calendar.
Rather I have a requirement that his peers should be shown.
The configuration done is:
Rule Group     Mode          View Grp.     Group of Organization          Group
00000001     Approval          u201C     MSS_LEA_EE
00000001     Attendance Over     u201C     MSS_LEA_EE          PPOME_P
00000001     Administrator     u201C                    MSS_LEA_EE          PPOME_P
00000001     Request          u201C     MSS_LEA_EE
00000001     Team View           u201C     MSS_LEA_EE          PPOME_P
In Table V_TWPC_V
View ESSDIR
View Name ESS: Direct Employees
Eval. Path for Root Objects SAP_MANG
Function Module Root Objects
Evaluation Path Objects ORGASS
Function Module Object Set
Initial Evaluation Depth 0
Is that I am missing some configuration?
Thanks,

In Table V_TWPC_V
View ESSDIR
View Name ESS: Direct Employees
Eval. Path for Root Objects SAP_MANG
If you use SAP_MANG, only subordinates will be shown
try using ORGASS or WF_ORGUN or have a custom one developed in T77aw and assign it here where you only see
peers in this very table

ESS - Team Calendar tootip

Hi
We have configured ESS Leave Request application in such a way that employees can submit both their absences( annual leave etc) and attendances (flexi time).
In ESS Team Calendar, employees can view the absence/attendace of another employee. While hovering on the absence/attendance of another employee in Team Calendar, we see that tooltip says "Absent " even for attendace types. How can we change the tooltip so that it says "Absent " for absence types and "attendace" for attendance types ??
Thanks

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I checked the program mentioned by you. As far as I could understand the program will display "Absent" only using the method fill_tooltip_compact for all other employees.
I am trying to implement the Badi PT_ARQ_REQ. The system already has a standard implementaion. So I created a custom implemtentation.
When I am activating the implementation(through spro only) it is giving me a dump. The system is not allowing multiple implementaion for PT_ARQ_REQ.
Please help me. How do I implement this Badi.
Regards,
Rashi

Team view data not getting refers for some user

Hi,
We are facing an issue in team view app for mss, manager's are seeing details of employees not belonging to their Org Unit/ data not getting refreshed. This seems to be the Cache related issue where the data of perviously logged in user is displayed to the current user till browser cache are cleared manually.
User don't have permission to clear browser cache. Is there any work around.The issue is coming only for some users.I have enable the 'ABAP HTTP Security session Enabled' property of the system used.
Regards
Pallavi

Hi Karthik,
in the first view I execute the BAPI and in the second view I show the results. In the second view I also submit the modified data via another BAPI.
As I execute and display result of same BAPI in two different views I have bound the same model node to both of these views. Let me give you some sample code for understanding what have I done.
In the first BAPI's search action handler I have written:
          Zsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input input = new Zsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input();
          wdContext.nodeZsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_Input().bind(input);
          input.addT_Version(new Zsr_Packnr_Field_Values());
          input.addT_Zsr_Genbr(new Zsr_Packnr_Field_Values());
input.setZsr_Gmc(globalMaterialCode);
          input.setZsr_Mrc(mrc);
          input.setZsr_Ctry(country);
          input.setZsr_Dc(distributionChannel);
          input.setZsr_Div(commercialSegment);
wdContext.nodeOutput_Validate().invalidate(); //as u suggested
          wdContext.currentZsr_Packnr_Validate_Components_InputElement().modelObject().execute();
          wdContext.nodeOutput_Validate().invalidate();
In the second BAPI I just display the output node from the same Model context node (its mapped to the second view too).
But as I said whenever I update some values in the result set and submit it the data gets submitted properly. But when I press the search button again, the previous set of data gets populated, not the just updated data.
If anybody has some idea on why the second time search BAPI execution still shows the previous set of result it will be a great help to me.
Thanks for all your help.
Shubhadip

Mac Multiple Users - How to exclude for some users?

Hi,
I have BBDM installed on a Mac with multiple users. A couple of those are children so I have Parental controls turned on, and BBDM excluded from their available list. However, when they log in BBDM is trying to sync artwork or something and continues to request administrator passwords many many times. When I install the BBDM in the Destination Select segment it asks whether to install for all users, but there is no choice to exclude for some users.
Is there a way to do this?
Thanks
Paul
Torch 9810; PlayBook 64g; iPad1 64g; iPad2 64g; iPhone6 64g Passport
Provider Bell (tablets all WiFi)

Hey luapekralc,
Welcome to the BlackBerry Support Community Forums.
Thanks for the question.
When installing BlackBerry Desktop Software for Mac you only have the option to install for yourself or all users. My apologies, you can not choose selected users to have access to this application.
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Cheers.
-ViciousFerret
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Adobe Premiere Pro CC launches for some users, but crashes for others.

I am troubleshooting an issue in a college computer lab. Adobe Premiere Pro CC launches perfectly for some users, but crashes for others. All computers are joined to a domain. The program launches successfully under faculty and admin accounts. It launches under my student account and will launch for some students in the class. There are, however, some students who cannot get the program to launch. Each time it fails when attempting to load ImporterQuickTime.prm.
For these students, the following error appears:
Adobe Premiere Pro CC has stopped working
Check Online for a solution and close the program (Tried this nothing seems to come of it)
Close the program
I clicked View problem details
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: Adobe Premiere Pro.exe
Application Version: 7.2.2.33
Application Timestamp: 532c3999
Fault Module Name: dvaui.dll
Fault Module Version: 7.2.2.33
Fault Module Timestamp: 532bed86
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 00000000002d31c1
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 3272
Additional Information 2: 32722596c6b4441ac0840ed9743cbfbb
Additional Information 3: 3e22
Additional Information 4: 3e2260f0a53760c20f23c7e2675c1736
I did check Quicktime and it is not updated to the most recent version. However, if it was a result of Quicktime not being up to date, why can some accounts launch the program while others cannot. I have also updated the graphics driver on one computer. No change. I compared my student Active Directory account to that of one student who could not launch the program. They are in exactly the same place in AD and therefore have the same permissions on the domain. This is a puzzling issue and the instructor is getting frustrated. Any help or suggestions with this matter would be greatly appreciated.
-Barb

I have no idea, other than what I said about the program's design requirement for an Admin account and "sometimes" problems on any other account
About the only thing I can suggest is a "remote control" chat session... when a student with a non-working account is having problems
Creative Cloud chat support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html

MAM application is not working for some users

Hi All,
Tha MAM application is not working for some users.Different users have different workcenters other than that I dont see any other change. When I run MAM30_090_GETLIST in the backend I can see the no of customized users.But I cant see same no of users in the MEREP_207 table for the Syncbo MAM30_090 and strcture id TOP in the middleware. There is a data when I checked under worklist monitor for that user. But neither the MAM application nor MAM data is downloading to that device.
If I use different user on the same device I can see the MAM application and MAM data.
What could be the wrong in this case. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Mobile Client:MI 70 SP 15 Patch 0 Build 200802280918
Middleware:SAP NetWeaver 2004s with Patch leve 15
Backend:SAP ECC 6.0
Application:MAM 3.0
Thanks and Regards,
Ameer.

Hi,
from your description the source of your issue is quite obvious: some of the MAM users configured in spro are not configured properly.
For T01 SyncBos the number of TOP records in merep_207 MUST be the same as number of headers returned by an appropriate getList FM in the backend.
You need to solve this before you can go any further.
Reason why a record is not recorded in MEREP_207 - getdetail failed for whatever reason. So execute MAM30_ML_getdetail for each of the users that is not replicated in the middleware and check if there are errors in RETURN table. If there is no error - one of the common reason for replication fail is when there are records in item tables that have duplicate primary keys.
Regards,
Larissa Limarova

How to Block Account member in input reporting for some users?

Hi experts, i need to know if is possible to block input of values for some Users in the Account Dimension so that some users can input value in the report but other user cant do it.
I try to do this from "member access profile" but this option only allow you to define access right for one specifict parent o member.
I mean, is posible to asigned to Account Dimension a Propertie type "OWNER" like ENTITY?
For example: one user must to input value for the Account member "CASH", but other user dont, however i have to show the same input reporting for both users.
I hope understand the question, im sorry about my english
thank you in advance
Ignacio Vazquez

I would think you could do one of the following:
Either set account as a secured dimension. You would then define security profiles for all account groups and assign those to your users / teams as appropriate. Would take a while to setup initially, but if your users don't change that much it shouldn't be too difficult to manage once it's done.
Setup different input templates that only showed the accounts you wanted each group of users to see. Put the templates in different site folders and assign access to those sites as required. users would then only have access to open the template applicable to them. Would require that you basically make duplicate copies or your current template, modify and save to different site folders which could become a pain if the template requires changes (since you would now have to make the same change multiple times).
Setup a macro in the current template so that you need to enter a password to unlock the send commands for the respective accounts. I don't know if it can be setup to support multiple passwords - assuming it can, password 1 would unlock all accounts, password 2 would only unlock CASH accounts, password 3 would only unlock LIABILITY accounts, etc. You then distribute the passwords to the users as appropriate.
Hope that helps.

Outlook Anywhere not working for some users

Hi All,
I am having a strange issue today with a customer -
Outlook Anywhere has been enabled on their Exchange 2010 environment, but it doesn't work for some users.
Using the ExRCA I have been able to identify the following error on the users who are unable to connect:
"Testing the MAPI Mail Store endpoint on the Exchange server."
"Attempting to log on to the mailbox"
Mailbox logon returned ecLoginPerm 1010. You don't have the correct permissions to log in to the mailbox.
EMSMDB Status: ecLoginPerm 1010
Elapsed Time: 225 ms.
On users that are able to connect it goes through the ExRCA without any issues.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Jack
Testing the MAPI Mail Store endpoint on the Exchange server.
An error occurred while testing the Mail Store.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 333 ms.
Test Steps
Attempting to ping the MAPI Mail Store endpoint with identity: outlook.mg.com:6001.
The endpoint was pinged successfully.
Additional Details
Attempting to log on to the Mailbox.
An error occurred while logging on to the Mailbox.
Additional Details
Mailbox logon returned ecLoginPerm 1010. You don't have the correct permissions to log in to the mailbox.
EMSMDB Status: ecLoginPerm 1010
Elapsed Time: 225 ms.

Hi,
I notice that this issue only impact "some users".
I suggest double confirm whether the Outlook Anywhere configuration set correctly on Outlook client. Pic as blow:
Thanks
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

How to restrict access to views for some users in the app?

Hi SDN!
I have an WD application wich embedded in the portal. Appication has 2 iViews (and 2 pages respectively). These iViews consist several views connected with each other (e.g. one view provide list data, second view is add/edit form for this data). I need to restrict access for some users for view with add/edit form. I can't make separate page for this view.
What I've done:
1) create yet another UIContainer for this view in main window and embed view to this container. It was be done for create separate iView for form.
2) in the portal I create iView for this form but don't embedd in any page.
When I try to call my form from list data (that is one iView from another) I get exception:
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.services.exceptions.WDRuntimeException: duplicate usage of view .MyCarRentalAddCity
Is there a way to get needed functional?
Thanks,
Lev

Hi,
do you need to remove the IView from the portal menu or do you just want to make a View container in your WD application invisible if the user doesn't have the rights to see it.
If so, you could create your own roles on the app server:
You need to create a new class that extends NamePermission like:
import com.sap.security.api.permissions.NamePermission;
public class ApplicationAccessPermission extends NamePermission {
 * @param name
 public ApplicationAccessPermission(String name) {
 super(name);
 * @param name
 * @param action
 public ApplicationAccessPermission(String name, String action) {
 super(name, action);
Also, you have to create an Action.XML file that looks like this:
<BUSINESSSERVICE
 NAME="com.vendor.administration">
 <DESCRIPTION
 LOCALE="en"
 VALUE="actions view usage"/>
 <ACTION
 NAME="View Permission">
 <DESCRIPTION
 LOCALE="en"
 VALUE="Show view"
 />
 <PERMISSION
 CLASS="com.vendor.utilities.ApplicationAccessPermission"
 NAME="ShowView"
 />
 </ACTION>
</BUSINESSSERVICE>
If you have created these to files in your packages, you can access this function like:
IUser user ;
try {
 user = WDClientUser.getCurrentUser().getSAPUser();
 if(user.hasPermission(new ApplicationAccessPermission("Show view"))){
 wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.VISIBLE);
 }else{
 wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.NONE);
 }catch (WDUMException e1) {
 wdContext.currentV_UIElement().setViewVisibility(WDVisibility.NONE);
 e1.printStacktrace();
You have to bind the ViewVisibility attribute of the context to the View Container you want to hide.
The applicationAccessPermission you defined in the XML File will be visible in the UME Manager of you J2EE engine. With this action you can create a new role and group that you can map to the users that should see you view.
But, the exception you get is because you have embedded one view twice, which is not possible.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Dennis

PPT unable to open in browser for some users

PPT unable to open in sharepoint browser for some users?

Hi,
If the issue only occurs to some users not all, I’d recommend you check client issue and permission issue. For client issue, you could try compatibility view in IE.
If there is more than one WFE servers in your environment, then please ensure SharePoint Shared Services is started on all WFE servers.
Here is a link which provides solution to similar issue, for your reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2028346/en-us
If it doesn’t work, please provide more specific information about error message to narrow down the issue.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Increasing Email Size Limits for some users

Hi All,
For some users (management) i needed to arrange that they are able to send bigger files then the default 10MB limit to each other.
I used this procedure to do so,
https://www.simple-talk.com/sysadmin/exchange/increasing-email-size-limits-for-your-high-profile-users-in-exchange-2010/
In a nutshell:
Set Global Transport Org. Config to 200MB
Set Transport Send and Receive connector to 200MB
Created a Distribution group adding the MT members and me (for testing)
Created a transport Rule for the 10MB limit for all users and exception for the distribution group
(Believe me, i am not happy with the 200MB size limit)
All seems to work but i have one issue that i cannot tackel or maybe it is by design.
-Managemant can also send big files to all
users who do not have this privelige, this is not someting i want, sending 100MB+ attachments to over 150 users.
Is this by design or do i mis something?
Thanks,
Ron

Hi RonGielgens,
Attachment size in exchange has to be set on
Global settings
Connectors (send and receive connectors)
Mailbox
The global settings will affect all the others. of course connectors will affect specific servers and mailbox one user. You have to set the global to the absolute max size you want to allow in your organization.
after you do this you will need either to set the 10MB on each mailbox
Get-Mailbox | Set-Mailbox -MaxSendSize 10MB -MaxReceiveSize 10MB
Then change the limit on specific mailbox
or another way is to create a transport rule that will reject the email if the attachment size it > 10MB unless the sender/recipient is the required user or group.
so basically create 2 transport rules
1. reject messages sent to anyone with attachment > 10mb unless the recipient is userX
2. reject messages sent from anyone with attachment > 10mb unless the sender is userX
Normal case it should not allow.
Thanks, MAS
Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Services for object box not visible for some users

Dear All,
PM module experts please help. In equipment master transaction IE02 in left hand top corner we get box for SERVICES FOR OBJECT which is useful for attaching external documents like word and excel. but problem is it is not visible for some users. Our security/authorisation team has also done some check but didn't get any solution.
anybody knows the reason why there is no box availabe?
Thanks
SR

Dear Siddhartho Raha
I think this problem related ABAP work,this problem very general problem,first refer any note availble or search throgh any class in SE24
note are like this way 492331,this is not related to your query but same like it is and also may be
Due to an error in the coding, it was possible to link a Word document to a Document in IE01. Because the data cannot be saved in transaction IE01, the linked document is lost after leaving the transaction.
Hope this may helps you
Prem.

How to restrict a user group of SQ01 for only execution for some users

Hi,
   I would like to know if it is possible to restrict the access to SQ01 transaction for some users. I would like that these users have only execution access to some queries associated with an user group.
   Do I have to associate the user group to the users I want to have access to it? How can I do it=
   Do I have to associate the queries created on SQ01 to the users? or it is enough to assign the users to the user group where the queries are defined?
   Do I have to associate the infosets created on SQ02 to the users? or it is enough to assign the users to the user group to which the infosets are associated?
   Thank you,
   Luz D.

I suggest you do a web search on SQ01 and SQ02. That'll bring along SQ03 as well.
There's so much information available on the web that there's no reason to repeat it here.
[try google|http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=SAPsq01sq02&meta=]
Jurjen

Taking long time on First login for some users

Dears,
We are facing very strange issue in our ECC6 server.
For some users when they login put userid and password it takes 15-20 min to login and sometimes give time out.
but after first login it works fine.
If I remove roles from those user and assign them SAP_ALL or one or two roles,they also work fine.
One more thing some other users having same authorization are working fine.
One solution of this issue I found to delete the user having problem and copy it with user who is working fine.
But not getting root cause of the issue and permanent solution of the issue.
Please suggest.
Shivam

We just experienced the same problem after updating our SP-Stack.
Some users were experiencing a long logon time, and a long time to return to the Session Manager screen. Changing to the SAP Menu instead of the User Menu cleared the problem for those users, but they no longer had quick access to transactions that were in the User Menu, and not in the Favourites.
Note 203617 was not the answer for our problem, but it did point us in the right direction.
After upgrading our SP Stack last Friday, it appeared that some of the roles in the Customer Namespace (ie, zRoleName001) had inherited a copy of the Logistics or Accounting SAP menu trees. This meant that users with those roles ended up with a User Menu which contained the 10 or so transactions that are assigned to their roles, and additionally, the entire Logistics or Accounting Tree which contain 35,000+ items. In transaction SM66, users who are waiting for their logon to complete are shown doing a sequential read of table AGR_HIERT.
To correct this, I removed the Logistics and Accounting menu trees as appropriate from the User menu of those roles in PFCG. Users that use the User Menu can now logon normally.
This is what I did to troubleshoot:
* Pick one user that is experiencing long login times, and have them change to the SAP Menu instead of the User Menu. If their logon time improves, open transaction SE38, and run the program EASY_ACCESS_NUMBER_OF_NODES.
* Specify the user's account and click on Execute.
* If the program times out, chances are that they have an enormous number of items in their User Menu - continue with the next step.
* If the program finishes, look at the number of Menu Nodes for that user - Note 203617 says that a User Menu with 1000 or more items is considered "large" and will degrade logon performace as the User Menu buffer is constantly swapping in and out.
* Note each of their each of the user's roles from SU01, then check the Menu tab for each of those roles in PFCG to see if any roles are adding large sections of the SAP menu.
* If necessary, maintain the Role's Menu items in DEV, and transport to TEST, then Production. BE CAREFUL to ensure that the Users list is not modified when transporting the changes into Production, or the Role will become de-assigned from your Production users, and your users will hate you when they become unauthorised to open transactions.
* Once the User Menu is back to normal, the user can change back to the User Menu and everyone should be able to logon normally.
Hope this helps.
Edited by: Chris Pope on Apr 21, 2010 1:09 PM

ESS Team Calendar comming as Table for some users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for