Essbase-behind-the-firewall problem

The essbase server (6.2) is behind the firewall. All the needed ports are open (according to support recomendations). I can log on, start and use the first application, but after i start the second one (no matter which) and try to save the outline or retrive the data in SS Add-In essbasey displays consecutive error messages:1) Invalid login id - please login again2) Invalid login id - request [EssGetClientSettings] failes3) Invalid login id - request [adListObjs] faied.Thus i can only use 1 application at a time %((.Please help.Alex

The Excel Essbase addin was not designed to work nice with firewalls.. The new Essbase Spreadsheet Services was, however, designed to work through a firewall. Additionally, our product, ActiveOLAP for Essbase 2.0, was also designed to work through a firewall as well (and features a nearly exact Excel interface w/o using any Excel components (and without any Microsoft licensing issues).Tim TowApplied OLAP, Inc

Similar Messages

Portal Installation from behind the Firewall

Hi
I'm tryin to install portal but my db is behind the firewall , how to aolve this problem ???? i cant use tns connect string
here is what i have in my tnsnames.ora
IDB =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = tcp)(PORT = 1610)(HOST = 192.168.0.2))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = tcp)(PORT = 1521)(HOST = 172.16.10.49))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = dolphin)
(SOURCE_ROUTE = yes)
)

Hi
My firewall support SQL , because I can connect to my database from 9ias server outside the firewall but my problem is only with Portal Installation , because I cant use tns connect string , I can only use the server name and the port , and I can only connect using tns connect string because
I have added to entries one for my firewall
and the other one is for db ...
any help please

I have just installed Lion OS and Face Time encounters server problems on sign up. I have sought the firewall problem without success and even temporarily turned off firewall with no success.

I have just installed Lion OS and Face Time encounters server problems on sign up. I have sought to rectify the firewall problem without success and even temporarily turned off firewall with no success. Any ideas?

Some folks have discovered that changing their DNS service fixes FaceTime connection issues.
The ideal way is to configure your modem/router with DNS service, but often settings in System Preferences/Network/Advanced/DNS on your Mac will override the router settings. Try either of these;
OpenDNS
208.67.222.222, 208.67.220.220
Google Public DNS
8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4

Download site points to behind-the-firewall site

On page http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/htdocs/wls_main.html we find at least one link (displaying "see this document") which points to a site behind the firewall (http://fmwdocs.us.oracle.com/)
Amusingly, that protected link is the one that tells us what to do when we get the software.
QA reigns supreme!

Thanks Hans - it will be updated to point to:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e14142/guimode.htm#BABHJJEG

GTalk from behind the firewall using Python

Friends,
I'm a student accessing the net from behind the University Firewall and it does not allow us access to GTalk (some crappy policy). When I was using Windows, about a couple of months back, I used to run Python server and to tunnel thru it to access Internet and GTalk in particular.
Now Google does not have a dedicated GTalk client, . I tried fiddeling with some settings in iChat and Adium but couldn't get it to work.
Can anyone help in this respect.
highly hopeful,
Aditya
Macbook Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2.0Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo, 1Gb ram, 80Gb HD

Hi,
This forum may be of more help
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=755
5:11 PM Sunday; February 25, 2007

Lync Director behind the firewall

Hi,
Has anybody deployed the Lync director behind of the firewall? Does anybody have a list of the required ports, flow direction and destination which need to open for the Director? These I found between Director and rest of the Lync infrastructure (two ways):
TCP / 80
TCP / 443
TCP / 444
TCP / 5060
TCP / 5061
And for the CMS:
TCP / 1433
TCP / 1434
But do I miss something?
Petri

Check port requirement for single director at:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204648.aspx
Check port requirement for scaled director pool with DNS and HLB Load Balancer at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj205179.aspx
Check port requirement for scaled director pool with Hardware Load Balancer at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204983.aspx
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

ALCS server behind the firewall/on-premise?

I was wondering if there were any plans to offer the capabilities of ALCS as an on-premise solution?

Hi Rick,
Not at this time. However, we are always looking to shape our roadmap based on feedback. Any reason why this is a must for your business case? Or why a single-tenant or a hybrid deployment (on-prem edge to handle auditing, auth, etc., but the core service is still in the cloud) won't suffice?
Thanks,
Fang

FWM 01009 (null):firewall problem?

Hi Guys,
I have a problem with a DMZ installation and the firewall settings
Here's the situation.
On our internal network we have installed the servercomponents of BOXI Edge 3.1, which seems to be running fine.
We have a seperate Webserver with Tomcat 5.5 installed on it in the DMZ zone. Via Wdeploy I have deployed the war files on it (according to the wdeploy deploy document).
Whenever I want to logon to the CMC on my webserver machine, my login screen is appearing fine, but after I hit logon, I receive the error message FWM 010009 (null), a communication failure has occured. According to our firewall team, all ports are open in both directions. They have executed a trace and see that the BOXI Edge server is sending back packages, but that in that package should be an end communication order.
I still have (an older) VM with Edge 3.1 behind the firewalls (thus internally), from which I can access my newly installed machine in a glance...
As an extra test we have installed a complet Edge version on the Webserver as well. Communication on the webserver is OK, but as soon as we try to connect to the server behind the firewall, it goes wrong and the error appears.
So here comes my question, is there anyone who can give me a clue where it goes wrong?
Is it correct to say that it is a firewall problem?
If all ports are open on the firewall, communication shouldn't be a problem, isn't it?
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Jorn

Hi,
we have appointed a static port 4982 to the request port.
According to our firewall guys, no communications is coming from the request port. Even before the request port can answer, the port 6400 is sending a FIN package (termination package) to the application resulting in the error message.
They say that all ports are open and that it's not a firewall problem... However when I communicate within my LAN environment this is not a problem...
Can please someone help me out?
Regards,
Jorn
Edited by: Jornvdd on Sep 29, 2010 12:08 PM

Java chat client behind the proxy or fire wall

i am developing the chat application useing java.net.*.but i am not able to get connectivity behind the firewall or proxy on the java client.pls help me out

to guarantee easy to use, no problem chat applet then you will need to have the chat server running on port 80 and the client use http request/response system
first problem is that the applet will have to have been delivered from port 80 on the same ip# so you will either have to use Servlets or write your own web server with chat facilities
you will need to maitain persistent/ pseudo persistent http connections for the server to deliver messages to clients, you can assume that a connection will remain open for ~ 5 minutes after a request from the client
use HTTP/1.1 for reliable Connection: keep-alive and request/response pipelining
with all that in place your client method is...
register and send GET /chat <wait for upto 5 mins>
if there is client activity send POST/chat <wait for upto 5 mins>
if the above waits timeout send GET/chat <wait for upto 5mins>
server method...
accept GET/POST requests from client
if there is chat to deliver, reply to most recent request from client
if you recive another request before the previous one's reply is used, send a No Content reply to the previous request

Two servers (serverSocket) behind the SAME firewal !?l

Hello !
I dont know if this is the right forum for this qusetion,
and maybe the question is really stupid, but ...
I made a little client/server application, just to
play around with sockets and serverSockets.
It works fine, but now i ask myself:
What happens, if there are two of my servers running on two
different computers in the SAME LAN behind the SAME
firewall/internetgateway, and both are listening on the SAME
port ?
F.e. if the extern IP of this LAN/(its gateway) is
204.556.234.123, and a client in the internet is connecting
to it on the port, on which the two servers behind the firewall
are listening, WHO'S ANSWERING ?
(If this port is set to "open and forward" in the firewall)
The one with the shorter patch-cable ? ;)
How is it possible for the client to differenciate
this two servers in that LAN?
The only logical solution i found is that this two servers
have to listen on different ports,
but i think there has to be another explanation and/or solution.
Do i have to take care about situations like that in my
server-application ?
I have the feeling that i have to...somehow.
OK, you see i dont know much about this...
i would be very thankful for every hint and explanation.
Thank you very much,
greetings,
huni.

F.e. if the extern IP of this LAN/(its gateway) is
204.556.234.123, and a client in the internet is
connecting
to it on the port, on which the two servers behind the
firewall
are listening, WHO'S ANSWERING ?
(If this port is set to "open and forward" in the
firewall)Whichever one the firewall is told to forward it to!
The two computers running your server have unique addresses on the internal network. The firewall will forward incoming connections to one of those addresses. Maybe it can do some simple "load balancing" by forwarding some connections to one server and some to the other, but still, any particular connection will only go to one server.

An application on both sides of the firewall

Hi,
we are building an Apex application that is mainly to be used in-house (behind the firewall). However, some reports and forms need to be available to users outside the firewall. These users will log in, there are no public users.
Keeping the "outside" forms/reports up to date with changes can be made manually, but the outside users should be created on the inside and mirrored out.
The outside users will enter small amount of data and this must be lifted inside.
We have been looking at Streams. Would a full schema replication work? For instance sessions and things...
Or would it be better to just replicate the user tables to the outside?
We plan to use the same database link Streams use to have the inside database fetch any updates made by the outside users.
Has anyone done anything similar?
Kind regards
Tomas Albinsson
Stockholm, Sweden

While holding down your shift key you can click on the dock's divider and drag it to either side of your screen. From an Apple Pro Tip-of-the-Week found here.
Best regards, Andrew99
iMac 1 GHz Flat Panel 15" PPC 768 MB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Internet Edge Router and the Firewall

What is the best way to monitor an Internet Edge router from the Internal network behind the Firewall?
We want to pull more information from the edge router like netflow. We can use SNMPv3 and ACLs to keep the router secure.
But I am looking for the best config to keep both the router and firewall as secure as possible while still allowing us to monitor performance and faults.
I am running an ASA and a 2821.

I'd start with locking down the router configuration if you haven't already. Cisco Configuration Professional (free) offers a nice GUI for analyzing and delivering all the necessary commands to secure the router.
Getting Netflow from your router doesn't add much more than getting it from your ASA.
If you're querying through the firewall to the routers using SNMPv3 (and have deleted the v1/v2 communities) that's one good step. The only other thing I might suggest is sending syslogs to your management system from the router. To do that you'll need to add an access-list and probably a NAT entry to your firewall to allow the incoming syslog traffic.
Most important beyond all the technology is to make sure that your people follow a process to regularly analyze and act upon the information being reported and gathered. Without that all the rest isn't worth the time it take to implement it.

Can't access locally hosted website from behind the router, but can outside

Hi, I recently had to be moved from ATT DSL to U-verse. At home I host a small non-commercial website with a domain name registered, listening on port 80. I can access the website if signed in to my employer's VPN at home, but not from any machine in my home network. This worked for a few days after switching, but then suddenly stopped working. Any idea what's going on and if it can be fixed? Since I can get to it from VPN, I assume folks outside of U-verse can see it. How about folks with U-verse as their ISP? The web site is http://www.jtlanguage.com. Thanks. -John

I suspect that the U-Verse RG is smart enough to see that the IP address you are attempting to route to is itself, and it is not applying the port forwarding to traffic coming from internal addresses as it is from external traffic arriving (since the traffic is coming from behind the firewall, not outside it). If this is the case, you could put a hosts file entry on your local machines to identify the internal IP address rather than the external IP address for the web server, so that the computers go directly to the machine behind the firewall.

Connect Oracle 10g client to the Oracle 10g database behind a firewall

I need to connect an Oracle 10g client to the Oracle 10g database (windows server 2003 box) behind a firewall. I ran into this problem: Port redirection. Port redirection requires the Oracle client to connect to the database using a different port (usually a randomly selected TCP port) than the default or originally configured one. If there is no firewall between the server and the client, port redirection will not affect the actual connection. However, if port redirection does occur with the server behind a firewall, the client will be likely to suffer from a connectivity failure. The reason is simple: the newly assigned port based on port redirection is often blocked by the firewall. Such failures are not uncommon on Windows platforms.
I don't know how to stablished an unique TCP port.
I Enabled USE_SHARED_SOCKET on the Oracle database server, windows registry. Acording to what I read,that will force the server machine to share its port 1521 and thus all clients will stay on that port when connecting to the database. Noticeably, port redirection will not occur with USE_SHARED_SOCKET enabled, but that's true in oracle 8 or oracle 9. In oracle 10g this solution doesn't work.
I will apreciate any help about this. Please!
Thanks in advanced.

Three solutions in order of preference
1 Use Connection Manager on the server (only installed using a Custom Install). This will tunnel all traffic through a single port. It will also allow you to configure allowable nodes
2 Set up shared server to use a fixed port. Disadvantage: shared server has overhead and the number of connections is limited
3 Use shared_sockets. Disadvantage: when you stop the listener everyone is disconnected.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

ACE problem - bridge mode - behind a firewall

Hello
We are having problems with one of you ACE context, this implementation was done by a supplier and I am trying to troubleshoot it.
The clients and the servers are on different subnets, there is a Nokia firewall in the middle. The firewalls are setup on a cluster.
Connecting to port 7072 is taking at least 30 seconds. If I move the server into the VLAN in front of the ACE, the connection is instant. So it does indicate a problem on the ACE.
The client IP is .99.11.
The VIP is .100.62 and the server node is .100.12.
Running the capture command I can see the following behavior:
1. The client initiates the connection to the ACE Vip
2. At the same time it looks like a second connection is initiated from the client to the server node
Please see attachment.
Is this a normal situation where the connection is duplicated?
Does this interface setup look correct?
Is the bridge mode the correct setup in this scenario?
interface vlan 10
bridge-group 2
no normalization
mac-sticky enable
access-group input PERMITALL
service-policy input VLAN10-INTER-MMPM
no shutdown
interface vlan 15
bridge-group 2
no normalization
access-group input PERMITALL
no shutdown
interface bvi 2
ip address 192.168.100.7 255.255.255.192
alias 192.168.100.6 255.255.255.192
peer ip address 192.168.100.8 255.255.255.192
no shutdown
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.1
Many thanks,
Damian

Thanks for replying James,
I am sure I configured the capture only for VLAN10 which is in the VIP side.
But you are right, it looks like is showing both VLAN10 and VLAN15. So that is one of my theories out of the window! :)
This is a new installation, still on the testing stage. So it would be good time to make changes.
Do you normally implement a routed setup behind a firewall? Rather than a bridgedâ¦.
It is quite a small setup:
â¢ Traffic is coming from a separate local subnet
â¢ Traffic is not coming from the internet so it does not required a NAT
â¢ We need 1 VIP listening on two ports
â¢ The backend servers are four Linux boxes
Thanks again,
Damian

Essbase-behind-the-firewall problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for