EssbaseCluster-1 in 11.1.2 - giving users filter access

I am attempting to grant users filter access to an Essbase application in 11.1.2.1
In Shared services I am right-mouse-clicking on the application under the EssbaseCluster-1 node, and selecting "Assign Access Control", but no users are displayed when I click the "Search" button. I have previously provisioned some users with filter access in HSS, but no success.
Any suggestions folks ?
Edited by: Xansaman on Aug 1, 2011 8:41 PM

OK its as simple as the user having a higher level of access to the cube via membership of a group !
Adding a user with just server access & filter access to the cube enables "Assign Access Control" to operate properly !

Similar Messages

Photoshop cs6 crashes with "appcrash - module ig75icd64.dll; no problem for a local admin user however. i've tried giving specified user full access to photoshop.exe and set it to Win XP compatibility. how do i fix this without giving user local admin acc

photoshop cs6 crashes with "appcrash - module ig75icd64.dll; no problem for a local admin user however. i've tried giving specified user full access to photoshop.exe and set it to Win XP compatibility. how do i fix this without giving user local admin access?

Danny,
Topic or subject titles should be clear, pertinent and concise so that individual users can tell at a glance if they can help or not.
That field is not for attempting to fit your entire question in there.
Please keep this in mind next time you post. Thank you.

Retrigger output witout giving users VA02

Hi,
My client is doing a GRC implementation and in the process of their roles remediation, we came across many non-Customer service folks having access to VA02 to re-trigger outputs which was causing SOD violations with their other functionality.
Is there any other ways for the users to re-trigger output for sales orders without requiring VA02 to do it?? This same issue existed in VL32N and VF02 but we were able to find the solution via VL33N and VF31 respectively. For delivery outputs, we gave users VL32N but inactivated the main auth object M_BEST_BSA that was also conflicting via ME23N by giving users SODs for access to change purchase orders. So, users go via VL33N and as long as other objects are active for activity 02, users can do re-trigger output to receive a purchase order or delivery note without actually going into VL32N.
And for billing docs, they can do VF31 to retrigger output instead of VF02. But I haven't found a solution for VA02. Is there any other VA* transaction that will allow them to re-trigger output without the ability to change a sales order? Otherwise, we got SOD conflicts across all business areas.
Will greatly appreciate any feedback from any1 else who has encountered this or has a solution.

Giving user-specific friendly name to network printers

I was referred to this forum from
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-desktop/giving-user-specific-friendly-name-to-network/f759c9d6-faa5-4f9a-96c9-b105fd418b20
I'm a mere user in an enterprise situation. The printers all have cryptic names (alphanumeric strings) which I'm sure have meaning from the perspective of infrastructure management, but absolutely no meaning for the purpose of a mere user trying to
keep track of which printer on the computer corresponds to which physical computer out in the cube farm. Is there a way for a mere user to create an alias name for the network printer? If it involves administrators of any sort, it will likely not
happen, so a solution that requires only user privileges is preferred. However, I can retain the information for a procedure that requires administrator privileges so that I can opportunistically ask them to do it when the circumstances are right.

No you can't create a local printer that uses a Local Port in the format
\\printserver\printshare on XP as a standard user. This task requires admin access on XP
You would need Windows Vista and greater.
You will not be able to rename the printer connections name in any Windows operating system unless you are admin on the print server at which point you would break existing connection to the server.
A local printer is the better way to go in Windows 7 or 8.
Alan Morris Windows Printing Team

Using a Report Filter without giving users access to "Design" mode

I have a report in which I use the filter bar to provide my end users the ability to use a drop down menu to switch between different months worth of data. However, I have been asked to disable the ability for users to access the Design mode. I have been unable to come up with the right security settings to allow the report filter while disabling the Design mode. Does anyone have any suggestions to this problem?
BO XI 4.0 Patch 9
Thanks very much for your help

Hi,
I'm familiar with your issue - described here BO4 navigate the available object in READING MODE in webi
and also here: Hide/Disable DESIGN MODE on WebI (BI4)
I've every reason to believe this is currently not possible. You may want to vote on the existing Enhancement Requests in Ideas Place, or create your own
Regards,
H

How to authenticate user when accessing a servlet in WLS6.0

          In my current project , i need to authenticate user when accessing(executing) a
          servlet deployed in WLS6.0. I tried to add
          <auth-method>
          BASIC
          </auth-method>
          in the web.xml.
          Also in the default fileRealmProperties file, i set up the ACL for
          acl.execute.weblogic.Servlet.myServlet = the user
          also i have disabled guest access in my config.xml.
          after all these, the servlet can still be accessed freely.
          do i miss something ? what is the right way to set up it in wls6.0
          thanks a lot
          hyliu


The steps required are documented at:
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs60/quickstart/quick_start.html
          mark
          narendra wrote:
          > hi all,
          > I had written a simple servlet. I would like to know the steps to
          > be followed to run the servlet.
          > What i did is i kept that servlet class file in the default directory
          > and added the servlet path in the web.XML.
          > but when i try to run the servlet its giing me 404 error.
          > Can any one help me out by giving the detailed steps to be followed as I
          > am new to Weblogic6.0
          >
          > Thanks in Advance,

Is there an app or way for multiple users to access contact info?

We are a small business that maintains a contact list of leads and clients in a MS word file. We can access those word files via our iphones, but only view them. Is there an app or way to have one person in the office maintain a database of leads and clients that a few users can access via iphone and simply touch the phone number to call them or touch the address for directions/map?
We know we could each input the info in each of our phones independently, but that is dumb - given someone in the office maintains such info as part of their job and updates it weekly/monthly whatever. Do you see what I mean? I cannot believe there is nothing out there for this.
Basically we are looking for a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number. I think that is what I would call it.

I can access phone numbers directly from our client list in word.
And that solves your quest looking for "a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number"?
Wow... I never know Microsoft Word could do so much!

I am trying to allow guests on windows to connect to shares on my Lion server but it keeps asking for a password for guest. I have allow guest users to access this share enabled but it still does not work.

I am trying to allow guests on windows to connect to shares on my Lion server but it keeps asking for a password for guest. I have allow guest users to access this share enabled but it still does not work.

Ditto. Guest accounts shouldn't have a password. No way to enter one in System Prefs...

User cannot access

hi,
i am new to this forum,i have one doubt,
user cannot access one authorization field , how can i analysis this issue, i know su 53 for find the authorization field...but user have 100 roles... how can i find the which role and object...plz help me..

Hi Hassan,
This is not the correct category. This message should be opened under security item. However, you can find the whole required authorization objects list, by using ST01 trace.
Best regards,
Orkun Gedik

How can I restrict more then one user to access the table?

Hi !
I have a problem and two solutions and I am a bit confused as to
which one is the best one and/or can there be any better way of
handling the problem ?
Problem : I have to update a key field of a table when I update
it in the form 5.0 screen. I am basically doing a maintenance of
a table and if a certain field is updated then the change has to
be reflected in two more tables. But the issue is that the field
is a part of the key in those two tables. So all I can think of
is that I need to insert new set or rows for that new value of
the field and delete the old set of records for old values of
the field.
There are two ways of doing it;
1.One option can be to explicitely define two cursors separately
and fetch the values in them one by one and then insert the new
records and then delete the old records in both the tables. This
I feel will be a cumbersome process both in terms of processing
time and the coding.
2.Second option I was thinking can be to create two flat tables
(without keys) and insert the values in them and update the
changed field there and then insert the rows in the respective
tables. Delete the old records in the main tables and delets the
records in these flat tables. This is a bit more faster and
easier to predict and code. This seems to be a better option for
me.
Any comments on these ?
In both the cases I was thinking of making some provision so
that more then one person can't update the table simultaneously.
Since if there are more then one persons doing the processing
then some inconsistency might creep into the whole process.
This is easier to do in the second process as if I check the
data in the flat tables and if there is some data then I can
presume that some one is doing the processing and I can ask the
other person to hold for a while. But in this case how can I
stop more then two people to simultaneously check for the empty
table and start inserting the record ?
I was just thinking of having a sepatare table having only one
field and this will be a key field and as the process begins the
process will insert a fix value say 'Y' in the key field and at
the end of the process the record will be deleted and this way
we can restrict the user to access the process more then one at
a time..? Since you can't have same value of the key in a table
more then once.
Any better way of handling it will be deeply appreciated.
How about locking the table at the begining and releasing the
lock at the end ? Will there be any issue in that? since I am
inserting and deleting the rows in the same transaction.
Comments welcome,
Shobhit
null

How about performing the update IN the database using a stored
procedure?
By using non-database fields on your form to get the
information, you can then call the procedure in the database to
perform the updates. If an error occurs in the procedure you
rollback, if necessary, and send a message or status back to the
form. If it succeeds you might wish to commit and then re-
execute the form's query -- using either the original key values
or the new key values...
null

How can i save music and pictures so all users can access them?

how can i save music and pictures so all users can access them?

Hi, this should be your answer as for sharing music. For photos though, I would assume you can do the same thing. Hope it helps!
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1203

How can I allow users to access SQLPLUS?

Hi everyone,
I have been charged with the task of creating an Oracle server on a CentOS VM. Installation and configuration is complete and SQL is working fine for the database admin user "oracle." I copied the environment variables to the .bashrc file for "oracle" and SQLPLUS starts without a hitch.
Here is where I need a little guidance...
I need to create basic Linux user accounts that will have access to the database, so they can then in turn log into their SQLPLUS accounts. The problem is, all of the database files and software are in located in the user "oracle's" directory. This means that no one but "oracle" and root have access to these files because they are the only ones with proper permissions.
Before I put a ton of time into this, I thought I would pose these questions to the Oracle Linux community:
1) Could I enable a specific Linux group (ex. "Oracle Users") to have access to the main database folder or possibly all folders along the path? I am hoping this would allow any users I put in the group access to the folders, and essentially the SQLPLUS application. (here is ORACLE_HOME=/home/oracle/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1)
2) If that is not an option, will I need to make a completely new database and locate it in a location that all users can access?
I understand that my first idea may not be the SAFEST method, but this is only for a small class of students learning how to use SQL and writing queries. There will be no sensitive information at risk. This would be a quick fix until I learned more about Oracle and how to use it.
Thank you everyone.

It certainly is rather a question for the General Database forum, though I doubt you will get a lot of happy replies for such a basic question.
You can use / as sysdba OS authentication through SSH or using the server console, provided the user's account belongs to the "dba" user group. For remote connection through sqlnet you need create a $ORACLE_HOME/dbs/orapw$SID password file.
If you would like to know more about this:
Connecting / as sysdba is used for OS authentication. It ignores password credentials stored in the database and allows any user belonging to the OSDBA system group to connect to the database. Connections as sysdba will always connect to the SYS schema of the database, regardless of any username or password specified. Using OS authentication relies on the BEQ protocol, which connects to the database directly, without using the Oracle Listener process.
The "oinstall" group will give access to the database software repository. There could be different oracle home installations, each with a different oracle user/owner like "oracle_prod1" and "oracle_prod2", but both users must be able to read/write the shared oraInventory, in which case both users must have read and write access to the oraInventory directory, hence the oinstall group.

How do I allow another user to access my pictures, etc?

Hi
still getting used to the Mac feel, after switching over from Windows, and I have a question that I can't seem to find an answer to.
I have the following issue:
Under my account, I have all our family photos and documents. I have also set up a user account for my wife. When she logs on, she can't access our photos, etc., because she has no read/write rights. (Which is logic, since they are my "private" folders.
I have then logged on myself, used the "info" button on the respective folders in order to give her user the rights to access my folders, but I can't seem to "allow everyone" to access the folder(s). What are the settings I need to use?
Thanks
MN
Imac 24" Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Hi,
I have tried to recreate this myself, and your right even after changing ownerships and movie the iPhoto library to the public folder ( Harddrive/Users/Sharing) the second account is still not allowed to access the library. This is strange behaviour because moving the iTunes Music Library to Sharing does allow all users to access the library.
All I can suggest is that you deselect the option in iPhoto preferences (Advanced) to "copy files to iPhoto library" then store your photos in a folder that resides in the Harddrive/Users/Sharing folder - then your wife can use the import command to add them to her copy of iPhoto (she should also deselect the copy to library option)
Regards

User cannot access redirected Documents folder, but can connect to share in Windows Explorer and access folder on server

I am in the final stages of a cross-forest migration. Users have Windows 7 workstations with redirected folders on a Windows Server 2012 box running in the old forest. User accounts were not migrated. The accounts in use have always
been in the "new" forest. One of our challenges was the large volume of data in redirected folders. I made sure users in the target forest had continued to have access to their redirected folders in the old forest and robocopied
the entire users share, copying the permissions with the files. By doing incremental robocopies, we can get a final copy done now in about six hours. The plan was simple: copy the files, do an incremental copy every night, on the night of the cutover
change the folder redirection policy Documents path from
\\oldserver\users\%USERNAME% to
\\newserver\users\%USERNAME%. The policy is configured to NOT copy user files from the existing folder to the new redirected folder. Everything was going well until I tested the policy change. After the folder redirection policy is updated
and applied, the user cannot access the private Documents folder. For example, user Chester Tester logs on as ctester. I open Windows Explorer and click the Documents shortcut. I see one subfolder, which is subfolder of Public Documents.
So I can look at Public Documents but when I click on the Documents folder (Under the Documents library link) I get an access denied error. Now for the kicker, if I open another Windows Explorer window and edit the address bar to
\\newserver\users\ctester, I can navigate the Documents folder tree and see my thousands of documents. What the ....?
I'm hoping this is something really simple to fix!
TIA

HI Vivian,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, the path in Group Policy Folder Redirection Root Path was updated to
\\NEWSERVER\users. I had planned to point this to the distributed file system, so the first used was actually
\\domain\dfs\users. To simplify things I have backed off to copying to just a normal share
\\newserver\users.
We are using BASIC folder redirection and we create a folder for each user under the root path.
We did not want the policy to move content, as we were seeing users requiring 15-20 minute logon times (or higher) after the policy is changed.
Grant the User exclusive right to Documents - Disabled
Move the contents of Documents to the new location - Disabled
Related folder settings
Video - Follow Documents
Music - Follow Documents
Pictures - Follow Documents
Now when I change the folder redirection from old server to new server I now have TWO My Documents folders in the user's redirection folder on the server. The redirected Documents points to an empty folder set. The copied folders with all user
data are there, but folder redirection refuses to recognize the original folder.
I am looking at the full view of the folder, nothing hidden, so I'm wondering how a folder can have two subfolders with the exact same name. For now, I just want the redirection to move from the old server to the new server properly. I deleted
the new My Documents folder, rebooted the user's workstation and tried again. The behavior repeats itself, i.e., a new My Documents folder is always created when the redirection policy is changed from the old server to the new server. The environment
has about 1500 users with approximately 1.3TB of data in the redirected Documents folders. OUCH!

How can I export an entire album to my desktop so any user can access my photos?

Is there an easy way to export photos from my iPhoto library so that other users can access them without needing a Mac or iPhoto?

But if it's a big album, be sure to create a new folder on the desktop first, to export them into. Having hundreds of individual photos on your desktop will slow your computer to a crawl.

EssbaseCluster-1 in 11.1.2 - giving users filter access

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for