Etherchannel in 2950T and 2960G

I read many articles in Cisco webpage that i can make etherchnnel between normal ports in two switches catalyst.
Can I make an Etherchannel using two uplink ports on a Catalyst 2950T and two normal ports on a Catalyst 2960G?.
Thanks

I don't know of any restrictions on which ports you can use on these boxes...

Similar Messages

Trunk Port for 2950 and 2960G

Hi Guys,
I have tried connecting 2 switch using a trunk port in able for VLAN to run on 2950 switch, 2950 and 2960G, but the problem is, it keeps going up and down when I check the logs. The client experienced intermittent network connection by this problem. What seems to be the problem here? I already replaced the cables.
Here is the config:
They are connected via cross-cable
2950:
Int f0/24 --> 100mbps port
switchport mode trunk
2960G:
Int G0/1 --> 1Gbps port
switchport mode trunk
*I believe they will auto negotiate their current speed and duplex.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers!

Yes, they have the same settings.
Here it is:
int g0/2
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:23, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5d18h
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 21000 bits/sec, 21 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 495000 bits/sec, 180 packets/sec
5180581 packets input, 1243581478 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 62493 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
2 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 30119 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
179416978 packets output, 2694243274 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
int f0/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, media type is 100BaseTX
input flow-control is unsupported output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5d18h
Input queue: 2/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 504000 bits/sec, 180 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 22000 bits/sec, 22 packets/sec
179389710 packets input, 2690183405 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 26481884 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
4510 input errors, 3566 CRC, 243 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 17984825 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
5180070 packets output, 1243477217 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

Gigabit EtherChannel between 6509 and Intel Pro/1000 MTx

I am trying to configure gigabit etherchannel to connect our backup server with a 6509. The Intel Pro/1000 MT nic in the server has two gigabit ports and supports teaming using LACP. I have configured two gig ports on the 6509 as layer 2 etherchannel ports ( channel-group 2 mode active ). The switch ports always show up as disabled. I can't seem find any documentaion on connecting server to switch using etherchannel ( although the Intel Pro MT nic documentaion does mention it ). Does anyone have experience doing this ?

We always just use load balancing on the Intel NICs and do nothing with the switch but make sure that the ports are in the correct vlan.
We have been using this for over 3 years flawlessly.
Our switches are a Cat4006 and Cat4506.

Etherchannel between wism and C6509

Hi, when we adding vlans on wism
Thats vlans do not appear in configuration on etherchannel and interfaces.
cisco WS-C6509-V-E Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVENTERPRISEK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXJ6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
WS-SVC-WISM2-K9 7.6.130.0

im find, it's bug https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj96561

Gig etherchannel between 3508XL and 4507R

Anyone out there doing this? I can get the channel to come up, but the 3508 can only seem to pass traffic on whichever link of the two in the channel comes up first. The 2nd link shows no STP running as I expect it should (based on doing this between a 3550-12G and the 4507R). The result is that I lose connectivity to half the devices attached to the 3508XL (the ones whose traffic is trying to traverse the 2nd link, I would guess).
Cisco TAC hasn't been able to help.
Mike

Hi Mike,
That does sound like a STP problem.
Does 'show spanning-tree blocked ports' show that any of the channel ports are blocking (at either end) ?
And 'show etherchannel port-channel' shows 2 ports in the bundle and both up ?
Thats the kind of thing i would expect to see if the channel was not operating correctly, in which case STP would block one port.
Cheers
Shaun

Etherchannel/Portchannel bandwidth and speed - Cat6500/Nexus

I am looking for the documents describing bandwidth and speed on the Portchannel/Etherchannel interfaces.
For the port channel build out of 4 x 1Gb interfaces on the WS-X6148 or WS-X6548 blades we will have 1gb of bandwidth.
For the port channel build out of 4 x 1Gb interfaces on the WS-X6748 blades we will have 4gb of bandwidth.
When you run "show int po1" you will see 40Gb of bandwidth and 1Gb of speed for both cases (61xx/65xx and 67xx blades).
Port channel build out of 4 10Gb interfaces will show 40Gb of bandwidth and 10Gb speed.
What would be real bandwidth on this port-channel?
And the other question would be if there is any way to see real bandwidth for the Port-Channel? Let say to see 4Gb on the port channel on4 WS-X6748 ports.

levter wrote:I am looking for the documents describing bandwidth and speed on the Portchannel/Etherchannel interfaces.For the port channel build out of 4 x 1Gb interfaces on the WS-X6148 or WS-X6548 blades we will have 1gb of bandwidth.For the port channel build out of 4 x 1Gb interfaces on the WS-X6748 blades we will have 4gb of bandwidth.When you run "show int po1" you will see 40Gb of bandwidth and 1Gb of speed for both cases (61xx/65xx and 67xx blades).Port channel build out of 4 10Gb interfaces will show 40Gb of bandwidth and 10Gb speed.What would be real bandwidth on this port-channel?And the other question would be if there is any way to see real bandwidth for the Port-Channel? Let say to see 4Gb on the port channel on4 WS-X6748 ports.
6148 is a special case due to the line card architecture. For other use cases when you bundle interfaces into a port-channel you do get an aggregate bandwidth equivalent to the sum of the bundled ports. Whether you will be able to use the full bandwidth depends on how traffic is hashed over the links and that is more or less related to the diversity of your flows along with the underlying hashing algorithm. Over time advancements have been made in the actual hashing algorithms so you need to choose the best algorithm for your specific environment.
A word of advise will be to understand the architecture of the product you are implementing bundling on just to be aware of any corner cases. There is no easy way to identify limitations imposed by hardware other than doing your homework first.
Atif

Nexus and 2960g connect issue

Hi All
I am having issue while connect the cisco 2960G and nexus 5000, i have attached the network setup. so kinldy check and update how i can proceed further.
Regards
Sudharsan.R
91+8220088865

Hi Sudharsan,
Nice working with you again
So, your issue is that the 2960 switches are seeing the Nexus device as one. What you have to do is to create a port-channel between the 2960 and nexus devices. That should solve your problem.

6500 - Etherchannel with HP and ESX

I have a couple questions that I cant find the answer to (which surprised me).
Do all NIC(s) in a team need to be plugged into the same blade (switch), or is it technically a single stacked switch?
HP Server NIC teaming and ESX Nic teaming docs have different hash methods. (see links below).
How do you reconcile this or does it matter? Should you specify load-balancing method per switch module and plug all nics in a team into that specfic switch?
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1004048
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/lan-switching/etherchannel/98469-ios-etherchannel.html
Thank you for any responses,
JT

JT,
One other thing you should look into is that sometimes you don't need to have portchannles towards the ESX hosts, because they use NIC teaming on and when one logical NIC fails the traffic simply shifts to the other logical NIC without loosing a ping packet. The same thing happened when we disconnected a physical link. We did this testing with Dell Servers, 2ks and 6ks. The 6ks do not run any portchannel, just simple trunk and it works really well. Now, you are using 6500 and HP and it maybe all different, but just FYI and if you want to test it.
HTH

Etherchannel on esw520s and intervlan routing

Hello
I have a couple of uc520s
2 - esw - 520-24p
2 - esw - 520-48p
1 - 3560x switch
the 3560x is our core switch. my uplinks between the core and the 4 esw. i was able to get the etherchannels configured and "working" however the fact that the vlan 1 on the esw is the native vlan, i change the native vlan to be vlan 20 and i'm really struggling with this
I have 5 vlans configured on the 4 esw switches data, voice, management, servers, guest.
i can't get the intervlan routing to work properly on the esw. If i configure any vlan on the 3560 i have access to the management vlan
however if i connect my pc to any port on the esw switches i don't have access to the management vlan at all. for some reason intervlan routing isn't properly working. if i want to have access to the management vlan on the esw switches i need to assign a port on the esw to be on the management vlan
if i use the common scenario, all the ports being voice + data, i can't manage any of the switches at all
what else should i do to get this fixed ?
is it something on the ether channels or am i missing something else ?
thanks

HelloI have a couple of uc520s2 - esw - 520-24p 2 - esw - 520-48p1 - 3560x switchthe 3560x is our core switch. my uplinks between the core and the 4 esw. i was able to get the etherchannels configured and "working" however the fact that the vlan 1 on the esw is the native vlan, i change the native vlan to be vlan 20 and i'm really struggling with thisI have 5 vlans configured on the 4 esw switches data, voice, management, servers, guest. i can't get the intervlan routing to work properly on the esw. If i configure any vlan on the 3560 i have access to the management vlanhowever if i connect my pc to any port on the esw switches i don't have access to the management vlan at all. for some reason intervlan routing isn't properly working. if i want to have access to the management vlan on the esw switches i need to assign a port on the esw to be on the management vlanif i use the common scenario, all the ports being voice + data, i can't manage any of the switches at allwhat else should i do to get this fixed ?is it something on the ether channels or am i missing something else ?thanks
Hi,
Can you put up your network in diagramtic representation view, do that it will be helpful for more understanding.
Ganesh.H

TCP Window Scaling supported on 3750G and 2960G switches?

We have the 3750G with the IOS version 12.2(35)SE5. Does this IOS version and switch support the TCP Window Scaling detailed in this doc? The doc says Release 12.2(8)T. And I don't see the 3750G or the 2960G platforms listed in the doc. I'm guessing they're not but rather than guess, I thought I'd ask. Thanks
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t8/feature/guide/tcpwslfn.pdf

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
The doc says you may see better performance.
Indeed you may, but the doc also notes "Do not use this command unless you clearly understand why you want to change the default value.".
The two common situations where there's possible benefit to increasing the device's TCP receive window are: to allow faster FTP/RCP downloads to the device or to support quicker BGP bulk transfers. The former is limited by write speed to flash and the latter might be unusual to need > 64 KB for BDP.
Also, BTW, if you do find a need to work with scaled TCP receive windows on a Cisco device, you probably also should enable (optional) SACK.

10G etherchannel between 4510 and 3850 - NO Link

I'm pulling my hair out on a simple issue, and I could use some advice. Thank you, in advance.
I've got a core 4510 switch with 2 12-port 10GE SFP+ modules and my closet has a stack of 3 3850-48p with 2 4-port C3850-NM-2-10G modules.
I'm using 4 SFP-10Gb-SR SFP's to create an ether-channel between these two switches.
The fiber between them is OM4 cable, and OM3 patch cables.
The distance is about 90 Meters.
I've got po8 created on the 4510 through te1/8 and te2/8. On the 3850, i've got po8 created on te1/1/4 and te3/1/4. My problem is that I cannot get a link light at all between these ports. Absolutely nothing indicating when i hook it up. I've tested all the patch cables using loop backs and they all respond. I can even loop back through the complete length of the fiber and i get a link light then also. When i hook them up together, the log on the 4510 starts throwing Rx power low alarms with an Operating value of -29.5 dBm.
I've had Cisco's support go through and verify my port-channel configuration, and they found it to be correct.
I'm starting to wonder if there is larger forces at work here. Am i bumping into a compatibility issue?
Any help would be appreciated.

I've removed the interfaces from the etherchannel and tried cross looping. On the 4510 I get no indication from the LEDs. On the 3850 I get immediate indication on the LEDs.
One might conclude, Cisco support included, that the SFPs on the 4510 side were bad and should be replaced. I hesitate to conclude this because, while members of the etherchannel, i get link lights when looping immediately. Its only when setting the 4510 interfaces back to default and outside the etherchannel that i don't get a response.

Etherchannel between 2900 and 7200

Hello,
We have Etherchannel trunk set up between Catalyst 2924 switch and 7200 router. The trunk consists of 2 links with source-based forwarding, STP disabled on switch and on the router. For some reason, we can't achieve load-balancing on the trunk, that is, one link is currently used at 100%, another at 20%. We would like to achieve 50/50 utilization. Is it possible to do?
Thanks !
Konstantine

The Etherchannel trunk consists of 0/11 and 0/12 interfaces.Here's the output from "Show interface" command on a switch:
FastEthernet0/11 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0001.96bb.51cb (bia 0001.96bb.51cb)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 219/255, rxload 49/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 2w6d, output 00:00:40, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5w0d
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
5 minute input rate 19376000 bits/sec, 7347 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 86004000 bits/sec, 8 packets/sec
FastEthernet0/12 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 0001.96bb.51cc (bia 0001.96bb.51cc)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 22/255, rxload 58/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not set
Full-duplex, 100Mb/s, 100BaseTX/FX
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:08, output 00:00:01, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 5w0d
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
5 minute input rate 22747000 bits/sec, 7947 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 8678000 bits/sec, 2548 packets/sec
As you can see, the output rate on interface 0/11 is 300 times lower than on 0/12 and that is our main problem. We have a web farm here (around 100 servers), which is connected via Layer 4 switch to 2924 and then, via Etherchannel trunk, to 7200 router which is default gateway. We tried to use destination-based forwarding (on a switch), but that didn't change anything. The router AFAIK doesn't have any settings to change the forwarding.

Etherchannel Simultaneous Primary and Sub-Interface Config

Hello Cisco Experts:
Question: Can I run layer 2 traffic across EtherChannel and layer 3 traffic simultaneously across the same etherchannel on a subinterface? If not, and considering the background information below, is there an advisable alternative? The documentation I've been reading isn't clear on the subject.
Background
I'd like to split my VLans across (2x) L3 3560 switches interconnected by EtherChannel. I'll use SVI's for the routing - but if Switch #1 SVI must route to another SVI on Switch #2, I'd like this traffic to cross the EtherChannel instead of heading to another L3 Device before continuing its route to the destination switch. (I.E. I prefer direct switch to switch routing.)
Design Preference:
I don't want my etherchannel to become a 100% routed channel.
I don't want to add another connection between the switches - ports are at a premium and budget is tapped.
No access level switches are being used at this time.
Physical Topology
Thank you for your time,
Mike

Hi Jon:
First, I didn't begin to think you were criticizing my design. I just wanted to relieve your confusion.
I tested your ideas this morning, and everything checked out and worked fine. After some more investigation, I remembered why I was asking the question about using EtherChannel with an encapsulated Subinterface & IP Addr. for switch-to-switch routing.
Regrettably it had nothing to do with Intervlan routing, which was working fine. But it does have something to do with routing between the two switches.
Link Failure and High Availability
When I began to consider each case of link failure, I discovered 4 cases of link failure that created problematic results. Two of the cases led to an extra hop, and two of the cases result in a black hole. These ideas were tested with packet tracer to verify I had a problem.
These instances occur because I'm routing 3 vlans out of each switch. Each problem could be resolved by a complete HSRP fail-over to the other switch. But maybe the more elegant decision is a switch-to-switch route with an appropriate administrative distance (preferably using the EtherChannel)?
Note: Primary is the primary WAN connection and Backup is the backup WAN connection.
Scenario 1: Extra Hop
Scenario 2: Extra Hop
Scenario 3: Black Hole
Scenario 4: Black Hole
Let me know what you think the ideal solution is: 1) use HSRP tracking to failover to the other switch, 2) create a direct switch to switch route using EtherChannel Subinterface with IP, or 3) some third option.
Thank you for your time,
Mike

EtherChannel and Vlan trunk

I am trying to have 3 group of 4 GigE ports on the 3560G as a etherchannel and connect to 4 dells.
On gi0/7 - 10 the trunk config seems to work but I am not able to route between the switches. Here is the config ...
Can anyone take a look tell me what's missing? Much appreciated!
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 3422 bytes
! Last configuration change at 00:35:24 UTC Sat Jul 9 2005
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname cisco_switch_b
enable secret xxxx
enable password xxx
ip subnet-zero
ip routing
spanning-tree mode pvst
no spanning-tree optimize bpdu transmission
spanning-tree extend system-id
interface Port-channel1
switchport access vlan 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description To Internet Router
no switchport
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.1.1.8
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
description To Dell_switch_1
switchport access vlan 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
switchport access vlan 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/9
switchport access vlan 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/10
switchport access vlan 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
description To Dell_switch_2
switchport access vlan 6
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
switchport access vlan 6
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/13
switchport access vlan 6
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/14
switchport access vlan 6
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/15
description To Dell_switch_3
switchport access vlan 7
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/16
switchport access vlan 7
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
switchport access vlan 7
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
switchport access vlan 7
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/19
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
interface GigabitEthernet0/21
interface GigabitEthernet0/22
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
interface GigabitEthernet0/24
interface GigabitEthernet0/25
interface GigabitEthernet0/26
interface GigabitEthernet0/27
interface GigabitEthernet0/28
interface Vlan1
no ip address
shutdown
interface Vlan5
ip address 10.1.5.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan6
ip address 10.1.6.1 x.x.255.0
ip helper-address 10.1.5.7
interface Vlan7
ip address 10.1.7.1 x.x.x.0
ip helper-address 10.1.5.7
ip default-gateway 10.1.1.1
ip classless
ip http server
access-list 100 permit ip host 0.0.0.0 host 255.255.255.255
access-list 100 permit udp host 10.1.5.1 host 10.1.5.7 eq bootps
access-list 100 permit udp host 10.1.5.1 host 10.1.5.7 eq bootpc
access-list 100 permit udp host 10.1.5.7 host 10.1.5.1 eq bootps
access-list 100 permit udp host 10.1.5.7 host 10.1.5.1 eq bootpc
access-list 100 permit ip host 0.0.0.0 host 255.255.255.0
control-plane
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
line vty 0 4
password xxx
no login
line vty 5 15
password xxx
no login
ntp server 10.1.5.7
end

Here is an example to configure EtherChannel:
Cisco Catalyst 3560 Switch Configuration
Set MDIX automatic To enable cisco catalyst to accept cross cable and straight cable connection
# config t
# int range g0/1 28
# switchport mode access - Configure Cisco catalyst to normal switch port
# speed auto
# duplex auto
# mdix auto
# end
# show controllers Ethernet-controller
# copy running-config startup-config
Configure Etherchannels support redundancy and network load balancing
# config t
# int range g0/23 24
# switchport mode access
# switchport mode vlan 1
# channel-group 5 mode active
# exit
Configure Etherchannels load balancing
# config t
# port-channel load-balance src-dst-mac
# exit
Configure IP Address:
# config t
# int vlan 1
# ip address 10.xx.xx.xx 255.255.252.0
# ip default-gateway 10.xx.xx.1
# config t
# int range g0/19-20
# channel-group 2 mode active
# config t
# int range g0/17-18
# channel-group 3 mode active
# channel-group mode 3 desirable
# int port-channel 3
# switchport mode access
# config t
# int range g0/15-16
# channel-group 4 mode active
# show etherchannel summary to check Etherchannel port status
Regards,
Junhan
IT Specialist

Etherchannel suspended between Catalyst 4948 and VSS 6506E

Hello,
I describe an issue when i need to performe an L2 or L3 Etherchannel from a Catalyst 4948 IOS Enterprise and 2 xCatalyst 6506E bandled with VSS.
From the VSS Side when i plug cables i see on the physicals and Etherchannel that Physical and protocole layer are up. On the 4948 side,
I see that physical layer is up and protocol and Etherchannel interfaces are down.
On the Etherchannel port summary i see that the port state is supended.
On the first attempt, i have test with a L3 etherchannel on both side using no switchport with two IP addresses one at each side on etherchannel interfaces.
The etherchannel are bundled with LACP mode active and on the second attempt with PAGP mode ON.
The same configured on VSS 6506E work fine with Catalyst 3560E.
Please do you have any idea?

Hi David, when ı type "no mls qos channel-consistency" under port-channel
the issue was solved. But ı am not comfortable with that, Because ı want to use Qos feature
here the "show module all"
GedizCore#show module switch all
Switch Number: 1 Role: Virtual Switch Standby
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
1 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL10478XGB
4 16 CEF720 16 port 10GE WS-X6716-10GE SAL17204RU1
5 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Hot) VS-S720-10G SAL1833YQER
8 16 CEF720 16 port 10GE WS-X6716-10GE SAL16010BSU
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
1 001a.2f08.6930 to 001a.2f08.695f 2.11 12.2(18r)S1 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
4 4c4e.3591.2378 to 4c4e.3591.2387 2.0 12.2(18r)S1 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
5 bc16.655b.a27c to bc16.655b.a283 4.3 8.5(4) 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
8 7081.055f.91c0 to 7081.055f.91cf 1.2 12.2(18r)S1 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
1 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL10478RZ7 2.1 Ok
4 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL172052B2 1.6 Ok
5 Policy Feature Card 3 VS-F6K-PFC3C SAL1834Z3M7 1.3 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard VS-F6K-MSFC3 SAL1827VVKQ 5.2 Ok
8 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL160315JW 1.6 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
1 Pass
4 Pass
5 Pass
8 Pass
Switch Number: 2 Role: Virtual Switch Active
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
2 48 CEF720 48 port 10/100/1000mb Ethernet WS-X6748-GE-TX SAL1442WG3X
3 16 CEF720 16 port 10GE WS-X6716-10GE SAL1441WAPL
5 5 Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (Active) VS-S720-10G SAL1441VWRG
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
2 1cdf.0f90.89e8 to 1cdf.0f90.8a17 3.4 12.2(18r)S1 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
3 f866.f220.3258 to f866.f220.3267 1.0 12.2(18r)S1 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
5 c47d.4ffe.40b0 to c47d.4ffe.40b7 3.2 8.5(4) 15.1(1)SY1 Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
2 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL1442WFR0 1.4 Ok
3 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C SAL1441W1B8 1.4 Ok
5 Policy Feature Card 3 VS-F6K-PFC3C SAL1440VPD4 1.1 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard VS-F6K-MSFC3 SAL1441VWZG 5.1 Ok
Mod Online Diag Status
2 Pass
3 Pass
5 Pass

Etherchannel in 2950T and 2960G

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for