Etherchannel Issues when i apply service-instance
I am trying to do etherchannel between two ports of ME3600 and two ports of Cisco Switch 3400 with either Pagp or LACP. If the ports are with a simple configuration (trunk ports) the etherchannel is up and running properly. But when i apply a simple service instance at port-channel at ME3600, the etherchannel doesnt work properly.
But when the etherchannel is configured with the MODE ON everything is Ok. Is it possible to do evc on port-channel (Pagp/Lacp)?
Thank you All,
Mery
try to remove all ur data not with a back up but manually by syncing your phone with your pc so in this step u can save only your contats and callender in outlook and your photos and videos in a folder
and then restore your iphone again
this can help you to do not backup your settings because maybe there's something wrong with it
Similar Messages
-
Hi,
Background Details :
Linux : 2.6.18-164.10.1.0.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 8 02:34:10 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Web Server : Apache Tomcat 6.0.20
Database : Oracle 10.2.0.4
Utility that we use to consume the Web Service from PL/SQL : JPublisher 10g Release 2 (10.2)
Load Balancer : Citrix Netscaler
We are using the Oracle built in package called UTL_DBWS to invoke the Java web service. The web service is been called through a Load Balancer called Citrix Netscaler.
Load balancer has been configured to use the Source IP mechanism to route the request to the appropriate web service.
Problem :
When invoking the web service from Pl/SQL (with the below piece of code) there are multiple times the web servers are been called which is supposed to be only once. The number of times the call varies is about to 2 or 3.
Query :
Hence we need to understand in general how the UTL_DBWS works ? Are there any issues when the call being made through the LoadBalancer ?
The default time out value while connecting ? If we want to override the default timeout how we can do that ?
Code for reference :
BEGIN
l_service := sys.UTL_DBWS.create_service (
wsdl_document_location => sys.URIFACTORY.getURI(l_wsdl_url),
service_name => l_service_qname);
l_call := sys.UTL_DBWS.create_call (
service_handle => l_service,
port_name => l_port_qname,
operation_name => l_operation_qname);
l_input_params(0) := sys.ANYDATA.ConvertVarchar2(p_dayend_date);
l_result := sys.UTL_DBWS.invoke (
call_handle => l_call,
input_params => l_input_params);
sys.UTL_DBWS.release_call (call_handle => l_call);
sys.UTL_DBWS.release_service (service_handle => l_service);
EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
PKG_IRIS_SH.PRC_ins_spm('WEB','9999', 'Web Service', TO_DATE(p_dayend_date ,'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') ,'Error Description:' ||SQLERRM , '0');
End ;
Can any body advise on this issue.
thanks,
RamCross posted to APEX support forum, PLEASE CLOSE THIS THREAD..
Thank you,
Tony Miller
Webster, TX
Never Surrender Dreams!
JMS
If this question is answered, please mark the thread as closed and assign points where earned.. -
Issue when importing web service into CTI Aspect ECS server
Hi Experts,
We have an SOAP to ABAP Proxy interface in our production XI system.
this interface connects CTI ASPECT ECS system to SAP CRM system
(via XI or PI system).
CTI ASpect system consumes the web service exposed by XI system.
recently we edited the web service in XI system. when we try to import
the web service (WSDL file) into CTI ASPECT system , it generates an
XML parser error.
has any one anyone faced this issue earlier.please let me know how this issue can be resolved.
-KaushikHi Experts,
We have an SOAP to ABAP Proxy interface in our production XI system.
this interface connects CTI ASPECT ECS system to SAP CRM system
(via XI or PI system).
CTI ASpect system consumes the web service exposed by XI system.
recently we edited the web service in XI system. when we try to import
the web service (WSDL file) into CTI ASPECT system , it generates an
XML parser error.
has any one anyone faced this issue earlier.please let me know how this issue can be resolved.
-Kaushik -
CSDT issue when syncronizing to ContentServer Instance
Hi all,
We are trying to connect an Eclipse to a ContentServer instance deployed in WAS. When configuring the plugin qe don't get any error and we get the OK message "WebCentrSites is running". But if we try to syncronize or to acces the "Sites UI" or "Sites Loggin Configuration" views we get the following error message:
com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOException: DynamicInjector failed to access casInfo: java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://depcimucia:9080/servlet//Satellite?pagename=fatwire/wem/sso/casInfo
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.createBeanFactory(DynamicInjector.java:204)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.<init>(DynamicInjector.java:76)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.instance(DynamicInjector.java:248)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOSession.getSSOProvider(SSOSession.java:265)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOSession.getMultiTicket(SSOSession.java:155)
at com.fatwire.csdt.rest.RestProvider.getMultiTicket(RestProvider.java:67)
at com.fatwire.csdt.views.SiteEditorView.loadPage(SiteEditorView.java:50)
at com.fatwire.csdt.views.SiteEditorView.createPartControl(SiteEditorView.java:30)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ViewReference.createPartHelper(ViewReference.java:375)
at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ViewReference.createPart(ViewReference.java:229)
The issue seems to be in the url, in the double slash after servlet. We suppose it must be an incorrect property with an extra slash, but we cannot be sure about it.
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Thanks,
Mari MarHi, I am facing a similar problem when trying to use the csdt to import my sources to the dev server. I am not having the url issue but maybe some cas or missconfiguration issue.
I am running the latest version of WCS in a weblogic 10.3.6 on top of Solaris.
first of all in order to make the csdt work I also needed to add the csdt-client/lib/* to the classpath since I was getting classnotdeffoundexception for some wem/sso classes. when I sort that out then I get always this error no matter the command. I tried with these 2:
java com.fatwire.csdt.client.main.CSDT http://server:17711/cs/Contentserver username=fwadmin password=xceladmin resources=@ALL_ASSETS cmd=listds
java com.fatwire.csdt.client.main.CSDT http://server:17711/cs/Contentserver username=fwadmin password=xceladmin 'resources=@SITE:mySite_poc' cmd=import
always with the same output:
com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOException: DynamicInjector failed to access casInfo: java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://server:17711/cs/Contentserver/Satellite?pagename=fatwire/wem/sso/casInfo
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.createBeanFactory(DynamicInjector.java:206)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.<init>(DynamicInjector.java:76)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.DynamicInjector.instance(DynamicInjector.java:250)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOSession.getSSOProvider(SSOSession.java:265)
at com.fatwire.wem.sso.SSOSession.getTicket(SSOSession.java:137)
at com.fatwire.csdt.client.util.CSDTClientUtility.callCS(CSDTClientUtility.java:120)
at com.fatwire.csdt.client.main.CSDT.main(CSDT.java:31)
Any ideas?
thanks!
cheers,
juan -
Issue when deploying web service
Hi,
I'm new to web services. Im currently using netbeans 6.0 beta 1 to create my web services. After creating and deploying it on the bundled tomcat 6 server, i get this error that says that requested resource not found. What could be the cause of it as it works in netbeans 5.5? Could it be that the error is caused by the difference in the JAX WS 2.0 and 2.1 libraries?
note: netbeans 5.5 uses JAX WS 2.0. netbeans 6.0 beta 1 uses JAX WS 2.1.
much help would be appreciated. Thank you...
coderDuckhere's the log
Oct 29, 2007 11:15:59 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener
**************************************WARNING***************************************
To use JAX-WS 2.1 with JDK 6, newer versions of API jars need to be in bootclasspath
before rt.jar. To do this you can use Java endorsed mechanism to override what is in
Java platform. The easiest way to do so is to copy all jars from the
C:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.0 Beta 1\java1\modules\ext\jaxws21\api folder to
C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache Tomcat 6.0\endorsed.
com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletException: WSSERVLET11: failed to parse runtime descriptor: java.lang.LinkageError: JAXB 2.0 API is being loaded from the bootstrap classloader, but this RI (from jar:file:/D:/WSDpractical/testWS/build/web/WEB-INF/lib/jaxb-impl.jar!/com/sun/xml/bind/v2/model/impl/ModelBuilder.class) needs 2.1 API. Use the endorsed directory mechanism to place jaxb-api.jar in the bootstrap classloader. (See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener.contextInitialized(WSServletContextListener.java:118)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3827)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4334)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:791)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:771)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:525)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:626)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:511)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.check(HostConfig.java:1220)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.BaseModelMBean.invoke(BaseModelMBean.java:297)
at com.sun.jmx.interceptor.DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.invoke(DefaultMBeanServerInterceptor.java:836)
at com.sun.jmx.mbeanserver.JmxMBeanServer.invoke(JmxMBeanServer.java:761)
at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.check(ManagerServlet.java:1458)
at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.deploy(ManagerServlet.java:820)
at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.doGet(ManagerServlet.java:348)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:690)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.netbeans.modules.web.monitor.server.MonitorFilter.doFilter(MonitorFilter.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:230)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:525)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:104)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:261)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:844)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:581)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
**************************************WARNING***************************************
To use JAX-WS 2.1 with JDK 6, newer versions of API jars need to be in bootclasspath
before rt.jar. To do this you can use Java endorsed mechanism to override what is in
Java platform. The easiest way to do so is to copy all jars from the
C:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.0 Beta 1\java1\modules\ext\jaxws21\api folder to
C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache Tomcat 6.0\endorsed.
Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: JAXB 2.0 API is being loaded from the bootstrap classloader, but this RI (from jar:file:/D:/WSDpractical/testWS/build/web/WEB-INF/lib/jaxb-impl.jar!/com/sun/xml/bind/v2/model/impl/ModelBuilder.class) needs 2.1 API. Use the endorsed directory mechanism to place jaxb-api.jar in the bootstrap classloader. (See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.ModelBuilder.<clinit>(ModelBuilder.java:172)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.getTypeInfoSet(JAXBContextImpl.java:422)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.<init>(JAXBContextImpl.java:286)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.ContextFactory.createContext(ContextFactory.java:139)
at com.sun.xml.bind.api.JAXBRIContext.newInstance(JAXBRIContext.java:105)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl$1.run(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:146)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl$1.run(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:145)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl.createJAXBContext(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:144)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl.postProcess(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:83)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.RuntimeModeler.buildRuntimeModel(RuntimeModeler.java:260)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.EndpointFactory.createSEIModel(EndpointFactory.java:322)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.EndpointFactory.createEndpoint(EndpointFactory.java:188)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.server.WSEndpoint.create(WSEndpoint.java:467)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.DeploymentDescriptorParser.parseAdapters(DeploymentDescriptorParser.java:253)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.DeploymentDescriptorParser.parse(DeploymentDescriptorParser.java:147)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener.contextInitialized(WSServletContextListener.java:108)
... 36 more
Oct 29, 2007 11:15:59 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext listenerStart
SEVERE: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener
**************************************WARNING***************************************
To use JAX-WS 2.1 with JDK 6, newer versions of API jars need to be in bootclasspath
before rt.jar. To do this you can use Java endorsed mechanism to override what is in
Java platform. The easiest way to do so is to copy all jars from the
C:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.0 Beta 1\java1\modules\ext\jaxws21\api folder to
C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache Tomcat 6.0\endorsed.
com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletException: WSSERVLET11: failed to parse runtime descriptor: java.lang.LinkageError: JAXB 2.0 API is being loaded from the bootstrap classloader, but this RI (from jar:file:/D:/WSDpractical/testWS/build/web/WEB-INF/lib/jaxb-impl.jar!/com/sun/xml/bind/v2/model/impl/ModelBuilder.class) needs 2.1 API. Use the endorsed directory mechanism to place jaxb-api.jar in the bootstrap classloader. (See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener.contextInitialized(WSServletContextListener.java:118)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.listenerStart(StandardContext.java:3827)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4334)
at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.start(ManagerServlet.java:1237)
at org.apache.catalina.manager.ManagerServlet.doGet(ManagerServlet.java:373)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:690)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.netbeans.modules.web.monitor.server.MonitorFilter.doFilter(MonitorFilter.java:174)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:230)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)
at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:525)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:104)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:261)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:844)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:581)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
**************************************WARNING***************************************
To use JAX-WS 2.1 with JDK 6, newer versions of API jars need to be in bootclasspath
before rt.jar. To do this you can use Java endorsed mechanism to override what is in
Java platform. The easiest way to do so is to copy all jars from the
C:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.0 Beta 1\java1\modules\ext\jaxws21\api folder to
C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation\Apache Tomcat 6.0\endorsed.
Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: JAXB 2.0 API is being loaded from the bootstrap classloader, but this RI (from jar:file:/D:/WSDpractical/testWS/build/web/WEB-INF/lib/jaxb-impl.jar!/com/sun/xml/bind/v2/model/impl/ModelBuilder.class) needs 2.1 API. Use the endorsed directory mechanism to place jaxb-api.jar in the bootstrap classloader. (See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.ModelBuilder.<clinit>(ModelBuilder.java:172)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.getTypeInfoSet(JAXBContextImpl.java:422)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.runtime.JAXBContextImpl.<init>(JAXBContextImpl.java:286)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.ContextFactory.createContext(ContextFactory.java:139)
at com.sun.xml.bind.api.JAXBRIContext.newInstance(JAXBRIContext.java:105)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl$1.run(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:146)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl$1.run(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:145)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl.createJAXBContext(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:144)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.AbstractSEIModelImpl.postProcess(AbstractSEIModelImpl.java:83)
at com.sun.xml.ws.model.RuntimeModeler.buildRuntimeModel(RuntimeModeler.java:260)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.EndpointFactory.createSEIModel(EndpointFactory.java:322)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.EndpointFactory.createEndpoint(EndpointFactory.java:188)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.server.WSEndpoint.create(WSEndpoint.java:467)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.DeploymentDescriptorParser.parseAdapters(DeploymentDescriptorParser.java:253)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.DeploymentDescriptorParser.parse(DeploymentDescriptorParser.java:147)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.WSServletContextListener.contextInitialized(WSServletContextListener.java:108)
... 22 more -
Applying Service Pack on multiple instance SQL Server 2008 R2 Cluster and Standalone.
Friends,
Its my first time I am applying Service pack to both Standalone and Clustered SQL 2008 R2 servers. I have multiple instances running on both stand alone and Clustered environment. I don't know how to apply pack with multiple instances. Do I need to apply
the service pack each instance one by one or I can just run the pack to each node of cluster and each box of stand alone server? Will I get any multi instance selection option during the installation process so that I can select multiple instances at once??When installing service pack for multiple instances in a standalone machine, you just run the installer and it lists all the instances eligible for the update. You could do it one by one or do it at the same time. Doing it at the same time saves time and
energy. If you selected multiple instances then you dont have to do anything else.
In case of cluster, if you have multiple instances then you need to be little careful.
Eg: Assume you have a 2 node cluster Node 1 and Node 2. Two instances Instance 1 active on Node 1 and Instance 2 active on Node 2. What I would do in this case is to first failover any one instance to the passive node. Assume I failed over Instance 2 to
Node 1. Now Node 1 is active node for both instance 1 and instance 2 and Node 2 is passive for both instances. At this point I run the service pack on Node 2. Once patching is done, I reboot the node and then failover the instaces one by one to Node
2. At this point both instances 1 and 2 would get upgraded and will be active in Node2. Now Node 1 is passive and so run the update there. Once the service pack is installed, reboot and then fail back Instance 1 back to Node 1. Note: I would also failover
Instance 2 to Node 1 just to confirm that failover works completely after service pack update.
Regards, Ashwin Menon My Blog - http:\\sqllearnings.com -
Good morning,
I'm experiencing the following issue when installing Microsoft SQL Server Express 2012 (with tools, SQLEXPRWT_x86_ENU.exe) on the laptop of my company;
Installation goes plain until around the end of the progress bar, it stops on the setup of
SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc_Cpu32
giving 7-8 times, even pressing "Cancel", the message "The requested control is not valid for this service";
After this, I receive one last message ""Could not find the database engine startup handle", then installation ends with failures, in particular the Database Engine and the Server Replication failed to be installed.
I've put in my SkyDrive the error log I received after the install;
I'm at full disposal if you need further information,
thank you in advance
Best regards
FrancescoWell, i just ran into this issue and the problem was lack of admin rights. It was my company's laptop so got the setup initiated by my company's IT team with admin rights. However, the upon completion of setup, i go the same error messages as stated above:
SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc_Cpu32
giving 7-8 times, even pressing "Cancel", the message "The requested control is not valid for this service";
After this, I receive one last message ""Could not find the database engine startup handle", then installation ends with failures, in particular the Database Engine and the Server Replication failed to be installed.
Also, if you open SQL Server Configuration, the status of the service is "Change Pending" and you would not be able to set the startup login type to Local Service/System/Network.
Then, I just got my account added as Local Admin and then tried to start the service and was able to.
However, I am not sure whether same was the case for you.
Please mark the answer as helpful if i have answered your query. Thanks and Regards, Kartar Rana -
SP 2010 - Error when creating a new Search Service Instance
Hi experts,
I'm getting the below error logged in my SharePoint 2010 SP2 Server. Any ideas to resolve it please? Thanks in advance.
Application Server Administration job failed for service instance Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance (9b011033-0dc6-4d77-8f22-c16aa010532f). Reason: Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040D23
Technical Support Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80040D23): Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040D23
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.MSSITLB.IGatherManagerAdmin3.get_ConfigurationVersion()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.Gatherer.ProvisionGlobalProperties()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Administration.SearchServiceInstance.Synchronize()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.ApplicationServerJob.ProvisionLocalSharedServiceInstances(Boolean isAdministrationServiceJob)
Hamza Grandidid you see any error in Event/application logs? could you please tell us at what point you getting the error?
mostly this is happen when An index corrupted, may need to rebuild / reset the index.
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog -
Can I apply any application patch when all application services are down?
Hello All,
Can I apply any application patch when all application services are down?
Reg
Chirag PatelDefinitely you can. On some operating system (like Windows), if relinking is part of the patch then you cannot apply patches unless Application services are down.
Whenever we apply a patch, we enable maintenance mode through adadmin, this would stop users from accessing the application during patch installation. However, you still can use "adpatch options=hotpatch" to apply a patch without enabling maintenance mode. -
hi, I finally got lucky and past the "other" memory status issues when syncing. Now I'm "waiting for changes to be applied" sync stuck all night (itunes yesomite iPhone 6 plus). is this a bug? I have not had a single successful sync with yesomite.
please help. this issue prevents music from syncing. I have set the sync setting to convert songs to 192kbps AAC to save space, I figure that could slow the sync
down, but it's hanging indefinitely (I've left it for 24 hours with out it completing.)
the the only music that appears on the phone are songs purchased from the iTunes Store. 95% of my collection are rips from my CDs.
thank you for any help!Yeah it's pretty sad that $1000 phone they put out you such cheap memory It causes issues, I have iPhone 6+128 GB actually this is the second brand-new one they gave me because they keep affording it trying to act like that's not the issue because they're too stupid to know how to check what memory is in each one before they give it to me when I have told them multiple times my back up runs perfectly fine on two 5s phones and a 6 64GB of course running MLC memory.
I told them it's because just like the write ups say I have 809 apps but I have not even put all my music on the phone so I'm still running 50 to 60 gigs free and it crashes and reboots itself sometimes in multitasking and more often than it does that in between multitasking I get a black screen for 1 to 2 seconds in between apps and upon start up the Apple logo screen will flicker and do weird things, One of the genius idiots asked me if I could just delete some of my apps, really that's the answer to fix the phone the customer needs to limit the amount to apps they put on their phone, why the **** get a 128 gig if you can't put on anything you want to it guess they need to start selling them saying you can only put a limited number of apps on them, it's really is a **** joke, I have over $20,000 of Apple merchandise easily and always get the new phone every year but I'm starting to reconsider my decisions in the future because this company is starting to go downhill, The reason water not recalling the phones is because they're dealing with their top-of-the-line thousand dollar phones in this case and most people don't have over two or 300 apps so they're not having as many issues, so basically they have messed up phones they just don't know it in their hands and Apple is just too **** greedy to recall the phones, they'd rather sell customer spends that only work half ***.
Stuff like this will be the downfall of their company, all the people that stay with them because as long as you don't jailbreak their stuff it normally just works without issue will be soon jumping ship if stuff like this keeps up, because I can guarantee they got me thinking now.
not that I wanted to know or should I be expected to but I even offered for them to open up my brand-new phone and just replace the memory to MLC memory which is something I shouldn't have to do with a brand-new **** phone, they should just make one with the right memory and give me a new phone, actually just don't sell customers that buy the top-of-the-line phone from you trash ones in the first place that would be a great option.
what burns me up the most is when you talk to AppleCare and Genius Bar they try to act like the issue isn't there and they're unaware of it, they say that Apple hasn't come out with any information about it, yeah that's because they don't want to recall the trash.
Apple has became nothing better than your run-of-the-mill company, android is becoming just as good as they are sad to say this since I have been an Apple fan for so long but there is no excuse for BS like this they have been looking for options to fix my phone for a month now this is not the way you should treat loyal customers, I would've been better off keeping my 5S and in the future just switching to android.
it's pretty sad that the company has no idea how to check which memory is in their **** phone and even after I offered to let them just replace the memory in my new phone by opening up my brand-new phone to replace it they have no idea how to do that either, yeah Genius Bar sure, I think that should change the name to idiot bar and Apple don't care instead of Apple care. -
Service Instance remains active when calling Web Service using WCF-BasicHttp binding
I am trying to call a web service using ESB ToolKit using a dynamic send port. The message went through all the pipeline components successfully. However, after the message is picked up by the WCF adapter, the service instance remains in "Active"
status, and then eventually it dehydrates itself. There's no error in the event log at all. Have anyone seen this problem before? If so, what is the solution?
I tried using a static send port with exactly the same configuration and the message reaches the web service successfully and got the response back.
Please note the web service is RPC-Style web service, not sure if it makes a difference.
Here is the configuration for the static send port
<Address>http://myserver:8088/mockLoadDataBinding</Address><TransportType Name="WCF-BasicHttp" Capabilities="899" ConfigurationClsid="467c1a52-373f-4f09-9008-27af6b985f14" />
<TransportTypeData>
<CustomProps>
<InboundNodeEncoding vt="8">String</InboundNodeEncoding>
<MessageEncoding vt="8">Text</MessageEncoding>
<ServiceCertificate vt="8" />
<InboundBodyPathExpression vt="8">//*[local-name()='return']/node() | //*[local-name()='SecurityException']</InboundBodyPathExpression>
<OutboundBodyLocation vt="8">UseTemplate</OutboundBodyLocation>
<StaticAction vt="8" />
<InboundBodyLocation vt="8">UseBodyPath</InboundBodyLocation>
<ProxyAddress vt="8" />
<MaxReceivedMessageSize vt="3">65536</MaxReceivedMessageSize>
<ClientCertificate vt="8" />
<AlgorithmSuite vt="8">Basic256</AlgorithmSuite>
<ProxyUserName vt="8" />
<OutboundXmlTemplate vt="8"><web:loadData soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:web="http://www.company.com/webservices" xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><input xsi:type="xsd:string"><bts-msg-body xmlns="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/bts2007" encoding="string"/></input></web:loadData></OutboundXmlTemplate>
<TextEncoding vt="8">utf-8</TextEncoding>
<PropagateFaultMessage vt="11">-1</PropagateFaultMessage>
<SecurityMode vt="8">None</SecurityMode>
<ProxyToUse vt="8">Default</ProxyToUse>
<TransportClientCredentialType vt="8">None</TransportClientCredentialType>
<OpenTimeout vt="8">00:01:00</OpenTimeout>
<UseAcsAuthentication vt="11">0</UseAcsAuthentication>
<MessageClientCredentialType vt="8">UserName</MessageClientCredentialType>
<UseSSO vt="11">0</UseSSO>
<CloseTimeout vt="8">00:01:00</CloseTimeout>
<SendTimeout vt="8">00:01:00</SendTimeout>
</CustomProps>
</TransportTypeData>
here is the configuration for the dynamic send port (using BRE Resolver)
Set Endpoint Outbound TransportType to WCF-BasicHttp
Set Endpoint Outbound TransportLocation to http://myserver:8088/mockLoadDataBinding
Set Endpoint Message Exchange Pattern to Solicit-Response
Set EndPoint WCF Action to <empty string>
Set Endpoint Config to InboundNodeEncoding=String&MessageEncoding=Text&InboundBodyPathExpression=//*[local-name()='return']/node() | //*[local-name()='SecurityException']&OutboundBodyLocation=UseTemplate&StaticAction=&InboundBodyLocation=UseBodyPath&MaxReceivedMessageSize=65536&AlgorithmSuite=Basic256&OutboundXmlTemplate=<web:loadData
soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:web="http://www.company.com/webservices" xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><input xsi:type="xsd:string"><bts-msg-body xmlns="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/bts2007"
encoding="string"/></input></web:loadData>&TextEncoding=utf-8&PropagateFaultMessage vt="11">-1&SecurityMode=None&ProxyToUse=Default&TransportClientCredentialType=None&OpenTimeout=00:01:00&UseAcsAuthentication=False&MessageClientCredentialType=UserName&UseSSO=False&CloseTimeout=00:01:00&SendTimeout=00:01:00
Set Endpoint Target Namespace to
http://www.company.com/webservicesThanks Birdsven,
I updated the Resolver policy to as follows, and still I am getting the same result.
<then>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="4ad331d0-820c-41cb-a98e-7e1f5a9d5360" />
<classmember member="set_TransportType" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>WCF-BasicHttp</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="20652bdd-c1f2-4b75-9e6b-7e20af98e66d" />
<classmember member="set_MessageExchangePattern" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>Solicit-Response</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="9357b8ea-3663-4625-9681-a2fc2f423911" />
<classmember member="set_TransportLocation" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>http://myservice.com:8089/loadDataService</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="9c97e7a0-d119-4b0d-8e39-2b281ae6ef8d" />
<classmember member="set_Action" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>{loadData}</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="2829f1b7-09c0-4396-b82e-23fd65d8439c" />
<classmember member="set_EndpointConfig" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>InboundNodeEncoding=String&MessageEncoding=Text&ServiceCertificate=&InboundBodyPathExpression=//*[local-name()='return']/node() | //*[local-name()='SecurityException']&OutboundBodyLocation=UseTemplate&StaticAction=&InboundBodyLocation=UseBodyPath&ProxyAddress=&MaxReceivedMessageSize=65536&ClientCertificate=&AlgorithmSuite=Basic256&ProxyUserName=&OutboundXmlTemplate=<web:loadData soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:web="http://www.mycompany.com/webservices" xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><input xsi:type="xsd:string"><bts-msg-body xmlns="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/bts2007" encoding="string"/></input></web:loadData>&TextEncoding=utf-8&PropagateFaultMessage=True&SecurityMode=None&ProxyToUse=Default&TransportClientCredentialType=None&OpenTimeout=00:01:00&UseAcsAuthentication=False&MessageClientCredentialType=UserName&UseSSO=False&CloseTimeout=00:01:00&SendTimeout=00:01:00</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
<function>
<vocabularylink uri="95dced57-5e9b-4dbe-9cd8-4b166853dd8a" element="54624479-caea-4228-86b9-fbe188a8c64d" />
<classmember member="set_TargetNamespace" sideeffects="true">
<classref ref="Resolution" />
<argument>
<constant>
<string>http://www.mycompany.com/webservices</string>
</constant>
</argument>
</classmember>
</function>
</then> -
H.323 secondary gateway issue when E1 service fails
Hi,
We've had a problem today with one of our remote sites. The E1 service failed and the users were unable to receive inbound external calls (as expected) or to make outbound external call (not expected).
The Call Manager 4.0 cluster has two H.323 gateways for external calls for each remote site (the primary is routed via the remote site E1 service and the secondary via the CCM site).
The site has been configured so that if all ISDN ports are busy new external calls overflow to the secondary gateway. This has been tested and works fine. SRST has also been configured on the router and tests OK.
The problem that happened today appears to be that when the E1 service failed the calls were still being routed to the primary H.323 gateway and not being sent to the secondary gateway. This was becaus the loopback address that binds the gateway address was still up up.
Is there any way to configure the router or the call manager so that the above situation does not happen and that if the E1 service fails new calls are routed to the secondary gateway.
Some configs below.
Loopback config for H.323 gateway
interface Loopback0
description Loopback Address
ip address 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.255
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.x.x.x
sh ip int br
Serial0/0/0:15 unassigned YES NVRAM down down (E1 service down)
Loopback0 10.x.x.x YES NVRAM up up (Loopback interface up)
Route/Hunt list Configuration (in order of priority)
Remote_RG[non-QSIG] (Remote site)
Local_RG[non-QSIG] (CCM site)
Note: When the route list priorities were changed manually the remote site could make external outbound calls via the secondary gateway.
Thanks in advance for help provided.
Regards,
Bryce.In some situations, publisher and subscriber are used as the secondary and primary servers respectively. In this case the lower preference should be given to the subscriber because it is the Cisco CallManager server designated for call handling, while the publisher is designated to handle both the SQL database and the LDAP directory. If there is any problem with the subscriber, the call should be routed to the publisher, which can also route calls.
-
Hi All,
I cant get to stop SharePoint foundation web app service. Its stuck on status stopping
I have tried the following:
reset IIS
restarted the Timer Service
When I try to use powershell command to stop I get the following error:
Can anyone who went through this help PLEASE
Stop-SPServiceInstance : An object of the type
Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPServiceInstanceJobDefinition named
"job-service-instance-1ff39eb2-12d2-457d-a749-265e350eb1b1" already exists
under the parent Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTimerService named
"SPTimerV4". Rename your object or delete the existing object.
At line:1 char:127
+ ... pplication"} | Stop-SPServiceInstance
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Share...ServiceInstance:
SPCmdletStopServiceInstance) [Stop-SPServiceInstance], SPDuplicateObjectEx
ception
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.SharePoint.PowerShell.SPCmdletStopServ
iceInstanceHi,
It seems that the issue is in the timer job definition for executing this operation.
My suggestion is to start the service again and delete the job definition from the error and again try to stop it.
This might be helpful:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/22368/is-there-a-powershell-cmdlet-to-delete-a-timer-job
I had a lot of issues in the past when try to stop this instance after the Web apps are provisioned.
As general rule now If I have multi-server Farm topology that has servers that should not serve Web App requests I turn off the service prior to provisioning any Web Apps in the Farm.
BR,
Ivan -
Router Dead , when i applied QOS on virtual-temp interface for vpn !!
hi all ,
i have a simple brief topology below :
PSTN======(R1-7206)>F1=======F2>(R2-7604 catalyst)>>>F1=========Internet
i have two router
R2========>MLS 7604
R1======>cisco 7204
on R2 , Im doing matching to QOS by dscp , im matching acls ips from internet with dscp values :
here is CONFIG for matching :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map LLQX
Policy Map LLQX
Class YOUTUBE
set ip dscp af43
Class FACEBOOKVIDEOS
set ip dscp af33
Class HTTP
set dscp af23
Class DNSQOS
set dscp af13
Class class-default
set ip dscp af11
================
Gateway7600#sh class-map
Class Map match-all FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 7)
Match access-group name facebookvideos
Class Map match-all DNSQOS (id 8)
Match access-group name dnsqos
Class Map match-all HTTP (id 6)
Match access-group name browsing
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
Match any
Class Map match-all YOUTUBE (id 5)
Match access-group name youtube
Gateway7600#
=========================================================
on this router i applied this policy map on interfaxce F1 in direction
and here matching is well :
Gateway7600#sh policy-map interface gigabitEthernet 1/5 in
GigabitEthernet1/5
Service-policy input: LLQX
class-map: rate-limit (match-all)
Match: access-group name rate-limit
police :
4088000 bps 384000 limit 384000 extended limit
Earl in slot 1 :
139044930 bytes
30 second offered rate 143032 bps
aggregate-forwarded 134420937 bytes action: transmit
exceeded 4623993 bytes action: drop
aggregate-forward 22544 bps exceed 0 bps
class-map: YOUTUBE (match-all)
Match: access-group name youtube
set dscp 38:
Earl in slot 1 :
132693939697 bytes
30 second offered rate 212144928 bps
aggregate-forwarded 132693939697 bytes
class-map: FACEBOOKVIDEOS (match-all)
Match: access-group name facebookvideos
set dscp 30:
Earl in slot 1 :
10726758352 bytes
30 second offered rate 20682720 bps
aggregate-forwarded 10726758352 bytes
class-map: HTTP (match-all)
Match: access-group name browsing
set dscp 22:
Earl in slot 1 :
56874058537 bytes
30 second offered rate 92669832 bps
aggregate-forwarded 56874058537 bytes
class-map: DNSQOS (match-all)
Match: access-group name dnsqos
set dscp 14:
Earl in slot 1 :
160308954 bytes
30 second offered rate 303552 bps
aggregate-forwarded 160308954 bytes
class-map: class-default (match-any)
Match: any
set dscp 10:
Earl in slot 1 :
67394864030 bytes
30 second offered rate 126884864 bps
aggregate-forwarded 67394864030 bytes
=================================================================================
now the problem is below
on router 7200 , it is LNS router connected with LAC roiuter for ADSL customers.
now here is config of policy map on 7200 router:
R11#sh policy-map
Policy Map MATCH_MARKS
Class MATCH_YOUTUBE
bandwidth 220000 (kbps)
Class MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS
bandwidth 20000 (kbps)
Class MATCH_HTTP
bandwidth 100000 (kbps)
=========================================================
R1#sh class-map
Class Map match-all MATCH_FACEBOOKVIDEOS (id 2)
Match ip dscp af33 (30)
Class Map match-all MATCH_HTTP (id 3)
Match ip dscp af23 (22)
Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
Match any
Class Map match-all MATCH_YOUTUBE (id 1)
Match ip dscp af43 (38)
==========================================================
here is virtual-template interface before i apply the QOS
R1#sh running-config interface virtual-template 1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 352 bytes
interface Virtual-Template1
bandwidth 1000000
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1412
ip policy route-map private
no logging event link-status
qos pre-classify
peer default ip address pool bitsead1 bitsead2
ppp mtu adaptive
ppp authentication pap vpdn
ppp authorization vpdn
ppp accounting vpdn
max-reserved-bandwidth 90
end
=========================================
when i apply the command
(service-poliy output MATCH_MAKRS ) under virtual-template interface i have console logs :
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
Insufficient bandwidth 149760 kbps for the bandwidth guarantee (220000)
also i have
*Jul 9 22:28:38.242: Interface Virtual-Access2551 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.250: Interface Virtual-Access627 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.258: Interface Virtual-Access786 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.266: Interface Virtual-Access623 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.274: Interface Virtual-Access2559 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.282: Interface Virtual-Access2281 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:38.290: Interface Virtual-Access142 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACCD0z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
*Jul 9 22:28:40.262: %SYS-2-INTSCHED: 'suspend' at level 3 -Process= "VTEMPLATE Background Mgr", ipl= 3, pid= 278, -Traceback= 0x756FF0z 0x3439C58z 0x2778D70z 0x2CACD28z 0x2CC63E0z 0x2CC7FF8z 0x2CADC74z 0x2CBE058z 0x2CA0340z 0x2CA04F8z 0x2E0BB18z 0x2D23378z 0x2D1825Cz 0x2D18738z 0x2E66FE0z 0x2D971ACz
after i apply it ,
the cpu is 100 % and the router got down !!!
now
what is the problem ????
here is ios for 7200 router
R1#sh version
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200P-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(24)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2012 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 28-Feb-12 12:53 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(12.2r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Bras1 uptime is 13 weeks, 1 day, 9 hours, 24 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 16:24:51 GMT+3 Tue Jun 17 2003
System image file is "disk2:c7200p-adventerprisek9-mz.124-24.T7.bin"
Last reload reason: Reload Command
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G2) processor (revision A) with 917504K/65536K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID 36858624
MPC7448 CPU at 1666Mhz, Implementation 0, Rev 2.2
6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.11
Last reset from power-on
PCI bus mb1 (Slots 1, 3 and 5) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb1 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
PCI bus mb2 (Slots 2, 4 and 6) has a capacity of 600 bandwidth points.
Current configuration on bus mb2 has a total of 0 bandwidth points.
This configuration is within the PCI bus capacity and is supported.
Please refer to the following document "Cisco 7200 Series Port Adaptor
Hardware Configuration Guidelines" on Cisco.com <http://www.cisco.com>
for c7200 bandwidth points oversubscription and usage guidelines.
1 FastEthernet interface
3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2045K bytes of NVRAM.
250880K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 2 (Sector size 512 bytes).
65536K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 512K).
Configuration register is 0x2102
==============================================================================
wish to Help ASAP
regardshi ,
i did
the same issue ,
i did a TEST policymap that has 30 percent gurantee
but the same result!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the router god down agian !
here is logs :
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.605: Interface Virtual-Access1896 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.797: Interface Virtual-Access1317 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.809: Interface Virtual-Access993 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.817: Interface Virtual-Access1699 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.981: Interface Virtual-Access254 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:33.993: Interface Virtual-Access687 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.001: Interface Virtual-Access35 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.009: Interface Virtual-Access160 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.017: Interface Virtual-Access1337 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.029: Interface Virtual-Access1670 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.037: Interface Virtual-Access1948 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.049: Interface Virtual-Access1669 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.109: Interface Virtual-Access1334 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.117: Interface Virtual-Access151 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.125: Interface Virtual-Access761 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.137: Interface Virtual-Access810 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.197: Interface Virtual-Access1522 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.237: Interface Virtual-Access1692 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.257: Interface Virtual-Access368 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.305: Interface Virtual-Access1758 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.317: Interface Virtual-Access2061 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.325: Interface Virtual-Access1203 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.337: Interface Virtual-Access188 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.345: Interface Virtual-Access1975 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.357: Interface Virtual-Access1172 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.509: Interface Virtual-Access1647 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.517: Interface Virtual-Access458 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.609: Interface Virtual-Access608 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.621: Interface Virtual-Access2128 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.633: Interface Virtual-Access1167 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.641: Interface Virtual-Access487 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.653: Interface Virtual-Access1793 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.665: Interface Virtual-Access2280 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.769: Interface Virtual-Access839 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.781: Interface Virtual-Access2311 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.793: Interface Virtual-Access1788 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.857: Interface Virtual-Access8 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.869: Interface Virtual-Access2243 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:34.881: Interface Virtual-Access580 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.057: Interface Virtual-Access6 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.065: Interface Virtual-Access1331 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.077: Interface Virtual-Access1235 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.177: Interface Virtual-Access1748 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.189: Interface Virtual-Access2262 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
*Jul 11 02:40:35.205: Interface Virtual-Access2136 max_reserved_bandwidth config will not
take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
i want to ask a question , could this be from IOS ???? -
ME3600 does not forward frames out one interface in service instance
Hi,
I have an issue with ME3600 running 15.3(1)S. I have a BDI used for CPE
management.
cisco ME-3600X-24FS-M
Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version
15.3(1)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
This is the BDI and VRF configuration:
interface Vlan1620
ip vrf forwarding 65000:1620
ip address 10.232.28.1 255.255.252.0
no ip redirects
ip vrf 65000:1620
rd 65000:1620
route-target export 65000:1620
route-target import 65000:1620
address-family ipv4 vrf 65000:1620
redistribute connected
The MPLS part is working fine, no issues there. There is also a DHCP
pool handing out IPs to the CPEs.
ip dhcp pool 65000:1620
vrf 65000:1620
network 10.232.28.0 255.255.252.0
domain-name xyz
default-router 10.232.28.1
option 66 ascii 10.232.28.1
dns-server 8.8.8.8
lease 0 0 30
This also works fine and I have verified that CPE has both IP and GW.
Then for the service instance configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
service instance 1620 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 1620
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 1620
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
switchport trunk allowed vlan none
switchport mode trunk
service instance 1620 ethernet
encapsulation dot1q 1620
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
bridge-domain 1620
Traffic to CPEs behind Gi0/11 works:
sh ip arp vrf 65000:1620 vlan 1620 | i 29.26
Internet 10.232.29.26 0 0022.07f3.3450 ARPA Vlan1620
show mac-address-table address 0022.07f3.3450
Mac Address Table
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
1620 0022.07f3.3450 DYNAMIC Gi0/11+Efp1620
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 1
Pinging 10.232.29.26 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.232.29.26: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=61
Reply from 10.232.29.26: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=61
Reply from 10.232.29.26: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=61
Reply from 10.232.29.26: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=61
Traffic to CPEs behind Gi0/5 does not work.
sh ip arp vrf 65000:1620 vlan 1620 | i 28.190
Internet 10.232.28.190 2 0022.07f2.76a6 ARPA Vlan1620
show mac-address-table address 0022.07f2.76a6
Mac Address Table
Vlan Mac Address Type Ports
1620 0022.07f2.76a6 DYNAMIC Gi0/5+Efp1620
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 1
Pinging 10.232.28.190 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
This is also confirmed by looking at counters. There seems to be no
egress traffic on Gi0/5.
Service Instance 1620, Interface GigabitEthernet0/11
Pkts In Bytes In Pkts Out Bytes Out
31717 2955368 4569808 1709207624
Service Instance 1620, Interface GigabitEthernet0/5
Pkts In Bytes In Pkts Out Bytes Out
4850878 367975447 0 0
It does work to ping locally from the 3600 though:
ping vrf 65000:1620 10.232.28.190
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.232.28.190, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
I'm not sure how to troubleshoot it further. I've also tried setting up
ERSPAN sessions for RX traffic on Gi0/5 but I don't get anything in
unless I ping 28.1 which is the IP of the interface on the 3600.
Any clues?
Daniel Dib
CCIE #37149
Please rate helpful posts.It could not have been caused by a virus, since there are no viruses for Mac OS X. I would guess it was a typo when you first setup the account, and when you set it up again, a user may have gone to Preferences and selected the Outgoing mail server drop down menu and inadvertently selected the typo'd server entry.
Mulder
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can I buy final cut pro x , using my mac and then install it in other State using another Mac?
-
Not sure if I'm repeating myself here, but here is a repeat: HI, my friend has updated her iPad to iOS8 and has since lost sight of anything she types, ie, email, chat in games, etc. can anyone help, please?
-
How to use log4j in an EJB Module??
I have included the log4j.jar in libraries; added log4j.xml in the sources folder; but I m getting an error: <Apr 22, 2014 11:07:50 AM PKT> <Warning> <EJB> <BEA-010065> <MessageDrivenBean threw an Exception in onMessage(). The exception is: java.lang
-
Hardware requirement for SAP E-Sourcing 5.0
Hi, Can any one tell me please about hardware requirement for SAP E-Sourcing 5.0. Thanks Sanjay Rai
-
I had a single domain controller. It has crashed. I had to create a new domain controller with all the same existing information from the old server..same domain name, server name, and IP. Im having issues with desktops. Everything is setup on the se