EtherChannel load-balance on Catalyst 6500 running CatOS

I know EtherChannel load balancing can use either MAC addresses, IP addresses, or the TCP port numbers.
1 Can I config it to make sure every port under the same Channel group has the same traffic utilization?
2 If one of the Etherchannel physical port has traffic more than its physical bandwidth, why switch can't use another Etherchannel physical port to share the traffic?

Normally it will fairly well balance the traffic . There is no way to make sure each channel is exactly the same utilization wise . You can look at how it is load balanced and make a change from say mac to ip address if it looks like you aren't getting the balance you want . It would be very rare that you are going to fill one port on the channel without filling the rest almost the same .Exceptions would be if you most of your traffic is headed to one place like a certain server , even then if you used ip addresses in both directions as the load balance I think it would balance out pretty good. If it got to that point where one link was almost filled you would have to think about adding another port to the channel . This is a real good page http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml

Similar Messages

  • Etherchannel Load-Balance

    Hi All,
    I have one Catalyst 6509 connected to Catalyst 4500X-VSS using a Layer 2 Etherchannel.
    So, 6509 are using src-dst-ip for Etherchannel Load Balance and 4500X are using src-dst-port.
    Anyone knows if this will work fine or if I may have some problem?
    Is recommended change that configuration or not?
    Tks.

    I agree with Karsten, That there would be any problem.
    As you know Etherchannel is kind of load sharing among the links...It has its own way of load sharing/balancing the traffic if you leave it to default. (which means you might end up using the same link most often times if you dont change the default load balancing method). Hence we see people change the default method to the one which they want and get the nearest load sharing/balancing over the links utilization.
    HTH
    REgards
    Inayath

  • Etherchannel Load-Balancing To Host (Confused)

    I'm a bit confused as to how an etherchannel load-balances traffic across all the links, in the port-channel.  If I have a 4 port etherchannel, to an AIX host, does the traffic load balance across all 4 ports?   In reading the load-balancing documentation, it states that a global configuration of src-mac forwards traffic from the same host, over the same port, all the time, whereas it forwards traffic over different ports for other hosts.  What if it's the same host tied into the port-channel?  So if my AIX box has 4 ethernet cards in a port channel, each ethernet card goes over only one link?  If the ethernet cards are bundled, into a port channel config, is there no way to load balance all the traffic?  Maybe I'm misunderstanding the etherchannel configuration and how it works.  Thanks for any and all help!!
    Dan

      Port channel is link aggregation for all traffic which will get distributed across all links.  A given ip conversation will only travel down one of those links at any given time. The single ip conversation is not carried say for instance across all 4 links if it's a 4 port etherchannel.

  • Etherchannel load balancing options

    Reading up on my Etherchannel load balancing options (src or dst, mac or IP) it seems to me that I don't have a good way of using Etherchannel to increase bandwidth in my situation. In my scenario, I have a Windows terminal server servicing a couple hundred users which are using a SQL database on a 2nd server. Both servers are on the same switch. Basically I only have one MAC and one IP. Is there a way to utilize multiple links in this scenario? It seems like I would need a packet based technique to take advantage of multiple channels and unfortunately that isn't an option with etherchannel. Thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Diego

    Hi Diego,
    If I understand you correctly, your scenario is similar to this
    200users--Switch===channel===Switch--Server1+2
    If that's how it is set up, then you have multiple source addresses with the same destination address. So if you select either 'source' or 'source and destination' as your frame distribution method, then you should have a pretty even distribution of traffic.
    HTH,
    Bobby
    *Please rate helpful posts.

  • Etherchannel Load balancing

    I have three Gigabit aggregated with LACP to a IBM server. When I ask one ftp from this server I saw the performance is around 80 MB/s, if I ask two ftp to different equipmpents the performance is 160 MB/s (it uses 2 of the links of the bundle). However if I ask for three ftp the performance keeps in 160 MB/s although it uses the three links of the bundle. Is there a limit for Cisco? Anyone knows the reason? It seems like we can transmit as maximum at 160 MB/s

    Glen is absolutely correct. on layer 2 switches EtherChannel load balancing can use either source-MAC or destination-MAC address forwarding.
    With source-MAC address forwarding, when packets are forwarded to an EtherChannel, the packets are distributed across the ports in the channel based on the source-MAC address of the incoming packet. Therefore, to provide load balancing, packets from different hosts use different ports in the channel, but packets from the same host use the same port in the channel. With destination-MAC address forwarding, when packets are forwarded to an EtherChannel, the packets are distributed across the ports in the channel based on the destination host MAC address of the incoming packet. Therefore, packets to the same destination are forwarded over the same port, and packets to a different destination are sent on a different port in the channel.
    So with every different source or destination mac it will use a diff link. If there is a session started on a aprticular link for a source to a destination it will keep on using the same link until the session termiantes or link goes down.
    HTH, Please rate if it helps.
    -amit singh

  • IPS etherchannel load balancing design

    Is it possible to do a etherchannel load balancing with the design attached? i know I need to configure vlan pairs but I'm not sure if it's possible with my current design

    Etherchannel design will work with interface pair as well ,provided the design is appropriate to take care of the asymmetry.
    Coming to your design, if i understand the requirement correctly, you wish to create etherchannel between 3750 stacked switch and the pair of CAT6K. Enabling VSS on the pair of CAT6K switches and then creating etherchannel should help.But the flow symmetry will not be guaranteed ( meaning the same IPS may not see the forward and the reverse packets of the flow).

  • Help choose the appropriate etherchannel load balance method

    Hi
    I have 2 network architectures :case A and case B  (found architecture below)
    Case A : one server connected on the switch on each site
    Case B : 3 server connected on the switch behind a router on each site
    2 site are connected by 2 wireless link :each wireless link have 105 Mbps bandwith (I absolutly need the agregate bandwith 210)
    Site headquarter is the principal site and site backup is use to backup data located on the principal site
    I use Gbit cisco  2960 switch
    I use etherchannel to agregate the 2 switch port (port 1 and port 2) where the 2 wireless link are connected
    I configure src-mac for case A but all trafic is send only on one wireless link .
    Please help me to choose the more appropriate load balance method to load balance traffic between the 2 link for the case A and for the case B
    Please advise
    Thanks in advance

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Your Case A might be handled by port hashing, but unfortunately most Cisco platforms don't support it.
    Your Case B isn't much better, as you only have 3 hosts on each side, and according to your drawing, they are behind routers, so you don't want to use MAC hashes.  If you don't have port hashing, next best choice might be src-dest-IP hashing.  Again, though, with just 3 hosts, your distribution will likely not be very balanced, especially over shorter time intervals.
    To obtain best utilization of your links, you need some kind of better link bonding, such as MLPPP (unfortunately, usually won't scale to FE rates) or a hardware MUX.  Next best option, if you could route across the links, would be something like Cisco's OER/PfR which can dynamically load balance.

  • Solution load Balancing for two Servers  run Sun One Web Server 7.0

    Hi All ,
    I must configure load balancing web server for two server . Could you tell me Solution ?
    Please help
    Thanks .

    The following should help you configure Web Server to reverse proxy (load balance) to your two backend servers.
    [http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy|http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy]

  • Catalyst 6500 with CatOS ISCSI

    Hi, I'm configuring a Catalyst 6500 with for ISCSI.
    Following the recommendations I have to configure: portfast, jumbo frames, flow control and disable unicast storm control
    - Portfast: on the server and ISCSI SAN ports
        >
    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-qformat:yes;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
    mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
    line-height:115%;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:11.0pt;
    font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
    mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
    mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
    mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
    mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
    mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
    set spantree portfast
    - Jumbo frames: Set port jumbo
    - Flow Control:
         > set port flow control receive desired
    Questions:
    1. Where I have to configure flow control? only on the SAN ports and NIC servers? or server ports too?
    2. Unicast Storm control: how can i configure this option?
    Thanks

    We are having the same exact problem. We've done what you've tried with no luck also. Strange thing is that in another building we have the same setup but only with a 6148V blade and that Tandberg has no issues. We're using a 6148AF with the one we're having problems with. We've tried with a 6348 blade and it works fine. I'm thinking it's something with the 6148AF firmware (ver. 8.2(2)).
    Were you able to solve your problem?

  • Catalyst 6500 running IOS 12.2(33)SXI6 crashed (CSCsv77354)

    Hi,
    Today one of our customer reported their DMVPN Hub got crashed, analyzing the crash file I found that it crashed due to
    "Stack for process ACE HAPI running low" . The bug tool kit has a matching bug CSCsv77354 but the status is terminated since it is not re-producible. I dont know how shall we proceed further, shall we upgrade to SXJ IOS since this problem is not reported in that version.
    May I know if any one has experienced similar crash.
    Jun 30 16:06:47.099 UAE: %SYS-6-STACKLOW: Stack for process ACE HAPI running low, 0/6000
    %Software-forced reload
    Early Notification of crash condition..
    ---- Partial decode of process block ----
    Pid 234: Process "ACE HAPI" stack 0x47E82528 savedsp 0x500325B8
    Flags: analyze corrupt prefers_new
    Regards,
    Akhtar

    Regarding the first question, you are correct. The WAN image provides support for WAN modules, but the LAN image does not. Since your current image is IP services based, you do want to use IP services with WAN and K9 in it. example:
    s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI14.bin
    As for your second question, if you upgrade to 12.2(18r)S1, it should be sufficient to run later images like SXJ and IOS 15 as well.
    As for the last question, you can upgrade from the current image directly to SXJ with no issues as long as you have enough memory and flash space. There maybe some commands that you need to redo after the upgrade but nothing significant. Make sure to have a good backup of your config.
    HTH 

  • IPS-Portchannel-EtherChannel Load Balancing

    I have two 4506 switches and 2 IPS 4260
    I have problem med Interfaces unjoin and join portchannel
    GigabitEthernet3/23 left the port-channel Port-channel1
    GigabitEthernet3/23 joined port-channel Port-channel1
    The IPS interfaces
    UDVIK01_AWG_IPS# sh interfaces brief
    CC   Interface            Sensing State   Link   Inline Mode        Pair Status
    *    Management0/0        Disabled        Up
         GigabitEthernet0/1   Disabled        Down   Unpaired           N/A
         GigabitEthernet2/0   Enabled         Up     Inline-vlan-pair   N/A
         GigabitEthernet2/1   Enabled         Up     Inline-vlan-pair   N/A
         GigabitEthernet2/2   Disabled        Down   Unpaired           N/A
         GigabitEthernet2/3   Disabled        Down   Unpaired           N/A
    I have uploaded Debug file and other file of my configuration
    Best Regard
    Rene Rolsted

    Debug from switch:
    Dec  8 15:11:41.363: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: for agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:41.363: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: PAgP not enabled on agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_port_down: Gi3/23 Inform yes
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_invoke_port_down: Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: fec_unbundle: Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_change_vgc: gcchngreq == 0 for Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_change_vgc: Gi3/23 gcchngreq = 0 gc = 0
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: %EC-5-UNBUNDLE: Interface GigabitEthernet3/23 left the port-channel Port-channel1
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_delete_port_from_agport_internal: delete_port_from_agport: for port Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: delete port (Gi3/23) from agport (Po1)
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_delete_port_from_agport_list: afb->nports-- = 1 [Gi3/23]
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: Un-Bndl msg NOT send to PM for port Gi3/23 from Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:41.367: FEC: pagp_switch_reset_load_index: reading load-index for port Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_port_up: Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_invoke_port_up: Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: comparing GC values of Gi3/23 Gi3/24 flag = 1 1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_port_attrib_diff: Gi3/23 Gi3/24 same
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: GC values are compatable
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: fec_bundle: Gi3/23
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: add port (Gi3/23) to agport (Po1)
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_add_port_to_agport_list: afb->nports++ = 2 [Gi3/23]
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: %EC-5-BUNDLE: Interface GigabitEthernet3/23 joined port-channel Port-channel1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_add_port_to_agport_internal: msg to PM to bundle port Gi3/23 with Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_want_to_bundle: Bndl msg to PM for port Gi3/23 to Agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: for agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.363: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: PAgP not enabled on agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:11:45.367: FEC: pagp_switch_reset_load_index: reading load-index for port Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:08.370: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: for agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:08.370: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: PAgP not enabled on agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_port_down: Gi3/24 Inform yes
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_invoke_port_down: Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: fec_unbundle: Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_change_vgc: gcchngreq == 0 for Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_change_vgc: Gi3/24 gcchngreq = 0 gc = 0
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: %EC-5-UNBUNDLE: Interface GigabitEthernet3/24 left the port-channel Port-channel1
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_delete_port_from_agport_internal: delete_port_from_agport: for port Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: delete port (Gi3/24) from agport (Po1)
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_delete_port_from_agport_list: afb->nports-- = 1 [Gi3/24]
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: Un-Bndl msg NOT send to PM for port Gi3/24 from Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:08.374: FEC: pagp_switch_reset_load_index: reading load-index for port Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_port_up: Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_invoke_port_up: Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: comparing GC values of Gi3/24 Gi3/23 flag = 1 1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_port_attrib_diff: Gi3/24 Gi3/23 same
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_agc_compatable: GC values are compatable
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: fec_bundle: Gi3/24
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: add port (Gi3/24) to agport (Po1)
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_add_port_to_agport_list: afb->nports++ = 2 [Gi3/24]
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: %EC-5-BUNDLE: Interface GigabitEthernet3/24 joined port-channel Port-channel1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_add_port_to_agport_internal: msg to PM to bundle port Gi3/24 with Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_want_to_bundle: Bndl msg to PM for port Gi3/24 to Agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: for agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.362: FEC: pagp_switch_hotstandby: PAgP not enabled on agport Po1
    Dec  8 15:12:13.366: FEC: pagp_switch_reset_load_index: reading load-index for port Po1

  • Unequal Load Balance on Etherchannel (L2/SW3400ME)

    Hi, i have a problem with my L2 port-channel between 2 SW ME-3400-24TS-D (12.2(44)SE5), there is a unequal load balance and i don't know how to fixed. Should I change the load balance method?.
    All four ports have the same config, except one (int fa0/1 on SW_2) that have this commands:
    MAMANIVLN1P1IRA1#SH RUN INT FA0/1 | INC hold
     hold-queue 4096 in
     hold-queue 4096 out
    Should i change this hold-queue config?
    Here more outputs where you can see the diference, one link has 2mb and the other link has 60mb,, that's a big diference, i would like to know how to solve this:
    SW_1#sh int fa0/9 | inc (Desc|rate)
      Description: !!!!!! HACIA SW_2 !!!!!
      Queueing strategy: fifo
      5 minute input rate 2088000 bits/sec, 2065 packets/sec
      5 minute output rate 25000 bits/sec, 46 packets/sec
    SW_1#sh int fa0/10 | inc (Desc|rate)
      Description: PORTCHANNEL10 HACIA SW_2
      Queueing strategy: fifo
      5 minute input rate 1905000 bits/sec, 1948 packets/sec
      5 minute output rate 63348000 bits/sec, 6095 packets/sec
    SW_2#sh int fa0/1 | inc (Desc|rate) 
      Description: Hacia SW_1_Fa0/9
      Queueing strategy: fifo
      30 second input rate 27000 bits/sec, 48 packets/sec
      30 second output rate 2385000 bits/sec, 1996 packets/sec
    SW_2#sh int fa0/2 | inc (Desc|rate)
      Description: PORTCHANNEL10 HACIA SW_1
      Queueing strategy: fifo
      5 minute input rate 63567000 bits/sec, 6114 packets/sec
      5 minute output rate 1935000 bits/sec, 1976 packets/sec
    more outputs...
    SW_1#sh etherchannel load-balance 
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
            src-mac
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
    Non-IP: Source MAC address
      IPv4: Source MAC address
    SW_2#sh etherchannel load-balance 
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
            src-mac
    EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
    Non-IP: Source MAC address
      IPv4: Source MAC address
    SW_1#SH MAC ADDress-table INTerface po10 | inc Total
    Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 297
    SW_2#SH MAC ADDress-table INTerface po10 | inc Total
    Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 66
    In advance thanks for the help.

    Normally it will fairly well balance the traffic . There is no way to make sure each channel is exactly the same utilization wise . You can look at how it is load balanced and make a change from say mac to ip address if it looks like you aren't getting the balance you want . It would be very rare that you are going to fill one port on the channel without filling the rest almost the same .Exceptions would be if you most of your traffic is headed to one place like a certain server , even then if you used ip addresses in both directions as the load balance I think it would balance out pretty good. If it got to that point where one link was almost filled you would have to think about adding another port to the channel . This is a real good page http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml

  • Load balancing multiple J2ee servers - each running it's own CI

    Is it possible to load balance multiple J2ee servers(running Portal), both running it's own Central Instance?
    We do not have the resources (SAN storage) to implement MSCS for Portal...so instead we want to use two complete Portal servers HW load balanced with the ability to keep running in case one fails.
    thanks for any info !
    Linwood

    Hi Linwood,
    in a nutshell, the difference between an ordinary J2EE server instance and the central instance are the central services. The central services (enqueue server, message server) are only needed once. Basically, they are required for the communication between the server instances (and to the load balancer). What you should go for is a cluster installation with one central instance and another ordinary server instance (both running the SAP NetWeaver Portal). But be aware that you have to use the same database for both server instances (otherwise you cannot guarantee consistent data).
    For load balancing the two server you can use the SAP Web Dispatcher  or any other load balancer tool you like. 
    You will find more and detailed information on load balancing in the SAP Library. Have a look into section <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/2e/611724f410254ca12a3f396ec5ae85/frameset.htm">Java Cluster Architecture</a>.
    Hope I could help!
    Best regards,
    Martin

  • IDSM-2 load balancing on inline mode is it possible ..?

    Hi there .. I am currenty working on a project and need to find out as to whether etherchanelling load balancing can be configured between several IDSM-2 running on inline mode. The IPS 5.1 admin guide states that it is possible for IOS based switches having the IDSM-2 configured on promiscuous mode, however I have heard that it might also be possible to configure etherchannelling load balance when the IDSM-2 are on inline mode. Any help .. commments will be appreciated .. any links to refer to will be even better
    Thanks !!!

    To configure EtherChannel load balancing on IDSM-2, you must install Cisco IOS 12.2(18)SXE and have Supervisor Engine 720. Cisco IOS only supports promiscuous IDSM-2 EtherChanneling using VACL capture (not SPAN or monitor). Refer the URL
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps4077/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008055df92.html#wp1044800

  • Bootloader and IOS image into a Catalyst 6509 running hybrid mode

    Hi all,
    I have a Catalyst 6509 running CatOS and IOS (hybrid mode)
    The chassis is based on a SUP1A and a MSFC2
    The MSFC is using images:
    boot system bootflash:c6msfc2-is-mz.121-2.E
    boot bootldr bootflash:c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-2.E
    I would like to know if is possible to add the next command to the MSFC configuration in order to load the new image before erase the old one, even while the chassis boot using the old bootloader image:
    boot system tftp c6msfc2-pk2o3sv-mz.121-26.E2.bin 10.10.5.15
    Thanks.

    Thanks Amit, thanks Ankur,
    Yeah! I know about the limits of the bootflash space as the PCMCIA option.
    It is a bit complicated to explaint the situation here but I will try.
    Neither the actual CatOS or IOS will recognize the new PCMCIA we bought to this upgrade. :P
    First, I will upgrade CatOS using rommon and xmodem command in order to execute a new catos release that can view the PCMCIA, then I will format it and I will copy the new catos image and the new ios image there.
    Then I will change the catos boot config and I will do a reset.
    I must do that because the new release don't enter into the bootflash and the actual CatOS don't support boot from the network :P. It is CatOS 5.5.1 :PPP
    After that, I need also to upgrade the MSFC because as I read that the actual IOS won't see the PCMCIA filesystem. In order to do that I would like to prepare the MSFC to boot from a TFTP server and then modify the configuration to boot from sup-slot0: forever :)
    Let me know what do you think about this steps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • IDOC related Query

    hi i am adding one field VBKD-IHREZ in the IDOC. i have added following code in the Include which exists inside a User exit corresponding to fill Idoc Structure to BDC data structure. z1edk05 is the new segment which i have add in z1orders through we

  • Require TableFilter.java for NWDS 04s

    Hi, Please provide me code for TableFilter.java for NWDS 04s. I tried with the following pdf tutorial <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60d5b593-ba83-2910-28a9-a7a

  • Start-up program for LVDT transducer

    Hi everyone,  I am tasked to simplify a project based on getting transducer reading from LVDT using thirty-two channels. I am to use three-loop structures to build this program. I am currently stuck here, need tips on how to start? Much appreciated w

  • IChat Changes with OS 10.4.7 upgrade

    This is just to acknowledge that Apple finally got it right with the iChat changes in the latest OS upgrade. After following the endless advice from many of you through this forum with no good results and continuing degrading video rates or lack of a

  • SEM- BPS & BW -BPS

    Hi Iam working as a BW consultant, Iam interested in SEM? In SEM different modules is there, like BPS, BCS, CPM, and SRM which one is teh best for me? one more thing what is the differnce between SEM -BPS and BW -BPS? plese guide me iam bit confused?