Ethernet over Mains solution??

Hi All, at the moment my desktop PC is hardwired into the router but due to building work that needs to change, at least temporarily. So I’m thinking about Ethernet over Mains adaptors. While I’m doing it I would really like an adaptor by the TV. So I need three devices, one for the router, one for the TV and one for the desktop.
I know that these things don’t share surge adaptors and a few other things and I’m not quite sure about putting one on a standard extension lead, so I’m looking for adaptors with pass through mains.
If it makes a difference I already have a Devolo dLan 500 AVtriple+ on the way from Amazon that I ordered thinking it was a triple pack, not a single triple adaptor but £60+ I was expecting to get the solution for that not a single device. Also I don’t need them to be wireless and I only get 5mbps broadband and if I need a high volume transfer between devices, which is rare, I would be ok plugging into the router which is a home hub 2.
Having already messed up I am starting my research again but thought I would ask here in case somebody has already solved this or has any advice.
Thanks for any help.

Hi Thompson,
I have just set up a powerline network, using devolo devices.
So, basically you want to plug your router into a network device, so your internet connection can be shared remotely by your PC and your TV/Sky using ethernet cables? Devolo do three pack setups, in the following guises - the second option having powerline pass through connectors...
You could go for either this:
Devolo dLAN 500 Duo Network Kit
or this (power pass through):
Devolo dLAN 500 Duo Plus Network Kit
I am only stating devolo as I have knowledge of them, and are a piece of cake to set up - literally plug in and away you go, you don't even have to bother with the software that comes with them to monitor the network if you don't want to, although it is worth it as it will auto detect the firmware on the devices and let you know if there are updates available. 
Devolos support seems pretty good as well, I am currently in the middle of a very extensive email exchange with their support team in Germany because i emailed them purely enquiring why I couldn't see a device on an old laptop using their software.They have been very helpful so far.
Dare I say it I would stick with the 500mbps as devolo no longer produces the 200 versions, although are still available from various outlets.
You could buy another make, getting a two pack and a third single adaptor, but I don't think there will be much difference in price when all told. At least with the above packs they are all in one box.
For additional information, I don't find these drop off in terms of speed that much. I have a device plugged in upstairs which is connected to my router, then I have a 500Av Triple + Wireless downstairs, into which is linked a slingbox and my sky box, and a wii connected wirelessly. The transfer speed between the two devices shows 494mbs, so a drop off of 6mbs. I also have an older 200 Av in another room, which shows a transfer speed of around 178mbs.
Hope the above helps.

Similar Messages

  • Metro Ethernet over Docsis

    Hello Gurus,
    I would like to know a bit more about this tecnologie (Metro Ethernet over Docsis).
    I work for a cable companie and we would like to know the implicationd of implementing such a technologie.
    If we go for a CPE based aproach we only have to configure a CPE like the Cisco 1805 in each costumer end-point?
    Which configurations does the CMTS and backbone require?
    What are the maximum speed we can offer with this technologie running on HFC?
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    You might want to read this:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns522/ns3/metro_ethernet_white_paper.pdf

  • Security for Metro Ethernet over Fiber

    Is metro-ethernet over fiber (point-to-point) link secure ? Can someone sniff into the network (and see unencrypted data) over Metro-ethernet point-to-point link ?

    You might want to read this:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns522/ns3/metro_ethernet_white_paper.pdf

  • Ethernet over VMS

    Hi,
    Does anyone know what Ethernet over, or on, VMS is please ?
    Best regards,
    dfenceman

    In what context or application?
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • Can someone explain about frame header size in Ethernet over MPLS

    Can someone explain about frame header size in Ethernet over MPLS

    Hello Arun,
    Here is some explanation:
    http://cciethebeginning.wordpress.com/tag/eompls/
    Also I attached pcap file, you can open it in wireshark and look at entire packets. There are some pings 10.0.0.1 <-> 10.0.0.2 between CEs
    Best Regards
    Please rate all helpful posts and close solved questions

  • Ethernet over coax question

    I have a coax cable running from the front house to the back house and want to connect my router to the iMac back there that serves up music and movies etc to the rest of the house. It's currently connected via wifi, but there are dropouts etc.
    I've been pointed to a few different devices that can run ethernet over coax, such as this one:
    http://www.netsys-direct.com/proddet...NH-310C&cat=27
    there are a variety of them, and they all seem to say they have speeds in the 100mps to at the most 500 mps. My questions is this. How fast are current Airport and Ethernet speeds? I know they speak of Gigabit wireless, so does that mean 1000mps and up?
    If I'm currently using wireless in this case, do you think switching to coax would slow things down a lot, or would it work ok?
    thanks!

    802.11g aka "wireless-g" has a maximum theoretical speed of 54 megabits/second.
    802.11n "wireless-n", has a maximum theoretical speed of 300 megabits/second, but to attain that it requires near-perfect conditions. It's normal to observe less than half that in actual use.
    These vary according to many environmental phenomena that influence radio propagation. Observed speeds tend to be considerably less. "Gigabit Ethernet" isn't so influenced, but may also be less than 1000 Mb/s due to other network factors.

  • Sample Configuration For Ethernet over MPLS.

    I am looking for a sample configuration and scenario for the Ethernet over MPLS.I would appreciate if I get some explaination with it.How the LDP is configured for the directed sessions (as per Martini draft) and the auto discovery (as per kompella draft) with respect to Ethernet over MPLS.Cam anyone help me in this ?

    Here's a sample EoMPLS configuration on the PE routers:
    R1:
    interface Loopback0
    ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
    interface Ethernet0/0.10
    encapsulation dot1Q 10
    ! 10 = vcid must match the vcid configured on the other side
    mpls l2transport route 2.2.2.2 10
    R2:
    interface Loopback0
    ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
    interface Ethernet0/0.10
    encapsulation dot1Q 10
    mpls l2transport route 1.1.1.1 10
    The LDP directed session will be setup automatically by the router when the xconnect statement is configured.
    Cisco IOS doesn't support the Kompella Draft.
    For more information, see the following URL:
    http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t/122t15/atomt/ftatomtb.htm
    Hope this helps,

  • Ethernet over HDMI from ThinkPad E330 to Samsung TV

    Hello:
    I need to know if my lenovo ThinkPad E330 with HDMI 1.4 port can send ethernet over HDMI 1.4 EC cable to a new Samsung TV with HDMI 1.4a port, or vice versa. The TV has DNLA and other internet features.
    Thanks

    In principle, HDMI 1.4 includes EC in it's standard, but it's pretty uncommon AFAIK.
    W520: i7-2720QM, Q2000M at 1080/688/1376, 21GB RAM, 500GB + 750GB HDD, FHD screen
    X61T: L7500, 3GB RAM, 500GB HDD, XGA screen, Ultrabase
    Y3P: 5Y70, 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD, QHD+ screen

  • Ethernet over Coax advice pls. HFC or uBR ?

    Hi Guys,
    Am well out of my depth and was looking for some advice on providing ethernet over a customers existing coxial network. EoC.
    The customer is a large holiday resort who provide via coxial cable, TV to each of their cabins.
    The system that they have is a WISI Topline headend system with
    Following products:
    http://www.wisi.de/cgi-bin/online_katalog.pl?prod_id=263
    http://www.wisi.de/cgi-bin/online_katalog.pl?prod_id=772
    I have attached some images of these products.
    What i need is to provide wifi out to the cabins and am looking ofr a system that can either provide an ethernet connection or a residential router with wireless built in.
    I have been looking at universial Broadband Routers -
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8474/index.html
    and
    HFC products
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns848/networking_solutions_solution_category.html
    I understand i am not providing much information but this is not my area of knowledge.
    Thanks in advance.

    Can you please provide some examples of such gateways that can carry this thoughput?
    On the same sidenote: I tried to use a different Router at my office and replace the AE from Apple with an Asus rt-n56u that that been tested to provide massive throughput (one if not the fastest routers out there) but it's a mainstream products not a high end enterprise one. Moreover i would approach the same way for home if not for countless problems i encountered with this router (eg: router will not forward VPN properly).

  • Ethernet over hdmi?

    does apple tv support ethernet over hdmi?

    There is a reason.   The whole reason why Ethernet over HDMI exists is to make it possible to have one physical Ethernet connection provide the needed connectivity to several devices tthat have HDMI.   Ethernet over HDMI eliminates the need to have a local switch.

  • Given wireless range of Time Capsule is 150', will this work? Put DSL modem on phone line in garage, connect ethernet to small office bldg (125') and connect separate ethernet to main house (200'). Time capsule on each end (or Airport Express)? Thx

    Given Time Capsule wireless range is 150', will this solution work? In detached garage, connect DSL modem to phone line, then connect ethernet cable to DSL modem and run 125' to small office bldg. Connect separate ethernet cable to DSL modem and run 200' to main house. Put time capsule or Airport Express in each bldg resulting in separate wireless networks in each? Thanks.

    This will work very well. You can run a CAT5e (or CAT6) Ethernet cable up to 330 feet...or 100 meters...with virtually no signal loss.
    CAT6 costs a bit more, but will handle next generation Ethernet speeds, so if you have a choice, suggest that you opt for CAT6 cabling.

  • Ethernet over MPLS/VPLS

    Hi,
    I would appreciate if you answer my following questions :
    - As you know EoMPLS is based on physical port, but how about VPLS?
    - Could you tell me minimum router which supports VPLS?
    - Any other solutions for transfer ethernet frames over MPLS except VPLS and EoMPLS?
    - I think VPLS is better EoMPLS because it supports multipoint to multipoint ,is it true? could you please tell me VPLS advantage and disadvatage?
    Regards,
    M.Arshad rad

    Ehlo ,
    1)EoMPLS is available in port and vlan mode.Since VPLS
    is actually using martini encapsulations ( both lasserre and kompella ) it is possible to use raw and tagged modes.
    2)IMHO only Cisco router that supports VPLS now is 7600.Additionaly VFI can be only assigned to SVI.
    3)Juniper CCC ( RSVP based ) - but obviously you won't use it since it's proprietary ( nevertherless it has nice feature like lsp-stiching ) and IOS couldn't signall it .
    4) VPLS is designed to support p-to-mp and therefore
    it's more complex.IF you don't need its features you can stick with raw p2p martini , which is relatively simple and widely implemented ( no problem for example to configure it between ios and junos boxes ).
    pm

  • Ethernet over STM-1 (SDH)

    We wish to extend our Ethernet connection from our POP to a remote site over a leased STM-1 circuit. A lot of suppliers had been suggesting different hardware like RAD RIC-155Ge (http://www.rad.com/10/Gigabit_Ethernet_over_STM_1_OC_3_NTU/2486/#), etc. We wish to know if Cisco has cost-effective low-end hardware that can do similar solution, as we prefer to standardised with our Cisco hardwares, if yes, kindly name the hardware, part number.

    We are doing something very similiar with the 15310-MA. Its not the cheapest solution but it had the features and support that we wanted. The box comes in a SONET version and SDH version.
    We are using it to transport 2 gige's over an oc48 wave in the US and internationally we use it to transport 1 gige over stm4 leased lines (a gige interface plus the 15310-MA was still cheaper than buying the stm-4 line card for the platform we use.)
    Since you are doing SDH, the 15305 might work just as well and it should be more comparable in price to the RAD.

  • Shared ethernet over wifi changes 'second machine' subnet

    I have a Mac mini (MM) that I connect to the LAN via an access point. I also have a Linux laptop that I want to also share on the LAN. I've connected the laptop into the ethernet port on the MM and I can browse the net. The problem is that where the local subnet is 192.168.x.x the laptop has received an ip address of 192.168.2.x via DHCP.
    Consequemntly, I cannot SSH into the laptop via my MM as the two machines now reside on different subnets. I had thought originally that when connecting to a MM, this would 'share' the ethernet port and would simply pass packets between the router and the 'second machine' thus using the MM as in 'bridge' mode.
    Is there any reason why the second machine has now received an ip address on a different subnet?

    You do need to turn on AFP sharing.. since SMB is not used by TM.. although I have to admit to some confusion..
    What application are you using that is spitting out rsync errors?? That is not Time Machine. Are you trying to do this by rsync directly?
    You clearly do not have sufficient permissions on the Mac Pro to whatever directory you have set.. make sure you do the rsync with su login.. and make sure on the pro you set full permissions to everyone.
    "failed: Permission denied (13)", "*** Skipping everything below this failed directory ***", "failed: No such file or directory (2)", and "rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at /SourceCache/rsync/rsync-45/rsync/main.c(992) [sender=2.6.9]".
    Have you tried Carbon Copy Cloner?? That might be worth it.
    Much better than Time Machine for backup over the network.
    It is rsync based.
    time machine app used in the guide appears to be an older version pre OS X 10.10.3
    Another excellent reason to avoid TM.. it is flakey as !heaven in Yosemite.

  • Does TM have any real functional advantages over other solutions?

    Hi All
    Looking at possible network backup solutions. Does TM have any real functional advantages over something like SuperDuper? I'm not really looking for an "archive" solution, which is I think how a lot of people perhaps incorrectly view TM, but just something that will allow me to easily recover from corrupt/crashed system - TM seems rather overkill and complex for that?
    Any advice/views appreciated...jeremy

    Jeremy Trask wrote:
    Hi All
    Looking at possible network backup solutions. Does TM have any real functional advantages over something like SuperDuper? I'm not really looking for an "archive" solution, which is I think how a lot of people perhaps incorrectly view TM, but just something that will allow me to easily recover from corrupt/crashed system - TM seems rather overkill and complex for that?
    Officially, TM does not work over a network, except via Time Capsule or to another Mac running Leopard on the same local network: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1733
    Some of us are able to use a USB drive attached to an Airport Extreme, or a shared drive on a Mac running Leopard or Snow Leopard on the same local network. Some others are using various NAS devices that claim to be TM-compatible, but often with various difficulties.
    So if you're set on a network solution, your options with TM are limited.
    CarbonCopyCloner does not work to any network destination, and I don't think SD does, either.
    Other than that, TM has two main advantages over the "clones:"
    Being able to do hourly incremental backups of new and changed items very quickly, it gives you an excellent chance of recovering something that was changed or deleted in error, or that got corrupted. Most other apps, especially CCC and SD, if they're backing-up your entire system, in most cases just aren't practical to run more than once or twice a day.
    Second, since every TM backup is, in effect, a full one, you can restore your entire system to the exact state it was in at the time of any backup, even if it was a previous version of Leopard or Snow Leopard. Many folks have, for example, successfully and easily downgraded from SL back to Leopard when they found they had incompatible apps or other problems.

Maybe you are looking for