Evaluate TS expression in LabVIEW
I am looking for an example of using "EvaluateEX" TS API method in LabVIEW.
I would like to get back the return value of the expression evaluation. Any example will be welcome.
Jean-Louis SCHRICKE
├ CTA - Certified TestStand Architect (2008 & 2010 & 2014)
├ CTD - Certified TestStand Developer (2004 & 2007)
└ CLD - Certified LabVIEW Developer (2003 & 2005)
Hi Jean-Louis,
Try this example.
The sequence has an ActiveX API call and a LabVIEW 6.1 NumericLimit step type call.
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer
Attachments:
UsingEvaluateEx.seq 29 KB
TS_-_EvaluateEx.vi 38 KB
Similar Messages
-
Hi all,
I am trying to evaluate a string expression against rows of data. If the data satisfys that condition/expression then its selected otherwirse its not.
To re-iterate how to evaluate a string expression like: "value < 1"
against data values like: 0, 1, 2 ...n
Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Here's the code I am using:
* Evaluates the Expression Either return True or False
* @return
public boolean evalExpression() {
boolean retval = true;
// Identify the conditional process step
if (this.isConditional()) {
// get the inputs
for (int i = 0; i < myInputs.size(); i++) {
ContainerDataElement containerDataElement = (ContainerDataElement) myInputs
.elementAt(i);
String data = containerDataElement.getValueAsString();
// Get the conditions
for (int j = 0; j < myProcessConditions.size(); j++) {
ProcessCondition pc = (ProcessCondition) myProcessConditions
.elementAt(j);
Boolean condition = new Boolean(pc.getExpression());
// Evaluate the expression against the data elements
if (condition.booleanValue()) {
retval = true;
else {
retval = false;
return retval;
}ProcessCondion holds the Expression but I need to match the value the expression matches.
A bit like equals example I am trying out now:
public boolean evalExpression() {
boolean retval = true;
// Identify the conditional process step
if (this.isConditional()) {
// get the inputs
for (int i = 0; i < myInputs.size(); i++) {
ContainerDataElement containerDataElement = (ContainerDataElement) myInputs
.elementAt(i);
String data = containerDataElement.getValueAsString();
com.aim.common.DebugLog.debug("dataELEMENTS--------"
+ data.toString());
// Get the conditions
for (int j = 0; j < myProcessConditions.size(); j++) {
ProcessCondition pc = (ProcessCondition) myProcessConditions
.elementAt(j);
com.aim.common.DebugLog.debug("ProcessCondition--------"
+ pc.toString());
Boolean condition = new Boolean(pc.getExpression());
com.aim.common.DebugLog.debug("condition--------"
+ condition.toString());
// Evaluate the expression against the data elements
if (containerDataElement.equals(condition)) {
com.aim.common.DebugLog.debug("conditionEVALUATED--------"
+ retval);
retval = true;
else {
retval = false;
return retval;
} -
Hi Guys,
I need to write java command line program to evaluate a mathematical
expression input by user without parantheses using Stack approach.
Can anyone give me the clue how to start of with.
Is it possible to evaluate the expression in infix notation directly using stack, without converting to prefix notation.
Thanks in advanceIs there something nicer?You can also use java 6 and javascripts. I saw a
thread where someone posted an example.
KajI posted something a couple of weeks back (reply #2):
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5137192
Of course, you don't need to bind any variables and can do it like this:import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import javax.script.ScriptException;
public class ScriptDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ScriptEngineManager manager = new ScriptEngineManager();
ScriptEngine engine = manager.getEngineByName("js");
try {
String expression = "3+4";
Object result = engine.eval(expression);
System.out.println(expression+" = "+result);
} catch(ScriptException se) {
se.printStackTrace();
output: 3+4 = 7.0
*/ -
The Expression Engine failed to evaluate the expression for a Subportal Act
Anyone seen this error before and know of a fix? We're getting it on our 6.1 MP1 portal after we deployed our custom sso solution.
"62 12-19-2007 12:58:37.292 Error Portal_UI_Infrastructure portal.c27mynrspaxr01.webadm .NET #32 com.plumtree.portaluiinfrastructure.condition.ConditionTypeManager The Expression Engine failed to evaluate the expression for a Subportal Action.
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at com.plumtree.portaluiinfrastructure.condition.ConditionTypeManager.EvaluateExpressionForSubportalAction(AActivitySpace asCurrentSpace, IApplication application, IXPRequest xpRequest, Object ptUserSession) in e:\buildroot\Release\portalui\6.1.x\ptwebui\portaluiinfrastructure\dotnet\prod\src\com\plumtree\portaluiinfrastructure\condition\ConditionTypeManager.cs:line 260 <ptLogMsgEnd>"As far as i know this is a harmless error. Our portal generated that message every time someone browsed /portal/server.pt.
-
What are the main differences between Signal Express and Labview?
National Instruments provides a matrix so one can quickly compare the
various versions of Labview but no comparison of Signal Express with
Labview. Hence how does Signal Express compare with Labview? What
are some of the things one can do with Labview one can't do with
Signal Express?
Howardhrh1818 wrote: Which version of Labview are you referring to? I don't consider the graphical version of Labview to be a full featured programming language. LabWindows/CVI is by a long shot a lot closer to being a full featured programming language than the graphical version of Labview.
Howard,
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. There is no "graphical version" of LabVIEW, there is just LabVIEW. Click on the article "Is LabVIEW a general purpose programming language?" written by the Jeff K. for some easy reading from a few years ago. It is all still true (except that object oriented features and recursion have been added in recent versions).
One of the main points at this years NI-week was the discussion of how processor development is switching more and more to multicore designs to improve performance because a simple boost in clock frequency is becoming more difficult. Linear, text based code is not well suited to take advantage of multticore design, while the dataflow based LabVIEW programming language automatically scales well to multiple processor cores, without any need to rewrite older code. I would say that only LabVIEW is futureproof in this respect. LabVIEW programmers are not wimps that are simply too stupid to write text based code. LabVIEW is not a toy language for people that don't want to learn a "real" programming language.
LabVIEW is arguably the best programming language in terms of getting things done! I've never felt limited with LabVIEW and my programs often don't even have anything to do with data acquisition or instrument control. The difference between text based code vs. LabVIEW is like "DOS vs. Windows", "Radio vs. HD television". "Trilobyte vs. Homo sapiens" (sorry Putnam ). Text based code is monochrome, archaic and outdated and its linearity imposes unecessary constraints on the programmer that can only be (partially) overcome by wasting even more time throwing even more code at it.
Sure, a seasoned text based programmer will initially have problems adapting to LabVIEW, just because you would need to adapt to and embrace the power of dataflow and not try to make a literal translation of the text code to LabVIEW, retaining old habits. If you get stuck, come back and ask here in the forum.
You were looking for object oriented features and failed. All you need to do is a quick site search. All the information is out there. Just because you cannot find it in the first five sentences of the glossy brochure does not mean it does not exist. Maybe you want to read one of the application notes such as:
LabVIEW Object-Oriented Programming: The Decisions Behind the Design
In general, you should avoid judgement until you have all information. Your opinions seem quite biased and superficial and not really based on hard facts.
Initially you asked about the difference between signal express and LabVIEW.
hrh1818 wrote:
> What kind of measurments do you want to do and what kind of requirements do you have?
> You can also see for yourself and download evaluation version of both.
No thanks, there has to be a better way to get an answer to my
question than get involved in a two month study project.
If you would answer the first question quoted above, we could certainly help you with the decision. Isn't that the main purpose of this thread?
You can also contact your local LabVIEW Field Engineer to go over your requirements and help you make a decision. They usually know their stuff!
Message Edited by altenbach on 09-02-2007 11:51 PM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time . -
Using expression trees to evaluate an expression
i have a three parameters like age, sex and location. Now, my users while registration, can specify an expression like, age > 25 and age < 30 and sex = male OR location = 'London'. Now i get an incoming request which has certain values for age, sex and location (say: age=26 sex = male location = 'London'). Then i want to get a list of all the users registered with me who satisfies the incoming criteria. Do you think an expression tree would help me in this case? can pls someone guide me?
actually i have a fixed list of operators and operands. The only variation being that users while registration might use only a subset of those operators and operands e.g. some users may just give an expression such as 'sex=male' and some other users could give an expression such as 'sex = female AND age > 21'. So when i get an incoming request saying sex = female and age = 22 then only my second kind of users would be selected and suppose if i get an incoming message like sex = male , age = 33 then my first kind of users (though no age is specified by that user while registration but still he would be selected as the expression said sex = male and that is one of the parameters of the incoming request) would be selected. Now how do i create such a solution using an expression tree, which would evaluate the incoming request and then match it with the expression specified by the various users to find the list of those users who qualify according to the incoming request parameters. any ideas??
-
Labview 7 Express versus Labview
I've been asked to help someone with a data acquisition project. Unfortunately, they know less about Labview and related software than I do. They say they have "Labview 7 Express". Is this an old version of signal express? I currently use Labview 8.2/8.5, so how would this Labview 7 Express compare to it in terms of functionality? Is what they have too outdated to bother with?
Thanks.7.0 is a great version (I use it daily), but there are some differences in functionality (7 has no project environment, no LVOOP, etc.) and there are comparison matrices to show you the new features in each version.
The biggest hurdle would be that even if the code is compatible, you can't save code from 8.2\8.5 to 7.0. You would have to get 8.0 and 7.1 and do a save for previous in each of those versions. Under those circumstances it might be easier to just make sure you both have the same version.
Try to take over the world! -
Evaluate Regular expression complexity
Hi all
I've a problem on regular expression usage in my application.
I'm using a regular expression to identify objects and fetch them to be served depending on an input string with has to be matched.
each object has a property representing a regular expression to be matched to be candidate for fetching.
my program receive an external input string, then loops on the full objects collection identifying which are the object whose regular expression match the input stream.
doing an example:
obj1) key = "J*SDK"
obj2) key = "Ja*6*"
obj3) key = "JEE*"
if the input string is "Java 6.0 SDK" obj1 and obj2 are cadidate, while obj3 is discarded.
up to now everithing is fine, now here is my question:
i want only one object as output and I want the one best matching my input string.
this means that
-> obj1 is matching 4 chatacter ans has only one wildchar
-> obj2 is matching 3 characters and has two wildcard
so obj2 is discarded since it's regular expression is more complex than the obj1 one
my problem is HOW to evaulate correctly such complexity for each candidate object to be able to choose my best object.
is there some formal rule / api for this?
I'd like to match all wildcards into the regex, but doing this "by hand" would surely result in some bug due to some missing case, so a "third party" API or a grammar rule would be useful.
hoping for you help.
regards
Michele Sacchettiok, after days and days of research i came up to this solution:
1) I used this (http://www.brics.dk/automaton) package for regular expression which let me access the internal state automa data
2) use the getShortestExample() method to retrieve the shortest string matching the given regExp
3) evaluate the Levenshtein Distance between the given string and the one to be matched
PROs:
1) the regexp logic is fully handled by the same state machine which take cares of pattern matching in the first phase
2) the library provide me a non-regexp string to be used with comparison (e.g Levenshtein Distance evaluation)
CONs:
1) the methods getShortestExample is unaware of string to be matched, so if i use "aab|aaa" to match "aab" the method gets the first shortest sort alfabetically, that is "aaa", so I get a LD of 1 even if it should be 0, but it's quite a good deal for my application.
@endasil : your solution rely on grouping, and is based on a pre-parsing done manually so it basically went back to the "manual" parsing i wanted to avoid
Another way I'd like to give a try but had to give up was to use ANTLR (www.antlr.org) to create a parser for regular expression and then evaluating the resulting "tree size" of the parser, but wasn't able to find a formal description of RegExp grammar on the net.
do you have any suggestion or comment on my solution (or other to give a try? ) -
Using Express Write LabVIEW File to store data in subprogram doesn't overwrite.
The main program is an Event Structure that controls four other subprograms. In the subprograms the data is stored in the express IV Write LabVIEW Measurement File set up to overwrite the collected data. When the subprogram is stopped with the main still open, then restarted, the file is appended not overwritten. It appends where the last time the previous file was stopped.
There is an input to the Wrive LabVIEW Measurement File which is entitled 'reset.' Make sure that is set to true so that the file writing process starts over each time data enters the Express VI.
John M -
Operating Signal Express with Labview 7.1
Hey,
I have just recently installed Signal Express as a portion of the Sound & Vibration Measurement Suite and teh Sound & Measurement Assistant front end works well. When I attempt to start a new VI in Labview 7.1, I am unable to insert tools from the order analysis menu.
Do I need to upgrade Labview or is there another solution
Thanks
DougHello Doug.
Thank you for contacting National Instruments.
The readme of Sound and Vibration Measurement Suite 5.0 states that you must have LabVIEW 8.2 or later Full Development System or Professional Development System installed and properly licensed in order to run this application successfully. So, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it appears that you will not be able to use this Measurement Suite inside of LabVIEW 7.1. As further confirmation of this, do you see any S&V or Order Analysis VI's on your functions palette in LabVIEW? If you don't, this will indicate that the functionality for LabVIEW was not installed because of an incompatibility between the toolkit and the version of LabVIEW.
Let me know if I have explained this well. If there is anything else I can do for you to help you through this, please let me know. I will be more than happy to help!
Brian F
Applications Engineer
National Instruments -
Evaluate binding expressions #{...} from Bean methods?
Hello all,
is it possible to evaluate the binding expressions that are usually given in the JSP page (e.g. #{someObject.someProperty} ) from a Bean method?
I am currently searching for a more convenient way of accessing the resource bundle from a validator and could imagine an access over #{msg.someText}.Hello all,
is it possible to evaluate the binding expressions that are usually given in the JSP page (e.g. #{someObject.someProperty} ) from a Bean method?
I am currently searching for a more convenient way of accessing the resource bundle from a validator and could imagine an access over #{msg.someText}. -
Thread to evaluate arithmetic expressions
I'm trying to write a program that evalutaes arithmetic expression concurrently using Java concurency primitives. The idea behind the threading is to avoid multiple evaluations of common subexpression. I have attached the code that I have written so far but was hoping someone could offer me a hand with the evaluate() and run() methods contained at the end of the program. Thanks.
public class Example {
public static void main(String[] args) {
BinaryOp plus = new BinaryOp() {
public int apply(int n1, int n2) {
return n1 + n2;
BinaryOp times = new BinaryOp() {
public int apply(int n1, int n2) {
return n1 * n2;
Arith e1 = new Operator(plus, new Number(4), new Number(5));
Arith e2 = new Operator(plus,new Operator(times, new Number(3), e1),
new Operator(plus, e1, new Number(6)));
Arith e3 = new Operator(times, e2, e2);
System.out.println(e3.evaluate());
interface BinaryOp {
// An operator that can be applied to two numbers
int apply(int n1, int n2);
interface Arith {
// An arithmetic expression that can be evaluated.
int evaluate();
class Number implements Arith {
private int n;
Number(int n) {
this.n = n;
public int evaluate() { // A number evaluates to itself.
return n;
class Operator implements Arith, Runnable {
private BinaryOp op;
private Arith e1;
private Arith e2;
private boolean done = false;
private int result = 0; // holds the result of previous evaluation
Operator(BinaryOp op, Arith e1, Arith e2) {
this.op = op;
this.e1 = e1;
this.e2 = e2;
(new Thread(this)).start();
public int evaluate() {
public void run() {
}I'm trying to write a program that evalutaes arithmetic expression
concurrently using Java concurency primitives. The idea behind the
threading is to avoid multiple evaluations of common subexpression. Interesting ... the main problem however is to find those common
subexpressions. Most of the evaluation of those common subexpressions
can be done in the parse/compile phase though, effectively elliminating
the need for threads, e.g. (foo+bar)-(foo+bar) can be deduced to be
equal to zero if both 'foo' and 'bar' happen to referential transparent,
i.e. they don't have side effects.
What you're doing now is just starting a new thread for every binary operator.
This is, most likely, not what you want. The strategy of what thread to
start for which subexpression must have layed out the sequence of
threads to start before actual evaluation is started (also see above).
kind regards,
Jos -
Jstl: ExpressionEvaluator.evaluate versus Expression.evaluate
Hi,
Reading the jstl API, I noticed the method ExpressionEvaluator.evaluate().
On the other hand, ExpressionEvaluator also returns an Expression, which has its own evaluation method: Expression.evaluate().
Isn't this redundant ? Which method would be used on which occasion ?
Also, I was wondering: do I understand correctly, that one could override the ExpressionEvaluator ? So if I write my own evaluator, I could make it so that "${2+2}" evaluates to, say, "5" ?
Thanks very much.Hi,
Reading the jstl API, I noticed the method ExpressionEvaluator.evaluate().
On the other hand, ExpressionEvaluator also returns an Expression, which has its own evaluation method: Expression.evaluate().
Isn't this redundant ? Which method would be used on which occasion ?
Also, I was wondering: do I understand correctly, that one could override the ExpressionEvaluator ? So if I write my own evaluator, I could make it so that "${2+2}" evaluates to, say, "5" ?
Thanks very much. -
How does one evaluate an expression stored as a VARCHAR 2 in a table?
I am attempting to write a single SQL statement that will select three columns of data from a table and based on the value of a string in one column perform a calculation using the other two columns. Here is an example. TableX contains three columns. For simplicity sake let's say Col1 and Col2 are Number(5) and Col3 is a VARCHAR2(25).
TableX
Col1 Col2 Col3
5 7 Col1+Col2
10 3 Col1*Col2
20 5 Col1/Col2
I would like to write an SQL statement like 'select Col1, Col2, evaluate(Col3) as "Eval" from TableX' and get the following result set back.
Col1 Col2 Eval
5 7 12
10 3 30
20 5 4
Is there an Oracle provided function like the hypothetical evaluate() provided above that will do this?
One potential solution would be to write a stored procedure that accepts the three columns as parameters and then performs an execute immediate and returns the result. However, I would like a more dynamic utility so I don't have to be resticted to a preset number of columns (3 in this example).
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
MattMatthew:
There is no evaluate function in Oracle, and as far as I know, there is no way to do what you want solely in sql. However, this function should do the trick.
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_eval (
2 p_tab_name IN VARCHAR2,
3 p_rowid IN ROWID,
4 p_calc_col IN VARCHAR2) RETURN NUMBER IS
5
6 sqlstr VARCHAR2(4000);
7 result NUMBER;
8 BEGIN
9 sqlstr:= 'SELECT '||p_calc_col||' FROM '||p_tab_name||' WHERE rowid = :b';
10 EXECUTE IMMEDIATE sqlstr INTO result USING p_rowid;
11 RETURN result;
12 END;
13 /
Function created.
SQL> CREATE TABLE jtest (col1 number,col2 number,col3 varchar2(50));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (5, 7, 'Col1+Col2');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (10, 3, 'Col1*Col2');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (20, 5, 'Col1/Col2');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT col1,col2,col3,MY_EVAL('jtest',rowid,col3) evald
2 FROM jtest
3 /
COL1 COL2 COL3 EVALD
5 7 Col1+Col2 12
10 3 Col1*Col2 30
20 5 Col1/Col2 4
SQL> DROP TABLE jtest;
Table dropped.
SQL> CREATE TABLE jtest (col1 number,col2 number,col3 number,col4 varchar2(50));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (5, 7, 2, '(Col1+Col2)/Col3');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (10, 3, 5, 'Col1*(Col2+Col3)');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO jtest values (20, 5, 2, 'Col1/Col2/Col3');
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> SELECT col1,col2,col3,col4,MY_EVAL('jtest',rowid,col4) evald
2 FROM jtest;
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 EVALD
5 7 2 (Col1+Col2)/Col3 6
10 3 5 Col1*(Col2+Col3) 80
20 5 2 Col1/Col2/Col3 2This could easily be extended to handle character functions as well.
John -
Evaluate xmla expression in a variable
Hi,
I have a xmla code which I'm trying to put it in a variable. While evaluating the expression I'm getting the error as
The expression might contain an invalid token, an incomplete token, or an invalid element. It might not be well-formed, or might be missing part of a required element such as a parenthesis.
Here is my xmla expression
"Select '
<Batch xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
<ErrorConfiguration xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200" xmlns:ddl300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300" xmlns:ddl300_300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300" xmlns:ddl400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400" xmlns:ddl400_400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400">
<KeyNotFound>IgnoreError</KeyNotFound>
</ErrorConfiguration>
<Parallel>
<Process xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200" xmlns:ddl300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300" xmlns:ddl300_300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300" xmlns:ddl400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400" xmlns:ddl400_400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400">
<Object>
<DatabaseID>IIS_Version2</DatabaseID>
<DimensionID>Application</DimensionID>
</Object>
<Type>ProcessAdd</Type>
<DataSource xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200" xmlns:ddl300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300" xmlns:ddl300_300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300" xmlns:ddl400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400" xmlns:ddl400_400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400" xmlns:dwd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0" xsi:type="RelationalDataSource" dwd:design-time-name="1a3cb292-9bce-4c59-a182-177d6b3506ff" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
<ID>IISDW</ID>
<Name>IISDW</Name>
<ConnectionString>Provider=SQLNCLI11.1;Data Source=CO1MSFTSQLHKT02;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=IISDW</ConnectionString>
<!--<ImpersonationInfo>
<ImpersonationMode>ImpersonateAccount</ImpersonationMode>
<Account>phx\v-chveng</Account>
<ImpersonationInfoSecurity>passwordremoved</ImpersonationInfoSecurity>
</ImpersonationInfo>
<Timeout>PT0S</Timeout>-->
</DataSource>
<DataSourceView xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200" xmlns:ddl300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300" xmlns:ddl300_300="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300" xmlns:ddl400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400" xmlns:ddl400_400="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400" xmlns:dwd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0" dwd:design-time-name="b0b61205-c64d-4e34-afae-6d4d48b93fb3" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
<ID>IISDW</ID>
<Name>IISDW</Name>
<DataSourceID>IISDW</DataSourceID>
<Schema>
<xs:schema id="IISDW" xmlns="" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:msdata="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata" xmlns:msprop="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msprop">
<xs:element name="IISDW" msdata:IsDataSet="true" msdata:UseCurrentLocale="true" msprop:design-time-name="a6676059-1f9d-4cf2-8dcf-40b8f31e3332">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xs:element name="Application" msprop:design-time-name="6022ab52-0da7-49db-a3d3-b38704d0559b" msprop:IsLogical="True" msprop:FriendlyName="Application" msprop:DbTableName="Application" msprop:TableType="View" msprop:Description="" msprop:QueryDefinition="SELECT Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, [Timestamp]), 0) AS [Timestamp], ServerName, CAST(ServerName AS char(3)) AS DataCenter, CS_URI_Stem, CAST(HashBytes("'MD5'",Application + ServerName + CS_URI_Stem + CAST(DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, [Timestamp]), 0) AS varchar(24))) AS uniqueidentifier) AS Server_URI_Identity
FROM IIS_6 AS a LEFT OUTER JOIN
Dimension_Pointer AS b ON a.Application = b.Application
WHERE (b.ProcessedFlag = 0) AND (a.Application = "+(DT_WSTR, 100) @[User::Application]+")
GROUP BY Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, [Timestamp]), 0), ServerName, CS_URI_Stem" msprop:QueryBuilder="SpecificQueryBuilder">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="Application" msprop:design-time-name="8b794def-ecf7-48c5-8f41-8829e00cf235" msprop:DbColumnName="Application" msprop:FriendlyName="Application" minOccurs="0">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="255" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="Timestamp" msdata:ReadOnly="true" msprop:design-time-name="00274b1e-7459-4197-8a22-f2f5de0c4af1" msprop:DbColumnName="Timestamp" msprop:FriendlyName="Timestamp" type="xs:dateTime" />
<xs:element name="ServerName" msprop:design-time-name="793900a3-304a-45a4-8f3f-87352b3fb70f" msprop:DbColumnName="ServerName" msprop:FriendlyName="ServerName" minOccurs="0">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="255" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="DataCenter" msdata:ReadOnly="true" msprop:design-time-name="6cfa5bef-833b-4ac1-bfde-1b7a89516140" msprop:DbColumnName="DataCenter" msprop:FriendlyName="DataCenter" minOccurs="0">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="3" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="CS_URI_Stem" msprop:design-time-name="4cee9248-c545-4ff1-8887-c553e2932403" msprop:DbColumnName="CS_URI_Stem" msprop:FriendlyName="CS_URI_Stem" minOccurs="0">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="4000" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="Server_URI_Identity" msdata:DataType="System.Guid, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089" msdata:ReadOnly="true" msprop:design-time-name="6666d716-ac3c-4a5a-a331-9398a6bbd8cc" msprop:DbColumnName="Server_URI_Identity" msprop:FriendlyName="Server_URI_Identity" type="xs:string" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:unique name="Constraint1" msprop:IsLogical="True" msdata:PrimaryKey="true">
<xs:selector xpath=".//Application" />
<xs:field xpath="Server_URI_Identity" />
<xs:field xpath="Timestamp" />
</xs:unique>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
<IISDW xmlns="" />
</Schema>
</DataSourceView>
<WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
</Process>
</Parallel>
</Batch>' as ProcesAdd
can anyone help me plzHi Katherine,
Thanks for your reply;
Here is my Control flow which gives you some idea what I'm trying to do:
I'm using a for each loop container and inside it I have a Execute SQL task which generate the XMLA script (which I have passed it in a variable for which I used the connection type as ADO.net ); later I have written a script to check wheather it is returning
the correct xmla script or not and than processing the dimension.
Everything works good until the Script task and when it comes to the Process ADD it fails.
EXECUTE SQL TASK (Get XMLA Query processADD) variable value:
"SELECT '<Batch xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">
<ErrorConfiguration xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\">
<KeyNotFound>IgnoreError</KeyNotFound>
</ErrorConfiguration>
<Parallel>
<Process xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\">
<Object> <DatabaseID>IIS_Version2</DatabaseID> <DimensionID>Application</DimensionID>
</Object>
<Type>ProcessAdd</Type>
<DataSource xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\" xmlns:dwd=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0\" xsi:type=\"RelationalDataSource\" dwd:design-time-name=\"1a3cb292-9bce-4c59-a182-177d6b3506ff\" xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">
<ID>IISDW</ID>
<Name>IISDW</Name>
<ConnectionString>Provider=SQLNCLI11.1;Data Source=CO1MSFTSQLHKT02;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=IISDW</ConnectionString>
<Timeout>PT0S</Timeout>-->
</DataSource>
<DataSourceView xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\" xmlns:dwd=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0\" dwd:design-time-name=\"b0b61205-c64d-4e34-afae-6d4d48b93fb3\" xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">
<ID>IISDW</ID>
<Name>IISDW</Name>
<DataSourceID>IISDW</DataSourceID>
<Schema> <xs:schema id=\"IISDW_x0020_1\" xmlns=\"\" xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:msdata=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata\" xmlns:msprop=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msprop\">
<xs:element name=\"IISDW_x0020_1\" msdata:IsDataSet=\"true\" msdata:UseCurrentLocale=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"72037318-e316-469d-9a45-a10c77709b39\">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice minOccurs=\"0\" maxOccurs=\"unbounded\">
<xs:element name=\"Application\" msprop:design-time-name=\"7f579e7e-e8b7-4a9d-8a93-a255fccbbfbe\" msprop:IsLogical=\"True\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Application\" msprop:DbTableName=\"Application\" msprop:TableType=\"View\" msprop:Description=\"\" msprop:QueryDefinition=\"SELECT a.Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0) AS [Timestamp], a.ServerName, CAST(a.ServerName AS char(3)) AS DataCenter, a.CS_URI_Stem, CAST(HashBytes(''MD5'', 
 a.Application + a.ServerName + a.CS_URI_Stem + CAST(DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0) AS varchar(24))) AS uniqueidentifier) AS Server_URI_Identity
FROM IIS_6_OLD AS a LEFT OUTER JOIN
 Dimension_Pointer AS b ON a.Application = b.Application
WHERE (b.ProcessedFlag = 0) AND (a.Application IN ("+(DT_WSTR,100) @[User::strDistinctApplication]+"))
GROUP BY a.Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0), a.ServerName, a.CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:QueryBuilder=\"SpecificQueryBuilder\">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name=\"Application\" msprop:design-time-name=\"f3074e98-4a82-4bc5-a818-916203f7758b\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Application\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Application\" minOccurs=\"0\">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">
<xs:maxLength value=\"255\" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"Timestamp\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"2662e3a8-8b1a-4d77-aecb-575329b84dc1\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Timestamp\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Timestamp\" type=\"xs:dateTime\" />
<xs:element name=\"ServerName\" msprop:design-time-name=\"ced26d49-cd6e-4073-a40c-ff5ef70e4ef1\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"ServerName\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"ServerName\" minOccurs=\"0\">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">
<xs:maxLength value=\"255\" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"DataCenter\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"4583e15a-dcf1-45a2-a30b-bd142ca8b778\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"DataCenter\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"DataCenter\" minOccurs=\"0\">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">
<xs:maxLength value=\"3\" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:design-time-name=\"10db5a79-8d50-49d2-9376-a3b4d19864b9\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"CS_URI_Stem\" minOccurs=\"0\">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">
<xs:maxLength value=\"4000\" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name=\"Server_URI_Identity\" msdata:DataType=\"System.Guid, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"018ede0a-e15e-47c2-851b-f4431e8c839c\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Server_URI_Identity\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Server_URI_Identity\" type=\"xs:string\" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:unique name=\"Constraint1\" msprop:IsLogical=\"True\" msdata:PrimaryKey=\"true\">
<xs:selector xpath=\".//Application\" />
<xs:field xpath=\"Server_URI_Identity\" />
<xs:field xpath=\"Timestamp\" />
</xs:unique>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
<IISDW_x0020_1 xmlns=\"\" />
</Schema>
</DataSourceView>
<WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
</Process>
</Parallel>
</Batch>' as XMLAScript_ProcessData"
The Result in the SCRIPT Task does show me the correct XMLA code but when it passes to the "PROCESSADD" Analysis Execute DDL task it fails.
And for validation I have included a breakpoint at the ANALYSIS Service Execute DDl Task (Process ADD) and When I see the value of the variable, I see it as
<Batch xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">\n\t<ErrorConfiguration xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\">\n\t\t<KeyNotFound>IgnoreError</KeyNotFound>\n\t</ErrorConfiguration>\n\t<Parallel>\n <Process xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\">\n <Object> <DatabaseID>IIS_Version2</DatabaseID> <DimensionID>Application</DimensionID>\n </Object>\n <Type>ProcessAdd</Type>\n\t \t<DataSource xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\" xmlns:dwd=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0\" xsi:type=\"RelationalDataSource\" dwd:design-time-name=\"1a3cb292-9bce-4c59-a182-177d6b3506ff\" xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">\n\t\t\t<ID>IISDW</ID>\n\t\t\t<Name>IISDW</Name>\n\t\t\t<ConnectionString>Provider=SQLNCLI11.1;Data Source=CO1MSFTSQLHKT02;Integrated Security=SSPI;Initial Catalog=IISDW</ConnectionString>\n\t\t\t<Timeout>PT0S</Timeout>-->\n\t\t</DataSource>\n\t\t<DataSourceView xmlns:xsd=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\" xmlns:ddl2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2\" xmlns:ddl2_2=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2\" xmlns:ddl100_100=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100\" xmlns:ddl200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200\" xmlns:ddl200_200=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200\" xmlns:ddl300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300\" xmlns:ddl300_300=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2011/engine/300/300\" xmlns:ddl400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400\" xmlns:ddl400_400=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2012/engine/400/400\" xmlns:dwd=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/DataWarehouse/Designer/1.0\" dwd:design-time-name=\"b0b61205-c64d-4e34-afae-6d4d48b93fb3\" xmlns=\"http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine\">\n\t\t\t<ID>IISDW</ID>\n\t\t\t<Name>IISDW</Name>\n\t\t\t<DataSourceID>IISDW</DataSourceID>\n\t\t\t <Schema> <xs:schema id=\"IISDW_x0020_1\" xmlns=\"\" xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:msdata=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msdata\" xmlns:msprop=\"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:xml-msprop\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"IISDW_x0020_1\" msdata:IsDataSet=\"true\" msdata:UseCurrentLocale=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"72037318-e316-469d-9a45-a10c77709b39\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:complexType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:choice minOccurs=\"0\" maxOccurs=\"unbounded\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:element name=\"Application\" msprop:design-time-name=\"7f579e7e-e8b7-4a9d-8a93-a255fccbbfbe\" msprop:IsLogical=\"True\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Application\" msprop:DbTableName=\"Application\" msprop:TableType=\"View\" msprop:Description=\"\" msprop:QueryDefinition=\"SELECT a.Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0) AS [Timestamp], a.ServerName, CAST(a.ServerName AS char(3)) AS DataCenter, a.CS_URI_Stem, CAST(HashBytes('MD5', 
 a.Application + a.ServerName + a.CS_URI_Stem + CAST(DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0) AS varchar(24))) AS uniqueidentifier) AS Server_URI_Identity
FROM IIS_6_OLD AS a LEFT OUTER JOIN
 Dimension_Pointer AS b ON a.Application = b.Application
WHERE (b.ProcessedFlag = 0) AND (a.Application IN (search))
GROUP BY a.Application, DATEADD([hour], DATEDIFF([hour], 0, a.[Timestamp]), 0), a.ServerName, a.CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:QueryBuilder=\"SpecificQueryBuilder\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:complexType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:sequence>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"Application\" msprop:design-time-name=\"f3074e98-4a82-4bc5-a818-916203f7758b\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Application\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Application\" minOccurs=\"0\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:maxLength value=\"255\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:restriction>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:element>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"Timestamp\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"2662e3a8-8b1a-4d77-aecb-575329b84dc1\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Timestamp\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Timestamp\" type=\"xs:dateTime\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"ServerName\" msprop:design-time-name=\"ced26d49-cd6e-4073-a40c-ff5ef70e4ef1\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"ServerName\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"ServerName\" minOccurs=\"0\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:maxLength value=\"255\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:restriction>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:element>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"DataCenter\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"4583e15a-dcf1-45a2-a30b-bd142ca8b778\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"DataCenter\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"DataCenter\" minOccurs=\"0\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:maxLength value=\"3\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:restriction>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:element>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:design-time-name=\"10db5a79-8d50-49d2-9376-a3b4d19864b9\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"CS_URI_Stem\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"CS_URI_Stem\" minOccurs=\"0\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:restriction base=\"xs:string\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<xs:maxLength value=\"4000\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:restriction>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:simpleType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:element>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <xs:element name=\"Server_URI_Identity\" msdata:DataType=\"System.Guid, mscorlib, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089\" msdata:ReadOnly=\"true\" msprop:design-time-name=\"018ede0a-e15e-47c2-851b-f4431e8c839c\" msprop:DbColumnName=\"Server_URI_Identity\" msprop:FriendlyName=\"Server_URI_Identity\" type=\"xs:string\" />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:sequence>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t </xs:complexType>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t</xs:element>\n </xs:choice>\n </xs:complexType>\n <xs:unique name=\"Constraint1\" msprop:IsLogical=\"True\" msdata:PrimaryKey=\"true\">\n <xs:selector xpath=\".//Application\" />\n <xs:field xpath=\"Server_URI_Identity\" />\n <xs:field xpath=\"Timestamp\" />\n </xs:unique>\n </xs:element>\n </xs:schema>\n <IISDW_x0020_1 xmlns=\"\" />\n </Schema>\n\t\t</DataSourceView>\n\t <WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>\n </Process>\n </Parallel>\n</Batch>
Here is the error message I get:
[Analysis Services Execute DDL Task] Error: The -->
text node at line 21, column 3 cannot appear inside the DataSource element (namespace http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine) under Envelope/Body/Execute/Command/Batch/Parallel/Process.
This element can only have text nodes containing white-space characters.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have a table of calculated values in Numbers, and I want to disallow negative numbers in the entire table. Any numbers that would be negative I would like changed to/displayed as zeroes, that way future calculations that may be based on this cell u
-
Hello. I have just joined this community and would be grateful for advice on editing my name submitted to the iBookstore by Blurb on one of my books. I would like to have both of my books with the same author's name. Is it possible? Thank you.
-
Why doesn't my imac like my fonts?
I am a graphic designer and as of late, using Adobe Indesign is a massive headache. It is almost totally unresponsive. Other programs freeze and have the spinning beachball too. It is impossible to work effectively. My programs freeze every couple of
-
Hi All, user is trying to give the VAT ID for a spain customer as ESJ41725920 and the sytem says the VAT registration number is invalid. When i check the same in T.Code Oy17, the length of the VAT registration number is 11 and checking rule is 3 and
-
I sent a PDF by iMessage yesterday. The message went but iMessage froze, then the whole Mac froze (the spinning wheel), needing a cold restart. Does this mean that I should never send PDF's by iMessage?