Evaluation of xi system

I want to know some konwledge about evaluation of xi system ,could you tell me where could I find the information about these? thank you.

You might also find this read interesting ->
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/loginMembersOnly/1,289498,sid21_gci1114827,00.html?NextURL=http%3A//searchsap.techtarget.com/ateQuestionNResponse/0%2C289625%2Csid21_gci1114827_tax293481%2C00.html

Similar Messages

Where to get the evaluation license of system ID NW4

hi,
I have installed successfully the SAP Netweaver 04 Testdrive SR1 (wen application server 6.4). I am searching the evaluated license key at the SAP website.
I checked this one..........
http://www.sap.com/minisap
but here no entry for the SAP system ID "NW4"
pls do let me know from where i will be receiving the same.
Abhishek

oha no...........
Earlier i install the NW1 now NW4. I can not go for N4S, as i think this is for 64 bit system or for IBM DB2. I just have 32 bit and SUSE installed.
every thing was ok with installation of NW4, but when i am trying to connect with the SAPGUI, I got the ABAP run time error message rather than the login window. it is like that.........
========================================================
ABAP Runtime Errors          1
Runtime Errors      DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_REQUEST
Occurred on             2009/03/30
invalid call of database interface.
What happened?
The current ABAP/4 program terminated due to
an internal error in the database interface.
Error analysis
In a statement an invalid request was made to the database interface
when accessing table "DOKTL ".
Last error
logged in SAP kernel
Component............ "NI (network interface)"
Place................ "SAP-Server localhost_NW4_00 on host localhost (wp 0)"
Version.............. 37
Error code........... "-16"
Error text........... "verify own hostname (localhost) failed"
Description.......... "NiIMyAdrVerify"
System call.......... " "
Module............... "nixxi.cpp"
Line................. 3112
The error reported by the operating system is:
Error number..... " "
Error text....... " "
Trigger Location of Runtime Error:
Program Name           SAPMSYST
Include                SAPMSYST
Row                   2,529
Module type           (FORM)
Module Name          FILL_INFO_TAB
===================================================================
is all this error due to the license expired?
Abhishek

Business Process Management Tool Evaluation ARIS or Systems Architect?

Hi Group
I have joined this community yesterday, so I am pretty much new here.
I work as a Business Process Analyst for a semi govt company. I have been tasked for evaluating a tool for business process management.
Current scenario is as under:
1) We are using Microsoft visio as a mapping software
2) BPMN standards for process modelling
3) The design phase of our new ERP software will be starting soon.
4) My company has got vision to become BPM company over the years, we are at very early stage of it.
The questions I have are,
1) Is it worth getting ARIS or System Architect at this stage only for modelling. If now what are the justifications?
2) Based on your experience what are the steps involved in evaluating such tools
3) How hard is it to import those visio drawings into ARIS or System Architect
Your response is much appreciated
Thanks
Hemal

Hi,
My view (I work as an Enterprise Architect for a very large Resources Company).
Visio is a drawing tool. It produces nice diagrams and drawings which have no real connection with the process objects, or system objects they represent. typically an organisation ends up with 1,000's of these e diagrams which end up all having to be maintained (and usually are not) so quickly end up being largely out of date and useless.
Tools like ARIS and other BPM tools, are purpose built Modelling tools. The Process Models built, and each and every object they are composed of are stored in a single, searchable and reportable object oriented database. Each object (if the tool is implemented correctly) has exactly 1 original keyed by a Globally unique Identifier. Other occurrences or copies of that object can be created that are used in multiple places, in multiple processes. Hence maintenance should be easier. If a change is required to the object, change it in one place only, and its automatically also updated in all the other object copies or occurrences. try that with Visio.
Further, if the models are created using the required and correct notation (for example BPMN or BPEL, then they may be exported into or integrated into application or execution layers that support these notations. Usually this is a part automatic, and part manual process. Hence the BPM models are living representations (not 100% but at least some %) of the running code or processes in your systems.
Eventually the nirvana will be when this model to execution paradigm is 100% automated, for 100% of business processes, across any platform or system architecture required. A good dream eh!
The proviso is that all this is designed, built and governed correctly. Like most things, the idea can be good, but the execution bad.
There are several examples of BPM Modelling tools that are available as free downloads. Savvion, Tibco and Intallio are 3 that come to mind that do this. Perhaps try one or more?
ARIS has the advantage that it is more integrated with SAP than any of the others.
The other think that has influenced us toward ARIS is that SAP now use it internally (so I am told) to define and govern the services that end up in their products. the Process is called PIC (Process Integration Content).
There is a separate thread on it Do SAP Plan to Productise the PIC Internal Process for Customers & ISV's?.
Hope this helps.
Phil G.
Message was edited by:
Phil Gleadhill

Survey: Performance Evaluation of ERP-Systems

Hello,
In course of my Bachelor thesis I´m conducting a survey about u201EPerformance evaluation of ERP-Systemsu201D. I would like to ask you to take part in this survey; it will take you only about 10 minutes. The link below will lead you to the survey, which is available in German language only.
http://erp-performance-umfrage.qpk.info
Thank you very much for your time!
Veronika Schreiber (Student at Technische Universität München)

you need to look at the landscape the current system is in.
How many systems are required for the full end to end processes?
User friendly?
What can SAP do that the other systems cant?
Will these things/ processes add value to the business i.e. MSS/ ESS, SRM, FSCM
How much manual work is required for month end?
SAP it can be automated, and the key month end closing should be able to be reduced.
Hope this gives you some ideas of what else to consider.
Please award points if this is useful.

Here's what to consider when evaluating cloud phone systems-

Looking to update your team's business communications strategy? Join us for a webinar to learn how Switch can become part of your company's forward thinking technology plan.The 45-minute sessions will cover:an overview of the Switch features, functionality, and integrations across mobile devicesa look at how your company's Switch account can be easily set up and managed as you scalea live demo of the Switch Chrome desktop AppQ & AThe webinar is held weekly on Wednesdays @ 1:30pm-2:15pm PST.Register here to join us!
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Unfortunately, not an answer... but wanted to chime in that I could have written this! Because I have had the exact same experiences over and over and over with Adobe. "Indifference" is definitely the right term. Been promised so many times that someone will call me back and no one EVER does. I've had maybe 2 very good phone support experiences out of maybe 20 awful ones. Phone tells you to go to chat... chat tells you to go to forums... and forums have never once answered my questions even when they told me they would have an expert review my post and answer it. I have so much wasted time invested with Adobe. Now, my account is cancelled due to non payment. My fault, been a rough couple of months. Well, there was no obvious place to post payment to "continue" my subscription. So I get on chat, and they send me a link to the payment portal. I enter my info and I get "Sorry, we're experiencing technical issues. Please check back soon." I tell chat this and they tell me to check back later, that all their tools are down. I asked when, and of course they don't know. Always the same. This was just tonight. 2 hours later.. still can't pay my account.
I've written to management with direct contact info to a particular manager. Never heard a word back. I dream of the day when someone launches a design suite like adobe's or better... but also with awesome customer support. I will be so gone Adobe.. and won't ever look back.. won't miss you in the least.
I was also a victim of the big Adobe hack a while back and my info was compromised. Think anyone offered me even a month free? Pshaw... right!

Password for the System Center 2012 R2 Orchestrator Evaluation VHD

I recently downloaded the Evaluation VHD for System Center 2012 R2 Orchestrator. After performing the initial setup, I am unable to log in with the credentials that i had provided initially for the Administrator. I faced a similar situation while working
with Evaluation VHD for System Center 2012 R2 App Controller. In that case, after some searches I found 'R2Preview!' as its default password. I have already tried other passwords - P@ssword1, P@ssword, p@ssword1, password1, blank password.
I hope someone can help me with this !

Sorry,
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=39297:"For the
password type pass@word1"
www.sc-orchestrator.eu ,
Blog sc-orchestrator.eu

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

System role change in Sol Man

Dear friends,
I am working with Solution Manger 4.0. In Solar01, in top menu option, under "Business Blueprint", we are having option to change the "System role".
I wants to restrict this option based on the user ID. Because, now everybody logins to different systems (means DEV,QA,PRD) by changing the system role.
How to restrict this option?
Thanks
Senthil

Hello Sentil,
The functionality you are looking for is not available.
However, you may consider the following to achieve a similar result:
In SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN of the respective project, tab System Landscape, sub tab Systems there is a button calls System Landscape Assignment via which you can project specifically hide certain system roles. So for instance if during business blueprinting you only need the evaluation and development systems, you can hide the system roles which are not required at that point of time, such as QA and PRD. The result: Project team members working on SOLAR01 and SOLAR02 for instance can only see the roles which have been defined in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN.
At a later project stage you can then add QA and PRD if required simply by adding the respective system roles again. The information on system-clients assigned is simply retrieved from the system landscape maintenance (SMSY transaction), where this information still resides.
So this might be an alternative to your suggestion (system roles based on user ID) because in this way you have control of offering system roles and, thus, the respective systems project-phase-dependently.
Best regards,
Doreen

Display Evaluations - Urgent

Hi Everyone,
We are having problems in displaying the evaluations(F.30) in our QA system ( SAP 471 vers ), however the information is available in DEV system. When tcode F.30 is executedin QA we get the message that the evaluations are not available and when we go thro' the help Systems suggests on line help to configure the evaluations,
The error is still there after configuring the Evaluations in the system?, where do I check whether the Evaluations have been generated or not, is there any table which is storing the Evaluation types?, Is there any oss note avaible to take care of this, any input on this would be useful.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds,

If you are looking for the Job Evaluation Results table the table is HRP1050.If this is not what you need and want to look for an OSS note try transaction OSS1.
Cheers
Nishanth

SAP HCM- Evaluation Path

Hi,
under the organisation management evaluation path, the system has specified the path as : O-S-P whereby its from organisational unit to position.
In the entry profile for employee selection, the evaluation path the system uses was O-S-P, the problem is when I tries to search for it, the evaluation path for o-p cant be search.
What should I configure to make the O-S-P defined under organisation management to appear in entry profile-employee selection?
Thks:)
Edited by: YanYu Z on Jun 28, 2010 11:41 PM

Thks.
For shift planning-Entry profile is there a need for us to define the evaluation path? The evaluation path like O-S-P like for example under the:
Retail Department (Org unit)
Eng Department(Org unit)
   Sales Assistant(Position)
     Yanyu(Person)
     Jenny(Person)
     Miki(Person)
Is this path like how we get our employee for shift planning?
Thks:)

Linux Operating System - Suitability for SAP

Dear All,
We are evaluating the Linux system for installation of SAP ECC60 , EP and BIW . Please let us know that how the Linux is better than any other OS system i.e. HP-UX, AIX, Solaries etc
Please reply...
Regards
Vimal

I am not an expert but a few chaps here are and love the thing. From my perspective using it it is a very easy thing to use with a lot of possible features due to its open source roots. If you don't like a tool then just find a better one.
Also I am a bit of a memory geek and I do like the way that Linux swaps are very easy to understand, in fact swaps are exactly what they should be, they do not include I/O or all memory is not mapped there to start with and so Linux is eally simple to understand.
As I said I'm not an expert but I am a Basis person of 14 years who finds it very easy to use. You can argue though that you get used to any OS but as some idea, we recommend Linux as the platform of choice now.

Vendor evaluation score calculations.

Hi Guys,
I urgently need your assitance here.
May someone explain to me how the how the system calculates the scores for the automatic criteria "Quality" and "Service"
I understand the score calculation for criteria "Delivery" - the system looks at the delivery date on the PO v/s the GR date as well as the quantity on the PO v/s quantity on at GR.
please assist.
thaks

u2022Quality - Scoring method 7
- Calculated with the information of the quality notification.
- Each time a GR is posted for quality inspection a score should be introduced manually for this audit lot.
- First system computes a score for the lots that were inspected.
- If there is a GR without inspection it will receive the maximum score.
- Then system compares the number of GR for the period (table S012 field ALIEF) against the information from the quality notification.
Automatic EvaluationShop floor Complaint
u2022Shop Floor Complaint - Scoring method 8
- From the on-line documentation:"During the vendor evaluation process, the system checks whether the costs associated with the faulty delivery exceed the maximum percentage of business volume defined in the Customizing system."
- The "cost associated" are based on the information from Quality Notification (transaction QM03). This information is saved on table QMEL.
- The "business volume" is determined by the invoice value for the period defined on the purchasing org. vendor evaluation customizing: T147-STAGE.
- The sums of invoice's values are taken from table S012 for the period.
- Check if the USER-EXIT is not active.
- Check if there are invoices for the period.
Automatic EvaluationQuality Audit
u2022Quality Audit - Scoring method 9
- Based on the information of Quality Management.
- The scores for an Audit lot are introduced in the Quality Management system.
- When an evaluation is carried out system check the parameter Quality audit in customizing.
- If the indicator is set, the system calculates the average score for all the quality audits in the validity period.
- The result is the vendor's score for the quality audit.
- If the indicator is not set, only the most recent audit lot is included. This then represents the vendor's score for the sub-criteria
- Check if the USER-EXIT is active.
For services
u2022 The scores for semiautomatic criteria come from informastion entered in the service entry sheet (for an externally performed service).
u2022
When you define a scoring method "C" - Determination from quality ratingor "D" - Determination from timeliness rating of service then you can enter a manually score in the Entry Sheet under Vendor Evaluation

SQL Expressions in RAD -Getting error during runtime while generating rpt

Hi
We have just migrated from WSAD to RAD Version: 7.0.0.7.
The issue is: I am getting the error at the runtime when I am trying to use the SQL expression in my one of the report. The SQL Expression feature is not supported by this version of RAD. I checked the Help contents. It says
Field Objects: SQL expression fields
This report contains SQL Expression fields. These fields are not visible in this version of the Crystal Reports designer, but they will be evaluated by the system when the report is executed. New SQL Expression fields cannot be created by the designer. SQL Expression fields will remain in the .rpt file after saving and can be edited by other Crystal Reports designers
To me it seems you can use the 'SQL Expressions' in the report using some Crystal Reports designers and at the runtime it will be evaluated. So I edited my report with some Crystal Reports Designer and tested it on WSAD. It worked fine. Now since we have migrated to RAD, this is an issue since I am getting the following error:
ERROR [WebContainer : 0] com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.formatter.objectformatter - com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.be: Failed to parse expression.
[12/17/08 15:12:14:750 EST] 0000001c SystemOut     O 15:12:14,671 ERROR [WebContainer : 0] com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter - Failed to export report
com.crystaldecisions.reports.exportinterface.exceptions.ExportException: Failed to parse expression.
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.a.c.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.a.c.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.b.b.int(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.request(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.x.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.q.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.dd.a(Unknown Source)
When I remove the expression fields, it works fine on RAD too.
I am using following versions:
RAD Version: 7.0.0.7
Crystal Reports for Rational Application Developer Version: 11.5.6.v20080304.
Crystal Report Runtime Support version is 11.8.4.v1094
Please let me know if somebody has faced the similar issue.
Any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Kamal

Hi
We have just migrated from WSAD to RAD Version: 7.0.0.7.
The issue is: I am getting the error at the runtime when I am trying to use the SQL expression in my one of the report. The SQL Expression feature is not supported by this version of RAD. I checked the Help contents. It says
Field Objects: SQL expression fields
This report contains SQL Expression fields. These fields are not visible in this version of the Crystal Reports designer, but they will be evaluated by the system when the report is executed. New SQL Expression fields cannot be created by the designer. SQL Expression fields will remain in the .rpt file after saving and can be edited by other Crystal Reports designers
To me it seems you can use the 'SQL Expressions' in the report using some Crystal Reports designers and at the runtime it will be evaluated. So I edited my report with some Crystal Reports Designer and tested it on WSAD. It worked fine. Now since we have migrated to RAD, this is an issue since I am getting the following error:
ERROR [WebContainer : 0] com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.formatter.objectformatter - com.crystaldecisions.reports.dataengine.be: Failed to parse expression.
[12/17/08 15:12:14:750 EST] 0000001c SystemOut     O 15:12:14,671 ERROR [WebContainer : 0] com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter - Failed to export report
com.crystaldecisions.reports.exportinterface.exceptions.ExportException: Failed to parse expression.
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.a.c.if(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.reports.formatter.a.c.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.b.b.int(Unknown Source)
     at com.businessobjects.reports.sdk.JRCCommunicationAdapter.request(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.x.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.proxy.remoteagent.q.a(Unknown Source)
     at com.crystaldecisions.sdk.occa.report.application.dd.a(Unknown Source)
When I remove the expression fields, it works fine on RAD too.
I am using following versions:
RAD Version: 7.0.0.7
Crystal Reports for Rational Application Developer Version: 11.5.6.v20080304.
Crystal Report Runtime Support version is 11.8.4.v1094
Please let me know if somebody has faced the similar issue.
Any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Kamal

Questions on masterdata

Deat aspects,
Recently i have been to ibm interview. I have few doubts to clarify
1.what are the different types of masterdata records?
2.In credit mgnt dynamin credit check we mention horizon period(for eg.40 days) how system knows dis is the starting date this is the ending date?
3.Invoice split & delivery split criteria
4.What is work list? How to create worklist?

Dear Vidya,
1. Types Of Master Records
Customer material info record
Customer master
Material master
Output Record
Price Record
Incompletion Log
2. If you specify a horizon of 40 T (DAYS), while evaluating credit, the system ignores all open orders that are due for delivery beyond the 40 days horizon you specified.
3. Invoice Split Criteria:
Payer
Terms Of Payment
Billing Date
Delivery Split Criteria:
Shipping Point
Ship To
Delivery date
Route
Incoterms
4. Work list u2013 It is used for collective processing in SD process like delivery, picking PGI and billing.
Best Regards,
Chandramohan

Runtime Error - DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL - Too many OPEN CURSOR

When I try to train a Decision Tree Model via an APD process in RSANWB, I get a runtime error when my model is configured with too many parameter fields or too many leaves (with 2 leaves it works, with more it fails).
By searching SAP Notes I see that there are many references to this kind of runtime errors. But no note on occurences of it in RSANWB / RSDMWB .
Any information on this anyone?
Claudio Ciardelli
Runtime Errors DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_RSQL
Date and Time 29.07.2005 16:19:21
|ShrtText |
| Error in RSQL module of database interface. |
|What happened? |
| Error in ABAP application program. |
| |
| The current ABAP program "SAPLRS_DME_DECISION_TREE_PRED" had to be terminated |
| because one of the |
| statements could not be executed. |
| |
| This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program. |
| |
|Error analysis |
| The system attempted to open a cursor for a SELECT or OPEN CURSOR |
| statement but all 16 cursors were already in use. |
| The statement that failed accesses table "/BIC/0CDT000030 ". |
| The erroneous statement accesses table "/BIC/0CDT000030 ". |
|Trigger Location of Runtime Error |
| Program SAPLRS_DME_DECISION_TREE_PRED |
| Include LRS_DME_DECISION_TREE_PREDU06 |
| Row 103 |
| Module type (FUNCTION) |
| Module Name RS_DME_DTP_EVALUATE |
|Source Code Extract |
|Line |SourceCde |
| 73|* Prepare for Data evaluation |
| 74| CATCH SYSTEM-EXCEPTIONS OTHERS = 15. |
| 75| CREATE DATA ref TYPE (i_enum_dbtab). |
| 76| ASSIGN ref->* TO <fs_wkarea>. |
| 77| ASSIGN COMPONENT gv_class_dbposit OF STRUCTURE |
| 78| <fs_wkarea> TO <fs_class>. |
| 79| CREATE DATA ref TYPE TABLE OF (i_enum_dbtab). |
| 80| ASSIGN ref->* TO <ft_data>. |
| 81| |
| 82| ENDCATCH. |
| 83| IF sy-subrc = 15. |
| 84|* Error on Assignment. |
| 85| CALL FUNCTION 'RS_DME_COM_ADDMSG_NOLOG' |
| 86| EXPORTING |
| 87| i_type = 'E' |
| 88| i_msgno = 301 |
| 89| i_msgv1 = 'EVALUATION_PHASE' |
| 90| IMPORTING |
| 91| es_return = ls_return. |
| 92| APPEND ls_return TO e_t_return. |
| 93| EXIT. |
| 94| ENDIF. |
| 95| |
| 96|* For the un-trained Rec-Ids, evaluate..... |
| 97| REFRESH lt_recinp. |
| 98| APPEND LINES OF i_t_records TO lt_recinp. |
| 99| SORT lt_recinp . |
| 100|* Open Cursor.. |
| 101| DATA: l_curs TYPE cursor. |
| 102| DATA: l_psize TYPE i VALUE 10000. |
|>>>>>| OPEN CURSOR WITH HOLD l_curs FOR |
| 104| SELECT * FROM (i_enum_dbtab) |
| 105| WHERE rsdmdt_recid NOT IN |
| 106| ( SELECT rsdmdt_recid FROM |
| 107| (i_learn_tab) ). |
| 108| |
| 109|* Start Fetch... |
| 110| DO. |
| 111| FETCH NEXT CURSOR l_curs |
| 112| INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <ft_data> |
| 113| PACKAGE SIZE l_psize. |
| 114| IF sy-subrc NE space. |
| 115| EXIT. |
| 116| ENDIF. |
| 117| |
| 118|* Process records... |
| 119| LOOP AT <ft_data> ASSIGNING <fs_wkarea>. |
| 120| |
| 121|* Call Prediction Function. |
| 122| CALL FUNCTION 'RS_DME_DTP_PREDICT_STRUCTURE' |

Hi Claudio,
well the message is very clear and I think in your case you need to split your model into a few somehow equal models, each not having more than 2 leaves.
Another option might be to do more things serially instead of parallel.
Hope it helps
regards
Siggi

Evaluation of xi system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for