Evaluation path for MSS role

Hi all,
Is there a way to assign MSS role dynamically to an employee if he has employees reporting to him?
We have got to know that this can be achieved by configuring some evaluation path.
Any pointers would be appreciated!
TIA!

Diana,
Where actually do you assign the roles ,is it in the portal or you have a CUA system where all the role maintenance is done over there.if second one is true you can write a custom program and assign the role by checking the direct reportees
Thanks
Bala Duvvuri

Similar Messages

  • Evaluation path for B002 - OOAW

    Hi
    I'm creating a evaluation path for fetching all reports under a line manager. Can someone please throw light on how to configure thie in OOAW. It works fine SAP_MANG, I tried to modify but iam not able to get this.
    - Aravind

    Hi,
    B002 is normally used as an O-O relationship.  If you look at evaluation path O-S-P in OOAW.  You will see how it is used here.
    O-S-P might actually meet your requirement.
    let me know.
    thanks.
    JB

  • Help to evaluation path for ESS

    Hi
    I have to make a report/list in the portal, where an employee can see i.e. the birthday of all the colleagues directly under the employees manager.
    Is there a standard evaluation path for this ? Or can someone point me in the right direction (and remember I am new to evaluation paths)
    Thanks
    /Jakob

    Hi Siddharth 
    Thank you for your reply.
    I have created the evaluation path as you described, but when I test it using PPSS, with the following data :
                                                                                    Objekttype           P   Person                                               
    ObjektID             00032422      ib                                         
    Betegnelse           ib, ibsen                                                                               
    Evalueringsvej       Z_ess_co  Test af at finde hvilke objekter der er løn på t
                                                                                    Behandlingsperiode   28.09.2008  til  31.12.9999                                                                               
    Where the person "00032422" is part of an organization with several employees. I was expecting a list of employees directly under the manager of employee "00032422".
    Anything I have misunderstood or done wrong?
    Thanks
    /Jakob

  • MSS Team View evaluation path for non chief positions (s-s)

    Hello,
    We have a problem with display of employees under non chief manager - reporting managers (connection A002). In our organization we have line managers and under them team managers who are leading team of employees. Those managers want to see their employees under MSS Team View iView.
    I have checked forum posts and try to create correct evaluation path but i didn't get results yet. I have created 2 evaluation paths:
    Z_MANG (copy of SAP_MANG):
    10 *     B 008      S
    20 S    B 002      S
    30 US  A 208 P
    Z_S-S (copy of MSSDIREC):
    10 S  A 002     S
    20 S  A 008     P
    30 S  A 008     US
    I also included them into rules so:
    Root rule (rule 1) - Z_MANG
    Target rule (rule 3) - Z_S-S
    I have also done customizing under Object and Data provider and if I choose standard evaluation paths (e.g. SAP_MANG and MSSDIREC), I get employees shown - if I give manager a hat (A012 connection).
    Could you please help me with advice, where am I wrong? I think that first evaluation path (Z_MANG) is ok and it finds non chief manager, maybe is a problem with second one that don't show employees?
    Thank you for answers in advance.
    Best regards,
    David

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation path for team calender in MSS

    Hi Experts,
    I need to configure an evaluation path as follows.
    1.  A manager  M1 belongs to org unit O1. He manages Org unit O2.
    2.  Org unit O2 reports to O1. similarly O3 also reports to O1.
    3.  Now I need to develop a evaluation path in which, M1 should have visibility to all employees from both O2 and O3 in his MSS..
    I have tried out many combinations with A002 and B002 relationships. but it not working.
    So could you help me to build this evaluation path.
    Thanks
    Sameer

    there are standard evaluation paths available which should fulfil thsi requirement
    Check SAP_MANG
    SBESX
    MSSDIREC
    You can use report report RHSTRU00, to check your own path

  • Evaluation paths in MSS

    Hi
    Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
    Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
    We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
    Any thoughts would be helpful.
    -JT

    Hello Raj,
    you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
    To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
    The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
    - AUTHC: R
    - INFTY: 0001
    - PERSA: *
    - PERSG: *
    - PERSK: *
    - SUBTY: *
    - VDSK1: *
    If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
    T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    - Planversion: 01 (most likely)
    - Object Type: O
    - Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you  need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
    - Status Vector: 12
    - Depth: 0
    - Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
    Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
    Thats it
    regards
    Markus

  • Evaluation Path for Appraisal docs

    Hi  Friends-    
    These  FMs  using  such  Evaluation Paths  creating  Appraisal docs  for  Given ' Org Unit '   'O'
    1) HRHAP_DOCUMENT_PREP_ORG                      using   'BOSSORG' ,
    2) HRHAP_PREP_READ_ORG_STRUCTURE         using   'HAP_ORG',
    3) STRUCTURE_BUILD_MULTIPLE_ROOTS          using the same 'HAP_ORG'
    What  Evaluation Path i shd  pass in these FMs   to  create Appraisal docs  for  Given  Employees ' Perner'   ?
    These all FM  used in one standard Report  RHXHAP_APP_DOC_PREPARE    which i need to copy and enhance for pernr also ...
    Or is there  Standard FMs  are there which creates  Appraisal docs based on Employees 'P' ?
    Pls share your inputs on this.
    Regards
    Meeta

    ok

  • Evaluation Path for Position to Position Reporting Structure

    Hello Everyone,
    We currently have a position to position reporting structure in place.  WIth this being said, not every supervisor in our organization is the chief of a team.  I am trying to create an evaluation path that will look at a position, then go up to get the positions report to position (but not go up any further), then go down to get the positions that report to the supervisor.  This will allow us to start with a position, then return all the positions that the report to position has.  In essence this will allow us to start with a position and get the team (though we don't have an org unit for the team).  I am trying to do this for the Team Calendar in ESS. 
    Below is what I have.  The problem is with the depth, if I enter a 2, then it is not getting the lateral positions, but if I enter a 3, then it goes up to another level and gets an additional supervisor (which I do not want).
    S     A     002     Reports (line) to     2     S
    S     B     002     Is line supervisor of     1     S
    S     A     008     Holder     3     P
    Has anyone developed and Evaluation Path that does this (gets a positions team without having an org unit) and can offer assistance?
    Best Regards,
    Scott

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation Paths for Audit Requirements

    Hi,
    For requirements, which belong to the "Subrequirements" requirements category, is "A500" typically the value that one would specify for this?
    Thank you,
    Eric

    Yesterday, I defined the evaluation path as you suggested. I am still seeing problems, so I assume that I must have something misconfigured or unconfigured somewhere else. This implies that I'm probably not done bothering the forum yet....
    As far as getting the "SC" requirement selection into 4.72, it is not much of an issue for me, since we are supposed to be upgrading fairly soon, and for testing purposes, I should be able to use an eval path. I might still post an OSS message, as you suggest.
    One thing that would be nice would be a complete "changelog" to view somewhere. I can see the release notes for my version in the implementation guide, but it would be nice to see the release notes for all versions. This would allow someone to make a quick determination about what became available and when. If such a changelog already exists, can you tell me where to access it?
    Thanks again for your help, Joachim.
    Best,
      Eric

  • Evaluation Path for Direct Reports only

    Hi
    We have written an evaluation path to return direct reports for a given manager (to use in an Adobe Interactive form). We get the correct employees returned, but also the manger himself. Ideally we want a list of names that doesn't include him.
    Here's our path:
    No      Obj      A/B     Rel     Rel name         Priority      Rel Obj Type    Skip
    10       US       B       008     Holder                 *                   S  
    20       P         B       008     Holder                 *                   S
    30       S         A       012     Manages             *                   O
    40       O         B       003     Incorporates        *                   S
    50       S         A       008     Holder                 *                   P      
    What change should we make to not include the manager in the returned set?
    Thanks
    Trish

    Hello,
    Sorry but you can't.
    SAP considers that Manager is not assigned to his own org unit (A012 not equal to A008).
    I had the same issue and i had to create 2 evaluations path :
       - one to get the list of employee (manager include)
       - one to get the manager only
    and exclude the second one in the report.
    Edited by: Cédric LEFRANCOIS on Dec 21, 2009 11:47 AM

  • Evalution path for PFAL to handle concurrent employee asignment.

    Hello,
    While using PFAL to push any object of type 'P'(employee), the standard process is creating IDoc segments only for the given employee, But how is it possible to create IDoc segments for its other assignments also?
    I need to create IDoc segments of all the assignments for the employee given in PFAL selection screen.
    Is there any evalution path (relating to 'CP') could help?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Parthasarathi Mohanty on Jun 1, 2011 1:01 PM

    Hi,
    Thanks,
    A209 evaluation path adds the IDoc segment of the Central Person (CP) related to the 'P'.
    I need the IDoc segments of all the assignments of the P.
    For e.g: The 'P' entered in the selection screen of PFAL has 3 assignments with a single CP.
    I need the IDoc segments to be created for all the 3 assignments. (Segments related to CP not required)

  • Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

    Hi all,
    I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units  which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
    I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
    I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Anna

    Hi Anna,
    You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
    I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
    You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
    But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
    Hope it helps!
    Regards,
    SR

  • Evaluation path for Nakisa

    Hi experts,
    I would like to change the evluation path (wegid in the R3 system) for the Nakisa.
    Example: Currently Nakisa uses some kind of evluation path, but I would like to use another one e.e. "ZM_OSP".
    My question is how can I do this?
    I realized that on the admin screen of Nakisa: Hierarchies -> DataConnection ->  Organization Structure-> Data Connection: there is a BADI called  "BAPI_3_DataSets_O2O"  But I can'T find this BADI in the system
    I also noticed that probably this budi uses the HCM_GET_ORGSTRUCTURE_AS_XML fucntion module toget the org. data, but there is no object  in the  " where used list"  of this FM...
    Please help
    Thanks
    N.G.

    The best way to find the used BAPi is the RFC trace (ST01 trasnaction)

  • Re: Depth of Evaluation for Standard Evaluation Paths (Bottom Up Approach)

    Hi All,
    We are facing a unique issue when using OOSP and defining evaluation path. for e.g. we used the standard SBESX (Staff assignments along Organizational structure). We also defined the following fields to test the Org structure results for a user's structural authorization on what he/she can see (e.g. Org unit(O), Positions(S), Users(P))
    1. Object Type = O
    2. Evalutaion Path = SBESX
    3. Status vector = 12345
    4. Depth (D) = 5 (which defaults to 1 automatically if we set the sign field to -(negative) for Bottom-up approach (displaying org structure bottom to up)
    5. Function Module = RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT
    6. Key Date = D
    The issue we have is for the above settings on OOSP Depth field defaults to 1 everytime we use the Bottom up approach (i.e setting the Sign field to - (negative)). Has anyone encountered the above problem with the depth field? Let us know if you had any fix or you had to escalate this to SAP?
    Best regards,
    -Murali

    S0003562672 wrote:>
    > hi murali,
    >
    > I cannot give you an answer on why exactly the depth filed is defaulting to 1 when using the negative in the sign fields (T77PR-SSIGN).  but can you perhaps explain what you're trying to accomplish with your structural profile.  in that case, maybe I/we can figure out a way to circumvent the use of the sign field...
    >
    > Edited by: Dimitri van Heumen on Mar 19, 2008 2:24 PM
    > (typing errors)
    Thanks for your reply Dimitri.
    Here is what we are trying to acheive with the Org structure below:
                                                                          O - 00001004
                                                                            S - 00000253
                                      O - 00001005                                                O - 00001006
                                           S – 00000251 hradmin1                               S – 00000256 essuser2 (120)
                                           S - 00000252
                   O - 00001007                   O - 00001008                     O - 00001009          O - 00001010
                   S - 00000257                     S - 00000259                     S - 00000260(121)    S - 00000254 (122)
                   S – 00000258  essuser1                                                                            S – 0000255 hradmin2(114)
    Position # 00000255 (far right down below in the above Org structure) is the HR Specialist for (Org #00001006 and Org #00001009).  Employee # 114 (far right bottom) has been hired into this position 255. They should be able to see Employees 120, 121, 122 and themselves(114).
    We have created a structural profile for the user hradmin2(114) and attached him to a role which has ess/mss functionality. We are trying to use the evaluation path SBESX to test what org units, postions and users this user hradmin2(114) can see which should meet the requirement stated above that he should see 120,121,122 and 114 themselves.
    So from the Org structure above it is a bottom up scenerio where hradmin2 must see org units 00001010, 00001009 and 00001006 and whenever we set the sign field to -ve (bottom up approach of displaying org structure) and depth of lets say 4 it automatically defaluts to 1 and when we check hradmin2 authorization profile in oosb we only see org unit 00001010 being displayed and not the org units above it for this bottom up approach.
    Are you aware of any methods to acheive this for the org structure above?
    Thanks
    -Murali
    Edited by: Murali Sripadam on Mar 19, 2008 1:47 PM

  • Direct reportees for MSS

    hello gurus,
    My requirement is when a Manager logs in thru MSS he can only view the direct reportess & their details. Say a Department may have 1 head & 2 Managers. So each manager can view only the direct reportees when he logs in the MSS.
    Currently the reporting display is possible only if i assign A/012 relationship & this wud display all reportees under this dept.
    Reading the threads i assumed changing the evaluation path will help but am confused as how to do it. In SPRO under OADP there are steps to be maintained Eg - Define Rules for Object Selection. When i go to this step which std entry do i copy & wht evaluation path can i use to get the desired result.
    Pls help me.
    rgds,

    Hi siddharth,
    thnk u so much for the reply
    i have already gone thru this link & with its help made the changes.
    My requirement is when a Manager logs in MSS he can only view the direct reportees under him
    currently my observation is that the reporting structure is visible only if the Manager is assigned A/012 relationship. If i remove this relationship then there is no display of reporting structure.
    i copied the standard entries & modified acc to my requirements.
    (A) Object Selection Rule : - Z_MSS_TMV_RULE1 (Evaluation Path - SAP_MANG)
                                                 Z_MSS_TMV_RULE5 (Evaluation Path - MSSDIREC)
    (B) Selection Rule :- ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
                   Rule for Root Object = Z_MSS_TMV_RULE1
                   Rule for Target Object = Z_MSS_TMV_RULE5
    (C) Organizational Structure Views :- ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
                  Obj Sel = ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
                  Grp of Data Views = MSS_TMV_EE
    (D) Group Organisational Structure Views :- Z_MSS_TMV_EE
                  Org Struct View = ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
    I have copied the Std entry MSS_TMV_EE for the above config
    1) Can u suggest what more i need to add to the config to get the desired result
    2) Where & which FUNTION MODULE to use
    3) Which other evaluation path can i use to get the desired output?? (i tried changing the evalution path for Target Object & no data was displayed)
    3) Is is mandatory to assign A 012 relationship to the Manager?? Because i only want direct reportees & if i assign A012 then all the subordinates in the Org Unit will be dispalyed where as i only want direct reportees tobe displayed.
    all help is highly appreciated. Pls help me resolve this
    rgds,

Maybe you are looking for