Evaluation Path in PPSS

Please, i'd like to know how to create an evaluation path but with depth 2, i mean 2-level down... when i create one example i see that it shows the manager and ALL the subordinates. And i need to show the direct subordinates. Where can I manage the depth?????
Please I need your help!!!!

The configuration is:
20     P     B     008     Titular     *     S
30     S     A     012     dirige...     *     O
35     O     B     012     dirigido por...     *     S
40     O     B     003     comprende     *     S
50     S     A     008     Titular     *     P
60     S     B     007     descrito por     *     C
70     O     B     002     es superior directo de     *     O
80     S     B     002     es superior directo de     *     S

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Evaluation Path

    Hi All,
    I had created one Evaluation Path P-P.
    I want to retrieve all employees who are reporting to a particulat employee...
    ex: A is the manager
    B , C, D are team leads.
    Again B is having 2 more employees.. B1,B2...
    So when we execute for employee A all the B,C,D,B1,B2 need to be displayed. and I created the ZTEST ev path..
    code of EV:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S B 005 S  -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P ->  sub-ordinate positions
    and it is succesfully executed in PPSS..
    i HAVE WRITEN A SAMPLE PROGRAM to test that...
    eX:
    GET OBJEC.
    WRITE: OBJEC-OTYPE , OBJEC-OBJID.
    but system is going infinite loop and giving the following error...
    "\FUNCTION-POOL=RHAS\DATA=STRU_VERK[]"
    Let me know whats wrong here.. and more over issue is person to person retrieve is not possible?
    Regards
    Sas

    Hi.
    What's wrong is this:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions
    You are using two opposite links in the same WEGID, so this is what leads to the infinite loop. You should get rid of the first one and always start to evaluate with the current position of the manager.
    S B 005 S -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions

  • HR - Evaluation Path Issue

    Hi ,
    There is a custom FM which is using  std FM   RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' to get back hierarchy of organisation .
    A custom evaluation path has been created and is being used - ZX.
    Now RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' is returning incorrect results. I need to check whether the evaluation path is defined properly. looks like there is an error in definition which might be causing this problem.
    I have no idea how evaluation path works. Could you please let me know the tcode where i could check on the custom evaluation path and rectify the error?
    Thanks in advance

    thanks for the reply.
    I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
    Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

  • Evaluation path in CRM - RH_STRUC_GET not working !!

    Hi all,
    I created a new evaluation path in CRM 4.0 to determine the business partners in an organizational unit.
    If I test it in PPSS it works absolutely perfect, however I have to use it in an ABAP and there I found out that FM RH_STRUC_GET doesn't work (maybe BP is excluded somewhere)
    Is there another FM working in CRM, or do I have to fill some HR table to get this to work, otherwise I have to do it manually by selecting from HRP1001 tables.
    Kind regards, Rob Dielemans

    Sorry,
    It had something to do with buffers.
    RH_STRUC_GET uses buffers and ppss doesn't.
    It now works as planned.
    Kind regards, rob Dielemans

  • PCH LDB issue using Evaluation path

    Hello,
    I have a custom program which uses PCH LDB and runs for positions. The program works fine when I input Position IDs.
    When I run with org.unit + evaluation path (O-O-S), the program runs forever. When I checked in debug the program is creating duplicate entries in the output internal table.
    As per my analysis, this issue is happening only for org.units having positions more than 600. After processing 599 positions, the standard program sets the INDEX  to 0 and resume the processing from 1st position resulting in infinite loop.
    Can anyone please help me out in this?
    Thank you.
    Praveen.

    thanks for the reply.
    I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
    Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

  • Help to evaluation path for ESS

    Hi
    I have to make a report/list in the portal, where an employee can see i.e. the birthday of all the colleagues directly under the employees manager.
    Is there a standard evaluation path for this ? Or can someone point me in the right direction (and remember I am new to evaluation paths)
    Thanks
    /Jakob

    Hi Siddharth 
    Thank you for your reply.
    I have created the evaluation path as you described, but when I test it using PPSS, with the following data :
                                                                                    Objekttype           P   Person                                               
    ObjektID             00032422      ib                                         
    Betegnelse           ib, ibsen                                                                               
    Evalueringsvej       Z_ess_co  Test af at finde hvilke objekter der er løn på t
                                                                                    Behandlingsperiode   28.09.2008  til  31.12.9999                                                                               
    Where the person "00032422" is part of an organization with several employees. I was expecting a list of employees directly under the manager of employee "00032422".
    Anything I have misunderstood or done wrong?
    Thanks
    /Jakob

  • Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG is not working

    Hello Friends,
    I am trying to run the Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG  and it never produces output. If I run the report with any  other Evaluation path,it works......
    Can anybody help me in this issue,
    Thanks
    Kisu

    solved on own.

  • Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.

    Dear All,
    How would i be able to get to know the evaluation path used by organisational structure to display the structure. What i found in tcode : ppome is that it is showing evaluation but not path name. I want to know the reference path name which it is using.
    Thanks,
    Raj

    Hi
    Check the Report:
    RHINFAW0 - Infotype reporting.
    Regards,
    Sreeram

  • Evaluation paths in MSS

    Hi
    Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
    Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
    We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
    Any thoughts would be helpful.
    -JT

    Hello Raj,
    you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
    To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
    The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
    - AUTHC: R
    - INFTY: 0001
    - PERSA: *
    - PERSG: *
    - PERSK: *
    - SUBTY: *
    - VDSK1: *
    If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
    T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    - Planversion: 01 (most likely)
    - Object Type: O
    - Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you  need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
    - Status Vector: 12
    - Depth: 0
    - Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
    Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
    Thats it
    regards
    Markus

  • Error with Recursive Evaluation Path in PD Profile

    Dear Experts,
    I’m facing an issue using a recursive evaluation path inside a PD profile (transaction OOSP). My scenario is that a Central Person (CP) object is linked by 2 Person (P) objects.  I want the PD profile to give access to 2 Person (P) objects as long as I have access to either 1 of the Person (P) object. I have an evaluation path that is created using transaction OOAW as follows:
    10 P     A 209     * CP
    20 CP       B 209     * P
    The problem that I’m encountering is that the P object goes through a recursive loop during the evaluation path, i.e. the 2 P objects that are evaluated as output gets passed in as inputs again and go into a loop continuously. Is there a way to resolve this recursive issue or other alternative resolution that could meet my requirements? Thanks.

    Use field "Function Module" of table T77PR. You can program what you want yourself. Use function module RH_STRUC_GET to get the CP from the P, and then again RH_STRUC_GET to get the P from the CP. Add the resultings P to the output parameter. Press F1 on the field to see how the FB should look like.

  • T-code of the window where it asks for evaluation path.

    Hi,
    I want the T-code of that window where it asks for evaluation path. I want to generate the report in OM

    Hi,
    If you are creating repoert through HIS tool, you can use OODS T code to declare the Evaluation path.
    Tomesh

  • Evaluation path to get personnel number all the org unit and subordinates

    Dear all,
    I have OM issue to ask.This is the scenario:
    Staff A  belong to  org 1. Under Org  1, I  have org unit 1-A, 1-B and org unit 1-C.
    Issue 1 :
    I want to run report(RHSTRU00) to  to generate all the staff number in org 1 (Include 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C).
    Issue 2 :
    I  want to run report for 1-A, only staff belongs in org 1-A appear.The others not appear.
    I was understanding I have to play around with evaluation path. Until now I can't find the suitable evaluation_path. I need your help.tq

    Hi,
    Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel.  The standard report RHXSTRU02 will give you people by Org Unit.  Just enter the Org Unit ID number and you will get the employees as output.
    If you still want to use RHSTRU00, you can use O-P or O-S-P to get the employees and the positions.
    Paul

  • How to create own evaluation path

    Hi Experts
    Can anyone of the HR experts let me know how to create own evaluation path to be used in Function Module 'RH_STRUC_GET'.
    Thanx,
    Rahul

    Hi
    To maintain evaluation paths, choose the IMG activity SAP Web Application Server ® Business Management ® SAP Business Workflow ® Basic Settings (Organizational management) ® Number range maintenance ® Maintain evaluation paths. When the system is in operation, use transaction OOAW .
    Here you will find the maintenance view Change evaluation paths: Overview.
    Assign a name to the evaluation path (maximum of eight alphanumeric characters).
    Go to the dependent view Evaluation paths (individual maintenance).
    Describe the relationship chain to be used for the evaluation.
    To establish the permitted relationships for an object type, use report RHRELAT0 .
    REWARD POINTS

  • MSS Team View evaluation path for non chief positions (s-s)

    Hello,
    We have a problem with display of employees under non chief manager - reporting managers (connection A002). In our organization we have line managers and under them team managers who are leading team of employees. Those managers want to see their employees under MSS Team View iView.
    I have checked forum posts and try to create correct evaluation path but i didn't get results yet. I have created 2 evaluation paths:
    Z_MANG (copy of SAP_MANG):
    10 *     B 008      S
    20 S    B 002      S
    30 US  A 208 P
    Z_S-S (copy of MSSDIREC):
    10 S  A 002     S
    20 S  A 008     P
    30 S  A 008     US
    I also included them into rules so:
    Root rule (rule 1) - Z_MANG
    Target rule (rule 3) - Z_S-S
    I have also done customizing under Object and Data provider and if I choose standard evaluation paths (e.g. SAP_MANG and MSSDIREC), I get employees shown - if I give manager a hat (A012 connection).
    Could you please help me with advice, where am I wrong? I think that first evaluation path (Z_MANG) is ok and it finds non chief manager, maybe is a problem with second one that don't show employees?
    Thank you for answers in advance.
    Best regards,
    David

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

    Hi all,
    I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units  which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
    I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
    I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Anna

    Hi Anna,
    You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
    I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
    You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
    But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
    Hope it helps!
    Regards,
    SR

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use one external hard drive for 3 of my Macs?

    I have a 2007 white MacBook, a 2011 MacBook Pro, and a 2013 MacBook Air. I want to be able to transfer all of my precious family photos off of my MacBook and Macbook Pro onto an external hard drive and then wipe those computers clean, and then I want

  • Sending mail to a large group

    I have a large group in my address book and tried to mail a message to the group - it appears to have crashed it. Is there a limit? Is it about my internet connection?

  • How to integrate WPF NotifyIcon with Caliburn.Micro

    Hi, can anyone help with my question? I've asked 20 days ago... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27588784/how-to-integrate-wpf-notifyicon-with-caliburn-micro Any insights? Take a look at WPF FlashMessage About.me

  • I want to delete the old account

    I want to delete the old account on your iPhone 5 S where I Astraeto of person that I could not remove the old account its own evidence device is IMEI / **** <Edited By Host>

  • Want to Learn XI

    Hi Friends,         I want to learn XI .. Can any one tell me what all pre requisites for that ? I have experience in ABAP and i have knowledge of Java also. Plz help me anybody how to proceed for that?? What softwares required for that ?? And where