Evaluation Path to show ALL
HI,
can someone tell me if there is an evaluation path that can show all OU, positions and jobs, even if OU2 belongs to OU1 and only have positions on 2, and jobs on these positions
greets
Hi Carlos,
Try O_O_S_C
Regards,
Dilek
Similar Messages
-
Evaluation path for B002 - OOAW
Hi
I'm creating a evaluation path for fetching all reports under a line manager. Can someone please throw light on how to configure thie in OOAW. It works fine SAP_MANG, I tried to modify but iam not able to get this.
- AravindHi,
B002 is normally used as an O-O relationship. If you look at evaluation path O-S-P in OOAW. You will see how it is used here.
O-S-P might actually meet your requirement.
let me know.
thanks.
JB -
OM evaluation path showing chief position and subordinates
Hi experts, is there any standard OM evaluation path showing the reporting structure in Org chart like this?
OU
I
Chief
_____I_____
I I
Position Position
if there is no standard evaluation path, do I need to create extra relationship like S A002 Chief to every position??
What else solution would you suggest??
Many thanks!!Your drawing (and last message) indicates a relationship between O and "Chief" and between "Chief" and S (Position). As others have mentioned, this is not SAP standard - and to me it doesn't make sense either. The chief position (A12 relationship) and the regular positions (A003 relationship) all belong to the same org.units don't they?
For your need you would actually have to create your own "Chief" object type, make your own relations and your own evaluation paths. I would strongly advise against this. What is the business need for this requirement?
In PPOME you can move the manager (chief) position so it is the first position in the in the Org.Unit. This will give a better visual of the org.sturcture. Also, check the priority field in the relationship, and check the documentation for this.
Hope this is of some help. -
Evaluation path to get personnel number all the org unit and subordinates
Dear all,
I have OM issue to ask.This is the scenario:
Staff A belong to org 1. Under Org 1, I have org unit 1-A, 1-B and org unit 1-C.
Issue 1 :
I want to run report(RHSTRU00) to to generate all the staff number in org 1 (Include 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C).
Issue 2 :
I want to run report for 1-A, only staff belongs in org 1-A appear.The others not appear.
I was understanding I have to play around with evaluation path. Until now I can't find the suitable evaluation_path. I need your help.tqHi,
Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel. The standard report RHXSTRU02 will give you people by Org Unit. Just enter the Org Unit ID number and you will get the employees as output.
If you still want to use RHSTRU00, you can use O-P or O-S-P to get the employees and the positions.
Paul -
Hi,
I am working on an Evaluation Path which gives me all hierarchies (Type O) above one user. I don't get it yet :-(. I tried:
10 * B 008 Inhaber * S
40 S A 002 berichtet (L) an * *
Whats wrong? Thanks in advance.- done.
-
Hey all, as stated I'm a newbie at Illustrator. Any help's appreciated. My questions:
1) Is it possible to have anchor points be part of more than 1 path? I want to have 2 adjacent filled paths that share anchor points, so that if I move the common edge anchors, both shapes are affected. Kinda like in Flash, I suppose.
My guess is this is impossible though? Then how do people working with Illustrator a lot tackle this problem? I mean adjusting 2 shapes with several common anchor points (not shared, just in the same position), for adjacent shapes.
2) Is it possible to set the Pen tool to give visual feedback like in Photoshop when moving the mouse to a new position to add a new anchor point? What Photoshop does is show the path segment that would be created if you were to click at the current mouse position, whenever you move the mouse. Illustrator doesn't show this with me right now, so I'm left to guess what the exact path segment will look like when I click (less convenient imo).
3) Is there a way to always show all paths on the current layer, even if they are not selected? And I do NOT mean Outline mode, I'm aware of that. The problem I'm facing is that - when working with multiple paths - I want to see them all when adding a new path, so I can easily align anchor points and what not with the other paths, but I do NOT want to hide the image I'm tracing (which would happend in Outline mode).
Thanks in advance.
VictorYou might get what you re after using Live Paint. Here I have drawn an oval and a wavy line — two paths. After converting to a Live Paint object I can selectively fill and stroke any closed area or and segment.
No.
Put the object or image you are tracing on a Template layer. Or Command (Mac) or Control (Windows) click on the eye next to a layer name to change only that layer’s view mode. -
Report to show all superiors of an employee
Dear Group members,
My client wants a report to show all the hierarchial superiors of an employee. For eg- his superior,his next superior and so on to to the chief officer. Is there any report for this scenarioHi kaustubh,
Try report RHSTRU00 with evaluation path O-S-P.
Regards,
Dilek -
Regarding Evaluation path used in Organisation structure.
Dear All,
How would i be able to get to know the evaluation path used by organisational structure to display the structure. What i found in tcode : ppome is that it is showing evaluation but not path name. I want to know the reference path name which it is using.
Thanks,
RajHi
Check the Report:
RHINFAW0 - Infotype reporting.
Regards,
Sreeram -
Hi
Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
Any thoughts would be helpful.
-JTHello Raj,
you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
- AUTHC: R
- INFTY: 0001
- PERSA: *
- PERSG: *
- PERSK: *
- SUBTY: *
- VDSK1: *
If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
- Planversion: 01 (most likely)
- Object Type: O
- Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
- Status Vector: 12
- Depth: 0
- Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
Thats it
regards
Markus -
Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure
Hi all,
I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
Thank you and best regards,
AnnaHi Anna,
You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
Hope it helps!
Regards,
SR -
Please, i'd like to know how to create an evaluation path but with depth 2, i mean 2-level down... when i create one example i see that it shows the manager and ALL the subordinates. And i need to show the direct subordinates. Where can I manage the depth?????
Please I need your help!!!!The configuration is:
20 P B 008 Titular * S
30 S A 012 dirige... * O
35 O B 012 dirigido por... * S
40 O B 003 comprende * S
50 S A 008 Titular * P
60 S B 007 descrito por * C
70 O B 002 es superior directo de * O
80 S B 002 es superior directo de * S -
Evaluation Path Results change after ECC6 Upgrade
Hi All,
We have upgraded to ECC6 up to and including our QA environment. We are running an old java version of the MSS team viewer. We have a custom evaluation path, a modified version of SAP_MANG (Z_MANG) that we have been using for years. After upgrade any view that involves an organization is showing duplicates...
Example of output
Organization 1
Person 1
Person 2
Organization 1
Person 1
Person 2
Our Z_MANG Evaluation Path looks like this...
No Obj. Typ. A/B Relat Relat Name Priority Relat Obj Typ Skip
10 * B 008 Holder * S X
20 S A 012 Manages... * O
21 S A Z01 Salary Budg * *
22 S A Z02 HR Manages * *
30 US A 208 Is Identical to * * X
Only when we skip No 21 Salary Budg is the problem resolved. Has anyone run into problems after upgrade to ECC60 that the results for an exting evaluation path have changed like this?
Thanks,
Doug>
Doug Steckel wrote:
> Hi Ranganath,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. Yes the Skip flag is set on relationships 10 and 30. I would also think that would prevent this but it is not.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
not all relationships represent physical data records in the database. some are derived and without looking at the system, I believe the US 208 to P is a derived relationship.
Are you sure all the users you are testing with have a proper sy-uname setup for all respective pernrs in PA0105? -
SAP_MANG Evaluation Path not working for MSS after ECC6 Upgrade
Hello All,
We are upgrading to ECC6 and still using an older version of the java/HTMLB MSS Business Package. We are seeing strange results in the vacancy request overview iview (team viewer like component) which is using a view driven by SAP_MANG Evaluation Path.
SAP_MANG looks like this...
10 * B 008 * S
20 S A 012 * O
30 US A 208 * P
Our View is ZRCPOS using...
Eval Path - SAP_MANG
Eval Objects - O_NACH_S
Initial Evaluation Depth - 3
Column Group - ZRC_VACREQ_OV
Header Type - RC_VAC_HEADER
The iview is meant for position maintenance and should show a dropdown of orgs. When an org is selected a list of positions/holders is shown to modify, delimit, etc. The problem is that in the dropdown "Select organizational unit to display positions" instead of...
Test Org 1
Test Org 2
We have...
Test User1
Test Org 1
Test Org 2
...so the user us shown as an org. Right off I suspected the upgrade to MSS 60.1.22 (the newest version of the old Business Package) so I installed the older versions of the components and the actually still worked but also showed this condition. So I have ruled out the java side as a source of the problem.
Looking at HRP1001 I see the following relationships among suspect objects.
Object P 1234567 to Object S 9876543 via B008
Object S 1234567 to Object O 9876543 via A012
no relationships US to P via A208
Given the Eval Path above, does anyone have any idea why this would display this way or have a suggested approach to solve.
Thanks,
Doug>
Doug Steckel wrote:
> Hi Ranganath,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. Yes the Skip flag is set on relationships 10 and 30. I would also think that would prevent this but it is not.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug
not all relationships represent physical data records in the database. some are derived and without looking at the system, I believe the US 208 to P is a derived relationship.
Are you sure all the users you are testing with have a proper sy-uname setup for all respective pernrs in PA0105? -
ALV GRID Report is not showing all records which is in internal table
hi all,
have one doubt. please clarify me. ALV Report is working fine since long tiem. But suddenly this report is showing few records only for the given input. Example: it_main table have 50 records, but output is showing only 10 records only. (we have not made any modifications in this report).
temporarily i have given excel output file from it_main table. excel file is showing all records.
here it_main have all the records. but output is showing few records only. it is not showing any error. i have tested with REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY function also. but it also showing same results(few records only.)
please give me some idea.
FORM display_alv_report.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_buffer_active = 'X'
i_callback_program = sy-repid
is_layout = wa_layout
it_fieldcat = it_fcat
it_events = it_events
i_save = 'A'
is_variant = wa_variant
TABLES
t_outtab = it_main
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE text-204 " 'Error in Display the list'
TYPE 'I'.
LEAVE TO LIST-PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. . "DISPLAY_ALV_REPORT
Best Regards,
Srinivashi
Please study this program and give me suggestions.
ALV Declaration
DATA : it_events TYPE slis_t_event, "ALV event
it_fcat TYPE slis_t_fieldcat_alv, "Field catalog
it_list_top_of_page TYPE slis_t_listheader,
c_tabname TYPE slis_tabname VALUE 'IT_MAIN'.
DATA : wa_layout TYPE slis_layout_alv,
wa_event TYPE slis_alv_event,
wa_fcat TYPE slis_fieldcat_alv,
wa_variant TYPE disvariant.
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM material_pass.
PERFORM data_retrieval.
END-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM sub_display_report.
FORM sub_display_report .
DATA status(1).
IF r1 = 'X'.
PERFORM build_fieldcatalog USING :
'1' 'ERDAT' 'S.O DATE' '' '10' 'X',
'2' 'VBELN' 'SALE ORDER' '' '10' 'X',
'3' 'POSNR' 'SALE ITEM' '' '6' '',
'4' 'BSTKD' 'CUSTOMER PO' '' '35' '',
'5' 'BEZEI' 'REASON FOR REJECTION' '' '40' '',
'6' 'PLNUM' 'PLANNED ORDER' '' '10' '',
'7' 'AUFNR' 'PROD.ORDER.' '' '12' '',
'8' 'MATNR' 'MATERIAL NUMBER' '' '18' '',
'9' 'MAKTX' 'MATERIAL DESCRIPTION' '' '40' '',
'10' 'WERKS' 'PLANT' '' '4' '',
'11' 'KWMENG' 'SALE ORDER QTY' '' '15' '',
'12' 'VRKME' 'UNIT' '' '4' '',
'13' 'GAMNG' 'PROD.ORDER QTY' '' '13' '',
'14' 'IGMNG' 'CONFIRMED ORDER QTY' '' '13' '',
'15' 'GMEIN' 'UNIT' '' '4' '',
'16' 'MENGE' 'G.R QUANTITY' '' '13' '',
'17' 'SOBAL' 'S.O BALANCE' '' '13' '',
'18' 'PRDBAL' 'PROD.BALANCE' '' '13' '',
'19' 'GSM' 'GSM' '' '4' '',
'20' 'SIZE1' 'SIZE1' '' '10' '',
'21' 'SIZE2' 'SIZE2' '' '10' ''.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'
EXPORTING
filename = pathname
filetype = ftype
append = 'X'
write_field_separator = 'X'
TABLES
data_tab = it_mains
EXCEPTIONS
file_write_error = 1.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
status = 'S'.
ELSE.
status = 'E'.
ENDIF.
ELSEIF r2 = 'X' OR r3 = 'X'.
PERFORM build_fieldcatalog USING :
'1' 'ERDAT' 'S.O DATE' '' '10' 'X',
'2' 'VBELN' 'SALE ORDER' '' '10' 'X',
'3' 'POSNR' 'SALE ITEM' '' '6' '',
'4' 'BSTKD' 'CUSTOMER PO' '' '35' '',
'5' 'BEZEI' 'REASON FOR REJECTION' '' '40' '',
'6' 'PLNUM' 'PLANNED ORDER' '' '10' '',
'7' 'AUFNR' 'PROD.ORDER.' '' '12' '',
'8' 'MATNR' 'MATERIAL NUMBER' '' '18' '',
'9' 'MAKTX' 'MATERIAL DESCRIPTION' '' '40' '',
'10' 'WERKS' 'PLANT' '' '4' '',
'11' 'KWMENG' 'SALE ORDER QTY' '' '15' '',
'12' 'VRKME' 'UNIT' '' '4' '',
'13' 'GAMNG' 'PROD.ORDER QTY' '' '13' '',
'14' 'IGMNG' 'CONFIRMED ORDER QTY' '' '13' '',
'15' 'GMEIN' 'UNIT' '' '4' '',
'16' 'MENGE' 'G.R QUANTITY' '' '13' '',
'17' 'SOBAL' 'S.O BALANCE' '' '13' '',
'18' 'PRDBAL' 'PROD.BALANCE' '' '13' '',
'19' 'GSM' 'GSM' '' '4' '',
'20' 'SIZE1' 'SIZE1' '' '10' '',
'21' 'CUT1' 'CUT1' '' '11' '',
'22' 'SIZE2' 'SIZE2' '' '10' '',
'23' 'CUT2' 'CUT2' '' '11' '',
'24' 'SIZE3' 'SIZE3' '' '10' '',
'25' 'CUT3' 'CUT3' '' '11' '',
'26' 'SIZE4' 'SIZE4' '' '10' '',
'27' 'CUT4' 'CUT4' '' '11' '',
'28' 'SIZE5' 'SIZE5' '' '10' '',
'29' 'CUT5' 'CUT5' '' '11' '',
'30' 'SIZE6' 'SIZE6' '' '10' '',
'31' 'CUT6' 'CUT6' '' '11' ''.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'
EXPORTING
filename = pathname
filetype = ftype
append = 'X'
write_field_separator = 'X'
TABLES
data_tab = it_mainall
EXCEPTIONS
file_write_error = 1.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
status = 'S'.
ELSE.
status = 'E'.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
PERFORM build_layout.
PERFORM build_events.
PERFORM sub_comment_build USING it_list_top_of_page.
PERFORM sub_set_variant.
PERFORM display_alv_report.
IF status = 'S'.
MESSAGE 'Excel Output file Downloaded to Given Path' TYPE 'I'.
ELSE.
MESSAGE 'Download Not Possible' TYPE 'I'.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. " SUB_DISPLAY_REPORT
FORM BUILD_FIELDCATALOG
FORM build_fieldcatalog USING p_col_pos
p_fieldname
p_text
p_datatype
p_outputlen
p_col_freez.
wa_fcat-row_pos = '1'.
wa_fcat-col_pos = p_col_pos.
wa_fcat-fieldname = p_fieldname.
wa_fcat-tabname = c_tabname.
wa_fcat-reptext_ddic = p_text.
wa_fcat-datatype = p_datatype.
wa_fcat-ddic_outputlen = p_outputlen.
wa_fcat-key = p_col_freez.
APPEND wa_fcat TO it_fcat.
CLEAR wa_fcat.
ENDFORM. " BUILD_FIELDCATALOG
*& Form BUILD_LAYOUT
FORM build_layout.
CLEAR: wa_layout.
wa_layout-window_titlebar = 'LIST OF GSM WISE OPEN SALE ORDERS'.
wa_layout-colwidth_optimize = 'X'.
wa_layout-totals_text = 'CUMULATIVE'.
ENDFORM. "BUILD_LAYOUT
*& Form BUILD_EVENTS
FORM build_events.
CLEAR wa_event.
REFRESH it_events.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_EVENTS_GET'
EXPORTING
i_list_type = 0
IMPORTING
et_events = it_events
EXCEPTIONS
list_type_wrong = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
READ TABLE it_events INTO wa_event
WITH KEY name = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
wa_event-form = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
APPEND wa_event TO it_events.
CLEAR wa_event.
ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. "BUILD_EVENTS
-->P_IT_LIST_TOP_OF_PAGE text
FORM sub_comment_build USING it_top_of_page TYPE slis_t_listheader.
DATA ls_line TYPE slis_listheader.
CLEAR ls_line.
ls_line-typ = 'H'.
ls_line-info = str1.
APPEND ls_line TO it_top_of_page.
CLEAR ls_line.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
EXPORTING
it_list_commentary = t_header[].
ENDFORM. " SUB_COMMENT_BUILD
*& Form SUB_SET_VARIANT
text
--> p1 text
<-- p2 text
FORM sub_set_variant .
CLEAR wa_variant.
wa_variant-report = sy-repid.
wa_variant-username = sy-uname.
wa_variant-variant = c_variant.
wa_variant-variant = p_layout.
ENDFORM. " SUB_SET_VARIANT
*& Form DISPLAY_ALV_REPORT
*Display Report Using ALV GRID
FORM display_alv_report.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
EXPORTING
i_buffer_active = 'X'
i_callback_program = sy-repid
i_callback_pf_status_set = c_pf_status
i_callback_user_command = c_user_command
is_layout = wa_layout
it_fieldcat = it_fcat
it_sort = it_sort[]
it_events = it_events
i_save = 'A'
is_variant = wa_variant
TABLES
t_outtab = it_main
EXCEPTIONS
program_error = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE text-204 " 'Error in Display the list'
TYPE 'I'.
LEAVE TO LIST-PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. . "DISPLAY_ALV_REPORT
*ALV Report Header
FORM top_of_page.
DATA : t_header TYPE slis_t_listheader WITH HEADER LINE,
wa_header TYPE slis_listheader,
t_line LIKE wa_header-info,
ld_lines TYPE i,
ld_linesc(10) TYPE c.
wa_header-typ = 'H'.
T_HEADER-INFO = 'LIST OF GSM WISE OPEN SALE ORDERS'.
wa_header-info = str1.
APPEND wa_header TO t_header.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE'
EXPORTING
it_list_commentary = t_header[].
ENDFORM. "TOP_OF_PAGE
here it_main internal table having all data. but output is showing few records only.
pl. give some idea.
Thanks & Regards
Srinivas. -
Function module u0091GET_PRINT_PARAMETERSu0092 Not showing all columns
Hello all,
I am using function module GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS
CALL FUNCTION 'GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS'
EXPORTING
DESTINATION = LOC_DEST
COPIES = WF_COPIES
LIST_NAME = WF_LISTNAME
LIST_TEXT = WF_LISTTEXT
IMMEDIATELY = ' '
RELEASE = ' '
NEW_LIST_ID = 'X'
EXPIRATION = WF_DAYS
LINE_SIZE = 132
LINE_COUNT = 65
LAYOUT = 'X_65_132'
SAP_COVER_PAGE = 'X'
RECEIVER = 'SAP*'
DEPARTMENT = ''
NO_DIALOG = 'X'
IMPORTING
OUT_PARAMETERS = WF_PARAMS
VALID = WF_VALID.
NEW-PAGE PRINT ON PARAMETERS WF_PARAMS NO DIALOG.
PERFORM WRITE_PDF_SUMMARY USING P_VALID P_COND P_ZMGC P_ZOGC P_PDF.
NEW-PAGE PRINT OFF.
But in my report there are 10 columns and in download file its showing only 6 columns .If I increase that size to X_65_200 Then it shows all columns But its not readable. Please tell me how can I use that fix size X_65_132 & it will show all columns .
Message was edited by:
megha waykarYou r right,But that program is already developed in following sequence
*==> 1. Create Virtual Spool
using FUNCTION 'GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS'
*==> 2. Write Report to Virtual Spool. Use NEW-PAGE PRINT ON option.
NEW-PAGE PRINT ON PARAMETERS WF_PARAMS NO DIALOG.
PERFORM WRITE_PDF_SUMMARY USING P_VALID
NEW-PAGE PRINT OFF.
*===> 3. Prepare Path and set spool number.
*===> 4. Convert List to PDF format.
Use function 'CONVERT_ABAPSPOOLJOB_2_PDF'
*==> 5. download PDF file
CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_DOWNLOAD'.
and it's not showing readable download file.
I don't have to change whole coding. I just want to increase that font.
Maybe you are looking for
-
E-mails too small to read....
how do i fix e-mail lettering that is too small to read.....!!!!!?????
-
Add "Approver" field in AP Invoice PLD
Hi Experts, I want "Approver" field in AP Invoice PLD. How can I get. Please help me. Thanks for advance
-
Dear Friends, I want to have a report on Material Age analysis. The age intervals are, 0.30 days 31 - 90 days 91 - 120 days >120 days I know that there is no SAP standard report and have to get ABAP report developed. could anybody help me to create a
-
Hi, I am trying to make an iPhone application where there will be a settings view that is made of a tab bar controller. I have declared the tabBarController, and linked it to the app delegate in the main window.xib file. However, when I try to switch
-
Clarification required regarding Destinations
Hi Experts, I have a doubt regarding the security of destinations for WSIL, WSDL and RFC. Whenever we create the destinations for WSIL, WSDL and RFC, in the security part we select the "User ID / Password" mechanism and enter the user ID and password