Evaluation paths MANASS, MSSDIREC and MSSREPS

What is the major difference in Evaluation Paths : MANASS, MSSDIREC and MSSREPS ?
Is there any location, that I can get the help on the standard SAP evaluation paths created ?
Regards,
Srikanth

Hi,
You can check all the evaluation paths through transaction OOAW (table T778A). Since evaluation path is comprised of a set of relationships, you can check each of the three that you have listed in your post. Select one and double click on the u201Cevaluation path (individual maintenance)u201D folder on the left side column. You will see each of the three is constructed out of different relationships.
For a generic help, you can use F1.
Hope this helps.
Donnie

Similar Messages

  • Evaluation path OM

    Dear Experts,
    I have problem to determine what evaluation path to  use  to find  Relationships from org. unit   "up"& "down". What I have now separate relationship from om Higher level organizational units and Below level organizational units. I need  a single evaluation path because I want to track staff org unit..
    TQ in advance

    Like Volker said OOAW is good place to browse through different evaluation paths. I like using PPST (or report RHSTRU00) to test those evaluation paths. In your case O-O seems to return higher org. units and O-O_DOWN the lower level org. units.
    By studying different evaluation paths in OOAW and testing them in PPST it is soon pretty easy to come up with your own design if there is no standard evaluation path available. Technically evaluation paths just reads relationships between objects in table HRP1001.
    'saq

  • Evaluation path to get personnel number all the org unit and subordinates

    Dear all,
    I have OM issue to ask.This is the scenario:
    Staff A  belong to  org 1. Under Org  1, I  have org unit 1-A, 1-B and org unit 1-C.
    Issue 1 :
    I want to run report(RHSTRU00) to  to generate all the staff number in org 1 (Include 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C).
    Issue 2 :
    I  want to run report for 1-A, only staff belongs in org 1-A appear.The others not appear.
    I was understanding I have to play around with evaluation path. Until now I can't find the suitable evaluation_path. I need your help.tq

    Hi,
    Not sure why you want to reinvent the wheel.  The standard report RHXSTRU02 will give you people by Org Unit.  Just enter the Org Unit ID number and you will get the employees as output.
    If you still want to use RHSTRU00, you can use O-P or O-S-P to get the employees and the positions.
    Paul

  • OM evaluation path showing chief position and subordinates

    Hi experts, is there any standard OM evaluation path showing the reporting structure in Org chart like this?
                     OU
                       I
                    Chief
              _____I_____
              I                 I
        Position         Position
    if there is no standard evaluation path, do I need to create extra relationship like S A002 Chief to every position??
    What else solution would you suggest??
    Many thanks!!

    Your drawing (and last message) indicates a relationship between O and "Chief" and between "Chief" and S (Position). As others have mentioned, this is not SAP standard - and to me it doesn't make sense either.  The chief position (A12 relationship) and the regular positions (A003 relationship) all belong to the same org.units don't they?
    For your need you would actually have to create your own "Chief" object type,  make your own relations and your own evaluation paths.  I would strongly advise against this.  What is the business need for this requirement?
    In PPOME you can move the manager (chief) position so it is the first position in the in the Org.Unit.  This will give a better visual of the org.sturcture.  Also, check the priority field in the relationship, and check the documentation for this.
    Hope this is of some help.

  • Evaluation Path and Plan version

    Hi Experts,
    Can anyone please help me understand the concept of Evaluation Path and how the Evaluation path and the plan version settings are used in real time scenarios.
    Thanks,
    Sindhu.

    Hi,
    See, a reporting structure, staff assignment, organization structure are all evaluations paths themselves. The relationship between objects is defined.
    A lot of standard evaluation paths exist. But in case you dont have the path which meets your requirement you create a new one.
    Suppose you want to find out which all Tasks are linked to a job which is linked to a position which reports to an Org Unit
    so your evaluation path will traverse Org unit then position then the job then the tasks assigned.
    A relationship between an object is also a evalution path
    hope this helps
    Ajay

  • Evaluation Paths and Reports relating om

    Hi,
    How can we create external object types in om.
    How can we create the Evaluation Paths and what is relevance of table T7771 and T 777E.
    what are the reports specific to Om .

    External objects we just need to Assign
    Ex-Cost Centre and Holder of the psotion
    Cost Centre we assign
    and hodler of the position will get when we hire an employe
    regarding Evaluation path Check the tcode PPSC
    and give the Evaluation path which u want to see by assigning the various paths between different objects
    RHXEXI00 --> Existing Organizational Units
    RHXSTR01--> Organizational Structure with Positions
    RHXSTR02 --> Organizational Structure with Persons
    RHXEXI02 --> Existing Jobs
    RHXEXI03 --> Existing Positions
    Check the reports u can go to SAP East Acess and OM reports to view std reprots
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 18, 2009 1:22 PM

  • Evaluation path reading OM up and downwards

    Hello!
    Starting from a Person i need a evaluation path that reads P-S-O and then O upwards and downwards. From these O's the path has to find all O-S-C.
    So, is that possible to read the OM in the same path up and down?
    Thanks for any information!
    Best greetings,
    Gregor Brandstätter

    hi,
    Evaluation path only give you a tree branch, from a node up or down recursivelly.
    what for are you looking for this evaluation path, lookin for a resonsable of a decission? a report?.
    PPST is the transaction to test evaluation path. Try to find yourself what is the evaluation path you need using the matchcode, or try to test what you can do with a evaluation path.
    Kind regards,
    Miguel Ángel Orihuela.

  • MSS Team View evaluation path for non chief positions (s-s)

    Hello,
    We have a problem with display of employees under non chief manager - reporting managers (connection A002). In our organization we have line managers and under them team managers who are leading team of employees. Those managers want to see their employees under MSS Team View iView.
    I have checked forum posts and try to create correct evaluation path but i didn't get results yet. I have created 2 evaluation paths:
    Z_MANG (copy of SAP_MANG):
    10 *     B 008      S
    20 S    B 002      S
    30 US  A 208 P
    Z_S-S (copy of MSSDIREC):
    10 S  A 002     S
    20 S  A 008     P
    30 S  A 008     US
    I also included them into rules so:
    Root rule (rule 1) - Z_MANG
    Target rule (rule 3) - Z_S-S
    I have also done customizing under Object and Data provider and if I choose standard evaluation paths (e.g. SAP_MANG and MSSDIREC), I get employees shown - if I give manager a hat (A012 connection).
    Could you please help me with advice, where am I wrong? I think that first evaluation path (Z_MANG) is ok and it finds non chief manager, maybe is a problem with second one that don't show employees?
    Thank you for answers in advance.
    Best regards,
    David

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation path for team calender in MSS

    Hi Experts,
    I need to configure an evaluation path as follows.
    1.  A manager  M1 belongs to org unit O1. He manages Org unit O2.
    2.  Org unit O2 reports to O1. similarly O3 also reports to O1.
    3.  Now I need to develop a evaluation path in which, M1 should have visibility to all employees from both O2 and O3 in his MSS..
    I have tried out many combinations with A002 and B002 relationships. but it not working.
    So could you help me to build this evaluation path.
    Thanks
    Sameer

    there are standard evaluation paths available which should fulfil thsi requirement
    Check SAP_MANG
    SBESX
    MSSDIREC
    You can use report report RHSTRU00, to check your own path

  • Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG is not working

    Hello Friends,
    I am trying to run the Report RHSTRU00 with Evaluation Path BOSSORG  and it never produces output. If I run the report with any  other Evaluation path,it works......
    Can anybody help me in this issue,
    Thanks
    Kisu

    solved on own.

  • Evaluation paths in MSS

    Hi
    Our client is using "matrix" relationships A/B002 (is line supervisor of) in their organisation and wants to display them in MSS (latest version) teamviewer. We are using evaluation path WF_POSIT (User/person has as position)as rule for root objects and ORGA-P (Supervisory and subordinate positions with person display) as rule for target objects. However we are only able to show relationships 002 which are below the manager's position in the organisation and not those which are elsewhere in the organisation. This worked before with the client before our upgrade project.
    Can you advise if it's possible to show the 002 (is line supevisor of) relationships in MSS from all over the organisational structure (not only below the manager) with these evaluation paths or should some others be used?
    We can only see the 002's below the manager with or without structural authorizations and before the upgrade the evaluation paths were not modified from standard and permitted relationships are also the same.
    Any thoughts would be helpful.
    -JT

    Hello Raj,
    you need so called Structural Authorizations to accomplish your requirenment. But be aware this has a direct effect on your entire HR-based Authorization concept in your company if you switch it on!
    To activate Structural Authorizations call transaction OOAC and set the switch for ORGPD to a proper value which does meet your needs. (See http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c7/4aba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm) If it is already set to a value <> 0 is is already activated.
    The next thing you need to do is to maintain your Manager Role. The authorization object in question is P_ORGIN. If you want for instance to give a user read access to Infotype 0001 of another person you provide the following values:
    - AUTHC: R
    - INFTY: 0001
    - PERSA: *
    - PERSG: *
    - PERSK: *
    - SUBTY: *
    - VDSK1: *
    If you would stop here, every user would have access to Infotype 0001 of any other Person in your company. But as you want to restirct the access to just persons which lay within you evalution path B002, you have to maintain tables T77PR and T77UA.
    T77PR: Create a Profile (e.g. name it My Team or something) and add the following values: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/34/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    - Planversion: 01 (most likely)
    - Object Type: O
    - Evalution Patch: <Hint> You cant use B002 directly as B002 just give objects of type O back, but you  need object of type P. Use SBES for instance.
    - Status Vector: 12
    - Depth: 0
    - Function Module: RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT (Gives you the root object where to start the evaluation with path SBES.
    Now you need to assign your users (in your case your managers) to this profile. Use table T77UA to do this.
    Thats it
    regards
    Markus

  • Issue with Evaluation Path

    Hi All,
    I had created one Evaluation Path P-P.
    I want to retrieve all employees who are reporting to a particulat employee...
    ex: A is the manager
    B , C, D are team leads.
    Again B is having 2 more employees.. B1,B2...
    So when we execute for employee A all the B,C,D,B1,B2 need to be displayed. and I created the ZTEST ev path..
    code of EV:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S B 005 S  -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P ->  sub-ordinate positions
    and it is succesfully executed in PPSS..
    i HAVE WRITEN A SAMPLE PROGRAM to test that...
    eX:
    GET OBJEC.
    WRITE: OBJEC-OTYPE , OBJEC-OBJID.
    but system is going infinite loop and giving the following error...
    "\FUNCTION-POOL=RHAS\DATA=STRU_VERK[]"
    Let me know whats wrong here.. and more over issue is person to person retrieve is not possible?
    Regards
    Sas

    Hi.
    What's wrong is this:
    P B 008 S -> Geeting 'a' position
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions
    You are using two opposite links in the same WEGID, so this is what leads to the infinite loop. You should get rid of the first one and always start to evaluate with the current position of the manager.
    S B 005 S -> getting A' sub-ordinates positions
    S A008 P -> sub-ordinate positions

  • Error with Recursive Evaluation Path in PD Profile

    Dear Experts,
    I’m facing an issue using a recursive evaluation path inside a PD profile (transaction OOSP). My scenario is that a Central Person (CP) object is linked by 2 Person (P) objects.  I want the PD profile to give access to 2 Person (P) objects as long as I have access to either 1 of the Person (P) object. I have an evaluation path that is created using transaction OOAW as follows:
    10 P     A 209     * CP
    20 CP       B 209     * P
    The problem that I’m encountering is that the P object goes through a recursive loop during the evaluation path, i.e. the 2 P objects that are evaluated as output gets passed in as inputs again and go into a loop continuously. Is there a way to resolve this recursive issue or other alternative resolution that could meet my requirements? Thanks.

    Use field "Function Module" of table T77PR. You can program what you want yourself. Use function module RH_STRUC_GET to get the CP from the P, and then again RH_STRUC_GET to get the P from the CP. Add the resultings P to the output parameter. Press F1 on the field to see how the FB should look like.

  • HR - Evaluation Path Issue

    Hi ,
    There is a custom FM which is using  std FM   RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' to get back hierarchy of organisation .
    A custom evaluation path has been created and is being used - ZX.
    Now RH_STRUC_GET_MULTIPLE_ROOTS' is returning incorrect results. I need to check whether the evaluation path is defined properly. looks like there is an error in definition which might be causing this problem.
    I have no idea how evaluation path works. Could you please let me know the tcode where i could check on the custom evaluation path and rectify the error?
    Thanks in advance

    thanks for the reply.
    I can see the evaluation path in table t778a. In tcode ppss i do not know what the object id and object type for the evaluation path are?
    Any idea if there is any other way to check details?

  • Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

    Hi all,
    I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units  which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
    I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
    I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Anna

    Hi Anna,
    You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
    I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
    You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
    But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
    Hope it helps!
    Regards,
    SR

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way to sort a playlist on my iPhone alphabetically by Artist?

    Is there a way to sort a playlist on my iPhone alphabetically by Artist?  I can do it when I view the playlist through iTunes on my computer, but when I view it on my iPhone's iPod, it is sorted by the date the songs were added.  I add the songs thro

  • Report Layout

    Hi Gurus, I have a reporting scenario. I would like to have a report layout with the following.  In my columns, I would like to have 4 KFs of 1 Year and 4 KFs of prior Yr.  On top of the first 4 columns, I would like to have a title that says CurrYr

  • Problem with doing an average

    I wrote this code tonight, the sum, max and min work but I can't compute the average. Secondly, I using 0 to stop the loop, but I would like to use Q how would i do that? Int x = 1; double total = 0; int max = 0; int min = 0; double sum = ( total/ av

  • Asset: line items reduced the cut-off value by 1.00

    Hi, We have an invoice posted to wrong asset code and we are unable to reverse it due to the reason u201Cline items reduced the cut-off value by 1.00u201D Kindly advise how can we reverse this invoice from SAP system. The invoice was wrongly posted t

  • Output individual pages?

    Is it possible to output individual pages with Flashpaper from MS Word and still preserve text hyperlinks? I find that you can use Print to output individual pages when you select Flashpaper as the "printer" but it loses the links. My objective is to