Excessive buffering

Why am I getting excessive buffering. I recently switched to Maverick. I am on a home network however, my signal strength is around 90%. My guess is the Time Warner incoming router is messed up. I am on a mid 2010 Intel Imac.

The website could be busy.  Check w/your ISP to make sure the problem is not on their end. 

Similar Messages

  • Optimum Video File Size To Avoid Buffering?

    I am attempting to encode two 3 minute .flv files for my client for their website. I have encoded both of them under a number of settings and I am now down to tiny 8mb files in order for only one of them to play without excessive buffering. It will play, but it looks absolutely horrible, like the folks are under water. The original file was a .mmv that I first encoded to an .flv file around 18mb that looked fairly nice inside of Dreamweaver. I am using Adobe Media Encoder. The excessive buffering is "play one second, stop for 3-5 seconds", etc. So a 3 min video can take a half hour to play sometimes.
    I have gone through the whole process this forum recommends for updating drivers, checking the settings for the website (100mb) (locally now on flash 10.3) and the global settings (client site has unlimited access). I have checked my download speed (Download Speed: 5298 kbps (662.3 KB/sec transfer rate).
    These videos need to be viewable by many different people so there are many variables that I cannot control. I am trying to target DSL and above, not modem.
    We are actually able to stream internet material to our tv off this computer and my webdev computer is a new ssd running windows 7 pro.
    I would appreciate help in getting these two videos encoded and up on the website in a flash player so that they do not buffer excessively.
    Thank you.

    I did post on the AME forum a month ago about issues I was having encoding and an Adobe rep did attempt to help me privately. He finally said since the flash player was also involved I might have better luck with the flash forum, more visitors etc.
    There are hair raising stories going on that forum right now too. My original problem was that AME CS5 would stop encoding at about half way through an hour long video, compress the hour of video (powerpoint presentation) into 30 min and truncate the audio at 30 min. I ended up having to strip the hour long audio from the original file (f4v) with Quicktime pro and use it without the video (because of the poor quality video that resulted). It seems like right now folks are having similar, but slightly different issues encoding and some of them are shops where they do *a lot* of encoding. I don't encode that quantity. I just want to encode a single video once in a while for my client and I rely on AME to help me get through the process.
    I was told by someone who works with both PC and QT/Apple/Mac that if a file (in this case an f4v) was originally encoded in an Apple environment (Final Cut Pro) that my machine would need to have the QT codecs loaded to play the file. This despite the fact that the f4v file was being encoded in Adobe to an flv for flash playback. And that was the case, I ended up having to buy the QT Pro to work with the file and skip AME altogether. It makes no sense. But the fellow who took the f4v file to test said it played fine on his machine with the QT codecs loaded. Go figure. I didn't know the presentation was 60 min for 4 days until something just didn't seem right. AME or Flash Player couldn't play the file.
    Anyway, I thought I would give this forum a try. There must be a few web designers here that work with both products and might have some tips. I don't know if my problem is related to Flash Player or AME. It doesn't make any sense why this is happening. It's a 3 min interview of only moderate video quality. I received the original as a .wmv which probably complicates it even more. AME looks like it is encoding it ok, but Flash Player is butchering it.

  • Slow Streaming - Local Files (Video ) only

    I'm trying to pin down this slow streaming and excessive buffering problem:
    Apple TV 2nd gen - updated to latest software - operating wirelessly
    Fios Actiontec Router
    PC quadcore intel (fast)
    Everything else seems to be working fine, photos, internet streaming, etc. But when I try to stream local video files, it is extremely slow (if it starts at all)
    I have just run a test and Netflix and Youtube are blazing fast to load and then play long videos.
    I have just tested it with 2 new videos in my Itunes Home Video folder:
    The orginal is an mp4- 258 MB with a 5.75 bitrate
    I actually also converted this via itunes to a m4v file for testing purposes
    Both files are extremely slow if they load at all.Virtually unwatchable.
    The same file (mp4) uploaded to youtube and played through the YouTube app plays almost instantaneously.
    Could this be some router setting? Or is this all I can expect to get,
    Is there some other fix?
    Thanks

    It likely has to do with the encoding. Local streaming is done over the local network. Try converting with handbrake.
    Here are the supported specs for ATV
    H.264 video up to 1080p, 30 frames per second, High or Main Profile level 4.0 or lower, Baseline profile level 3.0 or lower with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps per channel, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
    MPEG-4 video up to 2.5 Mbps, 640 by 480 pixels, 30 frames per second, Simple Profile with AAC-LC audio up to 160 Kbps, 48kHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4, and .mov file formats
    Motion JPEG (M-JPEG) up to 35 Mbps, 1280 by 720 pixels, 30 frames per second, audio in ulaw, PCM stereo audio in .avi file format

  • Slow loading videos on iPad

    Videos on my iPad2 are almost impossible to watch because of the excessive buffering and slow download speeds. I don't have problems on any other device on my home wifi network. The issue is the same with embedded videos or the You Tube app that came on the iPad.
    Any thoughts on what to do?

    The tip about clearing the YouTube cookies was right on the money! This works in FF6 as well - good call - thanks!

  • Youtube HTML5 stopped working with version 37

    With this update, a lot of the youtubevideos i watch broke.
    it just sits there buffering.
    I found a solution though..
    If you type about:config into your adressfield, you get access to a lot of firefox settings.
    Find the value media.mediasource.enabled , set it to false, this will return html5 to the 720p 30 fps max that firefox ran at before V37, but, at least videos actually start now.

    ''jscher2000 [[#answer-712219|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    Mozilla and Google have been coordinating (battling?) on HTML5 on YouTube in recent months with the goal of finally having a smooth launch of Media Source Extensions.
    I haven't noticed any excess buffering, but I seldom try to use 1080p. I didn't notice any problems with this short video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpnaLfIguPQ
    There probably will be some other threads about this so we may discover another setting or add-on that is interfering with MSE.
    </blockquote>
    Some videos work, but a lot of them don't for me.
    on the ones that dont, the buffer is endless for me, regardless of quality setting on youtube when i run media.mediasource.enabled set to True, which is the default setting in v37.
    but not in prior versions, in 36, this defaulted to false, which is why i thought i'd try reverting it to false.
    And it worked.
    But the downside is that you don't get any of v37's html5 improvements, such as +720p and 60 fps.
    however, they're not of much use when the videos don't even start.

  • Network packet buffering is excessive and not all ...

    Hey there,
    Over the last few months I have been having an issue losing connection to certain IP addresses. I have contacted the company (Riot Games) in charge of hosting the server on the IP addresses and have been e-mailing them frequently trying certain fixes they have suggested. I haven't had much luck with the fixes my end so I was wondering what could be done your end to help resolve the problem. I am not trying to play the “blame game” either. I don’t mind whose fault the problem is, I just want it located so I can get it fixed. And since I have tried everything I can do from my network and Riot Games have tried several things their end, the final option is to contact my ISP.
    So far to try and correct the issue, I have tried the following fixes;
    - A full re-install and repair of the game I have a problem with.
    - Performing a clean boot of windows, disabling all non-essential start-up programs.
    - I have disabled all my firewalls and antivirus programs.
    - I have opened up all the ports on the Home Hub 3.0 to allow full access the to IP addresses I need to connect to.
    - I have removed all third party software which can interfere with internet connections, such as Pando Media Booster, uTorrent, Hamachi etc.
    - I always run the game as administrator. 
    - I have up to date firmware for my network card.
    - I've tried using a different router.
    - I switched to public DNS.
    - No other computer or device is turned on or using the internet connection wired, or wireless when I get the connection problem.
    - I have increased the priority on all 3 of the .exe applications which are used to run the game.
    - It seems to happen on random days and times, however a few cases where I have noticed it happen more often are at around 16:00 UK time and 23:00.
    - I have tried flushing the DNS resolver cache when the problem happens.
    Below I will provide you with 3 Tracerts to some of the IP addresses used to run the game.
    Tracert 1
    Tracing route to 31.186.224.132 over a maximum of 30 hops
    1 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.254 
    2 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms 217.32.141.5 
    3 25 ms 24 ms 25 ms 217.32.140.206 
    4 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms 213.120.161.98 
    5 29 ms 30 ms 30 ms 217.41.222.82 
    6 29 ms 29 ms 29 ms 217.41.222.178 
    7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms acc1-10GigE-0-2-0-7.bm.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.248.110] 
    8 42 ms 47 ms 47 ms core1-te0-3-0-2.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.248.16] 
    9 36 ms 37 ms 37 ms transit1-pos1-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.201.82] 
    10 37 ms 37 ms 37 ms t2as1-tge1-4.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.141] 
    11 37 ms 36 ms 38 ms 166-49-211-38.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.38] 
    12 48 ms 49 ms 48 ms xe-1-0-0.fra23.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.186.182] 
    13 52 ms 51 ms 51 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.73.166] 
    14 52 ms 52 ms 51 ms 31.186.224.132 
    15 * * * Request timed out.
    16 * * * Request timed out.
    17 * * * Request timed out.
    18 * * * Request timed out.
    19 * * * Request timed out.
    20 * * * Request timed out.
    21 * * * Request timed out.
    22 * * * Request timed out.
    23 * * * Request timed out.
    24 * * * Request timed out.
    25 * * * Request timed out.
    26 * * * Request timed out.
    27 * * * Request timed out.
    28 * * * Request timed out.
    29 * * * Request timed out.
    30 * * * Request timed out.
    Trace complete.
    Tracert 2
    Tracing route to 95.172.69.84 over a maximum of 30 hops
    1 <1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.254 
    2 26 ms 25 ms 25 ms 217.32.141.5 
    3 26 ms 25 ms 24 ms 217.32.140.222 
    4 30 ms 31 ms 30 ms 217.41.216.130 
    5 30 ms 30 ms 57 ms 217.41.222.82 
    6 30 ms 30 ms 29 ms 217.41.222.178 
    7 31 ms 30 ms 30 ms acc1-10GigE-0-2-0-6.bm.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.248.108] 
    8 41 ms 46 ms 47 ms core1-te0-4-0-4.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.248.4] 
    9 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms core1-pos5-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [194.74.65.122] 
    10 37 ms 37 ms 38 ms t2as1-tge1-4.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.141] 
    11 39 ms 38 ms 38 ms 166-49-211-38.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.38] 
    12 52 ms 52 ms 52 ms xe-1-2-1.fra23.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.184.78] 
    13 51 ms 51 ms 52 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.73.166] 
    14 51 ms 52 ms 52 ms 95.172.69.84 
    15 * * * Request timed out.
    16 * * * Request timed out.
    17 * * * Request timed out.
    18 * * * Request timed out.
    19 * * * Request timed out.
    20 * * * Request timed out.
    21 * * * Request timed out.
    22 * * * Request timed out.
    23 * * * Request timed out.
    24 * * * Request timed out.
    25 * * * Request timed out.
    26 * * * Request timed out.
    27 * * * Request timed out.
    28 * * * Request timed out.
    29 * * * Request timed out.
    30 * * * Request timed out.
    Trace complete.
    Tracert 3
    Tracing route to 64.74.251.40 over a maximum of 30 hops
    1 <1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.254 
    2 43 ms 43 ms 44 ms 217.32.141.5 
    3 263 ms 26 ms 26 ms 217.32.140.206 
    4 424 ms 30 ms 31 ms 213.120.161.98 
    5 288 ms 30 ms 29 ms 217.41.222.82 
    6 80 ms 29 ms 29 ms 217.41.222.178 
    7 30 ms 31 ms 29 ms acc1-10GigE-3-0-7.bm.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.248.118] 
    8 45 ms 47 ms 47 ms core1-te0-3-0-2.ealing.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.248.16] 
    9 37 ms 38 ms 37 ms transit1-pos1-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [62.6.201.82] 
    10 380 ms 38 ms 37 ms t2as1-tge4-4.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.145] 
    11 39 ms 38 ms 38 ms 166-49-211-38.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.38] 
    12 569 ms 105 ms 105 ms xe-11-0-0.nyc30.ip4.tinet.net [213.200.80.58] 
    13 114 ms 114 ms 114 ms internap-gw.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.98] 
    14 583 ms 184 ms 115 ms border1.po1-20g-bbnet1.nym008.pnap.net [216.52.95.1] 
    15 109 ms 108 ms 108 ms 64.74.251.40 
    16 * * * Request timed out.
    17 * * * Request timed out.
    18 * * * Request timed out.
    19 * * * Request timed out.
    20 * * * Request timed out.
    21 * * * Request timed out.
    22 * * * Request timed out.
    23 * * * Request timed out.
    24 * * * Request timed out.
    25 * * * Request timed out.
    26 * * * Request timed out.
    27 * * * Request timed out.
    28 * * * Request timed out.
    29 * * * Request timed out.
    30 * * * Request timed out.
    Trace complete.
    A process log of all the applications I have running on my computer when trying to play the game.
    Process List
    Image Name PID Session Name Session# Mem Usage Status User Name CPU Time Window Title 
    ========================= ======== ================ =========== ============ =============== ================================================== ============ ========================================================================
    System Idle Process 0 Services 0 24 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 16:21:42 N/A 
    System 4 Services 0 304 K Unknown N/A 0:03:58 N/A 
    smss.exe 240 Services 0 1,184 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    csrss.exe 328 Services 0 5,204 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:03 N/A 
    wininit.exe 424 Services 0 4,608 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    csrss.exe 444 Console 1 9,716 K Running NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:01:22 N/A 
    services.exe 480 Services 0 8,720 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:01 N/A 
    lsass.exe 504 Services 0 13,480 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:11 N/A 
    lsm.exe 512 Services 0 4,356 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    winlogon.exe 628 Console 1 7,216 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 660 Services 0 9,812 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:04 N/A 
    svchost.exe 740 Services 0 8,180 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 816 Services 0 18,008 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 864 Services 0 117,708 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:47 N/A 
    svchost.exe 904 Services 0 39,052 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:03 N/A 
    svchost.exe 220 Services 0 11,620 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 896 Services 0 24,184 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE 0:00:08 N/A 
    spoolsv.exe 1128 Services 0 12,028 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 1160 Services 0 7,776 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 1228 Services 0 14,020 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    taskhost.exe 1376 Console 1 8,060 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 MCI command handling window 
    dwm.exe 1436 Console 1 46,164 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:41 DWM Notification Window 
    explorer.exe 1532 Console 1 51,484 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:12 N/A 
    WLIDSVC.EXE 1676 Services 0 12,056 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    SearchIndexer.exe 2020 Services 0 16,612 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:01 N/A 
    WLIDSVCM.EXE 1256 Services 0 3,360 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 1644 Services 0 5,288 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    WUDFHost.exe 1340 Services 0 6,308 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A 
    svchost.exe 2864 Services 0 15,016 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:04 N/A 
    wmpnetwk.exe 2904 Services 0 8,552 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE 0:01:04 N/A 
    Ventrilo.exe 1612 Console 1 30,996 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:06:54 Ventrilo 
    dllhost.exe 1980 Console 1 6,000 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 OleMainThreadWndName 
    audiodg.exe 2168 Services 0 18,536 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\LOCAL SERVICE 0:07:33 N/A 
    iTunes.exe 2508 Console 1 158,500 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:01:05 iTunes 
    iPodService.exe 900 Services 0 7,432 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM 0:00:00 N/A 
    AppleMobileDeviceHelper.e 2052 Console 1 11,468 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    conhost.exe 2720 Console 1 3,548 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    distnoted.exe 2676 Console 1 5,616 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    conhost.exe 852 Console 1 3,528 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    APSDaemon.exe 2960 Console 1 12,500 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 OleMainThreadWndName 
    chrome.exe 3636 Console 1 103,340 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:01:24 Hotmail - [email protected] - Windows Live - Google Chrome 
    chrome.exe 3868 Console 1 40,648 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:07 N/A 
    chrome.exe 3620 Console 1 21,140 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    chrome.exe 4084 Console 1 34,516 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:12 N/A 
    chrome.exe 2144 Console 1 17,052 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    chrome.exe 2184 Console 1 7,816 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 OleMainThreadWndName 
    ClickClean.exe 3172 Console 1 4,080 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 ClickClean 
    chrome.exe 968 Console 1 91,868 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:47 N/A 
    chrome.exe 3520 Console 1 140,400 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:52 N/A 
    notepad.exe 2316 Console 1 6,396 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 Tracert3.log - Notepad 
    cmd.exe 4088 Console 1 2,988 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 Administrator: C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe - tasklist /v 
    conhost.exe 3616 Console 1 5,756 K Running KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 CicMarshalWnd 
    tasklist.exe 3220 Console 1 6,228 K Unknown KAMOS-PC\James.Cornell 0:00:00 N/A 
    WmiPrvSE.exe 1364 Services 0 6,296 K Unknown NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE 0:00:00 N/A
    A NetworkInfo Log.
    Windows IP Configuration
    Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : KAMOS-PC
    Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : 
    Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
    IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : 
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-25-22-2A-BE-AC
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::fd67:7436:ba3d:aac9%10(Preferred) 
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.65(Preferred) 
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : 29 April 2012 13:10:01
    Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : 30 April 2012 13:10:05
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 234890530
    DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-15-39-32-44-00-25-22-2A-BE-AC
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 8.8.8.8
    8.8.4.4
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Tunnel adapter isatap.{89550F24-F82B-4905-869D-3F03640055CF}:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : 
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : 
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    IPv6 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 2001:0:5ef5:79fb:20:31b7:a95f:bc6a(Preferred) 
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::20:31b7:a95f:bc6a%12(Preferred) 
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : ::
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Disabled
    Pinging www.l.google.com [173.194.67.106] with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 173.194.67.106: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=44
    Reply from 173.194.67.106: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=44
    Reply from 173.194.67.106: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=44
    Reply from 173.194.67.106: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=44
    Ping statistics for 173.194.67.106:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 45ms, Average = 44ms
    IMPORTANT: "netsh firewall" is deprecated;
    use "netsh advfirewall firewall" instead.
    For more information on using "netsh advfirewall firewall" commands
    instead of "netsh firewall", see KB article 947709
    at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=121488 .
    The service has not been started.
    MTU MediaSenseState Bytes In Bytes Out Interface
    4294967295 1 0 370332 Loopback Pseudo-Interface 1
    1504 1 141139568 42556931 Local Area Connection
    MIB-II IP Statistics
    Forwarding is: Disabled
    Default TTL: 128
    In Receives: 318925
    In Header Errors: 0
    In Address Errors: 0
    Datagrams Forwarded: 0
    In Unknown Protocol: 0
    In Discarded: 1763
    In Delivered: 318870
    Out Requests: 411674
    Routing Discards: 0
    Out Discards: 0
    Out No Routes: 6
    Reassembly Timeout: 60
    Reassembly Required: 6
    Reassembled Ok: 2
    Reassembly Failures: 0
    Fragments Ok: 3
    Fragments Failed: 0
    Fragments Created: 6
    A few Network Analysis Results from various dates taken when the problem started.
    Network Analysis 1
    Network Analysis 2
    Network Analysis 3
    Network Analysis 4
    Network Analysis 5
    Network Analysis 6
    Network Analysis 7
    Network Analysis 8
    Network Analysis 9
    All of the above things I have sent to Riot Games over the course of the last month which they have required to help them investigate and locate the problem. Hopefully they will be of some use to you as well.
    I’m sorry I’ve had to include all this information in a forum post however there is no e-mail address I could find to contact you regardingTech Support. Plus on the two occasions I’ve called the Tech Support, I’ve been palmed off and they have refused to take any of information I can provide, instead offering to obtain the information themselves at a £20 fee.
    I would really appreciate any help with this matter, and if there is anything else I can provide you with to aid solving the problem, please don’t hesitate to ask.
    Thanks in advance.

    This is as I posted a Self help forum the only BT presence are the forum moderators your very likely to get help from other forum users it is just a matter of waiting until some one with gaming knowledge reads your post
    If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

  • Excessive no. of ports remaining open with HttpUrlConnection

    Hi,
    I am facing problem where excess no. of TCP ports getting opened or remaining open on client of my application (from where I send XML requests to application).
    The scenario happens when I simulate a load of 100 concurrent requests through JMeter (SOAP/XML-RPC requests)
    Client app is deployed on Tomcat 5.5 on a Linux box.
    My code looks like follow:
    try {
    URL url = new URL(<url string>);
    HttpURLConnection httpURLConnection = (HttpURLConnection) url.openConnection();
    httpURLConnection.setRequestMethod("POST");
    httpURLConnection.setConnectTimeout(10000);
    httpURLConnection.setDoOutput(true);
    OutputStreamWriter outputStreamWriter = new OutputStreamWriter(httpURLConnection.getOutputStream());
    outputStreamWriter.write(<write something>);
    outputStreamWriter.close();
    BufferedReader bufferedReader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(httpURLConnection.getInputStream()));
    <read buffered reader here>
    bufferedReader.close();
    } catch {}
    finally {
    httpURLConnection.disconnect();
    }What's wrong here that is causing excessive TCP IP ports to remain open?
    Also, I want to restrict the no. of Http connections that I can make from client to server. Is this possible?
    I searched about <Connector acceptCount=<> .... > in server.xml on Tomcat. But it is about incoming connections on Tomcat port and not the outgoing connections. I also explored -Dhttp.maxconnections but it doesn't serve my purpose. Only option I can think about is creating a custom object pool for HttpConnectionUrl (which I would like to avoid due to some reasons)
    Is there any built-in support/ready API/tool to restrict no .of connections while sending Http requests?
    regards,
    suraj

    I am facing problem where excess no. of TCP ports getting opened or remaining open on clientCompared to what?
    The scenario happens when I simulate a load of 100 concurrent requests through JMeter (SOAP/XML-RPC requests)Aha.
    What's wrong here that is causing excessive TCP IP ports to remain open? Nothing except your definition of 'excessive'. You are simulating hundreds of clients on one client host so you will get all the bahaviour of those client hosts in your single client host. The problem is in the simulation, not the TCP ports.
    Also, I want to restrict the no. of Http connections that I can make from client to server. Is this possible? Why?

  • Excess Swap Space....

    Hi all,
    Please I would like to find out if large swap space has any effect on the performance of a Server.
    Thanks

    No. Generally not a good idea.
    Oh, details? Sure.
    To begin with you do <u>not</u> want any active paging going on; it kills performance quickly. It is normal to see some memory pages being evicted to paging store; the kernel does some proactive evictions of stale memory pages just in case the room is needed sometime in the future.
    $ top -n1
    top - 07:37:55 up 3 days, 19:58,  1 user,  load average: 0.01, 0.82, 1.26
    Tasks: 302 total,  15 running, 287 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
    Cpu(s):  4.5%us,  6.2%sy,  0.1%ni, 88.2%id,  0.8%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.1%si,  0.0%st
    Mem:   6902244k total,  6486860k used,   415384k free,   600968k buffers
    Swap:  8392696k total,    14496k used,  8378200k free,  1290552k cachedThe swap utilization reported by top(1) is misleading because it shows a static picture of how much swap space is being used. The problem is that you can't distinguish between the stale-memory evictions and the unwanted paging activity. Better to use the vmstat(1) tool for this:
    $ vmstat 1 3
    procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu-----
    r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st
    1  0  14496 411440 601624 1293196    0    0    48   103   28   24  5  6 88  1  0
    61  0  14496 411316 601632 1293196    0    0     0   212 5224 6751  2  4 93  2  0
    5  0  14496 411152 601640 1293188    0    0     0    16 7205 8826  5 11 83  1  0The interesting metric here is the swap-in (si) column, which counts the number of pages read into memory from the paging store. It is OK for this to show some minor values, but should the count increase rapidly for some time you should regard this as a sign of swap activity and fix it.
    Lots of installation documentation suggests that the size of paging store be at least equal to the physical memory size or even larger. On anything much larger than an old desktop this is simply too much space: the system will become unusably slow long before this amount of space is utilized.
    Ancient history: at one time some UNIX ports used the swap space to temporarily store a memory image of a system oops. Every boot, the kernel checked the swap space for a special signature pattern to see if the swap space held such an image.
    Back to the present: having an excessively-large paging store simply wastes disk space. Sometimes the extra paging store can be useful to have because it can postpone a Linux out-of-memory (OOM) kill by the kernel if you have a run-away program leaking memory, but most likely this simply trades an OOM kill for really poor performance. Your mileage may vary, as they say.

  • HELP - Slave Router Video Buffering

    FIrst, thanks to all for any help and suggestions.  I am technical enough to be dangerous.  Here's my problem.
    Primary wireless router is E2500, everything ran fine except wireless laser printer in far end of the house would not connect.  Bought an E1200 and set it up as slave.  Printer works well.   However connecting any laptop to that router (great connection 5 bars), get excessively choppy playback, constantly "buffering", also slow internet searches with lots of "waiting".   If I reconnect laptop to the masterE2500 which is at the other end of the house (only 2 bars vs. 5 with the slave router), video playtback and internet searching is smooth.  Clearly something in the interaction of the two routers is slowing down internet performance at the slave router.
    Here's where my technical skills stop being helpful.  But some guesses?   SHould I turn off firewall at the slave?  IS the primary still the firewall for the "home network"?  Are there buffer settings between the routers?  
    Again...thanks to all!!!!

    Check to see if you have them cascaded properly with the right ip addresses and settings.  If your E1200 supports bridge mode, then use bridge mode.  (I'm pretty sure it does.)   Update both to latest firmware before you begin.
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/GetArticle.aspx?docid=28cee6a2fb0d4176a2210942d1d5836c_Setting_up_the_...
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?pid=80&vw=1&articleid=3733

  • Rollbacks excessive

    Hi
    I have an application issue causing excessive rollbacks with 16.13% rollbacks per transaction. Due to Oracle´s assumption of a commit, the rollback process is very
    expensive and should only be used when necessary.up to this i know but how i recover from this pls tell me.
    secondly how i increase db_cache_size.
    my shared pool maybe filled with non-reusable SQL with 93.03% memory usage.pls dignose it.
    how i use KEEP pool to avoid unnecessary I/O.
    Nareshs
    Edited by: Nareshs on Dec 14, 2008 9:26 PM

    A cleaned up version of the Statspack report with the code tags in place:
    Cache Sizes (end)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                   Buffer Cache:        32M      Std Block Size:         4K
               Shared Pool Size:        44M          Log Buffer:       512K
    Load Profile
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~                            Per Second       Per Transaction
                      Redo size:             22,994.54              5,614.23
                  Logical reads:                846.50                206.68
                  Block changes:                168.21                 41.07
                 Physical reads:                436.98                106.69
                Physical writes:                  3.24                  0.79
                     User calls:                 35.35                  8.63
                         Parses:                 18.10                  4.42
                    Hard parses:                  3.00                  0.73
                          Sorts:                  2.54                  0.62
                         Logons:                  0.00                  0.00
                       Executes:                 64.39                 15.72
                   Transactions:                  4.10
      % Blocks changed per Read:   19.87    Recursive Call %:    90.01
    Rollback per transaction %:    0.12       Rows per Sort:    22.22
    Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                Buffer Nowait %:   99.99       Redo NoWait %:  100.00
                Buffer  Hit   %:   48.49    In-memory Sort %:   99.77
                Library Hit   %:   96.75        Soft Parse %:   83.41
             Execute to Parse %:   71.89         Latch Hit %:   99.99
    Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:   44.71     % Non-Parse CPU:   99.88
    Wait Events for
    s - second
    cs - centisecond - 100th of a second
    ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
    us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second
    ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
                                                                       Avg
                                                         Total Wait   wait    Waits
    Event                               Waits   Timeouts  Time (s)    (ms)     /txn
    log file sync                      19,338          0        194     10      3.5
    log file parallel write            25,170     18,348        147      6      4.5
    db file scattered read             68,362          0         64      1     12.2
    db file sequential read            62,643          0         29      0     11.2
    control file parallel write           445          0         17     38      0.1
    db file parallel write                678        678         16     24      0.1
    async disk IO                         241          0          4     18      0.0
    control file sequential read          232          0          2      7      0.0
    direct path read                       70          0          0      4      0.0
    direct path write                      42          0          0      5      0.0
    SQL*Net break/reset to clien          748          0          0      0      0.1
    db file parallel read                  12          0          0      6      0.0
    buffer busy waits                      94          0          0      1      0.0
    SQL*Net more data to client           199          0          0      0      0.0
    latch free                             12          0          0      0      0.0
    LGWR wait for redo copy                12          0          0      0      0.0
    undo segment extension                 28         28          0      0      0.0
    SQL*Net message from client        48,306          0     13,221    274      8.6
    virtual circuit status                 45         45      1,350  29999      0.0
    SQL*Net message to client          48,306          0          0      0      8.6
    SQL*Net more data from clien           47          0          0      0      0.0
    Instance Activity Stats
    Statistic                                      Total     per Second    per Trans
    CPU used by this session                       3,467            2.5          0.6
    CPU used when call started                     3,468            2.5          0.6
    CR blocks created                                 55            0.0          0.0
    DBWR buffers scanned                          18,582           13.6          3.3
    DBWR checkpoint buffers written                1,626            1.2          0.3
    DBWR checkpoints                                   0            0.0          0.0
    DBWR free buffers found                       18,131           13.3          3.2
    DBWR lru scans                                    39            0.0          0.0
    DBWR make free requests                           47            0.0          0.0
    DBWR summed scan depth                        18,582           13.6          3.3
    DBWR transaction table writes                      7            0.0          0.0
    DBWR undo block writes                         1,642            1.2          0.3
    SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client             48,280           35.3          8.6
    background checkpoints completed                   1            0.0          0.0
    background checkpoints started                     0            0.0          0.0
    background timeouts                            1,337            1.0          0.2
    buffer is not pinned count                   791,402          578.5        141.3
    buffer is pinned count                     3,631,485        2,654.6        648.1
    bytes received via SQL*Net from c          6,039,592        4,414.9      1,077.9
    bytes sent via SQL*Net to client           5,058,304        3,697.6        902.8
    calls to get snapshot scn: kcmgss            177,619          129.8         31.7
    calls to kcmgas                              103,088           75.4         18.4
    calls to kcmgcs                                1,453            1.1          0.3
    change write time                                172            0.1          0.0
    cleanouts and rollbacks - consist                  4            0.0          0.0
    cleanouts only - consistent read                   3            0.0          0.0
    cluster key scan block gets                   14,438           10.6          2.6
    cluster key scans                              5,526            4.0          1.0
    commit cleanout failures: callbac                  2            0.0          0.0
    commit cleanout failures: cannot                   2            0.0          0.0
    commit cleanouts                              55,009           40.2          9.8
    commit cleanouts successfully com             55,005           40.2          9.8
    consistent changes                                90            0.1          0.0
    consistent gets                              957,540          700.0        170.9
    consistent gets - examination                144,659          105.7         25.8
    cursor authentications                            25            0.0          0.0
    data blocks consistent reads - un                 90            0.1          0.0
    db block changes                             230,107          168.2         41.1
    db block gets                                200,468          146.5         35.8
    deferred (CURRENT) block cleanout             31,872           23.3          5.7
    dirty buffers inspected                           50            0.0          0.0
    enqueue conversions                                1            0.0          0.0
    enqueue releases                             105,919           77.4         18.9
    enqueue requests                             105,919           77.4         18.9
    enqueue waits                                      0            0.0          0.0
    execute count                                 88,084           64.4         15.7
    free buffer inspected                            113            0.1          0.0
    free buffer requested                        650,274          475.4        116.1
    hot buffers moved to head of LRU               1,991            1.5          0.4
    immediate (CR) block cleanout app                  7            0.0          0.0
    immediate (CURRENT) block cleanou                103            0.1          0.0
    leaf node splits                                  44            0.0          0.0
    logons cumulative                                  2            0.0          0.0
    messages received                             25,947           19.0          4.6
    messages sent                                 25,946           19.0          4.6
    no buffer to keep pinned count                 5,325            3.9          1.0
    no work - consistent read gets               735,115          537.4        131.2
    opened cursors cumulative                     23,463           17.2          4.2
    parse count (failures)                             1            0.0          0.0
    parse count (hard)                             4,107            3.0          0.7
    parse count (total)                           24,763           18.1          4.4
    parse time cpu                                   418            0.3          0.1
    parse time elapsed                               935            0.7          0.2
    physical reads                               597,793          437.0        106.7
    physical reads direct                          1,288            0.9          0.2
    physical writes                                4,433            3.2          0.8
    physical writes direct                         2,228            1.6          0.4
    physical writes non checkpoint                 4,348            3.2          0.8
    pinned buffers inspected                          56            0.0          0.0
    prefetch clients - default                         2            0.0          0.0
    prefetched blocks                            465,529          340.3         83.1
    prefetched blocks aged out before                  6            0.0          0.0
    process last non-idle time             2,458,805,155    1,797,372.2    438,837.3
    recursive calls                              435,585          318.4         77.7
    recursive cpu usage                            1,665            1.2          0.3
    redo blocks written                           84,147           61.5         15.0
    redo buffer allocation retries                     0            0.0          0.0
    redo entries                                 115,533           84.5         20.6
    redo log space requests                            0            0.0          0.0
    redo log space wait time                           0            0.0          0.0
    redo size                                 31,456,528       22,994.5      5,614.2
    redo synch time                               19,391           14.2          3.5
    redo synch writes                             20,648           15.1          3.7
    redo wastage                              10,304,452        7,532.5      1,839.1
    redo write time                               20,007           14.6          3.6
    redo writer latching time                          0            0.0          0.0
    redo writes                                   25,161           18.4          4.5
    rollback changes - undo records a                  1            0.0          0.0
    rollbacks only - consistent read                  50            0.0          0.0
    rows fetched via callback                      5,516            4.0          1.0
    session connect time                   2,458,805,155    1,797,372.2    438,837.3
    session logical reads                      1,158,008          846.5        206.7
    session pga memory                         2,230,308        1,630.3        398.1
    session pga memory max                     2,278,192        1,665.4        406.6
    session uga memory                           398,424          291.3         71.1
    session uga memory max                       675,788          494.0        120.6
    shared hash latch upgrades - no w             73,710           53.9         13.2
    shared hash latch upgrades - wait                  0            0.0          0.0
    sorts (disk)                                       8            0.0          0.0
    sorts (memory)                                 3,468            2.5          0.6
    sorts (rows)                                  77,223           56.5         13.8
    summed dirty queue length                        519            0.4          0.1
    switch current to new buffer                  51,025           37.3          9.1
    table fetch by rowid                       1,906,675        1,393.8        340.3
    table fetch continued row                      1,826            1.3          0.3
    table scan blocks gotten                     582,439          425.8        104.0
    table scan rows gotten                    20,054,333       14,659.6      3,579.2
    table scans (long tables)                      1,371            1.0          0.2
    table scans (short tables)                     8,220            6.0          1.5
    transaction rollbacks                              0            0.0          0.0
    user calls                                    48,356           35.4          8.6
    user commits                                   5,596            4.1          1.0
    user rollbacks                                     7            0.0          0.0
    write clones created in foregroun                  0            0.0          0.0
    init.ora Parameters
                                                                      End value
    Parameter Name                Begin value                       (if different)
    audit_trail                   TRUE
    background_dump_dest          D:\oracle\admin\dbprod\bdump
    compatible                    9.0.0
    control_files                 D:\oracle\oradata\dbprod\CONTROL0
    core_dump_dest                D:\oracle\admin\dbprod\cdump
    db_block_size                 4096
    db_cache_size                 33554432
    db_domain
    db_name                       dbprod
    dispatchers                   (PROTOCOL=TCP)(SER=MODOSE), (PROT
    fast_start_mttr_target        300
    instance_name                 dbprod
    java_pool_size                54525952
    large_pool_size               5242880
    log_archive_dest_1            location=D:\oracle\oradata\dbprod
    log_archive_format            %t_%s.dbf
    log_archive_start             TRUE
    max_enabled_roles             148
    open_cursors                  300
    processes                     150
    remote_login_passwordfile     EXCLUSIVE
    shared_pool_size              46137344
    sort_area_size                524288
    timed_statistics              TRUE
    undo_management               AUTO
    undo_tablespace               UNDOTBS
    user_dump_dest                D:\oracle\admin\dbprod\udump
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Comments about the Statspack report will follow in another reply.
    Charles Hooper
    IT Manager/Oracle DBA
    K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

  • 关于cache buffers chains的问题

    question from oracler:
    由于没有代码,所以sql语句没法改。
    1、4_28_awr.html是最初的状态cache buffers chains 征用严重,后来我把热点的2个索引INFO_KEYWORD、PKKEY_ARTICLE单独挪到了16k和4k的非标准表空间,这样多增加了几个池子希望可以降低征用。
    2、4_28_2awr.html虽然cache buffers chains 还是比较多,但是waitstime比较低,没有影响前台使用。
    3、428_3_awr.html 是刚才cpu的使用率又上去了,做的awr报告,发现cache buffers chains仍然较多,waitstime明显上去了。
    请教:因为没办法修改sql语句的程序代码,只能从数据库层面入手。尽量降低热点块。是不是可以尝试将2个索引表空间的pctfree再增加到30%或者更高。或者2个索引采用4k的非标准块,这样分布在每个块中的行会比较少一点。我觉得我设置的16k块大小可能有点问题,盼赐教。
    http://t.askmaclean.com/viewthread.php?tid=866&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Ddigest

    就症结来看 是SQL语句存在优化空间,大多都Buffer Gets过高 这意味着大量的逻辑读
    Logical reads: 952,053.46 511,723.68
    在其中一个AWR中 每秒逻辑读 达到 7G
    buffer gets 较高 存在优化的SQL包括:
    SQL ordered by Gets
    Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.
    Total Buffer Gets: 1,733,719,818
    Captured SQL account for 42.9% of Total
    Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total CPU Time (s) Elapsed Time (s) SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
    150,857,840 6 25,142,973.33 8.70 1296.33 1769.90 gmm6ktqrft6n1 select rowid, title, filep...
    57,452,737 234 245,524.52 3.31 676.45 678.49 06r32459s5kzc select rowid, ArticleID, S...
    50,264,264 2 25,132,132.00 2.90 311.70 329.90 731rq4a5rd9by select rowid, title, filep...
    28,441,522 2 14,220,761.00 1.64 310.11 570.12 bxa7c0y5p6smg select rowid, title, filep...
    28,440,949 2 14,220,474.50 1.64 279.11 464.68 68pwkvkgs7taj select rowid, title, filep...
    28,433,242 2 14,216,621.00 1.64 234.45 391.91 f442cdh9hp6sk select rowid, title, filep...
    粗略看 可能是因为 希望执行计划准确 而没有去绑定变量
    这里考虑到 无法修改SQL 语句, 但是 有没有想过 通过其他手段(不修改语句 添加hint)而 改善其执行计划?
    Segments by Logical Reads
    Total Logical Reads: 1,733,719,818
    Captured Segments account for 98.8% of Total
    Owner Tablespace Name Object Name Subobject Name Obj. Type Logical Reads %Total
    JSCMS JSCMS INFO_KEYWORD INDEX 1,159,873,824 66.90
    JSCMS JSCMS PKKEY_ARTICLE INDEX 215,263,104 12.42
    JSCMS JSCMS ARTICLE SYS_P76 TABLE PARTITION 198,657,088 11.46
    逻辑较高的 segment 包括 INFO_KEYWORD 和 PKKEY_ARTICLE 把他们 移动到 block size的 非标准表空间上确实可以一定程度缓解 对这个segment 上buffer的交叉访问争用 , 但是 使用 16KB的block size意味着 数据行的分布更为集中 , 这可能导致段内buffer的争用加剧 。
    建议:
    1. 考虑在 不修改SQL文本 的情况下 调优SQL ,包括使用SQL Profile等技术
    2. 考试使用 global hash index ,当然hash index不是一定能缓解cbc
    3. 内存允许的话 可以吧 一个索引 keep到 db cache keep pool中(而非16k pool),另一个使用 4k pool
    一些Cache buffer chains相关的master Notes:
    ODM FINDING:
    Cache Buffers Chains Latch waits are caused by contention where multiple sessions waiting to read the same block.
    Typical solutions are:-
    o Look for SQL that accesses the blocks in question and determine if the repeated reads are necessary.
    o Check for suboptimal SQL (this is the most common cause of the events) - look at the execution plan for the
    SQL being run and try to reduce the gets per executions which will minimise the number of blocks being accessed
    and therefore reduce the chances of multiple sessions contending for the same block
    Note 34405.1 WAITEVENT: "buffer busy waits" Reference Note
    @Note 42152.1 LATCH: CACHE BUFFERS CHAINS
    Note 155971.1 Ext/Pub Resolving Intense and "Random" Buffer Busy Wait Performance Problems:
    Note 163424.1 Ext/Pub How To Identify a Hot Block Within The Database Buffer Cache.:
    These queries would benefit from tuning. They either do too much buffer gets (logical reads) per execution or just do a lot of buffer gets. Tuning these queries would lower the load on the CPU and reduce the CPU wait time. Check if all objects in these queries have representative and up to date stats present. Also check if all the indexes are present.
    If a query does not do an excessive amount of gets for 1 run but when the query runs often, then lowering the amount of buffer gets per run with for example 10% will have a big impact overall.
    To see the full SQL open the html AWR report and select SQL Statistics in the Main Report section, then select SQL ordered by Gets clicking on the SQL id then gives the complete statement.
    "Cache Buffers Chains Latch waits are caused by contention where multiple sessions waiting to read the same block.
    那么与
    read by others session 这个等待事件有什么区别?"
    通俗的说 (不深究技术细节)
    CBC latch 是 大家都要逻辑读取同一个块,对于Consistent Read会使用kcbgtcr函数, kcbgtcr 函数可能使用2中模式去get cache buffer chains, 分别是 kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl 和 kcbgtcr: kslbegin shared, 在上述AWR中 主要是 kslbegin excl
    “我们一般认为Latch结构是Mostly exclusive access的,也就是极少会有共享访问闩的机会。但Oracle一般对外宣称读取数据时服务进程是以共享模式使用cache buffers chains闩,这就造成了许多人误以为读读是不会出现latch: cache buffers chains争用的。
    但是实际上查询语句大部分情况下仍需要以exclusive模式持有该类子闩(有时会以SHARED模式持有,这取决于读取时是使用kcbgtcr: kslbegin shared还是kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl;kcbgtcr是Oracle rdbms中重要的获取一致性读的函数,其含义为Kernal Cache Buffer GeT Cosistents Read,显然该函数存在两种获取cache buffers chains的方式即kslbegin shared和excl。与之相对应的是kcbgcur: kslbegin,kcbgcur的含义为Kernel Cache Buffer Get Current,该函数用以获取当前块以便修改,也就是”写”;很显然kcbgcur: kslbegin函数只有以excl排他方式持有child cache buffers chains latch的必要),原因在于虽然是查询语句但同样需要修改buffer header结构,譬如修改tch抢手度、holder list的hash变量us_nxt、us_prv以及waiter list的hash变量wa_prv、wa_nxt等。换而言之读读是会引起Latch free:cache buffers chains等待的,而非许多人认为的仅有读写、写写会导致缓存链闩争用。”
    FROM http://www.oracledatabase12g.com/archives/oracle%E9%97%A9latch-cache-buffers-chains.html
    cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl 0 28,633,140 27,628,172
    cache buffers chains kcbrls: kslbegin 0 27,162,431 28,455,820
    cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 1,969 2,664
    read by others session 是这个block不在缓存(buffer cache)中,大家都想要访问这个block,但是只需要一个人去做物理读取到Buffer cache, 其他人在 有一个人去做physical read 的情况下非空闲(non-idle wait)等待即可。

  • Possible excess consumption of RAM in Xfce 4.10

    For a few days I have noticed that every time I boot ArchLinux with Xfce 4.10 is consuming me just charge significantly RAM desktop completely that...  I do not remember exactly how much memory consumed when you install Xfce, but now nothing more I load consumes about 400Mb ram. previously had few applets on the top panel monitoring such as CPU, transfers from the network interface and other things, delete them all!. remove all my settings and restart Xfce to default settings, with all this, Xfce is significant consimiendo ram.
    As I said before, I do not remember how much memory consumed when you install Xfce, but I think those 363 Mb of RAM (500Mb previously over before deleting applets) is excessive memory consumption. I have Ubuntu 13.04 on another hard drive and surprisingly Unity consumes me 280MB of ram ... I can not believe that Xfce consume more ram to Unity.
    Do you know of any documentation or similar for Xfce and make optimize use less RAM? Is it possible to be a bug reported?
    Thanks in advance ...

    karol wrote:
    Could you please post the output of
    free -m
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/FA … _my_RAM.3F
    ArchLinux + Xfce:
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 1005 555 450 0 31 138
    -/+ buffers/cache: 384 621
    Swap: 972 0 972
    Fedora 18 + Xfce:
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 1003 376 627 0 18 138
    -/+ buffers/cache: 219 783
    Swap: 2015 0 2015

  • Help Needed in blocing excess quantity in production module

    Dear All,
    My client wants to block excess issue of raw materials or excess receipt of finished goods in the Production module.
    Can someone suggest me a solution for this?
    Regards,
    Bharath S
    Edited by: Bharath Kumar on Nov 4, 2010 11:04 AM

    Dear Mr. Jimmy,
    Thanks for the reply. I tried writing the query in the stored procedure but its not working.
    It would be grateful if someone can send me the query for this to put in the Transaction Notification.
    Regards,
    Bharath S

  • How to draw a point without double buffering?

    Hello all,
    I am drawing points as small red circles, but they are a bit ugly without double buffering. Am I able to draw the points to be nice? I mean not to draw them as just circles, but some special circle with light border that will looks much more nicer?
    Or what radius and position of the circle must be to be a nice small circle containing only 5 pixels? (upper, lower, right, left, middle)
    ps - they are ugly in the way of having a strange dot on the left side

    I use this method:
        private static final float POINT_RADIUS = 2f;
        private static final float POINT_DIAMETER = POINT_RADIUS * 2;
    private void drawPoint(float x, float y, Color c) {
            Ellipse2D point = new Ellipse2D.Float(x - POINT_RADIUS, -y
                    - POINT_RADIUS, POINT_DIAMETER, POINT_DIAMETER);
            graphics.setStroke(new BasicStroke(0.2f));
            graphics.fill(point);
    // and points looks like this:
       ***

  • How do we cope with the wretched performance of iphone4 with IOS 7.0.2. Before update it was working fine. Since, the text entry has 4 to 10 seconds buffered lag, and the impresssion is that the processor is overtaxed. Not at all acceptable for a compulso

    Since compelled to take the IOS 7.0.2 "upgrade" I experience 4 - 10 second delays in text inputting. The keystrokes are buffered then displayed. Other signs suggest the processor is under way too much load.
    I haev reduced the concurrent apps to 1. turned off location services, most notifications etc etc .
    It occurs like this on Twitter and FB, and IM and simple text messages.
    Clearly the software is too processor intensive for iPhone 4
    Will this be addressed?
    Are there more configurations I acn adopt to manage the overload?
    I think I ve turned everything off that I can without shutting down the 3G fundctions WiFi and phone.
    My smartphone has been rendered dumb by the Apple Core
    Needs fixing or I'll shop for a Samsung neXt

    reset all settings
    settings-general-reset-reset all settings
    now reconnect to wifi
    settings- wifi- click network name- enter password - join
    if issue persist back up and restore as new via iTunes
    Peace, Clyde

Maybe you are looking for