EXCHANGE 2010 (cfexchange and IMAP)

First, let me say that I would have loved if this post was about how I was working with cfexchange and Exchange Server 2010, but its not, because cfexchange does not work with Exchange 2010 and never has.  See Bug report 82576 and vote!
Now, since I was not able to use cfexchange, I wrote an email parsing script using CFIMAP that was working until recently.  About the same time, I upgraded Exchange to SP1, I also upgraded CF9 to CF9.01.  Now, I am unable to use the GETHEADERSONLY or GETALL actions of CFIMAP.  I consistently get the following error:
The cause of this exception was: javax.mail.MessagingException: Unable to load BODYSTRUCTURE.
Does anyone else have a similar environment to test to see if CF9 or 9.01 works with CFIMAP on Exchange 2010 SP1?  Your input would be much appreciated.
--Sean

I know this is an old question, but perhaps this will help someone else down the line...  I've run into this problem when accessing GMail using CFIMAP.
The problem is caused by messages that have other messages attached as files.  In GMail, these get converted to "noname.eml" attachments that can only be opened if you download them.
You can confirm this by quarantining all of the inbox files in a separate folder, moving only a couple known-attachment-free messages into the inbox and re-running your script. 
Once you remove all messages that have other messages attached, you should have no more trouble

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2010 SP1 and SP2 are no longer supported.

    Exchange 2010 SP3 is the minimal version that should be installed on your Exchange Servers and just may contain the fixes you need to solve your issue.
    Support for 2010 SP1 and SP2 has ended.
    Before posting a question, please ensure you are running at least 2010 SP3.
    For more details:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2014/04/09/end-of-exchange-2010-sp2-support.aspx
    Twitter!:
    Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

    Exchange 2010 SP3 is the minimal version that should be installed on your Exchange Servers and just may contain the fixes you need to solve your issue.
    Support for 2010 SP1 and SP2 has ended.
    Before posting a question, please ensure you are running at least 2010 SP3.
    For more details:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2014/04/09/end-of-exchange-2010-sp2-support.aspx
    Twitter!:
    Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • After Exchange 2010 SP3 and rollup 4 update conditional formatting causes messages not to appear in Outlook 2010

    Hi,
    after updating to exchange 2010 sp 3 from sp 2 and also updating to rollup 4, users who use conditional formatting cannot see new message unless they close and reopen Outlook.
    If you decide to change the font colour for unread messages, the messages do not appear in Outlook but a pop up indicates that a new message has arrived.
    If you reopen Outlook, the unread messasge appears.
    remove the conditional formatting and no issue with viewing unread messages as they arrive.
    running Outook version 14.0.7106.5003
    is this a known issue?  a user who never used conditional formatting will experience this right away.
    Thanks,
    rudif

    Hi rudif,
    If the issue only happens to users who use conditional formatting and OWA can work well for all mailbox, I think the issue should be in client side.
    Please try to reset View then set the conditional formatting back to have a try. If the issue continues, please try to recreate the Outlook profile to check whether the issue persists. Also try restarting Outlook in Safe mode by running
    Outlook /safe switch.
    Thanks,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 EMC and EMS errors - BLOCKED by software restriction

    EMC has this message:
    Initialization failed "Execution calling 'GetSteppablePipeline" with "1" arguement: File D:\program files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\RemoteScripts\ConsoleInitialize.ps1 cannot be loaded because its execution is blocked
    by software restriction policies" 
    EMS has this error:
    "There were errors in loading the format data file: D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1x
    ml, , D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1xml : File skipped because of the following validation exception: File D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1xml cannot be loaded because its execution is
    blocked by software restriction policies. For more information, contact your system administrator."
    All other powershell scripts work just fine.  It is not the execution policy.  That is set properly.  Authenticode returns valid on the files. There are no settings it GPO to control or cause this. Email working fine.  It just started
    after a reboot for updates.  Any other thoughts before I spend $500 for a call?
    Server2008 Standard SP2
    Update Rollup 4 v2 for Exchange Server 2010 SP2
    Thank you

    The long and short of it was Microsoft Certificates didn't update and were expired. I was not given a reason why this happened but the final solution after Microsoft spent 2 weeks on this was to first reinstall Exchange Service Pack 3, reboot. Install
    update rollup 8, and reboot.  This fixed the EMC but not the shell.  Then they reinstalled the rollup 8 again and one more reboot.  Everything now works.  I'd say with all the other little tweaks they looked at as possible suspect and "other
    things" they fixed in their efforts to solve this, I defiantly got my money's worth.  Despite not really knowing what really caused the issue in the first place

  • Calendar Sharing between 2 organisation Exchange 2010 SP3 and Exchange online with Federation Trust.

    Hi...
     Our company is running Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Standart would like to have Shared calendar with organisation running with Exchange online.
     We made a Federation trust between organisations and I checked that one certificate was installed and the rule for their domain was created. but when I try to share my calendar I always receive.
    "Calendar sharing is not available with the following contacts because of permission settings on your network."
    Name I took from GAL or input manually and always same. Forgot to mention that we migrated from Exchange 2003 to 2010 SP3 and all old exchange servers I removed. I tried everything that I know and read and nothing helped.
    Hope for your support.
    Thank you.

    1)I deleted everything and made step by step as indicated in your articles.
    2) recreated organisation relationship:
    RunspaceId            : xxxxxxxxxx
    DomainNames           : {xxxxxxx.microsoftonline.com, xxxxxxxxx.onmicrosoft.com, xxxxxxx.com}
    FreeBusyAccessEnabled : True
    FreeBusyAccessLevel   : LimitedDetails
    FreeBusyAccessScope   :
    MailboxMoveEnabled    : False
    DeliveryReportEnabled : False
    MailTipsAccessEnabled : False
    MailTipsAccessLevel   : None
    MailTipsAccessScope   :
    TargetApplicationUri  : outlook.com
    TargetSharingEpr      :
    TargetOwaURL          :
    TargetAutodiscoverEpr : https://pod12312.outlook.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc/WSSecurity
    OrganizationContact   :
    Enabled               : True
    ArchiveAccessEnabled  : False
    AdminDisplayName      :
    ExchangeVersion       : 0.10 (14.0.100.0)
    Name                  : xxx
    DistinguishedName     : CN=xxx,CN=Federation,CN=uxx,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=uxxx,DC=com
    Identity              : Lxx
    Guid                  : a8xxx
    ObjectCategory        : upxxs.com/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Fed-Sharing-Relationship
    ObjectClass           : {top, msExchFedSharingRelationship}
    WhenChanged           : 27/01/2015 3:23:47 PM
    WhenCreated           : 26/01/2015 9:41:39 AM
    WhenChangedUTC        : 27/01/2015 8:23:47 PM
    WhenCreatedUTC        : 26/01/2015 2:41:39 PM
    OrganizationId        :
    OriginatingServer     : xxx.upxxxns.com
    IsValid               : True
    3. Configured Sharing Policies:
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-SharingPolicy
    Name                      Domains                                  Enabled    Default
    Default Sharing Policy    {*:CalendarSharingFreeBusySimple}        True       False
    Lxxx                              {lxxx.com:CalendarSharingFreeBusy...     True       True
    added my mail box to sharing policy but in the end receive same error 
    Calendar sharing is not available with the following contacts because of permission settings on your network.
    In EventViewer everything seems to be fine....
    No errors on policy creation... How can be checked this permission
    settings on your network they are on exchange on in DC ? 

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 and UR6 Query - Order of Install

    hi,
    I need to update my Exchange 2010 SP2 Servers to SP3 and Update Rollup 6.
    Can someone confirm the update order for me?
    I have 5 servers;
    Live Data Centre:
    2 x HUB / CAB (Using Windows NLB)
    2 x Mailbox (DAG)
    Disaster Recovery:
    1 x Multi-Role Server (CAS / HUB and Mailbox) - this is also Part of the DAG
    Two Questions:
    1.) What is the Order in which I install SP3 on these Servers? Should it be Live Data Centre: HUB / CAS, Mailbox Servers and THEN the Multi-Role Server at DR?
    2.) When Upgrading each server, should I do SP3, reboot, check and THEN install Update Rollup 6 - or should I upgrade all Servers to SP3 and then start the process again to get to Update Rollup 6?
    Thanks in advance for your help with this query.
    Regards,
    Adam

    1) Internet facing CAS first in each AD site. Order: CAS> HUB> UM> MBX
    2) Personally, I would install SP3, reboot, then install SP6, but its really up to you.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb629560(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Upgrade Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010 SP1, Exchange 2010 SP2, or Exchange 2010 SP3
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Updated: Event ID 1006 - Can not delete Mails in OWA after installing SP1 (Exchange 2010) = Outlook and OWA Light are OK

    Hi all,
    4 Exchange Servers (2 DB + 2 CAS NLB Cluster) all Exchange 2010 SP1
    Outlook work fine.
    If I delete a message in OWA i became the following errors:
    Internet Explorer:
    Die Netzwerkverbindung ist nicht verfügbar. Wenn das Problem weiterhin auftritt, wenden Sie sich mit folgendem HTTP-Statuscode an den Helpdesk: 0.
    Translation: The networkconnection is not available. If it happens again, contact the helpdesk with HTTP statuscode 0
    Firefox:
    Die Netzwerkverbindung ist nicht verfügbar. Wenn das Problem weiterhin auftritt, wenden Sie sich mit folgendem HTTP-Statuscode an den Helpdesk: 302.
    Translation: The networkconnection is not available. If it happens again, contact the helpdesk with HTTP statuscode 302
    Event ID 1006 MSExchange Mailbox Replication
    Fehler: MapiExceptionNetworkError: Unable to make connection to the server. (hr=0x80040115, ec=-2147221227)
    Before SP1 it worked fine.
    Can somebody help me ?
    Kind regards Andy

    Hi,
    First, I would like to confirm the following questions:
    1. Does the issue occur on certain user mailbox via OWA or each user mailbox?
    2. Which OWA folder’s email cannot be deleted, Inbox, Sent Items or each folder?
    3. Which version of operating system is installed on the client machine, Windows XP, Windows Vista or Windows 7?
    At this stage, I suggest you temporarily disable firewall and anti-spam for a test. If the emails still cannot be removed via OWA, please refer to the following article
    and use isinteg tool to check and repair Information Store.
    Description of the Isinteg utility
    Thanks.
    Novak Wu-MSFT

  • Renew SSL Certificate for for two Exchange 2010 Server and the new rules.

    I find DigitCert's website always helpful with cert questions.They've got a pretty helpful page here: https://www.digicert.com/internal-names.htmIt looks like they've got a tool for Exchange, but I've not used it myself, so can't say if it works or how well: https://www.digicert.com/internal-domain-name-tool.htmI bet Microsoft have something on their website too that helps with this sort of question.I'd say you register a completely new domain and use that for public facing and internal servers. Or you could just create a sub domain of an existing one, i.e. subdomain.mydomain.com and use that, i.e. public_exchange.subdomain.mydomain.com and internal_exchange.subdomain.mydomain.com.

    Hi there , 
    My exchange 2010 Server Certificate is about to expire and i am going to renew it but according to the new rules for SSL Certificate Issuing we can not include our Local Servers Names and Local FQDN such as myserver.contoso.local, my issue is that i have 2 exchange servers one is internet-facing Server (where the certificate is initiated and installed) and one is non-internet-facing Exchange server.
    if i am going to renew my certificate with public only name, I have to create a split Domain that reflects my external links to the internal Users, what shall i do for the non-internet-facing server? do i need to create another record in my split DNS Server and add it to my Certificate Request ? 
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

  • Integration b/w Exchange 2010 SP2 and Exchange 9.1.1.7 connector

    Has any succesfully integrated exchange 2010 sp2 with 9.1.1.7 conncetor ..
    Sp2 is not in the certifcation list in the connector documentation .. just want to check if any one has done this before ..
    Thanks

    Hi Sembee,
    We did this already.
    We got it working now after doing above but with the shell.
    First we confirmed if the mailbox is disabled with the following command: Get-MailboxStatistics -Database MBD01 | Where { $_.DisconnectReason -eq "Disabled" } | Format-List LegacyDN, DisplayName, MailboxGUID, DisconnectReason
    It did show as disabled but when we try to enable it we got the following: This task does not support recipients of this type.
    So we disabled the mailbox in the shell, enable it again and it was fine.
    Get-MailboxStatistics -Database MBD01 | Where { $_.DisconnectReason -eq "Disabled" } | Format-List LegacyDN, DisplayName, MailboxGUID, DisconnectReason helped us, cause in the EMC exchange showed the user as enabled.
    Thanks

  • Exchange 2010 sp3 and WSUS

    I have a DAG environment with Exchange 2010.  last week I moved from sp2 RU6 to sp3 rtm. I then manually installed RU6 for sp3. the correct verison numbers are being displayed in the EMC under Help>About Exchange Server 2010 (it shows version 14.03.0195.001) I
    verified the version numbers on this site -
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/240.exchange-server-and-update-rollups-build-numbers.aspx
    My question is, in WSUS, it shows that all my servers with exchange on  them, (a management server with the EMC only, 2 exchange servers for the DB, a CAS server and a DR exchange server) need SP3 RU2. 
    1) Will this disrupt the current SP3 RU6 installation?
    2) Would it be better to just decline the SP3 RU2 update in WSUS? 
    3)Should I just proceed with the installation and see what happens?
    If I am on the wrong forum, please let me know.
    thanks
    Ian 
    Ian

    Hi
    I prefer doing rollups by downloading the file and installing it on the server from an elevated prompt. 
    Deploying it with WSUS always leaves room for error.
    Rather manually download the file and plan the installation.
    Hope this helps. Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 and meeting forward notification options

    I'm having an issue with meeting forward notifications in Exchange 2010 SP3. I'm working on an integration project with an existing system using the EWS Managed API. Part of this system is handling forward notifications and responses. However, we've hit
    an issue regarding the way forwards are generated by Exchange.
    In short, when a meeting request is forwarded to an external address (could be an Exchange server outside of our domain, gmail, or anything, really), the notification they receive places the meeting owner in the "sent representing" field, not the
    person who actually sent the forward. As a result, any responses from the forward recipient will go directly back to the organizer, and the user who forwarded the request may not even be visible. We do not want this to happen. We'd prefer that the forward
    show the person who actually sent it as the sender, and as a result, the response should go directly back to them, not the organizer.
    Is this possible, either through settings or flags on the Appointment object itself or through some additional configuration options in Exchange? Installing a third-party transport agent (even one that we write) is probably out of the question.

    What if you "Forward as iCalendar"
    Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on www.exchangequery.com

  • Securing publishing exchange 2010 OWA and ActiveSync with WAP 2012

    Hello,
    my client have the following environment:
    Exchange 2010 sp3
    AD 2003
    we want to secure activesync and owa by using reverse proxy. TMG/UAG life ends 2015, then we study WAP 2012 and ADFS 3.0. the difficulties is there is not enough experience feedback, specially for this environnement.
    Is there any incompatibility ?
    do you know good articles and blogs which address this issue ?
    Thanks in advance

    Are any other options available since posting in June 2014?  Specifically for securing ActiveSync connections from smartphones on the Internet.  We are running Exchange 2010 in AD 2008  
    TMG has already transitioned from mainstream to extended support.  Not only is there less support now, to my understanding there is still a licensing cost for this product.  Paying for a product at EOL seems inadvisable.
    Web Access Protocol (WAP) looked like the right choice, but to secure communications from domain users on unknown devices over the Internet requires Exchange 2013 which is "claims aware".  Exchange 2010 is not and what we are left with is
    configuring WAP in pass-thru mode, allowing unauthenticated Internet traffic into our internal network where the Exchange CAS server is. 
    Is there any Microsoft solution to authenticate the user before allowing the user's device to connect to our CAS server on our internal network.

  • Exchange 2010 OWA and ASA5510 - Wrong URL?

    I'm in the final steps of migrating my customer's Exchange server from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010.  I've got all the mailboxes moved and am testing the OWA access.  Under Exchange 2003, the internal/external users were able to access OWA thru the following URL:
    http://mail.mycustomer.org/exchange
    It would pop up a login box, they'd put in their domain info and get connected to their mailbox.
    After migrating to Exchange 2010, the user had to change the URL to httpS://mail.mycustomer.org/exchange or httpS://mail.mycustomer.org/owa, but it worked internally.  When I test it externally, I get the following page:
    https://mail.mycustomer.org/+CSCOE+/wrong_url.html
    I  have next to no experience with Cisco devices, management, and/or maintenance, but what I've found in my research points to an issue w/ our ASA5510 and the port 443 required by the SSL connection to the Exchange server.  Any help to resolve this issue so that my external users will be able to access OWA would be greatly appreciated.  Thanks.

    Hi,
    Can you check the output of the following commands
    show run http
    show run webvpn
    These are basically the 2 services that utilize the port TCP/443 port on the ASA.
    The first commands output will show some settings related to the ASDM which is the GUI for the ASA management. The second command output will show settings related to the SSL VPN.
    Both of these services can be modified to use some other port than TCP/443 which would leave the port free for your server.
    I assume that you only have one public IP address at your disposal which is configured on the ASA interface and you have no extra public IP address? Otherwise this should be no problem at all.
    Naturally if you change the port on ASDM or SSL VPN it will cause some inconvinience for users of those services. Ofcourse you have the option to map the local TCP/443 port of the server to some other public port like TCP/444 but again this might cause inconvinience to the users also.
    - Jouni

  • Exchange 2010 policy and Mail

    Just pulled down the 10061 build.  Before attempting to add my work email account to the unit I update the mail and calendar apps to avoid the known double letter issue.  When I attempt to add my work account (Exchange 2010 via ActiveSync) I
    get a prompt "Make my PC more secure".  Totally expected since we have some security policy setting on our Exchange server.  Clicking on Enforce these policies doesn't seem to do anything.  The box may pop up one or two more times
    but mail never syncs.

    i have a similar issue, except the 'make my pc more secure' prompt sometimes appears 3 or 4 times and appears everytime i turn on the computer. I also have added a couple of work email accounts which have security policies. Very annoying. Not sure if it's
    related but i also keep geeting uac popups asking if i want to allow 'settings' to change my computer. This morning i got about 20 of these.

  • Exchange 2013 POP3 and IMAP connectivity issues 0x800CCC0F

    Hi all,
    there's an Exchange 2013 server running without problems during "regular" use, but when it comes to POP3 and/or IMAP (we really need that for some systems), everything is fine until there's a message with an attachment of about 100kb or more.
    We can poll messages with smaller attachments without problem, but bigger sizes won't work.
    So for testing I tried POP3 within Outlook Express, it gives Error 0x800CCC0F
    Telnet to TCP110 simply breaks up the connection when I try "retr"
    IMAP shows those messages as "to be deleted", but they are accesible within OWA.
    Test-PopConnectivity (also for IMAP) runs smoothly and successfully.
    Firewall is opened for all connections.
    Problem is and has always been there. The server is updated to the newest SP/updates.
    I tried both 110/143 and corresponding SSL - no difference.
    Pop3 and Imap logging shows no errors
    There's Trend Micro Messaging Security installed, but has been disabled for testing - no difference. (Issue has been there before installation of TM)
    So, any ideas how to fix this? I'd appreciate...
    Thanks in advance,
    Robert

    Hello,
    Take a network trace on both ends to see if there are any devices like firewalls drop the package.
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=4865
    Thanks,
    Simon Wu
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for