Exchange 2010 cross mailbox database search

Hi there,
I have a customer who has an interesting scenario. They have an exchange 2010 server with 3 mailbox databases. They want to do a search for a text string across all databases which is reasonably straight forward but they also want to take that search back
in time and do a search across the databases as they were at points in time in the past (1 year and 2 years ago). They have backups to recover and we are thinking that we can recover the databases at the points in time required but we're unsure whether the
search works across recovered databases.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this or advise on how this might be achieved?
Thanks,
Rich

Assuming you're aware of the concepts surrounding Microsoft's recommendation to use Exchange Native Data Protection, and you're needing to search beyond what is currently protected.  Otherwise, just use that.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876874(v=exchg.150).aspx#ENDP
So here's the issue with your request:  Exchange Search uses the indexes, which would either need to be restored or re-built after a restore.  so you'd need to do your search, and repeatedly mount restored databases, probably in an isolated environment
since i'd assume you'll want to reattach restored mailboxes to existing users, ensuring the index is in good shape and re-do your search.  Sounds like a huge PITA.  Does your backup software offer the functionality you're looking for?  Microsoft's
DPM software only offers per-mailbox restores, but perhaps you've got something more sophisticated.
This is all complicated, which is why Microsoft recommends to use NDP.
Mike Crowley | MVP
My Blog --
Baseline Technologies

Similar Messages

  • What is the Exchange 2010 maximum mailbox database size that is support by MS in a single DAG environment?

    My Exchange setup:
    Exchange 2010 Enterprise
    2 mailbox servers
    2 CAS, 2 HT
    12 mailbox databases. The total of all databases combine is about 2TB. The largest mailbox databases are 530GB, 250GB, and 196GB. Are this over the supported recommendations?
    bl

    2TB, look at the second article but best practice 200GB or less 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/48431bab-4049-47db-9a84-359d5123d247/what-is-the-maximum-supported-database-size-in-exchange-2010-
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/f96892b3-8e2d-4eef-b64a-4cbc0097396d/ideal-size-for-exchange-mailbox-database

  • Exchange 2010 - Moving mailbox database from exchange 2010 server to another exchange 2010 server

    Hi,
    I have a current existing exchange server running on 2008 R2. apparently the partition that holds the mailbox database is getting full and i need to move some user mailboxes to another environment ( exchange 2010 running on 2008 R2). i transferred some users
    successfully to the new location, but am not able to transfer the rest. I am getting the errors:
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:00
    Erastus XXXXX
    Failed
    Error:
    The queue in 'MBX2010_STAFF' database already contains a move request for 'Erastus XXXXX', while AD reports the mailbox as not being moved. It is possible that someone created this move request recently, while targeting a different domain controller, and AD
    replication did not yet occur. You can examine this move request by running 'Get-MoveRequestStatistics -MoveRequestQueue 'MBX2010_STAFF' -MailboxGuid f8023bc7-9d65-4194-9f6b-10e4780558b5 -IncludeReport | fl'. If you believe this to be an abandoned move request,
    you can remove it by running 'Remove-MoveRequest -MoveRequestQueue 'MBX2010_STAFF' -MailboxGuid f8023bc7-9d65-4194-9f6b-10e4780558b5'.
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    'xxxxxxxx.co.ke/Training Department/XXXXXXX/XXXXXXX/Erastus XXXXX' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'OFFICE_STAFF_MB_DB' -BadItemLimit '0'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:00
    AND
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:01
    George XXXXX
    Failed
    Error:
    Service 'net.tcp://win-u5bjh2oamaa.xxxxxxxxx.co.ke/Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService' encountered an exception. Error: MapiExceptionNoAccess: Unable to open message store. (hr=0x80070005, ec=-2147024891)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 18969   EcDoRpcExt2 called [length=207]
        Lid: 27161   EcDoRpcExt2 returned [ec=0x80070005][length=202][latency=0]
        Lid: 32881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 50035 
        Lid: 64625   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 1494    ---- Remote Context Beg ----
        Lid: 26426   ROP: ropLogon [254]
        Lid: 56503 
        Lid: 12716   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 20794 
        Lid: 28474   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 22330   dwParam: 0x0        Msg: 14.01.0270.001:CPLSERVER
        Lid: 1750    ---- Remote Context End ----
        Lid: 23354   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25913 
        Lid: 21817   ROP Failure: 0x80070005
        Lid: 26297 
        Lid: 16585   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 32441 
        Lid: 1706    StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 24761 
        Lid: 20665   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25785 
        Lid: 29881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
    Exception details: MapiExceptionNoAccess (80070005): MapiExceptionNoAccess: Unable to open message store. (hr=0x80070005, ec=-2147024891)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 18969   EcDoRpcExt2 called [length=207]
        Lid: 27161   EcDoRpcExt2 returned [ec=0x80070005][length=202][latency=0]
        Lid: 32881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 50035 
        Lid: 64625   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 1494    ---- Remote Context Beg ----
        Lid: 26426   ROP: ropLogon [254]
        Lid: 56503 
        Lid: 12716   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 20794 
        Lid: 28474   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 22330   dwParam: 0x0        Msg: 14.01.0270.001:CPLSERVER
        Lid: 1750    ---- Remote Context End ----
        Lid: 23354   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25913 
        Lid: 21817   ROP Failure: 0x80070005
        Lid: 26297 
        Lid: 16585   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 32441 
        Lid: 1706    StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 24761 
        Lid: 20665   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25785 
        Lid: 29881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    'xxxxxxxxxx.co.ke/Training Department/xxxxxx/xxxxxxx/George xxxxxxx' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'OFFICE_STAFF_MB_DB' -BadItemLimit '0'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:01
    I have all the proper rights.
    YOUR ASSISTANCE WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED. THANX :)

    0x80070005 is pretty standard access denied entries.  I would start digging into ACLs on a handful
    of mailboxes.
    Is there another Admin that can give it a shot to test their permissions vs yours?
    - If you find my post to be helpful, or the answer, please mark it appropriately. Thank you.
    Chris Ream

  • Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 cross forest simultaneous mailbox move limits

    Hi All, 
    I am testing the throughput of mailbox moves from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 cross forest. Single mailbox moves seem to be quite fast and I am not concerned about network, disk IO or server resource limitations, however I have not tested multiple simultaneous
    mailbox moves to determine what the Exchange limitations are. If anyone could identify the limitations of the items below it would be much appreciated: 
    Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per database
    Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per Mailbox server
    Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per CAS server
    Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per database
    Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per Mailbox server
    Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per CAS server
    Any other Exchange 2007 or 2010 hard coded limits
    Thanks in advance. 
    Michael.

    My usual answer to this question is that Microsoft set these limits for a reason.  Increasing them may not offer you much in the way of benefits if you end up slamming the server.  I generally recommend that you leave them alone.
    I have had occasional opportunities to change these constraints, most notably back during a migration to Exchange 2003 and international mailbox moves (Asia to U.S.) where the limiting factor was network latency.  I was able to increase the number of
    concurrent threads to 16 from the default 2 and there was still available bandwidth because the process was limited by the latency. 
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes - allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms

    Hi,
    we are facing weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes
    it allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms.Sometime we are not getting acceptance or declined mail but and we could see our meetings has been booked at slot.
    for e.g.
    User A booked room1 with weekly recurrence for time 4pm to 5pm., and User B made his  booking other day,without realizing that user A meeting is exists.
    Neither of user A nor user B got declined/rejected emails.
    please sahre guidelines if anyone known to this issue.
    Note - Allow Conflict booking is disabled already :) but still have issue
    Thanks,
    NPratik

    Hi,
    Just add more in this issue, following testing is done.
    referring results and conclusion, you will get better view on issue 
    ====================
    Test Case - 1
    User OnCloud/O365 - Pratik Nimbalkar
    Email ID - [email protected]
    ( same as UPN)
    Room Booking Scenario - Book Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - Accepted
    Room Booking Scenario for same slot- ReBook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - Declined
    Conclusion = working fine
    ==================
    Test Case - 2
    User OnCloud/O365 - Testsm
    Email ID - [email protected]
    ( different from UPN)
    Room Booking Scenario - Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
    But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
    Room Booking Scenario for same slot- Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results -No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
    But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
    =========================
    Conclusion = There is issue with booking room and not getting response while user is
    @abc.my id.
    ======================
    Note = for all other on premise users those are having @abc.co.in
    and @abc.my it is working fine. Users are getting respective correct reply from room mailboxes.
    This issue seems with only on cloud
    @abc.my users

  • Exchange 2010: Multi-Mailbox Search causes log out

    This could well be the freakiest problem I have seen in years, or at least the more unexplainable. 
    We have the Multi-Mailbox Search feature in place, all things have been configured properly that I know of, and it has been working fine for about a year or two with several past searches done. 
    So we have a person named Jill. And we have a domain user account named Search.  Jill has been asked to be able to do multi-mailbox searches.  But it's not always her that does them, sometimes it's other people in legal, so instead of
    enabling Jill's Exchange account to have access, we created another generic user called "Search" that anybody with authority can use.  "Search" has been given the necessary setup options to enable them to do Multi-Mailbox Search. 
    The normal process is to go to OWA 2010 as the user "Search", go to Options > View All Options, then instead of Manage Myself, go to My Organization, and then to the Mail Control section.  This is where the search gets done.  The search
    is performed, the completion status shows, and this is normally where the person clicks the little link called Open, which then opens a new tab and displays the contents of the Discovery Search Mailbox 0565406545640 (or whatever it's name is) with the results
    displayed.  . 
    The problem is, for Jill whenever she does this on her computer, it opens a new tab but instead of showing the Discovery Search mailbox, it instead just gives her an OWA login screen. 
    That alone is an odd problem, however here is the big kicker.  If I remote into Jill's computer (RDP), taking over her session, if I click that same little Open link, it works properly.  To be clear, I am not logging her out and then in, or anything,
    I am simply logging in to take over her session. 
    And further on that, every time I have ever remoted into the computer to test this over the past several days, it works when I'm logged in as her.  And if I access OWA from outside the network, that also works fine. 
    I really have no idea what to say about this.  Any ideas? 

    Hi,
    Is there any error event ID in the application log?
    Thanks,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Simon Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Best way to migrate Mailboxes with all permissions Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010--cross forest

    Hi,
    Due to some Exchange and Active Directory issues (with remnants of old Ex 2003 server), we are going to migrate Exchange 2010 Mailboxes and public folders to a new Exchange 2010 Sp3 server, which is created in a new AD forest.
    I would really appreciate if someone can direct us to the best way to migrate mailboxes and PFs with their permissions, to new Ex 2010 SP3 server. We have around 30 mailboxes, and 300 GB of mailboxes data, and 200 GB of PFdata.
    Thanks in anticipation.
    Regards, David Johnson

    Hello,
    Firstly, you need to creat forest trust between two forests.
    If you want to move AD user account and mailboxes, please use ADMT and PrepareMoveRequest script.
    If you want to migrate public folder, please export data to PST file and then import pst file to new server. 
    Additional article for your reference.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/08/10/3410619.aspx
    Cara Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 CU7 Index / Search not Indexing / no result

    I Have Problemes with an Exchange 2010 Sp3 Ru7 Server. The SearchEngine does not index anything. No Database have index Data. When i went to OWA no Searchresult on Server.
    I have start the resetsearchindex etc. The Microsoft-Exchange-Troubleshooters/Operational gives no error, Mailbox Repair also no error. When i start resetsearchindex the Folder in the Database Directory ist going delete an renew. Then he create 19Files but
    nothing more happend.
    i configure Perfmon to see activity. There i see that under MSFTESQL-ExchangeCatalog the Counter ""Batches completed w/errors  1800"
    After few hours an error in Eventlog came.
    Die Exchange-Suchindizierung hat die Indizierung der Postfachdatenbank Mailbox_Database_01 (GUID = b69e081c-65d8-49a9-8a82-0cdc16333380) aufgrund eines Fehlers (Microsoft.Exchange.Msfte.BatchTimeoutException: Timeout detected for batch Database Guid:b69e081c-65d8-49a9-8a82-0cdc16333380;
    NumberOfFailedDocuments:0; ShouldIsolateError: False; SubmitTickCount:38475899; BatchKind:RetryMailbox; Number of entries:100) vorübergehend deaktiviert.
    Anyone an Idea ?
    Thanks for Help- Thomas

    Hi,
    Here are some suggestions, please try these to check result.
    Please check to see if you are using a 3rd party disk defragmenter. If you are using this type of software, stop all the 3rd party defragmentation services temporarily.
    Please check to see if the CatalogData folder is being scanned by file-level antivirus OR on-demand antivirus. If it is, reconfigure both file-level and on-demand antivirus, so it is not scanning the CatalogData folder.
    Please turn up logging to expert for MSExchange Search Indexer\Configuration and MSExchange Search Indexer\General.
    Please rebuild search catalog and check if event 110 is logged in the application log. Event 110 means the full crawl is completed successfully.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 Export Mailbox to PST using only .EDB file

    I have Exchange 2010 SP2 Update Rollup 4, SBS 2011 (which is similar to Server 2008 R2). I have recently recovered from a server crash due to a faulty RAID controller and need to recover some e-mail (and possibly contacts) from a couple of mailboxes.
    My main concern is that my old .edb file is in a old forest that is different than my current forest. Due to the length of the old internal domain name having more than 15 characters (I previously migrated using a answer file) and my current internal
    domain name is 15 characters.local they are different.
    I also dont have the log files or STM file
    With the two internal domain names being different will I still be able to follow this related topic:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/zh/exchange2010/thread/8f4eb425-72ff-4d18-abfc-5c00be7113e2
    If not please let me know which direction I should be going. I know there are third part tools that can get this done but not in the budget right now.
    Teron

    Hi,Teron,
    Cross forest export mailbox is not possible,if you have the old forest server still running you can export the mailbox in the old forest to PST file then import the pst file to your current forest.
    Otherwise you should convert the edb file to PST with thirdparty tool as the above guys said.
    Some additional information just for your reference.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/d731ac97-416b-4ff6-a4d9-861ce4345292
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvr3rdpartyappslegacy/thread/74233836-38d9-4682-81d2-7dd395066574
    Regards,
    Sharon
    Sharon Shen
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question.

  • Exchange 2010 cross subnet Dag - Errors creating DB copies in DR site

    We are running exchange 2010 standard edition in our main site with 2 mailbox servers in a DAG. I've added 2 more mailbox servers in a DR site connecting over a 20Mb fiber connection. I've tried adding one of the DR mailbox servers over to the DAG as database
    server, also tried updating copies of the database after it fails to update it.  Been working with Microsoft support on this but they have been little slow getting back with me so wanted to see if I can find anyone that has had this issue before. We've
    changed TCP global settings, they've set the Cluster setting for samesubnet and crosssubnet threshholds settings to recommended, made sure my DAG replication networks were correct and that's about it so far.  Tried running the update database
    from GUI and shell but to no avail.  Seems like it is copying the logs and database but fails at the very end.  We thought it might be backup software running so we turned that off completely.  Here are the different error messages I get..
     A source-side operation failed while performing seed operation.  error occurred whil communicating with mbx-01 (source server..)  unable to read data from transport connection..  connected host failed to respond..
    A source side operation failed performing seed operation.  An I/O error occurred while attempting to access file ..CatalogData-...ci on source server could not be opened. sys cannot find file.
    Information Store (1988) Mailbox-MBX-01:  The internal database copy (for seeding or analysis purposes) has been stopped because it was halted by the client or because the connection with the client failed.
    Any help is appreciated..
    Michael Duhon

    Hello,
    I recommend you try to restart Microsoft Exchange Replication Service to check the result.
    If the issue persists, please try to rebuild the Index for your database to check the result.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here
    Cara Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 personal archive database massive log file generation

    Exchange Server 2010 SP3 + Update Rollup 4
    Windows Server 2008 R2, all updates
    VMware ESXi 5.5
    Server config: 2 x Xeon Quad Core 2.20GHz, 16GB RAM
    We recently started using personal archives. I created a database for this purpose ("Archive Mailboxes") on the same datastore as our live mailbox database ("Live Mailboxes"). It works great except that the mailbox maintenance generates
    massive amounts of log files, over 220GB per day on average. I need to know why. The Live Mailbox database generates around 70GB of log files every day. The database sizes are: Live = 159.9GB, Archive = 196.8GB. Everything appears to be working fine, there
    are no Error events related to archiving. There are 10025 MSExchangeMailboxAssistant warning events logged every day. I have moved those mailboxes back-and-forth to temp databases (both Live and Archive mailboxes) and the 10025 events have not stopped so I'm
    reasonably certain there is no corruption. Even if there were it still doesn't make sense to me that over 100 log files are generated every single minute of the day for the Archive store. And it's not that the database isn't being fully backed up; it is, every
    day.
    Do I need to disable the 24x7 option for mailbox maintenance to stop this massive log file generation? Should I disable mailbox maintenance altogether for the Archive store? Should I enable circular logging for the Archive store (would prefer to NOT do this,
    though I am 100% certain we have great backups)? It appears to me that mailbox maintenance on the Live store takes around 12 hours to run so I'm not sure it needs the 24x7 option.
    This is perplexing. Need to find a solution. Backup storage space is being rapidly consumed.

    I'm sure it will be fine for maintenance to run only on weekends so I'll do that.
    We use Veeam B&R Enterprise 7.0.0.833. We do not run incremental backups during the day but probably could if necessary. All this is fine and dandy but it still doesn't explain why this process generates so many logs. There are a lot of posts around
    the internet from people with the same issue so it would be nice to hear something from Microsoft, even if this is expected behavior.
    Thank you for the suggestions!

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 mailbox role installation error

    Hello.
    I can't install the Mailbox role on a Windows 2008 R2 server, the first Exchange in the domain and forest (2 dcs in the domain).
    Client Access Role and Hub Transport Role installed correctly.
    Setup preparations - without an error.
    Started the Exchange 2010 SP3 Installation, which start correctly, all prerequisites are seems to be ok. When arriving on the Mailbox Roles it make this error:
    02.05.2014 13:42:46.0634] [2] [ERROR] Active Directory operation failed on <dc fqdn>. This error is not retriable. Additional information: An attempt was made to modify an object to include an attribute that is not legal for its class.
    Active directory response: 0000207D: UpdErr: DSID-0315121C, problem 6002 (OBJ_CLASS_VIOLATION), data -1731808180
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0634] [2] [ERROR] An object class violation occurred.
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0634] [2] Ending processing enable-mailbox
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] 0.  ErrorRecord: Active Directory operation failed on <dc fqdn>. This error is not retriable. Additional information: An attempt was made to modify an object to include an attribute that is not legal for its class.
    Active directory response: 0000207D: UpdErr: DSID-0315121C, problem 6002 (OBJ_CLASS_VIOLATION), data -1731808180
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] 0.  ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.ADOperationException: Active Directory operation failed on <dc fqdn>. This error is not retriable. Additional information: An attempt was made to modify an object to
    include an attribute that is not legal for its class.
    Active directory response: 0000207D: UpdErr: DSID-0315121C, problem 6002 (OBJ_CLASS_VIOLATION), data -1731808180
     ---> System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.DirectoryOperationException: An object class violation occurred.
       at System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.LdapConnection.ConstructResponse(Int32 messageId, LdapOperation operation, ResultAll resultType, TimeSpan requestTimeOut, Boolean exceptionOnTimeOut)
       at System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.LdapConnection.SendRequest(DirectoryRequest request, TimeSpan requestTimeout)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.PooledLdapConnection.SendRequest(DirectoryRequest request, LdapOperation ldapOperation, IAccountingObject budget, Nullable`1 clientSideSearchTimeout)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.ADSession.ExecuteModificationRequest(ADObject entry, DirectoryRequest request, ADObjectId originalId, Boolean emptyObjectSessionOnException)
       --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.ADSession.AnalyzeDirectoryError(PooledLdapConnection connection, DirectoryRequest request, DirectoryException de, Int32 totalRetries, Int32 retriesOnServer)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.ADSession.ExecuteModificationRequest(ADObject entry, DirectoryRequest request, ADObjectId originalId, Boolean emptyObjectSessionOnException)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.ADSession.Save(ADObject instanceToSave, IEnumerable`1 properties)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Data.Directory.Recipient.ADRecipientSession.Microsoft.Exchange.Data.IConfigDataProvider.Save(IConfigurable instance)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.SetTaskBase`1.InternalProcessRecord()
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.EnableMailbox.InternalProcessRecord()
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.Task.ProcessRecord()
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] [ERROR] The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
              if (!$RoleIsDatacenter)
                $arbUsers = @(get-user -Filter {lastname -eq "MSExchApproval 1f05a927-3be2-4fb9-aa03-b59fe3b56f4c"} -IgnoreDefaultScope -ResultSize 1);
                if ($arbUsers.Length -ne 0)
                  $mbxname = $arbUsers[0].name;
                  $mbxs = @( get-mailbox -arbitration -Filter {name -eq $mbxname} -IgnoreDefaultScope -resultSize 1 );
                  if ( $mbxs.length -eq 0)
                    $dbs = @(get-MailboxDatabase -Server:$RoleFqdnOrName -DomainController $RoleDomainController);
                    if ($dbs.Length -ne 0)
                      enable-mailbox -Arbitration -identity $arbUsers[0] -database $dbs[0].Identity;
            " was run: "Active Directory operation failed on <dc fqdn>. This error is not retriable. Additional information: An attempt was made to modify an object to include an attribute that is not legal for
    its class.
    Active directory response: 0000207D: UpdErr: DSID-0315121C, problem 6002 (OBJ_CLASS_VIOLATION), data -1731808180
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] [ERROR] Active Directory operation failed on <dc fqdn>. This error is not retriable. Additional information: An attempt was made to modify an object to include an attribute that is not legal for its class.
    Active directory response: 0000207D: UpdErr: DSID-0315121C, problem 6002 (OBJ_CLASS_VIOLATION), data -1731808180
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] [ERROR] An object class violation occurred.
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] [ERROR-REFERENCE] Id=SystemAttendantDependent___04bbd8c4a86b4d2c9403cdddf5b39579 Component=EXCHANGE14:\Current\Release\Transport\BCM\Moderated Transport
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] Setup is stopping now because of one or more critical errors.
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0649] [1] Finished executing component tasks.
    [02.05.2014 13:42:46.0712] [1] Ending processing Install-MailboxRole
    Any help would be appreciate.
    Thanks,
    Igor K.

    Hi,
    The above error may occur when the federated built-in e-mail account that links to the computer account no longer exists or the federated built-in e-mail account in the Active Directory service is corrupted.
    I recommend you follow the steps below for troubleshooting:
    1. Remove the FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042 e-mail account by using the ADSIEdit tool.
    a. Run adsiedit.msc.
    b. Locate the Default Naming Context node, and then locate to the CN=Users container.
    c. Locate and then right-click the CN=FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042 container. Then, click Delete.
    2.Rerun the Exchange Server 2010 Mailbox role setup application.
    3.Create a new federated e-mail account by using the following cmdlet:
    New-Mailbox -Arbitration -Name FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042 -UserPrincipalName
    FederatedEmail.4c1f4d8b-8179-4148-93bf-00a95fa1e042@<Default_Accepted_Domain>
    Hope it helps.
    If you need further assistance, please feel free to let me know.
    Best regards,
    Amy
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 - Disconnected Mailbox

    Hello 
    We have Exchange 2010 server. I have noticed that on one of the drives (Mailbox Data store )has very low disk space left. 
    I have done New local Move request to bunch of users but still doesn't seem to free up the free. 
    Also i have more than 100 disconnected Mailbox and quite a few of them show that its from the same database as above on the low disk space. 
    I run Remove-Mailbox -identity "John Brown" 
    and got an error 'The Operation couldn't be performed because object 'John Brow' couldn't be found on DC'
    run this cmd as well
    Get-MailboxStatistics -Database "Mailbox Database 08310xxxx | Where-Object {$_.DisconnectDate -Notlike $NULL} | FL DisplayName, DisconnectDate, MailboxGuid
    Error iam getting - Mailbox database "xx xx0 8310xxxx "doesnt exist.
    I would like to clear all the Discconnected mailbox and how can i free up the disk What can i delete?
    If any one has experience this please share. Thank you 
    Cheers 
    KB

    Hi Ed 
    First command i run is 
    Get-MailboxStatistics -Database "Standard Users" | Where-Object {$_.DisconnectDate -Notlike $NULL} | FL DisplayName, DisconnectDate, MailboxGuid
    and i got the list of users and the DisconnectedDate and MailboxGuid 
    Second command i run is this 
    Remove-Mailbox -StoreMailboxIdentity b55f25e1-09a3-4d04-a5de-f8fa6e083707 -Database "Standard Users"
    and it returned with error 
    Mailbox "b55f25e1-09a3-4d04-a5de-f8fa6e083707" doesn't exist on database "Standard Users".
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [Remove-Mailbox], ManagementObjectNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 63512F0D,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.RemoveMailbox
    Thank you 
    KB
    Hi,
    Please remove the disconnected mailbox by the following steps:
    Get-MailboxDatabase | Get-MailboxStatistics | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | fl DisplayName,MailboxGuid,Database,DisconnectReason
    If the MailboxState is Disabled for this disconnected mailbox, we can run the following command to delete it:
    Remove-StoreMailbox -Database "Standard Users" -Identity "b55f25e1-09a3-4d04-a5de-f8fa6e083707" -MailboxState Disabled
    If it is SoftDeleted, please run:
    Remove-StoreMailbox -Database "Standard Users" -Identity "b55f25e1-09a3-4d04-a5de-f8fa6e083707" -MailboxState SoftDeleted
    Regards,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 - New-Mailbox - A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument '-PrimarySmtpAddress'.

    Hi,
    I am currently writing a powershell script that utilizes the new-mailbox command of EMS to create a shared mailbox.
    I am connecting to EMS via a remote PSSession object.
    When I try and specify an alternative SMTP address via the -PrimarySmtpAddress paramater I get the error
    " A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument '-PrimarySmtpAddress'.
    I have confirmed that the version of Exchange 2010 installed on the server should have this parameter - Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
    An example command :-
    New-Mailbox -Shared -Name "SharedMailbox_test" -Alias "testsharedmailbox" -DisplayName "SharedMailbox_test" -UserPrincipalName "[email protected]" -OrganizationalUnit "OU=Mailboxes,OU=Accounts,DC=domain,DC=com"
    -Database "DB1" -PrimarySmtpAddress "[email protected]" -force
    Has anyone else experienced this behavior?
    Steve.
    Just a good old boy, never meaning no harm

    Hi Rich,
    That was my initial thought too, so I triple-checked my command to see if it was a simple syntax error - it wasn't.
    On further investigation I compared the list of parameters available in a DEV EMS session (on where I know the command works) against the one in PROD where the problem occurs.  Both sessions are running the same version of EMS.
    I ran the following to get a list of parameter names in both sessions :-
    $a = gcm New-Mailbox
    $a.Parameters.Keys | sort
    Here's the results :-
    DEV EMS (working)
    Prod EMS (missing)
    AccountDisabled
    ActiveSyncMailboxPolicy
    AddressBookPolicy
    Alias
    Alias
    Arbitration
    ArbitrationMailbox
    Archive
    ArchiveDatabase
    ArchiveDomain
    AsJob
    AsJob
    Confirm
    Confirm
    Database
    Database
    Debug
    Debug
    Discovery
    DisplayName
    DisplayName
    DomainController
    DomainController
    Equipment
    Equipment
    ErrorAction
    ErrorAction
    ErrorVariable
    ErrorVariable
    FirstName
    FirstName
    Force
    Force
    ImmutableId
    Initials
    Initials
    LastName
    LastName
    LinkedCredential
    LinkedDomainController
    LinkedMasterAccount
    ManagedFolderMailboxPolicy
    ManagedFolderMailboxPolicyAllowed
    ModeratedBy
    ModerationEnabled
    Name
    Name
    Office
    OrganizationalUnit
    OrganizationalUnit
    OutBuffer
    OutBuffer
    OutVariable
    OutVariable
    Password
    Phone
    PrimarySmtpAddress
    RemoteArchive
    RemotePowerShellEnabled
    ResetPasswordOnNextLogon
    ResetPasswordOnNextLogon
    ResourceCapacity
    RetentionPolicy
    RoleAssignmentPolicy
    Room
    Room
    SamAccountName
    SamAccountName
    SendModerationNotifications
    Shared
    Shared
    SharingPolicy
    ThrottlingPolicy
    UserPrincipalName
    UserPrincipalName
    Verbose
    Verbose
    WarningAction
    WarningAction
    WarningVariable
    WarningVariable
    WhatIf
    WhatIf
    It might be a permissions-based issue, but I don't own either EMS session so can't test personally.
    I will keep investigating and update here once I have some further information.
    Regards,
    Steve.
    Just a good old boy, never meaning no harm

  • Exchange 2010 - 2013 Mailbox move - Syncing with no progress (Stalled?)

    I'm in the process of moving mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013, the major of the mailboxes have moved successfully, however I did not anticipate the additional space required by Exchange 2013 and ran out of disk space during the mailbox move,
    and some mailboxes did not move successfully.
    I have since added additional space but can't seem to get the remaining mailboxes to sync.
    I have tried :
    Rebooting
    Clearing out migration batches and recreating
    Stopping and resuming batches.
    I see nothing helpful in the Migration log files.
    2013-05-20T23:59:57.904Z,14,MigrationServicelet,Information,",827890ff-522d-4c13-9f42-96fbfefb57f4,,","Job type ExchangeLocalMove, status SyncStarting, result Working, length 0.2724593, job :827890ff-522d-4c13-9f42-96fbfefb57f4:ExchangeLocalMove:Staged:4::SyncStarting:2013-05-17
    2:59:12 PM::"
    When I download the report for one of the users I see this, but don't know what it means :
    The job is currently stalled due to 'Content Indexing' lagging behind on resource 'CiAgeOfLastNotification(Mailbox Database 2065686096)'
    For one of the other users the downloaded report only shows :
    ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​2013-05-16
    2:11:18 PM  '' created move request.
    DWW
    Additional Info:  I followed the info located here in regards to creating the ContentSubmitters group:
    http://www.bullspit.co.uk/2013/04/08/exchange-2013-content-indexing-during-migration/
    My mailbox database currently has Content index state: FailedAndSuspended
    I only have one database, I am not using DAG

    I had already created the contentsubmitters and it helped with the speed of the mailbox moves.  We have a SMB with >100 users and everything was working great, migrating from 2007 to 2013.  If I had it to do over, maybe it would have been better
    to go to 2010 on a 2008 R2 box but decided to jsut go straight to 2013 on a 2012 R2 server.  But the one thing I REALLY wish I had to do over again is to allocate about 3 times more space to the drive that was to hold the mailbox database.  Everything
    was working so well until a mailbox was being moved - a batch of several, I was doing maybe 5 at a time for the larger mailboxes - the disk filled up.  Also, before I realized what was going on, I ran some cmdlets thinking my receive connectors weren't
    right.  I recovered the database - at first it would not mount at all... but after eseutil /r and /p (and allocating more disk space) I could mount the database and open the mailboxes.  But from then on, nothing is being received and if you send,
    it goes to sent items - doesn't hang in outbox, but never goes anyhere except into a queue.  I have MS support working on it and it's been escalated to the top. If they fix it I will try to post any helpful information I can learn from it. But one
    lesson - I will read the planning and preparations documentation thoroughly from now on.
    Oh, and also, I keep getting this message in the ECP when navigating to the Recipients>migration applet:
    Cannot open mailbox /o=<Organization>/ou=Exchange Asministrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/CN=<yourExchangeserver>/cn=Microsoft System Attendant.
    If you did the same thing, (and didn't hang yourself or jump in front of a speeding locomotive), you are stronger than I.  Not that I have taken the path of the Samurai network admin or anything....
    And if you were able to fix it, I am impressed and would love to know how you fixed this.
    Thanks and best,
    Sam 

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem loading video on wifi

    When i'm on wifi at my house video doesn't work only one app is loading video and it iTube but youtube app and safari loading video forever , i try to see if it was the same with my ipod but on my ipod it working.. I already tried to reset all wifi s

  • IPad Advanced printing issue

    Hi, all, I work for a K-12 school and we are running into a crazy problem.  Problem: iPad isn't printing to a listed iPad compatible printer. Scenario: On a vlan.  Using a Mac server as a print server.  iPad & Print server are on the same vlan (v1). 

  • Rubberized Hard Case?

    Just asked this(person was helpfull but didn't know) Is Rubberized Hard case a good case? IS it better than a plain hard case, or do you think that it gets easily dirty and is hard to lean. I like the idea of a silicon feel but I'm hesitant to get on

  • Invoice wrt. multiple po

    I am creating a invoice with ref. of two po(one is std. and second is subcontracting Po) when i click on multiline button in MIRO and put both of po and press check button. In the coming screen, for only one po, vendor and vendor no. are displayed. F

  • [svn] 3808: Bug: N/A

    Revision: 3808 Author: [email protected] Date: 2008-10-22 07:58:36 -0700 (Wed, 22 Oct 2008) Log Message: Bug: N/A QA: No Doc: No Checkintests: Pass Details: Clean-up in FlexClient and MessageFrequency code after running some throttling tests with pol