Exchange 2010 cross subnet Dag - Errors creating DB copies in DR site
We are running exchange 2010 standard edition in our main site with 2 mailbox servers in a DAG. I've added 2 more mailbox servers in a DR site connecting over a 20Mb fiber connection. I've tried adding one of the DR mailbox servers over to the DAG as database
server, also tried updating copies of the database after it fails to update it. Been working with Microsoft support on this but they have been little slow getting back with me so wanted to see if I can find anyone that has had this issue before. We've
changed TCP global settings, they've set the Cluster setting for samesubnet and crosssubnet threshholds settings to recommended, made sure my DAG replication networks were correct and that's about it so far. Tried running the update database
from GUI and shell but to no avail. Seems like it is copying the logs and database but fails at the very end. We thought it might be backup software running so we turned that off completely. Here are the different error messages I get..
A source-side operation failed while performing seed operation. error occurred whil communicating with mbx-01 (source server..) unable to read data from transport connection.. connected host failed to respond..
A source side operation failed performing seed operation. An I/O error occurred while attempting to access file ..CatalogData-...ci on source server could not be opened. sys cannot find file.
Information Store (1988) Mailbox-MBX-01: The internal database copy (for seeding or analysis purposes) has been stopped because it was halted by the client or because the connection with the client failed.
Any help is appreciated..
Michael Duhon
Hello,
I recommend you try to restart Microsoft Exchange Replication Service to check the result.
If the issue persists, please try to rebuild the Index for your database to check the result.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support
Similar Messages
-
Best way to migrate Mailboxes with all permissions Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010--cross forest
Hi,
Due to some Exchange and Active Directory issues (with remnants of old Ex 2003 server), we are going to migrate Exchange 2010 Mailboxes and public folders to a new Exchange 2010 Sp3 server, which is created in a new AD forest.
I would really appreciate if someone can direct us to the best way to migrate mailboxes and PFs with their permissions, to new Ex 2010 SP3 server. We have around 30 mailboxes, and 300 GB of mailboxes data, and 200 GB of PFdata.
Thanks in anticipation.
Regards, David JohnsonHello,
Firstly, you need to creat forest trust between two forests.
If you want to move AD user account and mailboxes, please use ADMT and PrepareMoveRequest script.
If you want to migrate public folder, please export data to PST file and then import pst file to new server.
Additional article for your reference.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/08/10/3410619.aspx
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 cross forest simultaneous mailbox move limits
Hi All,
I am testing the throughput of mailbox moves from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 cross forest. Single mailbox moves seem to be quite fast and I am not concerned about network, disk IO or server resource limitations, however I have not tested multiple simultaneous
mailbox moves to determine what the Exchange limitations are. If anyone could identify the limitations of the items below it would be much appreciated:
Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per database
Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per Mailbox server
Limit of Exchange 2007 simultaneous mailbox moves per CAS server
Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per database
Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per Mailbox server
Limit of Exchange 2010 simultaneous mailbox moves per CAS server
Any other Exchange 2007 or 2010 hard coded limits
Thanks in advance.
Michael.My usual answer to this question is that Microsoft set these limits for a reason. Increasing them may not offer you much in the way of benefits if you end up slamming the server. I generally recommend that you leave them alone.
I have had occasional opportunities to change these constraints, most notably back during a migration to Exchange 2003 and international mailbox moves (Asia to U.S.) where the limiting factor was network latency. I was able to increase the number of
concurrent threads to 16 from the default 2 and there was still available bandwidth because the process was limited by the latency.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -
Exchange 2010 3 node DAG and split datacenters
Hi all,
I have a Exchange 2010 setup with 3 DAG nodes, 2 servers in Primary site & one in DR site, 2 active directory Sites, one domain controller per site. All roles on each server.
Each server has a single NIC, with the following configs:
Primary Site:
MBX1 IP = 192.168.1.11 - Network Name MAPI-Primary
MBX2 IP = 192.168.1.12 - Network Name MAPI-Primary
Cluster IP = 192.168.1.10
DR Site:
DRMBX1 IP = 192.168.100.11 - Network Name MAPI-DR
Cluster IP = 192.168.100.10
Dag name = DAG1
Under the DAG Networks, I see 3 Networks
DAG1_MAP1-Primary with the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet and the 2 MBX Network IP's in it.
DAG1_MAP1-DR with the 192.168.100.0/24 subnet and the 1 DR MBX Network IP in it.
and one called DAG1_Replication, which has a 10.1.1.0/24 subnet and NO NIC's in it. I think this was an original replication subnet used when there was only 2 nodes in the DAG and a cross over cable was used.
Can I delete the DAG_Replication network from the config?
Should I consolidate the 2 DAG1_MAPI-Primary and DAG1-MAPI-DR networks under one simply called DAG1-MAPI?
Secondly,
When I look at cluster manager on each of the 2 Nodes MBX1/2, I can see the 3 Nodes. Trying to run cluster manager on the DR node, and I can't connect to the DAG1 cluster, get an error saying not ready. Am I right in thinking this should not be
happening? I have a managed firewall, but don't have access too logs, any idea what ports could be dropped from DRMBX1?
Finally,
Cluster manager on the 2 working nodes shows an error:
Cluster Network Name is not online, and the Cluster Core resources panel shows cluster name DAG1 Offline, with ONLY 1 IP address, the DAG VIP (192.168.1.10) being online. Should I see the other 192.168.100.10 DAG VIP as well? Is this also a manifestation
of the firewall?
I have inherited this config, so I am not fully sure what a correct working condition should report look like. Any help on a clearer understanding would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance !!In answer to your first question, yes, if no server is listed with an IP address in that replication network, you can delete it without affecting the DAG operations.
As for your second question, if your servers are in different subnets, you need at least two networks defined in your DAG. And since your servers are in different Windows sites, I have to assume they are in different subnets. I believe that if
you check them in the EMC, you will only see IP addresses for the local servers in each network. So no consolidation is possible.
On your question about Cluster Manager, don't do anything in Cluster Manager - my personal experience has been that the Exchange toolset is sufficient for all management tasks related to an Exchange DAG. What are you trying to determine? Also,
Microsoft doesn't support a DAG installed across a firewall - either you open all ports between these servers (and all domain controllers in your forest), or you will have an unsupported configuration.
For your final question, I assume DAG1 is your DAG's network name, and those two IPs are the ones for the two datacenters. If this is the case, only one IP address will be active at a time. -
Rename existing Exchange 2010 database in DAG
Hello,
I want to rename one existing database on our exchange 2010 server. This database is in DAG and hosting around 1000 users. So not possible to create a new mailbox database and move.
How can I rename the database?
After renaming it, what will happen to the Copy database on another server as it is in DAG.
Thanks,
MihirAppreciate your response, Andy.
To clear my doubt,
If I am ok to reseed the passive copy, then I can follow below steps, Correct?
--> Remove Passive copy
--> Remove Database files and Log files on this passive server manually
And
"1. Then will a New database with this new name be created?"
--> On Move database, I will mention same location, but just
rename .edb file. So a exact copy of new database with this new name will be created. Correct?
--> And then I can delete the old named .edb, Correct?
Thanks. -
Content Index State Failed - Exchange 2010 2 Node Dag
Hello,
Last night I needed to restart one of my Exchange 2010 DAG nodes. I moved all Active Database copies of this node to the other node in the DAG. I then restarted the node with no Active Database copies. When the server came back up I moved
the Active Database copies back onto the node that they were initially on. The node that I restarted now shows the ContentIndexState of all Databases as "Failed". Test-replicationhealth gives the following results:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus -Server S01
Name Status
CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
DB01-MS01 (A-B)\S01 Mounted 0 0
Failed
DB02-MS01 (C-D)\S01 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 9:57:40 AM Failed
DB03-MS01 (E-G)\S01 Healthy 0 1
1/26/2011 10:02:38 AM Failed
DB04-MS01 (H-J)\S01 Mounted 0 0
Failed
DB06-MS01 (M-N)\S01 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:02:25 AM Failed
DB07-MS01 (0-P)\S01 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 9:57:17 AM Failed
DB08-MS01 (Q-R)\S01 Mounted 0 0
Failed
DB09-MS01 (S-T)\S01 Mounted 0 0
Failed
DB05-MS01 (K-L)\S01 Mounted 0 0
Failed
DB10-MS01 (U-V)\S01 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:01:59 AM Failed
DB11-MS01 (W-Z)\S01 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 9:57:50 AM Failed
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus -Server S02
Name Status
CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
DB01-MS01 (A-B)\S02 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:00:36 AM Healthy
DB02-MS01 (C-D)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB03-MS01 (E-G)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB04-MS01 (H-J)\S02 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:02:29 AM Healthy
DB06-MS01 (M-N)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB07-MS01 (0-P)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB08-MS01 (Q-R)\S02 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:02:32 AM Healthy
DB10-MS01 (U-V)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB11-MS01 (W-Z)\S02 Mounted 0 0
Healthy
DB05-MS01 (K-L)\S02 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:02:21 AM Healthy
DB09-MS01 (S-T)\S02 Healthy 0 0
1/26/2011 10:01:33 AM Healthy
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>test-replicationhealth
Server Check Result Error
S01 ClusterService Passed
S01 ReplayService Passed
S01 ActiveManager Passed
S01 TasksRpcListener Passed
S01 TcpListener Passed
S01 DagMembersUp Passed
S01 ClusterNetwork Passed
S01 QuorumGroup Passed
S01 FileShareQuorum Passed
S01 DBCopySuspended Passed
S01 DBCopyFailed Passed
S01 DBInitializing Passed
S01 DBDisconnected Passed
S01 DBLogCopyKeepingUp Passed
S01 DBLogReplayKeepingUp Passed
I appreciate any help. Thank you.
R[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus
Name Status
CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
DB01-MS01 (A-B)\01 Mounted
0 0 Healthy
DB02-MS01 (C-D)\S01 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:05:45 AM Healthy
DB03-MS01 (E-G)\S01 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB04-MS01 (H-J)\S01 Healthy
0 0 1/28/2011 11:07:50 AM Healthy
DB06-MS01 (M-N)\S01 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:02:12 AM Healthy
DB07-MS01 (0-P)\S01 Mounted
0 0 Healthy
DB08-MS01 (Q-R)\S01 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:09:08 AM Healthy
DB09-MS01 (S-T)\S01 Mounted
0 0 Healthy
DB05-MS01 (K-L)\S01 Mounted
0 0 Healthy
DB10-MS01 (U-V)\S01 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:02:53 AM Healthy
DB11-MS01 (W-Z)\S01 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-MailboxDatabaseCopyStatus
Name Status
CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime ContentIndex
Length Length State
DB01-MS01 (A-B)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:08:27 AM Healthy
DB02-MS01 (C-D)\S02 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB03-MS01 (E-G)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:10:36 AM Healthy
DB04-MS01 (H-J)\S02 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB06-MS01 (M-N)\S02 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB07-MS01 (0-P)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 10:58:23 AM Healthy
DB08-MS01 (Q-R)\S02 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB10-MS01 (U-V)\S02 Mounted 0
0 Healthy
DB11-MS01 (W-Z)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:09:45 AM Healthy
DB05-MS01 (K-L)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:09:42 AM Healthy
DB09-MS01 (S-T)\S02 Healthy 0
0 1/28/2011 11:08:34 AM Healthy -
Multiple OWA & ECP Virtual Directories on Exchange 2010 - 500 internal server error
hello folks,
I've been using below link to create multiple owa & ecp virtual directories on exchange 2010, but I have similar error -500 internal server error
during auth.owa from my 2nd owa url login.
exactly steps follow as below:-
http://johnyassa.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/publish-multiple-owa-ecp-virtual-directories-on-one-exchange-2010-cas-server/
did anyone has come across on this issue and do mind share to me?
thanks
regards
Jimmyhi Ed Crowley,
thanks for responding to me...
yes, I'm exactly follow blog below to configure my 2nd OWA URL with form based authentication method. upon login to my 2nd OWA URL, the owa authentication failed with return 500 - internal server error.
http://johnyassa.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/publish-multiple-owa-ecp-virtual-directories-on-one-exchange-2010-cas-server/ -
Exchange 2010 SP3 - Can DAG member be on OS 2012 R2 STD?
Hi guys.
We have Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2008 r2 enterprise.
now we are thinking about having DAG. I know that recommendations is to have the same OS on 2nd Exchange server but still is it possible to make DAG between: Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2008 r2 enterprise and on other side Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2012 R2 STD?
with best regards,
bostjancHi guys.
We have Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2008 r2 enterprise.
now we are thinking about having DAG. I know that recommendations is to have the same OS on 2nd Exchange server but still is it possible to make DAG between: Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2008 r2 enterprise and on other side Exchange 2010 SP3 on 2012 R2 STD?
with best regards,
bostjanc
No. It wont let you do that.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638104(v=exchg.141).aspx
DAGs are available in both Exchange 2010 Standard Edition and Exchange 2010 Enterprise Edition. In addition, a DAG can contain a mix of servers running Exchange 2010 Standard Edition and Exchange 2010 Enterprise Edition.
Each member of the DAG must also be running the same operating system. Exchange 2010 is supported on both the Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 operating systems. All members of a DAG must run either Windows Server 2008 or Windows Server 2008
R2. They can't contain a combination of both Windows Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2.
In addition to meeting the prerequisites for installing Exchange 2010, there are operating system requirements that must be met. DAGs use Windows Failover Clustering technology, and as a result, they require the Enterprise version of Windows.
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. -
Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2010 Cross Forest
Hi
We have a scenario where we have an Exchange 2007 organization (Org A - Source) and a separate Exchange 2010 organization (Org B - Target). Both the organizations (AD Forests) have two way trusts between them.
We want to have our Exchange 2007 users have their mailboxes hosted on Exchange 2010 organization. Meaning that the user (AD) accounts of Org A will remain in Forest A but there mailboxes will be available on Exchange 2010 servers in Org B. So we don’t need
a user / group migration stuff here and mailbox data on Exchange 2007 servers is also not critical (not required to be migrated) so we will be creating new disabled accounts and mailboxes in Org B for each user in Org A and connect the mailboxes. There will
be a brief period of co-existence between two Orgs (to enable mail-flow) until all the users have their mailboxes active in Org B. Need to figure out a way to achieve this.
We are planning to follow the steps below:
Setup name resolution between the forests (although basic connectivity is there and we can ping servers in one forest using IP Addresses from other forest) –
Please suggest if this is necessary or we can get away with it?
Setup SMTP namespace sharing for Exchange 2007 SMTP Domain name
Add Exchange 2007 SMTP domain as authoritative domain to E2K10
Create EAP for new SMTP Domain
SMTP Connector Creation for Direct E-mail Routing (Co-exist) Between Forests
Create disabled Mail Enabled (not Mailbox Enabled) User or Mail Enabled Contact in Org B.
Can we use Prepare-MoveRequest.ps1 script to create these?
Once a mail enabled user / contact is created in Org B for all the users, change incoming traffic from Internet for Org A SMTP domain to hit HT server in Org B
Make changes to Exchange 2010 certificate and install new certificate
Select a batch of users every day, create new mailbox for them using scripts in Org B and delete the corresponding contact in Org B
Can someone please confirm if this is correct and point out something I am missing?
Is there any other way to achieve the same goal?
Thanks
Taranjeet Singh
zamnHi Everyone
Thanks for the inputs so far. I need to confirm some steps to establish direct email flow unless all the mailboxes are created in target organization, can somebody have a look at the steps below and confirm if they are correct or add something that
I missed here:
Setup source Exchange organization:
a) Add unique SMTP domain for source organization, like @source.local. This domain will be added to all mail enabled objects in this organization and will be used for internal routing only
i) Add to Accepted Domains list
ii) Create EAP to add domain to existing objects
b) Use manual means to stamp SMTP domain to objects in source organization on objects that don’t have EmailAddressPolicyEnabled set to False
c) Create Send Connector to target forest. The target domain should also have a unique e-mail address, like @target.company.com (in our case 19 SMTP domains including JUBL.COM)
i) Include the valid SMTP domains and the unique one for internal routing
(source.local)
ii) Point to a smart host in the target forest
d) Set existing SMTP domain (JubilantRetail.com) as “Internal Relay Domain”. The target Exchange org will be authoritative for this domain
Setup target Exchange organization
a) Create Send Connector to unique SMTP domain in source forest. Includes shared name space (source.local) and @JubilantRetail.com
b) Set Default receiver connector, being used by source forest, to allow anonymous connections
c) Add shared SMTP domain (source.local) to Accepted Domains list as authoritative
d) Create EAPs to replicate the SMTP domains (e:g JubilantRetail.com and source.local) in the source environment
Thanks
Taranjeet Singh
zamn -
Exchange 2010 EMC and EMS errors - BLOCKED by software restriction
EMC has this message:
Initialization failed "Execution calling 'GetSteppablePipeline" with "1" arguement: File D:\program files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\RemoteScripts\ConsoleInitialize.ps1 cannot be loaded because its execution is blocked
by software restriction policies"
EMS has this error:
"There were errors in loading the format data file: D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1x
ml, , D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1xml : File skipped because of the following validation exception: File D:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange 2010\V14\Bin\exchange.format.ps1xml cannot be loaded because its execution is
blocked by software restriction policies. For more information, contact your system administrator."
All other powershell scripts work just fine. It is not the execution policy. That is set properly. Authenticode returns valid on the files. There are no settings it GPO to control or cause this. Email working fine. It just started
after a reboot for updates. Any other thoughts before I spend $500 for a call?
Server2008 Standard SP2
Update Rollup 4 v2 for Exchange Server 2010 SP2
Thank youThe long and short of it was Microsoft Certificates didn't update and were expired. I was not given a reason why this happened but the final solution after Microsoft spent 2 weeks on this was to first reinstall Exchange Service Pack 3, reboot. Install
update rollup 8, and reboot. This fixed the EMC but not the shell. Then they reinstalled the rollup 8 again and one more reboot. Everything now works. I'd say with all the other little tweaks they looked at as possible suspect and "other
things" they fixed in their efforts to solve this, I defiantly got my money's worth. Despite not really knowing what really caused the issue in the first place -
Exchange 2010 EWS - app_global.asax-error.
Im setting up an Exchange Online deployment on a costumers server enviroment. They have a single Exchange 2010 SP3 with Rollup 6 installed.
The users started complaining that they couldnt set out-of-office messages in Outlook, and that they were prompted for Exchange password in Lync repeatedly.
Now, im not sure if these errors came because of the Hybrid setup of its a coincidence, but here is what Ive done:
I started the Hybrid Wizard, but this one got some errors, so it didnt complete on the first run. The error was the following:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2626696
and I ran
ServiceModelReg.exe –r
on the server to fix it. This solved this problem, but a new one occurred with publishing of Autodiscover and EWS online. I called it a day, and was busy the next day so this was left like this for a few days.
The next day a few users complained that they couldnt set out of office. The next day after that, the lync error occured (there was a reboot that night. Im not sure if thats relevat). The errors in the Hybrid-wizard had then been solved, and the Hybrid-wizard
ran through, but the EWS-problem remained.
Now, on the server I get this error every second or so:
+
System
Provider
[ Name]
System.ServiceModel 3.0.0.0
EventID
3
[ Qualifiers]
49154
Level
2
Task
5
Keywords
0x80000000000000
TimeCreated
[ SystemTime]
2014-09-25T15:36:32.000000000Z
EventRecordID
933734
Channel
Application
Computer
<Server Name>
Security
[ UserID]
S-1-5-18
EventData
System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/20974680
System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException: The service '/EWS/Exchange.asmx' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation. The exception message is: Could not load file or assembly 'App_global.asax.hid_mutt,
Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.. ---> System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'App_global.asax.hid_mutt, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. File name: 'App_global.asax.hid_mutt, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' at System.Reflection.Assembly._nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase,
Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection) at System.Reflection.Assembly.InternalLoad(AssemblyName assemblyRef, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark& stackMark,
Boolean forIntrospection) at System.Reflection.Assembly.InternalLoad(String assemblyString, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean forIntrospection) at System.Reflection.Assembly.Load(String assemblyString) at System.ServiceModel.Activation.ServiceHostFactory.CreateServiceHost(String
constructorString, Uri[] baseAddresses) at System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.CreateService(String normalizedVirtualPath) at System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.ActivateService(String normalizedVirtualPath)
at System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath) WRN: Assembly binding logging is turned OFF. To enable assembly bind failure logging, set the registry value [HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog]
(DWORD) to 1. Note: There is some performance penalty associated with assembly bind failure logging. To turn this feature off, remove the registry value [HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Fusion!EnableLog]. --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String
normalizedVirtualPath) at System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.EnsureServiceAvailableFast(String relativeVirtualPath)
w3wp
4440
Any ideas is appreciated.Hi,
I am glad to hear that issue solved by yourself.
Event 3 indicated that Exchange missed Anonymous authentication on autodiscover/EWS Virtual directories.
To solve this issue, please enable Anonymous authentication on autodiscover/EWS Virtual directories through IIS manager by the following steps:
Open IIS manager.
Navigate to Sites>Default Web Site>Autodiscover.
Refer to the following picture to choose Authentication, then double-click it. Try to enable Anonymous Authentication.
Repeat steps 1-3 to enable Anonymous authentication on EWS.
Best Regards. -
Exchange 2010 sp2 emc initialization error using "kerberos" authentication failed
We use exchange 2010 SP2.
We have 2 management stations, both w2k8 R2 SP1.
I have one mangement station on which the emc and ems works ok.
On the other management staiton (which is also in another ad site) the emc and ems don't work.
I get the following error message : The attempt to connect to
http://fqdnCasServer/PowerShell using "Kerberos" authentication failed: Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : Access is denied. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
I have checked the time on the management station and on the exchange server and this is ok.
It is not a permissions issue because the user functions ok on the other management station.
On the bad management station I can open the emc once and after a minute I get an error message and the message access denied. From then on I can't connect any more.
What am I doing wrong?
Anyone any tips?
Thanks,
JBThis is what I get in the eventlog of the bad management station.
Log Name: MSExchange Management
Source: MSExchange CmdletLogs
Date: 1/10/2012 11:39:27
Event ID: 6
Task Category: (1)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: Server.domain.com
Description:
The description for Event ID 6 from source MSExchange CmdletLogs cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.
If the event originated on another computer, the display information had to be saved with the event.
The following information was included with the event:
Get-ExchangeServer
{Identity=Servername}
Domain/ou/ou/ou/ou/username
Exchange Management Console-Local
3080
22
00:00:00.3593888
View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Global Catalog: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ FQDN DN }'
Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.ManagementObjectNotFoundException: The operation couldn't be performed because object 'FQDN MGMTSTATION' couldn't be found on 'FQDN DC'.
Context
the message resource is present but the message is not found in the string/message table
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="MSExchange CmdletLogs" />
<EventID Qualifiers="49152">6</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>1</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-10-01T09:39:27.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>11</EventRecordID>
<Channel>MSExchange Management</Channel>
<Computer>FQDN MGMT STATION</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>Get-ExchangeServer</Data>
<Data>{Identity=MGMT STATION}</Data>
<Data>domain/ou/ou/ou/ou/username</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Data>Exchange Management Console-Local</Data>
<Data>3080</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Data>22</Data>
<Data>00:00:00.3593888</Data>
<Data>View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Global Catalog: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ FQDN DC }'</Data>
<Data>Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.ManagementObjectNotFoundException: The operation couldn't be performed because object 'FQDN MGMT STATION' couldn't be found on 'FQDN DC'.</Data>
<Data>Context</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
</EventData>
</Event> -
Exchange 2010 Decommisioning a DAG member from a 3 node Dag
Hi Guys,
What the safest way to remove one server from a 3 Node Dag.
Currently I am planning the following steps:-
Remove Exchange server MAIL03 from DAG
1.Start up Exchange Management Console
2.Go to Organization Configuration > Mailbox > Database Management;
3.if mail boxes are mounted on MAIL03, Select the database where ” Mounted on Server” reads the MAIL03;
3.1.Select Move Active Mailbox Database;
3.2.Select the Mailbox server i.e. MAIL01\MAIL02 to host the mailbox database copy and select Move;
5.When the move has finished, select the database copy hosted on the MAIL03 in the lower pane. There, select Remove.
6.Remove the MAIL03 server from the DAG. Select tab Database Availability Groups;
7.Select the DAG the MAL03 server is a member of and select Manage Database Availability Group Membership;
8.Select the server and click the red cross to remove it from the list. Click Manage to proceed with the actual removal;
9.When finished the mailbox server is no longer member of the DAG.
10.Rebalance Mailbox Databases in DAG.
What do you guys recommend?
Also after the removal of the DAG node, what the best way to reduce the Passive Database/Transaction logs? our current setup is as follows:-
I want to remove the drives L,M,N,O
Thanks
JitinderHello,
Based on your description.
If you want to remove drives only from that server and leave databases working on the rest of nodes:
1. Remove database copy on that server.
2. Remove drives.
It is not required to move mailboxes from these databases. In this scenario you will not be able to re-add copy of these databases because all nodes need to have the same drive
letters.
If you want to remove L, M, N, O from all servers:
1. Move mailboxes from these databases.
2. Remove them (copies and empty dabatabes).
3. Remove drives.
There is no need to remove server from DAG if you just want to remove database copy from one node.
Hope it helps,
Adam
www.codetwo.com
If this post helps resolve your issue, please click the "Mark as Answer" or "Helpful" button at the top of this message. By marking a post as Answered, or Helpful you help others
find the answer faster. -
When I installed Rollup 8 for Exchange 2010 SP2 it caused an error in EWS
EWS failed with the error:
exchange web service could not load file or assembly Exchange.MailboxReplicationService.ProxyService bad parameter
When I uninstalled the rollup all worked fine again.
Any ideas, Thanks in advance?Hi,
To apply this update rollup, you must have Exchange Server 2010 SP2 installed. And remove all interim updates for Exchange Server 2010 SP2 before you apply this update rollup. Please check your installation deployment by the following article:
Install the Latest Update Rollup for Exchange 2010
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff637981.aspx
Description of Update Rollup 8 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2903903/en-us
If all requirements and preparations are configured properly, please collect your error logs to check your installation. It would be helpful to post some event logs here for further analysis.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2010 cross mailbox database search
Hi there,
I have a customer who has an interesting scenario. They have an exchange 2010 server with 3 mailbox databases. They want to do a search for a text string across all databases which is reasonably straight forward but they also want to take that search back
in time and do a search across the databases as they were at points in time in the past (1 year and 2 years ago). They have backups to recover and we are thinking that we can recover the databases at the points in time required but we're unsure whether the
search works across recovered databases.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this or advise on how this might be achieved?
Thanks,
RichAssuming you're aware of the concepts surrounding Microsoft's recommendation to use Exchange Native Data Protection, and you're needing to search beyond what is currently protected. Otherwise, just use that.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876874(v=exchg.150).aspx#ENDP
So here's the issue with your request: Exchange Search uses the indexes, which would either need to be restored or re-built after a restore. so you'd need to do your search, and repeatedly mount restored databases, probably in an isolated environment
since i'd assume you'll want to reattach restored mailboxes to existing users, ensuring the index is in good shape and re-do your search. Sounds like a huge PITA. Does your backup software offer the functionality you're looking for? Microsoft's
DPM software only offers per-mailbox restores, but perhaps you've got something more sophisticated.
This is all complicated, which is why Microsoft recommends to use NDP.
Mike Crowley | MVP
My Blog --
Baseline Technologies
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can't open pdf files in Workspace using Reader 9.2. Getting this error "The Adobe Acrobat/Reader that is running cannot be used to view PDF files in a Web Browser. Please exit Adobe Acrobat/Reader and try again. I also have Acrobat 8.1.6 on my workst
-
Calling a java class from abap/bsp
Hello, I am still learning ABAP. I need to call a java class (a chart drawing library) from ABAP or from a BSP. What is the best way to do that ? Basically I would create an object, pass data from a database and then get some binary data from that ob
-
Easy Ease vs Easy Ease In/Out
Newbie question here what's the difference between Easy Ease vs Easy Ease In/Out? Thanks, Kristin.
-
MacBook Pro 4,1 stuck on blinking cursor during Win 7 x64 installation
Hi, I'm trying to install Windows 7 x64 on my MacBook Pro 4,1. I've repartitioned - no problems (although it took a while). I couldn't download the Apple drivers to a USB stick, so I unchecked that option. I'm using a Win7 x64 Pro DVD - full retail e
-
As new user to Mac I tranfered files from my PC to Mac using the Migration Assistant. All seemed to go well till I tried to access them. I think a new user account was set up as was supposed to. First time using Users & Groups the screen below showed