Exchange 2010 Integration with Salesforce

Hello,
We are planning to integrate our Exchange 2010 environment with Salesforce. This is to sync the contacts and events for Salesforce users.  They need us open the ports between Exchange 2010 servers and Salesforce servers. Is it fine if the ports are
opened between CAS array and salesforce servers ? or do we need to open the ports between all the exchange servers or salesforce servers? Please advise.
Thanks,

Hi,
Great information from both Derbyshire and Martin. Also find additional information for your reference:
Exchange Network Port Reference
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb331973(v=exchg.141).aspx
Thanks
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2010 Integration with SMSC Gateway

    Hi,
    Exchange 2010 is installed in Telecom Mobile Operator and having SMSC Gateway for SMS, I have sms gateway IPs and port with User name and password. Now i am looking to send messages to distribution group , Distribution group members are mail contacts and
    email format is   [email protected] , I am looking when someone send email to distribution and that email will sent as sms to members of that group.
    I am not interested to buy sms softwares.
    Regards
    Usman
    Usman Ghani - MCITP Exchange 2010

    Hi Usman,
    Per my know, it can't send SMS to DL via Microsoft method directly.
    I know that we can send SMS to a contact if you enable the ActiveSync feature and perform proper configuration.
    Found a similar thread for your reference:
    Sending text messages to distribution list with Outlook 2010 with Exchange 2010 
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/21a4214d-9b71-4713-8bf9-5aca2304ef85/sending-text-messages-to-distribution-list-with-outlook-2010-with-exchange-2010?forum=exchange2010
    Please correct me if there is any misunderstanding.
    Thanks
    Mavis
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How To Setup A Local Exchange Server Integrated With Office365 For A Single Mailbox

    Hello,
    We recently migrated to Office365 but had an issue since we need more than 16 simultaneous connections to a single mailbox. Because of this, we need to deploy a local Exchange Server that will be used to host a single mailbox that requires up to 500 simultaneous
    connections for a Contact Center application. I'm looking for information on how to setup the local Exchange Server to basically create a local instance of a mailbox hosted on Office 365. So we can have our application open the numerous simultaneous connections
    to our local server which will then connection to Office 365 to send/receive email through the mailbox hosted on Office365.
    Please let me know if you have any information or resources you can direct me toward.
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Hi,
    To deploy local Exchange server integrated with Office 365, we can depend on Exchange Server Deployment Assistant:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/exdeploy2013/Checklist?state=2419-W-AAAAAAAAQAAAAAEAAAAAAAA%7e
    Please note that there may be 9646 error if there are many simultaneous connections at the same time.
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 dag with only 2 servers

    I have my exchange 2010 running on win server 2012 R2 and I have installed another exchange 2010 server with the same FQDN and I want to configure DAG with only these 2 servers. Can I implement DAG with only 2 servers?Can the mailbox,client access and hub
    transport roles still work with only 2 servers? If Mailbox and Hub transport could work it will be fine for me as CAS switchover can always be done manually.My main concern is securing data. Any article on how to implement that would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes, we can create a DAG with 2Servers and Each server can have upto 100 database depends upon Standard or Enterprise.
    Here is a great link that explains about DAG
    Exchange 2010 DAG Installation
    Mark as Answer/Helpful Post if it helps
    Regards.
    Naren Neelam, Messaging Consultant, ITBigBang (P) Ltd Www.ITBigBang.Com | Hire Us for Messaging Consulting

  • Exchange 2010 server with 2 DAG servers - DAG1 and DAG2 - backup with 2 DPM servers one for each DAG server

    Hello,
      Please advice, i have an Exchange 2010 server with 2 DAG servers - DAG1 and DAG2 - backup with 2 DPM servers, one for DAG1 and one for DAG2 is it possible ?

    Hi,
    I confirmed with Exchange support team that DAGs could be backed up separately.
    Meanwhile backup database is important if you need to recover both Exchange server settings and database. See:
    Recover a database availability group member server
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638206.aspx
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Disable Lync 2013 Client and Exchange 2010 Integration

    Is it possible to disable integration to Exchange 2010 from a Lync 2013 client?  I found a key that works for Lync 2010 by setting HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Communicator\PersonalContactStoreOverride to 1.  That does not seem to do anything
    to a Lync 2013 client, nor have I been able to find a solution to disable it via Registry/GPO.  Some things I have found seem to indicate that key does is not used by a Lync 2013 client but that is somewhat speculation.  Can someone tell me if there
    is a key to disable this connectivity and disable it like what the key above does for 2010?  Thank you!

    Create a new-csclientpolicyentry -name "PersonalContactStoreOverride" -value "1" and assign it to a Client Policy
    see Raffaele's post at: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/0762e036-1f9f-43a6-bb81-686864260c9d/how-to-install-the-lync-client-through-sms-with-personal-information-manager-set-to-none?forum=ocsplanningdeployment
    Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
    Blog
    Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

  • Exchange 2010 : Doubt with recipient type and problem with disappearance of the original recipient in the mail relay

    Hello. First of all, thank you very much for your attention.
    After that, I will expose the problem:
    I have a user domain called "comercial" with a corresponding mailbox "[email protected]"
    . This user
    has assigned multiple emails such as "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]" , having as default   email "[email protected] ".
    On
    the other hand,
    another domain user
    called
    "menganito" with it's mailbox  "[email protected]" account, also has a few mail accounts "[email protected]", "[email protected]", " [email protected]"
    ...having
    as default   email "[email protected]
    The user "Comercial" is forwarding
    all of it's mails to the user "menganito".
    The problem is that "menganito" is not receiving the exact
    "comercial"
    sender email, but the email which appears by default ("[email protected]").
    "Menganito" would like to know
    from which email exactly the mails he is receiving have been sent ("[email protected]",
    or "[email protected]"
    or "[email protected]"). 
    Also, he would like to knowthe email of the original sender (from the outside of the domain) whom the user "Comercial"
    have received the email from.
    In another type of email servers (Kerio,...)
    this is not a problem, because forwarding by
    defaultis always showing
    the original sender and original receiver.
    Maybe the problem comes from the recipient type I'm using.
    Should I use another type of recipient? should I use a transport rule?
    Any idea ? Thanks again in advance.

    Hi Simon. First of all thanks for your answer.
    This happens with all accounts. I tried with news accounts and different browsers for OWA and Outlook anywhere and happens the same. Is not a cache problem
    The problem is
    when "[email protected]"(default
    and set as default answer
    account by
    exchange)
    receives
    a message in  "[email protected]" when
    forwards to "Menganito"
    this message will appear from"[email protected]"
    instead of "[email protected]".
    This happens with all accounts.
    I can understand that i can't avoid
    default reply address on the same
    domain, but also with different domains happens
    the same?
    The platform is only one clean and updated server 2012 as dc and another clean and updated server 2012 with exchange 2010 sp3 directly and after rollup 4 for exchange SP3, no previous versions and servicepacks of exchange 2010 was installed before. Before
    install exchange 2010 sp3, i installed all the filterpacks (3) and .net 3.5 and all updates that i finded for 2012 server (i tried for 2 days): No more updates for sure.  After, in powershell, i put this:
    Add-WindowsFeature NET-Framework-Core,RSAT-ADDS,Web-Server,Web-Basic-Auth,Web-Windows-Auth,Web-Metabase,Web-Net-Ext,Web-Lgcy-Mgmt-Console,WAS-Process-Model,Web-Mgmt-Tools,Web-ISAPI-Ext,Web-Digest-Auth,Web-Dyn-Compression,NET-HTTP-Activation,Web-Asp-Net,Web-Client-Auth,Web-Dir-Browsing,Web-Http-Errors,Web-Http-Logging,Web-Http-Redirect,Web-Http-Tracing,Web-ISAPI-Filter,Web-Request-Monitor,Web-Static-Content,Web-WMI,RPC-Over-HTTP-Proxy
    -Restart
    The machine and exchange works good (i3 with 4gb ram, and raid 1 1tb of HD) and the organization only has 15 mailboxes. No problems with even viewer and all is correct.
    Thanks again.

  • Exchange 2010 coexist with exchange 2013

    Hi All ,
    Planning to have a coexistence scenario in my environment which is mentioned below
    Exchange 2010 - ambiguous url in place - OA enabled 
    For mapi/rpc traffic - mail.domain.in -  exchange 2010
    For https traffic - mail.domain.in - exchange 2010
    mail.domain.in will get resolved in to cas array in exchange 2010 .
    After coexistence On our side we are not going to move the mail.domain.in namespace to exchange 2013 , Instead of that we are going to use a new namespace in exchange 2013 for internal outlook anywhere and it will be outlookmail.domain.in and for the remaining
    exchange 2013 services like pop,imap,owa,active sync url's,external OA will be having mail.domain.in as same as exchange 2010 namespace.
    just consider outlookmail.domain.in is available on the san certificate installed in exchange 2013.
    Note : 
    On my ide I would assume Internal outlook 2010 mapi users will connect directly to exchange 2010 servers on the namespace mail.domain.in
    Likewise i would assume Internal outlook anywhere 2013 users will connect directly to exchange 2013 servers on the namespace outlookmail.domain.in
    Services like pop,imap,owa,active sync ,external OA connections for both exchange 2010 and exchange 2013 from the external world will be routed from firewall to exchange 2013 servers .Then https traffic for exchange 2010 mailbox users will be proxied to 2010
    exchange server via exchange 2013 server.
    question : I would like to know above mentioned scenario is possible or not ?
    On my side I know in my environment i am having ambiguous url's in place and at the same time i don't want the exchange 2010 internal outlook users to connect via exchange 2013 rpc over http even though OA is enabled on exchange 2010.
    So simply i can say i need my internal exchange 2010 mailbox users has to connect via tcp/ip.
    All of you tell me your valuable suggestions.
    Regards
    S.Nithyanandham

    Hi,
    Going Straight to the point... and answering your question...
    The scenario above IS possible For a while... But going ahead in the migration process, You'd face problems once the Exch2013 doesn't know how to handle MAPI connections:
    As per Exchange Team...
    In this scenario where both the MAPI/RPC and HTTP workloads are using the same FQDN you cannot successfully move the FQDN to CAS 2013 without
    breaking your MAPI/RPC client connectivity entirely. I repeat, your MAPI/RPC clients will start failing to connect via MAPI/RPC once
    their DNS cache expires after the shared FQDN is moved to CAS 2013.
    As their recommendation, and I would tell you too by experience, the best option is to really use different internal and external URLs for the clients to connect to.
    change your design to use a specific internal-only FQDN for MAPI/RPC clients. If you are in the middle of a 2010 deployment using an Ambiguous
    URL I recommend you change your ClientAccessArray FQDN to a unique name and update the mailbox database RpcClientAccessServer values
    on all Exchange 2010 mailbox databases accordingly. Fixing this item mid-migration to Exchange 2010 or even in your fully migrated environment will ensure any newly created or manually repaired Outlook profiles are protected, but it will not automatically
    fix existing Outlook clients with the old value in the server field. 
    So the overall for this first point is to enable the OA for all internal users, so as to ease the migration process in the future, even if for the time being its not necessary.
    Also another point you should take into consideration is the version of yours OLK versions, as the minimum supported are as per below:
    Outlook 2007: 12.0.6665.5000 (SP3 + the November 2012 Public Update or any later PU)
    Outlook 2010: 14.0.6126.5000 (SP1 + the November 2012 Public Update or any later PU)
    Outlook 2013: 15.0.4420.1017 (RTM or later)
    I don't know the size of you network, but it might be necessary for you to use an inventory tool in order to identify that.
    As advised, its really worthy to have a look at the following article, thus to clarify your view about this issue.
    Ambiguous URLs and their effect on Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 Migrations
    From <http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/07/17/3574451.aspx> 
    Hope it can help you!
    Cheers,
    Think before you ask, give detail as much as possible, then ask and you will get help! Always have in mind, people do not guess! :)

  • Same CAS Array Exchange 2010 (HLB), with OS Windows 2008R2 and Windows 2012.

    Hello,
    We have a 10 node DAG (Exchange 2010 SP3, Windows 2008 R2), with 2 CasArray.
    We are planning to add news (multirole) servers and create a new DAG (Exchange 2010 SP3, Windows 2012) in this infra, in the same AD site, to migrate all mailbox from the other DAG (Migration from virtual servers to physical servers).
    So we use the same CasArray (HLB, with F5) with différent OS version, during the migration time (1 month or more). I haven't found anything that say it's not supported or can be problematic.
    Have you feedback or advice?
    Thanks,
    Sébastien

    Hi,
    Based on my knowledge, there is no need to deploy a CAS array with CAS servers running on the same Window version. The version can be different.
    After a Client Access server array is defined within an Active Directory site, all Client Access servers within that Active Directory site are automatically part of the Client Access server array.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 MBX with a Exchange 2003 Frontend server. Coexist?

    We currently have a exchange 2003 environment with 5 mailbox server and 1 front end server. We would like to introduce a 2010 Exchange MBX server. Is that possible? Do we just install the MBX role with CAS/HT? 
    Thnaks, 

    Hi 
    You need to have MBX,CAS and HUB all the three in Exchange 2010 else they wont be functioning without any one of them.
    You can introduce Exchange 2010 server in Exchange 2003 server environment 
    Ensure you have at-least Exchange server 2003 SP2 else the it wont allow you to install Exchange 2010 
    You can only deploy Exchange 2010 in an Exchange 2003 organization that operates in native mode
    Below article for your reference 
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998604(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.
    Regards,
    Sathish

  • Exchange 2010 Activesync with the Windows 8.1 mail app limited to 10 MB attachments?

    We have a few executives that want to use the mail app on their 8.1 tablets to access our Exchange 2010 SP3 Ru7 servers via Activesync.  They get connected and can sync mail, but when they
    try to download attachments that are larger than 10 MB, they get an error  (Sorry I don't have the exact wording)  the error doesn't say anything about attachment size limit, but it works if the attachment is 9.5 MB and they get the error as soon
    as the attachment is greater than 10 MB.<o:p></o:p>
    I tested the app with the same attachments greater than 10 MB with an Outlook.com account and it works ok on the Windows 8.1 tablet.<o:p></o:p>
    I also tested using an IPad against the Exchange servers and I can download attachments greater than 10 MB just fine.<o:p></o:p>
    So it looks like only the combination of Exchange (2010 in my case) and the Windows 8.1 mail app has the limitation? 
    <o:p></o:p>

    ActiveSync is limited in the same manner that OWA and web services are.  See the following page to see how to increase this limit: 
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996835(v=exchg.141).aspx

  • Exchange 2010 issues with emails attachments on phones

    ok i have an issue with exchange 2010 server 2008 r2
    i currently have 7 phones running activesync
    only one phone has a problem sending attachments to other phones in the company....
    however the phone can send regular email to any of the other phones without any problems.
    I have exhausted my abilities to figure out what is going on and at this point Im lost which has never happened before
    I mirrored the setting on another phone to the one with the problems and still no difference
    I also changed to the readahead size notifications to 20mb
    and unrestricted retrieval size
    both phones are galaxy S3's
    I am leaning towards a configuration error
    anyone have any ideas i can try?

    Hi 
    I think most probably it could be a problem with the Android device and not to analyze on readahead
    size notifications since this occurs only on a particular device 
    As a part of testing please follow the below things
    1) Try to configure active sync profile for different user on that device and try sending email with attachments and see the results.
    2) Try to configure profile on a different mobile for that affected user account and see the results.
    Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.
    Regards, 
    Sathish
    Sathish

  • Exchange 2010 ActiveSync with Treo 755p

    We're in the process of migrating from 2003 Exchange to 2010 and are having a problem with Treo's 755p. All other devices are able to synchronize using ActiveSync but Treo's are getting an error connecting to the server. I tried calling Palm and was told that Exchange 2010 is not supported. 
    We have a GoDaddy's 256-bit SSL class 2 certificate could this be a culprit?
    Has anyone got it to work? How? 
    Post relates to: Treo 755p (Sprint)

    itad wrote:
    We have a GoDaddy's 256-bit SSL class 2 certificate could this be a culprit?
    Did that certificate work with Exchange 2003 on the same host name? If so, then the certificate probably is not the culprit. If it's a new certificate or a new host name, you could search here for SSL threads. There may be issues with 128 vs. 256 bit certificates, and having the host name listed in the Subject Alternative Name field rather than being the main host name on the certificate.
    I don't have any personal experience with 2010...

  • Exchange 2010 - Issues with Room Finder not showing available rooms.

    Hi,
    We are having issues with room finder not populating the room resources that are available inside a meeting request within outlook 2010. It also appears that there is a drop down box that is present in a lot of the other forums and pages that I have referenced
    for troubleshooting:
    Single Exchange 2010 server version 14.03.0224.002 running all roles. Migrated from previous Exchange 2003 environment and old 2003 server has been decommissioned.
    Room mailbox created and all configured resource policies are working correctly for creating meeting requests. A distribution group was created and the room mailboxes added to this DG as per instructions here: hxxp://exchangeserverpro.com/find-meeting-rooms/
    . We have recreated the OAB and confirmed that the Room mailboxes are part of this list.
    Does anyone have any ideas why the rooms are not showing up in the Room Finder box?
    If I have missed any information please feel free to ask for more info.
    Thanks, all help will be appreciated.

    Hi,
    According to your description, I understand that room finder cannot show available room in Outlook 2010.
    If I misunderstand you concern, please do not hesitate to let me know.
    I want to double confirm whether it works before, or it can’t work after decommission Exchange 2003? How about other Outlook version?
    The offline address book (OAB) is generated by Microsoft Exchange Server. In order for the Room Finder feature to work, the OAB must be generated by Exchange 2010 or a later version.
    Please run Get-OfflineAddressBook | FL Identity,Server to double check OAB generation server. Also, run Get-OabVirtualDirectory | FL to check URL for current OAB VD and force update OAB.
    Then open Test E-mail AutoConfiguration to double check whether Outlook get correct URL.
    After above complete, please try to switch to Send/Receive tab, click Send/Receive Groups, and then click Download Address Book.
    Thanks
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Allen Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 install with Exchange 2013 present

    Good day,
    I have an Exchange 2010 SP3 instance, I then added a Exchange 2013 installation, the 2010 Exchange needs to be rebuilt due to space issues on the current host and moving the 2010 Exchange will require too much downtime.
    The issues that I am running into is when installing the new instance of 2010 on the new host with the Exchange 2010 x64 SP1 ISO, I am met with the following error:
    [08/22/2014 07:09:03.0912] [1] 0.  ErrorRecord: The object is read-only because it was created in a version of Exchange later than Exchange 0.20 (15.0.0.0). Current supported version is 0.10 (14.0.100.0).
    [08/22/2014 07:09:03.0912] [1] 0.  ErrorRecord: Microsoft.Exchange.Data.InvalidObjectOperationException: The object is read-only because it was created in a version of Exchange later than Exchange 0.20 (15.0.0.0). Current supported version is 0.10 (14.0.100.0).
    After some reading I understand that Exchange 2010 must include SP3 to co-exist with Exchange 2013, all the roles have installed without any issues except the client access role, I get the above mentioned error, thus I cant upgrade to SP3.
    I came across a solution where the OAB needs to be removed and then re-created, but unfortunately this will cause too much issues as the OAB is always in use.
    So I am stranded where I need 2010 SP3 to install the server, but as far as I know there is no 2010 ISO with SP3 available.
    Any advice would be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Hendrik

    "So I am stranded where I need 2010 SP3 to install the server, but as far as I know there is no 2010 ISO with SP3 available."
    I'm not sure I understand this? If you download Exchange 2010...
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=36768
    That *is* the SP3 version.
    Otherwise, if you install Exchange 2013 (with no other Exchange 2010 servers present), you definitely cannot add 2010 servers after the fact.
    http://forums.petri.com/showthread.php?t=64056
    But if you started with 2010, then add 2013... I think you can add or replace 2010 servers provided they are at SP3.
    What if you had lots of Exchange servers (a hosting company for example) and had to replace a server member of a DAG? Let's assume some mailboxes have been migrated to DAGs on E2K13 and some are still on E2K10.
    Note: within a particular DAG you cannot have differents versions of Exchange but you could have some DAGs with E2K10 and others using E2K13.
    It would seem that you would have to be able to install a new/replacement E2K10 server in this case? You could not replace it with a E2K13 server.
    Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Don't know where else to turn

    Please help if you can, I'm having printing problems and can't resolve. Have an old Epson Stylus Photo 1280 and have cartridges from an OEM dealer. Never seemed to have problems before until recently. The printing is off <> muddy <> photo prints with

  • Message formatting not appearing correctly

    A user in my firm are sending out an email and the formatting of the email does not display correctly from his sent items or the users who view the email, but when someone else send out the exact email from there machine is looks 100%. Attached a scr

  • File Manager with tree view

    I've been using Cinnamon with the Nemo file manager for a while now but I'm wanting to remove Cinnamon and have only Openbox and Awesome installed. The only thing that's stopping me now is I'm unsure of what to use for a file manager. The feature of

  • Is my installation of SQL Server Fail Over cluster correct?

    I made a 2 node SQL Server 2012 fail over cluster but having some problems during installation so I wanted to know if the steps below I performed are correct. Hardware Node1 192.168.1.10 Node2 192.168.1.11 Added following entries in DNS cluster.domai

  • Where's the old stuff hidden?

    Would some kind person please point me to instructions on a completely clean install of v1. I have add/removed beta4, deleted folders under Program Files and Application data, but when I install v1 it finds the folders and previews I had under the be