Exchange 2010 RTM Analyzer giving domain prep error but version number is correct?

I have recently inherited an Exchange 2010 Standard server environment, which appears to be running RTM and unpatched.
Version: 14.0 (Build 639.21)
When I run Best Practice Analyzer, it gives an error message, claiming that an unrecognized Exchange signature for the domain. The signature it detects is 12639, but MS' list of Exchange Signatures for Exchange 2010 appear to be:
Exchange Server 2010: 12769
Exchange Server 2010 SP1: 13040
So I'm not sure why Exchange Best Practice Analyzer is claiming that the signature is unrecognized? Is this a known issue? I am preparing to upgrade the server to Service Pack 3, but I don't want to attempt the upgrade if BPA is still claiming
a critical issue with the domain prep.

Hi,
Based on my knowledge, the above error is a known issue in Exchange 2010 RTM and it won't cause any risk. You can upgrade to Exchange 2010 SP3.
What's more, here is a thread for your reference.
2010 ExBPA
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/0d76559d-946b-4915-a54a-ee3914081f2e/2010-exbpa?forum=exchange2010
Hope my clarification is helpful.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Exchange 2010: New Mailboxes cannot receive external email, but internal works fine. Existing Mailboxes are working properly.

Hello,
I can't seem to figure out what the problem is, but my new mailboxes cannot receive external email. The sender receives an NDR stating the following:
The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13).
Internally, the affected mailboxes can send and receive mail, and the mailboxes have no trouble sending mail out of the organization. I do not see an anti-spam solution installed on the exchange server, and I have confirmed that DNS resolved to the WAN IP
of this server.
Can anyone help me? The message tracker didn't appear to have recorded the NDR's that it sent, but it's possible I didn't view the logs correctly.
Thank you!
Paul
My environment contains two servers:
Server A: Domain Controller, Server 2008 R2, Exchange 2010 Standard
Server B: Domain Controller, Server 2008 R2

On Wed, 30 May 2012 02:01:19 +0000, Relion Support Inc wrote:
>
>
>Hello,
>
>
>
>I can't seem to figure out what the problem is, but my new mailboxes cannot receive external email. The sender receives an NDR stating the following:
>
>The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 No such user - psmtp (state 13).
>
>
>
>Internally, the affected mailboxes can send and receive mail, and the mailboxes have no trouble sending mail out of the organization. I do not see an anti-spam solution installed on the exchange server, and I have confirmed that DNS resolved to the WAN
IP of this server.
>
>
>
>Can anyone help me? The message tracker didn't appear to have recorded the NDR's that it sent, but it's possible I didn't view the logs correctly.
Is your Exchange server exposed to the Internet or do you have some
3rd-party device that does spam filtering? If you have something out
in front of Exchange that only periodically refreshes its cache of
valid SMTP addresses from the AD then you need to adjust the refresh
rate.
That "550 No such user" isn't a status code that Exchange returned.
Rich Matheisen
MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
--- Rich Matheisen MCSE+I, Exchange MVP

Questions about upgrading from Exchange 2010 RTM to Exchange 2010 Service Pack 3

I am preparing to perform an maintenance upgrade on our current Exchange 2010 Server, to Service Pack 3 (and any post-SP3 roll ups), but I have a couple questions about the process.
Current Exchange Server details:
Exchange 2010 Standard
Version: 14.0 (Build 639.21) - from Exchange Management Console
Version: 14.0.702.4000 - from Outook client
Active Directory forest and domain levels: Windows 2008 R2 native
The questions I have are:
1. Can I assume that because it's version 10.0.702.4000 I am on Exchange Server 2010 RTM Update Rollup 4?
2. Can Exchange 2010 Standard RTM be patched directly to Service Pack 3, or would I need to perform incremental patches (i.e. SP1, SP2, etc.) before going to SP3?
3. Do I need to manually perform the AD domain schema prep before applying Service Pack 3, or will the Service Pack 3 update process automatically handle the modifications of the AD schema?

Hi,
Here are my answers you can refer to:
1. Firstly, I’d like to explain , we can use connection status to check our Exchange server version from Outlook client:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/outlook-help/determine-the-version-of-microsoft-exchange-server-my-account-connects-to-HA010117038.aspx
And I check my version from both EMC and Outlook client. It’s same.
2. We can directly update RTM version to SP3 , and the update will take an additional 30 minutes or longer per database.
3. Since Exchange 2010 SP3 makes updates to the Active Directory schema, we need prepare AD domain schema. However, it will automatically prepare AD and the domain when you install the update.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj965774(v=exchg.141).aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2003 migrate to Exchange 2010 - single forest multiple domain. Active Sync problem

Hi All,
I have AD single forest and multiple domain. for example, the forest domain is jakarta.co.id, and the other domain is bali.co.id.
Exchange 2003 deployed in jakarta.co.id, User mail enabled in domain jakarta.co.id and bali.co.id.
Then, I upgrade to Exchange 2010 (deploy in jakarta.co.id) and move mailbox from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010.
All users in bali.co.id are able to access email from Owa, BlackBerry (BIS), Outlook, but cannot access from Android, Windows Phone. (Active-Sync).
I got error information generated from https://testconnectivity.microsoft.com, as following:
Attempting the FolderSync command on the Exchange ActiveSync session.
The test of the FolderSync command failed.
Tell me more about this issue and how to resolve it
Additional Details
Exchange ActiveSync returned an HTTP 500 response (Internal Server Error).
Active-Sync still not work even I check option "Include inheritable permissions from this object" in security tab.
any idea to fix this issue?
Thanks.
Endrik
Endrik | blog: itendrik.wordpress.com Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

Hi Sathish,
We are planning to migrate Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2013, all user already in Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2003 was decommissioned
Event Viewer log as following:
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchange ActiveSync
Date: 1/17/2014 10:00:48 PM
Event ID: 1008
Task Category: Requests
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: EXC2010.jakarta.co.id
Description:
An exception occurred and was handled by Exchange ActiveSync. This may have been caused by an outdated or corrupted Exchange ActiveSync device partnership. This can occur if a user tries to modify the same item from multiple computers. If this is the case,
Exchange ActiveSync will re-create the partnership with the device. Items will be updated at the next synchronization.
URL=/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/default.eas?Cmd=Sync&User=bali%5Csteveng&DeviceId=SAMSUNG123456789&DeviceType=SAMSUNGGTN7000
--- Exception start ---
Exception type: Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.AirSyncPermanentException
Exception message: A null value was received for the NTSD security descriptor of container CN=ExchangeActiveSyncDevices,CN=Steven Gerrard,OU=IT,DC=bali,DC=co,DC=id.
Exception level: 0
HttpStatusCode: 500
AirSyncStatusCode: 110
XmlResponse:
This request does not contain a WBXML response.
Exception stack trace: at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.ADDeviceManager.SetActiveSyncDeviceContainerPermissions(ActiveSyncDevices container)
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.ADDeviceManager.CreateActiveSyncDeviceContainer(Boolean retryIfFailed)
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.ADDeviceManager.CreateActiveSyncDevice(GlobalInfo globalInfo, ExDateTime syncStorageCreationTime, Boolean retryIfFailed)
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.ADDeviceManager.CreateActiveSyncDevice(GlobalInfo globalInfo, ExDateTime syncStorageCreationTime)
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.Command.UpdateADDevice(GlobalInfo globalInfo)
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.Command.CompleteDeviceAccessProcessing()
at Microsoft.Exchange.AirSync.Command.WorkerThread()
--- Exception end ---.
I think KB817379 is not related because Exchange 2003 was decommissioned.
Regards,
Endrik
Endrik | blog: itendrik.wordpress.com Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

Exchange 2010 in a DSfW Domain?

Hi
Can i install Exchange 2010 in a DSFW only Domain or does i need a real AD Domain and then make a trust between the two domains?
Thanks
Ren

Originally Posted by RENEK
Hi
Can i install Exchange 2010 in a DSFW only Domain or does i need a real AD Domain and then make a trust between the two domains?
Thanks
Ren
Hi Ren,
Installing Exchange 2010 directly into a DSfW domain will not work and is not supported. You won't even get passed the prep stage as the schema extensions that are required won't get accepted by the DSfW controllers.
Best way to go about this (if you already have DSfW setup) is to create a basic AD and define a cross forest trust between the two. Install Exchange 2010 into AD and provision the users from the DSfW domain over the trust.
If you don't have DSfW setup, using IDM (the bundle edition is licensed along with GroupWise/OES) is another option.
Cheers,
Willem

Installing Exchange 2010 on Server 2008 R2 Get error with Hub Transport Role

Hub Transport Role
Failed
Error:
The following error was generated when "$error.Clear();
          install-MsiPackage `
          -PackagePath ($RoleInstallPath + "TransportRoles\agents\Hygiene\ASEntIRS.MSI") `
          -LogFile ($RoleSetupLoggingPath + "\InstallASEntIRS.msilog") `
          -PropertyValues ("ALLUSERS=1") `
          -UpdatesDir $RoleUpdatesDir
        " was run: "Installing product D:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\TransportRoles\agents\Hygiene\ASEntIRS.MSI failed. Fatal error during installation. Error code is 1603.".
Installing product D:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\TransportRoles\agents\Hygiene\ASEntIRS.MSI failed. Fatal error during installation. Error code is 1603.
Fatal error during installation
Elapsed Time: 00:00:01
Client Access Role
Cancelled

Hi,
From the description, I recommend you copy the Exchange installation files to the local machine, or download a fresh copy of Exchange 2010 and then reinstall it.
Besides, please ensure that you install Exchange 2010 on 64-bit edition of Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard with SP1 or Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise with SP1.
If the issue persists, please refer to the following KB further troubleshooting.
You receive error 1603 when you try to install the Exchange Server 2010 RU1
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/981474
Hope it helps.
If you need further assistance, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010: Remove high available mailbox database error

Hello everyone,
I have a two node DAG exchange 2010 and recently split one mailbox database into two databases.
Now when removing the original database I get the following error:
Please provide specific details.
The following was done thus far:
Deleted all softdeleted items
this is not the default mailbox database
Suspended the second mail server and removed it from mailbox, leaving now just one mail server attached to the mailbox database.
Help

Try to check mailbox import request is there or no by this command. Get-MailboxImportRequest. If you can see any requests listed. Remove it by this command Get-MailboxImportRequest | Remove-MailboxImportRequest.
Thanks, MAS
Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

Exchange 2010 webmail - contact search returns an error when single letter is used

Exchange 2010 SP2 environment. In Webmail when a user creates a new message, pressing on the To: button to add recipients, if they search the GAL, a single letter search (A for example) returns all names starting with A.
If they try to perform the same search for their contacts they get: No results found in IE or the error below in Firefox and Chrome. If I search contacts with two letters "Ab" for example then no error occurs and I get results. So search doesn't work
the same way for contacs vs GAL. Is this normal for webmail 2010?
An unexpected error occurred and your request couldn't be handled.
Request
Url: https://webmail.contoso.com:443/owa/ev.owa?oeh=1&ns=CP&ev=LoadFresh&pfmk=M35:1407960692770;M2:1407960692796;M23:1407960694745
User host address: 10.1.3.9
User: User Name
EX Address: /o=xxxxxxx/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=username
SMTP Address: [email protected]
OWA version: 14.2.247.5
Mailbox server: MBX1.contoso.com
Exception
Exception type: System.NullReferenceException
Exception message: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Call stack
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.GetDidLastSearchFail()
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.VirtualListView2.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.Controls.AddressBookVirtualListView.LoadData(Int32 startRange, Int32 rowCount)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.VirtualListViewEventHandler2.InternalLoadFresh(Boolean renderHeaders)
Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa.Premium.ContactVirtualListViewEventHandler.LoadFresh()

I doesn't happen on mine, but I'm now on SP3. It might help if you upgrade - even if you don't want to go to SP3 yet, your OWA version appears not to be at rollup 2 level. I only mention this because if it is a problem specific to version 14.2.247.5 (which
could easily be the case, because MS change the OWA scripts with surprising frequency) , it's going to be hard finding people who can reproduce the problem.
But to answer the question in the last sentence, searching the GAL and searching Contacts is, in a technical sense, very different. The GAL search is done with an LDAP query against Active Directory, whereas Contacts are usually going to be mailbox items,
plus a few AD contact items.
OWA For SmartPhone

Exchange 2010 Autodiscocer for non-domain computers.

Hello. I have problems with autodiscover for non -domain computers. Somebody can explain me in turn what i must do for configuration.

Hi,
For your Non-domain joined clients, the Outlook would connect to Exchange mailbox from the Internet. We need to enable Outlook Anywhere for your external users:
Enable-OutlookAnywhere -Server:Exch10 -ExternalHostname:mail.contoso.com
-ClientAuthenticationMethod:Ntlm -SSLOffloading:$true
For autodiscover service, when Outlook is started on a client that is not domain-connected, it first tries to locate the Autodiscover service by looking up the SCP object in Active Directory. Because the client is unable to contact Active
Directory, it tries to locate the Autodiscover service by using Domain Name System (DNS). In this scenario, the client will determine the right side of the user’s email address, that is, contoso.com, and check DNS by using two predefined URLs. For example,
if your email address is [email protected], Outlook will try the following two URLs to try to connect to the Autodiscover service:
https://contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
https://autodiscover.contoso.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
For more information about autodiscover service in Exchange 2010, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj591328(v=exchg.141).aspx
Therefore, you don’t need to change any configuration for Autodiscover. Just make sure your Exchange certificate which is assigned with IIS service has included aotodiscover.contoso.com name and the certificate is valid and trusted for external
user using. If not, please create a new SRV record for your autodiscover service and pointed to
mail.contoso.com. For more information about SRV record of autodiscover, please click:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940881
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 Certificates, IPs, and Domain Names...

I'm setting up a new Exchange 2010 server, migrating from an old Exchange 2003.
I'm at the point now where I'm stuck and cannot move the mailboxes of the users to the new server until I get the new server setup with certificates, reconfigure the firewall, and more Aname records. ... reason, I'd like to take advantage of the autodiscover,
sync, outlook anywhere, etc.
I've been tossing ideas around but I think I'm over thinking this entire thing on domain names, anames, certificates, etc.
Can someone tell me what the best practice would be for creating the CSR? And I'm a bit curious as to IPs.
While the examples in the New Exchange Certificate wizard all show 'mail.contoso.com' I wanted to be more specific on the functions of each but maybe I'm causing myself a lot of extra work. Each full aname needs pointed to a different public IP from my understanding
of the certificates. Can anyone tell me if this approach(below) is best practice or far from it?
I'm very intrigued with the capabilities but dont' understand why MS would use as an example the same domain name, mail.contoso.com for each function. But it may be because they'd just have to point to one IP address whereas I'll have to point several IPs
public to a single IP internal.
I'm just asking for suggestions... and ideas... and how you setup your exchange 2010
I was going to create:
Outlook Web App:
webmail.domainname.com,domainname.com
Sync:
sync.domainname.com,domainname.com
Autodiscover:
domainname.com
Outlook Anywhere:
outlook.domainname.com, domainname.com

Not sure I understand - but why do you want to map each individual service to an individual public IP ? Usually the trend is to keep as little public IPs as possible (you can get away with 1 public IP for the CAS role). For autodiscover, I've usually seen
the autodiscover.domainname.com being used, due to the domainname.com reserved (public site) - this actually keeps inside the logic used by Outlook clients to autodetect the servers (see
this link).
As for the Subject Alternate Names (SANs) on the certificate itself - it all depends whether you're publishing the server directly (in this case you'll want to get away with as little SANs as possible) or you'll use a reverse proxy (TMG/WAP) to publish the
internal box (in this case the certificate on the reverse proxy can contain little SANs, but the internal server can have SANs map to each service if you want).
Also - Allen's link is a definitely must read.

MS Exchange 2010 Outook Web App "Untrusted Connection" error in Firefox. No issue with IE or Chrome

I installed Microsoft Root CA Certificate on my Computer. (For Exchange 2010 Outlook Web Access) But Firefox appear "This Connection is Untrusted" error ((Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)). IE and Chrome works fine.
My firefox version is 18.0.1.
I want to fix this issue without adding a exception. Please help.

Try to export those certificates in IE and import the certificates in Firefox.
*Tools > Options > Advanced : Encryption: Certificates - View Certificates
If this is to be a root certificate then you need to set the applicable trust bits.

Exchange 2010 SP1 install fails with -1603 error

I am getting a -1603 error when installing Exchange 2010 SP1. Installation fails when copying files/removing old version with the following error:
[10/01/2010 23:17:06.0823] [2] Beginning processing uninstall-MsiPackage -ProductCode:'6574fdc2-40fc-405a-9554-22d1ce15686b' -LogFile:'C:\ExchangeSetupLogs\InstallSearch.msilog'
[10/01/2010 23:17:06.0847] [2] Removing MSI package with code '6574fdc2-40fc-405a-9554-22d1ce15686b'.
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0400] [2] [ERROR] Unexpected Error
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0401] [2] [ERROR] Couldn't remove product with code 6574fdc2-40fc-405a-9554-22d1ce15686b. Fatal error during installation. Error code is 1603.
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0401] [2] [ERROR] Fatal error during installation
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0409] [2] Ending processing uninstall-MsiPackage
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0411] [1] The following 1 error(s) occurred during task execution:
[10/01/2010 23:17:09.0412] [1] 0. ErrorRecord: Couldn't remove product with code 6574fdc2-40fc-405a-9554-22d1ce15686b. Fatal error during installation. Error code is 1603.
Does anyone know how to resolve this?
Thanks,
greg

Hi Frank,
I've the same problem when I try to install the SP2.
When I try to install RU 4v2, 5 or 6, then comes error 2771. So I waiting for SP2 in the hope, a full install of the SP will fix this.
But the setup broke with the following entries:
[12.07.2011 19:51:59.0379] [0] Setup will run the task 'uninstall-msipackage'
[12.07.2011 19:51:59.0379] [1] Setup launched task 'uninstall-msipackage -logfile 'C:\ExchangeSetupLogs\ExchangeSetup.msilog' -ProductCode '4934d1ea-be46-48b1-8847-f1af20e892c1' -PropertyValues 'BYPASS_CONFIGURED_CHECK=1 DEFAULTLANGUAGENAME=DEU''
[12.07.2011 19:51:59.0379] [1] Die Active Directory-Sitzungseinstellungen für 'Uninstall-MsiPackage' lauten: Vollständige Gesamtstruktur anzeigen: 'True', Konfigurationsdomänencontroller: 'LicPDC.kh-lichtenstein.local', Bevorzugter globaler Katalog:
'LicPDC.kh-lichtenstein.local', Bevorzugte Domänencontroller: '{ LicPDC.kh-lichtenstein.local }'
[12.07.2011 19:51:59.0379] [1] Beginning processing uninstall-msipackage -LogFile:'C:\ExchangeSetupLogs\ExchangeSetup.msilog' -ProductCode:'4934d1ea-be46-48b1-8847-f1af20e892c1' -PropertyValues:'BYPASS_CONFIGURED_CHECK=1 DEFAULTLANGUAGENAME=DEU'
[12.07.2011 19:51:59.0410] [1] Removing MSI package with code '4934d1ea-be46-48b1-8847-f1af20e892c1'.
[12.07.2011 19:52:04.0551] [1] [ERROR] Unexpected Error
[12.07.2011 19:52:04.0551] [1] [ERROR] Couldn't remove product with code 4934d1ea-be46-48b1-8847-f1af20e892c1. Schwerwiegender Fehler bei der Installation. Error code is 1603.
[12.07.2011 19:52:04.0551] [1] [ERROR] Schwerwiegender Fehler bei der Installation
[12.07.2011 19:52:04.0613] [1] Ending processing uninstall-msipackage
The MSI package with code '4934d1ea-be46-48b1-8847-f1af20e892c1' ist the SP1.
Actual System: Server2008R2SP1 / Exchange2010SP1 RU3v3
It is possible to solve this problem?
Rene Hubert - Systemadministrator - DRK KH Lichtenstein gGmbH
I too have this
problem.

User Migration from Parent Domain to Child Domain..The user is enabled with Exchange 2010 Mailbox in Parent Domain

We currently have a single Windows 2008 R2 Active Directory domain controller, and an Exchange 2010 server. We are in the process of adding a child domain on a second Active Directory server for an offsite office location for a subdivision of our company.
The two locations will be connected via VPN.
Currently users exist on the root domain with Exchange accounts who will be moving to the new offsite company/location. We would like to be able to move these user accounts to the child domain while maintaining their existing Exchange mailboxes and
email addresses. Is this possible, and if so how would we do it?

Hi Srinivasa,
According to your description, I think you have done all the preparation.
For DL migration, the following article may give your some hints:
How to Migrate Distribution Groups Across a Forest
Good Luck!
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 GAL Export script working from EMS but not as a scheduled task

I have been asked to get a script together to export the GAL on an Exchange 2010 server and then email it to a manager. I have been playing it with days, and have pruned it to the very minimum to at least try and get it working before improving it. At the
moment I have the text as below:
Del c:\GALexport.csv
Get-Recipient -ResultSize unlimited | where {$_.HiddenFromAddressListsEnabled -eq $false} | Select DisplayName,PrimarySMTPAddress,sAMAccountName,alias | Export-Csv "c:\GALexport.csv"
This works just fine in Exchange Management Shell and deletes the previous report before creating a new one. However, when I set it up as a scheulded task, it does nothing.
The task is set up as follows:
Action - Start a Program
Program/ Script C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\PowerShell.exe
Add arguments -version 2.0 -NonInteractive -WindowStyle Hidden -command ". 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\RemoteExchange.ps1'; Connect-ExchangeServer -auto; d:\Scripts\GalExportReport.ps1"
This is set to run under my administrator account with the highest privileges and I have the logon as batch right.
Unfortunately, when I run it as a scheduled task, nothing happens. The last run result is (0x0) and in the history it says 'task completed', but no report is produced. Can anyone advise please?

Does it delete the c:\GALexport.csv file? If not, then its not even executing the ps1 script...
- Open cmd prompt and run below command to confirm that there isn't any typo or any other small error...
C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\PowerShell.exe -version
2.0 -NonInteractive -WindowStyle Hidden -command ". 'C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\RemoteExchange.ps1'; Connect-ExchangeServer -auto; d:\Scripts\GalExportReport.ps1"
- If above works then something wrong with task scheduler configuration...
Blog |
Get Your Exchange Powershell Tip of the Day from here

GPOTool Says Errors but Version numbers are matching

Hi,
I ran GPOTool against my domain and the results showed some errors but I cant actually understand the errors. It says sysvol version mismatch but then it lists out the policies and the the sysvol / DS version numbers are correct?
What am I missing here?
Patrick
Example shown below:
Policy {04002DE0-0A94-49FF-B784-F8DB3EC447FB}
Friendly name: Proxy Settings
Error: Server01.domainname.com - Server02.domainname.com sysvol mismatch
DC: Server01.domainname.com
Friendly name: Proxy Settings
Created: 25/10/2011 09:35:08
Changed: 08/05/2014 14:11:09
DS version: 14(user) 0(machine)
Sysvol version: 14(user) 0(machine)
Flags: 2 (user side enabled; machine side disabled)
User extensions: [{A2E30F80-D7DE-11D2-BBDE-00C04F86AE3B}{FC715823-C5FB-11D1-9EEF-00A0C90347FF}]
Machine extensions: not found
Functionality version: 2

Hi Patrick,
How is the issue going? Have we followed the suggestions provided by Don and gbillig to troubleshoot the issue?
In addition, the following two threads also focused on GPO Sysvol and DS version mismatch and can be referred to for more information.
GPOTool sysvol version mismatch
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6bbde7c8-0169-4879-946d-033e77970951/gpotool-sysvol-version-mismatch?forum=winserverDS
Sysvol Version mismatch
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4e181cc8-7bec-46cf-b5b4-675479c01b36/sysvol-version-mismatch?forum=winserverGP
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

Exchange 2010 RTM Analyzer giving domain prep error but version number is correct?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for