Exchange 2010 Shared mailbox permissions gone

In Exchange2010, I created a shared mailbox yesterday, then granted several groups and individuals "full access permissions" to the Shared mailbox.
When I arrived at work this morning and looked at the permissions, all the permissions  I had assigned were gone, except for a single individual. 
I re-applied the same permissions and checked them an hour later and they were gone again.  I thought it may be related to the groups, so I selected several individuals and gave them Full Access Permissions to the Shared Mailbox.  I checked
that some time later to discover that several individuals were missing again..  
What might cause this to happen

Hi,
As Willard suggested, please check if these problematic mailboxes are members of Domain Admins or Enterprise Admins. Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins are assigned the explicit Deny permissions for Send As and Receive as on the main Exchange Organization
object in AD. If you want to grant them full access permission, you need to remove the explicit Deny permissions.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2013 - Shared Mailbox Permissions

    Here is what I am trying to do. I would like to create a shared mailbox in exchange 2013 for time off requests for my employees. I will have the mailbox to be something like
    [email protected] If an employee is sick or requesting time off, they can email this shared mailbox or send a meeting request.
    I would then like the ability for ALL employees to be able to have read access to the mailbox and Calendar associated with it, and I would like to have managers have Full access to it and to be able to approve calendar requests so that they are entered into
    the calendar.
    Is this possible? How can I set read only to the inbox and calendar for a shared mailbox? I would also like to be able to have the shared mailboxes automatically added to all user's Outlook.
    Thanks!

    Simply grant Full Access to the managers.  Then for everyone else you can grant read only access to just the Calendar.
    Here is an example on how to do this -
    http://exchangeshare.wordpress.com/2009/07/07/how-to-setup-read-only-mailbox-in-exchange-20032007/.
    Let me know if that works.
    JAUCG - Please remeber to mark replies as helpful if they were or as answered if I provided a solution.

  • Exchange 2007 shared mailbox

    How do you connect an exchange 2007 shared mailbox to your iphone?  Normal "user" mailboxes work just fine.  Is this supported by Apple and or Microsoft?

    Hi
    You can not control this behaviour from Exchange. This is controlled by Outlook. 
    Outlook chooses the from address from what additional mailbox you are replying from (just as you see :-))
    There are a lot of registry tweaks for Outlook, but I don't think there are one to control this.
    I see 3 possible sollutions.
    1.    The users can choose them self 
    2.    You give the users "Send As" permissions on the mailbox
    3.    you use this tool
    http://www.ivasoft.biz/setfrom2013.shtml
    BR
    Steen

  • Weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes - allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms

    Hi,
    we are facing weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes
    it allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms.Sometime we are not getting acceptance or declined mail but and we could see our meetings has been booked at slot.
    for e.g.
    User A booked room1 with weekly recurrence for time 4pm to 5pm., and User B made his  booking other day,without realizing that user A meeting is exists.
    Neither of user A nor user B got declined/rejected emails.
    please sahre guidelines if anyone known to this issue.
    Note - Allow Conflict booking is disabled already :) but still have issue
    Thanks,
    NPratik

    Hi,
    Just add more in this issue, following testing is done.
    referring results and conclusion, you will get better view on issue 
    ====================
    Test Case - 1
    User OnCloud/O365 - Pratik Nimbalkar
    Email ID - [email protected]
    ( same as UPN)
    Room Booking Scenario - Book Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - Accepted
    Room Booking Scenario for same slot- ReBook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - Declined
    Conclusion = working fine
    ==================
    Test Case - 2
    User OnCloud/O365 - Testsm
    Email ID - [email protected]
    ( different from UPN)
    Room Booking Scenario - Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results - No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
    But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
    Room Booking Scenario for same slot- Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
    Results -No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
    But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
    =========================
    Conclusion = There is issue with booking room and not getting response while user is
    @abc.my id.
    ======================
    Note = for all other on premise users those are having @abc.co.in
    and @abc.my it is working fine. Users are getting respective correct reply from room mailboxes.
    This issue seems with only on cloud
    @abc.my users

  • Mailbox Permissions Exchange 2010 forcing mailbox on outlook profile.

    Hi,
    We currently have a user that uses outlook 2010, along with exchange 2010. He currently uses two mail profiles on his outlook.
    Profile 1 & Profile 2.
    Profile 1 consists of his primary inbox. Profile 2 consists of a few shared mailboxes, along with 3 staff members.
    When we add full permissions to the user to another 3 mailboxes 2010 makes this automatically appear for the user, casuing it to show on profile 1. Is there a way to stop this auto mapping and only add them to the second mailbox?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    We can use the “-Automapping” switch in the following command:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh529943(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Thanks,
    Simon Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 users cannot open Exchange 2013 shared mailbox

    Title says it all.
    We're in the process of migrating 1000+ mailboxes to Exchange 2013. A number of shared mailboxes have been migrated, but those users still on 2010 cannot open them.
    Is this just how it is, or is there a way around it?

    Hi,
    I tested in my lab, if the shared mailbox is on Exchange 2010, I could open this shared mailbox successfully. Then I moved this shared mailbox to Exchange 2013, after that, I couldn’t open it anymore, I got the following error:
    Besides, I tried to open a shared mailbox on Exchange 2013 which was not moved from Exchange 2010, it is the same error message.
    Based on the test, it seems that Exchange 2010 users can’t open shared mailbox on Exchange 2013. So I recommend you move those users to Exchange 2013.
    Best regards,
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Outlook 2010 shared mailbox in cache mode not updating Inbox automatically

    I have a user who has XP on his desktop, running Outlook 2010, connecting to a Exchange 2010 w/SP2.  I recently added a shared mailbox for him to monitor. I did it the old way by adding additional mailbox to his client (outlook 2010) pc.. I understand
    now  that in 2010 SP1 or greater that you can simply do this from the exchange server by granting full access permissions.  Either way, the user sees the mailbox and gets email in the shared mailbox ONLY when he clicks on the inbox and
    clicks on Update Folder. For some reason it is not auto updating new email. His personal account works fine, meaning when a new email is received it comes in and you see new mail.  The account is in cache mode and I've looked at other shared
    mailboxs that are working fine and the settings look the same? I'm not sure why this shared mailbox is not updating? 
    William McConnell

    I can see this is an old thread but I have a relevant question.
    This workaround does indeed work but what else is possible to do? The cashed mode is more or less necessary when working with large shared mailboxes.
    Niklas

  • Exchange 2010 Sharing a calendar using OWA prompts for Credentials

    Hi,
    We have a mixed Exchange 2003/Exchange 2010 environment while we migrate our mailboxes over to Exchange 2010.
    We use code that is used to connect to meeting room calendars still on Exchange 2003and then display the information on big tv screen at the entrance to the building.
    An example of the code is:
    R1calURL = "http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/managing-internet-calendar-sharing-exchange-server-2010-service-pack-1-part1.html to
    try and get it working.
    The code then gets various other pieces of information from the calendar which is used to display the correct information.
    I have a couple of questions:
    1) Is this method still valid or should we be using a different way of acheiving this (EWS or Internet Calendar Sharing?)
    2) We use forms based authentication for OWA.  I have had a look at Internet Calendar Sharing but when I enter the URL for the shared mailbox I am always being asked to enter credentials.  I have configured the mailbox I am connecting to so default
    has reviewer and anonymous has reviewer permissions.  I have also configured the OWA external URL the same as the Internal URL and created a new anonymous sharing policy in the EMC and applied this to the shared mailbox.  I used the following link
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/managing-internet-calendar-sharing-exchange-server-2010-service-pack-1-part1.html to try and get it working.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Matt

    Hi Matt,
    If the shared calendar is opened from OWA directly from a URL, please configure the Outlook Web App virtual directory to use Integrated Windows authentication. Integrated Windows authentication lets users who've already logged on by using
    their Active Directory account use Outlook Web App without having to enter their credentials again. For more information about it, please refer to:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232199(v=exchg.141).aspx
    To configure it, please do the following steps:
    1. Open EMC, expand Microsoft Exchange On-Premises (<ServerName>).
    2. Expand Server Configuration, and click on
    Client Access.
    3. Select the desired Client Access server on the right panel, and double click on
    owa (Default Web Site) on the Outlook Web App tab.
    4. In Authentication tab, select Use one or more standard authentication methods and check Integrated Windows authentication.
    5. Click Apply.
    Please note the warning to restart IIS service and change the corresponding configuration for ECP virtual directory in the same web site.
    Regards,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 - New-Mailbox - A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument '-PrimarySmtpAddress'.

    Hi,
    I am currently writing a powershell script that utilizes the new-mailbox command of EMS to create a shared mailbox.
    I am connecting to EMS via a remote PSSession object.
    When I try and specify an alternative SMTP address via the -PrimarySmtpAddress paramater I get the error
    " A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument '-PrimarySmtpAddress'.
    I have confirmed that the version of Exchange 2010 installed on the server should have this parameter - Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
    An example command :-
    New-Mailbox -Shared -Name "SharedMailbox_test" -Alias "testsharedmailbox" -DisplayName "SharedMailbox_test" -UserPrincipalName "[email protected]" -OrganizationalUnit "OU=Mailboxes,OU=Accounts,DC=domain,DC=com"
    -Database "DB1" -PrimarySmtpAddress "[email protected]" -force
    Has anyone else experienced this behavior?
    Steve.
    Just a good old boy, never meaning no harm

    Hi Rich,
    That was my initial thought too, so I triple-checked my command to see if it was a simple syntax error - it wasn't.
    On further investigation I compared the list of parameters available in a DEV EMS session (on where I know the command works) against the one in PROD where the problem occurs.  Both sessions are running the same version of EMS.
    I ran the following to get a list of parameter names in both sessions :-
    $a = gcm New-Mailbox
    $a.Parameters.Keys | sort
    Here's the results :-
    DEV EMS (working)
    Prod EMS (missing)
    AccountDisabled
    ActiveSyncMailboxPolicy
    AddressBookPolicy
    Alias
    Alias
    Arbitration
    ArbitrationMailbox
    Archive
    ArchiveDatabase
    ArchiveDomain
    AsJob
    AsJob
    Confirm
    Confirm
    Database
    Database
    Debug
    Debug
    Discovery
    DisplayName
    DisplayName
    DomainController
    DomainController
    Equipment
    Equipment
    ErrorAction
    ErrorAction
    ErrorVariable
    ErrorVariable
    FirstName
    FirstName
    Force
    Force
    ImmutableId
    Initials
    Initials
    LastName
    LastName
    LinkedCredential
    LinkedDomainController
    LinkedMasterAccount
    ManagedFolderMailboxPolicy
    ManagedFolderMailboxPolicyAllowed
    ModeratedBy
    ModerationEnabled
    Name
    Name
    Office
    OrganizationalUnit
    OrganizationalUnit
    OutBuffer
    OutBuffer
    OutVariable
    OutVariable
    Password
    Phone
    PrimarySmtpAddress
    RemoteArchive
    RemotePowerShellEnabled
    ResetPasswordOnNextLogon
    ResetPasswordOnNextLogon
    ResourceCapacity
    RetentionPolicy
    RoleAssignmentPolicy
    Room
    Room
    SamAccountName
    SamAccountName
    SendModerationNotifications
    Shared
    Shared
    SharingPolicy
    ThrottlingPolicy
    UserPrincipalName
    UserPrincipalName
    Verbose
    Verbose
    WarningAction
    WarningAction
    WarningVariable
    WarningVariable
    WhatIf
    WhatIf
    It might be a permissions-based issue, but I don't own either EMS session so can't test personally.
    I will keep investigating and update here once I have some further information.
    Regards,
    Steve.
    Just a good old boy, never meaning no harm

  • Issue with Update Rollup 5 for Exchange 2010 SP3 - Mailboxes that were auto mapped not working

    Below is  my response in another thread but creating a new one in the hopes that someone has the same issue and a solution besides mine below.
    Ever since we installed Update Rollup 5 for SP3 Exchange 2010 mailboxes that were auto mapped are not accessible. They all get the same error.
    Cannot expand the folder. The set of folders cannot be opened. The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange has failed.
    What I have been doing is removing the users permission, then adding them back using the noautomap switch in Powershell. After doing that, the user manually adds the mailbox and all is well.
    Just a note here, I suspect it may have something to do with the version of Outlook 2010. We are running an older version here. I think only SP1 with no other incremental updates. Office is up to SP2. Also, one of the users I was working with could not access
    the mailbox no matter what we tried but she can walk over to another workstation and open Outlook and access the very same mailbox so that pretty much proves its software related particularly with Outlook.
    I cannot reproduce the problem on a workstation (XP) with a newer version of Outlook.
    This has been wearing me out and I suspected the Update Rollup all long. Now I am confident as others are having the same problem. If you find out anything on how to fix this other than the steps above, let me know.

    Not sure why it was suggested to use the auto mapping feature to grant permissions because that is the component that is causing the issue. Also, there is nothing wrong with the auto configuration because the user can access their own mailbox just fine and
    also select mailboxes in their Outlook that were NOT auto mapped.
    With that said, here is how I fixed them all.
    Remove the permissions using the Exchange Console. Don't forget Send As
    Wait about 15 minutes. The mailbox should disappear from the users Outlook
    Open an Exchange PowerShell window and run the following command:
    .\add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1 -Identity mailbox -User user -AccessRights FullAccess
    Have the user add the mailbox to their Outlook using the manual process.
    All is well....
    If you don't have the PS script add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1, you can download it. I stumbled across it a few years ago and use it all the time. If you can't find it, just use the Exchange built in command for adding mailbox folder permissions but
    specify automap $false.
    The idea here is to grant the user access without auto mapping.

  • Exchange 2010 - Moving mailbox database from exchange 2010 server to another exchange 2010 server

    Hi,
    I have a current existing exchange server running on 2008 R2. apparently the partition that holds the mailbox database is getting full and i need to move some user mailboxes to another environment ( exchange 2010 running on 2008 R2). i transferred some users
    successfully to the new location, but am not able to transfer the rest. I am getting the errors:
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:00
    Erastus XXXXX
    Failed
    Error:
    The queue in 'MBX2010_STAFF' database already contains a move request for 'Erastus XXXXX', while AD reports the mailbox as not being moved. It is possible that someone created this move request recently, while targeting a different domain controller, and AD
    replication did not yet occur. You can examine this move request by running 'Get-MoveRequestStatistics -MoveRequestQueue 'MBX2010_STAFF' -MailboxGuid f8023bc7-9d65-4194-9f6b-10e4780558b5 -IncludeReport | fl'. If you believe this to be an abandoned move request,
    you can remove it by running 'Remove-MoveRequest -MoveRequestQueue 'MBX2010_STAFF' -MailboxGuid f8023bc7-9d65-4194-9f6b-10e4780558b5'.
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    'xxxxxxxx.co.ke/Training Department/XXXXXXX/XXXXXXX/Erastus XXXXX' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'OFFICE_STAFF_MB_DB' -BadItemLimit '0'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:00
    AND
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:01
    George XXXXX
    Failed
    Error:
    Service 'net.tcp://win-u5bjh2oamaa.xxxxxxxxx.co.ke/Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService' encountered an exception. Error: MapiExceptionNoAccess: Unable to open message store. (hr=0x80070005, ec=-2147024891)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 18969   EcDoRpcExt2 called [length=207]
        Lid: 27161   EcDoRpcExt2 returned [ec=0x80070005][length=202][latency=0]
        Lid: 32881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 50035 
        Lid: 64625   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 1494    ---- Remote Context Beg ----
        Lid: 26426   ROP: ropLogon [254]
        Lid: 56503 
        Lid: 12716   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 20794 
        Lid: 28474   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 22330   dwParam: 0x0        Msg: 14.01.0270.001:CPLSERVER
        Lid: 1750    ---- Remote Context End ----
        Lid: 23354   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25913 
        Lid: 21817   ROP Failure: 0x80070005
        Lid: 26297 
        Lid: 16585   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 32441 
        Lid: 1706    StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 24761 
        Lid: 20665   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25785 
        Lid: 29881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
    Exception details: MapiExceptionNoAccess (80070005): MapiExceptionNoAccess: Unable to open message store. (hr=0x80070005, ec=-2147024891)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 18969   EcDoRpcExt2 called [length=207]
        Lid: 27161   EcDoRpcExt2 returned [ec=0x80070005][length=202][latency=0]
        Lid: 32881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 50035 
        Lid: 64625   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 1494    ---- Remote Context Beg ----
        Lid: 26426   ROP: ropLogon [254]
        Lid: 56503 
        Lid: 12716   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 20794 
        Lid: 28474   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 22330   dwParam: 0x0        Msg: 14.01.0270.001:CPLSERVER
        Lid: 1750    ---- Remote Context End ----
        Lid: 23354   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25913 
        Lid: 21817   ROP Failure: 0x80070005
        Lid: 26297 
        Lid: 16585   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 32441 
        Lid: 1706    StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 24761 
        Lid: 20665   StoreEc: 0x80070005
        Lid: 25785 
        Lid: 29881   StoreEc: 0x80070005
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    'xxxxxxxxxx.co.ke/Training Department/xxxxxx/xxxxxxx/George xxxxxxx' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'OFFICE_STAFF_MB_DB' -BadItemLimit '0'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:01
    I have all the proper rights.
    YOUR ASSISTANCE WILL BE HIGHLY APPRECIATED. THANX :)

    0x80070005 is pretty standard access denied entries.  I would start digging into ACLs on a handful
    of mailboxes.
    Is there another Admin that can give it a shot to test their permissions vs yours?
    - If you find my post to be helpful, or the answer, please mark it appropriately. Thank you.
    Chris Ream

  • Outlook / Exchange 2010 shared calendars performance

    Hi, we are using Outlook 2010 connecting to Exchange 2010 over a WAN (120ms average RTT). Cached mode is forced on all clients. Our users are finding that performance of shared calendars is very poor in "online" mode. However as they are all using Outlook
    2010, checking "download shared folders" means that ALL secondary mailbox folders are cached and we don't want this to happen. Users are typically PAs who have been granted full mailbox access to their exec's mailbox. These users may have several shared calendars
    open at once which makes the situation even worse.
    Is there a way that we can revert Outlook 2010 to the previous 2007 behaviour whereby with secondary mailboxes only the calendar / contacts etc are cached? I have seen articles referring to a reg value "CacheOthersMail" that can be added but this seems to
    have no effect on a couple of clients we've tried - if the "download shared folders" option is checked, everything is still cached, and if it's unchecked, everything switches to "online".
    Any help appreciated,
    Nick

    Yes, setting that registry key to 0 should do the trick. You might need to recreate the mail profile though or recreate the ost-file to directly get rid of what is currently being cached.
    As you've currently forced the caching by a GPO, check your policy keys as well.
    See; http://www.msoutlook.info/question/561
    Robert Sparnaaij
    [MVP-Outlook]
    Outlook guides and more: HowTo-Outlook.com
    Outlook Quick Tips: MSOutlook.info

  • Exchange 2010 Room Calendar Permissions are too permissive when Default is set to None.

    Help! Room Calendar permissions are too permissive when Default is set to None.
    We are a brand new Exchange 2010 shop, and have setup several conference rooms.  Many of them are restricted to specific groups to book via In-Policy Requests using Resource Booking Attendant.  The Room Calendar permissions for most
    rooms shows only two options for the Default access: None and Full Details.  Default is set to None, yet if someone opens the room calendar in Outlook (& they are not part of the In-Policy restrictions) they are able to see the full meeting details
    (even open the meeting for full details).  How is this possible when by default they should not have any access as it is set to None?  Some rooms would not be a problem for clients to see the details, but some rooms like Executive rooms need to be
    locked down so that others cannot see the room details - None.
    I also found this, although it did not make a difference.  If I create an Outlook profile for the room and login as the room calendar in Outlook, go to File, Options, Calendar, Resource Scheduling, Set Permissions I get different default options:
    None, "Free/Busy time", "Free/Busy time, subject, location" and Full Details.  Why do I have more options in this view rather than the Room Calendar Permissions?  I looked at two rooms and both Default options were set to "Free/Busy
    time", so I changed these settings to None.  Still the clients can view the full room calendar details.  What are we missing to get the room calendar locked down so it is not displaying details to everyone?

    Only the default groups and Exchange Admins have Full Access to these items, so that is not the issue.
    -MailboxFolderPermission 1RP07AWest:\Calendar cmdlet and it shows the same access I see when I open the calendar in Outlook and view the Permissions as shown below - Default is set to None.
    As I stated in my last reply the only thing that finally forced it to be blocked is changing the Resource Scheduling permissions under Options > Calendar for that room mailbox.  If I have to do that for each room calendar, it's going to
    take considerable time to change each one.  Is there a cmdlet to allow me to access and change that setting as well?
    RunspaceId   : ea4ebc26-1d22-4a7d-b115-1b609099bae3
    FolderName   : Calendar
    User         : Default
    AccessRights : {None}
    Identity     : Default
    IsValid      : True
    ObjectState  : New
    RunspaceId   : ea4ebc26-1d22-4a7d-b115-1b609099bae3
    FolderName   : Calendar
    User         : Anonymous
    AccessRights : {None}
    Identity     : Anonymous
    IsValid      : True
    ObjectState  : New

  • Exchange 2010 Send As Permissions Dropping

    We are finding send as rights are dropping even though they are still appearing in the send As Rights Permissions box. This has been happeneing intermittently for a few weeks now, has anyone experienced something similar?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    As per the information and details provided by you, Send As permission is Dropping in Exchange 2010.
    Please follow these steps to setup Send As Permission in Exchange Server2010: -
    In Exchange 2010, Click on Start>
    Programs> Microsoft Exchange> and then click
    Active Directory Users and Computers.
    In the View menu, click on the
    Advanced Features.
    Expend Users, then right click the Mailbox Owner object where you want to grant the permission, and then click
    Properties.
    Click on the Security tab, and then click on
    Advanced.
    In the Access Control Setting for Mailbox Owner dialog box, click on Add.
    In the Select User, Computer, or Group dialog box, click the user account or the group that you want to grant Send As permission to and then click
    OK.
    In the Permission entry for Mailbox Owner dialog box, click
    This Object Only in the Apply onto list.
    In the Permission list, locate
    Send As, and then click to select the Allow check box.
    Click OK three times to close the dialog boxes.
    I hope this information will be helpful for you.
    Thanks and regards
    Ashish@S 
    Ashish@V

  • Exchange 2013 Shared Mailbox Get-MailboxSentItemsConfiguration SP1 Help

    Hello
    My Setup
    Server1: Server 2012 Standard + Exchange 2013 CU2 Standard (MBX+CAS)
    Server2: Server 2012 Standard + Exchange 2013 CU2 Standard (MBX+CAS)
    DAG Enable
    I am having problems with Shared mailboxes, when sending E-mail from the Shared mailbox the sent E-mail will show up in the recipients Sent Items insted of the Shared mailbox sent Items.
    I know that in Exchange 2010 Later SP and RU there where a PowerShell command that could send a copy to the Shared mailbox Sent Items (Get-MailboxSentItemsConfiguration)
    but it doesn't seem to be there anymore, does anyone know if the cmdlet is back in CU3 or SP1? will it come back?
    there is a workaround (Registry) but it doesn't help us, not for our environment.
    Can I set this up by Outlook rules or maybe some kind of forwarding?
    If you have any experience with this, feel free to give some advice.
    Thank You very much!

    Hi,
    *.MailboxSentItemsConfiguration has not been brought back in CU3 or CU4/SP1 and I don't know if it ever will be.
    If DelegateSentItemsStyle configured in the registry is not an option for you, then using multiple Exchange accounts in the same Outlook Profile might be. The support for that was added in Outlook 2010 and personally, I like that option a lot.
    Martina Miskovic

Maybe you are looking for