Exchange 2010 SP2 : Move calander entries and Task items from Archive mailbox to current active mailbox.

Hi,
After upgrade the exchange 2010 SP1 to SP2, all users calendar and task items entries also moved to archive mailbox from user's active mailboxes.
We like to move 90 days older emails to archive mailbox but not calendar & task items to be moved.
Any solution to move back those older archive calendar and task items to active mailbox users and also any settings to stop further to move calendar & task items to archive mailbox in SP2?
Thanks
MD

Hi,
Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4 added support for Calendar and Task Retiontion polices. For more information about that see the below blog post which also includes a workaround if you don't what these folders to be processed by MRM.
Calendar and Tasks Retention Tag Support in Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/08/14/calendar-and-tasks-retention-tag-support-in-exchange-2010-sp2-ru4.aspx
PS. Exchange 2010 SP2 is no longer supported.
Martina Miskovic

Similar Messages

  • Integration b/w Exchange 2010 SP2 and Exchange 9.1.1.7 connector

    Has any succesfully integrated exchange 2010 sp2 with 9.1.1.7 conncetor ..
    Sp2 is not in the certifcation list in the connector documentation .. just want to check if any one has done this before ..
    Thanks

    Hi Sembee,
    We did this already.
    We got it working now after doing above but with the shell.
    First we confirmed if the mailbox is disabled with the following command: Get-MailboxStatistics -Database MBD01 | Where { $_.DisconnectReason -eq "Disabled" } | Format-List LegacyDN, DisplayName, MailboxGUID, DisconnectReason
    It did show as disabled but when we try to enable it we got the following: This task does not support recipients of this type.
    So we disabled the mailbox in the shell, enable it again and it was fine.
    Get-MailboxStatistics -Database MBD01 | Where { $_.DisconnectReason -eq "Disabled" } | Format-List LegacyDN, DisplayName, MailboxGUID, DisconnectReason helped us, cause in the EMC exchange showed the user as enabled.
    Thanks

  • Move Exchange 2010 SP2 from Physical to Virtual

    I am currently running Exchange 2010 on a server which is hugely underutilised so am hoping to virtualize Exchange and other servers on this machine.
    What is the best way to move/convert Exchange?
    I will require this machine to be reinstalled with Server 2008 R2 server core to run only Hyper-V.
    I thought of backing up (to multiple locations, just in case!!), reinstalling the server with core + Hyper-V, then restoring the backup to a new VM.
    Or should I use the Sysinternals Disk2vhd tool first. Convert to VHD, then reinstall server with core and add the VHD as a new VM?
    The Exchange databases and logs are on a separate RAID 5 array which would be left untouched so would making this disk available to the Exchange VM would allow it to continue where it left off after the server was restored from backup to the new VM?
    I also read it is not recommended to use P2V tools with Exchange, but since I am required to reinstall the machine what choice do I have? In that case should I install Exchange on another server, move all databases and users to that server, reinstall old server,
    install Exchange VM, then move all databases and users onto the new VM?
    The more I think about this, the more my head spins, so any insight is appreciated.
    Thanks.

    hi,
    >>>Could I do all this reconfiguration using a trial license on the other server?
    Details of products and services, you can contact Microsoft product and service center.
    http://support.microsoft.com/gp/contact_microsoft_customer_serv?&fr=1
    hope can help you
    thanks,
    castin
    CastinLu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 sp2 emc initialization error using "kerberos" authentication failed

    We use exchange 2010 SP2.
    We have 2 management stations, both w2k8 R2 SP1.
    I have one mangement station on which the emc and ems works ok.
    On the other management staiton (which is also in another ad site) the emc and ems don't work.
    I get the following error message : The attempt to connect to
    http://fqdnCasServer/PowerShell using "Kerberos" authentication failed: Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : Access is denied. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
    I have checked the time on the management station and on the exchange server and this is ok.
    It is not a permissions issue because the user functions ok on the other management station.
    On the bad management station I can open the emc once and after a minute I get an error message and the message access denied. From then on I can't connect any more.
    What am I doing wrong?
    Anyone any tips?
    Thanks,
    JB 

    This is what I get in the eventlog of the bad management station.
    Log Name:      MSExchange Management
    Source:        MSExchange CmdletLogs
    Date:          1/10/2012 11:39:27
    Event ID:      6
    Task Category: (1)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      Server.domain.com
    Description:
    The description for Event ID 6 from source MSExchange CmdletLogs cannot be found. Either the component that raises this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.
    If the event originated on another computer, the display information had to be saved with the event.
    The following information was included with the event:
    Get-ExchangeServer
    {Identity=Servername}
    Domain/ou/ou/ou/ou/username
    Exchange Management Console-Local
    3080
    22
    00:00:00.3593888
    View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Global Catalog: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ FQDN DN }'
    Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.ManagementObjectNotFoundException: The operation couldn't be performed because object 'FQDN MGMTSTATION' couldn't be found on 'FQDN DC'.
    Context
    the message resource is present but the message is not found in the string/message table
    Event Xml:
    <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
      <System>
        <Provider Name="MSExchange CmdletLogs" />
        <EventID Qualifiers="49152">6</EventID>
        <Level>2</Level>
        <Task>1</Task>
        <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
        <TimeCreated SystemTime="2012-10-01T09:39:27.000000000Z" />
        <EventRecordID>11</EventRecordID>
        <Channel>MSExchange Management</Channel>
        <Computer>FQDN MGMT STATION</Computer>
        <Security />
      </System>
      <EventData>
        <Data>Get-ExchangeServer</Data>
        <Data>{Identity=MGMT STATION}</Data>
        <Data>domain/ou/ou/ou/ou/username</Data>
        <Data>
        </Data>
        <Data>
        </Data>
        <Data>Exchange Management Console-Local</Data>
        <Data>3080</Data>
        <Data>
        </Data>
        <Data>22</Data>
        <Data>00:00:00.3593888</Data>
        <Data>View Entire Forest: 'True', Configuration Domain Controller: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Global Catalog: 'FQDN DC', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ FQDN DC }'</Data>
        <Data>Microsoft.Exchange.Configuration.Tasks.ManagementObjectNotFoundException: The operation couldn't be performed because object 'FQDN MGMT STATION' couldn't be found on 'FQDN DC'.</Data>
        <Data>Context</Data>
        <Data>
        </Data>
      </EventData>
    </Event>

  • Outlook 2010 SP1 Profile Does Not Update After Moving Mailbox Between Exchange 2010 SP2 Sites

    I am working on a large mailbox migration from one AD site to another. 
    Exchange version at both sites:Exchange 2010 SP2
    Two Mailbox Servers: MBX01 in site A / MBX02 in site B
    (There is a DAG but keeping this simple)
    Two CAS Arrays: CASA.domain.com / CASB.domain.com
    The RPCClientAccessServer property is set accordingly.  Where MBX01 is set to CASA.domain.com and MBX02 is set to CASB.domain.com
    Clients:Outlook 2010 SP1
    Scenario: I successfully move a mailbox from Site A to Site B.  The Outlook client does not automatically update its server settings to point to the new cas array (CASB.domain.com) and continues to connect to the old CAS server (CASA.domain.com).
    I have seen a few articles regarding this pointing to workarounds such as:
    - repairing the outlook profile on the client
    - delete the existing outlook profile
    - run a script to update the prf file (re-cache's email at the client)
    I am interested in knowing if anyone else has experienced this, what their solution was for a large migration and if any roll-ups or service packs have possibly fixed this problem.
    I would also like to know if you have seen this affect ActiveSync devices.  I am getting mixed results in my tests and thought it may be contributed toward different device types, mobile os versions, etc...
    I have posted this to the Exchange 2010 forum as well, just wasn't sure where to start.
    Thanks.
    Mike

    Hi,
    Seems you got several replies in the thread below that you posted in Exchange forum:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/68ae67c1-59f5-44bb-aadc-0aea3f72ad2d/outlook-profile-not-updated-to-new-cas-array-after-mailbox-move-between-sites?forum=exchange2010#68ae67c1-59f5-44bb-aadc-0aea3f72ad2d
    Please come back to the thread above and check if the replies are helpful.
    Since this issue is more related to Exchange, we can provide rarely assistance on this problem. If you need any help on Outlook client side, please don't hesitate to let me know.
    I would appreciate it if you could post the solution here when you found it, so that other community members who have same question in this forum will benefit from it.
    Best Regards,
    Steve Fan
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 Sp2 - Does not audit Shared calender access

    I have Exchange 2010 sp2 , I have enabled mailbox audit on few mailbox , as well as MSExchange IS logs for logon event to expert.(event ID 1016), 
    I am trying to get folderbind events , from shared calender access , like Non-owner mailbox event or anything that I can run audit get the detail if non-owner accessed the calender or mailbox folder etc..
    I found changes are logged like create , delete or any changes but not folderbind
    i have following on to few mailboxes.
    AuditEnabled     : True
    AuditLogAgeLimit : 90.00:00:00
    AuditAdmin       : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, FolderBind, SendAs, SendOnBehalf, Create}
    AuditDelegate    : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, FolderBind, SendAs, SendOnBehalf, Create}
    AuditOwner       : {Update, Move, MoveToDeletedItems, SoftDelete, HardDelete, Create}
    Can some one please  help me to find what is missing to get folderbind  audit events when any non-owner access anything like shared calender etc..
    Thank you 

    Hi ANdy,
    Yes we have the followed the same commands as mentioned in both the article and the PPT as well. But i got the errors as mentioned in my thread above.
    Databases were not getting mounted, even when i tried the resume command still it failed.
    regards
    abubakar
    Md.Abubakar Noorani IT Systems Engineer Serco Ltd.
    Ok, because that is the part I wasnt clear about. I assume that the servers in the DR site are not set for automatic activation, so in order for them to mount, you would have to clear that block.
    When you tried to move the databases to the DR site, you got the same error message as you got when you ran the restore-databaseavailibilitygroup command?
    So, is everything back to normal? Did you run test-replicationhealth before you failed over?
    Also, anything of use in the cluster logs? “cluster log /g”.  
    I assume the MAPI bindings and NICS are set correctly since this worked before.
    Twitter!:

  • SBS2011 (Exchange 2010 SP2) - limiting cache size doesn't appear to work

    Hi All,
    Hoping for some clarification here, or extra input at least.  I know there are other posts about this topic such as
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbusinessserver/thread/5acb6e29-13b3-4e70-95d9-1a62fc9304ac but these have been
    incorrectly marked as answer in my opinion.
    To recap the issue.  The Exchange 2010 store.exe process uses a lot of memory.  So much in fact it has a negative performance impact on the server (sluggish access to the desktop etc).  You can argue about this all day - it's by design
    and shouldn't be messed with etc but the bottom line is that it does use too much memory and it does need tweaked.  I know this because if you simply restart the Information Store process (or reboot the server) it frees up the memory and the performance
    returns (until its cache is fully rebuilt that is).  I have verified this on 4 different fresh builds of SBS2011 over the last 6 months. (all on servers with 16GB RAM)
    I have scoured the internet for information on limiting how much memory exchange uses to cache the information store and most articles point back to the same two articles (http://eightwone.com/2011/04/06/limiting-exchange-2010-sp1-database-cache/
    and
    http://eightwone.com/2010/03/25/limiting-exchange-2010-database-cache) that deal with exchange 2010 and exchange 2010 SP1, notably not exchange 2010 SP2.  Ergo most articles are out of date since exchange 2010 SP2 has been released since these articles
    were posted.
    When testing with our own in house SBS2011 server (with exchange 2010 SP2) I have found that specifying the min, max and cache sizes in ADSIEDIT has varying results that are not in line with the results documented in the articles I mentioned above. 
    I suspect the behaviour of these settings has changed with the release of exchange 2010 SP2 (as it did between the initial release and SP1).
    Specifically here's what I have found using ADSIEDIT;
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSize to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin to a value - it always locks the store.exe process to using exactly this value.
    I have also tested using combinations of these settings with the result that the size and max size values are always ignored (and the store.exe process uses the maximum available amount of memory - thus causing the performance degradation) but as soon as
    you specify the min value it locks it to this value and it doesn't change.
    As a temporary solution on our in-house SBS2011 I have set the min value to 4GB and it appears to be running fine (only 15 mailboxes though).
    Anyone got some input on this ? thank you for your time.

    I concur with Erin. I'm seeing the same behaviour across all SBS2011 boxes, whether running SP1, SP2 or SP3.
    If a minimum value is set, the store cache size barely rises above the minumum. I have one server with 32GB RAM. Store.exe was using 20GB of RAM, plus all the other Exchange services which total 4GB+. That left virtually no free RAM and trying to do
    anything else on the server was sluggish at best.
    All the advise is that setting a maximum alone has no effect and a minimum must be set too. But when set, the store cache size barely rises above the minimum. I have set a 4GB minimum and 16GB max, but 5 days later it's still using only slightly more than
    4GB and there's 8GB free. Now the server as a whole is responsive, but doing anything with Exchange is sluggish.
    Just saying leave Exchange to manage itself is not an answer. The clue is in the name - Small Business Server. It's not Exchange Only Server - there are other tasks an SBS must handle so leaving Exchange to run rampant is not an option. Besides, there are
    allegedly means to manage the Exchange cache size - they just don't apparently work!
    I'm guessing nobody has an answer to this so the only solution is to effectively fix the cache size to a sensible value by setting min and max to the same value.
    [email protected] IT

  • Unity 5.0 compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2?

    Has anyone out there tested Unity 5.0 (1) with Exchange 2010 SP2? Did you have any problems? I understand that Unity 5.x has gone end of maintenance, and it has not been officially been tested for compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2 for unified messaging. I don't anticipate being able to upgrade Unity until next year, but the sytem admins want to upgrade from Exchange SP1 to SP2 sooner. Thanks.

    Has anyone out there tested Unity 5.0 (1) with Exchange 2010 SP2? Did you have any problems? I understand that Unity 5.x has gone end of maintenance, and it has not been officially been tested for compatibility with Exchange 2010 SP2 for unified messaging. I don't anticipate being able to upgrade Unity until next year, but the sytem admins want to upgrade from Exchange SP1 to SP2 sooner. Thanks.

  • EMC Does Not Show All Databases Copies Information on DAG - Exchange 2010 SP2

    Hi guys,
    Really need your help here, suddenly my customer complain that they cant see any information on database copies on their Active Copy DAG Exchange server, for another DAG members, the database copies information is visible. After do some readings, I found
    this related to Exchange 2010 SP1 known issue. 
    http://workinghardinit.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/emc-does-not-show-all-database-copies-after-upgrade-to-exchange-2010-sp1-still-investigating/
    But, for my environment, there is Exchange 2010 SP2. I have no idea on this issue since there is no error log thrown out from the event viewer. I already try to restart the server itself and the Microsoft Information services but no luck.

    Hi,
    Based on the description, your customers could see passive database copy information, but they couldn’t view the detail information such as state: Healthy in EMC.
    When did this issue begin?
    Please restart the AD topology service to check result.
    Since we have the information correctly on Exchange shell, please try to clear EMC cache and then open console to check if you can see database copy in EMC.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010 SP2 Upgradation in DR site

    Hi All,
    I am planning upgrade exchange 2010 SP2 from SP1in DR servers which is in different site of AD.
    I have already run the prepare schema and prepare ad in schema master which is in production site and it got replicated in DR Domain controllers.
    But, still i am not able to upgrade the server. The error says,
    :\Exch SP2>Setup /m:upgrade /InstallWindowsComponents /Hosting
    Welcome to Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Unattended Setup
    Preparing Exchange Setup
        Copying Setup Files                           COMPLETED
    The following server roles will be upgraded
    Languages
    Hub Transport Role
    Client Access Role
    Management Tools
    Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
        Configuring Prerequisites                                 COMPLETED
        Organization Checks                                      
    FAILED
         Setup needs to contact the Active Directory schema master but this computer
     is not in the same Active Directory site as the schema master (Default-First-Si
    te-Name).
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
        Language Pack Checks                                     
    COMPLETED
        Hub Transport Role Checks                                 FAILED
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
        Client Access Role Checks                                 FAILED
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
    The Exchange Server setup operation didn't complete. More details can be found
    in ExchangeSetup.log located in the <SystemDrive>:\ExchangeSetupLogs folder.
    Exchange Server setup encountered an error.
    Please let me know if you have options

    Hi All,
    I am planning upgrade exchange 2010 SP2 from SP1in DR servers which is in different site of AD.
    I have already run the prepare schema and prepare ad in schema master which is in production site and it got replicated in DR Domain controllers.
    But, still i am not able to upgrade the server. The error says,
    :\Exch SP2>Setup /m:upgrade /InstallWindowsComponents /Hosting
    Hi,
    If you run Get-OrganizationConfig | fl Name,objectversion in your DR-Site, what is the version number you see?
    If its not 14247, the schema has not been upgraded.
    /Hosting is not supported with SP2, so you need to leave that out.
    It might be better if you post in the forum
    Exchange 2010 for Hosters
    Some additional reading:
    Future of /Hosting Mode
    Martina Miskovic

  • Upgrade Exchange 2010 SP2 to SP3 getting fail

    Hi,
    I am trying to upgrade from exchange 2010 SP2 to SP3, but it getting failed.
    I have already run the prepare schema, prepare and domain prep in all domains and it got replicated in DR Domain controllers.
    But, still i am not able to upgrade the server. The error says,
    Preparing Exchange Setup
        Copying Setup Files                           COMPLETED
    The following server roles will be upgraded
    Languages
    Hub Transport Role
    Client Access Role
    Management Tools
    Performing Microsoft Exchange Server Prerequisite Check
        Configuring Prerequisites                                 COMPLETED
        Organization Checks                                      
    FAILED
         Setup needs to contact the Active Directory schema master but this computer
     is not in the same Active Directory site as the schema master (Default-First-Si
    te-Name).
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
        Language Pack Checks                                     
    COMPLETED
        Hub Transport Role Checks                                 FAILED
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
        Client Access Role Checks                                 FAILED
         Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     Exchange organization-level objects have been created but have not yet replicat
    ed to the local domain.  Wait for replication to complete and then run setup aga
    in.
    The Exchange Server setup operation didn't complete. More details can be found
    in ExchangeSetup.log located in the <SystemDrive>:\ExchangeSetupLogs folder.
    Exchange Server setup encountered an error.
    Thanks,
    San

    Hi,
    Schema updates should be done on a schema master or on a DC in the same AD site as the schema master. Once extended, the updates will replicated via AD replication. To narrow down the issue, I recommend you check if there is any event related to replication
    on domain controller holding schema master role.
    Is the schema master role in the same site as the Exchange server which you want to upgrade? If not, you can try to transfer FSMO role to a domain controller which is in the site where you want to install Exchange 2010 SP3 and then upgrade to check the result.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Applying Windows 2008 R2 SP1 on Exchange 2010 SP2 servers

    Hi All,
    Our current setup is Primary Site and DR site with a DAG.
    Primary site is having 2 Mailbox servers, 2 hubcas servers with an NLB and one CAS server for OWA.
    DR Site is having 1 mailbox server, one hubcas server and one CAS server.  All these exchange servers are SP2 with update roll up5.
    But the OS is Windows 2008 R2, need to apply Windows 2008 R2 SP1 on these servers, and what are things to be considered.
    Does this affect CAS servers IIS?
    Thanks,
    Kanishka.

    Agreed. One thing to mention - Win 2008 R2 needed SP1 a while back, no security updates have been released for a while.
    Exchange 2010 SP2 goes out of support next month. please plan to update to SP3 for Exchange 2010.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2013/10/08/save-the-date-end-of-exchange-2003-support-t-minus-6-months.aspx
    The details for that, and a link to the lifecycle page are in the above post.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Cross forest migration Exchange 2010 SP2 to Exchange 2010 SP2

    Hi,
    We are planning cross forest migration Exchange 2010 SP2 to Exchange 2010 SP2.
    Requesting you to please help us out for below scenario.
    Source Exchange 2010 SP2:- abc.com
    2AD, 2CAS & 2 MBX servers
    Database:- 4
    Total Users :- 3500
    Accepted Domains :- 8
    Total Data:- 5TB +
    Target Exchange 2010 SP2:- xyz.com
    Resource allocated same as above.
    Now we have to migrate users along with data to target forest xyz.com keeping both setup live, as moving 5TB + data will be a ongoing process and the same will take some time.
    With the guidelines mentioned in
    http://careexchange.in/cross-forest-migration-guide-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2010/#comment-14203 we are able to migrate test users along with data, but after migration the migrated user is not able to connect through MS Outlook even not able to login into
    OWA. It gives error “The Outlook Web App address
    https://mail.abc.com/owa is out of date.”
    Kindly let us know how to solve this issue.
    Kindly let me know if you want any more information from our end.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks and Regards, Shashank Kudi

    Hi Shashank,
    Do you have certificates properly installed and configured in the target Exchange?
    If not, Please configure certificate and import the certificate to the trusted root CA if you are using internal CA cert.
    Thanks, MAS
    Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Error 1603 when installing Rollup 4 for Exchange 2010 SP2

    Hi There,
    I have began upgrading our Exchange servers to Rollup 4 for Exchange 2010 SP2 last week and the first 3 servers all successfully installed it without any problems.  However I have hit a problem with my 4th server.
    I am receiving the 'common' error 1603 in my Application log and I have already ran through many potential fixes to this problem on various posts on this and other forums, but to no avail.
    I have tried the following without success:
    Turning off UAC
    Running from elevated CMD prompt
    Running from elevated Powershell command
    Removing and re-adding "Exchange Trusted Subsystem" from the Administrators group
    Re-downloading the RU4 install package to the local disk on the server
    Adding more RAM and CPU resources
    I have watched the installation process and it seems to update of the native assembly files and comes to the "Starting Services" process, with which it appears to do fine as I have watched the Services starting within Server Manager while this has been running,
    but then all of a sudden just begins "Rolling back actions".
    The only difference with this server to the others is the fact that a colleague of mine had to recover this server within the last 6 months and ran the Setup /m:RecoverServer command
    to do so, could this have anything to do with it?
    I have installed Exchange 2010 Service Pack 2 on this server since the recovery though.
    I am running out of ideas so any help would be greatly appreciated.

    skippy-85,
    Any updates on this Issues?
    In case if the issue stands
    resolved, Please mark Solution for this Thread and close this.
    In case if you still have
    the issue with the RU4 installation do let us know!
    Thanks
    Exchangeexperts.in ~ ( Exchange | 2003/2007/2010/E15(2013)) ~Mark this if Helpful~ This Information is provided "AS IS" and confers no Rights!!

  • Exchange 2010 SP2 : Log Sequence Missing...

    Hi Friends,
    Recently we configure EMC Networker backup in our environment. but somehow it's not running incremental backup. when we send logs to EMC they reply some log sequence is missing. how i can fix this issue. can anyone help me.
    I am using Exchange 2010 SP2
    DAG Environment
    Two Hubcas Server with two seprate Mailbox servers (Active and Passive)
    Few logs are below...
    18/05/2014 16:01:40  
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save NMM .. Possible loss of log data. For database DB-2GB-1, the current log file on disk is E01000D779E.log -- 882590. Previous log file backed up was E01000D6B22.log -- 879394.
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save NMM .. Log file gap detected from previous backup to current for APPLICATIONS:\Microsoft Exchange 2010. Promoting this saveset to FULL.  
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save Save set name APPLICATIONS:\Microsoft Exchange 2010 is valid.
    19/05/2014 16:01:18  
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save NMM .. Possible loss of log data. For database DB-2GB-1, the current log file on disk is E01000D8741.log -- 886593. Previous log file backed up was E01000D78AD.log -- 882861.
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save NMM .. Log file gap detected from previous backup to current for APPLICATIONS:\Microsoft Exchange 2010. Promoting this saveset to FULL.  
    Mailbox.domain.local nsrsnap_vss_save Save set name APPLICATIONS:\Microsoft Exchange 2010 is valid.

    Hi,
    Please make sure the Microsoft Exchange Server Extension for Windows Server Backup service running fine.
    Please also try to collect some App log for the further troubleshooting.
    Thanks
    Mavis
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I create a new database?

    Hi, can anyone tell me the steps I have to do if I want to create a new database? Can I perform this operation from the console of the Enterprise Manager or from the DBA studio? Thank you.

  • Can't create a new query with an error msg

    We used to create a query called, eg, Q, then we copied it to Q_1 and deleted Q, but somehow when we try to rename the copied query Q_1 back to Q by creating a new query called Q, get error msg saying that 'Query name Q exists already'.  When we try

  • Resetting NVRAM

    hi, I've been trying to reset my NVRAM, but I'm not sure how to do it, I've tried looking on the apple site but it's not that helpful. It says to go into the Open Firmware and type "reset-nvr" but I can't even get into the Open Firmware prompt and I

  • Who can tell me how to make up two oracle as mirror pair

    who can do me favor to tell me where to start? appreciate at first. Frederick van Targero

  • Field Exit or User Exit for Maintenance Order field.

    Dear All, we need an field exit or an user exit for order(AUFNR)field in PM module. The Client wants that the value of this field should be validated and for certaion condition an error message should be given while saving an invoice for this order.