Exchange 2010 SP3 and UR6 Query - Order of Install

hi,
I need to update my Exchange 2010 SP2 Servers to SP3 and Update Rollup 6.
Can someone confirm the update order for me?
I have 5 servers;
Live Data Centre:
2 x HUB / CAB (Using Windows NLB)
2 x Mailbox (DAG)
Disaster Recovery:
1 x Multi-Role Server (CAS / HUB and Mailbox) - this is also Part of the DAG
Two Questions:
1.) What is the Order in which I install SP3 on these Servers? Should it be Live Data Centre: HUB / CAS, Mailbox Servers and THEN the Multi-Role Server at DR?
2.) When Upgrading each server, should I do SP3, reboot, check and THEN install Update Rollup 6 - or should I upgrade all Servers to SP3 and then start the process again to get to Update Rollup 6?
Thanks in advance for your help with this query.
Regards,
Adam

1) Internet facing CAS first in each AD site. Order: CAS> HUB> UM> MBX
2) Personally, I would install SP3, reboot, then install SP6, but its really up to you.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb629560(v=exchg.141).aspx
Upgrade Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010 SP1, Exchange 2010 SP2, or Exchange 2010 SP3
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Similar Messages

Calendar Sharing between 2 organisation Exchange 2010 SP3 and Exchange online with Federation Trust.

Hi...
Our company is running Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Standart would like to have Shared calendar with organisation running with Exchange online.
We made a Federation trust between organisations and I checked that one certificate was installed and the rule for their domain was created. but when I try to share my calendar I always receive.
"Calendar sharing is not available with the following contacts because of permission settings on your network."
Name I took from GAL or input manually and always same. Forgot to mention that we migrated from Exchange 2003 to 2010 SP3 and all old exchange servers I removed. I tried everything that I know and read and nothing helped.
Hope for your support.
Thank you.

1)I deleted everything and made step by step as indicated in your articles.
2) recreated organisation relationship:
RunspaceId : xxxxxxxxxx
DomainNames : {xxxxxxx.microsoftonline.com, xxxxxxxxx.onmicrosoft.com, xxxxxxx.com}
FreeBusyAccessEnabled : True
FreeBusyAccessLevel : LimitedDetails
FreeBusyAccessScope :
MailboxMoveEnabled : False
DeliveryReportEnabled : False
MailTipsAccessEnabled : False
MailTipsAccessLevel : None
MailTipsAccessScope :
TargetApplicationUri : outlook.com
TargetSharingEpr :
TargetOwaURL :
TargetAutodiscoverEpr : https://pod12312.outlook.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc/WSSecurity
OrganizationContact :
Enabled : True
ArchiveAccessEnabled : False
AdminDisplayName :
ExchangeVersion : 0.10 (14.0.100.0)
Name : xxx
DistinguishedName : CN=xxx,CN=Federation,CN=uxx,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=uxxx,DC=com
Identity : Lxx
Guid : a8xxx
ObjectCategory : upxxs.com/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Fed-Sharing-Relationship
ObjectClass : {top, msExchFedSharingRelationship}
WhenChanged : 27/01/2015 3:23:47 PM
WhenCreated : 26/01/2015 9:41:39 AM
WhenChangedUTC : 27/01/2015 8:23:47 PM
WhenCreatedUTC : 26/01/2015 2:41:39 PM
OrganizationId :
OriginatingServer : xxx.upxxxns.com
IsValid : True
3. Configured Sharing Policies:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-SharingPolicy
Name Domains Enabled Default
Default Sharing Policy {*:CalendarSharingFreeBusySimple} True False
Lxxx {lxxx.com:CalendarSharingFreeBusy... True True
added my mail box to sharing policy but in the end receive same error
Calendar sharing is not available with the following contacts because of permission settings on your network.
In EventViewer everything seems to be fine....
No errors on policy creation... How can be checked this permission
settings on your network they are on exchange on in DC ?

Exchange 2010 SP3 and meeting forward notification options

I'm having an issue with meeting forward notifications in Exchange 2010 SP3. I'm working on an integration project with an existing system using the EWS Managed API. Part of this system is handling forward notifications and responses. However, we've hit
an issue regarding the way forwards are generated by Exchange.
In short, when a meeting request is forwarded to an external address (could be an Exchange server outside of our domain, gmail, or anything, really), the notification they receive places the meeting owner in the "sent representing" field, not the
person who actually sent the forward. As a result, any responses from the forward recipient will go directly back to the organizer, and the user who forwarded the request may not even be visible. We do not want this to happen. We'd prefer that the forward
show the person who actually sent it as the sender, and as a result, the response should go directly back to them, not the organizer.
Is this possible, either through settings or flags on the Appointment object itself or through some additional configuration options in Exchange? Installing a third-party transport agent (even one that we write) is probably out of the question.

What if you "Forward as iCalendar"
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on www.exchangequery.com

Exchange 2010 sp3 and WSUS

I have a DAG environment with Exchange 2010. last week I moved from sp2 RU6 to sp3 rtm. I then manually installed RU6 for sp3. the correct verison numbers are being displayed in the EMC under Help>About Exchange Server 2010 (it shows version 14.03.0195.001) I
verified the version numbers on this site -
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/240.exchange-server-and-update-rollups-build-numbers.aspx
My question is, in WSUS, it shows that all my servers with exchange on them, (a management server with the EMC only, 2 exchange servers for the DB, a CAS server and a DR exchange server) need SP3 RU2.
1) Will this disrupt the current SP3 RU6 installation?
2) Would it be better to just decline the SP3 RU2 update in WSUS?
3)Should I just proceed with the installation and see what happens?
If I am on the wrong forum, please let me know.
thanks
Ian
Ian

Hi
I prefer doing rollups by downloading the file and installing it on the server from an elevated prompt.
Deploying it with WSUS always leaves room for error.
Rather manually download the file and plan the installation.
Hope this helps. Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

After Exchange 2010 SP3 and rollup 4 update conditional formatting causes messages not to appear in Outlook 2010

Hi,
after updating to exchange 2010 sp 3 from sp 2 and also updating to rollup 4, users who use conditional formatting cannot see new message unless they close and reopen Outlook.
If you decide to change the font colour for unread messages, the messages do not appear in Outlook but a pop up indicates that a new message has arrived.
If you reopen Outlook, the unread messasge appears.
remove the conditional formatting and no issue with viewing unread messages as they arrive.
running Outook version 14.0.7106.5003
is this a known issue? a user who never used conditional formatting will experience this right away.
Thanks,
rudif

Hi rudif,
If the issue only happens to users who use conditional formatting and OWA can work well for all mailbox, I think the issue should be in client side.
Please try to reset View then set the conditional formatting back to have a try. If the issue continues, please try to recreate the Outlook profile to check whether the issue persists. Also try restarting Outlook in Safe mode by running
Outlook /safe switch.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

After Exchange 2010 SP3 upgrade, UAG publised OWA is throwing a "You do not have permissions to view this folder or page" error

Hi,
We have an issue with our OWA page. We are currently publishing OWA via UAG.
We recently upgraded to Exchange 2010 SP3 and then SP3 Rollup7. Since the upgrade, we are keep getting the following error after entering our credentials on the login page. I've tried with every possible browser.
You do not have permissions to view this folder or page
Strangely enough, the mobile phones are sending and receiving emails just fine, the phones use the same OWA link, so it's not an authentication issue, the phones login into the UAG servers with no issues. I can see this on the Active Sessions screen
on Web Monitor.
I've attempted to connect to the OWA by bypassing the UAG server, so putting in the local OWA address of one of my Exchange servers, it works... so the OWA page is up and running.
No error logs get generated on Web Monitor when we receive the permission error, I think this is because it's past authentication, it's on the Exchange layer.
Any insight would be helpful? I'm assuming something changed on the Exchange side after the upgrade.
Just in case, I've upgraded the UAG and TMG servers to the latest SP and Rollup packets.
UAG > SP4
TMG > SP2 Rollup 5

I've found a solution; UAG requires Basic Authentication over OWA. For some reason Integrated Windows Authentication got turned on after the SP3 upgrade.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee921443.aspx
Turning Integrated Windows Authentication off via the Client Access OWA settings resolved the issue. Though beware, you
have do this on all your Client Access servers.

Exchange 2010 SP3 - "500 5.3.3 Unrecognized command" in SMTP Receive Log. Senders get message with the same problem

Hi
My exchange environment consist with "Server Exchange 2010 SP3" and "Edge Server with Exchange 2010 SP3".
On Edge server in SMTP receive log i get every now and then an entry: xxxxxx 500 5.3.3 Unrecognized command.
It is serius problem because I got few e-mails from senders that they had problem with sending e-mail messages to our e-mail domain. They receive e-mail report, for example
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain domena.plby
mail.domena.pl.
[95.xxx.xxx.xx].
The error that the other server returned was:
500 5.3.3 Unrecognized command
Could you help me to solve this problem? What could cause this problem?
Thank you in advance
Tomasz
Kind Regards Tomasz

I have the same issue, but there is plenty of hard disk storage on the Exchange Server. This seems to only be happening from Google Business account/ Postini. If I send message from my personal Gmail account it works fine, but an agency who is on Google
business seems to have issues sending to us and they are delayed, sometimes they get through and other times they just don't.
Results from Mail Acceptance Test:
I enter my internal address and the remote users postini account as the test setup I received two emails from the tool but the end results of the test are:
Error submitting mail
Mail submission failed: Error message: Syntax error, command unrecognized. The server response was: 5.3.3 Unrecognized command.
Google support stated this:
Here are the logs from Postini trying to connect to mydomain.com (IP x.x.x.x) :
1. 2014/08/09 03:26:28 IP:209.85.218.50 SMTP-STLS:OK <null> TLSv1:RC4-SHA Validate:None 2. 2014/08/09 03:26:28 IP:209.85.218.50 SMTP LOG: Sender => FFD:MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>
3. 2014/08/09 03:26:28 IP:209.85.218.50 Fdal:Customer has null root_iid outbound default at org 100000001 4, 2014/08/09 03:26:28 IP:209.85.218.50 SMTP LOG: Sender <= FFD:250 Ok 5. 2014/08/09 03:26:28 IP:209.85.218.50 SMTP LOG: Sender => FFD:RCPT TO:[email protected]>
6. 2014/08/09 03:26:34 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP LOG: FFD => mydomain.com (x.x.x.x):Connection established 7. 2014/08/09 03:26:34 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP LOG: FFD <= mydomain.com (x.x.x.x):220 server.mydomain.com
ESMTP Service ready 8. 2014/08/09 03:26:34 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP LOG: Sender <= FFD:250 Ok 9. 2014/08/09 03:26:35 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP LOG: Sender => FFD:968 last bytes of data with dot 10. 2014/08/09 03:28:05
IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] From:[email protected]:1119780 FP:2603ec6d38c69886eb1000e516fb745a0384e50b SMTP:Delivery still in progress after 90 seconds, recording FP 11. 2014/08/09 03:31:17 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP
LOG: FFD => mydomain.com (x.x.x.x):failed to send the last period(.) 12. 2014/08/09 03:31:17 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] oremote:Skipping Archive for Sender because did not deliver message 13. 2014/08/09 03:31:17 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected]
SMTP:451 Remote connection lost - psmtp 14. 2014/08/09 03:31:17 IP:209.85.218.50 To:[email protected] SMTP LOG: Sender <= FFD:451 Remote connection lost - psmtp
As you can see, on line 9, at 03:26:35, we declared to the receiving server what we were about to send. At the line number 10, almost two minutes passed without an authorization (250 OK) from the receiving server. You can see our status being pushed back
at that moment to the receiving mail server: SMTP:Delivery still in progress after 90 seconds. Two more minutes later the connection was simply dropped and so we generated a 400 error message to encourage the sending server to try again later (since no bounce
was given per say from the receiving server, we won't hard-bounce it but defer it).
I hope this will help. you can try to look in the mydomain.com inbound logs and see at that exact time what happened? Unfortunately, our visibility pretty much ends there as we don't have full visibility of your mail environment. You'll need to investigate
within your own environment unfortunately. If you have any more information to share with me, in case it might help me help you, feel free to do so. I'll leave this case opened for now.
Sincerely,
Patricia
Google Enterprise Support

Support Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange 2010 SP3

Hi
I have a simple question: Is there a full support of FPE 2010 (Version 11.0.727.0) for Exchange 2010 SP3 (and Rollup Updates)?
Thomas

Hi,
It seems that FPE 2010 for exchange 2010 SP3 is supported and you need to install the Rollup 4. For more detailed information, please refer to the link below:
Hotfix Rollup 4 for Microsoft Forefront Protection for Exchange
Updates for Microsoft Forefront and Related Technologies
Hope this helps!
Susie

Coexistence & Upgrade Exchange 2010 SP3 Unified Messaging to Exchange 2013 SP1 UM

Hello Experts,
We're doing Exchange 2010 SP3 to Exchange 2013 SP1 upgrade.
This upgrade also include Unified Messaging component which is currently working with Exchange 2010 SP3 and Lync 2013.
We have one dial plan and its SIP URI and Secured.
Looking for high level steps to plan coexistence and upgrade of Unified Messaging from Exchange 2010 SP3 to Exchange 2013 SP1 integrated with Lync 2013. I'll also appreciate tips on what kind of certificate and its Subject name(s).
Microsoft documentation is not very clear and I found it confusing for my scenario. Since I we don't want any downtime for UM users, looking for some help.
Thanks in advance for help.
-DK

Hello Hinte,
Thanks for the information. I have been to this article which explains fresh deployment but doesn't address coexistence and migration scenario.
I'm looking for high level steps only. Can anyone validate and suggest if I'm missing something!
1) Install new CAS+MBX Server
2) Move system mailbox as per MS documentation to Exchange 2013 MBX
3) On CAS+MBX Server Enabled internal CA trusted Cert for UM Services.Internal
CA certs contain only CAS+MBX server's FQDN only.UM services Startup Mode is set to "Dual".
4) Assigned existing SIP URI Based Exchange 2010 Dial plan to New Exchange 2013 Servers.
5) Run Exchucutil.ps1
in Exchange 2013 and OcsUMUtil in Lync 2013 (Again?)
Will this be enough or Do I need to create New Auto attendant or
Haunt Group etc?
Thanks for all the help!

Exchange 2010 SP3 Prerequisites

Trying to run Exchange 2010 SP3 and the prerequisite check indicates I need the following:
Error:
Install hotfix Microsoft Knowledge Base article 982867 from http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/KB982867.
Click here for help... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.3.123.3&e=ms.exch.err.Ex28883C&l=0&cl=cp
As far as I can tell that Hotifx is no longer offered. How do I get this hotfix so I can install Exchange 2010 SP3?

Is it Windows 2008 R2 SP1 with .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1? Install this...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2637518/en-us
Blog |
Get Your Exchange Powershell Tip of the Day from here

SME 7.1 not working with Exchange 2010 SP3 UR8v2 and OnTap 8.2.3 7mode

Followed IMT and installed software that NetApp said would work.Ontap 8.2.3 7-modevmWare 5.0 SP3Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1Exchange 2010 SP3 UR8v2NetApp Host Tools 6.0.2SnapDrive 7.1.1SME 7.1 Everything connects fine. SnapDrive sees my drives. SME connects to Exchange Server. However in the process of configuring SME, I get the following error. I have followed knowledge base article and increased the timeout of DFM connection in registry, but that has not solved the problem. Has anyone run into this before? SME 6.1 works fine, but is not compatible with SnapDrive 7.1.1 (causes verifications to fail because server can't mount clone) and lower SnapDrive versions are not compatible with Ontap 8.2.3. I am in a real bind here. Thanks in advance.

the following configuration for SME 7.1 is no longer supported: Windows Server 2008 R2Exchange 2010 SP3 RU1 – RU5WMF/PowerShell 3.0SME 7.1 The supported configuration will now be: Windows Server 2008 R2Exchange 2010 SP3 RU5WMF/PowerShell 4.0SME 7.1 this is because Microsoft does not support WMF 3.0 on Server 2008 R2 running Exchange 2010 SP3, with any RU version.SME 7.1 requires a minimum of PowerShell 3.0 (part of WMF 3.0) in order to run. Feel free to review the Exchange Server Supportability Matrix located here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff728623%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx. All existing documentation (ISG, Admin Guide, IMT) will be updated shortly to reflect this change in requirements. hope that helps,Domenico.

List of all historical meetings and attendants - resource mailbox exchange 2010 sp3

Hi,
I'm an exchange admin, and i'm looking for a PS script of some sort to get a list of all the meetings held in a resource mailbox and its attendants.
ie: meeting room 1 -> get a list of all the meetings held there and the attendants for a period of 3 months.
Is there anybody who has experience with this ?
(Exchange 2010 sp3)u

Hi,
I recommend that you post this in Script Forum,there are more Powershell experts to help you:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/scriptcenter/en-US/home?category=scripting
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup 8 and Rollup 7

Hi
I have a customer with a Small Business Server 2010 with Exchange 2010 SP3.
The Customer installed updates on the server 10/12/2014 where Rollup 8 for Exchange was included.
After that the Customer has a lot of problems with connection from Outlook to Exchange and they phoned us.
We have looked on the problem and found a Microsoft article about rollup 8 where they said DO NOT INSTALL
We ran Windows Update again on the 13/12/2014 where Rollup 7 was installed
The customers still has problems with connection from Outlook.
One of the errors:
From: Systemadministrator
Sent: 15. december 2014 10:54
Subject: Unable to be delivered: Test
This message did not reach one or all of the recipients.
      Subject:     Test
      Sent:15-12-2014 10:54
Unable to deliver to the following recipient(s):
      MST the 15-12-2014 10:54
            This message could not be sent. Try to send the message again later, or contact the networkadministrator. Error [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].
Another error in Application log:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchange Common
Date:          16-12-2014 08:09:00
Event ID:      4999
Task Category: General
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      <servername>.<domain>.local
Description:
Watson report about to be sent for process id: 9340, with parameters: E12, c-RTL-AMD64, 14.03.0224.001, M.E.RpcClientAccess.Service, M.E.RpcClientAccess.Handler, M.E.R.H.ViewCache.IsRowWithinUnreadCache, System.IndexOutOfRangeException, 8e38, 14.03.0224.001.
ErrorReportingEnabled: False
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="MSExchange Common" />
    <EventID Qualifiers="16388">4999</EventID>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>1</Task>
    <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-12-16T07:09:00.000000000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>174679</EventRecordID>
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer><servername>.<domain>.local</Computer>
    <Security />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data>9340</Data>
    <Data>E12</Data>
    <Data>c-RTL-AMD64</Data>
    <Data>14.03.0224.001</Data>
    <Data>M.E.RpcClientAccess.Service</Data>
    <Data>M.E.RpcClientAccess.Handler</Data>
    <Data>M.E.R.H.ViewCache.IsRowWithinUnreadCache</Data>
    <Data>System.IndexOutOfRangeException</Data>
    <Data>8e38</Data>
    <Data>14.03.0224.001</Data>
    <Data>False</Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
What to do ?
Best Regards
John B

Hi John,
Please type
outlook /safe in RUN to start Outlook in safe mode and then check if this issue still exists. Meanwhile, please run Exchange Best Practices Analyzer and check if find relevant issues.
à
This message could not be sent. Try to send the message again later, or contact the networkadministrator.
Error [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].
The issue typically occurs if send messages to a large number of recipients.
When this issue occurred, did you check if send message successfully via OWA?
à
We have looked on the problem and found a Microsoft article about rollup 8 where they said DO NOT INSTALL
Did you mean this article:
Exchange releases: December 2014?
à
We ran Windows Update again on the 13/12/2014 where Rollup 7 was installed
From the Event ID 4999, I noticed that point to
14.03.0224.001, it should mean the old Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8. From above
mentioned article (Exchange releases: December 2014),
Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8 has been re-released to the Microsoft download center resolving a regression discovered in the initial release. The update RU8 package
corrects the issue which impacted users connecting to Exchange from Outlook. The updated RU8 package is version number 14.03.0224.002. Just a confirmation, did you
reinstall that re-released Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8? Any difference?
If any update, please feel free to let me know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Outlook 2010 and Exchange 2010 SP3

Hello,
we are planning to upgrade from Exchange 2010 sp1 to SP3, most of client PCs has Windows XP sp3 and Oultook 2010 with VSTO addins working with mapi properties.
I need to know if there are any known issues between this client environment and Exchange 2010 SP3 ??
thanks a lot,
Mauricio.
Mauricio

Windows XP is not supported in any scenario, so yes, I'd call that a known issue.
Mike Crowley | MVP
My Blog --
Planet Technologies

Opportunistic TLS between our Exchange 2010 SP3 on Premise (WIth Edge) and Exchange Online Protection.

Hi,
We would like to configure Opportunistic TLS between our Exchange 2010 SP3 On Premise Systems (with Edge) and EOP.
I can see that Opportunist TLS is enabled on both the send and receive connectors in EOP. SO I think no change required here.
The On premise Send Connector (Configured by EdgeSync) does not have the option for Opportunistic TLS. Under "Configure Smart Host Authentication Settings" it is currently set to "None". I have the option for "Basic Authentication
over TLS" but this requires a Username and Password. No option for Opportunistic TLS. When I look at the properties of the send connector (get-sendconnector "sendconnector_name" | fl) I
can see that the IgnoreSTARTTLS parameter is set to FALSE - so I think that means it is enabled. So I think no changes required here- right?
The receive connector on the Edge Server has the TLS option on the Authentication tab - so I guess I just check that option right?
The Edge servers also run TMG and the two are integrated. I don't think this changes anything but thought I would include it in case it does.
Anything I have missed?
Thanks very much.
Geoff
ilmuro69

Hi,
We would like to configure Opportunistic TLS between our Exchange 2010 SP3 On Premise Systems (with Edge) and EOP.
I can see that Opportunist TLS is enabled on both the send and receive connectors in EOP. SO I think no change required here.
The On premise Send Connector (Configured by EdgeSync) does not have the option for Opportunistic TLS. Under "Configure Smart Host Authentication Settings" it is currently set to "None". I have the option for "Basic Authentication
over TLS" but this requires a Username and Password. No option for Opportunistic TLS. When I look at the properties of the send connector (get-sendconnector "sendconnector_name" | fl) I
can see that the IgnoreSTARTTLS parameter is set to FALSE - so I think that means it is enabled. So I think no changes required here- right?
The receive connector on the Edge Server has the TLS option on the Authentication tab - so I guess I just check that option right?
The Edge servers also run TMG and the two are integrated. I don't think this changes anything but thought I would include it in case it does.
Anything I have missed?
Thanks very much.
Geoff
ilmuro69

Exchange 2010 SP3 and UR6 Query - Order of Install

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for