Exchange 2010 Store.exe Memory Usage

I have read about msExchESParamCacheSizeMax and it seems to do nothing with my server. 
I am running Server 2008 R2 x64. With Exchange 2010 x64 with 1 Mailbox Store and 10 Mailboxes.  The store.exe process sucks up anywhere from 11-13GB of Ram on my 32GB server.  
What is the true way to limit the store.exe process or the database?

Hi Miller,
I agree with Amit.
We usually receive questions that Exchange service (store.exe) is using most of the memory on a mailbox server.
If another process should need the more memory, the Exchange store.exe process will released it as required. This is by design.
More details to see following blog:
Exchange 2010 store.exe service takes high memory utilization.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/maliks/archive/2012/04/25/exchange-2010-store-exe-service-takes-high-memory-utilization.aspx
I also find a similar thread for your reference:
Exchange 2010 and Store.exe
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/b18cbeb5-8ec7-4669-b25e-c7ea95992b9a/exchange-2010-and-storeexe
Thanks
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2010 Store.exe constantly crashing, Faulting Module: MSVCR90.DLL

    I'm running Exchange 2010, with SP1.  The Information store will not stay running, and repeatedly restarts, not allowing access to Outlook for users.
    This error is repeated over and over in the application log.
    Faulting application name: store.exe, version: 14.1.421.2, time stamp: 0x505238e9
    Faulting module name: MSVCR90.dll, version: 9.0.30729.4959, time stamp: 0x4b5fcb8e
    Exception code: 0xc0000005
    Fault offset: 0x000000000001e113
    Faulting process id: 0x2868
    Faulting application start time: 0x01cdc29cc9606f11
    Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\bin\store.exe
    Faulting module path: C:\Windows\WinSxS\amd64_microsoft.vc90.crt_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.30729.4959_none_08e45ce1a83d7e3c\MSVCR90.dll
    Report Id: bc7f3d19-2e90-11e2-81f8-9c8e992ff057

    It's not really great resurrecting threads like this.  The OP has SP1, you listed SP3.  There is a *LOT* of water under the change bridge in between these builds............
    And you'll need to provide some details on this - it's a touch vague to say the least :(
    But do that in a fresh thread please.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Limiting Memory Usage of Exchange 2010sp1 store.exe on a Windows 2012r2 Server?

    Hello,
    I am running Windows 2012r2 Server with Exchange 2010sp1, 1 forest and 6 mailboxes. So this is not a heavy load for Exchange 2010sp1 to handle. The problem is the Windows 2012r2 server is also used as a file storage server. The problem is the Exchange 2010sp1
    is using most of the 16GB of ram available and slowing down the server. Is it possible to limit the Exchange 2010sp1 store.exe to use less memory and if so what are the steps in Windows 2012r2 to complete this task.
    I have read that it can be done through ADSI Edit. But the steps they explain are not for Windows 2012r2 and do not match.
    Thank You,
    Stan

    Hi Stan,
    Did you change msExchESEparamCacheSizeMax and msExchESEparamCacheSizeMin both attribute of Information Store?
    Start ADSIEDIT.msc Navigate to Configuration > Services > Microsoft Exchange > <Organization Name> > Administrative Groups > <Administrative Group> > Servers > <Server Name> > InformationStore
    http://eightwone.com/2011/04/06/limiting-exchange-2010-sp1-database-cache/
    That ADSIEdit path shouldn't be different on Windows 2012 R2 because it doesn't depend on operating system and it should be always same in Configuration partition of Active Directory. 
    Besides....
    Exchange 2010 SP1 (and SP2) is not supported now so suggest you upgrade to SP3. http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2013/01/04/end-of-exchange-2010-sp1-support.aspx
    Exchange 2010 (with any service pack or update rollups) is not (yet) supported to install on Windows 2012 R2 - http://technet.microsoft.com/library/ff728623(v=exchg.150).aspx

  • Extproc.exe memory usage

    Hello,
    I'm having problems while using ODT with ODAC (11.2.0.2.1). I've done a .NET (C# using Visual Studio 2010) library to be called from PL/SQL. It works without a problem, and finish the execution closing all objects and even doing a Garbage Collection (System.GC.Collect()) just to be sure that the most memory is reclaimed.
    The problem comes when I do the stress test (multiple call to the C# procedure, like 20000 times). I can see how extproc.exe (the service/process used to make external calls) start using more and more memory. Each call to the C# procedure wastes some KB of memory, and when I do the stress test, extproc.exe comes to have allocated 800 MB of RAM memory and even more...
    It seems that sometimes, Oracle or the process itself makes acknowledge of the RAM used and I see it wasting only 100 MB, so it seems it has some kind of memory management capabilities, but it's not enought, as sometimes memory goes as high that my server starts loading out some process from memory and performance degrades.
    Is there any way to control how much memory extproc.exe can waste, or control the behaviour of the process, or something like that?
    Thanks a lot,
    Luis Miguel

    AnubhavM wrote:
    I have tested for memory leak with JProfiler, it shows that the GC gets called after some time, and there is no increase in heap size. But the memory usage of Javaw.exe keeps increasing. Is it possible that JVM is not returning memory back to OS? or some other reason for increase in memory usage?The VM isn't returning memory to the OS and it's designed to work like that. (Or at least used to be, I saw a change request on that a couple of years ago and it got many votes in the bugdatabase)

  • CF8 jrun.exe memory usage

    Hello-
    Thanks in advance. I've installed an eval version of CF8 on
    my (future) production server running Windows 2003 Server Standard.
    I've noticed jrun.exe is using about 160+MB of RAM. That seems high
    to me, so I installed it on my development machine and noticed it's
    using the same amount. Is this normal? It seems high considering
    CF7 was using about 55MB. I've scoured the forums (and Google) to
    see if there's any info on this, but no luck.
    Your input is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Peter

    I meant eight hundred megabytes to one gigabyte, of RAM, in
    use, times two instances per physical box. :)
    We're doing about 3.5 million page hits per day on one
    app/web server for a corporate intranet. So we run high in the
    memory usage department.

  • Exchange 2010 Mailbox Server Memory Requirement.

    Hi Team,
    We have 4 Mailbox server role with below configuration. CAS/HT is installed seperatly on different server. How do I calculate the RAM required for the system. System Configuration --
    HP Proliant BL460c /Dual Processor (Hexa Core) /95GB RAM.             
    No of users hosted on the server 6200, No of Active/Passive Database copies on server -- 8.  No of Mails Sent/Recived/Size on daily basis (Avg)  - 22422/6344/13075. Do we have any formula to calculate the RAM to be installed on the server.

    Hi
    http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/exchange-2010-sizing-cheat-sheet.html
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd346700(v=exchg.141).aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/11/09/3408737.aspx

  • Monitoringhost.exe - Memory Usage

    Hi guys, 
    we have Server 2012 R2 with SCOM 2012 R2 on Hyper-V 2012.  Today was installed next Windows Updates; 
    All work fine, but  I don't understand what is wrong with processes MonitoringHost.exe. 
    Now use many more memory before Windows Updates;
    Have maybe somebody the same experience? Can somebody please explain this case  and fix maybe? 
    Thanks! 
    Ninja 4 IT

    The hotfix might be corrupted, please re-download the hotfix and try again.
    Another possibility is that you have registry settings that do not allow for long filenames during an MSI file install. To check this:
    Open the Registry Editor
    Windows 8:    
    Open to or change to the Start menu screen
    Type: REGEDIT (this will show in the Search page)
    Press the Enter key on the keyboard
    Windows 7 and Windows Vista    
    From the taskbar, click on the Start button
    Directly above Start, type: REGEDIT
    Press the Enter key on the keyboard
    Click Yes in the User Account Control dialog if necessary
    Browse to: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem
        To do this, click the triangle or plus sign next to each item listed until you get to FileSystem
    Click on FileSystem to display its contents in the right pane of the Registry Editor
    If the value for either the NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation DWORD or the
    Win31FileSystem DWORD is not 0, right click the DWORD, choose
    Modify, and set the value to "0".
    Juke Chou
    TechNet Community Support

  • SBS2011 (Exchange 2010 SP2) - limiting cache size doesn't appear to work

    Hi All,
    Hoping for some clarification here, or extra input at least.  I know there are other posts about this topic such as
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbusinessserver/thread/5acb6e29-13b3-4e70-95d9-1a62fc9304ac but these have been
    incorrectly marked as answer in my opinion.
    To recap the issue.  The Exchange 2010 store.exe process uses a lot of memory.  So much in fact it has a negative performance impact on the server (sluggish access to the desktop etc).  You can argue about this all day - it's by design
    and shouldn't be messed with etc but the bottom line is that it does use too much memory and it does need tweaked.  I know this because if you simply restart the Information Store process (or reboot the server) it frees up the memory and the performance
    returns (until its cache is fully rebuilt that is).  I have verified this on 4 different fresh builds of SBS2011 over the last 6 months. (all on servers with 16GB RAM)
    I have scoured the internet for information on limiting how much memory exchange uses to cache the information store and most articles point back to the same two articles (http://eightwone.com/2011/04/06/limiting-exchange-2010-sp1-database-cache/
    and
    http://eightwone.com/2010/03/25/limiting-exchange-2010-database-cache) that deal with exchange 2010 and exchange 2010 SP1, notably not exchange 2010 SP2.  Ergo most articles are out of date since exchange 2010 SP2 has been released since these articles
    were posted.
    When testing with our own in house SBS2011 server (with exchange 2010 SP2) I have found that specifying the min, max and cache sizes in ADSIEDIT has varying results that are not in line with the results documented in the articles I mentioned above. 
    I suspect the behaviour of these settings has changed with the release of exchange 2010 SP2 (as it did between the initial release and SP1).
    Specifically here's what I have found using ADSIEDIT;
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSize to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax to a value - it doesn't have any effect.
    If you set the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin to a value - it always locks the store.exe process to using exactly this value.
    I have also tested using combinations of these settings with the result that the size and max size values are always ignored (and the store.exe process uses the maximum available amount of memory - thus causing the performance degradation) but as soon as
    you specify the min value it locks it to this value and it doesn't change.
    As a temporary solution on our in-house SBS2011 I have set the min value to 4GB and it appears to be running fine (only 15 mailboxes though).
    Anyone got some input on this ? thank you for your time.

    I concur with Erin. I'm seeing the same behaviour across all SBS2011 boxes, whether running SP1, SP2 or SP3.
    If a minimum value is set, the store cache size barely rises above the minumum. I have one server with 32GB RAM. Store.exe was using 20GB of RAM, plus all the other Exchange services which total 4GB+. That left virtually no free RAM and trying to do
    anything else on the server was sluggish at best.
    All the advise is that setting a maximum alone has no effect and a minimum must be set too. But when set, the store cache size barely rises above the minimum. I have set a 4GB minimum and 16GB max, but 5 days later it's still using only slightly more than
    4GB and there's 8GB free. Now the server as a whole is responsive, but doing anything with Exchange is sluggish.
    Just saying leave Exchange to manage itself is not an answer. The clue is in the name - Small Business Server. It's not Exchange Only Server - there are other tasks an SBS must handle so leaving Exchange to run rampant is not an option. Besides, there are
    allegedly means to manage the Exchange cache size - they just don't apparently work!
    I'm guessing nobody has an answer to this so the only solution is to effectively fix the cache size to a sensible value by setting min and max to the same value.
    Adam@Regis IT

  • Jrun.exe memory leak

    Hi,
    I had my brand new test server setup earlier this month with
    everything clean installed. I'm having issue with jrun.exe memory
    usage skyrocketing to 500mb+. jrun.exe also makes the sql queries
    to respond slow. What i've been doing for past week is terminate
    the process, and restart the server.
    Event after restarting, sometimes it instantly goes back to
    500mb+ usage. I'm testing farely small application on this server,
    i dont think the application would be causing this issue.
    I had the same problem before, thats why it lead me to get
    new test server, but now event on brand new system, jrun to repeat
    same issue.
    Beside coldfusion, i have sql server 2008, which runs
    perfectly normal throughout the week.
    Does anyone know the fix?
    Syed

    Jrun's jvm memory usage is configurable in the jvm.config
    file. It is most likely the default startup is defaulting to take
    up a minimum of 500 MB. Different jvm's act differently and some
    are better at memory management than others. This isn't necessarily
    an indication of a memory leak, it's more the jvm's nature to act
    in this manner. No matter what it's probably peaking around 1.5 GB
    if I had to guess.
    I would look for other areas when it comes to performance, if
    it's a small application and the only thing running on the CF
    server. Look for things like unintentional loops, returning large
    record sets from SQL, large values in session variables. Also never
    store client variables in the registry. It could also be if you
    have large db tables, you may need some indexing in the database.

  • Limit Memory usage on Exchange Store

    I am looking to limit the Exchange Store. Our Exchange server contains all roles and is being installed to replace a current Exchange 2003 server. Currently all mail now flows through the
    Ex2k10 server and 5 users have been moved to the new server. The server was installed roughly 45 days ago. The server has 16GB ram installed and runs Server 2012. Store.exe is taking 8GB and other services are beginning to have issues
    and I would like to limit the amount of memory it uses. Since there are currently 5 users on the system I was going to limit the store process to 6GB with a minimum of 4GB which would theoretically leave 2GB free according to current usage. The issue I have
    is the settings in ADSIEdit as outlined in several articles (example:
    http://eightwone.com/2011/04/06/limiting-exchange-2010-sp1-database-cache/#comment-9125) do not exist in my current config? We have Exchange 2010 SP3 installed and all of the latest patches at least to 45 days ago. If necessary I will increase
    the RAM in the future but IMHO the store should not currently need 8GB for 5 users

    Came across sites recently where the information store process on an SBS 2011 box tends to take most of the available memory. In normal circumstances Exchange 2010 is designed to use as much memory as possible for performance optimization. As long as Exchange
    2010 is running on it’s own, there’s no problem with that. The issues can arise in SBS 2011 environment, where there is SQL 2008 R2 installed alongside Exchange 2010 and SQL has similar optimization built in. As a result the performance of the system could
    degrade by time and requires restart  of Exchange/SQL services or rebooting the whole system.
    To avoid this problem, you can limit the amount of memory Exchange is using. Start by opening ADSIedit – either click Start -> ADSIedit.msc, or navigate to Start -> All Programs -> Administrative Tools -> ADSI Edit.
    Right click the root of the tree view on the left and select Connect To. . .  On the Connection Settings screen select the Select a well known Naming Context option and from the drop down list choose the Configuration option.
    Once connected to the Configuration Naming Context, navigate to the following item:
    Configuration -> Services -> Microsoft Exchange -> ”Organization Name” -> Administrative Groups > ”Administrative Group” -> Servers -> ”Server Name” -> InformationStore
    Right click Information Store and scroll down to msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax attribute and set the value according to your requirements.
    Please note that Exchange 2007 works with 8kB pages and Exchnage 2010 works with 32kB pages. So if you want to limit the size of memory used to 4GB, you will need the following calculations:
    Exchange 2007: 4 GB = 4.194.304 KB / 8 KB => 524288
    Exchange 2010: 4 GB = 4.194.304 KB / 32 KB => 131072
    If you have confirmed you have the correct numbers, you can click OK to save the settings and restart Microsoft Exchange Information Store service for the changes to take effect.
    UPDATE: As it turns out, setting the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax size only doesn’t seem to be sufficient. The limit has been actually applied only when the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin size was set as well. In our
    example the values would be set as follows:
    Exchange 2010:
    Min – 1GB: msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin = 32768
    Max – 4GB: msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax = 131072
    Exchange 2007:
    Min – 1GB: msExchESEParamCacheSizeMin = 131072
    Max – 4GB: msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax = 524288

  • Microsoft Exchange Information Store Service Utilizing High Memory

    Hi All,
    i have 2 Mailbox role server in DAG, the DB mounter server always utilizing high memory up to 98% by store.exe services. currently i am running with 24GB Physical Memory.
    when ever it goes to high memory i need to restart the store.exe services then, it will come back to normal 50% later slowly it will move to 86% like that. anyway where we can restrict or manage store.exe to utilize available memory.
    i am running with exchange 2010 SP1.
    srini

    Hi Andy,
    yes, its working as per normal, but i wanted to understand why all of sudden its utilizing all RAM and there is not available memory to perform anything else. due to this its always trigger alert notification based on my monitoring.
    Thanks.
    srini
    What is the server not able to do? What is affected?
    You can limit mem usage, but generally its not generally needed or recommended.
    However, if you have technical requirement to do that, you can:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/b7b2f9d9-4370-4984-8713-dc1d52a68105/how-to-reduce-memory-utilization-of-exchange-server-2010?forum=exchangesvradminlegacy
    http://www.bursky.net/index.php/2012/05/limit-exchange-2010-memory-use/
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • Exchange 2013 issue with High memory Usage on Mailbox server post SP1 update.

    So we have been chugging along fine since Feb 2 2014. 
    I performed a migration from 2010 from the UK to the US doing "incremental" mailbox moves. (get in contact with me if you want to know how. But we moved 400 Mailboxes averaging at 2gb a piece from the UK to the US, over the transcontinental link.
    & then the weekend of the final, had everyone & everything done by the end of the cutover weekend)
    Any woot.
    So I applied the 2013 SP1 a few weeks back, & have intermitantly been alerted to the memory spiking over 95%. For me (and for any exchange admin) when i get those types of alerts i drop everything & run to the nearest PC to see what is going on.
    Now the first & second time, it was an issue with logs filling up the drives, & my clean log script not running to remove any logs older than 30 days. But since then it has been legitimate 95%+ memory usage. 
    For the most part its been 95-97 max, with 1 or 2 times hitting 98. After some time, the memory does drop back down to 94.
    this is ....umm "fine" however it is becoming a nuisance, since most of the time it corrects itself. What i dont want to happen is get into the groove of saying "ah bah! its nothing" & letting it go.
    the server has 16gb of memory in it, it is the Mailbox server (CAS /Frontend is on a seperate server)
    below is a screen shot, so i know the Storeworker grabs whatever it feels like grabbing, however it does NOT EVER release memory.  I also see the NodeRunner.exe (2 of them)  is always around 900 almost a MB
    now if i could somehow get the first 2 Storeworkers to drop down to 900ish, then that should alleviate my memory issues. 
    what I am m looking for is some type of "magic bullet" to put my memory issues at ease..

    thats the problem & seems to be a misconception.
    Exchange NEVER releases the memory when other things need it.  As the users state in your thread you linked. (i came across that early in my search for a resolution). An example is if another admin & myself log into the backend server at the same
    time & begin clicking around opening things, etc..Memory will go to 100% which = No Buenos. 
    There are numerous post all over the internet from people who say it releases, but them 5 more comments to that 1 saying that it does not. 
    I know what the process's do, however it seems like the SP1 has increased memory usage, as typically the Store.exe would only grab about 900-1000. 
    in terms of the noderunner, once again i know its role, however we are now 2 months+ live on 2013 post migration, I do not think it is still indexing all those emails. 
    all DB's report healthy.
    Name                            Status  CopyQueue ReplayQueue LastInspectedLogTime   ContentIndex
      Length    Length                             State
    WBAC1\EXCHBE001                          Mounted         0         0                        
             Healthy
    WBAC2\EXCHBE001                          Mounted         0         0                        
             Healthy
    WBAC3\EXCHBE001                          Mounted         0         0                        
             Healthy
    WBAC4\EXCHBE001                          Mounted         0         0                        
             Healthy
    WBAC5\EXCHBE001                          Mounted         0         0                        
             Healthy

  • Exchange server 2010 mailbox role memory 100% - Virtual machine

    Dear All
    Please i need your help to accomplish this work.
    we are using two mailbox servers and two hab/cas servers and around 2000 users are using mailbox in my organization.
    Each mailbox server roles having 16GB RAM.
    all the exchange server running on virtaul machine. until last week we didn't experience any problem. since last week memory and cpu consuming 100% in one of mailbox server.
    i checked what are the process running while consuming 100% but couldn't  found any fishy process.
    Parthiban selvaraj

    Hi parthibanselvaraj,
    The behavior you see on the mailbox servers for store.exe is completely normal. This is in order to allocate as much data in memory address space as possible, so that each user experience great performance in their Outlook clients.
    If another process should need the more memory, the Exchange store.exe process will released it as required. This is by design.
    By default, the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax key is not set, which means the store can allocate the memory it needs dynamically. ESE (store.exe) will grow the cache to consume almost all available RAM on the server if there is no other memory pressure on the
    system For example, if the server contains 16gb physical memory, if there is no other memory pressure, one could expect that the store.exe process will grow to use up to 14gb memory (16gb minus 2gb allocated to Kernel mode). This much larger database cache
    size results in greatly reduced disk I/O, and is preferred anyways, as reading information from memory is much faster than reading information from disk. If memory pressure occurs, as when other applications request/require memory, ESE will appropriately shrink
    the size of the database cache. It’s not recommended to modify the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax attribute of the information store object. Lowering this value may degrade performance, in terms of server performance as well as in terms of end-user experience.
    Hope it can be helpful.
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe 100% CPU Usage

    Hi,
    We have an exchange server 2010 and the Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe used 100% CPU Usage suddenly. However, after rebooting the server, the CPU Usage of the above .exe is back to normal. Client cannot connect to the exchange server during
    the high CPU Usage of the above .exe.
    Any ideas for the above problems? Thank You.

    Hi
       Microsoft.Exchange.AddressBook.Service.exe is related to OAB function.
       Maybe mobile or client fails to download will cause this problem.
    What was the fix for this?

  • Memory leaks- high memory usage svchost.exe

    hello!
    im having a kind of a similar problem. Im using a Q6600 with 4Gb of RAM running on Windows 7 x64. My physical memory usage history is 1.75GB idle but my CPU usage looks good ~ 0%.
    In Windows Task Manager when i arranged the memory column, the process with the highest memory usge is svchost.exe with 116,572K. And i have 14 svchost.exe in my computer! I opened process exporer and check the legitimate of all those svchost.exe
    and they are all legit. When i look at the properties of the highest svchost.exe in process explorer, the services which is running under it is as follows
    AudioEndPointBuilder c:\Windows\System32\Audiosrv.dll
    CscService c:\Windows\System32\cscsvc.dll
    hidserv c:\Windows\System32\hidserv.dll
    Netman c:\Windows\System32\netman.dll
    PcaSvc c:\Windows\System32\pcasvc.dll
    SysMain c:\Windows\System32\sysmail.dll
    TrkWks c:\Windows\System32\trkwks.dll
    UxSms c:\Windows\System32\uxsms.dll
    wudfsvc c:\Windows\System32\WUDFSvc.dll
    All are legit DLLS.
    Is it normal to have 14 svchost.exe running at the same time(system, local service, network service in Task Manager)
    and how can i reduce the memory usage of the svchost.exe?

    Hi,
    There can be multiple instances of Svchost.exe running at the same time. Each Svchost.exe session can contain a grouping of services, so that separate services can
    be run depending on how and where Svchost.exe is started.
    If you would like to reduce the usage of this service, I could share the following article with you:
    Getting Started with SVCHOST.EXE Troubleshooting
    PRF: High CPU (SVCHOST.EXE)
    Hope it helps.
    Alex Zhao
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Maybe you are looking for