Exchange 2010 , Windows 2008 R2 and framework 3.5 SP1

Hi all ,
I have questation about protection exchange server 2010 with framework 3.51 SP1 running in the windows 2008r2 serveru . The DPM server is instaled in the windows 2012r2 server and supported version in this os is 2012R2 RU5 . After install i upgrade client
in the exchange serveru . and i the DPM console is status OK ? It is Ok ??? Or which client is running without fw 4.0 ? In another server I try run c:\Program Files\Microsoft System Center 2012\DPMAgentInstaller_KB3021791_AMD64 and this installer do not require
fw 4,0 .....
thanx
Falcon

Hi,
DPM 2012 R2 requires at least .NET Framework 4.0 and .NET Framework 4.0 works with Exchange 2010 SP3.
For more detailed information, please refer to the articles below:
Setup prerequisites
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh758058.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Exchange Server Supportability Matrix
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff728623(v=exchg.150).aspx
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Similar Messages

SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

Hi
Trying to obtain information on compatability of SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2 ?
I understand that SAP may not support this? But would it actually work? Assuming we have a third party supporting it?
Jay

Hi Jay,
You may check the support in PAM http://service.sap.com/pam.
Ideally SAP shall not support this environment.
Reason being:
1) SAP kernel for R3 4.5b not available for windows 2008 R2
2) Compatible database library not available for R3 4.5b on MSSQL 2008 R2.
with above 2 reason you shall not be able to install R3 4.5b on Windows 2008R2 with MSSQL 2008 R2 database.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

BPC 7.5 SP4 Support for Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

The release notes for BPC 7.5M SP04 state that support has been added for both Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2.
For SQL 2008 R2, there is nothing in the feature pack described as "SQL 2005 Backward Compatibility Components" - which was a required piece for BPC 7/7.5 on SQL 2008. Is the SQL 2008 version still a requirement, or does BPC 7.5 now not need the Backward Compatibility components?
Also, the ReprotViewer executable that is packaged with BPC 7.5 is the one for SQL 2008- will that work when installing SQL 2008 R2?
thanks,
Tony DeStefanis
Column5 Consulting

Hi,
we have the same environment (BPC 7.5 SP4 on Windows 2008 R2 64 bit and SQL Server 2008 R2 64bit).
we are developping our application-set and for the moment we have no problem.
regards
massimo

Exchange 2010 server (Mail,HUB and CAS) installation in new site.

We are planned to install Exchange 2010 servers(MAIL,HUB and CAS) server in new Active director site in existing exchange organization.
Kindly share best practice link for exchange server installation in new site.

The best practice for installing into a new Active Directory site is the same as installing into a new organization, except you don't need to prepare the organization or domains (unless you are also installing into a new domain that hasn't been prepared).
Install the CAS then hub, then mailbox roles, or install a multi-role server, then define your CAS Array name and IP address, and set your CAS behind a load balancer (if needed). Add your external certificate to both the CAS and the load balancer (and the
hub if you use TLS for mail transfer), and you should be golden. Also, if you intend to proxy your CAS connections, here's a link that may help:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310763.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
For completeness, here's a thread on the msexchange.org forums that specifically mentions adding Exchange into a second site:
http://forums.msexchange.org/New_Exchange_2010_at_another_Site/m_1800557445/tm.htm

The Exchange organization does not support this version of exchange - EXCHANGE 2010 on 2008 R2

Hi,
I am currently trying to install 2010 exchange on 2008 R2 after an unsuccessful run with 2013 install.
I am getting this error with the readiness checks.
I have uninstalled 2013 exchange and removed the folders in /Program Files but it seems that it is still picking up the 2013 install.
Is there something in AD that i need to delete so it forgets about 2013?

Hi nikala,
Thank you for your question.
I agree with Hinte. So if we want to install Exchange 2010 on present organization, we could recover the AD to time which is before to prepare AD schema for Exchange 2013.
I suggest we post error information when we install Exchange 2013 to
[email protected] for our troubleshooting.
In addition, there are a link for us to deploy Exchange 2013 on Window server 2008R2:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998636%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Jim Xu
TechNet Community Support

Error vss writers exchange 2010 windows backup

I have this error, when running windows backup on server with exchange 2010:
Writer name: 'Microsoft Exchange Writer'
   Writer Id: {76fe1ac4-15f7-4bcd-987e-8e1acb462fb7}
   Writer Instance Id: {400de426-a419-459f-a953-91026051bf91}
   State: [8] Failed
   Last error: Retryable error
I've rebooted the server several times, but without success.
Does anyone have any idea?
Thank you
Cristiano Ianiri

Hi,
Do you have any running AV software? If there is, please set the AV Exclusion on database file or disable AV temporarily.
From the description, you have restarted server several times. It didn't work. To narrow down the issue, could you please restart the Microsoft Exchange Information Store service again on the server where you did backup at your convenience?
After that, please run the VSSadmin list writers command to determine whether the writer state returns to a stable state.
Besides, please check the database that you want to backup to see if it is in healthy state. You can use the get-mailboxdatabasecopystatus cmdlet to check this.
If you have checked steps above, please increase the diagnostic logging level for the Exchange Writer and check if there is any clues.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup 8 and Rollup 7

Hi
I have a customer with a Small Business Server 2010 with Exchange 2010 SP3.
The Customer installed updates on the server 10/12/2014 where Rollup 8 for Exchange was included.
After that the Customer has a lot of problems with connection from Outlook to Exchange and they phoned us.
We have looked on the problem and found a Microsoft article about rollup 8 where they said DO NOT INSTALL
We ran Windows Update again on the 13/12/2014 where Rollup 7 was installed
The customers still has problems with connection from Outlook.
One of the errors:
From: Systemadministrator
Sent: 15. december 2014 10:54
Subject: Unable to be delivered: Test
This message did not reach one or all of the recipients.
      Subject:     Test
      Sent:15-12-2014 10:54
Unable to deliver to the following recipient(s):
      MST the 15-12-2014 10:54
            This message could not be sent. Try to send the message again later, or contact the networkadministrator. Error [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].
Another error in Application log:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchange Common
Date:          16-12-2014 08:09:00
Event ID:      4999
Task Category: General
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      <servername>.<domain>.local
Description:
Watson report about to be sent for process id: 9340, with parameters: E12, c-RTL-AMD64, 14.03.0224.001, M.E.RpcClientAccess.Service, M.E.RpcClientAccess.Handler, M.E.R.H.ViewCache.IsRowWithinUnreadCache, System.IndexOutOfRangeException, 8e38, 14.03.0224.001.
ErrorReportingEnabled: False
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
    <Provider Name="MSExchange Common" />
    <EventID Qualifiers="16388">4999</EventID>
    <Level>2</Level>
    <Task>1</Task>
    <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
    <TimeCreated SystemTime="2014-12-16T07:09:00.000000000Z" />
    <EventRecordID>174679</EventRecordID>
    <Channel>Application</Channel>
    <Computer><servername>.<domain>.local</Computer>
    <Security />
</System>
<EventData>
    <Data>9340</Data>
    <Data>E12</Data>
    <Data>c-RTL-AMD64</Data>
    <Data>14.03.0224.001</Data>
    <Data>M.E.RpcClientAccess.Service</Data>
    <Data>M.E.RpcClientAccess.Handler</Data>
    <Data>M.E.R.H.ViewCache.IsRowWithinUnreadCache</Data>
    <Data>System.IndexOutOfRangeException</Data>
    <Data>8e38</Data>
    <Data>14.03.0224.001</Data>
    <Data>False</Data>
    <Data>
    </Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
What to do ?
Best Regards
John B

Hi John,
Please type
outlook /safe in RUN to start Outlook in safe mode and then check if this issue still exists. Meanwhile, please run Exchange Best Practices Analyzer and check if find relevant issues.
à
This message could not be sent. Try to send the message again later, or contact the networkadministrator.
Error [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].
The issue typically occurs if send messages to a large number of recipients.
When this issue occurred, did you check if send message successfully via OWA?
à
We have looked on the problem and found a Microsoft article about rollup 8 where they said DO NOT INSTALL
Did you mean this article:
Exchange releases: December 2014?
à
We ran Windows Update again on the 13/12/2014 where Rollup 7 was installed
From the Event ID 4999, I noticed that point to
14.03.0224.001, it should mean the old Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8. From above
mentioned article (Exchange releases: December 2014),
Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8 has been re-released to the Microsoft download center resolving a regression discovered in the initial release. The update RU8 package
corrects the issue which impacted users connecting to Exchange from Outlook. The updated RU8 package is version number 14.03.0224.002. Just a confirmation, did you
reinstall that re-released Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8? Any difference?
If any update, please feel free to let me know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Exchange 2010 3 node DAG and split datacenters

Hi all,
I have a Exchange 2010 setup with 3 DAG nodes, 2 servers in Primary site & one in DR site, 2 active directory Sites, one domain controller per site. All roles on each server.
Each server has a single NIC, with the following configs:
Primary Site:
MBX1 IP = 192.168.1.11 - Network Name MAPI-Primary
MBX2 IP = 192.168.1.12 - Network Name MAPI-Primary
Cluster IP = 192.168.1.10
DR Site:
DRMBX1 IP = 192.168.100.11 - Network Name MAPI-DR
Cluster IP = 192.168.100.10
Dag name = DAG1
Under the DAG Networks, I see 3 Networks
DAG1_MAP1-Primary with the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet and the 2 MBX Network IP's in it.
DAG1_MAP1-DR with the 192.168.100.0/24 subnet and the 1 DR MBX Network IP in it.
and one called DAG1_Replication, which has a 10.1.1.0/24 subnet and NO NIC's in it. I think this was an original replication subnet used when there was only 2 nodes in the DAG and a cross over cable was used.
Can I delete the DAG_Replication network from the config?
Should I consolidate the 2 DAG1_MAPI-Primary and DAG1-MAPI-DR networks under one simply called DAG1-MAPI?
Secondly,
When I look at cluster manager on each of the 2 Nodes MBX1/2, I can see the 3 Nodes. Trying to run cluster manager on the DR node, and I can't connect to the DAG1 cluster, get an error saying not ready. Am I right in thinking this should not be
happening? I have a managed firewall, but don't have access too logs, any idea what ports could be dropped from DRMBX1?
Finally,
Cluster manager on the 2 working nodes shows an error:
Cluster Network Name is not online, and the Cluster Core resources panel shows cluster name DAG1 Offline, with ONLY 1 IP address, the DAG VIP (192.168.1.10) being online. Should I see the other 192.168.100.10 DAG VIP as well? Is this also a manifestation
of the firewall?
I have inherited this config, so I am not fully sure what a correct working condition should report look like. Any help on a clearer understanding would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance !!

In answer to your first question, yes, if no server is listed with an IP address in that replication network, you can delete it without affecting the DAG operations.
As for your second question, if your servers are in different subnets, you need at least two networks defined in your DAG. And since your servers are in different Windows sites, I have to assume they are in different subnets. I believe that if
you check them in the EMC, you will only see IP addresses for the local servers in each network. So no consolidation is possible.
On your question about Cluster Manager, don't do anything in Cluster Manager - my personal experience has been that the Exchange toolset is sufficient for all management tasks related to an Exchange DAG. What are you trying to determine? Also,
Microsoft doesn't support a DAG installed across a firewall - either you open all ports between these servers (and all domain controllers in your forest), or you will have an unsupported configuration.
For your final question, I assume DAG1 is your DAG's network name, and those two IPs are the ones for the two datacenters. If this is the case, only one IP address will be active at a time.

Data Protection Manager 2012 on Hyper-V Windows 2008 R2 and NAS connectivity

Hi, we currently use Symantec Backup Exec 2010/2012 on Windows 2008 R2 servers storing the data on two LAN-connected NAS servers. As part of our MS licensing package, we have obtained System Center 2012. I'm seeing if DPM can replace our BE software, but
I'm running into a major hurdle, I can't connect (Add) either of the NAS machines. I see on DPM posts where you need to have a physical connection to the NAS (iSCSi or fiber channel) not an option on the NAS (Thecus N8800 & N8900 (no ability to add cards)
and SMB 3.0 (appears to be a Windows 2012-only option ... I dread 2012 and don't want to move to it right now). Can my virtualized (hyper-v) W2008 R2 server see a non-connected NAS and if so, how do I pull this off.
Thanks

Hi
DPM needs local storage to connect to. you cannot use a NAS or USB device to backup to like with other backup software.

Windows 2008 Server and Windows 8 clients

Hey Guys,
I have had this problem for sometime now and really need a solution. I have Windows 2008 Enterprise Server running about 200+ terminal services clients. All Windows XP clients are fine, Windows 7 clients have issues when they get an updated version of
remote desktop client(to solve the issue we simply rollback the update), Windows 8 clients cannot connect and use out remote app. The issue stems from the newer version of remote desktop client (on windows 7 and embedded in windows 8) cannot connect to our
terminal server and generates an error and immediately disconnects. The error says "
Your computer can't connect to the remote computer because an error occurred on the remote computer that you want
to connect to
So my questions are, how can i update my Windows 2008 Terminal server version to support these clients, or do u have migrate to Windows 2012? Or is there a solution to my current problem which will allow my client to connect and use the remoteapps?

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
Please follow the below steps and verify result.
LAN manager authentication level settings (Local security policy->Local Policies->Security Options->Network Security: LAN Manager Authentication level).
Try to change it to "Send NTLMv2 response only"
Snap:
If still face the issue please install this Hotfix.
RDS client computer cannot connect to the RDS server by using a remote desktop connection in Windows
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2752618/
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Windows 2008 Server and HP Color LaserJet 2605dn Driver Issue when Sharing Printer

I have a HP Color LaserJet 2605dn printer that I need to setup on a Windows 2008 server. I need the server to act as a Print server, but I have been unable to get any drivers to load other than the 64 Bit Universal drivers. Because most of the company uses XP (32 and 64 bit), I also need to load those drivers under additional drivers; however, I have been unable to load them, when I point to the INF file (any of the 10 that unzip from the driver package), it says it is not for this printer. I have even tried the generic 32 bit PS and it says the same thing. Any ideas on what I am doing incorrectly or where to get the drivers that I need?
Thanks,
Gary

Hello, I have the same problem. For the 2605 Printer is only the universal print driver available. Is seems that HP is to be lazy about making new 2008 driver.

Interesting problem with RAID, Windows 2008 server, and Ubuntu

sooooo, i got the system working and linux loved it. just adored it.
however, Windows did not. Windwos 2008 server hard locks from time to time. i fianlly figured out that it had to do with the RAID 0 i was running, that didn't really succeed.
However, when i rebuilt the RAID and everything on it, it refuses to recognize the disk, sayign that windwos cannot determine if this drive has a valid system volume on it.
Ubuntu 9.04 server, however, just took it and made it work great.
I enabled the PCI Bus SATA to be Master in the BIOS, and then Windows Server 2008 said that it could not determine if the drive was bootable. Then i went back and redid the raid, and it did the original error.
I inserted a windows xp disk, destroyed the RAID, and then installed the software on a NEW disk. While it installed fine, it gave me an IRQL_not_less_than_or_equal error. It boots in safe mode, but no where else. I tried installing the NVRAID and MCP55 drivers in safemode and what not, but still, it refused to cooperate. I went back to ubuntu, this time the desktop/workstation versions, and i am doing an alternate install with RAID...much to my disappointment becuase now i will have to use VirtualBox to isntall windows...and if that fails, i'll be really pissed.
My settings are as follows:
SATA Controller 0-5 enabled
NVRAID- enabled
PCI BUS SATA- Option ROM Enabled, Master Enabled, and 0040h latency
MAC LAN- same as above
MAC LAN1- has master disabled, but the other stuff is the same
Serial port A is on AUTO, B is disabled, and floppy is disabled.
Option Rom is PFA relocation.
Also, my AEC A6880 is giving me a ROM expansion error, even though, in both OSes it can be seen....usualy. I just want to fix it
lastly, my LSI PCI-E scsi adapter is not being seen at ALL.
thanks guys.

Quote
Also, my AEC A6880 is giving me a ROM expansion error, even though, in both OSes it can be seen....usualy. I just want to fix it
lastly, my LSI PCI-E scsi adapter is not being seen at ALL.
Turn off onboard raid ctrl 1st. There are conflicting.
Quote
I enabled the PCI Bus SATA to be Master in the BIOS, and then Windows Server 2008 said that it could not determine if the drive was bootable.
Known issue, partition mess:
http://www.google.bg/search?hl=bg&ei=W-l3Sq_4NMbdsgbHnKmmBQ&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=windows+cannot+determine+if+this+drive+has+a+valid+system+volume+on+it.&spell=1
Quote
I inserted a windows xp disk, destroyed the RAID, and then installed the software on a NEW disk. While it installed fine, it gave me an IRQL_not_less_than_or_equal error. It boots in safe mode, but no where else. I tried installing the NVRAID and MCP55 drivers in safemode and what not, but still, it refused to cooperate.
What's the BSOD error? Are you using XP installation disk with included SP3?

SQL Express 2008 R2 and SQL 2005 Server SP1 in single Windows 2003 server

Hi,
I am using a Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Ed SP2 OS with SQL 2005 SP1 intallled on it for our Nav 5 database.
As my backup software requires SQL Express 2008 R2 as default daabase, is it possible to install this in the same server with the SQL 2005 currently running on it? Would there be any impact on the existing SQL 2005 and the application and the Navision database
on it?
Appreciate your help.
Sharon Lo

Hi,
I am using a Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Ed SP2 OS with SQL 2005 SP1 intallled on it for our Nav 5 database.
As my backup software requires SQL Express 2008 R2 as default daabase, is it possible to install this in the same server with the SQL 2005 currently running on it? Would there be any impact on the existing SQL 2005 and the application and the Navision database
on it?
There is no issue with installing multiple versions of SQL Server on a machine.I have SS 2005 ,2008 R2 and 2012 all on same machine and they work just fine. You can install all version instances side by side and all will work independently from
each other.
Now issue which might cause problem your SQL Server 2005 is SP1 which is a Blunder IMO. Please ASAP patch it to SP4 because you are running very old version of 2005 which is unsupported by Microsoft and also SP4 includes MANY fixes for SQLServer
2005. Applying SP4 will fix many issues and will bring you under Microsoft support.
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles

DHCP Failover in Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 2012 R2 Environment

Hi Everyone,
We are trying to implement DHCP failover in our environment. Our IT Infrastructure consists of 4 – windows server 2008 R2 servers and 7 – Windows Server 2012 servers; 1 Main Office with 2 – DC’s and 9 branch/remote offices with one DNS server in every remote
office. All the DNS servers have 2 scopes defined on them for VOICE and Data with different Subnets.
What would be the best method to implement failover in 2008 R2 – Windows Failover Cluster or Split scope? And how to implement DHCP Failover in Windows Server 2012 R2?
Please let me know if you need more information.
Thank you for your help!
-kN

Hi,
if you can choose between 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 than go with 2012 R2 it is easy to create a DHCP failover there. Actually that is one of the new features of Windows 2012.
With Server 2012 you setup your fist DHCP server with the scopes you want to setup. Than you install the second 2012 server with DHCP role and authorized. If you have done this you going back to your first server, where you already configured your scopes.
Now right click onto the scope you want to setup for failover and select 'Configure Failover'. You can than set it up as kind of split scope (Load balance Mode) or as real fail over setup (Hot Standby). In Load balance Mode you can configure the balance of
IP addresses between the both servers, like primary has 60% IP addresses and secondary has 40%.
With Server 2008 R2 the easiest configuration is split scope. But here it depends how many IP leases you will max have and if you can absorb if one of the server is going down. Lets say you have 50 DHCP leases max, than sure, set it up as split scope. But
if you have 200 DHCP clients, than I would go with failover cluster. At the end it depends on your environment.
Sven

Exchange 2010 Service Pack 1 and Unity 7.0(2)

We are in the process of migrating from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. We had everything working with 2010, but wanted to install SP1 prior to migrating users over to the new Exchange server.
After installing SP1, messages are no longer being transfered to the Exchange server. We've re-run the permissions wizard, thinking that the update may have undone some permission setting. This succeeded, but we still get nothing.
Has anyone else installed SP1 for Exchange 2010? If so, any issues?

For those with Unity 7.0(2) integration with Exchange 2010, please refer to this defect CSCti70702 and you may find your answer to the multiple issues you are experienced. It has to do with MS/CDO library.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12848
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2405611

Exchange 2010 , Windows 2008 R2 and framework 3.5 SP1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for