Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence DAG functionality?

Hi, so this is a bit of a silly question. But I need to make sure I understood the situation correctly.
I currently have an Exchange 2010 DAG with 2 servers and I am mid way through (In the Exchange Server Deployment Assistant) introducing my first Exchange 2013 server.
The plan is to make the new 2013 server the active DAG member one of the old 2010 servers the passive member for a short term until that 2010 server is rebuilt to 2013, but that's not going to work is it? Once I migrate a 2010 user to a 2013 database, that
user only exists in 2013, right?
Theres no way of adding a 2013 database into a 2010 DAG, so that if the 2013 server is down, the 2010 server will become active?
Thanks

No, there is not. You will build a new Exchange 2013 DAG and move mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 mailbox databases.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Similar Messages

Exchange 2013 / 2010 coexistence with different public domains

Currently in my organization
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Client Access / Hub Transport
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Unified Messaging Server (we also have Lync 2013 in the environment)
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Mailbox
In my organization, we have approximately 600 mailboxes - 100 office staff, and 500 field employees using a mixture of Outlook 2007/2010/2013 and various mobile devices. Most of our field employees are in remote locations, several hundred
miles away. We have no IT staff in any of our field locations.
We also have two public domains that we use, though we are trying to phase out the old one to unify everything.
domain-old.com - Used when the company had a different name. All Exchange services are published with this one.
domain-new.com - Used after the company changed names. The goal is to publish all Exchange services with this one.
domain.local - Our internal Active Directory domain.
We use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for all inbound/outbound email. We publish OWA, ActiveSync, etc. through our Sophos firewall. Also, we have two KEMP LoadMaster appliances that for high availability that we currently use for Lync 2013; they are
severely underutilized.
Goals for the Exchange migration
My primary goal is to introduce high availability into our environment by introducing redundancy on multiple levels. I would like to accomplish this by utilizing Exchange 2013 since we will need to purchase additional licensing anyway. My idea of the
final topology is:
2x KEMP LoadMaster appliances providing reverse proxy and load balancing to the CAS servers
2x Physical servers running Hyper-V, separated physically but in the same AD site. Each one would run:
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Standard w/SP1 - Client Access
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Enterprise w/SP1 - Mailbox - Utilizing DAGs for high-availability
I'd like all the new Exchange services to be published under the domain-new.com domain - such as mail.domain-new.com, mail.domain-new.com/owa, smtp.domain-new.com, etc.
We have purchased two new physical servers that will be Hyper-V hosts running Server 2012R2. My timeframe to start this project is within the next two weeks, so I'll be running the new Exchange 2013 VMs under Server 2012, not R2 as it won't be supported
until Exchange 2013 SP3 is released.
Deployment Plan
Install Exchange 2013 on new VMs.
Create CAS Array object.
Configure Exchange 2013 to publish under the new namespace.
Perform mailbox moves to 2013 for a small group (1-5 users) at a time. Recreate Outlook profiles and mobile device profiles for that group. Test and move to the next group.
Once all users are moved to the new namespace, decommission the Exchange 2010 servers.
Unknowns
My primary unknown is about the namespaces. All of the guides I have read strictly deal with keeping the existing namespace and having the Exchange 2013 CAS proxy requests to Exchange 2010 for mailboxes still on 2010. This should never be an issue for us
since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move.
My question boils down to, is this a supported way to migrate to Exchange 2013? And if so, are there some materials or information to help me perform it this way?

Hi,
From the description, you want to install Exchange 2013 in another domain and then migrate from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013.
About DAG, all servers in a DAG must be running the same operating system. If there is only one mailbox server, there is no need to deploy DAG.
About CAS array, we should know that the CAS Array no longer exists in Exchange 2013.
About the namespace, based on my knowledge, we can introduce a new namespace. Just as what you said "This should never be an issue for us since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move".
Here are some articles about how to upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 in the same organization.
Checklist: Upgrade from Exchange 2010
Install Exchange 2013 in an Existing Exchange 2010 Organization
Upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013/2010 - Co-Existence, URLs.

Hey Team,
I am sure this is well documented and i for some reason cant seem to get good solid answer. But here is my questions. what are the correct URL settings for (OWA, ActiveSync, EWS) etc for Exchange 2013/2010 in a coexistence scenario?
1) All servers in the same ad site
2) mail. autodiscover, pointed to the 2013 server
3) 2013 server is internet connected.
Am i supposed to clear all the 2010 URLs?, Just the external ones? Use a separate namespace?
Thanks,
Robert
Robert

This is well documented in the below post, I would recommend you check it:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/12/client-connectivity-in-an-exchange-2013-coexistence-environment.aspx
In Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence scenario, CAS 2013 will proxy all connections to Exchange 2010.
How CAS2013 Picks a Target Legacy Exchange Server
It’s important to understand that when CAS2013 proxies to a legacy Exchange Client Access server, it constructs a URL based on the server FQDN, not a load balanced namespace or the InternalURL value.
When a CAS2013 starts up, it connects to Active Directory and enumerates a topology map to understand all the Client Access servers that exist within the environment. Every 50 seconds, CAS2013 will send a lightweight request to each
protocol end point to all the Client Access servers in the topology map; these requests have a user agent string of HttpProxy.ClientAccessServer2010Ping
Mohammad Saeed Abdelaziz | MCSE 2003 | MCTS: Lync, OCS, Exchange2007 | CCNP | UC Voice Specialist http://lyncrocks.wordpress.com/

RPC over HTTP trouble Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence, 2013 RPCProxy cannot ping GC.

I currently have an Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence scenario which gives me trouble with the RPC over HTTP part with users with a 2007 mailbox. the MS RCA website performs 2 tests with the MAPI address book endpoints, once against a 2007 mailbox server and
once a against a GC/DC, the last one fails. The logs are from our test domain, but the exact same happens in the production domain. running CU8 (recently upgraded, but problem was exactly the same with CU7)
Testing the MAPI Address Book endpoint on the Exchange server.
The address book endpoint was tested successfully.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 7872 ms.
Test Steps
Attempting to ping the MAPI Address Book endpoint with identity: exmb11.domain.test:6004.
The endpoint was pinged successfully.
Additional Details
The endpoint responded in 156 ms.
Elapsed Time: 4153 ms.
Testing the MAPI Address Book endpoint on the Exchange server.
An error occurred while testing the address book endpoint.
Additional Details
Elapsed Time: 3079 ms.
Test Steps
Attempting to ping the MAPI Address Book endpoint with identity: tdc01421.domain.test:6004.
The attempt to ping the endpoint failed.
<label for="testSelectWizard_ctl12_ctl06_ctl02_ctl09_ctl00_tmmArrow">Tell
me more about this issue and how to resolve it</label>
Additional Details
The RPC_S_SERVER_UNAVAILABLE error (0x6ba) was thrown by the RPC Runtime process.
Elapsed Time: 3079 ms.
texmb11 = ex2007 mailbox
texfr11 = ex2007 CAS
tdc01421 = DC/GC
texch31 = 2013 multirole
other symptoms :
Browser test
https://texch31.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?texmb11:6004
--> 503 (which is correct)
https://texch31.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?tdc01421:6004
--> 404.0 Not Found
RPCPing
rpcping -t ncacn_http -s texmb11 -o RpcProxy=texch31.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
Success
rpcping -t ncacn_http -s tdc01421 -o RpcProxy=texch31.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
Fails!
so the Ex2013 RPCProxy doesn't proxy to the DC/GC, but the RPCProxy to an ex2007 mailbox server works fine, so the authentication methods configured are correct i'd say..
the same tests using the ex2007CAS server as RPC proxy all succeed!:
MS RCA is all green
https://texfr11.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?texmb11:6004
--> 503
https://texfr11.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?tdc01421:6004
--> 503
rpcping -t ncacn_http -s texmb11 -o RpcProxy=texfr11.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
Success
rpcping -t ncacn_http -s tdc01421 -o RpcProxy=texfr11.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
Success!!
Logs
all tries against the 2013 CAS server generate '404' log entries in several logs int the Logging directory, the most explicit being the one in Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Logging\HttpProxy\RpcHttp : HttpProxy_xxxxxx.LOG
2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z,895cdf07-f2eb-4beb-b787-da02ba11b0c2,15,0,1076,0,,RpcHttp,webmail.domain.test,/rpc/rpcproxy.dll,,Basic,true,DOM\user,,,MSRPC,10.10.142.132,TEXCH31,404,,MailboxGuidWithDomainNotFound,RPC_IN_DATA,,,,,,,,,4,,,,1,,,0,,0,,0,0,,0,2,0,,,,,,,,,1,1,0,,1,,2,2,,?TDC01422.domain.test:6004,,BeginRequest=2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z;CorrelationID=<empty>;ProxyState-Run=None;ProxyState-Complete=CalculateBackEnd;EndRequest=2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z;,HttpProxyException=Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.HttpProxyException:
RPC server name passed in by client could not be resolved: TDC01422.domain.test at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.RpcHttpProxyRequestHandler.ResolveToDefaultAnchorMailbox(String originalRpcServerName String reason) at
Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.RpcHttpProxyRequestHandler.ResolveAnchorMailbox() at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.ProxyRequestHandler.InternalBeginCalculateTargetBackEnd(AnchorMailbox& anchorMailbox) at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.ProxyRequestHandler.<BeginCalculateTargetBackEnd>b__3b();
the error suggests the name could not be resolved. but nslookup works fine. i can ping the tdc01421 correctly form texch31, it returns me the ipv4 address. i can telnet to port 6004 from texch31 server to tdc01421 giving me the correct 'ncacn_http' answer..
i look at the 'ValidPorts' and ValidPorts_Autoconfig_Exchange reg keys and filled them with the same i have on the 2007cas servers (all ex servers, all dc/gc's, all of them with netbios & fqdn ports 6001,6002 & 6004..) but also no success.
im out of ideas by now..

Hello togehter,
if anyone is using the Interim Update (Hotfix) "Exchange2013-KB2997209_2997847-x64-en.msp" please be aware of the following bug in this hotfix:
NOTE: Another issue that we have seen only from some E2013 On-Premises customers who installed
fixes for any of the above E2013 CU6 related issues is that “Using OWA, users cannot create new messages or reply to existing messages” – These are mostly installer issues where OWA files are not copying correctly in the new version directory. Ideally the
content of these two folders, i.e. “V15\ClientAccess\Owa\prem\15.0.995.31” and “V15\ClientAccess\Owa\prem\15.0.995.29” should be identical, now if for any reason, they are not then it can break the OWA experience like described above. Take these steps if you
run into related issues:
-Backup the contents of “15.0.995.31” folder to a different folder/directory
-Copy the files and folders from “15.0.995.29” to “15.0.995.31” folder – this should fix the issue …
Best,
Martin

Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence: The Name on the Security Certificate is Invalid or Does Not Match the Name of the Site.

In the midst of Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence configuration.
Currently:
Exchange 2007:
2 CAS\HUB
1 Mailbox server
Exchange 2013 (2 sites):
LA:
1 CAS
2 MBX servers
MKE:
1 CAS
2 MBX servers.
We purchased a certificate from Digicert and added every SAN name we could think of including "legacy.companyname.com", just to be sure. Added certificate to Exchange 2013 CAS servers and 2007 CAS\HUB boxes. Configured virtual directories on Exchange
2013 MKE-CAS01 but not on Exchange 2013 LA-CAS01. Configured virtual directories to on Exchange 2007 CAS\HUB to point to "legacy.companyname.com".
Mailboxes have not been moved yet. I just wanted to get the coexistence between Exchange 2013/2007 up first but some users (not all) receiving
"The name of the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site" for
"LEGACY.COMPANYNAME.COM". I remember configuring the AUTODISCOVER virtual directory for Exchange 2007. Any ideas? Thank you.

Hi,
Please make sure that the certificate with "legacy.companyname.com" name is enabled for IIS service. We can check it by running the following command in Exchange server 2007:
Get-ExchangeCertificate | FL
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013 CU6 with DAG - ECP Delete does not go to soft-delete state, retention policy ignored

I am not sure if this is a BUG or this is as intended. Typically if a mailbox is 'deleted' from the EAC or ECP console the user account is disabled and the mailbox is marked for removal (soft-delete) until the retention policy expires the item (default
30 days). However we deleted a mailbox and the mailbox was purged immediately as well as the user was moved to the hidden recycle bin in Active Directory.
We replicated this issue twice in a DAG environment, we do not have this issue in a non-DAG environment.
Question: Other than restoring from the backup, is there a way to recover the mailbox?
Thank You,
-Jake
Jacob Evans Jake of All Trades

Hi,
I tested in my lab, Exchange 2013 CU1 with DAG deployed, if I deleted a mailbox from EAC, then it would be a disconnected mailbox and the associated Active Directory user account was also deleted. I could find it under the Disconnected Mailbox.
Was the mailbox logged ever?
If you delete a mailbox that you never log in, it won't show as disconnected mailbox.
And for the question :"Question: Other than restoring from the backup, is there a way to recover the mailbox?", I'm afraid you have to recover from backup.
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013 Sp1 Coexistence with Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5 HTTP 500

I`m trying to make working OWA coexistence between Exchange 2013 SP1 and Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5.
When user login in to OWA where his mailbox is located on Exchange 2013 server it logon successful and owa opened. When i try to login to the same url with user whose mailbox is located on Exchange 2010 server i get Error http 50
The website cannot display the page : HTTP 500 »https://URLEXCHANGE2013/owa/auth.owa«
The same is, when i use https:// URLEXCHANGE2013/ecp?ExchClientVer=14
URL on Exchange 2013 are different as fro Exchange 2010.
I even tried to setup Internal URL for Exchange 2010 to bi set to »null ,Saem error
Exchange server 2013 Sp1 is installed on Windows server 2012 R2.

Assumption is correct. I have even enable verbose logging, and i can see MSExchange Front End HTTP Proxy , that successfully connect to Exchange 2010 server.
But remember Exchange 2013 is fresh installation on Windows server 2012 R2.
IIS LOG
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0&cafeReqId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0;
443 companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 200 0 0 5484
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4&cafeReqId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4;
443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 0
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401&cafeReqId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401;
443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 15
2014-03-04 08:52:55 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=551cfdd9-18ac-42d8-aea3-cbb546c9d9fb; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/
302 0 0 9937
2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c1b97df9-ec56-4906-b2f5-965551b720ae; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
https://OWA.company.com/ 200 0 0 1015
2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b92ca682-04f4-4d4f-931e-9a95680ab9ea; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
- 200 0 0 671
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=093bd01a-de59-4519-80f6-067484122091; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c2f7565d-ee6a-48f8-8d86-16d5d3ca65c1; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=ba633030-2376-4bad-a32f-8f160bd87bd4; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=5e94172c-d97c-46a9-a602-6030d6f7da2c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9ba2caf3-2a03-44a2-8477-2724689e139c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 46
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/15.0.847/scripts/premium/flogon.js &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=62bb4655-3bfa-4e07-aa62-27c93e7e8b4d; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:59 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9d52ec1a-2ee1-4954-85e6-89e7e5df407a; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 302 0 0 812
2014-03-04 08:52:59 ::1 GET /OWA/Calendar/[email protected]/calendar/calendar.html &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=4ea66475-9a47-41a4-81cb-6b569715d0d6; 443 - ::1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 200 0 0 8859
2014-03-04 08:53:01 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b3db7480-2192-436c-b01d-29d0e528cfec; 443 UseronEX2010 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/owa/auth/logon.aspx?replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f
500 0 0 187
2014-03-04 08:53:04 127.0.0.1 GET /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/default.eas &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=2e2a655b-00b9-42ae-8789-1e452e6579c3; 443 [email protected] 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess
- 200 0 0 8265
2014-03-04 08:53:14 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8741886f-b9b1-46f9-8c15-baf35809a12c; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 15265
2014-03-04 08:53:14 127.0.0.1 GET /OWA/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8ad938fb-f2c3-42bf-8718-da62b122422c; 443 - 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 302 0 0 15
HTTPERR LOG :
2014-03-04 08:51:48 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:51:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:25 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:25 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:30 127.0.0.1 14122 127.0.0.1 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /RPC/[email protected] 404 - NotFound -
2014-03-04 08:52:30 ::1%0 14121 ::1%0 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /ecp/ReportingWebService/ 404 - NotFound -
2014-03-04 08:54:42 ::1%0 14117 ::1%0 444 - - - - - Timer_ConnectionIdle -
2014-03-04 08:54:48 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:54:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:55:35 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:55:35 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
Trace login, ok it is xml, so print is..
-Request Summary
Site
1
Process
8232
Failure Reason
STATUS_CODE
Trigger Status
500
Final Status
500
Time Taken
500 msec
Url
http://EXCH2013.companyNT.local:80/powershell?clientApplication=ActiveMonitor;PSVersion=4.0&sessionID=Version_15.0_(Build_846.0)=rJqNiZqNgZuQkpqT0pqH0ZuQkpqTkYvRk5CcnpOBzsbLzsbGyczJyIHPzNDPy9DNz87L38/Gxc/KxcrJ
App Pool
MSExchangePowerShellFrontEndAppPool
Authentication
Kerberos
User from token
companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb
Activity ID
{8000134C-0001-E300-B63F-84710C7967BB}
-Errors & Warnings
No.↓
Severity
Event
Module Name
157. view trace
Warning
-MODULE_SET_RESPONSE_ERROR_STATUS
ModuleName
ManagedPipelineHandler
Notification
EXECUTE_REQUEST_HANDLER
HttpStatus
500
HttpReason
Request Failed
HttpSubStatus
0
ErrorCode
The operation completed successfully.
(0x0)
ConfigExceptionInfo
ManagedPipelineHandler
See all events for the request

Exchange 2013 in coexistence with 2010, Outlook keep looking for Exchange 2010 server slow connection

All,
not sure if this topic has already answered, but can't find anything around.
Here's the scenario. Migrating from a single Exchange 2010 to a cluster of 2 + 1 Exchange 2013. Two in a site, One in the other site (DC).
I have migrated successfully a firsat batch of users. Mail flow works perfectly. The only thing is that often the migrated users are experiencing a long time (about 30 minutes) to get their Outlook syncronized. Both OL 2010 and 2013 doesn't make any difference.
They're using OL Anywhere, and I've already tried to rebuild the profile.
From a check on the OL connection status, looks like they're still looking for something on EX2010, but no idea what could be. If I disable the cache mode it works smooth and quick.
My best guess is that is something in cache they're trying to keep updated... but still this doesn't explain the huge delay.
Any help would be highly appreciated!
Thanks!

Hi Alessandro,
What happens in OWA? I guess it should be good.
Did you have public folders with Exchange 2010? Were they moved over to Exch 2013? Technically you should move the PF to the latest version from the legacy version before moving over the users?
- Moved the PF to OL2013. same behaviour
May be the outlook clients are looking for th OAB? Did you move the OAB to Exchange 2013?
- Did this too.
Try running outlook on safe mode and see what happens? may be one of the outlook add-in's are looking for something on Exchange 2010?
- Will try that....
Can you do a Test Email Auto Configuration in outlook (Hold CNTRL key and right click on outlook icon on status bar) and see if the exchange url's are pointed to Exch 2013?
- Will try that....
Is this happening to all migrated users or specific? Are they BlackBerry users?
- All users and there are no BB users
Do you have any archived emails on those migrated users? May be outlook is looking for some archived stuff on the Exch 2010 side?
- I instructed Exchange to migrate also the archiving database, however There are no archived mailbox on 2010
Could this be because of any calendar entries? May be migrated user mailboxes are having issues with working with non-migrated mailbox calendars?
- This maybe a possibility. I have only 10 users actively using Exchange, while all others have the mailboxes only because they've Lync. I've completed all migrations today, so there shouldn't be anything left on 2010
Let me know how it went - all the best!
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. Regards, Siva

Exchange 2013 ECP and DAG issue

Good Day,
We have Exchange 2013 setup in Coexistence with Exchange 2007. Everything is working well except for two small issues I have noticed.
Current Setup of 2013:
SiteA:
2x CAS Servers on Windows 2012 R2 configured with windows NLB (Internet Facing).
2x MBX servers Configured in a DAG also running on Windows 2012 R2.
SiteB:
2x CAS Server on Windows 2012 R2.
2x MBX servers Configured in a DAG also running on Windows 2012 R2.
Issues I am having:
Issue 1:
When working on the ECP:
I can do all tasks on servers in the same site but get some errors when trying to do tasks on servers in the other site.
When trying to Activate a DB copy on the DAG at SiteB I get "The Microsoft Exchange Replication service does not appear to be running on Server name"
And just trying to go to the properties of a server at SiteB "An error occurred while accessing the registry on the server servername"
This happens vice versa.
I can access all servers on the same site but not between sites with some tasks.
I have made sure firewall is disabled and remote registry is indeed running but no luck.
From a network perspective all ports are open between the sites.
Issue 2:
When I reboot a DAG member with the active mailbox databases for testing outlook connectivity I get two issues.
Then I cannot access ECP at all until the server is up again.
Outlook keeps staying on trying to connect until it is reopened.
Any Ideas?
I will gladly give more information if needed.
Thank You
Riaan Rourke
Senior System Engineer

Since I don't see this with Hyper-V I'll assume this is on ESX. Please let me know it that's not correct.
In terms of virtualization best practices - whose list was that :)
There are multiple configuration things that you *MUST* do when using WLBS on ESX. It will depend upon multiple things in the environment. I'd start with this
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1556
Fix that, and chances are the other item will be also remediated.
Cheers,
Rhoderick
Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
Blog:
http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne
Twitter:   LinkedIn:
  Facebook:
  XING:
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

Exchange 2013 / 2010 co-existence - Outlook won't connect to Exchange 2010 mailboxes

Greetings! I have a lab set up at home where I have been testing co-existence of Exchange 2013 and 2010 for a future corporate upgrade project.
I am running into some odd behavior. Any mailbox that has been migrated to Exchange 2013 works just fine, however, when I try to set up Outlook for a mailbox still on Exchange 2010 I receive errors. OWA works just fine for these Exchange
2010 mailboxes, it is just Outlook that has the problem. This is what I am running into:
1. Outlook uses autodiscover to locate server settings. It fails at the 'logging on to mail server' step saying that Exchange isn't available; Outlook must be connected, etc.
2. It then gives me the settings box for Exchange server and Mailbox. This is auto populated with one of the Exchange 2013 servers (there are 3 of them, all have both MBX and CAS role). If I then change the server to the Exchange 2010 CAS server,
and hit 'check names', it underlines the very same entries (like it found them this time) that were there initially and goes on to finish the configuration.
3. When I launch Outlook with this Exchange 2010 user, it fails to open with the error message that the set of folders couldn't be opened.
I've been doing as much research on this as I can. I've tried disabling IPv6 to no avail. It seems as if perhaps the issue is with Exchange 2013 proxying the request back to the Exchange 2010 servers but I am not sure what to check in that regards.
Any suggestions? Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Don´t disable IPV6 on an Exchange Server, it is, in my opinion not necessary - also applies for AD.
You can use your original SSL Cert for your new Ex 2013 environment.
In dns you want two host A records: mail.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com
On your 2013 set your internal and external virtual directories to mail.domain.com
leave autodiscover and Powershell alone.
Also set the autodiscover URI to your Certificate name ie. mail.domain.com
Set-ClientAccessServer -Identity "YourCASServer" -AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri "https://mail.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml"
Thanks. I wanted to give some additional info before I run any commands. I currently have an A record for autodiscover and it is pointed to the Exchange 2013 DAG/cluster IP. I have a 3 entries for mail.domain, for DNS round robin; basically
it is listed 3 times for the IP of each of my Exchange 2013 servers. Does any of this sound problematic?

User calendar sharing problem on Exchange 2013 & 2010 co-existence

Recently, I am trying to upgrade my site to Exchange 2013 from 2010. Most of the functions are work without problem except 2013 mailbox user try to access the sharing calendar on Exchange 2010 mailbox server.
e.g. User A is exchange 2010 mailbox user
user create a calendar 'testing' and sharing with user B
who is exchange 2013 mailbox user when user B try to add the calendar in OWA, user B get
'The action couldn't be completed.
An error occurred and your request couldn't be completed. If the problem continuesm contact your helpdesk with this HTTP Status code: 500.'
Actually, the error is 'The Client Access server version doesn't match the Mailbox server version of the resource that was being accessed. To determine the correct URL to use to access the resource, use Autodiscover with the address of the resource.'
But there are no problem if user A sharing his own calendar. User B could add it without problem.

user B can access the calendar from outlook ? if its still not working from outlook please try to repair outlook profile and check
Regards
John
Thanks for your reply. However, user B could not add the calendar in OWA 2013. I think, it doesn't related to outlook profile.

Exchange 2013 MBX in DAG along with Hyper-V and Failover Cluster

Hi Guys! I've tried to find out an answer of my question or some kind of solution, but with no luck that's why I am writing here. The case is as follows. I have two powerful server boxes and iSCSI storage and I have to design high availability
solution, which includes SCOM 2012, SC DPM 2012 and exchange 2013 (two CAS+HUB servers and two MBX servers).
Let me tell you how I plan to do that and you will correct me if proposed solution is wrong.
1. On both hosts - add Hyper-V role.
2. On both hosts - add failover clustering role.
3. Create 2 VMs through failover cluster manager, VMs will be stored on a iSCSI LUN, the first one VM for SCOM 2012 and the second one for SCDPM 2012. Both VMs will be added as failover resource.
4. Create 4 VMs - 2 for CAS+HUB role and 2 for MBX role, VMs will be stored on a iSCSI LUN as well.
5. Create a DAG within the two MBX servers.
In general, that's all. What I wonder is whether I can use failover clustering to acheive High Availability for 2 VMs and at the same time to create DAG between MBX-servers and NLB between CAS-servers?
Excuse me for this question, but I am not proficient in this matter.

Hi,
As far as I know, it’s supported to create DAG for mailbox server installed in hyper-v server.
And since load balance has been changed for CAS 2013, it is more worth with DNS round robin instead of NLB. However, you can use NLB in Exchange 2013.
For more information, you can refer to the following article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj898588(v=exchg.150).aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013 & 2010 coexist problem. Authentication Credentials Prompt in Outlook

Hello Forum
We have two Exchange servers coexisting together. A new 2013 and a old 2010.
Everything was setup with the help of the Exchange Deployment Assistant.
I have had alot of trouble with Outlook 2013 Prompting for credentials on Exchange 2013 Mailboxes. None of the 2010 Mailboxes expericence this popup.
I solved most of the popup issues with this by changing the ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod to ntlm.(from negotiate)
http://blog.gothamtg.com/2013/10/15/users-constantly-prompted-for-credentials-after-being-migrated-to-exchange-2013/
and installing this update for Outlook:
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2899504/en-us
Now 2013 Mailboxes Work without any anoying popups. Except when they try to open another users mailbox that is located on the old 2010 server or a shared 2010 calander.
The connection to Exchange 2010 is working if I input the users password, but should it not work without this popup too?
This connections name acording to Outlook is called: Exchange-Mail RPC/HTTP (remote [NTLM])
We use the same domain for external and internal autodiscover connections.
Test Exchange Connectivity Analyzer shows everything ok.
If i run
get-outlookanywhere | fl *external*
(2013 server)
ExternalHostname                   : webmail.domain.com
ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm
ExternalClientsRequireSsl          : True
(2010 server)
ExternalHostname                   : webmail.domain.com
ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Basic
ExternalClientsRequireSsl          : True
Only one thing I am wondering here is. If I change my old 2010 Auth Method to NTLM if that will break anything i OWA and so on.
What do you Guys have setup in your environments and can you point me towards any troubleshooting?
Thanks!

For us, the changes made in IIS are permanent, there quite possibly is a powershell way of doing it but I am still getting to grips with PS myself so I don't know.
I wont plagiarise others work but these two links here give a good explanation between Basic and NTLM. personally, I have always used basic because I always seem to get problems with NTLM, though one time it did work as expected but I forgot what I did to
get it working now.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/92178beb-3310-4363-8848-d022a6e2a77f/basic-vs-ntlm-authentication-outlook-anywhere
http://www.sysadminlab.net/exchange/outlook-anywhere-basic-vs-ntlm-authentication-explained

Exchange 2013/2010 Co-existance Outlook Users Always Prompted for Password

Hello,
We are in the process of attempting to migrate to Exchange 2013, but during the migration time, we need to coexist with the two versions. Our outlook clients are a mix of Office 2007, 2010, and 2013. When a user is migrated from 2010 to 2013,
they start getting prompted for their password in Outlook every few minutes. They can click cancel and continue working, but they continue to get prompts for their password. If they click the update folder button in outlook, it updates fine, and
the password prompt goes away for awhile.
Most topics on this state that this is caused by a certificate issue. We have an internally deployed CA, with the Root certificate trusted by all clients. The exchange 2013 server has a certificate that was created by this CA.
I believe that this is caused by OAB (address book) still being hosted on the Exchange 2010 server (with a self signed cert), that is causing the connection to fail. Is there anyway to test this without breaking outlook connections for the users that
are on Exchange 2010? Or is there any other reason that this would occur?
Thanks for any assistance.

Sorry for taking so long to reply, other items came up that rank higher then this migration.
I ran the Test-OutlookWebServices CMD and got this result:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32> Test-OutlookWebServices
Source                              ServiceEndpoint
Scenario                       Result Latency
(MS)
EXCHANGE13.company.local           exchange10.company.local           Autodiscover: Outlook Provider Failure     229
EXCHANGE13.company.local
Exchange Web Services          Skipped       0
EXCHANGE13.company.local
Availability Service           Skipped       0
EXCHANGE13.company.local
Offline Address Book           Skipped       0
I
am currently thinking that this may be the error. Is there a way to
change the first failing result to the hostname of the
exchange13.company.local without breaking the current settings for the
exchange10.company.local autodiscover?

Exchange 2013 - 2007 coexistence legacy namespace issues

Got an odd config here. Exchange 2007 CCR mode co-existing with split role 2013 servers over 2 Data Centers. Each DC has its own subnet so DAG has 2 IPs. New Certificate purchased with extra legacy namespace and loaded onto ISA and F5 as well as the
exchange servers.
I can send and receive from the Exchange 2013 servers. But I'm struggling to deploy the legacy namespace
Here's where it gets ugly. The client wants to continue (short term) to put legacy.company.com through ISA2006 servers and 2013 traffic through F5 load balancers. On the f5 side the path goes through a firewall then an f5 to the mailgateway
When we cut over to legacy (dns changes etc) OWA suffered intermittent Internal 500 errors. Active sync had to be pointed to webmail to work (we had it set blank as per Steve Goodmans recommendation) and Outlook Anywhere had no connectivity.
Urls were set correctly
Outlook Anywhere -> webmail.company.com
Autodiscover -> webmail.company.com
WebServices -> legacy.company.com
OWA -> legacy.company.com
OAB -> legacy.company.com
UM -> legacy.company.com
ActiveSync -> legacy.company.com
This is our 4th attempt to get this working. We can only work in the small hours so we are all fairly tired. Pointers anyone?

Hello,
Do you mean when the user access mailbox from internet, the load balancing will not occur? If so, I recommend you check your configuration as the following article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997148.aspx .
The user of ISA Server load balancing will eliminates the need for setting up the load balancing cluster on the exchange server CAS side.
If I have any misunderstanding, please free let me know.
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence DAG functionality?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for