Exchange 2013 / 2010 coexistence with different public domains

Currently in my organization
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Client Access / Hub Transport
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Unified Messaging Server (we also have Lync 2013 in the environment)
1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Mailbox
In my organization, we have approximately 600 mailboxes - 100 office staff, and 500 field employees using a mixture of Outlook 2007/2010/2013 and various mobile devices. Most of our field employees are in remote locations, several hundred
miles away. We have no IT staff in any of our field locations.
We also have two public domains that we use, though we are trying to phase out the old one to unify everything.
domain-old.com - Used when the company had a different name. All Exchange services are published with this one.
domain-new.com - Used after the company changed names. The goal is to publish all Exchange services with this one.
domain.local - Our internal Active Directory domain.
We use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for all inbound/outbound email. We publish OWA, ActiveSync, etc. through our Sophos firewall. Also, we have two KEMP LoadMaster appliances that for high availability that we currently use for Lync 2013; they are
severely underutilized.
Goals for the Exchange migration
My primary goal is to introduce high availability into our environment by introducing redundancy on multiple levels. I would like to accomplish this by utilizing Exchange 2013 since we will need to purchase additional licensing anyway. My idea of the
final topology is:
2x KEMP LoadMaster appliances providing reverse proxy and load balancing to the CAS servers
2x Physical servers running Hyper-V, separated physically but in the same AD site. Each one would run:
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Standard w/SP1 - Client Access
1x VM with Exchange 2013 Enterprise w/SP1 - Mailbox - Utilizing DAGs for high-availability
I'd like all the new Exchange services to be published under the domain-new.com domain - such as mail.domain-new.com, mail.domain-new.com/owa, smtp.domain-new.com, etc.
We have purchased two new physical servers that will be Hyper-V hosts running Server 2012R2. My timeframe to start this project is within the next two weeks, so I'll be running the new Exchange 2013 VMs under Server 2012, not R2 as it won't be supported
until Exchange 2013 SP3 is released.
Deployment Plan
Install Exchange 2013 on new VMs.
Create CAS Array object.
Configure Exchange 2013 to publish under the new namespace.
Perform mailbox moves to 2013 for a small group (1-5 users) at a time. Recreate Outlook profiles and mobile device profiles for that group. Test and move to the next group.
Once all users are moved to the new namespace, decommission the Exchange 2010 servers.
Unknowns
My primary unknown is about the namespaces. All of the guides I have read strictly deal with keeping the existing namespace and having the Exchange 2013 CAS proxy requests to Exchange 2010 for mailboxes still on 2010. This should never be an issue for us
since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move.
My question boils down to, is this a supported way to migrate to Exchange 2013? And if so, are there some materials or information to help me perform it this way?

Hi,
From the description, you want to install Exchange 2013 in another domain and then migrate from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013. 
About DAG, all servers in a DAG must be running the same operating system. If there is only one mailbox server, there is no need to deploy DAG.
About CAS array, we should know that the CAS Array no longer exists in Exchange 2013.
About the namespace, based on my knowledge, we can introduce a new namespace. Just as what you said "This should never be an issue for us since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move".
Here are some articles about how to upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 in the same organization.
Checklist: Upgrade from Exchange 2010
Install Exchange 2013 in an Existing Exchange 2010 Organization
Upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Exchange 2013 EAC coexistence with Exchange 2007

    Dear All,
    I have an exchange organization comprized of single Exchange 2007 SP3 UR 15 running on Win2008 SP2 and two recently installed Exchange 2013 SP1 CU7 with CAS and Mailbox role running on Win 2012 R2.
    Imidiantly after Exchange 2013 install, I am not able to login to Exchange 2013 EAC. When I enter my credentials domain\username, the EAC page simpli dose a quick refresh and I am back where I started.
    I have tryid mutiple UTLs to access EAC page, such as:
    https://localhost/ecp?ExchClientVer=15
    https://localhost/ecp?ExchClientVer=14
    https://localhost/ecp
    Each of them show the same result, a page gets refreshet. I have tryid to move my Exchange Organization user mailbox to Exchange 2013 to see if that helps but the result.
    I also noticed that OWA dosent work for mailboxes that are on Exchange 2013, they are redirected to Exchange 2007 even thou they are on Exchange 2013.
    Any idea on this one?
    Thank you
    b.

    Hi,
    From your description, I would like to verify if you have configured Exchange 2013 namespace and virtual directories (such as OWA, ECP, OAB, Web Services, AutoDiscover)correctly. Please make sure these virtual directories are configured correctly and check
    the result.
    For more information about Exchange 2007  migration to Exchange 2013, here is a helpful blog for your reference.
    Step-by-Step Exchange 2007 to 2013 Migration
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2013/07/25/part-2-step-by-step-exchange-2007-to-2013-migration.aspx
    Hope this can be helpful to you.
    Best regards,
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2013 Sp1 Coexistence with Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5 HTTP 500

    I`m trying to make working OWA coexistence between Exchange 2013 SP1 and Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5.
    When user login in to OWA where his mailbox is located  on Exchange 2013 server it logon successful and owa opened. When i try to login to the same url with user whose mailbox is located on Exchange 2010 server  i get Error http 50
    The website cannot display the page :   HTTP 500   »https://URLEXCHANGE2013/owa/auth.owa«
    The same is, when i use https:// URLEXCHANGE2013/ecp?ExchClientVer=14
    URL on Exchange 2013 are different  as fro Exchange 2010.
    I even tried to setup Internal URL for Exchange 2010 to bi set to »null ,Saem error
    Exchange server 2013 Sp1 is installed on Windows server 2012 R2.

    Assumption  is correct. I have even  enable verbose logging, and i can see MSExchange Front End HTTP Proxy , that successfully connect to Exchange 2010 server.
    But remember Exchange 2013 is fresh installation on  Windows server 2012 R2.
    IIS LOG
    2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0&cafeReqId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0;
    443 companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 200 0 0 5484
    2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4&cafeReqId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4;
    443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401&cafeReqId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401;
    443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 15
    2014-03-04 08:52:55 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=551cfdd9-18ac-42d8-aea3-cbb546c9d9fb; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/
    302 0 0 9937
    2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c1b97df9-ec56-4906-b2f5-965551b720ae; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
    https://OWA.company.com/ 200 0 0 1015
    2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b92ca682-04f4-4d4f-931e-9a95680ab9ea; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
    - 200 0 0 671
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=093bd01a-de59-4519-80f6-067484122091; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c2f7565d-ee6a-48f8-8d86-16d5d3ca65c1; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 200 0 0 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=ba633030-2376-4bad-a32f-8f160bd87bd4; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=5e94172c-d97c-46a9-a602-6030d6f7da2c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 200 0 0 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9ba2caf3-2a03-44a2-8477-2724689e139c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 200 0 0 46
    2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/15.0.847/scripts/premium/flogon.js &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=62bb4655-3bfa-4e07-aa62-27c93e7e8b4d; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 200 0 0 0
    2014-03-04 08:52:59 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9d52ec1a-2ee1-4954-85e6-89e7e5df407a; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 302 0 0 812
    2014-03-04 08:52:59 ::1 GET /OWA/Calendar/[email protected]/calendar/calendar.html &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=4ea66475-9a47-41a4-81cb-6b569715d0d6; 443 - ::1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 200 0 0 8859
    2014-03-04 08:53:01 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b3db7480-2192-436c-b01d-29d0e528cfec; 443 UseronEX2010 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/owa/auth/logon.aspx?replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f
    500 0 0 187
    2014-03-04 08:53:04 127.0.0.1 GET /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/default.eas &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=2e2a655b-00b9-42ae-8789-1e452e6579c3; 443 [email protected] 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess
    - 200 0 0 8265
    2014-03-04 08:53:14 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8741886f-b9b1-46f9-8c15-baf35809a12c; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
    - 200 0 0 15265
    2014-03-04 08:53:14 127.0.0.1 GET /OWA/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8ad938fb-f2c3-42bf-8718-da62b122422c; 443 - 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 302 0 0 15
    HTTPERR  LOG :
    2014-03-04 08:51:48 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:51:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:52:25 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:52:25 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:52:30 127.0.0.1 14122 127.0.0.1 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /RPC/[email protected] 404 - NotFound -
    2014-03-04 08:52:30 ::1%0 14121 ::1%0 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /ecp/ReportingWebService/ 404 - NotFound -
    2014-03-04 08:54:42 ::1%0 14117 ::1%0 444 - - - - - Timer_ConnectionIdle -
    2014-03-04 08:54:48 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:54:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:55:35 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    2014-03-04 08:55:35 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
    Trace login, ok it is xml,  so print is..
    -Request Summary  
    Site

    Process
    8232 
    Failure Reason
    STATUS_CODE 
    Trigger Status
    500 
    Final Status
    500 
    Time Taken
    500 msec 
    Url
    http://EXCH2013.companyNT.local:80/powershell?clientApplication=ActiveMonitor;PSVersion=4.0&sessionID=Version_15.0_(Build_846.0)=rJqNiZqNgZuQkpqT0pqH0ZuQkpqTkYvRk5CcnpOBzsbLzsbGyczJyIHPzNDPy9DNz87L38/Gxc/KxcrJ 
    App Pool
    MSExchangePowerShellFrontEndAppPool 
    Authentication
    Kerberos 
    User from token
    companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb 
    Activity ID
    {8000134C-0001-E300-B63F-84710C7967BB} 
    -Errors & Warnings  
    No.↓ 
    Severity  
    Event  
    Module Name  
    157. view trace 
    Warning 
    -MODULE_SET_RESPONSE_ERROR_STATUS 
    ModuleName
    ManagedPipelineHandler 
    Notification
    EXECUTE_REQUEST_HANDLER 
    HttpStatus
    500 
    HttpReason
    Request Failed 
    HttpSubStatus

    ErrorCode
    The operation completed successfully.
     (0x0) 
    ConfigExceptionInfo
     ManagedPipelineHandler 
     See all events for the request 

  • Exchange 2013 in coexistence with 2010, Outlook keep looking for Exchange 2010 server slow connection

    All,
    not sure if this topic has already answered, but can't find anything around.
    Here's the scenario. Migrating from a single Exchange 2010 to a cluster of 2 + 1 Exchange 2013. Two in a site, One in the other site (DC).
    I have migrated successfully a firsat batch of users. Mail flow works perfectly. The only thing is that often the migrated users are experiencing a long time (about 30 minutes) to get their Outlook syncronized. Both OL 2010 and 2013 doesn't make any difference.
    They're using OL Anywhere, and I've already tried to rebuild the profile.
    From a check on the OL connection status, looks like they're still looking for something on EX2010, but no idea what could be. If I disable the cache mode it works smooth and quick.
    My best guess is that is something in cache they're trying to keep updated... but still this doesn't explain the huge delay.
    Any help would be highly appreciated!
    Thanks!

    Hi Alessandro,
    What happens in OWA? I guess it should be good.
    Did you have public folders with Exchange 2010? Were they moved over to Exch 2013? Technically you should move the PF to the latest version from the legacy version before moving over the users?
    - Moved the PF to OL2013. same behaviour
    May be the outlook clients are looking for th OAB? Did you move the OAB to Exchange 2013?
    - Did this too.
    Try running outlook on safe mode and see what happens? may be one of the outlook add-in's are looking for something on Exchange 2010?
    - Will try that....
    Can you do a Test Email Auto Configuration in outlook (Hold CNTRL key and right click on outlook icon on status bar) and see if the exchange url's are pointed to Exch 2013?
    - Will try that....
    Is this happening to all migrated users or specific? Are they BlackBerry users?
    - All users and there are no BB users
    Do you have any archived emails on those migrated users? May be outlook is looking for some archived stuff on the Exch 2010 side?
    - I instructed Exchange to migrate also the archiving database, however There are no archived mailbox on 2010
    Could this be because of any calendar entries? May be migrated user mailboxes are having issues with working with non-migrated mailbox calendars?
    - This maybe a possibility. I have only 10 users actively using Exchange, while all others have the mailboxes only because they've Lync. I've completed all migrations today, so there shouldn't be anything left on 2010
    Let me know how it went - all the best!
    Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question. Regards, Siva

  • Exchange 2013/2010 coexistence DAG functionality?

    Hi, so this is a bit of a silly question. But I need to make sure I understood the situation correctly.
    I currently have an Exchange 2010 DAG with 2 servers and I am mid way through (In the Exchange Server Deployment Assistant) introducing my first Exchange 2013 server.
    The plan is to make the new 2013 server the active DAG member one of the old 2010 servers the passive member for a short term until that 2010 server is rebuilt to 2013, but that's not going to work is it? Once I migrate a 2010 user to a 2013 database, that
    user only exists in 2013, right?
    Theres no way of adding a 2013 database into a 2010 DAG, so that if the 2013 server is down, the 2010 server will become active?
    Thanks

    No, there is not.  You will build a new Exchange 2013 DAG and move mailboxes from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 mailbox databases.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2013 / 2010 / 2007 - Public Folders

    I have read that legacy public folders and 2013 public folders canot co-exist.
    If I have legacy public folders A, B and C, does this mean...
     that if I migrate folder A to 2013, i cannot maintain a replica on legacy systems, but folders B and C are still accessible
    ..or..
     If I migrate folder A to 2013, I must migrate folders B and C also.
    If I am need to import folder D, from an external Exchange 2013 installation, into my legacy public folder system, is it possible to migrate folder D out of the external 2130 environment into my legacy public folder environment? If so, is there any extra functionality
    2013 PF has that the users will lose if the folders are down graded to legacy?
    Thanks!
    Tom

    Hi,
    User mailboxes on Exchange 2013 servers can connect to legacy public folders, but legacy Exchange mailboxes are unable to access the public folder hierarchy on Exchange 2013 server.
    Exchange 2013 public folders and legacy public folders can’t exist in your Exchange organization simultaneously.
    Before you migrate public folders, you need to migrate mailboxes to Exchange 2013 first.
    Please refer to the following article.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj150538(v=exchg.150).aspx
    Besides, here is a related thread for your reference.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/7603f02e-beb4-4c3d-8cb9-613ad806766b/public-folder-migration-from-multiple-exchange-2007-to-exchange-2013?forum=exchangesvrsharingcollab
    Best regards,
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • RPC over HTTP trouble Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence, 2013 RPCProxy cannot ping GC.

    I currently have an Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence scenario which gives me trouble with the RPC over HTTP part with users with a 2007 mailbox. the MS RCA website performs 2 tests with the MAPI address book endpoints, once against a 2007 mailbox server and
    once a against a GC/DC, the last one fails. The logs are from our test domain, but the exact same happens in the production domain. running CU8 (recently upgraded, but problem was exactly the same with CU7)
    Testing the MAPI Address Book endpoint on the Exchange server.
    The address book endpoint was tested successfully.
    Additional Details
    Elapsed Time: 7872 ms.
    Test Steps
    Attempting to ping the MAPI Address Book endpoint with identity: exmb11.domain.test:6004.
    The endpoint was pinged successfully.
    Additional Details
    The endpoint responded in 156 ms.
    Elapsed Time: 4153 ms.
    Testing the MAPI Address Book endpoint on the Exchange server.
    An error occurred while testing the address book endpoint.
    Additional Details
    Elapsed Time: 3079 ms.
    Test Steps
    Attempting to ping the MAPI Address Book endpoint with identity: tdc01421.domain.test:6004.
    The attempt to ping the endpoint failed.
     <label for="testSelectWizard_ctl12_ctl06_ctl02_ctl09_ctl00_tmmArrow">Tell
    me more about this issue and how to resolve it</label>
    Additional Details
    The RPC_S_SERVER_UNAVAILABLE error (0x6ba) was thrown by the RPC Runtime process.
    Elapsed Time: 3079 ms.
    texmb11 = ex2007 mailbox
    texfr11 = ex2007 CAS
    tdc01421 = DC/GC
    texch31 = 2013 multirole
    other symptoms :
    Browser test
    https://texch31.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?texmb11:6004
    --> 503 (which is correct)
    https://texch31.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?tdc01421:6004
    --> 404.0 Not Found
    RPCPing
    rpcping -t ncacn_http -s texmb11 -o RpcProxy=texch31.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
    Success
    rpcping -t ncacn_http -s tdc01421 -o RpcProxy=texch31.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
    Fails!
    so the Ex2013 RPCProxy doesn't proxy to the DC/GC, but the RPCProxy to an ex2007 mailbox server works fine, so the authentication methods configured are correct i'd say..
    the same tests using the ex2007CAS server as RPC proxy all succeed!:
    MS RCA is all green
    https://texfr11.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?texmb11:6004 
    --> 503
    https://texfr11.domain.test/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?tdc01421:6004 
    --> 503 
    rpcping -t ncacn_http -s texmb11 -o RpcProxy=texfr11.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
    Success
    rpcping -t ncacn_http -s tdc01421 -o RpcProxy=texfr11.domain.test -P "user,dom,*" -I "user,dom,*" -H 2 -u 9 -a connect -F 3 -v 3 -e 6004
    Success!!
    Logs
    all tries against the 2013 CAS server generate '404' log entries in several logs int the Logging directory, the most explicit being the one in Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Logging\HttpProxy\RpcHttp : HttpProxy_xxxxxx.LOG
    2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z,895cdf07-f2eb-4beb-b787-da02ba11b0c2,15,0,1076,0,,RpcHttp,webmail.domain.test,/rpc/rpcproxy.dll,,Basic,true,DOM\user,,,MSRPC,10.10.142.132,TEXCH31,404,,MailboxGuidWithDomainNotFound,RPC_IN_DATA,,,,,,,,,4,,,,1,,,0,,0,,0,0,,0,2,0,,,,,,,,,1,1,0,,1,,2,2,,?TDC01422.domain.test:6004,,BeginRequest=2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z;CorrelationID=<empty>;ProxyState-Run=None;ProxyState-Complete=CalculateBackEnd;EndRequest=2015-04-30T19:58:00.153Z;,HttpProxyException=Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.HttpProxyException:
    RPC server name passed in by client could not be resolved: TDC01422.domain.test    at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.RpcHttpProxyRequestHandler.ResolveToDefaultAnchorMailbox(String originalRpcServerName  String reason)    at
    Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.RpcHttpProxyRequestHandler.ResolveAnchorMailbox()    at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.ProxyRequestHandler.InternalBeginCalculateTargetBackEnd(AnchorMailbox& anchorMailbox)    at Microsoft.Exchange.HttpProxy.ProxyRequestHandler.<BeginCalculateTargetBackEnd>b__3b();
    the error suggests the name could not be resolved. but nslookup works fine. i can ping the tdc01421 correctly form texch31, it returns me the ipv4 address. i can telnet to port 6004 from texch31 server to tdc01421 giving me the correct 'ncacn_http' answer..
    i look at the 'ValidPorts' and ValidPorts_Autoconfig_Exchange reg keys and filled them with the same i have on the 2007cas servers (all ex servers, all dc/gc's, all of them with netbios & fqdn ports 6001,6002 & 6004..) but also no success.
    im out of ideas by now..

    Hello togehter, 
    if anyone is using the Interim Update (Hotfix) "Exchange2013-KB2997209_2997847-x64-en.msp" please be aware of the following bug in this hotfix: 
    NOTE: Another issue that we have seen only from some E2013 On-Premises customers who installed
    fixes for any of the above E2013 CU6 related issues is that “Using OWA, users cannot create new messages or reply to existing messages” – These are mostly installer issues where OWA files are not copying correctly in the new version directory. Ideally the
    content of these two folders, i.e. “V15\ClientAccess\Owa\prem\15.0.995.31” and “V15\ClientAccess\Owa\prem\15.0.995.29” should be identical, now if for any reason, they are not then it can break the OWA experience like described above. Take these steps if you
    run into related issues:
    -Backup the contents of “15.0.995.31” folder to a different folder/directory
    -Copy the files and folders from “15.0.995.29” to “15.0.995.31” folder – this should fix the issue …
    Best, 
    Martin

  • Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence: The Name on the Security Certificate is Invalid or Does Not Match the Name of the Site.

    In the midst of Exchange 2013/2007 coexistence configuration. 
    Currently:
    Exchange 2007:
    2 CAS\HUB
    1 Mailbox server
    Exchange 2013 (2 sites):
    LA:
    1 CAS
    2 MBX servers
    MKE:
    1 CAS 
    2 MBX servers.
    We purchased a certificate from Digicert and added every SAN name we could think of including "legacy.companyname.com", just to be sure. Added certificate to Exchange 2013 CAS servers and 2007 CAS\HUB boxes. Configured virtual directories on Exchange
    2013 MKE-CAS01 but not on Exchange 2013 LA-CAS01. Configured virtual directories to on Exchange 2007 CAS\HUB to point to "legacy.companyname.com". 
    Mailboxes have not been moved yet. I just wanted to get the coexistence between Exchange 2013/2007 up first but some users (not all) receiving
    "The name of the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site" for
    "LEGACY.COMPANYNAME.COM". I remember configuring the AUTODISCOVER virtual directory for Exchange 2007. Any ideas? Thank you.

    Hi,
    Please make sure that the certificate with "legacy.companyname.com" name is enabled for IIS service. We can check it by running the following command in Exchange server 2007:
    Get-ExchangeCertificate | FL
    Thanks,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2013/2010 - Co-Existence, URLs.

    Hey Team,
    I am sure this is well documented and i for some reason cant seem to get good solid answer. But here is my questions. what are the correct URL settings for (OWA, ActiveSync, EWS) etc for Exchange 2013/2010 in a coexistence scenario?
    1) All servers in the same ad site
    2) mail. autodiscover, pointed to the 2013 server
    3) 2013 server is internet connected.
    Am i supposed to clear all the 2010 URLs?, Just the external ones? Use a separate namespace?
    Thanks,
    Robert
    Robert

    This is well documented in the below post, I would recommend you check it:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/03/12/client-connectivity-in-an-exchange-2013-coexistence-environment.aspx
    In Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence scenario, CAS 2013 will proxy all connections to Exchange 2010.
    How CAS2013 Picks a Target Legacy Exchange Server
    It’s important to understand that when CAS2013 proxies to a legacy Exchange Client Access server, it constructs a URL based on the server FQDN, not a load balanced namespace or the InternalURL value.
    When a CAS2013 starts up, it connects to Active Directory and enumerates a topology map to understand all the Client Access servers that exist within the environment. Every 50 seconds, CAS2013 will send a lightweight request to each
    protocol end point to all the Client Access servers in the topology map; these requests have a user agent string of HttpProxy.ClientAccessServer2010Ping
    Mohammad Saeed Abdelaziz | MCSE 2003 | MCTS: Lync, OCS, Exchange2007 | CCNP | UC Voice Specialist http://lyncrocks.wordpress.com/

  • Exchange 2013 users cant connect to public folders on Exchange 2010

    Hi
    I recently migrated all users from exchange 2010 to 2013 and now nobody can connect to public folders. 
    Ive read several forums with similar issue, but none of the solutions have fixed my problem.
    My configuration on exchange 2013:
    ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm
    InternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm
    IISAuthenticationMethods           : {Basic, Ntlm, Negotiate}
    ive also removed negotiation from the rpc site on the IIS.
    Is there something else im missing?
    Thanks
    /Carlos

    Are you getting any error message when accessing the Public Folder?
    Cheers,
    Gulab Prasad
    Technology Consultant
    Blog:
    http://www.exchangeranger.com    Twitter:
      LinkedIn:
       Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Creation of a second Exchange 2013 server on a different site (with the roles of MBX and CAS) fails on prepare active directory and prepare schema.

    Hello everyone
    I have a network infrastructure  consisting of 3 sites, site A, site B, and site C. i have 2 domain controllers on every site, and the AD roles are on the primary domain controller on site A. On site A I have an Exchange 2013sp1 CU6.
    I want to create a second Exchange on Site B, with the roles of mailbox (the exchange on Site A will be first DAG member and the Exchange on Site B will be the second member of the DAG) and CAS.
    First question: Is my  thought correct about installaing on the same server mailbox and CAS server?
    Second question: how many DAG witnesses I need for the DAG? One per site, or one in general (for example located on site A)
    Third question: When I am trying to perform “Setup.exe /PrepareSchema /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms”  I receive the error
    “ Setup encountered a problem while validating the state of Active Directory:
     The Active Directory schema version (15303) is higher than Setup's version (15292). Therefore, PrepareSchema can't be executed.  See the Exchange setup log for more information on this error. For more information, visit:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx “
    I tried  to run the PrepareSchema from  the ISO of Exchange 2013 SP1 and form the extracted content of Exchange 2013SP1 CU6 archive, but still receive the same error. Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thank you for your answer,
    I have tried to run "Setup.exe /PrepareSchema /IAcceptExchangeServerLicenseTerms”  from
    Exchange 2013 CU6 media, but I still receive  the error:
    The Active Directory schema version (15303) is higher than Setup's version (15292). Therefore, PrepareSchema
    can't be executed.  See the Exchange setup log for more information on this error. For more information, visit:http://technet.microsoft.com/library(EXCHG.150)/ms.exch.setupreadiness.AdInitErrorRule.aspx “
    any ideas?

  • Exchange 2013 co-existence with Exchange 2010 proxying issue.

    Hello,  
    I am testing Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2013 co-existence in my test lab at the moment, with
    a view to migrating our production environment to 2013 later in the year.  
    The lab is setup, and the problem I'm having is that internal Outlook clients cannot open
    their respective mailboxes once the 2013 CAS server is introduced into the mix.  
     The
    setup is listed below:  
    EXCHANGE 2010 Servers  
    TESTLABEXCH01 - CAS,HT,MBX - Exchange 2010 SP3  
    TESTLABEXCH02 - CAS,HT,MBX - Exchange 2010 SP3  
    Both servers are part of a CAS Array - casarray01.testlab.local  
    Both servers are part of a DAG - DAG01.testlab.local  
    RpcClientAccessServer on all 2010 databases set to casarray01.testlab.local  
    The A record for casarray01.testlab.local points to the IP of the VIP of a load balancer.  
    The loadbalancer serves
    the following ports: 25,80,443,143,993,110,995,135,60200,60201  
    OutlookAnywhere is enabled on both servers:  
    ClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm  
    IISAuthenticationMethods   : {Basic, Ntlm}  
    Internal and external mail flow works without issue before the 2013 server is introduced. 
    Internal and external client access works without issue before the 2013 server is introduced. 
    Part Two to follow.....
    Matt

    EXCHANGE 2013 Servers :
    TESTLABEXCH03 - CAS,MBX - Exchange 2013 SP1  
    OutlookAnywhere is enabled on the server:  
    ClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm  
    IISAuthenticationMethods   : {Basic, Ntlm}  
    RpcClientAccessServer on all 2013 databases set to casarray01.testlab.local
    (This an inherited setting I assume from the pre-existing 2010 organization)  
    Split DNS is in place and all internal/external URL's point to either:  
    autidiscover.external.com  
    mail.external.com  
    The A record for the mail.external.com points to the IP of the load balancer VIP  
    The CNAME record for autodiscover.external.com points to mail.external.com  
    When the TESTLABEXCH03 is added to the load balancer config,
    and given highest priority this is when the Outlook clients stop working.  
    Any existing profiles in Outlook 2010/Outlook 2013 can no be opened as there is a persistent
    credentials prompt.  
    Upon trying to create a new profile, the process errors when reaching the "Log onto server"
    stage and again prompts for credentials.  
    Running the test-outlookconnectivity cmdlet from
    either of the 2010 servers produces the following results.  
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol:http  
    ClientAccessServer   ServiceEndpoint                         
    Scenario                            Result  Latency  
    TESTLABEXCH02  autodiscover.external.com    Autodiscover:
    Web service request.  Success  343.20  
    TESTLABEXCH02  casarray01.testlab.local       RpcProxy::VerifyRpcProxy.  
    Success    0.00  
    TESTLABEXCH02  casarray01.testlab.local         RFRI::GetReferral.                 
    Failure   -1.00  
    TESTLABEXCH02  casarray01.testlab.local        NSPI::GetProfileDetails.           
    Failure   -1.00  
    TESTLABEXCH02  casarray01.testlab.local        
    Mailbox::Connect.                   Failure   -1.00 
    TESTLABEXCH02  casarray01.testlab.local        
    Mailbox::Logon.                     Skipped   -1.00  
    If remove the 2013 CAS server from the loadbalancer config and
    all connections go directly to the 2010 servers again, all of the above tests pass and Outlook connectivity is also restored.  
    IIS has been reset on all 3 servers incidentally, following any changes made whilst troubleshooting. 
    I'm struggling to see what I'm missing here, if anyone can assist in troubleshooting this
    matter further, or point out any errors in my setup it would be greatly appreciated.  
    Regards  
    Matt 
    Matt

  • Exchange 2013 DNS for internal and external domain

    Hi All,
    I have been assigned a task to implement Microsoft Exchange Server 2013. I need some help in setting up DNS namespaces and design a strategy to have same internal and external names. Let me share some details here.
    We have an Active Directory domain myinternaldomain.net, and we have a public domain
    mypublicdomain.com and we have setup email policy to have
    mypublicdomain.com as the SMTP domain for all the users. We have created another DNS zone in Active directory integrated DNS and created a records for
    mail.mypublicdomain.com and autodiscover.mypublicdomain.com which will point to CAS NLB IP. We have 2 CAS servers and 2 MBX servers, we have configured DAG for MBX High availability and planning to implement WNLB for CAS as
    hardware LB is out of scope due to budget constrains.
    We want to have same URLs for OWA, Autodiscover, ECP and other services from internal network as well as from public network. Users should not be bothered to remember two URLs, using one from internal and other from public networks. I also want to confirm
    that with this setup in place do i need to have myinternaldomain.net and server names in SAN certificate?
    Thanks

    Hi Sccmnb,
    You can easily achieve this using split DNS.
    Internal DNS hostname "mail.mypublicdomain.com" will be pointing to your internal CAS NLB IP and the external public DNS hostname"mail.mypublicdomain.com" will be pointing to the Network device or
    Reverse proxy server IP.
    Depending upon users access location(internal\external) the IPs would vary and they should be able to access the website with same name.
    The names that you would require on the certificate(Use EAC or powershell to raise the request) for client connectivity would be
    SN= mail.mypublicdomain.com
    SAN= autodiscover.mypublicdomain.com
    You don't need to have the active directory domain name present in the certificate.
    Additional  to this you need to update the AutodiscoverURI for all servers and OWA,ECP,Autodiscover Virtual Directories InternalURL and ExternalURL fields with appropiate public names.
    Some additional Info:
    *Internal vs. External Namespaces
    Since the release of Exchange 2007, the recommendation is to deploy a split-brain DNS infrastructure for the Internet-based client namespaces. A split-brain DNS infrastructure enables different IP addresses to be returned for a given namespace
    based on where the client resides – if the client is within the internal network, the IP address of the internal load balancer is returned; if the client is external, the IP address of the external gateway/firewall is returned.
    This approach simplifies the end-user experience – users only have to know a single namespace (e.g., mail.contoso.com) to access their data, regardless of where they are connecting. A split-brain DNS infrastructure, also simplifies the configuration of Client
    Access server virtual directories, as the InternalURL and ExternalURL values within the environment can be the same value.
    *Managing Certificates in Exchange Server 2013 (Part 2)
    *Nice step by step article
    Designing a simple namespace for Exchange 2013
    Regards,
    Satyajit
    Please“Vote As Helpful”
    if you find my contribution useful or “MarkAs Answer” if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Exchange 2013 prevent spam from my own domain

    Dear All,
    Back in Exchange 2007 we used to prevent spam from own domain by modifying permissions on the Receive Connector, as show on this link.
    http://exchangepedia.com/2008/09/how-to-prevent-annoying-spam-from-your-own-domain.html
    When I modify the same permissions on Exchange 2013 Default Front Receive Connector, the spam is still allowed threw.
    Is there a different aproche to achieve the same result in Exchange 2013?
    Thank you
    Bujar

    Hi Bujar,
    Have you tried to modify the permissions on Exchange 2013 default Hub transport Receive connector?
    As we know, for Exchange 2013, there have been major architectural changes to the Exchange server roles. Instead of the five server roles that were present in Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2007, in Exchange 2013, the number of server roles has been reduced
    to three: the Client Access server and the Mailbox server, and with Service Pack 1, the Edge Transport server role.
    The Exchange 2013 Mailbox server includes all many of the server components found in Exchange 2010: client access protocols, transport services, mailbox databases, and Unified Messaging services (the Client Access server redirects SIP traffic generated from
    incoming calls to the Mailbox server). The Client Access server is a thin and stateless server that doesn’t do any data rendering. There’s never anything queued or stored on the Client Access server.
    So, I recommend you try to modify the permissions on default hub transport receive connector, it may achieve your requirement .
    Best regards,
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2013 / 2010 co-existence - Outlook won't connect to Exchange 2010 mailboxes

    Greetings!  I have a lab set up at home where I have been testing co-existence of Exchange 2013 and 2010 for a future corporate upgrade project.
    I am running into some odd behavior.  Any mailbox that has been migrated to Exchange 2013 works just fine, however, when I try to set up Outlook for a mailbox still on Exchange 2010 I  receive errors.  OWA works just fine for these Exchange
    2010 mailboxes, it is just Outlook that has the problem.  This is what I am running into:
    1. Outlook uses autodiscover to locate server settings.  It fails at the 'logging on to mail server' step saying that Exchange isn't available; Outlook must be connected, etc.
    2. It then gives me the settings box for Exchange server and Mailbox.  This is auto populated with one of the Exchange 2013 servers (there are 3 of them, all have both MBX and CAS role).  If I then change the server to the Exchange 2010 CAS server,
    and hit 'check names', it underlines the very same entries (like it found them this time) that were there initially and goes on to finish the configuration.
    3. When I launch Outlook with this Exchange 2010 user, it fails to open with the error message that the set of folders couldn't be opened.
    I've been doing as much research on this as I can.  I've tried disabling IPv6 to no avail.  It seems as if perhaps the issue is with Exchange 2013 proxying the request back to the Exchange 2010 servers but I am not sure what to check in that regards. 
    Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    Don´t disable IPV6 on an Exchange Server, it is, in my opinion not necessary - also applies for AD.
    You can use your original SSL Cert for your new Ex 2013 environment.
    In dns you want two host A records: mail.domain.com and autodiscover.domain.com
    On your 2013 set your internal and external virtual directories to mail.domain.com
    leave autodiscover and Powershell alone.
    Also set the autodiscover URI to your Certificate name ie. mail.domain.com
    Set-ClientAccessServer -Identity "YourCASServer" -AutoDiscoverServiceInternalUri "https://mail.domain.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml"
    Thanks.  I wanted to give some additional info before I run any commands.  I currently have an A record for autodiscover and it is pointed to the Exchange 2013 DAG/cluster IP.  I have a 3 entries for mail.domain, for DNS round robin; basically
    it is listed 3 times for the IP of each of my Exchange 2013 servers.  Does any of this sound problematic?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Tree Component and as3

    Hello .. my problem is tree component and AS3 , before we hade such easy time with tree component in as2 but now i founded that we cant talk directly to tree component and we have to use API and XML , well i never liked XML and before i worked with t

  • XML PO in MM-SRV-SUS scenario

    Hi experts, We are running on ECC 7 EhP 4. We are implementing MM-SUS services procurement scenario. In ECC, I need to configure PO output in XML format. I activated the event linkage for BUS2012 (PO) events Created and changed. I understand that I n

  • Creating virtual directory with OC4J

    Hello, all. I thought this issue was going to be straight-forward, but after searching this forum and the General one I am not so sure. Can someone tell me how to create virtual directory mappings or contexts for 10gAS so that jsps that reside in an

  • IOS 7 - no carddav Contacts

    I have some carddav contacts groups on my iphone. But CardDAV works no longer for me, since I upgraded to iOS7. If I set the iOS 7 incorrectly set URL correctly, I can add in iOS 7 a contacts account without error messages. But I cannot use the added

  • I accidentally threw away the box with my serial number before registering the product. I am new to adobe so I didn't realize I would need it. Is there a way to track down my number?

    I accidentally threw away the box with my serial number before registering the product. I am new to adobe so I didn't realize I would need it. Is there a way to track down my number?