Exchange 2013 and 2007 coexistence and redirects
Hi all,
I'm settings up the coexistence but i've got a problem.
I've got 3 sites:
Site A: Exchange 2013 cas and mailbox
Site B: Exchange 2007 hub/cas and mailbox
Site C: Exchange 2007 hub/cas and mailbox
The problem is the owa and active sync redirect. I can open a mailbox located in site B where the legacy.domain.com dns record points, but i cannot open a mailbox from the exchange 2013 nor 2007 owa from site B to C.
I configured only the internal url leaving the external one blank.
How do i redirect all the requests to a mailbox located in site C from site A and B?
Thanks,
D.
You need to have External URL too, so that redirection can take place.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mbaher/archive/2009/12/17/exchange-2010-proxy-or-redirect.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310763(v=exchg.141).aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/01/25/exchange-2013-client-access-server-role.aspx
Cheers,
Gulab Prasad
Technology Consultant
Blog:
http://www.exchangeranger.com Twitter:
LinkedIn:
Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.
Similar Messages
-
Exchange 2013 and 2007 - Coexistence and ActiveSync
Good morning all,
We're currently in the process of migrating our Exchange server from 2007 to 2013, and am experiencing a few problems. At the moment, OWA redirection works fine, but ActiveSync does not. At the moment the 2013 Server isn't public facing, it's internal until
all testing is complete. However despite being on the LAN, when an iPhone is configured to target the 2013 server, it isn't proxying to the 2007 CAS, but instead provides a vague error of being Unable to Verify account information. No mail is retrieved.
Has there been a step I've missed to allow this to work seamlessly?Generally, both the internal and external Exchange 2007 ActiveSync URL should be pointing to the legacy namespace - legacy.yourdomain.com. If you've set correctly the internal name resolution (resolving the legacy namespace to the internal Exchange 2007
IP address), ActiveSync should be working fine.
Have you tried Android phones as well?
Alternatively, you can set the Exchange 2007 ActiveSync External and Internal URL to $NULL, forcing Exchange 2013 CAS to proxy all requests to the Exchange 2007 CAS. This way devices are not affected by a redirect. -
Migration Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 with CAS Array and DAG
Dear All,
I am starting the migration of Exchange 2010 2 servers (CAS/Mailbox) with DAG no CAS Array to Exchange 2013 with 2 servers CAS array and 2 Mailbox servers with DAG. I read on some blogs that no requirement of CAS array on Exchange 2013. My concern how to
configure NLB on CAS servers for the client to connect.
Please guide and have any deployment guide for this, kindly share.
ThanksHi ,
As you said there is no use and meaning of having the cas array in exchange 2013 and also thanks a lot to Microsoft for introducing an single namespace facility in exchange 2013.
My suggestion and Microsoft recommendation should be to go with hardware load balancers for exchange 2013 rather than using the windows NLB and round robin method.
Why we need to go for HLB ?
Disadvantages
of some load balancing methods :
Windows
NLB :-
If you use Windows NLB then it can provide redundancy on server level failure and not on application level.
DNS
round robin :-
In case if we use the windows round robin method for load balancing then it wouldn't provide server level
and application level redundancy during the failures.At the Same time we need to manually adjust the DNS records during the server failure but on the client end dns caches will create the issues.
Configuring NLB for exchange 2013 :
http://msexchangeguru.com/2013/08/14/windowsnlb/
NLB configurations for exchange 2010 and 2013 will be same.
Configuring round robin for exchange 2013 :
http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-2013-client-access-server-high-availability/
Advisable method is to have the CAS and MBX roles on the same box if NLB not comes it to play.Because windows failover clustering and NLB cannot be configured on the same box.In exchange 2013 cas role is a stateless server role so there is no need to have
that role on a separate box.
Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham -
Exchange 2013 RTM, CU1, CU2 and CU3 are no longer supported.
Exchange 2013 RTM, CU1 , CU2 and CU3 are no longer supported.
Before posting a question, please ensure you are at the latest CU.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2015/04/14/end-of-exchange-2013-rtm-support.aspx
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.Exchange 2013 RTM, CU1 , CU2 and CU3 are no longer supported.
Before posting a question, please ensure you are at the latest CU.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2015/04/14/end-of-exchange-2013-rtm-support.aspx
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. -
Migrating from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 Public Folders coexistence
Hi all, I'm migrating from Exchange 2007 SP3 to Exchange 2013 SP1.
I have an Exchange 2007 server (Client Access, Hub Transport and Mailbox Server) in Site A, mailboxes and Publics Folders
In another Site in Site B, I have already installed (Client Access and Mailbox Server) Exchange 2013 server.
I am migrating test users, the fact is that users who migrated to Exchange Server 2013 Public folders do not see.
How I can make the migrated users from viewing the Exchange 2007 Public Folders duration coexistence?
Is there a "how to" to migrate Public Folders from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013?
thank you very much
Microsoft Certified IT Professional Server AdministratorHi,
In Exchange 2013, the Public Folder is changed to Public Folder mailbox instead of Public Folder in Exchange 2007 database.
Due to the changes in how public folders are stored, legacy Exchange mailboxes are unable to access the public folder hierarchy on Exchange 2013 servers. However, user mailboxes on Exchange 2013 servers or Exchange Online can connect to legacy
public folders. Exchange 2013 public folders and legacy public folders can’t exist in your Exchange organization simultaneously. This effectively means that
there’s no coexistence between versions.
For this reason, it’s recommended that prior to migrating your public folders, you should
first migrate your all legacy mailboxes to Exchange 2013. For more information about migrating public folder from previous versions, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj150486(v=exchg.150).aspx
(Please note the What do you need to know before you begin part in this link)
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 upgrade from 2010 and no mail flow and cannot move mailboxes
I am in the process of moving to Ex 2013 from 2010. I have installed Ex 2013 SP1 on a new server 2012 R2. All of my Ex 2010 servers are SP3 RU 5. Ex 2013 is running and I can connect through the EAC and see all other Exchange servers and connectors that
were already in existence. Several puzzling things are happening now that the servers are in coexistence:
1) As soon as Ex 2013 was installed on the network, many Outlook users are continuously being prompted to enter their domain credentials. They can cancel the prompt and Outlook still sends/receives email. No user mailboxes are on Ex 2013 yet.
Why is this happening?
2) I am following the Ex 2013 Deployment Assistant and I get to the step to move the Ex 2010 Arbitration mailbox to Ex 2013 and the move does not happen--it just says "syncing" and never completes. I tried moving a test mailbox from Ex 2010
to the 2013 database and I get the same result. I created the move request on the Ex2013 server and I see it as queued on the Ex2010 server, so I know they are "talking" to each other. However, when reviewing the status of the move I
see "MapiExceptionNoAccess: Unable to open message store".
3) There seems to be no mail flow on the same Ex2013 server or between the Ex 2010 and 2013 servers. I created two new test user mailboxes in Ex 2013. The Ex2013 mailboxes cannot send/receive to each other or to Ex 2010 users. This
seems strange, unless I am completely missing something in the Ex 2013 install?
I know this is a lot in one post, but following the Deployment assistant, I was hoping this would be something that others have faced. Thanks for any input here.Does the below points already fit for you.
Exchange 2013 Supported with the following minimum versions of Exchange:
1) Exchange*** 2010 SP3 on all Exchange 2010 servers in the organization, including Edge Transport servers.
2) Exchange 2013 CU2 or later on all Exchange 2013 servers in the organization.
*** If you want to create an EdgeSync Subscription between an Exchange 2010 Hub Transport server and an Exchange 2013 SP1 Edge Transport
server, you need to install Exchange 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 5 or later on the Exchange 2010 Hub Transport server.
Thanks Prem P Rana MCSA Messaging 2003 MCSE 2003 Server MCTS MCITP Exchange 2007, 2010 Gurgaon, India http://blogs.msexchange-experts.com -
Exchange 2013 not receiving internal and external emails ..
I have a coexistence of exchange 2007 and exchange 2013 ..2013 mailboxes where able to receive and send mails (internal and external) but suddenly the mail flow has stopped.
Mail flow status
2013 to 2007 = OK
2013 to internet = OK
2013 to 2013 = OK
2007 to 2013 = FAIL
Internet to 2013 = FAIL
incoming internet mails return the NDR below
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: mydomain.com
[email protected]
Remote Server returned '< #4.4.7 smtp;400 4.4.7 Message delayed>'
What could be a possible reason for this?
Cheers guys ..
..forever is just a minute away*Hi Richard,
Thank you for your question.
When there is a coexistence of Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2013, external email will be sent and received by Exchange 2013.
4.4.7 means message expired, message wait time in queue exceeds limit, potentially due to remote server(your Exchange server ) being unavailable.
If your organization has correct MX record in ISP. We could refer to the following link to check if MX record is correct:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998082(v=exchg.65).aspx
If we could telnet Exchange server by the following command: telnet mail.domain.com 25
If there is a receive connector on Exchange 2013 to receive Internet emails, we could create a receive connector to receive message from the Internet by the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj657447(v=exchg.150).aspx
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim -
Migration; Exchange 2003 SP2 to Exchange 2013 on new Domain and DC
I wasn't prepared for this task, and it was thrown at me to do... Eyes are bleeding from planning reading and planning, would LOVE any input from you guys. First time posting, here and have heard great things about these forums. The Company
I work for obtained a new client and a network that is in a cluster at the moment, so I'm having to dig through everything and restructure..
Scenario:
Old Domain/Server: (To be decommissioned)
Server 2003 Standard SP2 (Domain: cosco.com; NETBIOS name: coscoex)
Exchange 2003 SP2 (6.5.7638.1)
Server is a domain controller and exchange server.
Migrating to:
Server 2012 R2 Datacenter (New Domain ad.cosco.com; NETBIOS name: cosco)
VM #1: Server 2012 R2 Domain Controller at 2012 R2 Functionality
VM #2: Server 2012 R2 with Exchange 2013 Standard (Not Yet Installed) Joined to ad.cosco.com domain
VM #3: Server 2012 R2 with Exchange 2010 (Not Yet Installed) joined to ad.cosco.com domain
These are probably not ideal conditions, but I have to work with what I'm given.
Host server (2012 R2) is in work group mode. Hyper V Installed with a VM of Server 2012 R2 and as a DC at a functionality level of Server 2012 R2. I had intended starting at a lower functionality level and raising
it later, but.... ya I forgot to change it. If needed I can spool up a new DC with a lower functional level.
DNS, AD and group policy is all jacked up on the 2003 DC so that doesn't matter, All user accounts are going to be created under the new domain. The concern is migrating the mailboxes from Exchange 2003 on the old domain to
Exchange 2013 on the new domain. The client is going to provide CSV of the AD accounts that are still valid (a lot of accounts are no longer used or are from people that no longer with the organization.)
I had some ideas, but I'm not sure if they will work. This is something I have never done before (Senior Engineer Quit).
My thoughts:
- Establish a two way trust relationship between the two domains.
- Create two VM's, one with Exchange 2010 and one with Exchange 2013 (They have a 2010 licence that was not used).
- Create the users on the new domain
- Use the double hop method from Exchange 2003 > Exchange 2010 > Exchange 2013
- Link Exchange accounts to the correct user accounts on the new DC.
Can this be done cleanly? Am I going about this the correct way? Any feedback would be GREATLY appreciated.
Note: We are forced to use ad.cosco.com (Obviously not the actual domain name)Hi,
Base on my experience, your idea is feasible.
However, before getting started, you should note that Exchange 2010 (with any service pack or update rollups) is not (yet) supported to install on Windows 2012 R2. More details refer to the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/ff728623(v=exchg.150).aspx
After all the preparations complete, you can refer to the following articles to migration exchange 2003 to 2010, then to 2013:
Exchange 2003 to 2010 Cross-Forest Migration Step by Step Guide
Exchange 2010/2007 to 2013 Migration and Co-existence Guide
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 DNS for internal and external domain
Hi All,
I have been assigned a task to implement Microsoft Exchange Server 2013. I need some help in setting up DNS namespaces and design a strategy to have same internal and external names. Let me share some details here.
We have an Active Directory domain myinternaldomain.net, and we have a public domain
mypublicdomain.com and we have setup email policy to have
mypublicdomain.com as the SMTP domain for all the users. We have created another DNS zone in Active directory integrated DNS and created a records for
mail.mypublicdomain.com and autodiscover.mypublicdomain.com which will point to CAS NLB IP. We have 2 CAS servers and 2 MBX servers, we have configured DAG for MBX High availability and planning to implement WNLB for CAS as
hardware LB is out of scope due to budget constrains.
We want to have same URLs for OWA, Autodiscover, ECP and other services from internal network as well as from public network. Users should not be bothered to remember two URLs, using one from internal and other from public networks. I also want to confirm
that with this setup in place do i need to have myinternaldomain.net and server names in SAN certificate?
ThanksHi Sccmnb,
You can easily achieve this using split DNS.
Internal DNS hostname "mail.mypublicdomain.com" will be pointing to your internal CAS NLB IP and the external public DNS hostname"mail.mypublicdomain.com" will be pointing to the Network device or
Reverse proxy server IP.
Depending upon users access location(internal\external) the IPs would vary and they should be able to access the website with same name.
The names that you would require on the certificate(Use EAC or powershell to raise the request) for client connectivity would be
SN= mail.mypublicdomain.com
SAN= autodiscover.mypublicdomain.com
You don't need to have the active directory domain name present in the certificate.
Additional to this you need to update the AutodiscoverURI for all servers and OWA,ECP,Autodiscover Virtual Directories InternalURL and ExternalURL fields with appropiate public names.
Some additional Info:
*Internal vs. External Namespaces
Since the release of Exchange 2007, the recommendation is to deploy a split-brain DNS infrastructure for the Internet-based client namespaces. A split-brain DNS infrastructure enables different IP addresses to be returned for a given namespace
based on where the client resides – if the client is within the internal network, the IP address of the internal load balancer is returned; if the client is external, the IP address of the external gateway/firewall is returned.
This approach simplifies the end-user experience – users only have to know a single namespace (e.g., mail.contoso.com) to access their data, regardless of where they are connecting. A split-brain DNS infrastructure, also simplifies the configuration of Client
Access server virtual directories, as the InternalURL and ExternalURL values within the environment can be the same value.
*Managing Certificates in Exchange Server 2013 (Part 2)
*Nice step by step article
Designing a simple namespace for Exchange 2013
Regards,
Satyajit
Please“Vote As Helpful”
if you find my contribution useful or “MarkAs Answer” if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you. -
Exchange 2013 - Public Folder Mailbox and Single Item Recovery
Hello,
I recently had a request to recover some messages that an ex-employee deleted from the "recover deleted items" folder in their public folder. Since this resides on a public folder mailbox and it does have the option for
"Single Item Recovery" to be enabled on the box (which I enabled not knowing if this really works or not), is there a way I can still recovery these items or do I have to go to a backup to obtain those messages. Since ExFolders does not work that
is not an option. I've seen commands to restore a public folder that was deleted but not items that were deleted directly from a public folder. I checked using MFCMAPI and I do see the dumper root and the public folder dumpster for each folder but it
looks to be only the "deletions" folder and don't see anything similar to a "purges" type folder. Any ideas or am I stuck recovering from backup? Thanks in advance!So I think you are stuck and will need to restore the EDB to a Recovery Database to restore the items because when the end user purged the items from the "Recover Deleted Items" it removes them from the Recoverable Items/Deletions folder.
Check out this article
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/08/23/recovering-public-folder-information-in-exchange-2013.aspx
I have not played with the recoverable items settings on the 2013 public folder enabled mailbox EDB but you might try checking out Litigation or In Place Hold to use as a safety mechanism moving forward. That said this will also increase the
DB size so consider all the options before implementing
Search, Recover, & Extract Mailboxes, Folders, & Email Items from Offline Exchange Mailbox and Public Folder EDB's and Live Exchange Servers or Import/Migrate direct from Offline EDB to Any Production Exchange Server, even cross version i.e. 2003 -->
2007 --> 2010 --> 2013 with Lucid8's
DigiScope -
So we have an Exchange 2013 environment, and a CRM solution that requires basic authentication to EWS internally. Problem is, after a reboot of our Exchange server, all of our Outlook clients begin prompting for username and password (which nothing
works) which also starts locking users AD accounts out due to failed login attempts (somehow). If I disabled basic authentication on EWS, Outlook authenticates as normal using NTLM and there are no issues. Once Outlook has authenticated, I can
turn back on basic authentication, and Outlook will be fine until the next time the Exchange server is rebooted.
Any ideas?Hi,
According to your description, I understand that Outlook client prompted for username and password when Exchange server restart and basic authentication is enabled for EWS.
If I misunderstand your concern, please do not hesitate to let me know.
It’s normal. This caused by the difference between basic authentication and NTML authentication:
Basic, with any version of Outlook prior to 2010, results in a pop up dialog asking for creds. Outlook 2010 makes the 'save this password' actually work, so in an Outlook 2010 or later world, Basic can mean no need to authenticate every time you open/reconnect,
but in all earlier versions, you will have to enter creds every time.
NTLM, when used by a client that is domain joined and logged in with cached creds, results in the client simply sending the cached in creds to the server, resulting in what looks like a pretty seamless single sign on experience. However, if you want to do pre-authentication
at something like TMG, and not let the traffic go all the way to CAS, you need to configure TMG for this.
Thanks
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Allen Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 - Removing a database and deleting folders but they still reappear!!
Hi
I created a new database and moved all the user mailbox's plus discovery mailbox;s over and all went well, i then unmounted and deleted the old database in ECP and stopped all the exchange services and deleted the old database files and folders from the
C:, i noticed i was still getting some errors with windows backup and after looking around i notice for some reason under program files/microsoft/exchange server/v15/mailbox the old db folder appears with the sub folders 'indexmeta', 'journal' and 'ms', it
seems that the last trace of the old databases is still being used because the date is always todays date! everytime i delete these foldersers they come back!!
I think this is the reason why the windows backup is failing with 'this application will not be available from this backup'
any help would be appreciated!Hello,
If you want to remove the old database, you can follow this document to do that:
Manage Mailbox Databases in Exchange 2013
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj150580.aspx
Did you enable journal on the old database?
Thanks,
Evan Liu
TechNet Subscriber Support
in forum
If you have any feedback on our support, please contact
[email protected]
Evan Liu
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 stating their name and LAN IP in the message header
Friends,
our Exchange Server 2013 server is sending
emails normally, but some target servers are
complaining that our messages are coming up with
the name and LAN IP of the server
header.
Look at the picture that actually has
a moment where the Exchange server informs
its name and its IP, how can I
avoid this?
Companies that are complaining, say it
falls in the spam filter and then
denies delivery of the message.
Hold and thank you!
Ivanildo Teixeira GalvãoThat's expected and should not cause the message to be flagged as SPAM. If that is the case, just about all mail would be treated as SPAM. I doubt that is the reason.
You can remove those if you want with a hub transport rule, but I don't see the point.
http://www.msexchange.org/kbase/ExchangeServerTips/ExchangeServer2007/SecurityMessageHygiene/HowtoremoveinternalservernamesandIPaddressesfromSMTPheaders.html
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. -
Hello,
I'm struggeling with a problem. I've a clean installed exchange 2013 on a windows 2012 server. The DC is on a separate server. But I can't send a mail from Outlook and the recieve connector is correctly configured. There are no error's and mail in the queue
Even sending a mail from the OWA ends in the Drafts folder from that user.
Can somebody help me with this?
Thanks MichelHello,
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
I'm marking the reply as answer as there has been no update for a couple of days.
If you come back to find it doesn't work for you, please reply to us and unmark the answer.
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 with TMG 2010 and Go Daddy
Hi all;
actually I'm new to exchange server 2013 and I need some help:
recently I installed exchange 2013 in our domain with contains TMG 2010
what I need is sending emails out.
currently I can send emails internaly
I have static IP and TMG and registered domain in Go daddy.
could someone help me by steps what to do?
in TMG?
in Exchange administration?
in Go Daddy?what records needed and how?
and should I do any configurations in my DNS?
please I'm stuck in this.
ThanksSorry, my fault. Try these links:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx
http://www.isaserver.org/articles-tutorials/configuration-general/publishing-exchange-2013-outlook-web-app-forefront-threat-management-gateway-tmg-2010.html
CRM Advisor
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi, I can't seem to download apps they wait then load then wait again then a notification comes up and tells me I can't download them at this time but it tells me that in the afternoon and night I tried resetting it and pressing the sleep button and
-
Faces thumbnails missing after recovery from time machine
I got a new harddisk in my iMac via Apple's harddisk replacement program. I recovered all my data via a Time Machine backup (from a Time Capsule). All seemed fine after recovery of backup. When firing up iPhoto after the recovery iPhoto asks for upda
-
Formatting date in bpel ,any thoughts?
Both Input,Output fields are of type Date. Input Date is Julian Date I will get Input date as YYYY/MM/DD. I want to format and send- output date as YYYY-MM-DD I tried below ways, its not working <client:OutputDate> <xsl:value-of select="translate(/cl
-
"IntegrateTaskFlowWithTask" failed to preload on startup in Web application
Hi, We are implementing Fusion Compensation in our On-premise. When i am trying to run the 'HcmCompWorkBenchWorkArea.jspx' from Jdev Integrated Web Logic Server, i am running into below error. Any Idea on how to Resolve this.? *<Mar 7, 2013 8:33:49 P
-
Add a mac to an active directory group using a script?
I am managing a bunch of Macs and we are using Active Directory groups to assign certificates for 802.11x. I am binding the device to AD using JAMF software and was wondering if I could use a script to then add the deive to an active directory group.