Exchange 2013 Database Size didn't reduction after user move another DB.
Hi, I have two Exchange Server Ex01, Ex02 and two database DB1 and DB2. Already we move few user DB1 to DB2 but DB1 database size didn't reduction after move user.
Md. Ramin Hossain
Hi ,
If you delete or move a mailbox from a database will not create a free space on that database.Instead a white-space will be created on that database during the online defragmentation and that will not make any changes on the physical size of the database
.Then that white-space will be used when a new mailbox is created on that same database.
In case if you wanted to convert those white space to free space then you need to do an offline defragmentaion and that will make the physical change in the size of the database
Note : For offline defragmentation we should have the database to be in a dismounted state.
Command for offline defragmentation :
eseutil /d "path of the edb file"
But my suggestion would be to move the mailboxes to the newly created database instead of doing the offline defragmentation to attain the free space .Because it would take too much of time for the large databases to get completed.
Reference link for offline defragmentation :
http://exchangeserverpro.com/defrag-exchange-2010-mailbox-database/
Command to see the white space on the mailbox database :
ESEUTIL /MS "path of the edb file"
To execute the above we need the database to be in a dismounted state.
Reference Link :
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/4059c686-7c02-483b-9b15-891ca55295fe/running-the-eseutil-command-on-each-exchange-database-to-verify-database-whitespace?forum=exchangesvrgeneral
Please reply me if anything is unclear.
Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham
Similar Messages
-
Cannot Move Exchange 2013 Database "Object couldn't be found on" Error
Hello,
I am trying to move my exchange 2013 database to a different partition, when I enter the move-databasepath command, It says the operation couldn't be performed because object "databaseName" could not be found on "Southwestdc01"
My Exchange server name is SWPSExchange, I am in the exchange management shell on my exchange server, but it's as if it is looking for the database on my Active directory server. I have one DC, and an exchange server. Is there a way to specify
which server the database is on? If it would only look for the database on the SWPSExchange, it would work.
i verified the database name, the issue is when I run the move-database command, it is looking for the database on the wrong server.
Thanks for the help!Here is all the info:
My Exchange 2013 server is SWPSExchange, My AD Server is Southwestdc01, I am logged into the exchange server management shell on SWPSExchange, below is what I get, as you can see it is trying to find the database on Southwestdc01 instead of SWPSExchange.
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-MailboxDatabase
Name Server Recovery
ReplicationType
Mailbox Database 1279379856 SWPSEXCHANGE False None
PS] C:\Windows\system32>Move-DatabasePath -Identity 1279379856 -EdbFilePath E:\ExchangeDatabase\1279379856.edb
The operation couldn't be performed because object '1279379856' couldn't be found on 'SOUTHWESTDC01.Southwest.local'.
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Move-DatabasePath], ManagementObjectNotFoundException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : 3961D47F,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.SystemConfigurationTasks.MoveDatabasePath
+ PSComputerName : swpsexchange.southwest.local -
Exchange Server 2013 Database not showing in ECP after removal of Exchange Server 2010
I recently complete the migration of my Exchange 2010 server to Exchange 2013. I then proceeded to uninstall the 2010 server using setup.com /m:uninstall. At the end of the process I received an error that it did not complete the uninstall.
I checked the server and Exchanged 2010 was removed. When I checked ECP on 2013 it still showed the old 2010 server listed. I used ADSI edit and manually removed the old sever.
Now when I log into 2013 ECP I only see the one serve but when I go into databases, none are listed. I check under the server itself and it shows the database that it is using but it is not listed under the database tab.
If I do a search under the database tab I can find it and adds it to the list. I can then open and view details.
My issue is, after I log out and then back in, I have to run the search to find the database again. In ideas on how to have it show up in the list like it did before I removed the 2010 Exchange server?
Thank you,Hi,
From your description, I recommend you verify the following things for troubleshooting:
1. Please make sure that AD replication is completely by checking the user object's homeMDB attribute. This value should contain the DN value of the Exchange Server 2013 mailbox database.
2. Wait 30 minutes for the cache on the Exchange Server 2013 Client Access Server to clear or restart the MSExchangeOWAAppPool on the Exchange Server 2013 Client Access Server.
For more information, here is a kb for your reference.
Exchange 2013 Redirects to Exchange 2010 for OWA and ECP
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2931385
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 Database does not shrink
Hi
I'm migrating from lotus notes to exchange 2013 unfortunately when converted emails from lotus to pst and imported into exchange I realized later that a lot of replica
folders with similar content were present in users mailboxes hence this impacted a lot on the growth of edb[database]
Problem
I have delegated access- full logged into user mailbox deleted the folders and the content . infact on mailbox usage on the mailbox properties I see markable reduction of the size of
the mailbox however all this does not replicate to the database size the space it occupies on the disk /drive.
I have deleted and emptied the deleted folders and set the default retention to 0 days.
But no change
[PS] C:\Windows\system32> Get-MailboxDatabase -Status | select ServerName,Name,DatabaseSize
ServerName Name
DatabaseSize
S-HQ-EXMBX-01 DB01
200 GB (214,748,364,800 bytes)
S-HQ-EXMBX-01 DB02
228.8 GB (245,618,442,240 bytes)
S-HQ-EXMBX-01 DB04
235.8 GB (253,134,635,008 bytes)
S-HQ-EXMBX-01 DB03
239.6 GB (257,295,384,576 bytes)
Database
Drive
Total Storage
Available Storage
DB01
F
250 GB
6.29 GB
DB02
G
247 GB
6.15 GB
DB03
H
253 GB
3.34 GB
DB04
I
250 GB
4.60 GB
Total
1000
19 GB
Logs are on different drive . L
Any help or advise the storage is extremely limitedSo Ed is correct with his answer to shrink the DB's, however a few other issues to check and consider
Where are your log files located, i.e. if on the same drive it could be that you have allot of space being taken up by the log files, especially post import so I would check that first. Normally these should be truncated/cleaned up post successfully
Exchange aware backup however I have seen the backup choke if there are too many logs.
If the deleted data is now marked as white space then as Ed states the external physical size will remain the same until you defrag or move all the mailboxes to a new DB. However this is going to depend upon your deleted item and mailbox retention settings,
i.e. if the deleted items have not past the current retention time frame then defrag nor the mailbox move will save you any space until those items have past the retention point. You can of course set it to a lesser value
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123971%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx and then let it sit for a day, check the white space and if its an ample amount continue with the defrag or MB move.
What is the available white space within each database? Run the following from Exchange PowerShell "Get-MailboxDatabase
-Status | select Name, AvailableNewMailboxSpace"
Search, Recover, & Extract Mailboxes, Folders, & Email Items from Offline Exchange Mailbox and Public Folder EDB's and Live Exchange Servers or Import/Migrate direct from Offline EDB to Any Production Exchange Server, even cross version i.e. 2003 -->
2007 --> 2010 --> 2013 with Lucid8's
DigiScope -
Mailbox Database Size/White Space Reduction in a DAG
I have several large databases in which I'm moving mailboxes off of in an attempt to prevent my LUNs from running out of disk space. As well, I have several mailboxes of users who have left the company. My questions are as follows:
1. When I run remove-mailbox -id "some mailbox" -permanent $true, the mailbox is deleted from Exchange relatively instantly. Will Exchange recoup the white space that is left behind after the mailbox has been deleted so that the
database shrinks in size? Or will it just start writing over the white space rather than growing the size of the database?
2. Perataining to mailboxes that have been moved, if "Keep Deleted Mailboxes for" is set to 4 days on the database that holds mailboxes that I'm moving off, will the database hold onto the mailbox (even though it has successfully been moved to
another database) for the duration of the "Keep Deleted Mailboxes for" setting? Or will the mailbox be hard deleted after the move completes successfully?
3. As part of Online Maintenance, will Exchange defrag a databse and decrease the white space, thereby shrinking the database size or will I have to take it offline to do that?
4. What are the procedures to perform an Offline Defrag of an Exchange Databse? How risky is this?Hello,
To answer your questions:
1. When and online database defrag completes a pass on the database it will reclaim this as whitespace in the database. It will not however reclaim space on the disk by shrinking the .edb file. An offline defrag is required for that.
2. Moved mailbox will not be hard deleted until the 4 day retention period has past, unless you manually purge them using Remove-StoreMailbox.
3. Related to the answer for number 1. Exchange will fill whitespace as mailboxes grow, but it will not reclaim disk space.
4. In a DAG you will you need to dismount the mailbox database and run eseutil /d against the active database copy. This is a relatively low risk procedure, but requires databases to be offline thus interrupting mailbox access. It can also
take quite along time depending on the database size. The rate of defrag estimated by MS is 9 GB/hr. Here is a reference:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/192185/en-us
For these types of situations my preference (If disk space allows) is to move all mailboxes to a fresh database then delete the database with excessive white space -
Exchange 2013 CU7 OWA 400 Bad Request after successful login
Scenario:
Exchange 2007/2013 Migration
One
Exchange 2007 Server [removed]
One
Exchange 2013 Server Std, Windows 2012
All mailboxes moved to 2013
- November 27-30 2014
All public folders moved to
2013 - December 2, 2014
Exchange
2007 is still running and has not been removed from the domain, yet. [update]
Exchange
2007 removed from domain - 12-13-14
SSL
Certs are current for: Autodiscover.ExtDom.com, ex13.ExtDom.com, ex13.IntDom.com
Applied
CU6 (Dec 3, 2014) to fix Mobile access issues. Since applying CU6, OWA does not work with the exception of mobile browsers (Chrome - Nexus 7) or Safari 5.1.7 on Windows 7. These browsers get the OWA 2010 theme (Yellow).
User
logs into OWA with Domain\UserName and PWD(IE). After clicking Sign In, page returns Bad Request. No errors logged in w3scv logs.
[update]
CU7 applied 12-11-2014
All
users can connect using Outlook 2013 or Mobile (iPhone & Android)
Exchange
Admin Center (ECP) still works!
Browsers
tested: IE10 (windows 7 x64),Chrome 39.0.2171.71m, Opera 26.0, FireFox 34.0.5, Safari 5.1.7
Attempted:
https://ex13.ExtDom.com/owa
https://ex13.IntDom.com/owa
https://ex13.ExtDom.com/owa?ExchClientVer=15
https://ex13.IntDom.com/owa?ExchClientVer=15
https://localhost/owa
(on Ex 2013 server)
https://localhost/owa?ExchClientVer=15
(on Ex 2013 Server)
Fixes
attempted:
remove
| create Virtual Directories for OWA
Change
authentication through Exchange PowerShell - Integrated/Basic from FBA/Basic
reverted
since change didn’t work.
Run
UpdateCas.ps1
Run
UpdateConfigFiles.ps1
IISReset
(iisReset /NoForce fails)
OWA
(Default Web Site) displays as Version 15.0 (Build 995.29) in EAC. [update] Build 1044.25 (CU7)
Links
used for troubleshooting:
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/514617-exchange-2013-unable-to-login-to-owa-ecp
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/ie/en-US/f8aa95d4-19e4-483c-8c4b-b039ab0d0127/400-bad-request-when-logging-in-to-owa-exchange-2013?forum=exchangesvrclients
http://tecfused.com/2013/09/23/exchange-2013-ecp-double-login-error-400/
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/c25ce81c-76ea-471a-93ae-eeaf9e5015ac/exchange-2013-owa-error-400-bad-request?forum=exchangesvradmin
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2871485/en-gbHi,
Does it work if you disable the FBA and only use the basic authentication?
Please also let us know the authentication settings on the Default Web site.
Thanks,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 Database and Mailbox sizing configuration feedback?
Hello,
I am in the process of deploying Exchange 2013 in our environment, it will co-exist with Exchange 2010 until we move everyone over to the new server.
My question is regards to the disk storage design, we have a SAN that Exchange will share with the rest of our Virtual Machines. I plan to have 20 live databases and 20 archive databases so I can balance out mailboxes per database so that each db is roughly
100GB in size.
The goal is is to keep the size down so that any database specific maintenance can finish quicker and if I ever had to deal with db corruption it is faster to restore, backup, etc.
My question is, is there a lot of overhead I will be adding onto the Exchange server by having 40 databases mounted?
Currently 300 users, 3.5TB in exchange databases between live and archive mailboxes (no mailbox caps), with 40 databases (20/20) it spreads out nicely with roughly 15 users per db, and db size is roughly 100GB.
My concern is having 40 databases mounted on a single EXCH2013 multi-role server? We have no DAG, etc.
The machine is a 4vCPU/32GB and the disks are on a Compellent tiered SAN shared among other VMs.
Thanks.Hi,
It depends on various things. I would suggest you to start with Server Role Requirement Calculator to see your hardware is sufficient to handle the load or not...
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/14/released-exchange-2013-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Exchange-2013-Server-Role-f8a61780
Blog |
Get Your Exchange Powershell Tip of the Day from here -
Exchange 2013 database unplaned to active on another mailbox server
we have to four mailbox servers, two in primary site, two in dr site. it happens an unplaned failover issue, all of database are actived on mailbox server1, but some hours later, these database are unplaned to active on another mailbox server2, it also happens
in mailbox server2. that's why? after check eventlog, I found below:
AppLogEventID: 3169
AppLogEventMessage:
(Active Manager) Database MDB00 was successfully moved from shmbx01.ebaotech.com to SHMBX02.ebaotech.com. Move comment: Managed availability system failover initiated by Responder=OutlookRpcDeepTestFailover Component=Outlook.
also check server health, found OutlookRpcDeepTestMonitor is degraded, OutlookRpcSelfTestMonitor is unhealty
Server State Name
TargetResource HealthSetName AlertValue ServerComponent
shmbx01 NotApplicable OutlookRpcSelfTestMonitor
Outlook.Protocol Unhealthy None
shmbx01 NotApplicable OutlookRpcDeepTestMonitor
Outlook.Protocol Degraded None
shmbx01 NotApplicable PrivateWorkingSetWarningThresholdExceeded.m.e.rpcclientaccess.service microsoft.exchange.rpcclientaccess.service Outlook.Protocol Healthy None
shmbx01 NotApplicable ProcessProcessorTimeErrorThresholdExceeded.m.e.rpcclientaccess.service microsoft.exchange.rpcclientaccess.service Outlook.Protocol Healthy None
shmbx01 NotApplicable ExchangeCrashEventErrorThresholdExceeded.m.e.rpcclientaccess.service microsoft.exchange.rpcclientaccess.service Outlook.Protocol Healthy None
shmbx01 NotApplicable OutlookMapiHttpSelfTestMonitor
Outlook.Protocol Healthy None
shmbx01 NotApplicable OutlookMapiHttpDeepTestMonitor
Outlook.Protocol Healthy None
I don't know what causes this issue, and how can I resovle it to prevent the database unplaned failover, please help to look into it. thanks.Hi,
Based on my knowledge, this issue can be caused by the following reasons:
1. Antivirus software. Please disable the Antivirus software to see if it works.
2. LmCompatibilityLevel. For Windows server 2008 R2 or Windows server 2012, this value should be 3. I suggest you modify the value to 3 on all of your Exchange 2013 servers to check the result.
2. Outlook responders. Please try to disable the Outlook responders to check the result.
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013 Mailbox Size Limits
Are there any hard limits on mailbox sizes in Exchange 2013 (either in terms of mailbox size or item count)?
Note: I am aware of the public folder mailbox size limits as well as the hard limit of 2TB for mailbox databases.I believe the max mailbox size is 100 GB
http://blogs.technet.com/b/ashwinexchange/archive/2012/12/17/3541150.aspx
Major changes in Information Store
Managed Store
Newly rewritten Information Store processes, Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Service.exe and Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Worker.exe.
Each database runs under its own process, allowing for isolation of store issues to a single database.
Tightly integrated with MSExchangeRepl.exe to provide higher availability through improved resiliency.
Public Folder Database no longer exist.
Exchange 2013 it supports up to 100 GB of Mailbox size, with OL2013 OST file size can be controlled.
Exchange 2013 Enterprise Edition can only mount 50 databases on a mailbox server -
Exchange 2013 Mail Size Limits
I am having an issue with setting the max send and receive size on Exchange 2013. I keep getting the following error when I attempt to send a 20 meg file server to an internal exchange account OR if I attempt to send a 20 meg file from the exchange
server to an external account:
#550 5.3.4
ROUTING.SizeLimit; message size exceeds fixed maximum size for route ##
I have checked the mail sizes and below is the report. I currently have both send and receive set to 100MB. Is there some other setting in 2013 that I am not aware of?
AnonymousSenderToRecipientRatePerHour : 1800
ClearCategories
: True
ConvertDisclaimerWrapperToEml : False
DSNConversionMode
: UseExchangeDSNs
ExternalDelayDsnEnabled : True
ExternalDsnDefaultLanguage :
ExternalDsnLanguageDetectionEnabled : True
ExternalDsnMaxMessageAttachSize : 100 MB (104,857,600 bytes)
ExternalDsnReportingAuthority :
ExternalDsnSendHtml
: True
ExternalPostmasterAddress :
GenerateCopyOfDSNFor :
HygieneSuite
: Standard
InternalDelayDsnEnabled : True
InternalDsnDefaultLanguage :
InternalDsnLanguageDetectionEnabled : True
InternalDsnMaxMessageAttachSize : 100 MB (104,857,600 bytes)
InternalDsnReportingAuthority :
InternalDsnSendHtml
: True
InternalSMTPServers
JournalingReportNdrTo : <>
LegacyJournalingMigrationEnabled : False
LegacyArchiveJournalingEnabled : False
LegacyArchiveLiveJournalingEnabled : False
RedirectUnprovisionedUserMessagesForLegacyArchiveJournaling : False
RedirectDLMessagesForLegacyArchiveJournaling : False
MaxDumpsterSizePerDatabase : 18 MB (18,874,368 bytes)
MaxDumpsterTime
: 7.00:00:00
MaxReceiveSize
: 100 MB (104,857,600 bytes)
MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit : 500
MaxRetriesForLocalSiteShadow : 2
MaxRetriesForRemoteSiteShadow : 4
MaxSendSize
: 100 MB (104,857,600 bytes)
MigrationEnabled
: False
OpenDomainRoutingEnabled : False
RejectMessageOnShadowFailure : False
Rfc2231EncodingEnabled : False
SafetyNetHoldTime
: 2.00:00:00
ShadowHeartbeatFrequency : 00:02:00
ShadowMessageAutoDiscardInterval : 2.00:00:00
ShadowMessagePreferenceSetting : PreferRemote
ShadowRedundancyEnabled : True
ShadowResubmitTimeSpan : 03:00:00
SupervisionTags
: {Reject, Allow}
TLSReceiveDomainSecureList : {}
TLSSendDomainSecureList : {}
VerifySecureSubmitEnabled : False
VoicemailJournalingEnabled : True
HeaderPromotionModeSetting : NoCreate
Xexch50Enabled
: TrueHello Landfish,
Good Day...
The output gives the information that Size limit set for Receive and Send is 100 mb, but setting could have changed. So you can follow the below steps to resolve the issue.
There are basically three places where you can configure default message size limits on Exchange:
Organization transport settings
Send/receive connector settings
User mailbox settings.
To check your server’s current limit you can open Exchange Management Shell
Try the below commands to check the Message quota size limit
get-transportconfig | ft maxsendsize, maxreceivesize
get-receiveconnector | ft name, maxmessagesize
get-sendconnector | ft name, maxmessagesize
get-mailbox Administrator |ft Name, Maxsendsize, maxreceivesize
To change the above size limits based on your requirement.
Set-TransportConfig -MaxSendSize 200MB -MaxReceiveSize 500MB (Size is based on your requirement)
Attachment size limit
To set up the rule you can use the below PowerShell cmdlet, as the method is quite simple
New-TransportRule -Name LargeAttach -AttachmentSizeOver 20MB -RejectMessageReasonText "Message attachment size over 20MB - email rejected."
For More info
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124708(v=exchg.150).aspx
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts @ Techrid.com -
Exchange 2013 database dismounts unexpectedly
Errors logged on Exchange 2013:
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 12/09/2013 8:22:28 AM
Event ID: 1001
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store has encountered an internal logic error. Internal error text is (Unable to apply maintenance insert, index corruption?
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 12/09/2013 8:22:29 AM
Event ID: 1002
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Unhandled exception (Microsoft.Exchange.Diagnostics.ExAssertException: ASSERT: Unable to apply maintenance insert, index corruption?
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchange Common
Date: 12/09/2013 8:22:37 AM
Event ID: 4999
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Watson report about to be sent for process id: 11204, with parameters: E12, c-RTL-AMD64, 15.00.0712.024, M.E.Store.Worker, M.E.S.Storage.LazyIndexing, M.E.S.S.L.LogicalIndex.HandleIndexCorruptionInternal, M.E.Diagnostics.ExAssertException, 213a, 15.00.0712.000.
ErrorReportingEnabled: True
KB2846288 appeared to be related but we are already on CU2:
Name : XXXXXXXX
Edition : Standard
AdminDisplayVersion : Version 15.0 (Build 712.24)
Anyone else?
Ramu V RamananRandomly approx once per week. Always on the same mailbox database.
Drives have plenty of space, memory and pagefile are fine.
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 7/05/2014 11:46:53 a.m.
Event ID: 1001
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Microsoft Exchange Server Information Store has encountered an internal logic error. Internal error text is (Unable to apply maintenance insert, index corruption?
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 7/05/2014 11:46:53 a.m.
Event ID: 1002
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Unhandled exception (Microsoft.Exchange.Diagnostics.ExAssertException: ASSERT: Unable to apply maintenance insert, index corruption?
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchangeIS
Date: 7/05/2014 11:46:53 a.m.
Event ID: 1013
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
The mailbox with mailboxguid "xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" caused crash or resource outage on database (GUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx")
Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchange Common
Date: 7/05/2014 11:46:53 a.m.
Event ID: 4999
Task Category: General
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Watson report about to be sent for process id: 18108, with parameters: E12, c-RTL-AMD64, 15.00.0775.038, M.E.Store.Worker, M.E.S.Storage.LazyIndexing, M.E.S.S.L.LogicalIndex.HandleIndexCorruptionInternal, M.E.Diagnostics.ExAssertException, 213a, 15.00.0775.008.
ErrorReportingEnabled: False -
How to get Exchange 2010 database size c#
I'm trying to get smallest Exchange database in my Exchange 2010 server using remote session.
I successfully connect to my exchange server and get database with properties. Some of them with value, but Properties "DatabaseSize" with Null value for each of them.
Did some body be able to get database size value?
For me important to use URI to connect Exchange DAG.
Part of my code below:
static void Main(string[] args)
string exchangePowershellRPSURI = "http://my.domain/powershell?serializationLevel=Full";
PSCredential credentials = (PSCredential)null;
//Provides the connection information that is needed to connect to a remote runspace
// Prepare the connection
WSManConnectionInfo connInfo = new WSManConnectionInfo((new Uri(exchangePowershellRPSURI)),
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/powershell/Microsoft.Exchange", credentials);
connInfo.AuthenticationMechanism = AuthenticationMechanism.Kerberos;
connInfo.SkipCACheck = true;
connInfo.SkipCNCheck = true;
connInfo.SkipRevocationCheck = true;
// Create the runspace where the command will be executed
Runspace runspace = RunspaceFactory.CreateRunspace(connInfo);
// Add the command to the runspace's pipeline
runspace.Open();
//Represents the base functionality of a pipeline that can be used to invoke commands
Pipeline pipeline = runspace.CreatePipeline();
Command getMDB = new Command("Get-MailboxDatabase");
getMDB.Parameters.Add("Identity", "*");
getMDB.Parameters.Add("Status", null);
pipeline.Commands.Add(getMDB);
Collection<PSObject> select = pipeline.Invoke();
if (select.Count > 0)
foreach(PSObject obj in select)
var db = obj.Properties["DatabaseSize"].Value;
string name = obj.Properties["Name"].Value.ToString();
Console.WriteLine("Database Name: {0} Size: {1}", name, db);
else
Console.WriteLine("Failed to create email account");
runspace.Dispose();
Console.ReadLine();I found solution of my problem by myself. I just changed in string
getMDB.Parameters.Add("Status", null);
"null" to "true" like this:
getMDB.Parameters.Add("Status", true);
Now everything work fine for me. -
Exchange 2013 Attachment Size Issue
Hi everybody,
I'm having some trouble with an Exchange 2013 server.
The users are not able to receive messages with a size bigger than 10MB, i tried with serveral attachments.
I already did te following:
Changed the maximum receive size through the ECP to 60MB (on the default frontend Exchange), and restarted te transport service.
Set the receive size through PowerShell with the following command.
set-transportconfig -maxreceivesize 35MB
when i check the receive size properties, it accepts 35MB messages. (get-transportconfig -property maxreceivesize)
Also restarted serveral Exchange transport services.
Checked the router if there are any special firewall rules, but there are none.
When I send an email with an attachment (PDF about 4 meg), it receives like it should.
Once I send a same email but with an 11meg PDF file, it is not delivered.
When sending this e-mail and attechment, i checked the box to notify me when the message has been deliverd.
I don't get any response, no NDR, nothing...
Tried e-mail tracking but there is no trace of my message.
Am I missing anything?
Kind regards,
TimHi,
Please check the message size limit on receive connector, by default it’s 35MB
Get-ReceiveConnector “connector name”| fl MaxMessageSize
Also check if there are any message size limit in transport rule.
Get-transportrule | fl MessageSizeOver
Message size limits
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124345(v=exchg.150).aspx
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Lynn-Li
TechNet Community Support -
SQL azure database size not dropping down after deleting all table
Dear all,
I have a simple database on Azure for which I have deleted all table data. The size of the database is still showing 5Mb of data and I am charge for that. I have heard that this may happen from cluster index getting fragmented.
I have run a querry I found on internet on all my table index to show percentage of fragmentation and all report 0%.
DBA is not so my job but what could it be or how can I reduce that size ?
ON premise I would use COMPACT DB but not available in azure like some others DB action
Thnaks for tips
regardsuser created objects/data are not the only ones stored in your database. you got system objects and metadata as Mike mentions above.
are you trying to skip being charged if you're not storing data? looking at the pricing table, you'll still get charged the $4.995 for the 0-100MB database size range. -
Exchange 2013 Give domain Admin access to all users inbox
In the old 2007 exchange server we had domain admin access to everyones mailbox so we could open anyones email box using outlook client.
But in 2013 exchange the mailbox delegation does not give us the option to add a "group" to the full access area, old allows to add a "user" who has a mailbox setup in exchange. I see there is Exchange Server group listed under Full Access
, but it does not work added our domain Admin user to that group rebooted exchange and the test machine but did not work.
Only option that works to allow mounting of xyz users mailbox via abc admin user is to actually add that abc admin user to the xyz mailbox under mailbox delegation > Full Access.
Is there a work around this, so we can simply have a group ABCD with user ABC or DEF etc. etc. so they can access everyones mailbox instead of going in and changing all users mailbox delegation one by one for the new user etc. ?Have you tried using the Exchange Management Shell?
Get-Mailbox | Add-MailboxPermission -User Name_of_Group -AccessRights FullAccess -InheritanceType All
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."
I did i tried get-mailboxpermission and other than NT Authority and the end user the Deny was set to True for all inheritance rights. I tried your command, added user to the group i wanted under Enterprise OU in AD and restarted transport on exchange and
logged in on the test machine again.
Still no go, the user I am trying to add when using get-mailboxpermission shows up as Denied for fullaccess so is that overriding the group permissions ?
RunspaceId : 2xxxxxxx0
AccessRights : {FullAccess}
Deny : True
InheritanceType : All
User : domain\abc
Identity : domain/Users/xyzuser
IsInherited : False
IsValid : True
ObjectState : Unchanged
And for the group i just added with the above abc user inside it:
RunspaceId : 2xxxxxxxxx0
AccessRights : {FullAccess}
Deny : False
InheritanceType : All
User : domain\newgroupadded
Identity : domain/Users/xyzuser
IsInherited : False
IsValid : True
ObjectState : Unchanged
So is the users deny is causing this ? Not really sure why ABC domain admin/enterprise admin is the only one listed as no deny, there are other mailbox users that do not show up, I am assuming I have to create a new user a domain local user and that might
work ? I wanted the Domain/Enterprise Manager/admin to have access so we would not have to keep toggling between users just to access someones inbox.
Also further down the list of mailboxpermission i see the user abc (the user i want to add to the group to have access) is listed with Full access and Deny flag is set to False instead of True.
So have two entries for user abc one with deny flag set to true and one with deny flag to false.
AccessRights : {FullAccess, DeleteItem, ReadPermission, ChangePermission, ChangeOwner}
Deny : False
InheritanceType : All
Maybe you are looking for
-
IPad not wanting to click on things
My iPad 2 is not wanting to click on things in Safari. I tried restarting it and it did not help. Any suggestions?
-
Why i cant send itunes gift using my credit card?
Why i cant send itunes gift using my credit card?
-
User syncing from one DC to another
Dear friends, Let me tell you the details. I have domain a domain A and domain B, created trust between the domains. Joined machines to Domain A and can login as Domain B user. We have an exchange in domain B and the Domain A users have mailboxes in
-
Hi, Ours is still BI 10g with DAC 7.9.6. We have a execution plan scheduled which extracts data from source files to load staging thru informatica and eventually final target tables. On holidays there is no business done, so NO input file is sent...
-
hi