Exchange 2013 Role Permissions for Activesync Quarantine device
Hi,
i need a group or user that have access only to allow the Mobile Devices in the Quarantine.
can someone tell me how to complete this task?
Thanks
Hi,
Thanks for info
Regards,
Enis
Similar Messages
-
Exchange 2013 IOPS Requirements for ActiveSync and anti-virus
I am currently planning to replace my Exchange 2003 server with Exchange 2013. I have used the Exchange Server 2013 Role Requirements Calculator but I'm stuck on how much additional IOPS to add for ActiveSync and my anti-virus solution (Symantec Mail Security
for Microsoft Exchange). The only info I've found for ActiveSync in regards to additional IOPS is to add .5 but nothing for SMSMSE. Symantec's web site has nothing on this (the question has been asked but not answered). I've also seen the ActiveSync question
asked but not answered.
Any advice or guidance would be appreciated.
Thank you.Only Symantec can answer that for the A/V, but for ActiveSync, assuming you are using mostly Android/iOS, I would recommend using 1.3 for both IOPS Multiplication Factor and Megacycles Multiplication Factor.
Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. -
Migrating from 2010 windows nlb cas array to exchange 2013 using netscaler for HLB
i currently have exchange 2010 sp3 setup as follows
2 cas/ht using windows nlb for array.internal.com as the nlb name
2 mailbox servers using 1 dag for replication between them.
I would like to stand up 2 new CAS 2013 sp1 servers(2012 r2) and use our netscaler hlb to load balance and do ssl offloading.
id like to use the hlb to load balance and ssl offload all possible traffic not just owa, i.e. activesync etc.
the netscaler is running version 10.5.
does anyone have any thoughts on how to perform such a migration?
id like to make this as seamless as possible for the user, so no owa name change or anything like that.
thx in advance for any help.Exchange 2013 CAS cannot be managed effectively without an Exchange 2013 mailbox server since the CAS won't run the Exchange 2013 management tools without it. Your Exchange 2013 servers should simply have both roles. There are few cases where
splitting the roles has any business value.
If what you're planning to do is within the same forest and organization, then it's a "transition", not a "migration". What you are asking to do is easy. Build the Exchange 2013 servers, configure load balancing, test
access, and then switch the DNS records to point to them.
Personally, I would skip the SSL offloading. It's my opinion that it makes the solution more difficult to troubleshoot without providing any real benefit.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -
Exchange 2013 CU2, Alert for OWA Health set unhealthy from SCOM 2012
I am facing issue in Exchange 2013 CU2, I got this alert from SCOM 2012 atleast 5-6 times a day, OWA health set is unhealthy, I have done all the steps mentioned in this web link. Authentication type for OWA Virtual directory is integrated windows and Basic.
I have 2 CAS servers, and this alert generated from both of them.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms.exch.scom.OWA(EXCHG.150).aspx?v=15.0.712.24
Alert: Health Set unhealthy
Source: EX-CAS - OWA
Path: EX-CAS;EX-CAS
Last modified by: System
Last modified time: 1/5/2014 8:15:08 PM
Alert description: Outlook Web Access logon is failing on ClientAccess server EX-CAS.
Availability has dropped to 0%. You can find protocol level traces for the failures on C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\Logging\Monitoring\OWA\ClientAccessProbe.
Incident start time: 1/6/2014 4:05:08 AM
Last failed result:
Failing Component - Owa
Failure Reason - CafeFailure
Exception:
System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.ScenarioException:
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.ScenarioException:
Failure source: Owa
Failure reason: CafeFailure
Failing component:Owa
Exception hint: CafeErrorPage: CafeFailure Unauthorized Inner exception: Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException
ErrorPageFailureReason: CafeFailure, RequestFailureContext: FailurePoint=FrontEnd, HttpStatusCode=401, Error=Unauthorized, Details=, HttpProxySubErrorCode=, WebExceptionStatus=
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: An error occurred on the Client Access server while processing the request
WebExceptionStatus: Success
GET https://localhost/owa/ HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; MSEXCHMON; ACTIVEMONITORING; OWACTP)
Accept: */*
Cache-Control: no-cache
X-OWA-ActionName: Monitoring
Cookie:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
request-id: 211474d2-a43e-4fab-8038-3aab35353568
X-FailureContext: FrontEnd;401;VW5hdXRob3JpemVk;;;
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate,NTLM,Basic realm="localhost"
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-FEServer: EX-CAS
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:14:47 GMT
Content-Length: 0
Response time: 0s
---> Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException
ErrorPageFailureReason: CafeFailure, RequestFailureContext: FailurePoint=FrontEnd, HttpStatusCode=401, Error=Unauthorized, Details=, HttpProxySubErrorCode=, WebExceptionStatus=
Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.CafeErrorPageException: An error occurred on the Client Access server while processing the request
WebExceptionStatus: Success
GET https://localhost/owa/ HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; MSEXCHMON; ACTIVEMONITORING; OWACTP)
Accept: */*
Cache-Control: no-cache
X-OWA-ActionName: Monitoring
Cookie:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
request-id: 211474d2-a43e-4fab-8038-3aab35353568
X-FailureContext: FrontEnd;401;VW5hdXRob3JpemVk;;;
Server: Microsoft-IIS/7.5
WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate,NTLM,Basic realm="localhost"
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-FEServer: EX-CAS
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:14:47 GMT
Content-Length: 0
Response time: 0s
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseExceptionAnalyzer.Analyze(TestId currentTestStep, HttpWebRequestWrapper request, HttpWebResponseWrapper response, Exception exception, Action`1 trackingDelegate)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.AnalyzeResponse[T](HttpWebRequestWrapper request, HttpWebResponseWrapper response, Exception exception, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.EndSend[T](IAsyncResult result, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse, Boolean fireResponseReceivedEvent)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.HttpSession.EndGet[T](IAsyncResult result, HttpStatusCode[] expectedStatusCodes, Func`2 processResponse)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.Authenticate.AuthenticationResponseReceived(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseTestStep.EndExecute(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.Owa.OwaLogin.AuthenticationCompleted(IAsyncResult result)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Microsoft.Exchange.Net.MonitoringWebClient.BaseTestStep.EndExecute(IAsyncResult result)
at System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory`1.FromAsyncCoreLogic(IAsyncResult iar, Func`2 endFunction, Action`1 endAction, Task`1 promise, Bool
States of all monitors within the health set:
Note: Data may be stale. To get current data, run: Get-ServerHealth -Identity 'EX-CAS' -HealthSet 'OWA'
State
Name
TargetResource HealthSet
AlertValue ServerComponent
NotApplicable OwaCtpMonitor
OWA
Unhealthy None
States of all health sets:
Note: Data may be stale. To get current data, run: Get-HealthReport -Identity 'EX-CAS'
State
HealthSet
AlertValue LastTransitionTime
MonitorCount
NotApplicable ActiveSync
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:13 AM
2
NotApplicable AD
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:54:18 AM
10
NotApplicable ECP
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:03:05 AM
1
Online
Autodiscover.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
NotApplicable Autodiscover
Healthy 1/3/2014 10:18:17 PM
2
Online
ActiveSync.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
Online
ECP.Proxy
Healthy
11/21/2013 6:16:08 PM 4
Online
EWS.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
1
Online
OutlookMapi.Proxy
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:54:28 AM
4
Online
OAB.Proxy
Healthy 11/19/2013 7:14:34 PM
1
Online
OWA.Proxy
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:06:37 AM
2
NotApplicable EDS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:56 AM
10
Online
RPS.Proxy
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:27 AM
13
Online
RWS.Proxy Healthy
1/3/2014 5:20:09 AM 10
Online
Outlook.Proxy
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:12 AM
4
NotApplicable EWS
Healthy 1/3/2014 10:18:17 PM
2
Online
FrontendTransport
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
11
Online
HubTransport
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
29
NotApplicable Monitoring
Unhealthy 1/5/2014 4:05:57 AM
9
NotApplicable DataProtection
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:25:42 AM
1
NotApplicable Network Healthy
1/4/2014 1:51:16 PM 1
NotApplicable OWA
Unhealthy 1/5/2014 8:05:08 PM
1
NotApplicable FIPS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:12 AM
3
Online
Transport
Healthy 1/5/2014 4:11:00 AM
9
NotApplicable RPS
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:07:12 AM
2
NotApplicable Compliance
Healthy 11/20/2013 10:08:10 AM
2
NotApplicable Outlook
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:12:54 PM
2
Online
UM.CallRouter
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:10 AM
7
NotApplicable UserThrottling
Healthy 1/5/2014 4:16:42 AM
7
NotApplicable Search
Healthy
11/24/2013 6:55:06 AM 9
NotApplicable AntiSpam
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:16:43 AM
3
NotApplicable Security
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:28 AM
3
NotApplicable IMAP.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:14 AM
3
NotApplicable Datamining
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:18:34 AM
3
NotApplicable Provisioning
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:56 AM
3
NotApplicable POP.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:44 AM
3
NotApplicable Outlook.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:46 AM
3
NotApplicable ProcessIsolation
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:26 AM
9
NotApplicable Store
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:38 AM
6
NotApplicable TransportSync
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:53:09 AM
3
NotApplicable MailboxTransport
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:21:11 AM
6
NotApplicable EventAssistants
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:22:01 PM
2
NotApplicable MRS
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:29 AM
3
NotApplicable MessageTracing
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:18:15 AM
3
NotApplicable CentralAdmin
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:25 AM
3
NotApplicable UM.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:08 AM
3
NotApplicable Autodiscover.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:17:13 AM
3
NotApplicable OAB
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:51 AM
3
NotApplicable OWA.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:20:52 AM
3
NotApplicable Calendaring
Healthy 11/24/2013 6:56:59 AM
3
NotApplicable PushNotifications.Protocol
Healthy 11/21/2013 6:16:05 PM
3
NotApplicable EWS.Protocol
Healthy 1/3/2014 5:19:07 AM
3
NotApplicable ActiveSync.Protocol
Healthy
1/3/2014 5:20:16 AM 3
NotApplicable RemoteMonitoring
Healthy 1/5/2014 3:47:09 AM
3
Any solution for this alert, how to rectify it, but OWA is running perfect for all users.Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
Do we have Exchange 2010 coexistence?
If it is the case, I know the following known issue:
Release Notes for Exchange 2013
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj150489%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
Please note the "Exchange 2010 coexistence" session.
If it is not related to our problem, please check the IIS log.
If there is any detailed error code, like 401.1, 401.2, please let me know.
Hope it is helpful
Thanks
Mavis
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support -
Set Exchange 2013 calendar permissions with Outlook 2007
Hi,
I have a new install of Exchange 2013 with ~30 Win 7, Office 2007 clients. Setting permissions on calendars doesn't work properly from Outlook 2007 (a known MS issue). Does anyone know if there is a fix or work around to assign permissions to the calendar?
i.e. where you right click the Calendar folder and set different levels of permission. There is a 'permission' option in OWA but this doesnt appear to work for calendars.
I have tried Outlook 2013 and that works ok. Is there alternate way to save having to move to Outlook 2013?
Thanks.Hi,
The above issue occurs because of a limitation in how Exchange Server 2013 set Free/Busy permissions. The workaround is to use OWA to set up calendar permissions.
Here is a helpful article about setting up calendar permissions in OWA for your reference.
Sharing your calendar in Outlook Web App
https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Sharing-your-calendar-in-Outlook-Web-App-7ecef8ae-139c-40d9-bae2-a23977ee58d5?CorrelationId=7fe34d54-c3e4-4ca4-a83d-450dbd8075a5&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US#_Toc342645965
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support -
Exchange 2013, clients prompting for password
Exchange 2013 SP1 on Server 2012 R2 both fully patched. Exchange 2013 is a single server will all roles installed. There is also an Exchange 2007 (fully pathed) as we are in the process of migrating the users.
Setup legay.company.com points to Exchange 2007 and mail.company.com point to Exchange 2013
Security on Exchange 2013 set to NTLM for External and Internal.
Mobile access works for user on Exchange 2013 and Exchange 2007
Client with Mailbox's on Exchange 2013 using Outlook 2010 - 2013 internally and externally getting prompted for username and password.
Clients with Mailbox's on Exchange 2007 ok.
Checked IIS, autodiscover, EWS and Kernal mode is set.
Nothing showing in the Event Logs.Hi Skynite,
I have met this issue before, I recommend you try the following method and check the result:
In this situation, you must set LmCompatibilityLevel on the client to a value of 2. To do this, follow these steps.
Click Start, click Run, type
regedit in the Open box, and then press ENTER.<u5:p></u5:p>
Locate and then click the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\
In the pane on the right side, double-click lmcompatibilitylevel.<u5:p></u5:p>
In the Value data box, type a value of 2 and then click
OK.<u5:p></u5:p>
Exit Registry Editor.<u5:p></u5:p>
Restart your computer.<u5:p></u5:p>
More details about this Key, please refer to the following link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc960646.aspx
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support -
Querying Exchange 2013 Mail server for email items using c# and Exchange Web Services
I am trying to upgrade an existing application that reads Exchange 2003 using WebDAV. The mail server is to be upgraded to Exchange 2013, so I am checking how I can use EWS.
I have a problem in that although I know the inbox has unread items with attachments, the query I am running against the
FindItems object is returning empty (results.totalCount=0)
Here is my code snippet:
private static void GetAttachments(ExchangeService service)
// Return a single item.
ItemView view = new ItemView(100);
ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = CertificateValidationCallBack;
ExchangeService service = new ExchangeService(ExchangeVersion.Exchange2010_SP2);// .Exchange2007_SP1);
service.UseDefaultCredentials = true;
service.AutodiscoverUrl("[email protected]", RedirectionUrlValidationCallback);
ItemView view = new ItemView(1);
string querystring = "HasAttachments:true Subject:'ATTACHMENT TEST' Kind:email";
// Find the first email message in the Inbox that has attachments.
// This results in a FindItem operation call to EWS.
FindItemsResults<Item> results = service.FindItems(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, querystring, view);
//FindItemsResults<Item> results = service.FindItems(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, new ItemView(50));
if (results.TotalCount > 0)
// looping through all the emails
for (Int16 iDx = 0; iDx < results.TotalCount-1; iDx++)
EmailMessage email = results.Items[iDx] as EmailMessage;
if (email.IsRead == false) {
// Request all the attachments on the email message. This results in a GetItem operation call to EWS.
email.Load(new PropertySet(EmailMessageSchema.Attachments));
foreach (Attachment attachment in email.Attachments)
if (attachment is FileAttachment)
FileAttachment fileAttachment = attachment as FileAttachment;
What I am supposed to be doing is reading all the unread emails in the target inbox (only one Exchange server) and taking the attachments on disk so I can then add them as attachments as new cases on SalesForce.
Where am I going wrong?
Also, this line:
ItemView view = new ItemView(100);
was:
ItemView view = new ItemView(1);
Surely that will only look for one email item, right?thanks, do you know why I would be getting an error message like 'The specified object was not found in the store'
here is my code:
ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = CertificateValidationCallBack;
ExchangeService service = new ExchangeService(ExchangeVersion.Exchange2010_SP2);// .Exchange2007_SP1);
service.Url = new Uri("https://sgexc.bocuk.local/EWS/Exchange.asmx");
//creates an object that will represent the desired mailbox
Mailbox mb = new Mailbox(@"[email protected]");
//creates a folder object that will point to inbox folder
FolderId fid = new FolderId(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, mb);
//this will bind the mailbox you're looking for using your service instance
Folder inbox = Folder.Bind(service, fid);
FindItemsResults<Item> findResults = service.FindItems(new FolderId(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, new Mailbox("[email protected]")),new ItemView(10));
it's happening on this line:
Folder inbox = Folder.Bind(service, fid);
and if I try to use AutoDiscoverURL then I just see my own inbox. -
Out of office replies in Exchange 2013 not working for external recipients
Hi,
Few days ago a couple of company workers went to vacation. They set up OOF automatic replies in OWA 2013. However automatic replies are not working for external recipients (outside of company). Internal users (company users) receive OOF notification.
I'm using smart host in sender connector configuration (SMTP server of internet provider) to deliver emails. Any clues about this problem ? Please find below part of the transaction log. For testing purposes i set up administrator account
to be on vacation.
HARED... SMTP
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
RECEIVE SMTP
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
DROP ROUTING
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
AGENT... AGENT [email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
HARED... SMTP
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
RECEIVE SMTP
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
AGENT... AGENT [email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
TRANSFER ROUTING [email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation test
FAIL SMTP
[email protected]
{[email protected]} Automatic reply: vacation testHi Informus,
Please check if it is allowed in AllowedOOFType of the Remote Domain *
In Exchange 2013, the only way to see or change the current configuration for automatic replying and forwarding to the Internet is via the Exchange Management Shell (EMS) with PowerShell commands.
To get the currently configured Remote Domains, use:
Get-RemoteDomain
Name DomainName
AllowedOOFType
Default *
External
Get-RemoteDomain Default | fl AllowedOOFType, AutoReplyEnabled, AutoForwardEnabled
AllowedOOFType : External
AutoReplyEnabled : False
AutoForwardEnabled : False
To change the settings, use the Set-RemoteDomain command.
Enable automatic replies
Set-RemoteDomain -AutoReplyEnabled $true
Enable automatic forwards
Set-RemoteDomain –AutoForwardEnabled $true
Enable OOF for Outlook 2003 and previous (for Exchange 2007 and 2010 support)
Set-RemoteDomain –AllowedOOFType $ExternalLegacy
To change all these properties at once, you can use:
Set-RemoteDomain Default -AutoReplyEnabled $true –AutoForwardEnabled $true –AllowedOOFType $ExternalLegacy
Note:
Valid settings for the AllowedOOFType property are:
External
This is the default and only allows for the new style OOF messages as introduced in Outlook 2007.
ExternalLegacy
This settings allows for both the new style and old style OOF messages and needs to be set if you want to enable external OOF support for Outlook 2003 as well.
None
This setting doesn’t allow for the use of OOF messages at all (both internal and external).
InternalLegacy
This setting only allows for internal OOF messages to be sent for all Outlook versions.
Regards,
Satyajit
Please “Vote As Helpful”
if you find my contribution useful or “Mark As Answer” if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you. -
Friends,
I have a requirment where a set of approvers approve a form and at the end of the process i store the form as a pdf in the contentspace.
My requirment is that, can we set roles/permission for the file that i store in the contentspace and allow only the people who have approved the form to view/edit the content the the contentspace.
If possible what is the workbench activity should i use and how should i use it in the process?
Thanks for your support
-Ashok DeivasigamaniThere is a read/write permissions service in the Content Services category in workbench that will allow you to control the access to the space or th efile that you write intp CS.
Paul -
How to disable Exchange 2013 Outlook Anywhere for internal Outlook client
Hello;
By default, Exchange 2013's Outlook Anywhere is enable for all user mailbox, if I disable the Outlook Anywhere per user mailbox, the user will not able to connect his Outlook client to Exchange 2013. What is the best method to disable the Outlook anywhere
on mailbox but let the Outlook 2013 still able access to Exchg server.
The initial idea is to prevent user from access to company Exchange server from ANYWHERE, we just want to open the Outlook Anywhere for the authorized user only. Looks like Microsoft did not think about the security.
thanks!Hello;
By default, Exchange 2013's Outlook Anywhere is enable for all user mailbox, if I disable the Outlook Anywhere per user mailbox, the user will not able to connect his Outlook client to Exchange 2013. What is the best method to disable the Outlook anywhere
on mailbox but let the Outlook 2013 still able access to Exchg server.
The initial idea is to prevent user from access to company Exchange server from ANYWHERE, we just want to open the Outlook Anywhere for the authorized user only. Looks like Microsoft did not think about the security.
thanks!
I don't understand your request. If you disabled Outlook Anywhere, Outlook will only be able to connect via IMAP or POP3.
If you want to disable this ability and allow some then perhaps use cas-mailbox to disable in bulk and then enable only those allowed:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125264(v=exchg.150).aspx
The MAPIBlockOutlookRpcHttp parameter enables or disables access to the mailbox by using Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP) in Microsoft Outlook.
Valid values for this parameter are:
$true Only Outlook clients that aren't configured to use Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP) are allowed to access the mailbox. By default, Outlook 2013 is configured to use Outlook Anywhere.
$false Outlook clients that are configured to use Outlook Anywhere (RPC over HTTP) are allowed to access the mailbox.
The default value is $false.
Twitter!:
Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. -
Exchange 2013 SP1: Fix for failing MSExchangeTransport service
We had a newly updated Exchange 2013 SP1 that would not start the Transport service
"Netstat -b" showed that a service was listening to port 25 on all IP's (0.0.0.0:25) and when the service could not get the port, it would die, and Exchange would attempt to restart it over and over.
After many tears, I found this solution:
Through the console or the ECP, check the Frontend receive connectors and find the one that is listening on 0.0.0.0:25, which is probably the Default Frontend Receive. Disable it.
Restart the MSExchangeTransport and MSExchangeTransportFrontEnd services.
If both services restart normally, troubleshooting is complete.
We use several custom connectors carried forward from the previous installation, which was SBS 2008. If this applies to you, take notice.Normally, the Default Frontend Receive Connector (0.0.0.0:25) is the messaging entry point for your organization (I am assuming that you have a single MBX/CAS server).
1. If you disable the Default Frontend Receive Connector (0.0.0.0:25), you block inbound email.
2. Most probably, the cause for your problem are the Custom Receive Connectors. Check their type, and if it is Hub Transport, delete and re-create them as Front End Receive connectors.
Step by Step Screencasts and Video Tutorials -
Exchange 2013 - Duplicate Binding for EWS
Hi there,
on our Exchange 2013 server we find that Outlook and OWA are both working fine. Mac users can't connect. This seems to be related to the following error [sorry for the Dutch language]:
Basically it complains that an endpoint is already bound to the URI.
WebHost failed to process a request.
Sender Information: System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/34026242
Exception: System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException: De service /EWS/exchange.asmx kan niet worden geactiveerd als gevolg van een uitzondering tijdens de compilatie. Het uitzonderingsbericht is: Er is reeds een bindingsexemplaar gekoppeld aan luister-URI
https://bilbo.ourdomain.loc:444/EWS/Exchange.asmx/http. Als twee eindpunten dezelfde LuisterURI willen delen, moeten ze ook hetzelfde bindingsobjectexemplaar delen. De twee conflicterende eindpunten zijn opgegeven in AddServiceEndpoint()-aanroepen, in een
configuratiebestand, of in een combinatie van AddServiceEndpoint() en configuratiebestand. . ---> System.InvalidOperationException: Er is reeds een bindingsexemplaar gekoppeld aan luister-URI https://bilbo.ourdomain.loc:444/EWS/Exchange.asmx/http. Als twee
eindpunten dezelfde LuisterURI willen delen, moeten ze ook hetzelfde bindingsobjectexemplaar delen. De twee conflicterende eindpunten zijn opgegeven in AddServiceEndpoint()-aanroepen, in een configuratiebestand, of in een combinatie van AddServiceEndpoint()
en configuratiebestand.
bij System.ServiceModel.Description.DispatcherBuilder.InitializeServiceHost(ServiceDescription description, ServiceHostBase serviceHost)
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostBase.InitializeRuntime()
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostBase.OnOpen(TimeSpan timeout)
bij System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open(TimeSpan timeout)
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.ActivateService(ServiceActivationInfo serviceActivationInfo, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity)
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity)
--- Einde van intern uitzonderingsstackpad ---
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.HostingManager.EnsureServiceAvailable(String normalizedVirtualPath, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity)
bij System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment.EnsureServiceAvailableFast(String relativeVirtualPath, EventTraceActivity eventTraceActivity)
Process Name: w3wp
Process ID: 8320
The IIS Manager has two sites ('Default Web Site', 'Exchange Back End').
For the Default Site only the bindings *:80, *:443, 127.0.0.1:80, 127.0.0.1:443 are enabled.
For the Exchange Back End only the bindings *:81, *:444 are enabled
There are no other sites.
I have tried searching the config files by doing:
PS C:\inetpub> Get-ChildItem . -include *.config -rec | select-string -pattern "444"
This does give files under C:\inetpub\history and C:\inetpub\temp but I don't know [given the history/temp] names if I should look further here.
I have also looked at
PS C:\windows\system32\inetsrv> Get-ChildItem . -include *.config -rec | select-string -pattern "444"
This returns only a single line in config\applicationHost.config which matches what I see in the IIS Manager GUI.
Where else can I search to find the duplicate binding?
EljakimOkay, after a couple of nights of trouble shooting I found the solution.
In the web.config file under Exchange\ClientAccess\exchweb\ews somehow the following information had appeared:
<services>
<service name="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.EWSService" behaviorConfiguration="EWSServiceBehavior">
<!-- For streamed transfer mode, we need a different endpoint address with /s/. -->
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="webHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSStreamingNegotiateHttpBinding" name="Https" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSStreamingContract" />
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="webHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSStreamingNegotiateHttpsBinding" name="Http" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSStreamingContract" />
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSAnonymousHttpBinding" name="Https" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" />
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSAnonymousHttpsBinding" name="Http" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" />
<endpoint binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSWSSecurityHttpBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" address="http" />
<endpoint binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSWSSecurityHttpsBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" address="http" />
</service>
<service name="Microsoft.Exchange.UM.ClientAccess.UMWebService" behaviorConfiguration="UMServiceBehavior">
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="UMLegacyHttpBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IUM12LegacyContract" />
<endpoint address="http" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="UMLegacyHttpsBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IUM12LegacyContract" />
</service>
</services>
The endpoint addresses are wrong in this file. I compared the endpoints to a config on another server and fixed the issue by changing the services to:
<services>
<service name="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.EWSService" behaviorConfiguration="EWSServiceBehavior">
<!-- For streamed transfer mode, we need a different endpoint address with /s/. -->
<endpoint address="s" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="webHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSStreamingNegotiateHttpsBinding" name="Https" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSStreamingContract"/>
<endpoint address="s" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="webHttpBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSStreamingNegotiateHttpBinding" name="Http" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSStreamingContract"/>
<endpoint address="" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSAnonymousHttpsBinding" name="Https" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract"/>
<endpoint address="" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSAnonymousHttpBinding" name="Http" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract"/>
<endpoint binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSWSSecurityHttpBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" address="wssecurity"/>
<endpoint binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="EWSWSSecurityHttpsBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IEWSContract" address="wssecurity"/>
</service>
<service name="Microsoft.Exchange.UM.ClientAccess.UMWebService" behaviorConfiguration="UMServiceBehavior">
<endpoint address="" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="UMLegacyHttpsBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IUM12LegacyContract"/>
<endpoint address="" behaviorConfiguration="MultiReceive" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="UMLegacyHttpBinding" contract="Microsoft.Exchange.Services.Wcf.IUM12LegacyContract"/>
</service>
</services> -
[SOLVED] setting up permissions for mounted usb devices
Hi all,
I've been having the following problem when mounting my external hd: in order to mount the external hd I created a folder /mnt/usbstick/ giving permissions to a non-root user to read the files/directories in this folder (using chmod); however, after I mount the external hd, the set of permissions for /mnt/usbstick/ change so that a non-root user cannot read the mounted files in /mnt/usbstick. This is a problem for me because, when I copy a file from the external hd to the non-root home folder, the copied file can only be read by the root user.
Do you know how I can solve this problem? Should I write a udev rule and place it at /etc/udev/rules.d/? Or should I simply add the non-root user to a specific group from /etc/group? Any ideas?
Thanks!
Last edited by falsum (2010-05-08 09:21:59)You could try adding an entry for your usb device in /etc/fstab and specify the option user to let non-superusers mount it.
Here's an example of an entry for my external HD. I'm sure there are probably other (and better) ways to do this but it works for me.
UUID=4376-0BFB /media/FIRELITE vfat rw,user,noauto,async 0 0
Nice howto found on the wiki: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fstab -
Exchange 2013 Tasks Permissions
Hi guys,
I have a user and she has multiple users mailboxes setup on her outlook but she does not want to see the users task and only have access to the mailbox and calendar is there any powershell command that I can use to setup these permissions ?Hi ,
Based on my knowledge mailbox folder permissions will not get inherited .
Please use the below mentioned command to add the specific folder permissions on the target mailbox for the first time .
add-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity "[email protected]:\inbox" -User "[email protected]" -AccessRights owner
In case if you wanted to edit the provided permissions on the target mailbox folders then we need to use the command set-MailboxFolderPermission instead of add-MailboxFolderPermission .
Below is the example to change the previously provided permission.
set-MailboxFolderPermission -Identity "[email protected]:\inbox" -User "[email protected]" -AccessRights author
On the first command i am giving the mailbox folder permission as owner over the target mailbox "[email protected]" for the user [email protected] by using the command add-MailboxFolderPermission
But on the second command i am changing the mailbox folder permission as author over the target mailbox "[email protected]" for the user [email protected] by using the command set-MailboxFolderPermission
Please reply me if you have any queries.
Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham -
Exchange 2013 delivery reports for mail enabled public folder
How can I get delivery reports for mail enabled public folders? Would I search the related public folder mailbox?
Hi,
When you track messages using Delivery Reports, you can only choose user mailbox when you select mailbox to search. Under the option "Mailbox to search", there is no mail-enabled public folder listed there for you to select from
the address book.
But you can search messages sent to or received from mail-enabled public folder.
Track messages with delivery reports
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-GB/library/jj150554(v=exchg.150).aspx
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support
Maybe you are looking for
-
Logic Crashes trying to open a session file. Save copies often
I am having an unfortunate unique issue here. For whatever reason, Logic X has corrupted/infected several session files within my project. I have not been able to open my main or many backup session files within a project. Every time I open, crash an
-
Oracle Developer 6i XML Publisher emsg:was terminated by signal 11
Hi there I have a XML Publisher report (Data Model in Developer 6i) which run fines for most of the record I tested, but for One record this record shows the following ERROR. Any body has Idea* ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ERROR+++++++++++
-
Preview Printing coming out white on Black
Some of my PDF are printing out white letters on black background. How can i correct this? thanks
-
Macbook Pro Boot Problems NEED HELP!
Hello I have a macbook pro that was dual booted with a verision of ubuntu called Jolicloud and Mac OS x yesterday when I deleted the Jolicloud partition from my harddrive the grub bootloaded took over and now will not let me access my mac files. upon
-
Grey Screen/ Defaulting to Windows
I have a first-generation Mac Pro 1.1 with the latest boot ROM (MP11.005C.B08) and SMC Version (1.7f10), 6GB of RAM w/ OS X 10.5.4 installed and Windows XP Pro installed on its own internal drive under Boot Camp. Although I have the Macintosh HD sele