Exchange rante

Dear All,
In spro OB08 is the exchange rate maintenance in spa Eassy access what is the tcode for entrying exchange rante.
plguide me,
Girija

Hi
OB64 = Define Max Exchange Rate Difference
Customizing Exchange Rates = IMG -> General Settings -> Currencies - Various
F.05 = Foreign Currency Open Item Valuation
This Information may be useful to u.
Thanks & Regards

Similar Messages

Why should we queue?

Hello Architects and Software enginners,
I think things that may be needed in a specific scenario, may not be crucial in another scenario, in other words I don't believe a common solution exists for all situations.
So here is my scenario and my question is do I need to use the queing mechanism in this case? We have an Oracle EBS 11.5.10 with DB 10.2.0.1 system.
We have to exchange cXML documents with a vendor. For outbound, we need to transform table data to a cXML document and send it to the vendor via https. For inbound, we need to get cXML docs from the vendor via https and create a flat file in our system to load to our EBS interface tables. All this will be done in bacth/asynchronous mode.
For outbound, the data is already in the EBS tables. Why can't I loop through to get the records, create the cXML documents (say using XML DB) and use utl_http to post to the vendor on the fly per schedule say 10 times a day? Another option would be when the records are created I can create the cXML and store in a temporary table as a clob and then post to vendor as per schedule. Why do I need to use queing, because queuing seems to do the same thing-store in a queue table, dequeue it from there and and process it?
Similarly for inbound why can't I get the cXML from the vendor, store it in a temp table as a clob and extract the text and create my file? Why should I use queueing? It just seems to be additional processing.
As you can see it is a very basic question so let the opinions, ideas, critiques, disagreements flow :-)
I highly appreciate your input as it will help determine how we architect our solution.
Thanks
Sandeep
Edited by: user11992646 on Feb 20, 2010 1:00 PM

Hi Damorgan,
Appreciate it very much you taking the time to reply...on a weekend!. As a technologist I understand your point. But as business customers we have to look out for our best interests, so based on business realities I will disagree with some of your statements. I don't want to deviate from learning from you on the needs of AQ for this project. I wish we had met at the openworld so that we could have exchanged rants face to face, your EBS colleagues were targets of mine :-)
Now to your question. AQ is for real-time not batches. ...If you are going to batch it ... AQ is more technology than you need.
How is AQ real time? I am not trying to argue here, just trying to understand please bear with me and correct me if I am wrong. If you are queuing something, it means that you want to do something later,how many milliseconds afterwards that may be. I thought that was the whole point of queing so that users can continue doing what they are doing and leave the intensive processing to be done later without waiting online. Isn't this simply a batch that runs more often? A listener may be listening, wakes up every once in a while and processes the messages in batch-Again I don't know how this works but I am anticipating soemthing like this happens, please correct me. If there are disparate messages coming from many systems, queing makes sense in an EAI architecture. But in a point-to-point, as in this project, what is the point? :-)
Also, can I queue up cXML type of messages in clobs? I read somewhere that only native Oracle XML can be queued up in AQ. An example of cXML is below.
I would recommend that if your organization wishes to be competitive. And if you wish to have skills that are competitive in the marketplace you (your organization) start taking this technology seriously. Patch to 10.2.0.4 immediately and upgrade to 11.1.0.7 by August. Then throw away the antiquated batch mode model, use AQ, and communicate with your vendors in a more timely and efficient manner.
I would agree doing away with the batch if I understand AQ better. From what I read, I have explained my understanding of AQ earlier. We have had regular issues with EBS Workflow queueing mechanisms for e-mail notifications where things get piled up for no apparent reason and when we open an SR the inevitable result is "rebuild the queue, bounce Apache, bounce concurrent managers etc..." with no real resolution which is causing me to hesitate using AQ for financial documents.
Also, we will be upgrading to 11 soon but not soon enough for this project
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE cXML SYSTEM "http://xml.cXML.org/schemas/cXML/1.2.021/Fulfill.dtd">
<cXML payloadID="[email protected]"
xml:lang="en-CA" timestamp="2000-10-14T08:39:29-08:00">
<Header>
<From>
<Credential domain="DUNS">
<Identity>942888711</Identity>
</Credential>
</From>
<To>

<Credential domain="Networkuserid" type="marketplace">
<Identity>[email protected]</Identity>
</Credential>
<Credential domain="NetworkUserId">
<Identity>[email protected]</Identity>
</Credential>
</To>
<Sender>

<Credential domain="DUNS">
<Identity>942888711</Identity>
<SharedSecret>coyote</SharedSecret>
</Credential>
<UserAgent>Workchairs Order Entry</UserAgent>
</Sender>
</Header>
<Request deploymentMode="test">
<ShipNoticeRequest>
<ShipNoticeHeader shipmentID="S89823-123" noticeDate="2000-10-14T23:59:20-08:00"
shipmentDate="2000-10-14T08:30:19-08:00"
deliveryDate="2000-10-18T09:00:00-08:00">
<Contact role="shipFrom">
<Name xml:lang="en-CA">Workchairs, Vancouver</Name>
<PostalAddress>
<Street>432 Lake Drive</Street>
<City>Vancouver</City>
<State>BC</State>
<PostalCode>B3C 2G4</PostalCode>
<Country isoCountryCode="CA">Canada</Country>
</PostalAddress>
</Contact>
<Comments xml:lang="en-CA">Got it all into one shipment.
</Comments>
</ShipNoticeHeader>
<ShipControl>
<CarrierIdentifier domain="SCAC">UPS</CarrierIdentifier>
<CarrierIdentifier domain="companyName">United Parcel Service
</CarrierIdentifier>
<ShipmentIdentifier>8202 8261 1194</ShipmentIdentifier>
</ShipControl>
</ShipNoticeRequest>
</Request>
</cXML>

Return or exchange Galaxy S3 and keep unlimited data?

I have preordered a Galaxy S3 and it's been shipped already, should be delivered on Monday. After finding out about the encrypted bootloader on this phone I'm not sure I want it anymore (I'll save that rant for somewhere else). If I return the device will I keep my unlimited data? I ordered it prior to June 28th. I've read conflicting info about restocking fees. Do I need to refuse delivery from Fedex or can I accept delivery and go through normal return methods without being charged a fee? Paying $35 to return a phone that's still in its shrink wrap seems ridiculous.
I'm also trying to decide whether I'd prefer a Galaxy Nexus. I know that if I return the S3 and then try to re-use my upgrade, I'll lose unlimited data. Is there a way for me to do a direct exchange of one device for the other, so that I'm not technically cancelling one upgrade and re-using it?

I would just refuse delivery if you don't want the phone. If you
return this phone your upgrade will fall under the new upgrade after June 28,
2012 and as such you will have to move to the new plans when you upgrade at
subsidized prices. You do have the right to return for exchange I was told by VZW rep
but then again your mileage may vary as to what you do. It is not a set thing and no one
at VZW will always to the samething in all locations. Again buyer beware. The last phone I
returned by just not accepting delivery which was just late last year VZW
charged the restocking fee but I mentioned to the person I called that it was
still not opened. They said the phone
still had to go back as an opened phone as they had to open the package to make
sure everything was in the box as the shrink wrap could have been re-shrunk by
someone else in shipping. They told me
they did not take any returns without an inspection of the contents. I hope your mileage will vary with your
return. Once they go back they go to
refurbished phones? I have been seeing
people complain they are getting new phones with no battery cover and VZW tells
them to return them which I am sure VZW will charge the re-stocking fee
anyway. These issues are why I don’t
order phones off the web site. I only
purchase from a VZW store.

IPhone 3G doesn't sync with Outlook calendar using Exchange

First, let me just say I don't need push email, push contacts or push calendar. I just want my iPhone to sync with my existing Outlook 2007 setup like any other PDA would via ActiveSync, without having to rely on iPhone Enterprise Integration.
There are lots of articles in the knowledge-base and forum that describe how to overcome corruption of PST files, but if you're connecting to an Exchange server you'll notice that you might not even have a PST file. Outlook uses OST files for off-line cache instead and creating a PST as your default storage will cause all of the Exchange content to be delivered to your computer and erased from the server. (not good)
I've looked over all the support articles I could find, tried innumerable variations of install / re-install / disable Outlook plug-ins / start with brand new user attempts to no avail. I still have not found a way around this issue.
I know this is possible because my previous phone (a Treo700w) was able to sync contacts and my calendar without any issues and I naturally expected my iPhone to have *at least* the same capabilities.
Feels like a major design flaw for business users. Now I'm stuck with a super slick phone that doesn't do the number 1 thing I need it to do: sync with my Outlook calendar. Sorry for the rant.
Anyone else having an issue with this? As far as I can tell there's no solution posted for it.

MeatX2, I had read that article already. It describes how to overcome corrupt PST files which doesn't apply in my case.
My primary Outlook file is an OST (off-line cache) and my contacts / calendar are stored on an Exchange server. I could create a PST file and set it as the default storage, but that would cause all of my data to be delivered directly to my Outlook and erased from the server (where it is currently backed up and available from multiple computers, my desktop, laptop, etc).
Doesn't seem like Apple has a solution for syncing from OST files like other PDAs do. The only alternative seems to be their Enterprise Integration product which (despite doing cool things like push email, contacts and calendar) isn't something an end-user can install.
I just need iTunes to sync with my Outlook in the same way my old PDA did. Seems a little absurd that Apple would pitch Outlook sync capabilities and miss such a significant use-case completely.
But thanks for the reply anyway...

Error connecting to the Exchange Management Shell - and no one can connect w/ Outlook or OWA

Whew - I'm not sure what's happening but everything blew up this morning when another admin rebooted the server...
I can't connect to the Exchange Management shell - I get this:
[<servername>.<domainname>.local] Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : WS-Management cannot process the request. The operation failed because of an HTTP error. The HTTP error (12152) is: The server returned
an invalid or unrecognized response . For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic. + CategoryInfo          : OpenError: (System.Manageme....RemoteRunspace:RemoteRunspace) [], PSRemotingTransportException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : PSSessionOpenFailed
And in digging around, re-running the sharepoint PSConfig appeard to be a fix for a related issue I was reading about, and since there didn't seemt to be any harm in running it again (I did find the technote and had manually ran it after SP1 was installed)
I ran it and this is an excerpt from the log:
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                      Entering function Farm.Clear
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                        Entering function CentralAdminServiceInstance.Reset
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                        Leaving function CentralAdminServiceInstance.Reset
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                      Leaving function Farm.Clear
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                    Leaving function Farm.TryIsJoinedToFarm
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 ERR                    A failure has been encountered when trying to load the Farm
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                    Entering function StringResourceManager.GetResourceString
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                      Resource id to be retrieved is FarmIsJoinedFailureWhileUsingCommandLine for language English
(United States)
09/08/2011 16:48:05 1 INF                      Resource retrieved id FarmIsJoinedFailureWhileUsingCommandLine is Failed to detect if this
server is joined to a server farm. Possible reasons for this failure could be that you no longer have the appropriate permissions to the server farm, the database server hosting the server farm is unresponsive, the configuration database is inaccessible
or this server has been removed from the server farm. To diagnose this problem further, review the extended error information located at {0}. If this problem persists, run this wizard again to disconnect from the server farm. After disconnecting,
run the wizard again to create or connect to an existing server farm.
So I seem to have some massive permissions issues. Is there any kind of a technote or walkthrough that can step me through verifying what permissions should be where? The connect to Internet Wizard won't complete complaining it can't configure
the email and to run it again. That caused the Set Up your Internet Address wizard to not run, complaining you have to run the connect to Internet wizard.

Is there any update on the issue?
No. I gave up and rebuilt the server - this time inside of HyperV!
It's definetly a problem of some sort of a problem with IIS, that much is obvious. It's frustrating, because by not being able to get to the Exchange Management Shell it made recovery of the Exchange database VERY hard.
The rest of this will be a bit of a rant so feel free to stop reading here if you like :)
I'm pretty unhappy with the fragility of recovering an Exchange databas in general - there is a VERY narrow range of parameters to get mail back - and very many things that can prevent you from recovering. Had I suspected that there would have been
1/10th the pain in recovering mail, before I tried to connect the clients to the new exchange I would have made .PST files for everyone - which would have worked since they all had cached .OST files, even if the clients couldn't talk to Exchange due to the
aformentioned IIS problems. Anyway, it was a total nightmare, extremly frustrating and while many of my problems were probalby self-induced, the total lack of a coherant disaster recovery strategy has at least motivated me to be EXTREMLY diligent about
backups - and not just backups, but ensuring that the SBS backup is working and occasionally firing up a clone VM and doing a restore to ensure the one of two ways Exchange can be successfully backed up are indeed working.
With such an extreme dependence on IIS for client acces AND managemet of Exchange, there really, REALLY needs to be more documentation on how Exchange uses IIS, how to step through the registry and other low-level internals to troubleshoot and compare.
I must have read just about every technet article and literallly hundreds of blog entries on recovering Exchange - but the lack of information about Exchange's integration and dependancies on IIS were the most frustrating of all. Talk about putting all
your eggs in one basket and a huge single point of failure ticking time bomb!
And I think it was either SharePoint Express or an accidently applied SharePoint Express update that blew up IIS. A few days after that update got applied the server was restarted, and that's when everything went completly sideways. That's whats
even more frustrating - that so many applications are so dependant on a now essential layer is frustrating. I realize SBS is an exception to the rule - generally Exchange is installed on it's own server and this isn't a remote possiblity, but any update
(or installer) that messes with IIS really needs to check the environment it's going to go into, and if there is anything at all that could possibly cause a compatibility issue, the update should "fail open" and not install wtihout explicit confirmation
from the admin that he wants to isntall it. Then again, another admin either ran the installer or approved the SP Express update so that still may not have saved me - but if he saw an explicit warning he probably would not have just clicked through
it!
Oh well - thanks for reading if you went all the way through. I'm just glad that it's now over :)

E75 Mail for Exchange - absolutely useless

Hi all,
This is a rant, a big one.
I have been a loyal Nokia user since I was 18 (I'm in my mid 30's now). The nature of my work denoted that it was time to get myself a 'push-mail' phone so when my contract was up with Optus. I opted for the E75. I contemplated a Blackberry (as this is what most of my colleagues use) but being a loyal Nokia user and comfortable with their menus, I thought I would try this new phone. After all, there had been a massive advertising blitz throughout the Australian print media, online and television spruiking the qualities of this phone, specifically it being an "email on your mobile" type of handset. This was about a month and a half ago.
As our IT guy at work was on leave I set the E75 up with my gmail account (and just set work email on autoforward to gmail). It worked like a dream for about three days when it suddenly dropped out. The following day email worked fine ...then dropped out ....then worked fine ...then dropped out for two days. This pattern continued for a week (despite my reconfiguring the settings in-line with advice from both Nokia and Optus technicians AND performing hard resets). In short, the 'email' software on the E75 just plain DOES NOT WORK.
I returned the handset to the store where I got it from and they exchanged it for a new E75. Exactly the same problems as before. I experimented with setting it up with different types of email (hotmail, yahoo, work etc) and the same thing happened. Email would work fine and dandy for a couple of days then it would drop out for half a day or more. The nature of my work denotes that if I put my email address out there and tell colleagues they can get me on my phone, then my phone better work. As such, I stopped giving people the expectation that they could email me on my mobile and to simply call me or SMS me if they needed me.
I have now sought to have this handset returned and am trying to switch my contract over to a Blackberry. The guys at the store where I contracted with Optus have been pretty helpful as they themselves have had numerous problems with the E75 and angry customers. The Optus business managers themselves are apparently refusing to budge on this and as of this afternoon were saying they would not offer me an exchange (even if it meant I would contract for a more expensive phone, ie more money for them).
As such, I am considering my options.
*To lodge a complaint through a dispute resolution/consumer protection body like the NSW Dept of Fair Trading.
Ifyou have been supplied with a faulty product, this body investigates the situation persuant to the NSW Fair Trading Act. It is a bit hard to achieve an actual resolution for yourself here, you simply make a lot of trouble for the other side.
*To file a claim in the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal.
Decisions here are binding. You would argue that you've been sold a dud product, the faults are easily demonstrable (google E75 email faults and your system will nearly crash due to all the results that come up). This is probably the best option for people without legal representation. It is quite an informal affair and 'equity' prevails usually.
*To file a claim in the NSW District Court against Optus for breach of contract.
I contracted for "email on my mobile" I didn't get that - there's a breach of a fundamental term. Basic common law contract law. There are no exclusion clauses or disclaimers that can negate such a fundamental breach. Nokia's extensive advertising and branding of this handset as an 'email phone' denote that if it is not fit for that purpose, then you have a breach of the contract. There's also a number of Fair Trading Act sections that are valid in the fitness for purpose respect.
*To file a claim in the Federal Court against NOKIA for breaching s 71 of the Trade Practices Act
As the Trade Practices Act is a federal act, it may be worth an action directly against the manufacturer on the grounds of 'fitness for purpose'. Nokia advertised this phone as an 'email phone', the numerous discussions here denote that there have been so many faults with their email software that the phone is clearly not fit for the purpose of being an email phone, certainly not when it only works half the time.
*To file a claim in the Federal Court against NOKIA for breaching s 52 of the Trade Practices Act
Here we are talking about 'Misleading and Deceptive Conduct'. On other discussion threads dealing with the E75 email faults, some users from Europe have reprinted responses they received from Nokia technicians where they were blatantly told that the E75 is "not a mail for exchange" phone and that faults are to be expected as the software is still in development. Per the ambit of s 52, this is clearly conduct that is LIKELY to mislead or decieve especially when viewed in the light that Nokia have promoted this phone as "email on your mobile" (implying solid reliability) not "email on your mobile half the time cos it only works sparingly because we haven't nutted out the software yet."
That last one is a biggie. IF Nokia were still developing their mail for exchange software and they knew it had bugs and was not reliable (certainly not for business use) then they should not have misled consumers into believing that this phone was the "Blackberry Killer". Their advertisements on the back page of Sydney's 'Good Weekend' certainly fooled me into thinking it was. Of course, people say that I should simply just cough up another $40 of my own money and download RoadSync so I have a reliable mail for exchange program that actually works. This isn't the point. Nokia have put a very faulty product on the market, there seems to be a lot of disconnect between their marketing of the product and what their technicians say it is capable of. As such, I will be demanding a full and fair exchange of this handset with a Blackberry.
Bryan.

I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to do here.
Mail for Exchange - works with Microsoft Exchange Servers only.
It doesn't work with Yahoo! Gmail or any other mail service because its "Mail for EXCHANGE"
"Mail for Exchange is preintegated to Nokia E75, Nokia E72, Nokia E55, Nokia E52, Nokia N86 8MP and Nokia 6710 Navigator"
Taken from: http://europe.nokia.com/find-products/nokia-for-business/software/email-and-instant-messaging/mail-f...
In fact its more compatible with a pre-installed device such as the E75 than any of the other symbian devices that it will operate with.
The program uses the Microsoft Exchange Activesync service to push mail to your handset, this needs to be set up correctly by your companies IT department with the correct heartbeat intervals etc.
I have MfE working fine on my E71, whilst its not the same device the software works well and the push mail function is great.
I have had one or two problems, that the latest version of MfE has exhibited but there is a big thread here /discussions/board/message?board.id=messaging&thread.id=13370
Which details some problems and resolutions.
Shunts...
I will mostly be communicating with a Nokia E72 Zodium Black
Nokia E72-1 with Vr 051.018.207.04 Software
If this post helped... Add some kudos!!

Can I exchange the iPhone 5s for a different color?

My sister told me she bought me an iPhone 5s white/silver and verizon is having it shipped to me but the shipping info states it's the gold one. Is there a way to exchange/replace the phone for the silver/white colored one at no extra charge? It also already shipped around 2 hours ago.

If the phone you're getting isn't the phone that you want...and you want to try to avoid a restocking fee...just refuse the delivery. Don't accept it and try to go the store to have it done...especially if VZW got it right and you're just wanting a different color out of preference. Be advised that refusing the accept delivery of the phone will cause it to go back to VZW which you have to factor in time to ship it back, time for the warehouse to receive it, and time for it to be credited back to your sister. All of this can be a long and tedious process. Also be advised that if you do try this approach that calling, complaining, and ranting about the slow return process will not yield you any faster results. No VZW rep online, in a store, on the phone, or via chat will be able to do anything to speed up the return process...it'll happen when it happens. So...with that being said, is having a different color really worth it to you? Armed with the knowledge you've gained here about the process, at least you can now make an informed decision. Besides, most people cover the back of their device with some fancy or cute cover to protect their device so the back color is rarely seen. Best of luck to you...

WebOS Not Enforcing Exchange Hard PIN's, when will this be fixed.

I have searched for this using PIN and don't believe I've found the exact issue.
Rant:
I've had my Pre since about two weeks after release, part of the reason why I got it is because my company was going to allow the pre access to exchange, but it's been over 6 months and I'm sick of webmail.
The Problem: (from what my company has told me)
WebOS does NOT enforce a strong PIN requirement.
So basically even if this requirement is checked in exchange anyone with a Pre could simply set a PIN of 1111, 1234, 1212, or anything simple like this.
Because of this I can't use my phone to check my work email or calendar. I was told through my company that Palm was going to fix this by the end of the year, but now that has came and gone and I still do not have access.
I really do appreciate all the development and will enjoy video recording, but when will something as simple as this be fixed. I can't believe more people aren't complaining about this, but maybe it's just that some companies aren't aware that their employees can put in these simple PIN's, and haven't locked them out.
Thanks,
Rich
Post relates to: Pre p100eww (Sprint)

I don't see anywhere in the link you provided mentioning or detailing Hard PIN's.
Look at this
Removed incorrect link, see post 7 below or this link:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123484.aspx
Allow Common Patterns
The Allow Common Patterns setting is used to either enable or disable the use of common number patterns used in creating a PIN. By default, this setting is disabled and will not allow users to input the following number patterns in the following list:
Sequential numbers PIN values that consist completely of consecutive numbers. Examples of sequential numbers for a PIN are 1234 and 65432.
Repeated numbers PIN values that consist of repeated numbers. Examples of repeated numbers are 11111 and 22222.
Suffix of mailbox extension PIN values that consist of the suffix of your mailbox extension. If your mailbox extension is 36697, your PIN cannot be 669
From my understanding from what has been told to me from my company even if this is checked as default Pre (webos) users could just enter in 1111 for a password and it would work. Now maybe I have this wrong and webos can't break this rule and gain access, but regardless it does not enforce a hard PIN and therefor my company is blocking it.

Asking for I pad exchange

I have been received the new. I pad 64 gb wifi since 2 month ago and I'm interested to have it with 3G . Could apple accept the exchange with adding the different by cash?

Ack. You two....
Unless they have changed it, Apple does take trade-ins. I did it and upgraded from a 16 GB to 32 GB model of the iPad at the Apple Store in NY. So if you're in the US(and NY at least) they take trade-ins, or trade-ups...They actually like taking your money. So go ahead and call Apple if you'd like to see if they will upgrade you to the more pricier model.
varjak paw:
Same thing, different name. iPad 1 is no longer able to be bought. Why? It was discontinued by a newer model of the same device. The new iPad that was sold some 6 months ago can't be bought now. Why? Because it was discontinued by a newer model of the same device. Anyone who hasn't bought it in the last 30 days now own a discontinued model. Which kinda *****, since they discontinued that one faster than the iPad 2. Makes me kinda glad I'm not drinking the Apple punch and running out to get that hot new model on opening day. Other than Siri, which my co-workers use for laughs, I still have nothing to make me jump on the new iPad and its successor so far. I honestly think people need to wake up and see they can go a year or two on one device before they upgrade.
And with that. My rant is done. Good night all!

Error while Provisioning a user to Exchange:Configuration OIM 9.1 & JBOSS

Hi,
I am facing the below error while provisioning a user to Exchange. The Resource gets provisioned. But inside the resource, two tasks (Create User & Set Mailbox) are rejected. When i retry these tasks, the Resource status is set to Revoked in the Resource Profile of OIM. The AD Provisioning is working fine. There are 2 AD IT Resources here. Database is Oracle 10g.
Error:
2012-03-02 15:06:10,347 INFO [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[localhost].[xlWebApp]] action: LogonAction: User 'RWFLORENCIO' logged on in session 8B825B2D391A654D975CDC91FECB5E8E
2012-03-02 15:06:34,712 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETFULLNAME
2012-03-02 15:06:34,712 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.LogProfileUser
2012-03-02 15:06:34,721 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETMANAGER
2012-03-02 15:06:34,721 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.LogProfileUser
2012-03-02 15:07:00,233 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavri15-1iti
2012-03-02 15:07:00,233 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:07:00,233 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:07:55,208 INFO [STDOUT] Running IDMVALIDATION
2012-03-02 15:07:55,208 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.CustomApproval
2012-03-02 15:07:55,267 INFO [STDOUT] select USR_MANAGER_KEY from USR where USR_UDF_EMP_NO='540087'
2012-03-02 15:07:55,267 INFO [STDOUT] result : OK
2012-03-02 15:07:55,559 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETKEY
2012-03-02 15:07:55,559 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = java.lang.String
2012-03-02 15:07:55,559 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETIH1
2012-03-02 15:07:55,559 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.CustomApproval
2012-03-02 15:07:55,614 INFO [STDOUT] select USR_MANAGER_KEY from USR where USR_UDF_EMP_NO='540087'
2012-03-02 15:08:00,207 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavssb3-1itk
2012-03-02 15:08:00,207 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:08:00,207 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:08:16,901 INFO [STDOUT] Masuk exception
2012-03-02 15:08:16,988 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer] Useless invocation of remove() for stateless session bean
2012-03-02 15:08:17,000 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer] Useless invocation of remove() for stateless session bean
2012-03-02 15:08:17,016 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer] Useless invocation of remove() for stateless session bean
2012-03-02 15:08:17,030 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer] Useless invocation of remove() for stateless session bean
2012-03-02 15:08:17,046 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer] Useless invocation of remove() for stateless session bean
2012-03-02 15:08:17,304 INFO [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[localhost].[xlWebApp]] action: LogonAction: User 'XELSYSADM' logged on in session 8B825B2D391A654D975CDC91FECB5E8E
2012-03-02 15:09:00,192 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavu2lc-1itr
2012-03-02 15:09:00,192 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:09:00,193 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:09:16,525 INFO [STDOUT] Running TOLOWERCASE
2012-03-02 15:09:16,526 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = java.lang.String
2012-03-02 15:09:16,642 INFO [STDOUT] Running TOLOWERCASE
2012-03-02 15:09:16,643 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = java.lang.String
2012-03-02 15:09:17,139 INFO [STDOUT] Running CHECKCHILDOBJECT
2012-03-02 15:09:17,139 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.CheckEmptyChild
2012-03-02 15:09:17,217 INFO [STDOUT] Connected to IAM
2012-03-02 15:09:17,218 INFO [STDOUT] Query : select * from UD_EMAILOF join obi on obi.obi_key=UD_EMAILOF.obi_key join UD_MAILFOC on UD_MAILFOC.UD_EMAILOF_KEY=UD_EMAILOF.UD_EMAILOF_KEY where obi.req_key='44002'
2012-03-02 15:09:17,228 INFO [STDOUT] Total record : 1
2012-03-02 15:09:17,228 INFO [STDOUT] Is Admin not filled the child form ? FILLED
2012-03-02 15:09:17,231 INFO [STDOUT] Disconnected from IAM
2012-03-02 15:09:17,606 INFO [STDOUT] Running SETPROXYADDRESS
2012-03-02 15:09:17,607 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:17,622 INFO [STDOUT] SetProxyAddressForSubsidiary
2012-03-02 15:09:17,622 INFO [STDOUT] Running INSERTTOLOG
2012-03-02 15:09:17,623 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.LogProvisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:17,701 INFO [STDOUT] Query Log= insert into IDM_PROV_LOG values (sysdate,'Request for Email Account','RWFLORENCIO','rwflorencio','Set Proxy Address','FAILED','NO')
2012-03-02 15:09:18,870 INFO [STDOUT] Running CHANGEDOMAINUSER
2012-03-02 15:09:18,870 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = adir.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:18,945 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETDNUSERPLDT
2012-03-02 15:09:18,945 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:18,961 INFO [STDOUT] GetDN
2012-03-02 15:09:18,991 INFO [STDOUT] GETDN():CN=FLORENCIO\, Raul W.,OU=PLDT Non-Executives,OU=Test Area,DC=ISSecLAB,DC=NET
2012-03-02 15:09:18,991 INFO [STDOUT] Running ENABLEMAILBOXPLDT
2012-03-02 15:09:18,991 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:19,019 INFO [STDOUT] EnableMailbox
2012-03-02 15:09:19,020 INFO [STDOUT] user ssh ->Administrator
2012-03-02 15:09:50,426 INFO [STDOUT] error ->Could not connect for 30000 milliseconds
2012-03-02 15:09:51,428 INFO [STDOUT] Disconnected: 192.168.1.72. Press Enter to exit
2012-03-02 15:09:51,428 INFO [STDOUT] Running INSERTTOLOG
2012-03-02 15:09:51,428 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = gitidm.LogProvisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:51,502 INFO [STDOUT] Query Log= insert into IDM_PROV_LOG values (sysdate,'Request for Email Account','RWFLORENCIO','rwflorencio','Enable Mailbox','FAILED','Could not connect for 30000 milliseconds')
2012-03-02 15:09:53,940 INFO [STDOUT] Running SETMAILBOX
2012-03-02 15:09:53,940 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:09:53,959 INFO [STDOUT] userssh ->Administrator
2012-03-02 15:09:53,959 INFO [STDOUT] userid ->ISSECLAB\Administrator
2012-03-02 15:10:00,461 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavvd3h-1itu
2012-03-02 15:10:00,462 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:10:00,462 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:10:00,577 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavvd6p-1itv
2012-03-02 15:10:00,577 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:10:00,578 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:10:00,865 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation info user
2012-03-02 15:10:00,865 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation
2012-03-02 15:10:07,034 INFO [STDOUT] select usr.usr_key,usr.usr_password from usr left join GIT_AUTH_AD on GIT_AUTH_AD.usr_key=usr.usr_key where usr.usr_password != GIT_AUTH_AD.USR_PASSWORD
2012-03-02 15:10:25,353 INFO [STDOUT] Could not connect for 30000 milliseconds
2012-03-02 15:10:26,357 INFO [STDOUT] Disconnected: 192.168.1.72. Press Enter to exit
2012-03-02 15:11:00,222 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavwn7i-1itx
2012-03-02 15:11:00,223 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:11:00,223 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:11:51,773 DEBUG [org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.IdleRemover] run: IdleRemover notifying pools, interval: 450000
2012-03-02 15:12:00,219 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavxxi3-1itz
2012-03-02 15:12:00,220 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:12:00,220 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:13:00,229 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzavz7t1-1iu2
2012-03-02 15:13:00,229 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:13:00,229 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:14:00,192 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw0i2o-1iu5
2012-03-02 15:14:00,192 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:14:00,193 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:14:02,974 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:02,974 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:02,975 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:02,975 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:02,975 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:53,473 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:53,473 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:53,474 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:53,474 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:14:53,474 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:15:00,249 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw1sex-1iu7
2012-03-02 15:15:00,249 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:15:00,249 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:15:00,591 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation info user
2012-03-02 15:15:00,592 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation
2012-03-02 15:15:00,727 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw1ss0-1iu9
2012-03-02 15:15:00,727 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:15:00,728 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:15:06,711 INFO [STDOUT] select usr.usr_key,usr.usr_password from usr left join GIT_AUTH_AD on GIT_AUTH_AD.usr_key=usr.usr_key where usr.usr_password != GIT_AUTH_AD.USR_PASSWORD
2012-03-02 15:15:18,066 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:15:18,075 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:15:18,075 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:15:18,076 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:15:18,076 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:16:00,220 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw32os-1iub
2012-03-02 15:16:00,221 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:16:00,221 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:16:00,536 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:16:00,537 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:16:00,537 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:16:00,538 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:16:00,539 WARN [XELLERATE.WEBAPP] TimeZone is not set for the browser's machine.
2012-03-02 15:17:00,200 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw4cyw-1iud
2012-03-02 15:17:00,200 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:17:00,201 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:18:00,209 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw5n9t-1iuf
2012-03-02 15:18:00,210 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:18:00,210 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:19:00,211 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw6xkj-1iuh
2012-03-02 15:19:00,212 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:19:00,212 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:19:21,833 DEBUG [org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.IdleRemover] run: IdleRemover notifying pools, interval: 450000
2012-03-02 15:20:00,500 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw8838-1iuk
2012-03-02 15:20:00,501 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:20:00,501 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:20:00,673 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw8881-1iul
2012-03-02 15:20:00,674 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:20:00,674 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:20:00,930 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation info user
2012-03-02 15:20:00,931 INFO [ADAPTER.AUTH_AD] Start initiate reconciliation
2012-03-02 15:20:07,489 INFO [STDOUT] select usr.usr_key,usr.usr_password from usr left join GIT_AUTH_AD on GIT_AUTH_AD.usr_key=usr.usr_key where usr.usr_password != GIT_AUTH_AD.USR_PASSWORD
2012-03-02 15:21:00,306 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzaw9i8g-1iun
2012-03-02 15:21:00,306 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:21:00,306 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:22:00,281 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzawasih-1iup
2012-03-02 15:22:00,282 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:22:00,282 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:23:00,303 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Created new session ID: gzawc2tl-1iur
2012-03-02 15:23:00,304 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.StatefulSessionContainer] Using create method for session: public void com.thortech.xl.ejb.databeansimpl.tcDataBaseBean.ejbCreate() throws javax.ejb.CreateException
2012-03-02 15:23:00,304 DEBUG [org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory] seting invoker proxy binding for stateful session: stateful-unified-invoker
2012-03-02 15:23:27,310 INFO [STDOUT] Running CHANGEDOMAINUSER
2012-03-02 15:23:27,312 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = adir.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:23:27,413 INFO [STDOUT] Running GETDNUSERPLDT
2012-03-02 15:23:27,414 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:23:27,432 INFO [STDOUT] GetDN
2012-03-02 15:23:27,473 INFO [STDOUT] GETDN():CN=FLORENCIO\, Raul W.,OU=PLDT Non-Executives,OU=Test Area,DC=ISSecLAB,DC=NET
2012-03-02 15:23:27,473 INFO [STDOUT] Running ENABLEMAILBOXPLDT
2012-03-02 15:23:27,474 INFO [STDOUT] Target Class = email.Provisioning
2012-03-02 15:23:27,495 INFO [STDOUT] EnableMailbox
2012-03-02 15:23:27,496 INFO [STDOUT] user ssh ->Administrator
2012-03-02 15:23:55,851 WARN [org.jboss.tm.TransactionImpl] Transaction TransactionImpl:XidImpl[FormatId=257, GlobalId=oim1.isseclab.net/5544083, BranchQual=, localId=5544083] timed out. status=STATUS_ACTIVE
2012-03-02 15:23:55,874 WARN [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Trying to get the connection count : 0
2012-03-02 15:23:55,875 WARN [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Trying to get the connection count : 1
2012-03-02 15:23:55,876 WARN [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Trying to get the connection count : 2
2012-03-02 15:23:55,877 WARN [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Trying to get the connection count : 3
2012-03-02 15:23:55,878 WARN [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Trying to get the connection count : 4
2012-03-02 15:23:55,878 ERROR [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Class/Method: DirectDB/getConnection encounter some problems: Error while retrieving database connection.Please check for the follwoing
Database srever is running.
Datasource configuration settings are correct.
2012-03-02 15:23:55,878 ERROR [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Class/Method: tcDataBase/readPartialStatement encounter some problems: Got a null connection
java.sql.SQLException: Got a null connection
     at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataBase.readPartialStatement(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.cache.CacheUtil.getSetCachedQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.eventPostInsert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcScheduleItem.insertImplementation(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.attestation.AttestationEngine.attestTask(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.attestation.AttestationEngine.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.AttestationOperationsBean.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.AttestationOperationsSession.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1129.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.jboss.invocation.Invocation.performCall(Invocation.java:359)
     at org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:237)
     at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:158)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.java:169)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.CallValidationInterceptor.invoke(CallValidationInterceptor.java:63)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:121)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:350)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:181)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:168)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invoke(LogInterceptor.java:205)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.invoke(ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.java:138)
     at org.jboss.ejb.SessionContainer.internalInvoke(SessionContainer.java:648)
     at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:960)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor132.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker$MBeanServerAction.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:169)
     at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:118)
     at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invokeLocal(InvokerInterceptor.java:209)
     at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:195)
     at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:61)
     at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:70)
     at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInterceptor.java:112)
     at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:100)
     at $Proxy744.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Operations.AttestationOperationsClient.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1128.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.jbossLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at $Proxy785.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.schedule.tasks.tcTskSubmitAttestationRequets.execute(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.tasks.SchedulerBaseTask.run(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper$TaskExecutionAction.run(Unknown Source)
     at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.jbossLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper.execute(Unknown Source)
     at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:203)
     at org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:520)
2012-03-02 15:23:55,885 ERROR [XELLERATE.SERVER] Class/Method: tcDataObj/eventPreInsert encounter some problems: Data Access Error
com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSetException: Data Access Error
     at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataaccess.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataSet.executeQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.cache.CacheUtil.getSetCachedQuery(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.eventPostInsert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcTableDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcScheduleItem.insertImplementation(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.insert(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.dataobj.tcDataObj.save(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.attestation.AttestationEngine.attestTask(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.attestation.AttestationEngine.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.AttestationOperationsBean.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.AttestationOperationsSession.updateResponses(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1129.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.jboss.invocation.Invocation.performCall(Invocation.java:359)
     at org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:237)
     at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:158)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.java:169)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.CallValidationInterceptor.invoke(CallValidationInterceptor.java:63)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:121)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:350)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:181)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:168)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invoke(LogInterceptor.java:205)
     at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.invoke(ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.java:138)
     at org.jboss.ejb.SessionContainer.internalInvoke(SessionContainer.java:648)
     at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:960)
     at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor132.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
     at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
     at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker$MBeanServerAction.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:169)
     at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:118)
     at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invokeLocal(InvokerInterceptor.java:209)
     at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:195)
     at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:61)
     at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:70)
     at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInterceptor.java:112)
     at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:100)
Please help as its really urgent!

Hey guys! 2 days and no replies yet. please help me with this.

Cannot send email from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013

Hello Anyone,
Anyone can help? I've prepare MS Exchange 2013 already, for Migration MS Exchange 2007 and I got the issue.
My issue is I can't send email from Exchange 2007 to Exchagen 2013, but for Exchange 2013 can send email to Exchange 2007,
is my issue only internal email for external email both Exchange server is working fine.
Regards,
Eakkasak

Thanks for your reply, when I send email from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 I'm get the error message below.
Delivery is delayed to these recipients or distribution lists:
Eakkasak Buajan
Subject:
This message has not yet been delivered. Microsoft Exchange will continue to try delivering the message on your behalf.
Delivery of this message will be attempted until 8/29/2014 8:30:29 PM (GMT+07:00) Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta. Microsoft Exchange will notify you if the message can't be delivered by that time."
I'm already tick "Exchange server Authentication" in the Default Receive connector properties of Exchange 2013"
I'm restart services and restart all Exchange Server but doesn't work.
Thanks,
Eakkasak
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007

Cannot send email from Exchange 2007 to Exchange 2013 - Coexistence

Existing Exchange 2007 SP3 1 MBX, 2 CAS/HT, 2 ET servers.
I have added an Exchange 2013 server with MBX/CAS role.
Email will flow from Ex2013 server no problem. Mail from Ex2007 systems cannot deliver to Ex2013 boxes, it dies in queue with a 4.4.7 expired message after issuing a delay message.
I can telnet to ports 25, 587,717,465,475, and 2525 from Ex2007 HT role to new Exchange 2013 server. I can send email from Ex2007 HT role server to new Exchange 2013 server using telnet to port 25.
A ‘get-mailbox’ from the Ex2007 HT role server returns the server and database properly on the test users on Exchange 2013 server.
The only strange thing I am seeing is from the Ex2007 systems, a ‘get-exchange server’ command shows the new Ex2013 server as role ‘16439’ which looks to perhaps be normal.
Why is email not flowing to the new users on Exchange 2013?

You should have exchange server authentication ticked in Default Receive connector in Exchange2007.
Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2013 in the same subnet/network. if not please check any spam agent running between the networks. Are you running antispam on Exchange2013 ?
MAS

Exchange/Return Y50

I bought a lenovo y50 (8gb ram l, i7 4710, 4Gb nvdia gtx860m)
18 days ago (15 april,2015) and now i got to know that a new version of y50 is soon releasing with a better graphics card that is nvdia gtx 970m frm the older one which is 860m.
what i want to know is that can i return my laptop so that i can buy the new one or can i get an exchange offer for that new upcoming laptop ? please help me . its only 18days

Hi swarandrose,
Welcome to Lenovo Community Forums!
I don't think that this is possible,
Best way to get some information about this is to call Lenovo Post sales team.
Try calling Lenovo Sales team and ask for options.
Hope this helps
Cheers!
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

IPhone Deletes Exchange Emails To Wrong Folder

Hello all!
I have a Microsoft Exchange mail account setup on my iPhone 4 (iOS 6.1) which works wonderfully, short of one aspect: Emails deleted from my phone do not go to the accounts standard 'Trash' folder, but to a different 'Deleted' folder. I can see no way to change this setting. Any ideas?

Thanks Templeton. This is the only definitive answer I've found anywhere. Turns out my iPhone was correct and my other email clients are sending to the wrong folder!

Exchange email will not sync

Re: Iphone 4; I have two email accounts on Exchange: Gmail and a work email.
For the past week my phone will not push the new emails to my phone. I have it where I fetch my emails manually. I'm getting the spinning wheel of death and it says "Checking for mail", but the emails will not show up.
Something seems to be sucking the battery life out of my phone. (Is this related?)
What I have done: Reset the phone; deleted the email account and added it back on. Nothing seems to work.
Everything else on my phone seems to be working fine.
Jenn

Hi,
Please check if this issue affects all activesync users. If only one user is affected, please check if this user is in quarantine list.
And you can enable the ActiveSync Mailbox Logging and then check if there is any related information.
Exchange ActiveSync Mailbox Logging
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jasonsla/archive/2013/03/19/exchange-activesync-mailbox-logging.aspx
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Exchange rante

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for