Exchange Server 2010 and Iphone Version 4s or 5S, HTML Rendering on Iphone

We have Exchange Server 2010 and using Iphone to receive and Send emails,
When HTML based emails are opened from Iphone, The email just shows the text and not the HTML
So the HTML is not rendered on IPhone, if the same email is FORWARDED from Outlook and opened on Iphone HTML is rendered correctly.

You either restart or reset your phone and the issue should resolve.

Similar Messages

  • Exchange Server 2010 and BlackBerry Q10

    I would like to connect Blackberry Q10 phones to our mail server. The server is a SBS 2010 and it already uses PPTP vpn.
    I would prefer using VPN, rather than a forwarded ports for the services.
    The phone doesn't support PPTP, and it has errors when using IMAP.
    The phone supports Microsoft IKEv2 VPN, that would be the best solution but i cannot make it work. 
    The phone connects perfectly on corporate WiFi when using Exchange ActiveSync connection settings.
    Can you help me with some guidance? How can I set up an IKE2 VPN or how can i put ActiveSync, or POP3 ports safely on the web? And if it's POP3 then, how can I configure it, so the mails are remaining on server?
    Thank you for your help!

    If you have the phone accepting ActiveSync internally, you have half the battle.  Now you need to proxy your CAS to the Internet (only need port 443 for this) and you will be set.  Read the following page and its subpages for the details of ActiveSync
    and what you need to do to enable it externally: 
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124396(v=exchg.141).aspx

  • Trouble Connecting iPad and iPhone to Exchange Server 2010

    Exchange Server 2010.
    I have found some online instructions for connecting iPhones and iPods (or iPads) to Exchange Server 2010 using activesync.  I enter all the information as I understand it (the same info used to successful connect Droids), and I do not get an error
    until I try to sync (retrieve mail) the first time.  Then it says, "The connection to the server failed."
    In the instructions I follwed it has this statement, "Before we get started, please be sure your administartor has purchased you an Activesync license and assigned to
    your email address."  What the heck does this mean and how can I accomplish it?  I know activesync is working.  So why do I need a "license"? 
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Doug Pruiett Good News Jail & Prison Ministry Richmond, Virginia www.goodnewsjail.org

    When I tested with the Microsoft Remote Connectivity Tester, it failed on the last step:
    ExRCA is testing Exchange ActiveSync.
    The Exchange ActiveSync test failed.
    Test Steps
    Attempting to resolve the host name mail.goodnewsjail.org in DNS.
    The host name resolved successfully.
    Additional Details
    IP addresses returned: 74.94.213.106
    Testing TCP port 443 on host mail.goodnewsjail.org to ensure it's listening and open.
    The port was opened successfully.
    Testing the SSL certificate to make sure it's valid.
    The certificate passed all validation requirements.
    Test Steps
    ExRCA is attempting to obtain the SSL certificate from remote server mail.goodnewsjail.org on port 443.
    ExRCA successfully obtained the remote SSL certificate.
    Additional Details
    Remote Certificate Subject: CN=mail.goodnewsjail.org, OU=Domain Control Validated, Issuer: SERIALNUMBER=07969287, CN=Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority, OU=http://certificates.godaddy.com/repository, O="GoDaddy.com, Inc.", L=Scottsdale, S=Arizona,
    C=US.
    Validating the certificate name.
    The certificate name was validated successfully.
    Additional Details
    Host name mail.goodnewsjail.org was found in the Certificate Subject Common name.
    Validating certificate trust for Windows Mobile devices.
    The certificate is trusted and all certificates are present in the chain.
    Test Steps
    ExRCA is attempting to build certificate chains for certificate CN=mail.goodnewsjail.org, OU=Domain Control Validated.
    One or more certificate chains were constructed successfully.
    Additional Details
    A total of 1 chains were built. The highest quality chain ends in root certificate OU=Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority, O="The Go Daddy Group, Inc.", C=US.
    Analyzing the certificate chains for compatibility problems with Windows Phone devices.
    Potential compatibility problems were identified with some versions of Windows Phone.
    <label for="testSelectWizard_ctl12_ctl06_ctl02_ctl02_ctl01_tmmArrow">Tell
    me more about this issue and how to resolve it</label>
    Additional Details
    The certificate is only trusted on Windows Mobile 6.0 and later versions. Devices running Windows Mobile 5.0 and 5.0 with the Messaging and Security Feature Pack won't be able to sync. Root = OU=Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority, O="The Go Daddy
    Group, Inc.", C=US.
    ExRCA is analyzing intermediate certificates sent by the remote server.
    All intermediate certificates are present and valid.
    Additional Details
    All intermediate certificates were present and valid.
    Testing the certificate date to confirm the certificate is valid.
    Date validation passed. The certificate hasn't expired.
    Additional Details
    The certificate is valid. NotBefore = 2/19/2013 3:16:45 PM, NotAfter = 4/13/2016 1:07:13 AM
    Checking the IIS configuration for client certificate authentication.
    Client certificate authentication wasn't detected.
    Additional Details
    Accept/Require Client Certificates isn't configured.
    Testing HTTP Authentication Methods for URL https://mail.goodnewsjail.org/Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/.
    The HTTP authentication methods are correct.
    Additional Details
    ExRCA found all expected authentication methods and no disallowed methods. Methods found: Basic
    An ActiveSync session is being attempted with the server.
    Errors were encountered while testing the Exchange ActiveSync session.
    Test Steps
    Doug Pruiett Good News Jail & Prison Ministry Richmond, Virginia www.goodnewsjail.org

  • How do I get macmail to work with exchange server 2010?

    my company upgraded to exchange server 2010 and since then, I can't access ical shared calendars. I've been forced to switch to Outlook for my email client at work. Now I can't receive email at home using macmail. Is there a way for macmail to work with exchange server 2010?
    Intel tower running snow leopard 10.6.8 with the latest version of macmail.
    Any insight into this problem is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks very much.

    Hi,
    Please refer to the following link http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-3581
    For changing the HTTP, you need to do it outside the muse after exporting the site or after uploading it to godaddy.
    Regards,
    Aish

  • Exchange server 2010

    Hello everybody,
    I created a domain named apex.local, afterwards i installed exchange server 2010 and i created users' mailboxes. Each user has its mail address made up of his name & apex.local (example:
    [email protected]). But there is an issue i want to fix, i want to make a change so that
    "[email protected]" becomes "[email protected]" without reinstalling exchange server 2010. How can i proceed to solve this problem??

    Hi,
    To change the primary address, we need to add it in the accepted domain and an email address policy.
    For more information, you can refer to the following article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124423(v=exchg.141).aspx
    And I’d like to add that we need to add the host name autodiscover.apex.org in the certificate.
    If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange Server 2010 Room Mailboxes Double Booking

    We are have several room mailboxes setup on Exchange Server 2010 and are having an issue with rooms being double booked.
    I have "Allow Conflicting Meeting Requests" unchecked on the Resource Policy Tab but if a user try's to book a room that is already reserved it gets accepted and put on the calendar.
    How do I stop this from happening?
    Here are the settings for the room:
    AutomateProcessing                  : AutoAccept
    AllowConflicts                      : False
    BookingWindowInDays                 : 365
    MaximumDurationInMinutes            : 1440
    AllowRecurringMeetings              : True
    EnforceSchedulingHorizon            : True
    ScheduleOnlyDuringWorkHours         : False
    ConflictPercentageAllowed           : 0
    MaximumConflictInstances            : 0
    ForwardRequestsToDelegates          : True
    DeleteAttachments                   : True
    DeleteComments                      : False
    RemovePrivateProperty               : True
    DeleteSubject                       : False
    AddOrganizerToSubject               : True
    DeleteNonCalendarItems              : True
    TentativePendingApproval            : True
    EnableResponseDetails               : True
    OrganizerInfo                       : True
    ResourceDelegates                   : {}
    RequestOutOfPolicy                  : {}
    AllRequestOutOfPolicy               : False
    BookInPolicy                        : {}
    AllBookInPolicy                     : True
    RequestInPolicy                     : {}
    AllRequestInPolicy                  : False
    AddAdditionalResponse               : False
    AdditionalResponse                  :
    RemoveOldMeetingMessages            : True
    AddNewRequestsTentatively           : True
    ProcessExternalMeetingMessages      : False
    RemoveForwardedMeetingNotifications : False
    MailboxOwnerId                      : gsc.local/Users/Board Room
    Identity                            : gsc.local/Users/Board Room
    IsValid                             : True

    The most common cause of this issue is that you have both Outlook Direct Booking and AutoAccept enabled. To fix this logon to the Mailbox using Outlook and disable direct booking see (or use a script) http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/07/15/a-significant-update-to-remove-directbooking-script-is-now-available.aspx
    and   http://blogs.technet.com/b/mohammad_qassim/archive/2011/05/22/meeting-rooms-double-booking-in-exchange-2007.aspx
    Cheers
    Glen

  • Free Busy takes over 30 seconds to retrieve on Outlook 2010 using Exchange Server 2010

    We have a small 100 user domain running Exchange server 2010 and outlook 2010 clients.  The issue is that Retrieving Free/Busy takes over 30 seconds.  
    So someone is trying to schedule a meeting has to wait Minutes see the Free/busy time for many users..  I have checked and all the users in question have published at least one month free busy time.
    It seems it would be much faster.  Anyone have this same experience and know of a way to speed it up?
    thanks in Advance
    David 

    Hi David,
    Does the issue happen in OWA? In Exchange 2010, the free/busy information is retreved by using Availability service (EWS url). Generally, if a user wants to view free/busy information when create a meeting, the http Availability service request
    would send to CAS server.
    Please check whether the usage in Exchange server is high when the slow free/busy information occurs. This reflect time would also be related to the network in your environment.
    Regards,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Documentation for getting Webcenter PS4 to work with Exchange Server 2010.

    I have a customer who has Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 and wants to have their e-mail in WebCenter Spaces app we have built, using 11.1.1.4 or 11.1.1.5. Do either of these support Xchange Server 2010? Probably not, right? Well has anybody done it and been able to get it to work? Is there any documentation out there that tells how to do it?
    Thanks,

    This documentation is great. Thanks,
    Is there any documentation on this for 11.1.1.6? (PS5)? The documentation you gave me is 11.1.1.5 and it shows Exchange Server 2007. My customer has Exchange Server 2010. Do you know if 11.1.1.5 and/or 11.1.1.6 supports Exchange Server 2010?
    Again, thanks for your help.

  • Exchange Server 2010 - Authentication fails with DC

    I have implemented Windows Server 2008 R2 Active Directory on Server: DC1
    I have Implemented Exchange Server 2010 SP2 on Server: EMLSERVER
    Previously MDeamon 5.5 was using for Messaging Services.
    Manager told me he want only email server to be available after office hours.
    For Exchange Server 2010 we have to power on two servers AD and EXCH.
    For This reason i install AD on Exchange Server 2010 and Transfer all Roles from DC1 to EMLSERVER.
    Now EMLSERVER is our AD and EXCH, and DC1 is our ADC.
    To check this configuration i power off current ADC old DC (DC1).
    when i try to test OWA, it was not working, and i get HTTP 500 Error, i try to troubleshoot it and finally after enabling Form Based Authentication Service HTTP 500 error has been resolved and i get OWA Page there when i try to Authenticate with Username
    and Password i have got  HTTP 400 error and i am sucked now.
    Can anyone suggest what should i do now.

    The Requirement is that I have to provide a solution that is equivalent to MDeamon 5.5, where Company have just one DC which is use for authentication and group policy on Windows and another server which is MDeamon email server.
    After office hours they power off DC and just email server is power on.
    Therefore new solution must fulfill the same requirement, and in this scenario I have to put DC and Email together so that there is no power overhead.
    1- Yes new DC which is together with Exchange is Global Catalog.
    2- All Microsoft Exchange services are running.
    3- There is no smart card authentication, there is just User/Pass require to authenticate.
    4- Old DC/ Current ADC has been powered off after verifying transfer of all AD roles.
    5- Previously I have installed DC on DC1 server and Exchange 2010 on EMLSERVER and it was working fine.

  • Exchange Server 2010 Backup and Restore

    Hai,
    I have Exchange server 2010 stand alone server combined with mailbox, hub and cas role. i dont have backup application program. I want to take my exchange database backup to my SAN storage automatically everyday...
    Using windows server backup i can take full backup only and i can schedule it to happen daily.. Is it possible can i take incremental backup??????????for exchange 2010 database.
    Thanks Chandru CT. MCITP

    You have two basic options to backup Exchange 2010, VSS snapshots and "native backup" (meaning a Lag copy).  As far as VSS backups go, there are three components; the VSS Writer, the VSS Provider, and the VSS Requestor.  The Writer is built into
    Exchange.  In fact in Exchange 2010 there are two - the Exchange VSS Writer and the Exchange VSS Replica Writer.  The provider can be a software VSS provider such as the Microsoft Shadow Copy provider or a hardware provider (usually supplied by your
    SAN vendor.  The requestor is what you would tend to think of as the backup application; it coordinates activities between the Writer and the Provider.
    As far as the Exchange 2010 plugin for Windows backup goes, it a very minimal requestor.  It only supports the Exchange 2010 VSS Writer, not the Replica Writer.  This means you can only take backups of the Active copy of a database.  The requirement
    to backup the entire "volume" in the windows sense, or partition to the rest of us is a function of the way VSS works and is no real surprise.  In fact, another limitation of VSS is that the logs and database need to be on seperate volumes: see
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832794.aspx. 
    That it only takes full backups makes sense as well.  Shadow copies, like many software providers and many hardware providers out there are copy on write.  Initially, after the first one that is, they take up minimal space for some metadata. 
    As data is writen to the volume while the the snapshot is in place, the original blocks are evacuated to a "difference area" and the write is then written to the newly evacul\ated spot.  You can generally put the difference area on the same volume or
    somewhere else.  The downside is to write a block while a copy on write snapshot is in place means a read and two writes for every write.  This gets ugly on RAID 5 which already has a write penalty of 4; that turns into 9 IOs for every write while
    the copy on write snapshot is in place.  Since you can't do the snapshots on the replica because the replica writer isn't supported, that IO hit is on the active copy.  When using copy on write snapshots, you generally want as few around as possible
    for as short a time as possible; usually just long enough to export or copy the snapshot to another set of spindles.  I really wouldn't want to use WSB plugin for Exchange 2010 in anything but the smallest deployments.
    What about native backup?  Well then you take a 100% space hit for every lag copy.  In addition, restoring a LAG is a one shot deal.  As you strive with the LAG to match what you could achieve with even daily or weekly copy on write snapshots,
    the number of database copies, and Exchange mailbox servers,  poliferates.  You may want to consider a "Happy medium" that combines a LAG for fault tolerance/protection against logical corruption with copy on write snapshots (replicated or copied
    to seperate storage) for HA.  Perhaps DPM would be worth a look in your situation.
    You did mention that you have a SAN.  Most SAN vendors offer hardware VSS Providers.  Many are copy on write, and you shift that set of problems to the, albeit likey a bit more performant SAN, Some vendors use other stratagies.  The vendor
    I work for uses allocate on write, so it avoids the 3 IOs per write copy on write penalty while a snapshot is in place.  This means you can snapshot frequently and keep many of them around without penalty shortening your RPO and RTO.  They optionally
    archive truncated logs allowing for "up to the minute" restore of older snapshots, not just the last one.  They also provide a proprietery version of RAID 6, called RAID DP that outperforms RAID 1.  Combine that with all the storage efficiency features
    like dedupe of primary storage, thin provisioning, compression, etc., that can all be combined and it starts to get compelling as the size of your deployment increases.  Although I might be a bit biased when it comes to SAN vendors, if your SAN is someone
    other than NetApp I still encourage you to talk with your SAN vendor and see what features/functionality they offer that can help you address your backup needs for Exchange 2010.  I think you'll find much to like; it really comes down to scale and a cost/benefit
    analysis.
    If you decide that hardware VSS providers are not you thing and want to stay with a software vss provider, I encorage you to talk to the usual backup software vendors as well.  Many can integrate with DAS and/or SAN, and have their own software
    VSS providers often including support for the Exchange 2010 replica writer.  This at a minimum allows you to snapshot passive copies.  Features like replication (to get the changed blocks to other storage or off site), tape support (to roll backups
    off to tape potentially to store off site) and catalogs come to mind as very useful things to have.
    I'd take a look around at what's available and see if any of the things offered meet your business needs at a price you can afford to pay.  The WSB Plug-in is a bare bones sort of thing, and it only gets better from there.
    J

  • CUCM 7.1.2 and Exchange Server 2010

    Hi,
    I have a cucm 7.1.2 installed and configured and an exchange server 2010 box as mail server on another system.
    If I want to send voice mail from Cisco IP phone through the cucm to the exchange server, do I need an external voice mail like Cisco Unity, or the cucm should have everything I need.
    Thank you!

    Hi -
    If you want to use Exchange 2010 as your voicemail system, you need an Exchange server hosting the Unified Messaging server role.  Microsoft has specific requirements for using Exchange unified messaging as well as licensing for your voicemail subscribers.  Here is a good review - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125141.aspx.  Plus there should be an integration document for voicemail functionality, I found the CUCM version 7 integration doc here - http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=d5db0297-7850-4f52-b965-b8006b4c05f5&displaylang=en
    Regards, Ginger

  • Coldfusion 10 and Exchange Server 2010

    I am using Coldfusion 10 and I have been trying to connect to Exchange server 2010.
    I keep getting this error message: Unable to connect to the Exchange server using HTTP/HTTPS protocol. HTTP response code : 302
    I have asked the Coldfusion hosting service to check the cacert for the required certificates and they said that all of the certificates for the hosted exchange server were installed.
    If I use the serverVersion="2010" tag I get this error:
    Could not connect to the exchange server with the credentials.
    Exchange Server doesn't support the requested version.
    The company that is hosting my exchange server account just recently upgraded their servers to Exchange Server 2010. When they were running Exchange Server 2007 and i was using Coldfusion 8 my script worked fine.
    Any ideas why I am unable to connect to the exchange server  now.
    Below is the script that I am running.
    <!DOCTYPE HTML>
    <html>
    <head>
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <cfoutput>
      <cfset count = 0>
      <cfset serverName="ex2010.gothamemail.com">
      <cfset username="[email protected]">
      <cfset password="xxxxxxxxxxx">
      <cfexchangeconnection 
              action="open"
              Protocol="https"
              connection="myExchangeConnection"
              username="#username#"
              password="#password#"
              server="#serverName#">
         <cfexchangecontact
              action = "get"
              name = "current_contacts"
              connection = "myExchangeConnection">
       <cfexchangefilter name="MaxRows" value="2781">
      </cfexchangecontact>  
      <cfexchangeconnection action="close" connection="myExchangeConnection" />
      </cfoutput>
    <table width="100%" border="1">
       <tr><th>No.</th><th>UID</th><th>Firstname</th><th>Lastname</th><th>Email</th></tr>
       <cfoutput query="current_contacts">
            <cfset count = #count# + 1>
           <tr><th>#count#</th><th>#UID#</th><th>#Firstname#</th><th>#Lastname#</th><th>#Email1#</th ></tr>
       </cfoutput>
    </table>
      <cfexchangeconnection
         action="close"
         connection="myExchangeConnection">
    </body>
    </html>

    You might try adding the formBasedAuth option in your cfexchangeconnection.   I has similar trouble and my solution was to add the application file with "exchangeServerVersion=2010" and to track down the location of owa on my Exchange servers.
    <cfexchangeconnection
    action = "open"
    connection = "CurrentRandSet"
    server = "webmail.***********"
    username = "*******"
    password = "***********"
    protocol = "https"
    formBasedAuthentication = "true"
    formBasedAuthenticationURL = "https:/**************/owa/auth/owaauth.dll"
    >

  • Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard "Certificate Authority Service" / Exchange Server 2010 EMC not starting and no AD connectivity for authentication.

    Hello,
    I am a new IT Manager at this company and need assistance big time. Their environment looks as follows:
    Server 1. Domain Controller Server (Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard) running active directory.
    Server 2. Email Server (Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard) running Exchange Server 2010 .
    * Note. No back ups to work with aside from whats mentioned below.
    DC had a virus infection causing a lot of issues on the shared network drives 2 days ago locking up all the files with a crypto ransom virus. Running Avast suppressed the infection. Had to recover the file shares which luckily had a back up. 
    The issue is that the Exchange Server 2 post this lost connectivity with the AD Server 1. Exchange Server 2 when launching EMC could not launch the console stating the following:
    "No Exchange servers are available in any Active Directory sites. You can’t connect to remote
    Powershell on a computer that only has the Management Tools role installed."
    Shortly after I found that it is possible the EMC launcher was corrupt and needed to be reinstalled following another blog post. I deleted the exchange management console.msc  per instructions only to discover I couldnt relaunch it because there was
    no way how. So I copied another msc file that happened to be on the DC Server 1  back to Exchange Server 2 and got it to launch again. 
    Another post said that it might be an issue with the Domain Account for the Computer, so to delete it in the AD Server 1 only to find that rejoining it from Exchange Server 2 using Computer>Properties> Chage Settings > Change is greyed out because
    it is using the Certificate Authority Service.
    I tried manually re-adding the computer in AD and modeling permissions after another server in group settings but no go. After this I was unable to login to the Exchange Server 2 with domain accounts but only local admin, receiving the following Alert:
    "The Trust Relationship between this workstation and primary domain failed."
    I tried running the Power Shell tools on Exchange Server 2 to rejoing and to reset passwords for domain accounts as noted in some other blogs but no luck as the Server 2 could not make the connection with Server1 or other errors it kept spitting out.
    I also during the investigation found the DNS settings were all altered on both the Server 1 and Server 2 which I luckily was able to change back to original because of inventorying it in the beginning when I started. 
    I need help figuring out if I need to rejoin the Exchange Server 2 manually by disabling the Certificate Authority Service (or removing the CA as listed here:
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/fb23deab-0a12-410d-946c-517d5aea7fae/windows-server-2008-r2-with-certificate-authority-service-to-rejoin-domain?forum=winserversecurity
    and getting exchange server to launch again. (Mind you I am relatively fresh to server managing) Please help E-Mail has been down for a whole day now!
    Marty

    I recommend that you open a ticket with Microsoft Support before you break things more.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Send As, Send on Behalf and Full Access for Exchange server 2010/2013

    [This FAQ contains 2 parts]
    Testing and watching the behavior of Send As, Send On Behalf and Full Access permission.
    Common issue and Troubleshooting on the three permission.
    [Testing and Watching]
    Based on following blog, I decide to test on my lab:
    Full Mailbox Access Rights + Send On Behalf = Send As ?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/ehlro/archive/2012/04/06/full-mailbox-access-rights-send-on-behalf-send-as.aspx
    Description on my lab and test:
    Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010
    Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
    Senders: A01, A02, … , A07, A08
    Recipient: A09
    A01 grand permission to other senders.
    Two methods:
    a. Use A0x’s credential configure A01’s profile, then send From both A01 and A0x via Outlook. Watching result in A09’s Inbox and Sent Items which has message copy left.
    b. Use A0x’s credential configure A0x’s profile, then send From both A01 and A0x via Outlook. Watching result in A09’s Inbox and Sent Items which has message copy left.
    Result as following forms:
    1. Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010 / Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
    Using A0x’s credential configure A01’s mailbox, then send From both A01 and A0x
    To A09.
    2. Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010 / Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013
    Using A0x’s credential configure A0x’s mailbox, then send From both A01 and A0x
    To A09.
    [Common Issue]
    1. [Issue]
    Exchange 2010 + Outlook 2010. A01 grand A03 Send As permission. However A03 can’t send as A01 to A09 and get NDR:
    You can’t send a message on behalf of this user unless you have permission to do so. Please make sure you’re sending on behalf of the correct sender, or request the necessary permission. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Details as following pic:
    [Troubleshooting]
    1) Based on the NDR, it seems a permission issue. Check Send As permission, however the Send As permission configured correctly. Pic as below:
    2) ince the Send As permission configured correctly, it seems the permission hasn’t been replicated. Try to restart Microsoft Exchange Information Store service. It works.
    Note: The Send As permission isn’t granted until after replication has occurred. Replication times depend on your Exchange and network configuration. To grant the permission immediately, stop and then restart the Microsoft Exchange Information
    Store service.
    2. [Issue]
    Exchange 2013 + Outlook 2013. A01 grand A03 Send As permission. However A03 can’t send as A01 to A09 and get NDR:
    Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
    Subject: xxx
    Sent: xx/xx/2014 8:20 AM
    The following recipient(s) cannot be reached: A09
    This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Error is [0x80070005-00000000-00000000].
    Details as below:
    [Troubleshooting]
    1) Also check the Send As permission configuration first.
    2) Then try to use A03 send as A01 to A09 via OWA. If OWA works well, it seems and issue on the Outlook client side.
    3) This behavior may occur if the OAB in Outlook isn’t updated. Try to download OAB manually.
    4) If doesn’t work, please close Outlook and try to delete all the OAB folder on your computer. The path of OAB folder in Win7, Win8 as below:
    \Users\<UserName>\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook\Offline Address Books
    5) Restart Outlook.
    Note: Be aware that you cannot send e-mail messages on behalf of a mailbox if the mailbox is hidden from address list. When sending a message, Exchange requires that e-mail address is resolved in the
    From field.
    3. [Issue]
    Exchange 2010. A01 grant A0x “Send As” or “Send on Behalf” permission. A0x send as/ send on behalf of A01. The message is only copied to the Sent Items folder in A0x’s mailbox (same as the result of my test). Also cannot configure Exchange 2010 so that the
    message is copied to the Sent Items folder of both A01 and A0x.
    [Troubleshooting]
    This issue occurs because Exchange server 2010 was designed to copy message to the Sent Items folder of the sender only. This issue can be solved by installing Exchange 2010 SP2 UR4. More details in the following KB:
    Messages that are sent by using the "Send As" and "Send on behalf" permissions are copied only to the Sent Items folder of the sender in an Exchange Server 2010 environment
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2632409/en-us
    Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

    Nice guide Mavis, I recently explored the same topic. Few things you might want to add is the type of connectivity (Cached vs Online will produce different results) and to expand further on the methods of adding the other mailbox in Outlook (additional mailbox
    vs additional account defaults to different methods). Check the screenshot:
    And please post this somewhere more visible, like blog/wiki page.

  • MS Exchange server 2010 messages will be placed in the poison queue and the transport service will crash

    Can any1 please help.
    We have Exchange server 2010, we just upgraded it with SP3 and then the issue occers that we were unable to send n receive mail outside of our LAN...i mean from gmail or hotmail..
    we have then updated with CU4 which is the latest but still messages will be placed in the poison queue and the transport service will crash.
    We have disabled the antivirus also but issue remains same.
    We have CAS 1 n 2 as of Clustering environment and we upgraded sp3 for both. but we did CU4 on CAS1 to see the results to resovle this issue but no luck

    Hi,
    Did you get any NDR message now when you send a email to outside? And vice versa.
    In addtion,I recommend you telnet to port 25 to test SMTP communication.
    If any question,please feel free to post here.
    Thanks.
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue with ALSA softvol and reloading sound card module

    I'm using a Chaintech AV710 card with the snd_ice1724 module as a driver. The core issue is that sometimes when this module is loaded during startup (or every time after a suspend), it will play nothing but very loud static. To fix this, I simply rel

  • Free.Of Charge Sub.Delivery.

    Hi Gurus, Here Iam doing Free of Charge Subsequent delivery( Doc Type SD) With reference to the Returns Order. While Iam doing this Free.Of Charge Sub.Delivery, The system is showing an error"The system has Collected messages (see log)". Gurus Please

  • What are the main steps to be taken care while doing recording for LSMW

    Hi, I am facing problem in LSMW. Can anybody suggest me that What are the main steps to be taken care while doing recording for LSMW for recording mm01 ? thanks' naresh

  • Photoshop Elements & Premiere Elements Mac - PC

    Hallo liebe Community! Ich finde leider keine Antwort auf meine Frage: Wenn ich Adobe Photoshop Elements & Premiere Elements 12 [Mac & PC], wie es im Paket bei  Amazon angeboten wird auf meinem Mac installiere und eines Tages auf einen PC umsteigen m

  • Remote desktop client and colour management

    After googling I found nothing relevant. Anybody has any information about using ps cs5 in win7 using ms rdp client for mac? What about monitor profiles on both ends to get colours right? Having linux, win7 and mac computers, but because space on my