Exchange Server 2010 mailflow reporting using SCOM 2007

Hi,
We are using SCOM 2007R2 in our Organization and we are Monitoring Exchange server 2010.
We are in need of reports for Mailflow statistics (send and receive)from Exchange server 2010 using SCOM 2007R2.
Eg: Microsoft Exchange 2010 Server Reports Transport Platform Hourly server Statistics.
By default reports available in SCOM for Exchange server will not fulfill our requirement.
Earlier for Exchange server 2007 we are able to fetch the desired reports which is available by default.
Eg: Exchange 2007 SMTP Message Received
Exchange 2007 SMTP Message Sent
Is there any way to fetch the reports for Exchange server 2010 same as Exchange 2007 reports.
Thanks

Hi SonarPal,
Please look at this post, hope it helps:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ffdb8883-226f-410f-abde-bd75c4c88c4a/exchange-transport-reports-no-data?forum=operationsmanagerreporting
Natalya
### If my post helped you, please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and\or Mark as an Answer

Similar Messages

Save Attachment from exchange server 2010 from oracle using java mail API

Hello,
I want to read email from microsoft exchangeserver 2010 and save attachement into a folder.I created an Java program to import attachments from a exchange server mailbox using "POP3S".It works fine when run as a java application.But when i put this inside Oracle11g R2 using load java and while executing from a procedure it gives an error at parsing message into Multipart
Error at line : Multipart mp = (Multipart)m.getContent();
Error:
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_002_A0C2E09A..................................."
java.lang.ClassCastException
at mailPop3.checkmail(mailPop3:71)
My Java Class is as follows,
import java.io.*;
import java.util.Properties;
import javax.mail.*;
import javax.mail.internet.*;
import java.util.Date;
The function i used to check for attachments is given below.
public static boolean hasAttachments(Message m) throws java.io.IOException, MessagingException
Boolean hasAttachments = false;
try
// if it is a plain/html text - no attachements
if (m.isMimeType("text/*"))
return hasAttachments;
else if (m.isMimeType("multipart/alternative"))
return hasAttachments;
else if (m.isMimeType("multipart/*"))
Multipart mp = (Multipart)m.getContent();
if (mp.getCount() > 1)
hasAttachments = true;
return hasAttachments;
catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
} finally {
return hasAttachments;
My Java Details as follows
java Version :1.5.0_10
java.vm.specification.version:1.0
java.vm.version :1.5.0_01
java.specification.version:1.5
java.class.version:48.0
Java mail API:javamail-1.4.4
Used Jars:mail.jar
Could someone explain why I am getting this error? What can I do to resolve this error?
Is any other Jar need other than mail.jar?
Any help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Nisanth

Hai EJP,
Thanks for your reply,
My full java class as follows,
import java.util.Properties;
import javax.mail.Authenticator;
import javax.mail.Folder;
import javax.mail.Message;
import javax.mail.PasswordAuthentication;
import javax.mail.Session;
import javax.mail.Store;
import javax.mail.Part;
import javax.mail.Multipart;
import javax.mail.internet.MimeMultipart;
import javax.mail.internet.MimeMessage;
public class Newmail
public Newmail()
super();
public static int mailPOP3(String phost,
String pusername,
String ppassword)
Folder inbox =null;
Store store =null;
int result = 1;
try
String host=phost;
final String username=pusername;
final String password=ppassword;
System.out.println("Authenticator");
Authenticator auth=new Authenticator()
protected PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication()
return new PasswordAuthentication(username, password);
System.out.println("Certificate");
String filename="D:\\Certi\\jssecacerts";
String password2 = "changeit";
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStore",filename);
System.setProperty("javax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword",password2);
Properties props = System.getProperties();
System.out.println("host-----"+props);
props.setProperty("mail.pop3s.port", "993");
props.setProperty("mail.pop3s.starttls.enable","true");
props.setProperty("mail.pop3s.ssl.trust", "*");
Session session = Session.getInstance(props,auth);
session.setDebug(true);
store = session.getStore("pop3s");
System.out.println("store------"+store);
store.connect(host,username,password);
System.out.println("Connected...");
inbox = store.getDefaultFolder().getFolder("INBOX");
inbox.open(Folder.READ_ONLY);
Message[] msgs = inbox.getMessages();
System.out.println("msgs.length-----"+msgs.length);
result = 0;
int no_of_messages = msgs.length;
for ( int i=0; i < no_of_messages; i++)
System.out.println("msgs.count-----"+i);
System.out.println("Attachment....>"+msgs.getContentType());
Multipart mp = (Multipart)msgs[i].getContent();
System.out.println("Casting Success" + mp.getContentType());
catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
finally
try
if(inbox!=null)
inbox.close(false);
if(store!=null)
store.close();
return result;
catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
return result;
Please check it
Regards,
Nisanth

Exchange Server 2010 Mailflow between Internet Facing-Site and No Internet Facing-Site

Hi all,
My environment there are two sites, Internet Facing-Site and No Internet Facing-Site.
The mail flow between them, it isn't working. The messages stuck in the queue.
Default Receive Connector No internet facing-site is configured, bellow:
Defaul....
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Exchange Server Authentication.
- Integrated windows....
Configuration the Internet Facing-Site, bellow:
From intenet
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Integrated windows....
And i configured a new receive connector on the Internet Facing-Site, follow bellow:
Sites
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Exchange Server Authentication.
- Integrated windows....
But, the messages yet stay stuck in the queue.
Queue error:
451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with: “421 4.2.1 Unable to connect.” Attempted failover to alternate host, but that did not succeed. Either there are no alternate hosts, or delivery failed to all alternate hosts.
I'm needing help, pls.

Please check SMTP traffic filtering/scanning enabled on the router/firewall. You can telnet even if the SMTP
traffic filtering/scanning enabled on the router/firewall. But emails will not pass through if the configuration is incorrect.
May be speed between sites causing this issue (not sure). Anyway please try changing the Tarpitinterval as a test.
To see the current setting "Get-ReceiveConnector | Select name,tarpitinterval "To set new value "Set-ReceiveConnector “<Connector-Name>”
–TarPitInterval:00:00:010"
Try restarting "MSexchange-Transport-sevice" on both servers as well
Can you send email one-way or
both ways not working?
MAS

When sending e-mail messages to a mail-enabled public folder that have been replicated from old Exchange Server 2000/2003/2007, Exchange Server 2010 environment mails are rejected with NDR.

Hi, I would like to share with you issue that I’ve solved regarding mail-enabled PF that migrated from Exchange 2000/2003/2007 to 2010, I’ve searched & contacted my MVP leader – there’s no official KB regarding this issue right
now, so I’m posting here in order to share this among others.
Note: There’s article(s) that talked about PF replication from Exch2000/2003/2007 to 2010 – this is the same issue as well.
Symptoms
E-mail messages that been sent to mail-enabled public folder in Exchange Server 2010 environment rejected with the following NDR:
“#< #5.2.0 smtp;554 5.2.0 STOREDRV.Deliver.Exception:ObjectNotFoundException; Failed to process message due to a permanent exception with message The Active Directory user wasn’t found. ObjectNotFoundException: The Active Directory
user wasn’t found.> #SMTP#”
Sometimes Exchange Server 2010 is documented as well Event ID 1020 on the Event Viewer with this information:
“Log Name: Application
Source: MSExchange Store Driver
Event ID: 1020
Level: Error
Description:
The store driver couldn’t deliver the public folder replication message "Hierarchy ([email protected])" because the following error occurred: The Active Directory user wasn't found.”
Cause
In an environment where Microsoft Exchange Server 2000 or Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 previously existed, and all those servers have been removed, there is a chance that an Administrative Group (First Administrative Group or another custom Administrative
Group) remains with a Servers container, but no servers inside it.
During replication, when the Exchange 2010 Store Driver sees the empty Servers container in Active Directory, it's expecting a System Attendant object inside the container and when it is not found the error occurs.
Resolution
To work around the issue, delete the empty Servers container. This can't be done through Exchange System Manager. Use the ADSI Edit tool to remove it using the following steps:
Warning If you use the ADSI Edit snap-in, the LDP utility, or any other LDAP version 3 client, and you incorrectly modify the attributes of Active Directory objects, you can cause serious problems. These problems may require you to reinstall Microsoft Windows
2003 Server, Microsoft Windows Server 2008, Microsoft Exchange 2010 Server or both Windows and Exchange. Microsoft cannot guarantee that problems that occur if you incorrectly modify Active Directory object attributes can be solved. Modify these attributes
at your own risk.
1.
Start the ADSI Edit MMC Snap-in. Click Start, then
Run, and type adsiedit.msc, and then click OK.
2.
Connect & Expand the Configuration Container [YourServer.DNSDomainName.com], and then expand
CN=Configuration,DC=DNSDomainName,DC=com.
3.
Expand CN=Services, and then CN=Microsoft Exchange, and then expand
CN=YourOrganizationName.
4.
You will see an empty Administrative Group. Expand the
CN=YourAdministrativeGroupName.
5.
Expand CN=Servers.
6.
Verify there are no server objects listed under the
CN=Servers container.
7.
Right click on the empty CN=Servers container and choose
Delete.
8.
Verify the modification, and try to send again the E-mail to the mail-enabled public folder.
Applies to
Exchange Server 2010, Standard Edition
Exchange Server 2010, Enterprise Edition
Netanel Ben-Shushan, MCSA/E, MCTS, MCITP, Windows Expert-IT Pro MVP. IT Consultant & Trainer | Website (Hebrew): http://www.ben-shushan.net | IT Services: http://www.ben-shushan.net/services | Weblog (Hebrew): http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/blogs/netanelb
| E-mail: [email protected]

Sounds like you are looking in the wrong Administrative Group container which is why you are seeing your Exchange 2010 servers in there.
When you install Exchange 2003 only you will see a container named by default as "CN=First Administrative Group" container. But this could be named anything if you changed the Organization Name on the installation when you installed the first
Exchange 2003 server into the domain/forest.
You will notice that when you install Exchange 2010 part of the AD setup is to create a new configuration container and is named by default "CN=First Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)".
So it sounds like you are not looking in the right location within ADSIEdit.
You may find the following article also helpful for this issue which is the same resolution:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/sbs/archive/2012/05/17/empty-cn-servers-container-causing-issues-with-public-folders-on-small-business-server-2011.aspx
I recommend though that you ensure your Exchange 2003 servers are fully uninstalled or no longer present in your environment before you go deleting the Servers container though.. The following Microsoft article will help with this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/gg576862(v=exchg.141).aspx

SCOM 2012 R2 & Exchange Server 2010 SP3 - Mailbox services not monitored

Having done everything depicted in Exchange Server 2010 MP I still have trouble with some Exchange services - they are in not monitored state (five days passed):
Mailbox All Database Services - Default-First-Site-Name
Mailbox Database Service - Management - test.local
Mailbox Database Service - PublicFolders - test.local
Mailbox Database Service - Users - test.local
Mailbox Many Database Service - Default-First-Site-Name
OfflineAddressBook Service - Default-First-Site-Name
Why is this happening? Since monitoring exchange mailbox databases is one of the most important tasks SCOM should be doing I assume something wrong is going on here. However there are no errors or alerts in SCOM console nor in OpsMgr
log on Exchange server itself.

Hi There,
Did you install the Microsoft Exchange monitoring correletion service while importing the Exchange 2010 management pack ?
Does your MS have RMS Emulator role ? As many alerts in the Exchange 2010 MP are targetted to Root management server class.
Also did you configure Test mailboxex and stuff post Exchange 2010 Import ?
Did you analyse the Ops manager Event logs in the MS and Agent ? Can you post the critical and Warnign events here.
Also is Agent proxy enabled ?
Also is the Action account of the Agents System or Domain account ?
Also refer: http://blogs.catapultsystems.com/jcowan/archive/2013/03/26/opsmgr-2012-and-2007-exchange-server-2010-monitoring-management-pack-how-to-perform-the-optional-configurations-for-synthetic-transactions-and-kerberos-authentication.aspx
Gautam.75801

Any known issue reported for "Rollup 8 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2"

Hello,
Currently our servers are running with "Exchange 2010 SP2 RU7", we are planning to update the Rollup version to RU8 for SP2.
Is there any knows issues reported for "Rollup 8 for Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 2" till now ? is it safe to update the RU8 ?
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=41394

(1) I had to roll it back:
The rollup released Tuesday the 9th caused random problems with systems ranging from general slow down to operation failed errors. It didn’t impact everyone at once and seemed to take 48hrs for everyone to have a problem. Rolling
back the update and rebooting the server seemed to resolve the issue.
Issues reported before the general mailflow stopping for everyone:
Nothing major … an occasional operation failed when I hit send but, it will go thru after I hit the send button a couple of times.
A MICROSOFT OUTLOOK BOX APPEARS WITH A TRIANGLE WITH A ! INSIDE IT. THE MESSAGE SAYS THE OPERATION FAILED.
(2)
ANOTHER CODE APPEARED WHEN I TRIED TO SEND THIS E-MAIL SO I CLOSED OUTLOOK AND RE-STARTED OUTLOOK. THE MESSAGE READ, CANNOT CREATE THE E-MAIL MESSAGE BECAUSE A DATA FILE TO SEND AND RECEIVE MESSAGE CANNOT BE FOUND. CHECK YOUR SETTINGS IN THIS MICROSOFT
OUTLOOK PROFILE. IN MICROSOFT WINDOWS, CLICK CONTROL PANEL.CLICK USER ACCOUNTS AND THEN CLICK MAIL. CLICK SHOW PROFILE, AND THEN CLICK PROPERTIES.
When he tries to open an e-mail, he gets an error message.
If he tries to mark an e-mail unread, he gets a different message.
Thanks Ben

Exchange server 2010 redundancy using static IPs in different sites

Dear All;
We are facing a problem in Exchange server 2010 which is that we need to provide redundancy for two different sites which contain the same exchange databases using DAG but the issue is that if the main exchange server fails, users from the internet will
not be able to access the server because the main static IP is in the main site ...
========================================
My question is how to provide redundancy using two Global IPs in two different sites, and is there any consequences of doing such a setup?
========================================

Hi,
From your description, I would like to clarify the following things:
1. It is recommended to configure the IP Configuration for both the MAPI and Replication NIC on DAG nodes.
2. A site failure is managed differently from the types of failures that can cause a server or database failover. A site failure is considered to be a disaster recovery event, recovery should be manually performed and completed for the client service to
be restored and for the outage to end.
For more information, here is an article for your reference.
Switchovers and Failovers
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298067(v=exchg.141).aspx
Besides, what do you mean by "global IPs"?
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Free Busy takes over 30 seconds to retrieve on Outlook 2010 using Exchange Server 2010

We have a small 100 user domain running Exchange server 2010 and outlook 2010 clients. The issue is that Retrieving Free/Busy takes over 30 seconds.
So someone is trying to schedule a meeting has to wait Minutes see the Free/busy time for many users.. I have checked and all the users in question have published at least one month free busy time.
It seems it would be much faster. Anyone have this same experience and know of a way to speed it up?
thanks in Advance
David

Hi David,
Does the issue happen in OWA? In Exchange 2010, the free/busy information is retreved by using Availability service (EWS url). Generally, if a user wants to view free/busy information when create a meeting, the http Availability service request
would send to CAS server.
Please check whether the usage in Exchange server is high when the slow free/busy information occurs. This reflect time would also be related to the network in your environment.
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Use Different mailbox or same mailbox if setup two accepted domains in one Exchange Server 2010

Hi,
I want to know if I setup two accepted domain in one Exchange Server 2010, will it have another mailbox or use same mailbox?

Hi,
Based on my knowledge, to add a new name in the accepted domain list is to add a SMTP address suffix for the mailboxes. Thus, it uses the same mailbox if you setup two accepted domain in one Exchange Server 2010.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Exchange Server 2010 - Problem configuring my server 2008 so my clients can use Outlook to send/receive e-mails

Hi,
I am new to the servers and domains stuff. Therefore i have setup succesfully a Server 2008 R2 server with AD, DHCP, DNS roles installed. I configured the roles as i wanted and then i installed Exchange Server 2010 so the clients can use Outlook to send
receive mails in and out of the domain.
I can send/receive mails inside the domain (disalfa.com) but i cannot send/receive mails outside the domain. I configured the Exchange properly, i am sure of that. I am 99,9% i did something wrong with the DNS (A records, MX records, etc.).
Also is there something i must do from the control panel of the site i purchased the domain name and the mails?
Can someone guide me so i can manage to work this out?
Server 2008 - 192.168.1.250
Registered Domain - disalfa.com
Thank you in advance

Hi ,
I recommend you refer to the following article to configure your external mail flow:
Configure Internet Mail Flow Directly Through a Hub Transport Server
Prerequisites
Register MX resource records for all accepted domains in a public domain name system (DNS) server. Consult the documentation of your DNS provider for information about how to register MX records for your domain. Detailed procedures about how to complete
this step are outside the scope of this topic.
Configure network gateways to allow SMTP traffic to and from the Hub Transport server. Consult the documentation for your network routers and firewalls for information about how to route SMTP traffic to and from the Hub Transport server. Detailed procedures
about how to complete this step are outside the scope of this topic.
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange Server 2010 Exams 70-662 & 70-663 - What Service Pack do these exams use??

Hi there.
I'm planning on sitting 70-662 and 70-663 before they are retired on July 31st.
I cannot, for the life of me find out what Service Pack the exams are currently based on.
The website doesn't tell me - http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en-us/exam-70-662.aspx
I've emailed my local testing center where I sit my exams don't know either.
Can anyone provide any validated information (please post links and dates) on what these 2 exams are currently based on?
MCSA Server 2008 MCITP Server 2008 Administrator MCITP Enterprise Desktop Support on Windows Vista CompTIA A+

The Service Pack version is important because of things such as depreciated commandlets.
As an example:
Exchange Service Pack 1 has depreciated the commands
Export-Mailbox
and
Import-Mailbox,
These command have been replaced with New-MailboxExportRequest
and
New-MailboxImoprtRequest
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607299(v=exchg.141).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607368(v=exchg.141).aspx
No User has permissions to export or import, these must be granted:
New-ManagementRoleAssignment
–Role
“Mailbox Import Export”
–User
domain\username
restart the EMS to gain access to the new cmdlets
Things like this can mean the difference between a pass and a fail.
I got a reply from an email to the Certification guidance team which answered my question:
Thank you for contacting the Microsoft Certification Guidance Team.
It’s great to hear you are interested in attaining a professional Microsoft certification for Exchange Server 2010! The exams in this path will be using Service Pack 2.
So I now to install SP2 on my test environment and see what changes were made for SP2 to ensure my study notes are up to date.
MCSA Server 2008 MCITP Server 2008 Administrator MCITP Enterprise Desktop Support on Windows Vista CompTIA A+

Receive email delay one hour using Mac Mail client (Mountain Lion) connect Exchange Server 2010

Hi all,
My boss use iPhone, iPad, MacBook Air (Mac Mail client), MacPro (Mac Mail client) connect Exchange Serve 2010 to receive emails. All clients are okay except MacBook Air, the Mac Mail client cannot receive the latest emails from Exchange Server, but it can receive (sync) the emails after one hour. The other clients can receive the latest email after Exchange Server receive new emails immediately.
In this period, the MacBook Air can receive the other IMAP, POP3 and webmail from ISP normally. I tried to set 5 mins to check emails or manual check email from Exchange Server. However, the latest email still delay one hour.......... .
I dumped a screenshot for Mac Mail setting for Exchange Server and a Log file.
could anyone help me to solve this issue?
Thanks

I am not sure what the user has the check for new messages set for but mail does arrive as short as 2 minutes. It does however arrive on his iphone immediately first.

"Message Queued for submission" performance counter high for Exchange Server 2010 Database

Hi,
We are receiving SCOM Alert as "Mail Submission service is experiencing issue: Messages Queued for Submission-sustained for 15 mins-RED (>25)".
After checking the "Messages queued for Submission" counter on the repective server it was found that the value is 66 but when we check the queue viewer we dont observe any messages stuck in Submission queue.
Would like to know what aspects can be checked here, in order to troubleshoot the issue?
The counter shows 0 value in perfmon for all other mailbox databases.
Thanks & Regards.

Hi,
This is a known issue with Exchange Server 2007 and Exchange Server 2010. We do not recommend that you use this counter for health alerts.
I recommend you refer to the following article:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2921142/en-us
It is caused by the MailSubmission service submits a message for delivery multiple times, the counter is incremented two times but decremented only one time. This situation can leave the counter with a positive value even though there
is no message in the queue. When you restart the service, the counter is reset.
Here is an similar thread for your reference:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c9b485a5-ef0e-4b9a-851e-28c4a4c0606a/msexchangeis-mailbox-messages-queued-for-submission-keeps-increasing?forum=exchangesvradminlegacy
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

All sub-folders in Mac Mail cannot synchronize with Exchange Server 2010

Hi all,
All sub-folders under Inbox in Mac Mail cannot be synchronized with Exchange Server 2010. There are 2GB messages size in Inbox folder and 500MB messages size under Inbox's sub-folders. All messages can be sent out and received and it can work in Outlook 2007 and Outlook 2010 normally. However, all messages in sub-folders cannot be synchronized (empty sub-folders).
Does this problem relate to message synchronization order of Mac Mail with Exchange Server? Do all sub-folders messages be synchronized after synchronization complete of Inbox? The synchronization of sub-folders will not happen if the synchronization of Inbox does not complete, doesn't it?
All messages synchronization is over internet. Can anybody help?
Thanks a lot
DT1640759

Hi,
1.please check the mailbox send and receive quota for exchange 2013 migrated mailbox.
2.Please check the email attributes of the exchange 2013 migrated mailbox because it seems to be a problem with that particular mailbox.
3.Then do the message tracking and that would be the only way to find the where the send messages has gone.
4.Please check and confirm you have an enough space on the disk where exchange queue database is residing.
I think I need to create a receive connector in the 2013 to receive from 2010 ?
No need ,by design exchange 2013 cas server default frontend receive connector will be having an
entire ipv4 and ipv6 segment and anonymous connection is checked by default.
I think I also need to create a send and receive connector for 2013 users to each other?
No need , an intra organisation send connector and the default receive connectors in exchange will be used
for internal mail flow between the exchange 2013 users.
Please reply me if you have any queries .
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

Exchange Server 2010: Undeliverable Message

Dear All,
We are using exchange server 2010 to send a email to a client, however, we got this message back. How can i solve this problem?
Thanks for your attention and help!
次の受信者またはグループへの配信に失敗しました:
[email protected] 受信者の電子メールプロバイダーによって拒否されたため、メッセージを配信できませんでした。
メッセージは次の組織に拒否されました。BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com。
管理者向けの診断情報:
生成サーバー: xxxx.com
[email protected] BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com #<BL2FFO11FD039.mail.protection.outlook.com #5.7.0 smtp;550 5.7.0 Relay Access Denied> #SMTP#
元のメッセージヘッダー:
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.241)
by exch.xxxx.com (192.168.10.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.210.2; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:36:47 -0700
Received: from BN1AFFO11FD049.protection.gbl (10.58.52.31) by
BN1AFFO11HUB044.protection.gbl (10.58.52.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1049.20; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:44 +0000
Received: from mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph (203.167.92.249) by
BN1AFFO11FD049.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.53.64) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:43
+0000
Received: from Crystal ([203.167.92.232]) by
mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3) with ESMTP id
2014102013364607-10992 ; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:46 +0800
X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.54])
by magsaysay.com.ph ([203.167.92.232]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service
7.0; TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) id 26975997000186d5 ; Mon, 20 Oct
2014 13:40:58 +0800
Received: from BL2FFO11FD041.protection.gbl (10.173.160.33) by
BL2FFO11HUB022.protection.gbl (10.173.161.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 15.0.1049.20; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:36 +0000
Received: from mail.xxxx.com (216.81.51.170) by
BL2FFO11FD041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.137) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1039.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014
05:36:36 +0000
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (207.46.163.236)
by exch.xxxx.com (192.168.10.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.210.2; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:36:28 -0700
Received: from BY2FFO11FD056.protection.gbl (10.1.14.33) by
BY2FFO11HUB055.protection.gbl (10.1.14.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 15.0.1039.16; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:15 +0000
Received: from mailgate.zzz.com (14.16.28.51) by
BY2FFO11FD056.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.15.193) with Microsoft SMTP
Server id 15.0.1049.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:13
+0000
X-AuditID: c0a81e07-b7f5e6d000000b4e-4d-54449f4b6588
Received: from UNER2.zzz.com (unr2.zzz.com
[192.168.30.13]) by mailgate.zzz.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with
SMTP id CA.40.02894.B4F94445; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:11 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from UN2.zzz.com ([::1]) by UNR2.zzz.com
([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:36:11 +0800
From: Yukihiro <[email protected]>
To: Simonu <[email protected]>, Charles
<[email protected]>
CC: Miln <[email protected]>, FSA
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: unia s maual / MV Kett Iand
Thread-Topic: unaa sh ml / MVlettsland
Thread-Index: Ac/sEV9D2LsdkU5fRkW0Rd1v4PsvSQAFlzIA
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 05:36:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D06AC01C.21F27%[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.2.140509
x-originating-ip: [192.168.30.123]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprJIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVyYIUcr673fJcQg8bHChbzDrexW/R3vGG2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Return-Path: [email protected]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 2
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:14.1.28.51;CTRY:HK;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(428002)(189002)(66654002)(199003)(252514010)(76176999)(21056001)(71186001)(31966008)(106466001)(81156004)(77096002)(95666004)(54356999)(105586002)(4396001)(50986999)(15975445006)(86362001)(83506001)(107046002)(84326002)(19617315012)(36756003)(85852003)(53416004)(92726001)(15974865002)(19580395003)(19580405001)(44976005)(101416001)(16236675004)(92566001)(87836001)(85306004)(99396003)(2656002)(46102003)(120916001)(15202345003)(20776003)(30436002)(512874002);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB055;H:mailgate.zzzz.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:014168051.static.ctinets.com;MX:1;A:0;LANG:en;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;UriScan:;UriScan:;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: zzz.com does not designate
permitted sender hosts)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 203.167.92.249)
[email protected];
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
X-Matching-Connectors: 130582569966280204;(42405700-fa69-4020-a9c4-08d0e394d333);()
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:216.81.51.170;CTRY:CA;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(428002)(199003)(66654002)(252514010)(189002)(81156004)(106466001)(76176999)(54356999)(36756003)(77096002)(101416001)(53416004)(50986999)(105586002)(95666004)(31966008)(46102003)(20776003)(30436002)(19580395003)(4396001)(44976005)(19580405001)(16236675004)(6806004)(21056001)(71186001)(15974865002)(15202345003)(99396003)(84326002)(120916001)(15975445006)(83506001)(92726001)(92566001)(85852003)(86362001)(2656002)(87936001)(85306004)(107046002)(512874002)(19617315012);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB022;H:mail.xxx.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:216.81.51.170.epikip.net;A:0;MX:1;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB022;UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 03706074BC
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mgcserv4/mgc(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at
10/20/2014 01:36:46 PM,
Serialize by Router on mgcserv4/mgc(Release 8.5.3|September 15, 2011) at 10/20/2014
01:36:47 PM,
Serialize complete at 10/20/2014 01:36:47 PM
X-TNEFEvaluated: 1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_D06AC01C21F27hzzzcom_"
Content-Language: ja-JP
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:203.167.92.249;CTRY:PH;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(428002)(252514010)(189002)(66654002)(199003)(76176999)(54356999)(86362001)(15974865002)(50986999)(85852003)(92566001)(92726001)(19617315012)(512874002)(46102003)(85306004)(97736003)(99396003)(120916001)(33186001)(53416004)(44976005)(105586002)(19580405001)(106466001)(16236675004)(77096002)(81156004)(19580395003)(95666004)(31966008)(71186001)(107046002)(21056001)(101416001)(15202345003)(84676001)(68736004)(30436002)(87836001)(2656002)(20776003)(4396001)(6806004)(84326002)(83506001)(15975445006)(36756003)(72026002);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB044;H:mgcserv4.magsaysay.com.ph;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:ErrorRetry;MX:1;A:0;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1AFFO11HUB044;

Hi Shiloh,
According to your description, my understanding is that you send a message to external user(@xxx.com) fail.
Before going further, I'd like to ask the following question to narrow down the issue:
1. Could you send message to any other external user except xxx.com? like google.com,outlook.com.
2. Try to disable or bypass Transport Scanning in Forefront Protection 2010 and check if any helps.
You can refer to the following article to disable or bypass FPE:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/407.how-to-disable-or-bypass-transport-scanning-in-forefront-protection-2010-for-exchange-server-fpe.aspx
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange Server 2010 mailflow reporting using SCOM 2007

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for