Excise base value Posted Incorrectly

Dear Expert,
   In our Client , the user have posted the incorrect Excise Base Value for particular material .Part II has already posted. We cannot cancelled the Excise invoice as the stock is already been consumed. Please Provide the solution for it.
Regards,
Kapil.

Hi,
You need to post a excise JV ...steps are
1)go to t code J1IH
2)Go to other adjustments tab,input the material document number,year ,excise group company code and plant and post
Note that post the amount that you need to adjust.ie suppose u have posted Rs 100 during j1iex which should have been  90 ,then in j1ih post only Rs 10
Note:1) The entry which is passed in the above tcode will not be refected in cenvat register(j2i9) ,but it is captured in ER1 report (J2IER1)
2)Subtransaction type MRDY is hit during the above transaction
Regards
Sandeep

Similar Messages

  • In correct Excise Base Value in Import PO

    Dear Experts ,
    I have an query on the  Excise Base value in Import PO .
    The problem is I have made a Import Po , paid the customs duty through MIRO & now when I am doing J1IEX_C wrt to commercial  invoice  , its showing the Excise base value which is less then the value  it should be , the tax amt like Excise BED, AED, Se cess & E cess is getting calculated correctly.
    Can somebody tell me where the problem is.
    Regards,
    DGN 21
    Edited by: dgn21 on Dec 3, 2010 6:24 AM

    >
    dgn21 wrote:
    > Dear Jeyakanthan,
    >
    > As explained earlier after paying to the customs through MIRO, I am doing J1IEX_C, in this transaction, the excise duty is being calculated correctly but the Assessable shown is incorrect.
    > I have following condition in schema:
    > Gross Price (A):
    > Insurance %(B)
    > Basic Landing Charges (C):
    > Assessable value: (A)(B)(C)
    > Basic customs Duty (D)
    > CVD (E)
    > Ecess on CVD (F):
    > S E Cess on CVD (G):
    > And then other conditions
    >
    > Presently the system is calculating the Assessable value as (A) + (D) {i.e. Gross price +Basic Customs duty}, but it should be (A) + (B) +(C).
    > Kindly tell me where I need to do the changes so I can get the correct Assessable value as desired.
    >
    >
    > Thanks in advance
    Check import pricing procedure calculations in M/08 ?

  • In MIGO wrong excise base value in import po

    Hi,
    We have done import PO applied the excise tax code EI, then we try to create MIGO except miro, but in MIGO in we changed the qty for example in PO 100qty and price 100 so total amount is 10000 so we get excise base value is 1000, but now we change the qty in mIGO as 10qty we get same excise base value as 1000 its not calculted.
    please suggest me the any config
    Thanks
    Shital

    Hi,
    i have test in SAP note u suggested
    Excise base defaulted incorrectly at the time of excise invoice capture in the imports scenario with ADC (additional duty of customs) being applicable. The excise duty values are picked from the commercial invoice captured but the excise base value is being calculated incorrectly.
    but my scenario is different
    Thanks
    Shital

  • Excise Base value calculated wrongly in GR

    Dear experts,
    When preparing Bought out goods receipt in migo,excise base value is coming wrongly(not as per PO) in sometimes.
    If we come back from the screen without saving & then try again. That time the base value is calculating correctly.
    This kind of situation is arising inconsistantly. Not regularly.
    Please suggest to overcome this issue.
    Regards
    M.Sarathi

    Hi,
    When we capture excise invoice in MIGO, SAP will default the excise base value for the total PO quantity.
    For eg. if the total PO qty is 100, and if the price is 10 INR, then during MIGO, system will show 100*10 = 1000 INR.
    Even if you have posted a partial GR of say 10 nos. already, and you are now trying to post the balance 90 nos in MIGO,
    then also, system will suggest the base value as 1000 INR (instead of 900 INR). This is a bug in the excise tab.
    Only option is to overwrite the base value manually as per the GR qty.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • Schudling agreement with time dependent excise base value taking wrongly.

    Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
    I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
    I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
    01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
    01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
    I have maintained the delivery schedule on
    15/07/08 of quantity  1 nos.
    When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
    Document date I am giving  15/07/08.
    Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
    I am giving the posting date in the excise  also 15/07/08.
    After item ok.
    When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
    When I will post the document
    The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
    And excise duty is posting  for rs: 200 only
    Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
    What setting I have to do the change the excise base value  as per  the  validity date maintained in the time dependent .
    regards
    jrp

    Hi
    I was wondering in J1ID there is validity from date only no to date, Pls tell where you have maintained excise base amount based on from to period.
    In J1ID if you maintain any new accesable value for the later date it will consider that.
    Rgds
    Srini

  • Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO  while Depot

    we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
    The BED is going to Inventory.
    material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
    The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
    But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
    ECS and SEcess both are correct.
    Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
    In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly every time it is shown us different values
    We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
    After MIGO posting:
    But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
    But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
    Why the BED is double and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
    Then I go for J1IG Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank why?
    Please kindly do the needful
    Regards
    sapman man

    Please check ur setting of maintainexsice defaults.
    BED condition type should be properly maintained.
    regards,
    Sujit

  • Excise Base value and BED is wrong in MIGO and J1IG

    Hi,
    we are creating the PO for Depot, Tax code is NO ED setoff means
    The BED  is going to Inventory.
    material is FERT material and Plant is DEPOT. we are using the conditions here are PB00some Z conditions and the BED is calculted on the PB00Z conitions ,
    The BED and ECS and SEcess is shown in PO taxes tab correctly.
    But when i go for MIGO "Create RG23D entry" the System will shown me the Double the BED and excise Base value is only taking the PB00 value, it is not taking the PB00+Z conditions why?
    ECS and SEcess both are correct.
    Here in PO the BED is calculted on PB00+Zconditions*....
    In MIGO ....in Excise Item the BED % is showing me wrong values....It is not shwoing us the 14% correctly  every time it is shown us different values
    We are maintained the J1ID correctly for these........
    After MIGO posting:
    But the BED and remaing values are correctly shown in J1IDEPOTSTCOK1 tcode.
    But when i saw the J_I1ECDHDR table the BED is Double and ECS and SECess both are correct
    Why the BED is double  and Excise base value wrong in MIGO...
    Then I go for J1IG  Here system is showing me Only BED i,e also wrong and it is not shwoing me ECS and SECess blank  why?
    Please kindly do the needful
    Regards
    sapman man

    Dear,
    Use Z condition before PB00. The same should be statastical as PB00.
    Check the excise default settings as well as,
    Check the classify condition types
    regards,
    sujit

  • Excise base value is not picking for Imports

    Dear All,
         Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
              Please suggest me
    Thanks,
    Tiru

    Hi,
    In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
    JCDB     IN:Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1     IN : CVD
    JECV     IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV     IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB     IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB     IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC     Addnl Duty of Custom
    These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
    Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
    CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
    Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
    1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
    2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
    3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
    4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
    5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
    6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
    7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice

  • In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO

    Hi expert's,
    In import process,how excise base value is calculated in MIGO,with what referance values get add to base value.
    waiting for your valuable response,
    Regards
    V.raj

    hi,
    we Tried with your following reply ! but still not finding exact value in base value .
    (MATERIAL PRICE* QTY IN MIGO * EXCHANGE RATE)
    thanks & regards
    V.Raj

  • Update Excise base value in MRP based and Non-MRP based billing

    Hi Gurus,
    We need to update Excise Base Value for Statistical Condition type. How to configure the same ?
    Sl.No  Pricing Condition Type      Active   Statistical           Passed to Accounting        
    1        MRP Price (Statistical)                                                                               
    2        Abatement (Statistical)                                                                               
    3       Surcharge  (Active&Passed to Accounting)
    4      Assessabel value (Statistical)
    (No:4 This is the base for calculating Excise duties i.e Excise Base Value)
    5       List Price (Statistical)                                              
    6       Customer Discount(Statistical)                             
    7      Surcharge(Active&Passed to Accounting)                                                                 
    8      Net Price (Active&Passed to Accounting)                                                                     
    9      BED   (Active&Passed to Accounting)                                                                          
    10    ECess  (Active&Passed to Accounting)                                                                       
    11   SECess  (Active&Passed to Accounting)
    12   Total collected from Customer(Statistical)              
    Issue: When there is MRP Price higher than the List Price, then the Cutomer will be charged on the basis of Net Price only, but the duties amount to be paid to the government on MRP Price. so in this case I can not calculate Excise Duties on the Actual Net Price condition which is active and passed on to accounting. And always the Excise duties to be calculated on Assessable value(no:4). But that condition type if I make activate then it will pass to accounting and also getting added to the Net Value(KOMP-NETWR). How to come out of this situation.(as per the customer requirement both MRP based materials and non-MRP based materials are also considered in the same sale order i.e with the same pricing procedure).
    Becasue of this EXBAS is not getting updated in the J_1IEXCDTL.
    Gurus, Share your valuable experiences and suggestions.
    Thanks &Regards
    Sreekanth
    09611147585

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
    As per your suggestion, I have maintained Material Assessable Value and then also the duty values are calculating on the basis of Assessable value maintained in the Pricing Procedure. It is not taking the Material Assessable Value into consideration. And it is not getting updated the Excise Base Value.
    In which case Material Assessable value will be taken into consideration?
    How to update the Excise Base Value in J_1IEXCDTL tables?
    Thanks&Regards
    Sreekanth

  • Excise base value not updated

    Dear all,
    We have found that excise base value is not updated after creating excise invoices,later we corrected it,
    excise base value started updating in table J_1IEXCDTL,
    Intially for 2 months excise base value is not updated in table,
    Is there any problem will arise in future ?
    or
    How to solve this issue ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Awaiting valuable replies.....
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Mar 6, 2010 5:36 PM

  • Excise Base value is missing in ARE1

    Hi All,
    I am doing Export sale through u201CExports under claim of rebateu201D process, my customer currency is in USD (in CMR), and I have maintained condition record for price in USD, also I have maintained Exchange Rate in OB08.
    In ARE1 I could not found u201CExcise baseu201D value (blank), if I maintain the condition record in INR, I could found Excise base value, what could be the reason?
    Please suggest me that, how to bring the u201CExcise Baseu201D value in ARE1 if condition record for PR00 is in USD (CMR also maintained with USD)
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi,
    Thank you for ur reply,
    I have checked in Table (Excise Invoice Item) J_1IEXCDTL , I could not found "Excise Base" value (no value), but, as I have already mentioned that, if I maintain the condition record for PR00 in INR, then it's updating Excise Base. Is there any solution for this? (if condition record in USD)
    For Excise Duties we  are doing the round off, this is also affecting while converting the values with Exchange rate i.e.USD to INR. (Differance in values) how to avoide this?
    Regards,
    Ram

  • Excise Base Value wrong for import

    HI expert
    i have import po Value is 1000, and my custom duties(inventerised) is 100,2,1.
    But when i am doing capturing excise in migo , my  excise base value is coming 1100, it must come 1103.
    Kindly let me know were i m missing
    regard
    Nabil

    Hi,
    check your custom excise invoice check value properly
    check your default setting also
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Excise base value ZERO in GR for STO

    All SAP gurus,
    I have created an STO in which my receiving plant is a depot. I have made an outbound delivery, billing and excise invoice from the supplying plant. Now when I am doing the GR through MIGO and entering the Excise Invoice no. it is showing the excise base value as zero while the BED ECS and SECESS value are flowing correctly from the EI. The system gives an error that the excise base is zero.
    Can u pls suggest what can be the issue for the same.

    Dear Ashish Dhawan,
    We are facing a similar problem and would be highly grateful if you could let us know how did the value of material from STO document type UB flow to delivery type NL.
    As we are not in position to figure out where excatly the settings needs to be done to make sure the base value along with conditions of STO appears in delivery. Since the delivery value is comming zero, we are not in position to make an excise invoice for the delivery for sending plant by J1IS.
    regards,
    chetan.

  • MIGO Excise base value to be convert to display mode

    Hi Experts,
    In MIGO item detail having Excise item tab.In this Base Value is coming in Edit Mode. I want to convert to Displaymode.Can anybody please explain me how to convert Edit mode to Displaymode.Please do needful.

    Dear ,
    At the time of MIGO,  we are able to edit base amount.
    We will get same amount in J1IEX.
    If there is difference in amount excise invoice data then how will you handle it ?
    Because of this reason excise base value is in edit mode.
    Hope above will useful to you.
    GOPAN.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sap Netweaver 4.0 testdrive on linux - impossible to connect from sapgui

    Hi guys, i've just finished to install the NW40 testdrive on a linux box, based on Redhat 9.0 distro (as requested by the equirements). At the end of installation, i have two boxes One box with winxp sp1 called Darkstar with i.p. 192.168.100.1 and Su

  • Load JAR from BLOB column?

    I have a JAR file that load and works find when I use the loadjava utility, but my software is now being deployed to a server that I don't have remote access to and can't connect remotely to the Oracle database. I need to push out updated JAR files p

  • What operating system does photoshop elements 13 use?

    what operating system does photoshop elements 13 use?

  • Sync music and stream photos??

    Anyone know if it is possible to Sync itunes music and stream the photos from the same computer?? Or even better sync some pictures and then have the option to stream more pictures from that computer as needed? Thanks

  • Flickering Observed when Mouse-Down in Mac OS

    Hi There, I created two swf's, A and B. A is a blank swf, totally. B is has one button on it. Now neither of the swf's has code, animation or any action in it. I open A and B separately in two different Safari windows. When I keep the button on SWF B