Excise duty value on sales invoice not reflecting in the actual cost

Hi,
we are paying excise duty, when we are removing material from plant for the particular project. Now excise duty paid is reflecting properly in the actual cost colunn of the the report s_alr_87013558. Secondly when we are rasing commercial invoice to the customer & excise duty paid earlier is recovered from the customer, now excise duty recovered from the customer is not being reduced from the actual cost.
Cost elment for excise duty paid - 6101100, with category 1 - primary cos/ cost reducing revenue.
Cost elment for excise duty recovered - 3801090, with category 11 - Revenue.
Kindly guide how to update(reduced) excise duty revocvered in the acutal cost.
regards
Sanjay

Hi Mohan,
Please use the formatting options to format ur question...!!
Thanks,
Tatvagna.

Similar Messages

Excise Duty Value in Export Invoice - Very Urgent

Hi Gurus,
I have created a Export delivery & Billing Documents. I am trying to create Excise Invoice in which Excise Duty values are coming as "0". We are using TAXINN Procedure , ECC 6.0
Is there any specific note or any customization required for this ?
Due to this ARE1 is also giving "0" values & subsequent "0" value in Bond Register.
Can anybody help me on this ? It is very urgent.
Thanks in advance
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Could you help yaar ...if you got solution for it ..I am facing same problem..We are going live very soon,
help of ur's could help me lot ..My mail id [email protected]
Thanks in advanec in for your help.
regards,
Vijay Khochare

Sales order not reflecting in the stock reqmt list

we have a MTO scenario.after the sales order is created we are not able to see the sales order in the stock requirement list.kindly please help.

Hi
following are the reason
1) Check requirement type in sale order and strategy group in material master.
2)if reason for rejection is activated in sales order.
3) cancel the sale order
4) schedule line category should be CP in sales order
Edited by: surendra patil on Dec 29, 2008 7:30 AM
Edited by: surendra patil on Dec 29, 2008 7:33 AM

Subtotal value in sales order not coming into the net value field.

Dear Gurus,
I am entering two manual conditions in sales order and the total of the two conditions is taking into subtotal step. I want to show that subtotal value into Net Value field(i.e. avilable in the conditions tab).
I tried number of combinations.
Please help.

As taking two pricing conditions, system is deactivating one condition. That's why the net value is considering one pricing condition only.
to make both active, one pricing condition and the other condition as surcharge with positive value.

In dealer Invoice , Excise duty values not captured from MIGO

In dealer invoice , I have changed excise duty values in MIGO . This is not captured in MIRO. But the system took excise value from default values ( from FV11 condition record ) . This is happening for New plants. Old plants works good.
Regards.,
Lakshmanan.S

hi,
create a PO with zero tax code. such that base amount is equal to the inclusive of all excise duties.
IN migo select the capture and post excise option, in the excise tab, activate the mrp indicator .
change the base value in the migo and manually enter the excise duties in migo, capture it and then post
create MIRO with reference to the PO and give the taxcode as V1(ED-8%CESS-2%HECESS-1%)instead of VO(ZERO TAX CODE)
Regards,
velu

Excise duty values not flowing from PO to MIGO

All SAP Gurus,
We have created a PO and used excisable tax code in it.
Excise duties are calculated correctly in PO.
When we go for Goods receipt against the PO, excise tab appears, but there are no values in excise fields (fiels are blank).
System allows us to enter the Excise duty values manually.
Further excise entries and register updates are happening correcetly.
We do not undersatnd why the Excise duty values are not flowing automatically from PO to GR (MIGO).
Please help.
Regards,

hi
chekc following
path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
here give appripriate conditions for ur procedure as per BED cess and other
regards
kunal

Excise Duty values getting inventoriesed in MIGO but reversed in MIRO

Dear Experts,
I am using Taxinn procedure and while creating the PO the excise duty values are calculated properly but when I am posting the MIGO the stock value is posted along with the Excise duties. The excise invoice is captured & posted in MIGO itself and the values are posted correctly.
While posting the MIRO the excess amount is posted at the time of MIGO is posted back to the material. How do i fix this??
thanks in advance
Suresh

Hi Jayakantan/Ashok
thanks for the replies
I am using Taxinn procedure and the conditions are flowing from that procedure. In the purchase order i am giving the condition types only for basic price and freight.
As far as i know, the account key determines whether the condition type is cenvatable or to be inventorised. If i give the account key as NVV the values get inventorised. If i give the other account keys and assign the gl accounts to that account key that value will be posted to that gl account and not inventorised. Correct me if i am wrong or is there any other settings which will define so.
I have done the following settings as well for the condition types
spro>log gnrl>tax on goods mvmt>india>basic settings>maintain cond typs>classify cond types
and one more similar setting in the same path.
do i need to do anything further?
Suresh

Purchase order report with basic price and Excise duty values

Hi All,
Is there any standard report in SAP to get the Purchase order basic price / qty and its Excise duty values ? Since we are including Excise duties for non - codified items (w/o material master and with cost center 'K') Purchase order and the ed values are added to the cost and the requirement is to see the split up (Basic priceEdEcs+Hcs)for these Purchase orders for the vendors. If there is no std report then please let me know how to link Purchase order table with this Condition value table in query to get the desired report.
Thanks in advance
Benny

Hi,
there is no standert report to fullfill this requierment
you have to create this report with the help of abaer
for that which tax code you are using its importnat thing
for po table EKPO
1. A524 (Normal supply point / Material) it will return condition record number for condition type.
2. KONP (Conditions (Item)) .
3. J_1IMTCHID (Combination of Material Number and Chapter ID).
4. J_1IEXCTAX (Tax calc. - Excise tax rates
5 get the IR no. from RBKP and RSEG, and get the relevant FI doc no. and goto BSET table
for IR number to get from table apply logic for doc type RE ,you will get fi number nad in refernce field you will get invoice number + fiscal year
Map this by refernig on po for which grn and invoice happen
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Excise Duty, Cess and Secondary Cess not displaying in J1IIN

Dear Frnds,
I need a solution for Excise Duty, Cess and Secondary Cess not displaying in J1IIN ( WHILE EXCISE ) but in Invoice it is calculated correctly., ( ie., i need CENVAT Posted, not utilized
after excise invoice generated )
kindly suggest me...
Thanks & Regards
T.Arulvanan

HI.
Plz check the forllowing settings,
IMG - Logistic General - Tax on Goods Mvt - India - Basic Settings -
1. Maintain Excise Registrations -
Check Proper Indicator for Cess and other settings.
2. Maintain Company Code Settings
3. Maintain Plant Settings
4. Maintain Excise Groups
5. Maintain Series Groups
6. Maintain Excise Duty Indicators
-- Determination of Excise Duty
7. Select Tax Calculation Procedure
--Condition-Based Excise Determination
8. Define Tax code and assign it to company code
Properly maintiain fallowing settings and try again..
Prashant

Excise Duty Value

Hi,
Iam using TAXINN procedure. My customer wants to capture the excise value of the material while it is purchased from the First Stage dealer. While material is purchased from manufacturer we have definite exxcise duty percentage but when it is purchased from dealer he passes only the excise value for which he purchased.
Dealer purchased price
Material X = 1000
Excise duty =100
Purchased from Dealer
Material X =1200
Excise duty =100.
The excise duty is 100 because the dealer can pass only 100 for which he purchased.

Hi There,
For the First stage dealer scenario you need to create the PO with duty + net price of the material, you can put the sum of thease two factors in Net price field at Po line item detail..
Don't put any taxes on the invoice tab at item detail level of PO.
That means taxes are zero.
Now while doing the MIGO (GR) while capturing / capturing and posting the duties, at the item level for each lime item of GR enter the excise duties manually from the physical excise invoice.
At the header level in excise tab, click on the radio button just near the option of capture and post excise duty at header level.
Once in select the misclleneuos tab and click on the MRP (Maximum retail price), it will deduct the tax amount from the net price of the material.
Hope it clears your doubt.
Regards,
Sujoy

Roundong-off excise duty values

Hi all!
I need to round-off the excise duty values while passing it through J1IEX.
I did the following,
1. I have changed the rounding rule for condition types JMOP, JEC1, JSEP & JVRD as 'A' (Also i checked with 'B' ) and
2. In SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods mvt - India - Basic settings - Maintain Company code settings - Enabled rounding duty on payment for particular company code.
But still while i capture and post the excise amount in J1IEX the values are not rounded-off. Can anybody give some inputs regarding this.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Raj.

For all the Conditions Keep the Rounding Rule Blank ie : Commercial then it will Work.
> In SPRO - Logistics general - Tax on goods mvt - India - Basic settings - Maintain Company code settings - Enabled rounding duty on payment for particular company code.
This Setting is Correct.

Check Box values not reflecting in the pageflow instace variable

Hello BEA Experts,
I am binding a checkBox group to an instance variable of a Pageflow , it seems that the array inside the pageflow is null no matter what can you please let me know why.
Is it possible to bind the checkbox group tag to an array in Pageflow or is there anything wrong with the way I am using the checkbox group with in a data- repeater table.
Here are the code snippets..
JSP:
<netui-data:repeaterItem>
<tr class="tablebody">
<td>
<netui:checkBoxGroup dataSource="{pageFlow.nodeIds}">
<netui:checkBoxOption value="{container.item.nodeId}">&nbsp
</netui:checkBoxOption>
</netui:checkBoxGroup>
Contoller:
Has a private instance varible named nodeIds with getter and setter methods..
Please let me know why the checked values are not reflecting in the pageFlow attribute.

Hi Bob
I didn't understand fully what you are trying here. Could you please clarify?
I assume that you have a Array of NodeId objects.
Lets say:
Public NodeId[] nodeids = new NodeIds[10];
and you want a checkBoxGroup mapped to NodeId[]
and have as many checkBoxOption as number of elements in array with value as NodeId(i).nodeId
Is this assumption correct?
If the above is correct then the code snippet you have pasted is wrong in the sense that checkBoxGroup datasource is the array but the Option value is the main repeater item's nodeId which is wrong.
The container.item would not access anything within the pageflow variable.
I will post a sample in the next one
Vimala-

PO changes not reflecting in the SAP R/3 system in Extended classsic

Hi Guys,
I have a querry regards to deletion of a PO line item in Extended classic scenario Version 5.0. User has deleted the line item in the shopping cart and now the status of the shopping cart is with Zero value and line item deleted, but in the PO there is a line item with some Value and we are trying to delete it and save it, it gets deleted and PO status it shows as awaiting approval. but at the Item level of the PO the check box of Item deletion is updated. which means PO line item is deleted.
Now my querry is the status of the PO in the SRM shows a awaiting approval and this is not in approval tab but at the header level when I try to search the PO with PO display/change option. Also its not reflecting with the deleted item in R/3 system.
Please help me.
Regards
Srujank

Hi
Check configuration of your Message server. check if your message server is configured properly. Just go to your SAP logon. Select the system say "DEV" and click on groups.Then Click on System id and enter the id as "ID1" in your case.
and then enter the machine name in the message server box and then click on generate list. If your message server is configured correctly you would get some groups in the list below. only if that comes then go to SLD and check in the ABap technical system if you have configured technical system using the proper logon groups.
Then you should not face this problem. Let me know if you require more information.
regards
ravi

Change in one vairable is not reflected in the other variable

Question/ Objective / Doubt:
during the execution of the program ,change in the member/variable of the class is not reflected in the other variable which is the dependent variable of the previous one;
Program / code:
class Simple {
     static int [][] valOne;
     static int [][] valTwo; //values depends on ?a? values
     // static int [][] valTwo=Library.different(valOne); this doesn't work
     // static { valTwo=Library.different(ValOne); } // this doesn't fulfill what i expect
     Simple(int a[][]){
       valOne=a;
       ValTwo=Library.different(a); //say some static method
     void change(int r,int c,int n){
       //one of the ValOne is changed
       valOne[r][c]=n;
class Library{
     static int [][]different(int num[][]){
          //some computations
          return intArr;//returns a values with respect to the incoming variable
Description / Explanation:
during execution:
when change method is invoked to change valOne ; I want this change to be reflected in valTwo But this does not happen.....as valTwo in initialised only in the constructor
My Try / My Effort:
// static int [][] valTwo=Library.different(valOne); //this doesn't fulfill
// static { valTwo=Library.different(valOne); } // this doesn't fulfill
i declared variable as static so that this would solve the problem..
sorry if there any wrong in naming convention...
Jesh
Share knowledge; Grow together;
Edited by: java_jesh on Dec 14, 2007 2:02 PM

it seems u are scolding me . my above comment is after seen this program
// Demonstrate static variables, methods, and blocks.
class UseStatic {
static int a = 3;
static int b;
static void meth(int x) {
    System.out.println("x = " + x);
    System.out.println("a = " + a);
    System.out.println("b = " + b);
static {
    System.out.println("Static block initialized.");
    b = a * 4;
public static void main(String args[]) {
    meth(42);
output:
Static block initialized
x=42
a=3
b=12
i like to know more. that's why i am continuing even after the objective is solved
Edited by: java_jesh on Dec 14, 2007 3:27 PM

UI Screen Configs not reflecting on the web

For doing screen configuration, when I click on the frame to configure, the system is picking up std key and not the custom key zpartman though zpartman key is there in the list. ( Note: Zpartman key is the one assigned to this role ). Therefore if I do config in zpartman key, it's not reflecting on the web. Please reply what could be the reason and the solution.
Thanks
TR

Hi TR
first access the standard and check the configuration info such as what is the configuration key , object and subobject .
Then access your custom configuration screen and check what it was looking for and what is it picked , change your custom configuration accordingly what it was looking for (by making changes to configuration key, object and sub object).
Check that you are accessing in the same client if not transport the request to other client using SCC1 transaction.
Thanks & Regards
Raj

Excise duty value on sales invoice not reflecting in the actual cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for