Excluding some objects Solution Documentation Assistant Analysis

Is there a way to exclude certain objects ( transaction codes/programs etc .. for example SE* ) while running an Analysis in SolDocA ? We have numerous Informatica generated objects that need to go into this exclusion list. The intention is that these objects wont appear in the Analysis report. The names of these objects are like ZDW####.
Any help is appreciated.

Hi Rony,
The Solution Documentation Assistant(SDA) Analysis is based on an Analysis Project which has been created e.g. from a Solution Manager project. Assuming that your transactions etc. for which you won't perform an Analysis for are assigned only to certain business processes or scenarios, you might exclude these structures and sub-structures during the creation of an Analysis Project. With regards to the report you can exclude such objects for the structure results as described above. As the report contains also objects from the Analysis Summary, you would need to remove the whole section or the few tables or the entries you don't want to have in manually from a copy of the report. In case you want to have a list without such objects from a summary table you might use filter functions before doing the export of the table.
Best regards,
Andreas

Similar Messages

Solution Documentation Assistant: RBPD

RBPD (Reverse Business Process Documentation) - Is this possibly only with Solman 7.1 or can this be performed using Solman 7.0 as well?
Does anyone have a "How-to" on this function using Solution Documentation Assistant?
Any inputs, documentation, materials, etc. is highly appreciated.
Thank you

I have repeatedly been told that using Solman 7.0 a BPH (with tcodes and img objects mapped) can be created using workload data from EWA. Is this true?
Yes, plz see my response below
Now assume that there is no Template/Implementation project in the Solman 7.0 system that contains any business process structure. Is this possible?
Here is path for how to go about it:
Even if you do not have an implementation/template project you have some documentation that contains information about what was done to test the implementation? Something like a test script i.e. an Integration Test Script.
Just create some mock project and select the most revelant business scenario from the Business Process Repository (a.k.a BPR - The preconfigured out of the box scenario list that SAP delivers with SolMan) that you want to reverse engineer, for example Order to Cash process. Now you must have some scripts with you, that will act as the path to show u what transactions you run in your business process like VA01 , VA02 etc...
As a next step, Now use the BPR and the test script as a starting point to define your project. and then run the SoDoCa to do its analysis for the same project and there will be an option to update your SolMan project within the SoDoCa workcenter. The work is iterative and will require the O2C configurator's assistance at one point, even though you have a test script with you.
Since you use the BPR hte configuration comes out of the box, which explains how SAP attempts to let you reverse engineer.
There will be possible gaps and it will require continuous review eventually, which is part of keeping up the Business process documentation current.
If so, can you direct me to specific documentation? I couldn't find this in the solman-rkt link for 7.0.
I believe the RKT documentation does not have this information and in the ramp up process we were told about this being available in 7.1 with more added functionality.

RFC Authorization to run Solution Documentation Assistant

New to Solution Manager. While trying to run SolDocA for tcodes and custom programs against production I am getting the RFC error "No authorization to log on as a trusted system". I am trying to find out what is the minimum authorization I should ask for ? Any feed back is really appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
try to access SAPOSS connection in SM59,
SU01 for user lock,
Add S_RFCACL and S_RFC access to all of the users in Solution Manager
you can use below document for trouble shooting purpose.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Security/BestPractice-HowtoanalyzeandsecureRFC+connections
regards
Nagaraju

Solution Document Assistant

Hi,
I want to use RBE(Reverse Business Functionality) in SAP.
I know that Solution Document Assistant in solution manager EHP1.0 is similar like RBE.
I am having Solution manager EHP 1.0 installed.
I am not aware of how to configure solution documentation assistant.
Can anyone guide me with the step by step configuration document??
Waiting for any help...................
Regards.
Chandresh.

Hi Chandresh,
For utilising Solution Documentation Assistant, don't forget the pre-requisites that I have mentioned in this thread:
Re: Solution Documentation Assistant Pre-requisites??
To access the Assistant, you need to browse to the WorkCenter.
For more information go to:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/b3/64c33af662c514e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://service.sap.com/solutionmanager > media library > technical documentation > solution documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/b3/64c33af662c514e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this helps,
Regards,
-Rohan

GRC10 Exclude Objects (Roles) - Batch Risk Analysis Job

All -
We are setting up some non-production GRC 10.1 systems at this time and are trying to exclude project roles from our dashboards via the "Maintain Exclude Objects for Batch Risk Analysis" table [SPRO --> GRC --> AC --> ARA --> Batch Risk Analysis].
The problem that we are encountering is that this Batch Risk Analysis is taking an extremely long time to run on our Project Users even though we have excluded the project roles that these users are assigned.
For example, User A has 3 project roles which hit a very large number of SoD violations in our rule set, however in the exclusion list we have defined the three roles the user is assigned to be in the exclusion table for All systems and for the specific system that the job is running against. With no luck. The job still takes an average of 30 minutes to run on each user even though the roles they are assigned are excluded.
We have tested that the exclusion table works because we can exclude the users by adding them to this table and we can also exclude the groups that they are in and this also works. However we have instances where there are other users in this groups that have other roles in addition to these excluded roles that need to be checked.
Does anyone have any recommendations for how to excluded roles so that the job quickly checks the users with these roles? It is my understanding that if the roles are in the exclusion list they should be skipped by the Batch Risk Analysis job which is running to check these users for the dashboards.
Thanks,
Darnell

Hi,
Was a solution found for this error?
Thanks,
Glen

Documentation Assistant - No Logical Component exists for this analysis

Hi
Whe trying to create a analysis with in solution manager documentation assistant i get the error messaage
No logical component exists for this analysis , verify the analysis project.
Can anyone tell me how i can solve this,
Thanks
Barry

Hi Barry,
To solve this issue, you may try steps described below:
1. Call Transaction 'SOLMAN_DIRECTORY'
2. Select your source Solution via single click.
3. In detail panel, check if there is any valid Logical component in the
'System Group' Tab.
4. Add related Logical Component to the Solution, make sure there is val
id System for at least one role ( Development System e.g. )
5. Save your Solution.
6. Try to create Analysis Project from that Solution again and afterward
screate an Analysis.
Hope such information can help you solve such issue.
Kind regards,
Fabricius

Error while executing the Job for Objects :null Batch Risk Analysis

Hi All,
We've recently upgraded Virsa to version 5.3_14 . I'm encountering a problem when executing the Batch Risk Analysis job for users, roles and profiles. The job does not complete for some objects and it seems to be sporadic and shows this error: -
Background Job History: job id=395, status=2, message=Error while executing the Job for Object(s) :ABROWN:null
I've attached the log for your review.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Linda Lewis
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:53 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.meng.ObjAuthMatcher <init>
FINEST: ObjAuthMatcher constructed: 4ms, #singles=2141, #ranges=0, #super=0
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisEngine riskAnalysis
WARNING: Job ID:395 : Failed to run Risk Analysis
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1019)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.RuleLoader.getPermRule(RuleLoader.java:573)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisEngine.performActPermAnalysis(AnalysisEngine.java:1609)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisEngine.riskAnalysis(AnalysisEngine.java:321)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BatchRiskAnalysis.performBatchRiskAnalysis(BatchRiskAnalysis.java:1166)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BatchRiskAnalysis.performBatchSyncAndAnalysis(BatchRiskAnalysis.java:1464)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob.runJob(BgJob.java:560)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob.run(BgJob.java:363)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisDaemonBgJob.scheduleJob(AnalysisDaemonBgJob.java:375)
at com.virsa.cc.xsys.riskanalysis.AnalysisDaemonBgJob.start(AnalysisDaemonBgJob.java:92)
at com.virsa.cc.comp.BgJobInvokerView.wdDoModifyView(BgJobInvokerView.java:444)
at com.virsa.cc.comp.wdp.InternalBgJobInvokerView.wdDoModifyView(InternalBgJobInvokerView.java:1236)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.generation.DelegatingView.doModifyView(DelegatingView.java:78)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.progmodel.view.View.modifyView(View.java:337)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.ClientComponent.doModifyView(ClientComponent.java:481)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.doModifyView(WindowPhaseModel.java:551)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WindowPhaseModel.processRequest(WindowPhaseModel.java:148)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.window.WebDynproWindow.processRequest(WebDynproWindow.java:335)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.cal.AbstractClient.executeTasks(AbstractClient.java:143)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ApplicationSession.doProcessing(ApplicationSession.java:332)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessingStandalone(ClientSession.java:741)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doApplicationProcessing(ClientSession.java:694)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.ClientSession.doProcessing(ClientSession.java:253)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.clientserver.session.RequestManager.doProcessing(RequestManager.java:149)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doContent(DispatcherServlet.java:62)
at com.sap.tc.webdynpro.serverimpl.defaultimpl.DispatcherServlet.doGet(DispatcherServlet.java:46)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:386)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:364)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:1039)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:265)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:207)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:104)
at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:176)
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
FINEST: Lock:1004
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock unlock
FINEST: Unlock:1004
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BatchRiskAnalysis performBatchRiskAnalysis
WARNING: Error: while executing BatchRiskAnalysis for JobId=395 and object(s):ABROWN: Skipping error to continue with next object: null Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BgJob updateJobHistory
FINEST: --- @@@@@@@@@@@ Updating the Job History -
2@@Msg is Error while executing the Job for Object(s) :ABROWN:null
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.dao.BgJobHistoryDAO insert
INFO: -
Background Job History: job id=395, status=2, message=Error while executing the Job for Object(s) :ABROWN:null
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
FINEST: Lock:1004
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock unlock
FINEST: Unlock:1004
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.bg.BatchRiskAnalysis performBatchRiskAnalysis
INFO: --- BKG User Permission Analysis (System: P20:020) completed --- elapsed time: 4522 ms
Feb 9, 2011 1:47:54 PM com.virsa.cc.xsys.util.Lock lock
Edited by: Linda Lewis on Feb 9, 2011 9:08 PM

Hi,
Was a solution found for this error?
Thanks,
Glen

How to suppress compiler errors without excluding database objects from the "Schema Compare" tool (using VS2013/SSDT)

Hi,
In short: How to suppress compiler errors without excluding the object from the "Schema Compare" tool ??
A bit longer:
We have a SQL Server 2008 project in Visual Studio 2013 running SQL Server Data Tool.
An old database, with a lot of history in, has been imported into SSDT and there are many syntax errors preventing the project from compiling/running. An typical error is: "SQL70001: This statement is not recognized in this context".
Running the "faulty" scripts on the server, executes just fine. I understand that there are syntax errors and they should be rewritten, but it's not gonna happen just like that - it is a slow process over a long period of time.
I know it is possible to change Build Action to None, but that also exclude the object from appearing in the Schema Compare function/window.
So - how to ignore some compiler errors and still having the objects to appear when doing "Schema Compare" ??
Thank you in advance.

Hi Steven,
Thanks for your comments.
Well, it sure does help in the future, but right now i would prefer the other way - to suppress some errors and still allow the scripts to build.
The thing is that if we "rewrite" the objects into create scripts, then we have a huge test job ahead of us + the database environments (PROD vs DEV and UAT) does not share the same AD or DB users and therefore grants is lost if dropping/creating
objects, right!
If you drop a object before creating it, the drop will also drop the roles and grants and since they don't share user table, the create will not be able to add the permissions again. There might be a solution to that, but it is going to be very complicated
for some newbies like us. We need something we can trust.
BR
Peter

Can't scale the objects. The requested transformation would make some objects too small to use.

How does one remedy this Adobe error message? "Can't scale the objects. The requested transformation would make some objects too small to use." This one always gets me. I'll spend more time trying to find the object in question. This has happened in almost al versions, but this time it's CS5.

Hmm, possible solution would be to select your object(s), scale them to 90%, and then hit Cmd+D or Control+D to repeat the transformation. I read that sometimes if you scale down too much and too fast it can cause this message.
Hope this works for you!
Michael

CN41 Report with excluding some cost

Hi,
Basically CN41 report shows object wise cost/revenue/commitment/budget for one or more number of projects. Is it possible to show the SAP Standard Report CN41 with excluding some cost against any object (WBSE/Activity/Activity Element). Thats is it might be excluding the cost incurred on some specific cost elements. I can achieve it with cost element report but can it be done with CN41/CN41N report ?
Or
Any Standard cost elements report with Cost/ Revenue/ Commitment details where i can exclude perticular cost elements ??
Is there any parameters we can set in DP profile/Selection profile. But this requirement should be available only for a specific user Ids not for all users.
Thanks & Regards,
Hari Krishna.K

maybe T-Code s_alr_87013543 or cji3 helps.
try doing.
rgds
Edited by: robert lion on Aug 31, 2009 10:06 PM

Errors of Solution Document Assistant

Dear experts!
I run Analyses based on Analysis Project 'ZTEST_DEV_00001' in work center "Solution Document Assistant". My project has standard SAP business scenarios in SOLAR01. EWA is adjusted in system SW0.
But on the 3rd step I have errors:
1. Check steps of type 'Transaction' cannot be performed in the system.
2. No workload data in EWA service sessions for system 'SW0'
3. Workload statistics data can not be retrieved directly via RFC 'SM_SW0CLNT208_TMW'
4. Workload statistics data not available in system SW0
What should I make to get rid of errors?

Hi Dmitry,
I have the same problem.
Did you solve this problem at that time? What was the cause of errors?
Thanks for your answer.

How to exclude some tables from schema level replicatio????

Hi,
I am working on oracle10g stream replication.
My replication type is "Schema Based".
So can anyone assist me to undersatnd, how to exclude some tables from schema based replication.
Thanks,
Faziarain

You can use rules and include them in the rule set, lets say you dont want LCR to be queued for table_1 in schema SALES, write two rules one for DDL and another for DML with NOT logical condition.
DBMS_RULE_ADM.CREATE_RULE(
rule_name => 'admin.SALES_not_TALBE_1_dml', condition => ' (:dml.get_object_owner() = ''SALES'' AND NOT ' ||
' :dml.get_object_name() = ''REGIONS'') AND ' ||
' :dml.is_null_tag() = ''Y'' ');
DBMS_RULE_ADM.CREATE_RULE(
rule_name => 'admin.hr_not_regions_dlll',
condition => ' (:dml.get_object_owner() = ''SALES'' AND NOT ' ||
' :ddl.get_object_name() = ''table_!'') AND ' ||
' :dsl.is_null_tag() = ''Y'' ');
just go through this document once, http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28321/strms_rules.htm#i1017376
Edited by: user8710159 on Sep 16, 2009 5:21 PM

MacBookPro AirportCard excludes some UK channels

Initially when my MacBook Pro couldn't see wifi networks that other Mac and PC users could, I thought that my laptop was just less sensitive to the signals. But then at the building where I work, while everybody I asked got a strong signal from the in-house wifi network, it didn't even show on my MacBook Pro.
At a cafe full of happy surfers, the café's network doesn't show on my MacBook Pro. At another café I manage to get online but after a brief sleep (the MacBook Pro, not me) the network doesn't show.
It turns out that the airport card in my 17" MacBook Pro (bought in the UK and used only in the UK and Ireland) frequently changes to country codes other than "GB". These include "DE" and "AT" but most frequently it selects the code "US" and therefore excludes some UK wifi channels.
When at my apartment I can simply connect to my router by cable or keep my Airport Express on a US channel.
However, away from my apartment, when my Airport decides to set itself to "US", it is impossible to see or connect to some UK channels. As one cannot manually reset the Airport card to "GB" I have to carry my old PowerBook G4 with me as well in order to access the internet. It is both cumbersome and time-consuming to have to transfer images from my new MacBook Pro to my old PowerBook G4 just to be able to email them.
That's not a solution. What is?
Thanks
dex

I can't find some objects in ID PI 7.3

Hi All.
I have installed PI 7.3.
So, there are not the objects ( process component, receiver determination, receiver rule, interface determination, sender agreement, receiver agreement, direct connection ) in ID. But there are the others ( party, communication, integrated configuration,configuration scenario,value mapping group).
Kindly let me know on the cause and how to troubleshoot this error.
Regards
A.A

Here is the solution.
If there are several objects missing in the cache or if there is an error in transaction SXI_CACHE, you should execute a delta or full cache refresh. You do this using the menu XI Runtime Cache  Start Delta Cache Refresh or Start Complete Cache Refresh in transaction SXI_CACHE. You should always try the delta cache refresh first as the complete cache refresh requires more time and resources.
If there is only a problem with some objects, it is possible to refresh only these objects in the cache. To do so, call the Integration Builder Directory and/or Repository, make a dummy change in the mapping object, and save and activate. Then, check the Cache Notification Table (menu entry Environment  Cache Notifications) and the object in transaction SXI_CACHE or in the cache monitoring in the Runtime Workbench.
Regards
Pothana

Excluding some computers from Active Directory System Discovery

Hi,
I am trying to exclude some computers from Active Directory System Discovery. I created a new Organizational Unit for those excluded computers and that OU is NOT under the OU that I am discovering in the OU hierarchy. I specified the location
to be discovered under the Active Directory System Discovery properties. However, it is still discovering the computers that I wanna exclude from the discovery. I deleted those computers from console manually and run the discovery again, it still
discovers them.
What I might be doing wrong?
Thanks
Yavuz Selim Atmaca

Hi,
If you check under properties on the object, you can see which discovery agent is discovering the reasource, it could be the Group Discovery as well. That is where I would start to troubleshoot it.
Regards,
Jörgen
-- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
@ccmexec

Excluding some objects Solution Documentation Assistant Analysis

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for