Exclusão em massa de DEPÓSITOS associados ao CADASTRO DE ITEM

Bom dia experts!
Estou com um problema resultante de um processo que necessito alterar.
Em um processo de implantação, o cliente utilizou a configuração de TODOS OS DEPÓSITOS PARA TODOS OS ITENS. Ou seja, em um universo de 5000 itens, tenho 150 DEPÓSITOS pendurados em todos eles.
A questão é que, a medida que este processo vai aumentando (o número de itens vai aumentando no banco de dados) também aumentam os registros na tabela OITW e estou com receio disto causar algum problema para mim. Também está gerando contabilizações incorretas, já que até mesmo depósitos de processos de despesas podem ser selecionados na compra, por exemplo.
Gostaria de saber se existe algum processo em que eu possa tentar reduzir os depósitos de um determinado item ou grupamento de item, sem precisar excluir cada depósito um a um do CADASTRO DE ITEM.
Agradeço antecipadamente pelo retorno.
Leandro Martins
Consultor
[email protected]
www.updatesolution.com.br

Wesley Honorato,
O meu problema não é bem este, o meu cliente apenas cadastrou um depósito incorretamente, mas só de efetuar o cadastro do depósito este já aparece no cadastro dos itens para que se o usuário desejar configurar este como depósito padrão, porém nada foi feito, nem movimentação nem seleção de depósito padrão, nada mesmo. Porém o sistema bloqueia a exclusão desse depósito, fazendo-se necessário a entrada item a item do cadastro de inventário para a exclusão da linha que contém este depósito na aba estoque do cadastro de itens, o que gera um imenso trabalho. Gostaria apenas de saber se tem um jeito menos trabalhoso de se fazer essa exclusão. Obrigado
André Maia

Similar Messages

Mensagem de erro ao incluir uma conta no Depósito Geral

Depois de configurado as contas contábeis, as contas de determinação do "Depósito Geral" não foram preenchidas. Ao preencher as contas aparece a mensagem:
"Falta atualizar taxa de câmbio ' Contas de estoque'.
Todas as contas de determinação estão configuradas, porém o a mensagem aparece.
Por favor, alguem saberia me dizer o que seria esse erro ?
Obrigado.
Jair

Prezado Jair,
para um melhor entendimento acerca desta questão, peço a gentileza de indicar, passo a passo, o que esta sendo feito bem como a mensagem de erro retornada pelo sistema. Caso seja possível, inclua a mensagem de erro em inglês também.
Aguardo seu retorno para poder reproduzir o seu cenário.
Atenciosamente,
Wesley

Controle de Item por Conta de Depósito

Pessoal, boa tarde.
     É possível optarmos pelo tratamento do controle de um item cadastrado conforme print abaixo? Onde teremos que controla-lo pelo estoque e em alguns documentos de marketing não deve ser feita alteração no estoque, pois o mesmo foi utilizado de terceiros e apenas precisamos lança-lo numa nota fiscal sem alterar o estoque.
Obrigado.

Bom dia Arthur,
No sistema você consegue alterar na linha da nota o depósito, só que isso dependerá do usuário que fará a nota (na imagem Wip99).
O que você pode fazer pra deixar automatizado, é criar uma consulta formatada que altere o campo pra você, por exemplo,, Venda escolha depósito X, quando for remessa, depósito Y.
Exemplo
Eu fiz uma regra assim na entrada de estoque, toda entrada deve ser feita no depósito LAM e não no WIP99.
A consulta DMK - Produção - Depósito.
SELECT ISNULL(
   (SELECT T1.[WhsCode]
   FROM OITW T1
   WHERE T1.ItemCode = T0.Itemcode and T1.Locked <> 'Y' and T1.[WhsCode] like 'LAM%' AND SUBSTRING($[$21.0.0],1,3) = 'PRO')
   ISNULL(
   (SELECT T1.[WhsCode]
   FROM OITW T1
   WHERE T1.ItemCode = T0.Itemcode and T1.Locked <> 'Y' and T1.[WhsCode] like 'FT%'),
    T0.DfltWH)
   ) as Deposito
   FROM OITM T0 WHERE T0.ItemCode = $[$13.1.0]
Esse é só um exemplo
Abraço
Fabio.

Mass Removal of Billing Block at Sales Order item level

Dear Experts,
Does any one know how to remove billing block at sales order item level at mass level ?
Is there any standard t code for the same. Kindly let me know the same
thnx in advanve
regards,
Sagar

Hi Sagar Wagh,
I want to make a little correction,
Go to T-code V.23
Give your criteria like
Sales organization
Distribution channel
Division
Then in the last of screen there is check box Delete billing block
check this box and excute
System will ask you
Do you really want to delete billing
blocks for all docs. to be selected?
Click at yes
System will show you the list of all documents
Select all and Click at Delete billing block
System will delete the billing block in one go from all the documents.
Regards,
MT
Edited by: M T on Feb 23, 2010 6:03 PM

Any T.code for Mass application of rejection reason for Sales Order Item

Hi
Is there any Transaciton code to apply the Rejection of Reason for the Sales Order Item level.
Regards
AVS

Check T.Code: MASS
Object: BUS2032
Alternatively it is recommended to use LSMW.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

Tcode MASS does not work if more than one item in contract

Hi,
I need to update the contract zone of a PO. Via tcode ME22N, this zone is disabled, so i cannot fill my contract in the PO using this tcode.
I tried tcode MASS which works only if the contract has only one item.
Can anyone help please?
Thanks in advance

HI Anu,
Good to KNow that you are able to do it by Mass
In Mass for Multiple Line Item to update to Multiple line item PO
Just go to MASS
Select the option BUS2012 (Purchase orders)
and in the select the poline item EKPO
And enter the PO Number along with the Item Number in the entry screen and execute it .
But for the Contract also enter the option
Outline Agreement -- for the contract number
Principal Agmt Item-- for the contract item number
Enter the above against the PO and its item number combination it works.
As suggested earlier please check the Screen layout option also.which would be more easy way,
Check the PO Screen layout-Field settings. at the Document type level mainatained in the config.
against the
Hope so this would help.
Regards
Anjanna

Scanning in Acrobat 9.2 Results in Windows DEP Closing Acrobat

I started having this issue about a month ago and have done some systematic testing regarding this. First some particulars:
OS = Windows XP SP3, all updates installed and current.
Scanner = RICOH IS330DC with TWAIN driver
Adobe Acrobat Pro 8.x and 9.2 (see S.O.E below for explanation)
Scanning operations were typicaly done through AA using the scanners "Native" interface. MSOffice Document Scanning was also used.
Sequence of Events:
Installed WXP aprox. June of 2008, have been installing all updates automaticaly
Installed AA 8.x at the same time, installing all updates as they are released.
Performed scanning operations on a daily basis of over a year with NO DEP errors (thousands of scan operations on a daily basis)
Scanning operations slowed beginning of October of 2009 but still had not received any DEP errors.
Scanning resumed November 5, 2009. Started scanning process from within AA (Create new PDF from...Scanner). AA scan dialogue window opened, selected scan button. Waited for Adobe to open "Native" scanner interface. Received the following message instead: "To help protect your computer, Windows has closed this program".
Attempted to scan with AA 9.2 NOT using native scanner interface, received identical result.
Upgraded to AA 9.2, on November 10, 2009
Scanned a document both with and without using "Native" scanner interface. No change in DEP message.
Attempted to add AA 9.2 to "exclusion" list in DEP settings (OptIn setting). I did not receive the message regarding DEP "must be enabled for Adobe Acrobat" that some have reported (possibly specific to Vista/W7 installations?). Although windows allowed adding AA to DEP exclusion list, results were the same. Note that when adding items to the DEP exclusion list, it will only allow the addition of ".exe" (executables). I have not been able to find a way of adding .dll files or any other extension types.
Scanned a document using MS Office Document Scanning feature and using scanner "Native" interface. NO DEP MESSAGES RECEIVED.
Scanned a document using MS Office Document Scanning feature WITHOUT using scanner "Native" interface. NO DEP MESSAGES RECEIVED.
Disabling DEP (AlwaysOff) does resolve the problem but is NOT recommended as DEP is a critical security feature. As such this work-around is NOT acceptable.
The results of the testing were:
Windows and specificaly DEP are allowing the Microsoft supplpied MS Office Document Scanning utility to use the same RICOH supplied drivers and "Native" scanner interface that DEP is NOT allowing Adobe Acrobat to use. Simply put, even though in WXP I can add Acrobat 9.2 to the exclusion list, Windows DEP still will not allow Acrobat 9.2 to exectue programs or drivers on it's own. Which is why I believe this is not a RICOH driver issue but either a Microsoft issue or Adobe issue or most likely Microsoft having an issue with Adobe Acrobat.
Yes, a workaround would be to use MS Document Scanning and right now that is what I am having to do. However I find it terribly inconvenient that I have to go an extra step to convert thousands of pages of text from tiff to pdf. when I have paid hundreds of dollars for Acrobat to do it directly to .pdf . Besides, the custom programming and batch job features I use and rely on were developed specificaly for Acrobat and REQUIRE me to use it and not some other utility. It is simply NOT cost effective for me to use MS Document Scanning and still be able to provide the services I provide.
My questions are these:
Is Adobe actively addressing this issue?
Why is MS Office Document Scanning able to use the scanner drivers and dialogue window when Adobe Acrobat can not? Why is MS Windows specificaly identifying secondary code execution by Adobe Acrobat as a problem while secondary code execution by MS office is considered acceptable?
What happened over the last three months that suddenly made DEP aware of Adobe Acrobat being untrustworthy in regards to code execution where as before it WAS trustworthy, at least in regards to Windows XP installations.
Prior to this issue I had NEVER even heard of DEP (again Windows XP user). Did Microsoft release a DEP upgrade to Windows XP users that we were not aware of? Did Microsoft include DEP as a new feature in a recent WXP SP3 security update (over the last three months) and this is why we are seeing this now?
Regardless of When DEP was released and for who (WXP, Vista, W7), my questions #1 and #2 are still valid. Can someone at Adobe please address this?

I started having this issue about a month ago and have done some systematic testing regarding this. First some particulars:
OS = Windows XP SP3, all updates installed and current.
Scanner = RICOH IS330DC with TWAIN driver
Adobe Acrobat Pro 8.x and 9.2 (see S.O.E below for explanation)
Scanning operations were typicaly done through AA using the scanners "Native" interface. MSOffice Document Scanning was also used.
Sequence of Events:
Installed WXP aprox. June of 2008, have been installing all updates automaticaly
Installed AA 8.x at the same time, installing all updates as they are released.
Performed scanning operations on a daily basis of over a year with NO DEP errors (thousands of scan operations on a daily basis)
Scanning operations slowed beginning of October of 2009 but still had not received any DEP errors.
Scanning resumed November 5, 2009. Started scanning process from within AA (Create new PDF from...Scanner). AA scan dialogue window opened, selected scan button. Waited for Adobe to open "Native" scanner interface. Received the following message instead: "To help protect your computer, Windows has closed this program".
Attempted to scan with AA 9.2 NOT using native scanner interface, received identical result.
Upgraded to AA 9.2, on November 10, 2009
Scanned a document both with and without using "Native" scanner interface. No change in DEP message.
Attempted to add AA 9.2 to "exclusion" list in DEP settings (OptIn setting). I did not receive the message regarding DEP "must be enabled for Adobe Acrobat" that some have reported (possibly specific to Vista/W7 installations?). Although windows allowed adding AA to DEP exclusion list, results were the same. Note that when adding items to the DEP exclusion list, it will only allow the addition of ".exe" (executables). I have not been able to find a way of adding .dll files or any other extension types.
Scanned a document using MS Office Document Scanning feature and using scanner "Native" interface. NO DEP MESSAGES RECEIVED.
Scanned a document using MS Office Document Scanning feature WITHOUT using scanner "Native" interface. NO DEP MESSAGES RECEIVED.
Disabling DEP (AlwaysOff) does resolve the problem but is NOT recommended as DEP is a critical security feature. As such this work-around is NOT acceptable.
The results of the testing were:
Windows and specificaly DEP are allowing the Microsoft supplpied MS Office Document Scanning utility to use the same RICOH supplied drivers and "Native" scanner interface that DEP is NOT allowing Adobe Acrobat to use. Simply put, even though in WXP I can add Acrobat 9.2 to the exclusion list, Windows DEP still will not allow Acrobat 9.2 to exectue programs or drivers on it's own. Which is why I believe this is not a RICOH driver issue but either a Microsoft issue or Adobe issue or most likely Microsoft having an issue with Adobe Acrobat.
Yes, a workaround would be to use MS Document Scanning and right now that is what I am having to do. However I find it terribly inconvenient that I have to go an extra step to convert thousands of pages of text from tiff to pdf. when I have paid hundreds of dollars for Acrobat to do it directly to .pdf . Besides, the custom programming and batch job features I use and rely on were developed specificaly for Acrobat and REQUIRE me to use it and not some other utility. It is simply NOT cost effective for me to use MS Document Scanning and still be able to provide the services I provide.
My questions are these:
Is Adobe actively addressing this issue?
Why is MS Office Document Scanning able to use the scanner drivers and dialogue window when Adobe Acrobat can not? Why is MS Windows specificaly identifying secondary code execution by Adobe Acrobat as a problem while secondary code execution by MS office is considered acceptable?
What happened over the last three months that suddenly made DEP aware of Adobe Acrobat being untrustworthy in regards to code execution where as before it WAS trustworthy, at least in regards to Windows XP installations.
Prior to this issue I had NEVER even heard of DEP (again Windows XP user). Did Microsoft release a DEP upgrade to Windows XP users that we were not aware of? Did Microsoft include DEP as a new feature in a recent WXP SP3 security update (over the last three months) and this is why we are seeing this now?
Regardless of When DEP was released and for who (WXP, Vista, W7), my questions #1 and #2 are still valid. Can someone at Adobe please address this?

Mass change of Vendor Line Items Payment Terms

Hi all
We are trying to make a mass change of payment terms for vendor line items. We have implemented the change required as per SAP note 640908. However when we try to do this not all payment terms are changed.
The log gives us the following error - 'Field BSEG-ZTERM. does not exist in the screen SAPMF05L 1302'.
Please how can we solve this error.
Many thanks
PRG

Hi,
According to note 640908:
" Notes on error handling:
    If the mass change does not occur as required even though you
    changed and activated all program parts, note that the error log
    for the mass change (Environment -> Mass change -> Error log of
    line item list) may contain useful information for error
    handling."
" Note: SAP cannot guarantee that the modified mass change will work
correctly even if you carry out all of the steps as described in the
manual tasks."
It is not planned to enter the payment terms by using of
the field payment term ZTERM but by using of the fields ZBD1T/ZBD1P and
ZBD2T/ZBD2P and ZBD3T.
With Best Regards,
Gladys Xing

Mass update of Third Party Vendor at PO Line item pricing condition

Hi All,
We have requirement from business as follows:
We are using item level condition for Lumper Charge in PO and it is for Third Party Vendor. We maintain vendor in pricing condition record so it will be automatically populated while PO is created. Recently vendor is changed so we have also updated new vendor in pricing condition record so it will be taken care when new POs will be created. But there are thousand open POs in which new vendor needs to be updated.
Is there any way to mass update third party vendor at PO line item level?
Relevant pointers will be rewarded.
Regards,
Tt

Hi,
You may check the following options:
1. If the freight vendor was pulled through condition record, then change the vendor in the condition record and update the pricing in MEI1. Refer the KBA: 1819416 - Condition records not getting updated automatically when using MEI1/MEI4
2. If the condition is manual condition, there is no option to mass change the vendor in standard, as of my knowledge. You may create a custom program to change the vendor in the PO. Refer the similar thread: Mass update of freight vendor in PO condition
Regards,
AKPT

Alternate BAPI for BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT - Mass creation

We are trying to mass create Schedule lines for the SD contract items through the BAPI "BAPI_SALESDOCUMENT_CHANGE". The performance is very slow for bulk items.
This scedule line creation is equivalent to creating scedule lines through the transaction VA42.
Is there any alternate function module or BAPI for mass creation of schedule lines for the SD contract?

Depends on your release: in ECC 6.0 i have BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2
Nevermind: it's contracts not salesorder.
Try BAPI_CUSTOMERCONTRACT_CHANGE or do a F4 on BAPICONTRACT
Edited by: Maen Anachronos on Sep 16, 2010 1:19 PM

HOW TO MAKE CHECK BOXES EXCLUSIVE IN MULTI ROW BLOCK

Hi,
I have a multi row block with one item as check box.It is
required that at a time only one record can be marked as
selected through this item. If user marks a record as selected
the previous selected record should be marked as deselected.
How i can make these check boxes mutually exclusive ?
can anybody help me?
Thanks in Adv
Sharath.
null

SHARATH (guest) wrote:
: Hi,
: I have a multi row block with one item as check box.It is
: required that at a time only one record can be marked as
: selected through this item. If user marks a record as selected
: the previous selected record should be marked as deselected.
: How i can make these check boxes mutually exclusive ?
: can anybody help me?
: Thanks in Adv
: Sharath.
Hi
The check box can not be mutually exclusive.
This is a basic functionality.
You convert this item type into radio button.
It will satisfy your requirements.
Jeya Raman R
null

'Carry-out Mass changes in Equipment/Functional Locations

Dear Experts,
Through one SCN thread, I came to know that there is a functionality namely 'Carry-out Mass changes' in the GOTO menu in the List editing ALV screens of Equipment/Functional Locations (IE05, IH08, IH06 etc)
But, I am not able to find any such (Carry out mass changes) function in any of the menu items in IE05, IH08, IH06 etc.
Can someone help clear this situation.
Regards
Jogeswara Rao

Hi
Can you check whether the following business function set were actviated
Business Function LOG_EAM_CI_1
Business function LOG_EAM_CI_2
Regards
thyagarajan

Enable Item Reservation Org Atrribute in Mass

Hi,
we need to enable the item attribute "Reservable" for the Org Item in mass, having issues with "Cannot enable as the item is already having shipping".
Thanks, Sameet

y

CEWB: BOM item Mass change new value Missing

Hi Guru's
When i plan to do BOM item lead time offset mass change in the (CEWB) Engineering Workbench,
i have selected the ITem and Column LT offset, and in entra when i select the mass change, system showing a error.
" no item selected", (new value and replace indicator is missing
.Can u help whether we need to apply any notes ?
Regards
GS
Edited by: GNANASEKARAN Suresh on Aug 1, 2011 4:40 AM
Edited by: GNANASEKARAN Suresh on Aug 1, 2011 4:51 AM

Upload screenshots of the step which you're taking in CEWB & the error you notice to some portal & paste the link here for a clear understanding.
Also which version of SAP you're working on & what is the support pack level ? (If you're not sure about it, then check with your system admin for the same).

Mass deletion of POs

Hi,
I want to delete POs for particular materials at item level in mass.
Means suppose in one PO we have 4 materials at item level as 10,20,30,40.
And I want to delete PO items for 10 and 30 for one PO and for another 20 and 40.
Then how to do this in MEMASSPO transaction as there I have not found any combination of POs with item levels.
We will have to enter POs and item levels separately which will may pick materials that I donu2019t want to delete in the particular PO.
Please assist me how to tackle this issue.

Hi:
You can do the mass deletion in MEMASSPO traxn code however in your case you wanted to delete some of the items in the PO and which will different in different PO's i.e. item 10 and 20 in PO no X and item 40 and 60 in Y PO. So you have two options:
1.MEMASSPO: Mass deletion
Here you select the "Purchase Order item" in tables tab,then you would enter the PO document numbers,system will lists all items in the PO however here you have to manually remove the all other line items which you don't wanted to delete,this is lot of manual work too.
2.WRITE "BDC":
You can have a BDC which would select the PO range as well as the PO line item numbers form the XLS file.
I would suggest you to go with BDC for this mass deletion.
Hope it would help you.
Cheers
Rahul
Awards plz.if helpful.

Exclusão em massa de DEPÓSITOS associados ao CADASTRO DE ITEM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for