Execute Actual distribution - KSV5

Hi,
Could some one tell me if there is a BAPI to execute the actual distribution. The regular way is with the transaction KSV5.
Your quick help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hello Tamma,
I have checked off Use Checkboxes and all boxes except Cross-fund and Cross-grant. The option 'Update All CO LIs" radio button to ensure all CO postings integrate back into the FI module documentation states;
Indicator:   Update All CO Line Items to FI Causes all CO line items that are generated with CO-internal allocations to be transferred into Financial Accounting. In this way, Controlling is reconciled with Financial Accounting.
Use   Setting this indicator can produce an undesirably large number of documents in Financial Accounting. SAP therefore recommends setting the indicator for test purposes only.
Would I really use this?   Anybody know how much undesirably large number of documents are produced?
Best regards

Similar Messages

Reversal of Actual Distribution (KSV5 or 4KE5) possible?

Hi Gurus,
Would it be possibtle to reverse actual distribution of expenses or income? If yes, what is the transaction code? If no, what is the premise for this?
Thanks and best regards

hi
this KSV5 Transaction itself have Reverse option in the Main menu

Journal not posting distribution KSV5.

Hello,
When we run Execute Actual Distribution (KSV5), the journal is displayed but the journal is not posting.
We have Real-time integration with CO active in SPRO Define variants for real-time integration.
Do distributions post to the General Ledger?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards

Hello Tamma,
I have checked off Use Checkboxes and all boxes except Cross-fund and Cross-grant. The option 'Update All CO LIs" radio button to ensure all CO postings integrate back into the FI module documentation states;
Indicator:   Update All CO Line Items to FI Causes all CO line items that are generated with CO-internal allocations to be transferred into Financial Accounting. In this way, Controlling is reconciled with Financial Accounting.
Use   Setting this indicator can produce an undesirably large number of documents in Financial Accounting. SAP therefore recommends setting the indicator for test purposes only.
Would I really use this?   Anybody know how much undesirably large number of documents are produced?
Best regards

Actual distribution in New-GL

When executing actual distribution in New-GL using t-code FAGLG35,
System didnu2019t generate PCA document related to it.
So I transferred FI document related to it to PCA document using t-code
1ke8.
How can I transfer FI data to PCA automatically when executing actual distribution?

Hi,
Accounting (EC-PCA) is generally intended to track the profitability of busines units, and therefore, does not automatically include balance sheet accounts. There are, however, many reasons that companies may want to record certain balance sheet items at the profit center level. Our company does this to be able to calculate net investment (AR, AP, inventory, fixed assets, etc) at the profit center level. Asset management has had a huge impact on our profitability, and being to track investment by profit center is part of that.
SAP provides a means for specifying balance sheet accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is done through customizing t-code: 3KEH - EC-PCA: Additional Balance Sheet and Profit + Loss Accounts.
3KEH allows you to set ranges of accounts to be tracked in PCA. This is generally set up during the implmentation of your SAP system, but you may find reasons to make modifications post go-live. If so, youu2019ll need to do this in your development system and transport it into production.
Possible Reasons for Modifying 3KEH
Adding new accounts outside of the ranges established in 3KEH
Deciding post go-live to track an account in PCA
Changing the Default Profit Center on an Account (Default Cost Center can be changed on cost elements in t-code: KA02)
Discovering an account that was missed during implementation. Use t-code: KE5T to compare FI balances with PCA balances.
Options for Adjusting Prior Balances
One of the big gotchas when bringing an existing account into PCA after it already has FI postings is that those postings do not automatically come over. Say youu2019ve discovered youu2019re out of balance between FI and PCA by using KE5T or some other reporting. You determine that it is a 3KEH problem, get your IT people to fix it in Dev and transport it forward. The errant account now shows up in PCA, but itu2019s still out in KE5T (PCA still shows a $0 balance). Thatu2019s because nothing happens with the old FI documents. Adding an account to PCA doesnu2019t automatically generate PCA documents for the missing FI docs, but that would be a neat trick!
So, what are your options?
9KE0 is always an option. The trick here is that the you may have missing FI docs where half of the entry was captured by PCA, while the piece youu2019re trying to fix wasnu2019t. So, now you need to make a one-sided entry to get everything square. To make one-sided entries in 9KE0, you need a document type that allows this. Configuration for this can be accomplished using t-code: GCBX. Just create a new Doc. Type and set the Bal. Check = 2 (no balance check). Thanks to Marco Jordyu2019s excellent article at FICOExpert for this tip.
Use 1KE8 to transfer FI documents to PCA. Again, Marcou2019s article has an excellent write-up on using 1KE8. He suggests that you use FBL3N to determine which documents have been posted to FI for the account you are fixing. Copy those document numbers into the multiple selection for document numbers in 1KE8, using the magical Import from text file button and Copy from clipboard. The big things to watch out for is that youu2019ll want to uncheck the u201CCheck for existing recordsu201D option and check the u201CReversalu201D option. This will prevent SAP from skipping FI documents that already have corresponding PCA documents. It doesnu2019t care that only half of the FI doc is in the PCA doc. It would skip it. Checking the u201CReversalu201D option causes SAP to reverse the existing PCA documents (most likely having only one side of the original FI docs posted) and repost the FI doc, except this time with both sides of the entry.
Final Words
This whole issue hopefully will be a rare occurance for you, but it can be a pain when it does. Particularly since you may have to wait for a fix in Dev and a transport. Itu2019s good to have a spreadsheet with your 3KEH table entries handy when youu2019re creating GL accounts. Just get your IT FICO team to send it over to help you hit those number ranges right.
Regards,
Satish Muvva.

KSV5 - Actual distribution post more than one document

Hi!
I've posted a cost center cycle actual distribution by using KSV5 transaction, cost center group and cost element group. The sys post two or more CO document insted of one and not in a progressive way. Why?
Is it a bug of the system?
Thanks
Giovanna

Hi Giovanna,
As I said, it's normal and should not pose any problem for you. Anyway, if you reverse, for example, the entire cycle results, the system will know to treat all the documents in question via the connection stroed in T811D table. The factors for creation of multiple documents could be various: number of items, controlling subkey value, auxiallary account assignment, etc.
For the 'jumping' of document numbers I wouldn't worry too much as well (though, this issue could be treated via SNR0 transaction), since it's internal CO documents and not FI. In some countries there are regulations which demand consequent document numbers, but this concerns only 'official' FI documents posted in general ledger.
Regards,
Eli

4KE5-Actual Distribution for Profit center

I am facing the below error when I execute the 4KE5 for profit center actual distribution. I have maintained the number range but still the same error is there. I defined number range for Document type OC for year 2008.
please advise how to overcome?
"Document number: range not found
Message no. GA703
Diagnosis
An error occurred during document number determination. No range was found for number range object GL_LOCAL, sub-object TTSL.
System Response
No document number was determined. Results could not be updated.
Procedure
Inform the person in charge of number ranges."

When you enter GB02, Click on the Overview icon (Shift +F7)
You should be able to see
Subobject Element           Year             From No.               To No.            NR Status
$$$$                                                         2008                    1           9999999999                   0
                 A0
where $$$$ is your company code, 2008 or 2009 is the year for which you want the number range, along with the document type (AO)
If you cannot see this, then you have not assigned the Number Range to that document type.
Regards,
Sangeeta
Edited by: Sangeeta on Apr 8, 2009 4:57 PM

Reg:Actual Distribution

Hi All,
FAGLGA35 - Executing the Transaction it is telling No Error and No Sender and Receiver Values...
Is it Requred for Profit Center Acivation in Controlling if i want to run above transaction...It seems like only..
Rgds
Srinu

HI,
FAGLGA35 is actual distribution in NewGL. It is used to distribute profit-center based values to other profit centers within New general ledger (prerequisite: profit-center master data,...).
So its not old profit-center accounting anymore (done in a special purpose ledger) but its integrated in NewGL tables now.
Best regards, Christian

FAGLGA35 - Actual Distribution in New General Ledger accounting

Dears,
In transaction FAGLGA35, system gives below mentioned messages :-
i) No valid sender entries were found. Message no. GA710.
Diagnosis
The system did not find a valid sender for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL. The problem can be due to the following reasons:
Master data checking for cycle 0LZAWL, segment AWL, found no valid senders for this segment.
The senders are valid from a master data standpoint, but the system found no posted values or quantities in the database corresponding to your selection criteria. The sender and the segment will be processed only if the cycle works iteratively and at least one sender in another segment receives values which it can then allocate iteratively.
In cycles for indirect activity allocation, this message appears if segment AWL is to allocate posted sender activity quantities but the sender has been completely scheduled. Complete scheduling of posted activity quantities occurs, for example, if you use cycle AWL in a test run but already used it in a current real processing run in the system.
System Response
The system cannot process the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of segment AWL in cycle 0LZAWL. In particular, check the validity of the sender master data for the settlement period.
To do so in cycle maintenance, choose "Formal check".
If segment AWL allocates posted values or quantities, the senders in the segment are valid only if:
The sender holds actually posted values/quantities not equal to 0
The cycle is iterative, and the sender receives values in another segment which it can then allocate iteratively.
If necessary, you must set the iteration indicator in cycle 0LZAWL.
In a cycle for indirect activity allocation, check whether the cycle is currently in use for posting in the system sender in segment AWL and thus completely schedules the senders in segment AWL.
If this is the case, cancel the cycle and repeat the cycle execution.
As per message solution, i do all the things but the same message comes.
ii) Cycle 0LZAWL, start date 20080401, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LZAWL, starting date 20080401.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Is anybody have any solution. Please suggest it.
Regards,
Kalpik Shah

s_alr_87012168 : Customer Aging Report (Due Date Analysis for Open Items) this is a report generated.

FI document on actual distribution between segments

Dear Experts
I want to do actual distribution from segment to segment.
I thought I could do it on FAGLGA35.
However, nevertheless I did activation the real-time integration,
FI document was not generated.
FI document is not generated on actual distribution between segments?
Kaneko

Hi
If you are talking about real time integration between FI and CO, please check when you define the variant, cross segment field is checked. Also,please check document type and Ledger group is defined.This variant must be assigned to company code in customizing.
Rgds
Harsh

Message GA603 when I'm create a Actual Distribution Cycle

Hi,
I'm trying to create a actual distribution cycle (transaction KSV1) and when I choose "Receiver Tracing Factor" to plan percent, I receive the error message GA603.
I need to do distribution from cost center to internal order group. Firstly, I created a order group.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
Osmar Tardivo.

I think it has something to do with the Internal Order group selection in the Receiver values.
Have you created the Group using GS01>Creating Set>with table CCSS and field AUFNR and then assign the values of internal order which you would want to group it.
Then assign the internal order group created in receiver and try to click on the Receiving Tracing Factor...
I hope this helps.

Actual Distribution FAGLGA31 (ECC6.0)

Hi All,
During creation of distribution cycle using tcode: FAGLGA31 - Create, I faced problem of having valid sender, ie: cost center in the segment creation.
In my sender/receiver tab, I can have
Senders as follows:
Account number
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Currency
Receiver:
Business Area
Functional Area
Profit Center
Question:
Why I cannot have cost center as sender and receiver?
Does anyone know any ECC6.0 (NEW GL) settings that were missed out?
Thanks.
sbmel

Hi ...
I tried to run the Actual distribution cycle FAGLGA35, and I have the follow error:
general messages for cycle 0LFBCA001 01.01.2010 ***********
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
General messages for segment FBCA001 ***********************
No valid sender entries were found.
Does anyone have any idea on this?
Extended error message:
==========
Cycle 0LFBCA001, start date 20100101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0LFBCA001, starting date 20100101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
==========

Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB

I am Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB for the month of march in the month of May, In which month will that be reflected (March or May)... Is there any way to reflect that in the month of march (the month for which KEUB is run?

Hi,
as far as I know, if you are executing KEUB for march in may its posted in march's period. Try a test run (maybe for only one segment).
Best regards, Christian

CO Distribution KSV5

Hi,
I have created a cycle in KSV5 the restriction sender values are too high.
I want the system to take all cots/revenues CElm in a group (B) within a CCtr group (A), with a variable portion of CElm group (E), (these CElm are all included in group B).
Distribute the fixed amount of X, Y and Z SEK of CCtr 1, 2, and 3 which are included in group A to receiver, to CCtr group (F).
I have entered the following:
1) Iterative cycle
2) Segment 1;
a) Sender rule: Fixed amount, 100%, act values.
b) Receiver tracing factor: Variable portion, actual cost, no scaling.
c) The base for senders: are Cost Center (CCtr in group (A)), Cost Element (CElm in group (B))
d) The base for receiver is (Group CCtr (F))
e) Sender values: is X ,Y and Z SEK from sender CCtr 1, 2 and 3 included in CCtr group A( the rest of the CCTR 0 SEK).
f) Receiver tracing faction, actual from CElm group (E), CElm included in CElm group (B).
g) Receiver weight factor is set to 100 for the receiving CCtrs.
As I result I want the system to distribute amount X, Y and Z , portioned by CCElm group (E), but it takes amount X, Y and Z and credit all CElm in group (B) even if there are no postings on them in CCtrs 1, 2 and 3. (The weighting and the sender and receiver CCtr are OK.
Thankfully for any help.
BR

ELIBJU,
I can not see any difference between your expectation and system works. The system just followed your expectation to distribute the fixed amount X, Y, Z by crediting all CElm in group B. What is your question?
If what you concern is the sender value too high only. Use assessment instead to avoid 'duplicate' distribution by each CElm in group B which is SAP style.

Distribution KSV5 dump: K5 011 ERROR IN COIOB MISSING BUKRS FOR OBJECT

Hi All,
Have you met following short dump whenever? It apears during distribution cycle run in update mode? Unfortunately I am not able to find any OSS Notes that could fix it:
Short text of error message:
Błąd ERROR IN COIOB MISSING BUKRS FOR OBJECT KSPL01IV1330
Technical information about the message:
Message classe...... "K5"
Number.............. 011
Variable 1.......... "ERROR IN COIOB"
Variable 2.......... "MISSING BUKRS"
Variable 3.......... "FOR OBJECT"
Variable 4.......... "KSPL01IV1330"
Thanks,
Rafał S.

You should maintain the field control for distributions
for the company code.
Please use transaction:
KCIV
Table             CCSS       Structure for General CO Fields
Field             BUKRS      Company Code
Allocation type   Distribution
Actual/plan       Actual and Plan
Here you should set the field:
NSFLAG ->         D always: unique or table field
br, Guido

Actual Distribution and Assesment Cycle

Dear All,
Please let me know how to create distribution and assesment cycle with transport request, please let me know any Snotes need to apply for create in non editable scenariou.

Dear All,
Please let me know how to create distribution and assesment cycle without transport request, please let me know any Snotes need to apply for create in non editable scenariou.
please note i want to create cycle in the non editable scenario without transport request.
Regards,
Rama Mohan

Execute Actual distribution - KSV5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for