Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB

I am Executing Actual Assessment Cycle (COPA) TCode KEUB for the month of march in the month of May, In which month will that be reflected (March or May)... Is there any way to reflect that in the month of march (the month for which KEUB is run?

Hi,
as far as I know, if you are executing KEUB for march in may its posted in march's period. Try a test run (maybe for only one segment).
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

  • Actual assessment cycles does not work

    Hello.
    I have a problem with actual assessment cycles.
    I use KSU5 to run one cycle and when I run it in test mode it says that there is a sender and a receiver and that there are no errors, but when I run it without test mode it says that there are no senders nor receivers and no errors appear
    Which could be the problem?
    Thanks a lot!!

    Hi,
    Try these following things :-
    a. Change the Receiving tracing factor in the header of the cycle from variable to fixed perct.
    b. Check whether GL is assigned in Tcode OK17.
    Rgds,
    SAP Friend

  • Function create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA

    Dear experts!
    Now, I'm getting some issue about create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA. Really, I want to know the function that create actual assessment cycle EC-PCA (t.code 3KE1).
    Help me, Please.
    Best regards, Huy.

    Hi,
    You are mixing things. 9KE0 is used to post PCA documents - nothing to do with assessment cycles. You could use BAPI_PCA_BELEG_SAVEREPLICA function for this. There is no function/BAPI to create assessment cycle (3KE1).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Problem in Actual assessment cycle.

    Hi Team,
    We are using assessment cycle to distribute the cost from utility cost center to production cost center, after cycle execution we found the cost in debit side of the production cost center with assessment cost element. And also we are using the substitution is that the cost which is coming on the assessment cost element will flow to FICO reconciliation GL. We created 5 sets of assessment cost element groups( depreciation secondary cost element group, Admin OH, Store spares, Salary wages & power & Fuel) which  correspond to five 9 series reconciliation accounts.
    The 5 reconciliation GLu2019s are as follows:
    1. Depreciation                90102003
    2. Administrative overheads     90102004
    3. Store spares.                90102005
    4. Salary & wages                   90102006
    5. Power water & fuel.            90102007.
    After assessment cycles when FI team runs the transaction F.01 for the above GLu2019s the cost is appearing. Which is the consolidated cost which is distributed from utility cost centers is there any way to get the primary cost element wise breakup of the above five heads. This is the requirement raised by the FI team kindly advice.
    Regards,
    Ravi.

    Hi Ravi,
    have you come up with any solution?
    I have found, we can use substitution rules in New GL- CO reconciliation to fix assessment issue. In fact, we have to maintain multiple substitution rules or table to get correct P&L by primary cost element. This is pretty much possible.
    My issue is, we are using COPA. COPA dont have distribution option.
    Let me know if anyone has better option than substitution. because I don't want to loose my primary cost element information.

  • Actual Assessment Cycle - Multiple Segments for one Cost Center

    Dear experts,
    I've got one very important (for me) question:
    I want to distribute a cost centers (primary) cost in two ways - at the same time:
       First: as a fixed value to three other cost centers and
       Second: the remaining cost shall be distributed to all cost centers of a cost center group
                    with an statistical key figure.
    Is it possible to distibute the remaining cost after a first distribution??
    If yes, how is the procedure to do so?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Ralf

    Hi Ralf,
    It's certainly possible; just create two steps, one after another, and you will achieve your goal.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Any BAPI or FM for Assessment cycle create 3KE1 tcode

    Hi,
    Any BAPI or Function module to create actual assessment cycle 3KE1 tcode.
    i am doing BDC for that currently. Anybody done this please send the coding for this.
    thanks
    Muthappan

    Hi Muthappan,
    Could you please send me some sample code you used to create Assessment Cycle / Distribution Cycle using the function module.
    Many Thanks in advance
    Soumen

  • COPA Assessment Cycles

    Hi Guru,
    I really need some help with setting up COPA assessment cycles in 6.0.  I have used the best practice guides but unfortunately they were to lazy to be thorough.  I am using transaction code KEU7 to create the cycle.  I have attached a few segments to the cycle and added the sender/receiver (cost centers, companycode) details aswell. I checked it before saving the cycle and i got no error messages.  Now when i execute the cycle through tcode KEUB i get errorr/warning messages saying that "no valid sender entries found" and "this segment does not contain any senders".  I am not sure what i am missing and what i may be doing incorrectly.  Can someone please help me understand how to rectify this issue.  I am extremely generous with rewarding points!!!
    Thanks in advance,
    Shaun

    Hi Smith,
    Basically we created copa cycles in KEU1 and execute through KEU5.Find that recivers are product hi-erarachies, In our orgainisation  Corporate oh are be charge to products through copa cycles.
    Coming to your problem,When ever you define new copa cyle you find the error in differet ways.
    1) NO VALID SENDER FOUND  for segment means, Go to the segment there is an button ie consistancy chek box.Click on the check box System returns relavant segment.Observe that segment contains valid senders and revicers are produtc hierarachies or not.
    2) Other wise go to the segment and clik on find button, give the cost center, cost elements.Observe secondary cost elements and rules.
    3) other wise you can directly execute the co-pa cycle and click on segments.Here you can easily find that sender contains valid recivers or not.Basically these kind of error message will appears still now there is no Transaction passed to that products..
    I hope you understood.
    Regards
    Maruthi

  • How to analyse the Receiver Tracing Factor in COPA Assessment cycle -KEU5

    Hi
    While executing the COPA Assessment cycle,we will get receiver tracing factor.My client wants to know how we got that.How can i analyse that Receiver tracing factor?Kindly advice me...
    How can I recalculate the tracing factor for assesstment?
    For example, Actual Assessment Cycle RS_A01 under Segment ITCMFG2AD uses Variable Portions Rule for Receiver tracing Factor with Value Field of 62 Sales.
    The intent of this assessment was to be allocated based upon sales dollar values however when I review the test calculation, it appears the tracing factor is in billions of dollars when our monthly sales are in the million of dollars range.
    Supriya

    Hi,
    If Receier Tracing Factor Rule is Variable Portion, then please also check the Receiver Weighting factor (the last tab in the assessment cycle, it normally is 100 for the receivers.
    Secondly also check if there is different currency setting in CO Area & the Operating Concern which translates into different figures.
    Hope this works.
    Regards
    Saket

  • COPA Assessment Cycle - Segment Wise

    Hello Friends,
    Good Day!
    I have created COPA Actual Assessment Cycle by T-Code KEU1. I have created around 5 Segments in that cycle. I want to execute the Assessment Cycle, but Segment Wise. I am trying to execute KEU5 and execute the Cycle. The assessment was properly as desired but for all Segment at once.
    But if I want to execute this Cycle Segment Wise, is there any possible way to do that?
    Many Thanks,
    Pritesh Lodha

    Dear Lodha,
    Please try in the following manner which may suits your requirement:
    Lock indicator available in Assessment cycles segment wise.
    If you have many segments and want to run for few segments, you can use the lock indicator in assessment cycle T Code: KSU2
    After locking the required segments you can run the assessment cycle using KEU5 by specifying the cycle name.
    Cycle will consider the active segments only.
    Regards,
    Pavan Kumar Arvapally

  • Reciever tracing factor in COPA assessment cycle

    Hi All,
    I have account-based COPA and am trying to create COPA cost center assessment cycle in Tcode KEU2. While filling the reciever tracing factors, i can see the following values
    RCMEGI     Total Quantity
    RCWKFI     Fixed Costs
    RCWKGI     Total Costs
    However i need to define another key figure based on headcount
    Can anyone help me with how to create additional Amount/Qty Field for the assessment cycle. Where would be above be defined?
    Thanks & Regards
    Pooja Saxena

    Hi Christian
    Are you suggesting that the costs from cost center be allocated upon, say, some IOs based on SKF and then settling the IOs to COPA?
    This would be very cumbersome to create as many IOs as the possible combinations of Customer/ product / Other receiver chars
    Or are you suggesting some thing else which I could not catch?
    Also, new qty field can be created in KEA6... Values updated for this thru KE21N will work for acct based COPA?
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • COPA Assessment cycle + OKP1

    Hi,
    As part of month end activities, OB52 and OKP1 were closed for last month.
    But still COPA assessment cycle is not completed.
    Pls. let me know if they need to be opened again for executing the assessment cycles.
    Thanks,
    Sridevi

    Hi Sridevi,
    Goto OKP1 T.code and open transaction "Assessment to CO-PA" for particulare period and execute Assessment cycles for COPA and  Goto OKP1 T.code and close transaction "Assessment to CO-PA" for previously open period.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Error while running  Assessment of Costs(TCode: KSU5)

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a very critical situation which needs your immediate attention.
    While running an Assessment Cycle using TCode KSU5 i am facing an error which says :
    "No account is specified in item 0000000001
    Message no. F5670
    Diagnosis
    No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
    System Response
    The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
    Procedure
    A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document."
    I am unable to understand why this is happening as the FI document is getting posted properly and data has also flown into the Cost Center from where the assessment will be made.
    Also while doing test run the results are "Processing done without errors" but while making actual posting the above error appears.
    I have to cover this transaction in UAT and hence needs your immediate attention.
    Thanks & Regards
    Piyush Kothari

    Hi,
    First create a G/L a./c for posting CO entries in FI
    SPRO>FA (NEW)>**** (NEW)LEDGERS>REAL TIME INTEGRATION WITH FI>ACCOUNT DETERMINATION  FORREAL TIME INTEGRATION>DEFINE ACCOUNT DETERMINATION FOR REAL TIME INTEGRATION
    SELECT
    CHANGE ACCOUNT DETERMINATION
    SELECT RULES
    SELECT POSTING KEY
    ENTER G/L A/C YOU CREATED EARLIER FOR COFI ENTRIES
    Bye,
    Ramesh

  • Runtime Analysis in PA Assessment Cycle

    Dear All,
    I have run an PA Assessment Cycle in with "Flow Trace On" and "Run Time Analysis On".I have a 3 part question
    A) I seek your help in understanding the following and correct my understanding(stated in small brackets) if i am wrong
         1) Before Selection (Start Time of the Cycle)
         2) After Selection (Database Selection)
         3) After Iteration (???)
         4) After Oldkey (???)
         5) After Post (???)
         6) No Of Sender Values in Database (No of Senders in my Cycle and for which Master data exists in Database)         
         7) No Of Receiver Values in Database ( No of Unique Combination of Receivers in the Database CE4XXXX table)
         8) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 6, No of Senders that are actually sending Values)
         9) No Of Allocating Senders (Out of the Senders stated in Point 7, No of Receivers that are actually receiving Values)
        10) No Of Line Items(???)
    B) When i run the same Cycle in Test Run and Update run there is a huge difference in time and the Values for the items 6~10 points also differ( i am the only one working on the test system and there is no other data posted posted apart from this) so what is the reason for difference.
    C) If i am running on a HANA COPA Accelerator, will the change in the receivers (stated below) have an impact on the read time (logically yes, but need some expert opinion also)
         1) No of Characteristics (Ex: Unitil now Profit Center alone, from now on PCTR, Product, Div, Dis Chl)
         2) No of Characteristics Values (Ex: Unitill Now PRTCR Values are A,B and C From now on it will be A~Z)
    Request your valuable inputs. And my apologies for a very long question.
    Thanks & Regards
    Surya

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for your comment. But that is not compliant to my question. I didn't do any configuration in KEPA and assign any characteristics groups for assessment cycle. However I really don't know why only one characteristics(Product:ARTNR) is suppressed and so I cannot input any value into that characteristics for actual assessment cycle.
    I will appreciate your kindly help.
    Best regards,
    Ivan

  • Number range error in Assessment cycle in CO-PA

    Dear All,
    During performing "Actual Assessment cycle in CO-PA" , system gives the error message
    "An error occurred when the SAP System attempted to determine the document number. No interval was found for number range object RK_BELEG, sub-object 1000".
    When I checked in KEN1 (Document ranges for actual posting) & also checked in
    KANK, it is defined
    Can some one can explain me how to re-solve the same.
    Rgds
    SMK Ganesh

    Hi,
      Please, check transaction KANK, under menu path of SPRO:
    Controlling -> General Controlling -> Organization ->
    Maintain number ranges for controlling documents
    Choose Overview and find the corresponding CO area.
    You will see that there are several business transactions not assigned
    to any number range. One of them should be KSPA Assessment to CO-PA.
    Please, assign this business transaction (and the ones required for other processes) to a number range.
    Then, run again KEU5.
    If the above does not help then check if problem is that you use too many receiver fields in copa cycle.
    The number range object is derived from the co-area and if you are using more than 15 single value receiver fields the system wont consider the settings "behind" the co-area.
    regards
    Waman

  • Assessment Cycle - Posting affected in GL Account

    Hi,
    The users have created the assessment cycle, specifying the Sender and Receiver Cost Centers and the fixed percentages. After executing the assessment cycle, it is noted that one of the GL Accounts is getting impacted with the running of the assessment cycle and the postings are taking place in this GL Account, whereas by running the assessment cycle, there should not be any postings in the GL Account.
    Could you please advise as to how what could be the reason and how can we check the same?
    Thanks in advance for the assistance.
    Regards

    Hi Ashok,
    Thanks for the feedback. As suggested by you, I have checked the Cost Element for the GL Account that is impacting the Finance and find that the Cost Element Category is 1, i.e. Primary Costs. I presume that you want me to check the Cost Element category of only that GL Account which is getting impacted.
    Would really appreciate your help in assisting me to investigate the cause.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for