Exice wrong values in migo
Hi,
I'm geting wrong excise values during migo- excise capturing,
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 160
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60... this is the normal flow, where mine is flowed like
blw;
Base price - 1000
BED - 16% - 174
Ed cess 2% - 3.20
Se cess 1% - 1.60
pls tell me how to correct it..
condition record is the one possibility for this.
check the excise defaults in CIN setting i think there u have maitained the rs.14 as values colounm instead of 14% BED condition
Again check same in J1ID
the excise rates for chapter iD
regards,.
sujit
Similar Messages
-
Webi base on BW query based on Infoset comes back with wrong values
Hello:
I have a Webi report on an OLAP Universe, on Bex Query.
The bex query is based on 1 INFOSET.
When I run the webi report the values that comes back a totally wrong values.
The correct results are not brought back.
When I do a test with crystal reports to the infoset, I can see the correct values. (I'm aware crystal uses different drivers).
The test is BW query designer, and crystal brings back proper values from Infoset based BW query.
Webi on Infoset based BW Query comes back with wrong data.
query is simple.
Pull in 3 attributes, 3 key figures, where componentkey = "111"
I get 36 rows in Crystal and 36 rows in Bex Analyzer, 36 rows in BW query designer (web analyzer).
I get many rows in webi (almost like a CARTENSIAN product).
I search a round this forum but still did not see a conclusive answer to this problem.
But I see another thread that several others faced this same issue without a resolution.
My environment.
BOE XI 3.1 SP2
No fix packs
SAP IK 3.1 SP2
HPUX-IA64
Thanks in advance for any help.
DwayneWas this problem ever solved?
I am having a similar problem with an infoset based query.
I have created the BW infoset, and confirmed that the correct data is returned from the underlying infoproviders. A simple BW query on that infoset yields the same results.
Create the universe, and then the WEBI, and WEBI now shows hundreds of records where I expect 10. Data is being returned in WEBI that definitely shouldn't be there. It's almost like the restrictions applied in the characteristic restriction area of my BW query are being ignored, even if I include them in the WEBI query.
Cheers,
Andrew -
Full Points sure: Wrong values populating in report (BEX)
Hi Gurus,
I got an Issue on CRM Report. Report is populating wrong values.
In the report, We have structure called Opportunity (in that structure fields are New opportunity, Close opportunity, Win opportunity and Open opportunity) in query and One key figure called Revenue.
On revenue we have one condition with variables. But, in that condition everything is fine.
The Condition Screen is like this:
Radio Button: Single characteristic is selected
"Opportunity Sales ID" selected in Characteristics.
Keyfigures:
Revenue New Opp TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue Open Opp TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue WINS TOP N TOP X OPP
Revenue Lost TOP N TOP X OPP
everything is right in this: If we select top 10 opportunities. we are getting wrong values
for ex: if we select top 10 Opportunities (in the selection screen) means REVENUES.
We are getting 12 values. 10 values are correct remaining 2 values are wrong..
There is no Update routine for revenue keyfield.
Can please suggest me on this What are possibilities for wrong values ...
FULL POINTS SURE FOR THIS
THANKS,
KNHi All,
Can anybody answer... this...
thanks,
KR -
Excise Values in MIGO For MPN Materials
Hello,
While capturing the excise invoice for the MPN materials system is not picking the excise values. We are using the TAXINN procedure and i have maintianed the condition records for the Key combination country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode (WE have created a condtion table for this key combination) and we also maintained the MPN materials in the J1ID also but it is not picking the values in the item tab. Taxes are caluclated in the Purchase order.
Note:
For the MPN Materials we have only three views maintained in the material master and it is not extended to any of the plant.
I have noticed that if use the other tax code which i maintained the condition records for Conidtion table 651 (key Combination of Country/Tax Code) the excise values are flowing in MIGO but if i use the tax code EA (Condition table 652 Key Combination: country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode) we are not getting the excise values in MIGO
Please let me know if there is any configuration is missing.
Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 2:10 PM
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 5:19 PM>
cnranjith wrote:
> Dear all
>
> When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
>
> I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
>
> already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
>
> We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
>
> What might be the reason
First you have to post the Customs MIRO in case of import purchase...then go for MIGO...you will find excise tab will follow....
Regards,
Indranil -
Updated CODE1 is showing wrong values in 2LIS_05_QE1
Hi all,
I'm using 2LIS_05_QE1 extractor to report over qualitative data in BW. When the code of the characteristics is updated, the extractor takes 2 records, before and after images. The extractor is gathering wrong values for the CODE1 field in the before image.
REQUEST DATAPAKID RECORD ROCANCEL PPLNKN MERKNR CODE1 GRUPPE1 ZHLNSTAT
REQU_4KVR0APSV0RSZ7N70IOR0F95L 1 5120 5 40 0 CIBAU038 1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9 3 4045 X 5 40 0 CIBAU038 -1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9 3 4046 5 40 75 CIBAU038 1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9 3 4045 X 5 40 0 CIBAU038 -1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9 3 4046 5 40 75 CIBAU038 1
We have changed the characteristic two times, now we can see two of the before images with the ROCANCEL field marked with = 'X'. The problem appears in the second before image which is not taking the actual value of the CODE1 field (75), instead is showing the value in zero. Then, when I report over the key figure in the table above ZHLNSTAT (quantity of values) the results are showing 2 values for CODE1=75 and -1 values for CODE1=0.
Any ideas?I have checked Datasource and CODE1 is not a hidden field...apart from this field there are other fields too which I can see in Datasource in R/3 about dont see them in BW ....
Please let me know what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Murtuza.
Edited by: Murtuza Morwala on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 AM -
HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01 has wrong value!
HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01 has wrong value!
Hello again,
I have a search page in my app (here the user defines the search criteria) P1.
The page branches to P130, where the result is shown. This second page contains a region of type 'SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body Returning SQL Query)'. The code for this dynamic query is 231 lines of code, so I want to spare you scrolling through it here . What it basically does is generating SQL QRY's such as the following:
select distinct(sq.SAMPLE_ID) XXX,
'ID: '||sq.SAMPLE_ID||'
' ||'Type: '||sq.SAMPLE_TYPE||'
' ||'Collection Date: '||sq.COLLECTION_DATE SAMPLE_INFO,
'Aliquots (T/A): '||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_TOTAL)|| '/' ||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE)||'
' ||'Volume (T/A): '||to_char(sq.VOLUME_TOTAL,'990D00')|| '/' ||to_char(sq.VOLUME_AVAILABLE,'990D00') AVAILABILITY,
'Age: '||sq.PATIENT_AGE||'
' ||'Gender: '||sq.PATIENT_SEX||'
' ||'Bloodtype: '||sq.BLOOD_TYPE||'
' PATIENT_INFO,
DML_SERVICE.get_Diagnoses(sq.SAMPLE_ID) DIAGNOSES,
DML_SERVICE.get_Medications(sq.SAMPLE_ID) MEDICATIONS,
DML_SERVICE.get_Interferences(sq.SAMPLE_ID) INTERFERENCES,
DML_SERVICE.get_LabData(sq.SAMPLE_ID) LABDATA,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.text(1, '1', 1, 2)) ORDER_QTY,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.checkbox(2,sq.SAMPLE_ID)) ORDER_ME
from SEARCH_V01 sq
where sq.DIAGNOSIS = 'D-Dimer'
order by 1 desc
The DML_SERVICE functions just return a string(Varchar2). At the right side of the report I have two columns, one with a textfield (ORDER_QTY, default: 1) and one with a checkbox (ORDER_ME) for each line.
For each line where the checkbox is checked, a process (On Submit - after Comp and Val) places the order for the requested quantity (this is done by inserting an Order ID into the ALIQUOTS table -> see bold update statement below).
The process follows:
declare
alq_qty number;
alq_id number;
cnt number;
begin
cnt := 0;
for i in 1..HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02.count
loop
select count(*) -- set alq_qty to number of available alq's
into alq_qty
from ALIQUOTS a
where a.SAMPLE_ID = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and a.ORDER_ID = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'wanted: ' || HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) || ' available: ' || alq_qty); -- REMOVE!!!
if alq_qty > to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)) then -- if there are enough alq's
alq_qty := to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)); -- set alq_qty to number of ordered alq's
end if;
for n in 1..alq_qty
loop
select min(ID)
into alq_id
from ALIQUOTS
where sample_id = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and order_id = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'alq_id: '||alq_id); -- REMOVE!!!
update ALIQUOTS
set order_id = :P130_SELECT_ORDER
where id = alq_id;
cnt := cnt + 1;
end loop;
dml_service.upd_sample_record(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)); -- refresh data in SAMPLE table
end loop;
:P130_MSG := 'Assigned '||cnt||' aliquots to order: '||:P130_SELECT_ORDER;
end;
Now my problem is that this process does what it should, sometimes. When I enter 6 in one row and check the checkbox and enter 4 in another row and check that checkbox and then press SUBMIT, 10 aliquots are assigned to my order.
Sometimes.... the other times the process just orders 2 aliquots, one of each line and disregards the number entered in the textfield.
Or so it may seem: I added some lines to write debug info into D_DEBUG (see above.) From those entries you can assume that the content of HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) is in fact '1' when the process does its work. So I think the problem lies somewhere in the creation of htmldb_item.text(), (I went through the API of that htmldb_item again and again...)
Also: I can reproduce / recreate this error. It's totally weird: for some rows it (always) works and for some it (always) doesn't !!!
So, any help, any suggestion is really appreciated (I'm currently working on bringing the crucial part of this to marvel.oracle.com)
-David-
[Edited by: sleuniss on Jul 15, 2004 12:18 PM]
Changed subject line.Now the subjectline is right, but the indentation is gone.... :-(
again the SQL query:
select distinct(sq.SAMPLE_ID) XXX,
'ID: '||sq.SAMPLE_ID||'
' ||'Type: '||sq.SAMPLE_TYPE||'
' ||'Collection Date: '||sq.COLLECTION_DATE SAMPLE_INFO,
'Aliquots (T/A): '||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_TOTAL)|| '/' ||to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE)||'
' ||'Volume (T/A): '||to_char(sq.VOLUME_TOTAL,'990D00')|| '/' ||to_char(sq.VOLUME_AVAILABLE,'990D00') AVAILABILITY,
'Age: '||sq.PATIENT_AGE||'
' ||'Gender: '||sq.PATIENT_SEX||'
' ||'Bloodtype: '||sq.BLOOD_TYPE||'
' PATIENT_INFO,
DML_SERVICE.get_Diagnoses(sq.SAMPLE_ID) DIAGNOSES,
DML_SERVICE.get_Medications(sq.SAMPLE_ID) MEDICATIONS,
DML_SERVICE.get_Interferences(sq.SAMPLE_ID) INTERFERENCES,
DML_SERVICE.get_LabData(sq.SAMPLE_ID) LABDATA,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.text(1, '1', 1, 2)) ORDER_QTY,
decode(to_char(sq.ALIQUOTS_AVAILABLE), '0', null, htmldb_item.checkbox(2,sq.SAMPLE_ID)) ORDER_ME
from SEARCH_V01 sq
where sq.DIAGNOSIS = 'D-Dimer'
order by 1 desc
and the process:
declare
alq_qty number;
alq_id number;
cnt number;
begin
cnt := 0;
for i in 1..HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02.count
loop
select count(*) -- set alq_qty to number of available alq's
into alq_qty
from ALIQUOTS a
where a.SAMPLE_ID = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and a.ORDER_ID = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'wanted: ' || HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i) || ' available: ' || alq_qty); -- REMOVE!!!
if alq_qty > to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)) then -- if there are enough alq's
alq_qty := to_number(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F01(i)); -- set alq_qty to number of ordered alq's
end if;
for n in 1..alq_qty
loop
select min(ID)
into alq_id
from ALIQUOTS
where sample_id = HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)
and order_id = 0;
insert into D_DEBUG (ID, DD) values (1, 'alq_id: '||alq_id); -- REMOVE!!!
update ALIQUOTS
set order_id = :P130_SELECT_ORDER
where id = alq_id;
cnt := cnt + 1;
end loop;
dml_service.upd_sample_record(HTMLDB_APPLICATION.G_F02(i)); -- refresh data in SAMPLE table
end loop;
:P130_MSG := 'Assigned '||cnt||' aliquots to order: '||:P130_SELECT_ORDER;
end;
-David- -
TDS certificate wrong values down payment clearing
Hi,
we are using 4.7 version with patch level Sap &APPl( accounts &
Logistics) SAPKH47029. we are using extended witholding tax. with three
tax codes. Tds + Surcharge, Ecess , SHEcess
we made vendor downpayment Rs5000/-. at the time my TDS is
TDS+Surcharge= 550, Ecess=11, SHEcess= 6, Total tax= Rs567/-
we made vendor invoice Rs10000/- at the time TDS is
TDS+Surcharge= 1100, Ecess=22, SHEcess= 11, Total tax= Rs1133/-
We cleared downpayment using F-54 aginst invoice.
at the time it has reversed the Downpayment tds entry Rs567/-
i made remittance challan J1INCHLN amount RS 1133/- it is correct.
While generating TDS certificate it is showing wrong values. Rs 1116/-
it is showing two line items.
Amount paid TDS Surcharge Educat cess Total tax
9450.00 500 50 1 549.00
5000.00 500 50 17 567.00
Total 1116.00
But it is showing correct value in Querterly e returns J1INQEFILEHi,
Note Number: 1124300 -
Viewing wrong values in messageStyledtext box created by personalisation
Hi
I created a messageStyledText thru personalisation and the value is setting to this by calling a procedure.Please find the code below.
String sql="BEGIN XXCHR_ACCRUAL_BALANCE_CALC(:1,:2); END;";
oapagecontext.writeDiagnostics(this, "*** Congragulations you entered the Action" + sql , 1);
//SSHRParams sshrParams = new SSHRParams(oadbt);
OracleCallableStatement stmt = (OracleCallableStatement)oadbt.createCallableStatement(sql,1);
stmt.setString(1,person_id);
stmt.registerOutParameter(2,OracleTypes.NUMBER);
stmt.execute();
oadbt.commit();
String us_pto_accrual_value = null;
us_pto_accrual_value = stmt.getString(2);
Issue now is : First time i login accrual balance will be displayed correctly in the text box.There is Save button in the page.For current pay period i entered a PTO value as 8 hours.Then i clicked on the save button.The accrual is not submitted so after page refreshes the same value which we have seen before shd come.But the value is coming something different.So what i have done is i tried to print this stmt.getString(2) value using diagonistics.First time it is retrieving correctly but after clicking on the save button it is assigned some wrong value.
I closed the current IE and opened a new IE then it is showing correct values.
Can anyone help on this issue.?
It is very urgent.
Thanks
PreetiHi Gaurav,
We are just calling the procedure in the backend and we are assigning the result to the out parameter and that out parameter is assigining to a variable using getString method.
Then we are picking the id for that and setting the value like this:
OAMessageStyledTextBean uspto = (OAMessageStyledTextBean)pgbean.findChildRecursive("USPTOSTYLEDTEXT");
uspto.setValue(oapagecontext,us_pto_accrual_value);
Thanks
Preeti -
Hi,
I am developing a program the will check for disk space (used,blocks, available ...) and i am using the statvfs.h file.
When tested with small capacity disks (~5G) it works fine (compared to df -k).
When tested with large capacity disks (~400G) it returns wrong values(compared to df -k).
I am using f_bavail and i am casting from fsblkcnt_t to integer/long.
Please help.
Thanx R.Thanks for your answer.
I have discovered that it (statvfs.h) doe's not work with vxfs, only with ufs.
I am using Veritas Cluster Server.
Any chance of an answer ??
thanks,
R. -
Color picker on Illustrator CC 2014 shows wrong values
See the image above . The selected area filled color is e6e6e6 ( 230, 230, 230 ) but the color picker shows the wrong value 4d4d4d. Its happens only on Illustrator , What is this actually is there any problem with the color mode settings ? Please help me
You misunderstand me, so don’t be too quick to judge.
I said that the Color panel was more efficient than the Color Picker. It has sliders so that you can adjust colours precisely as you wish first time, rather than just groping somewhere on a big area of colour in the Picker and then having to make fine numerical adjustments afterwards (plus an OK when you’re done).
The Color panel is particularly useful when you are working in CMYK because it ensures that you get clean mixtures when you want them (which the Picker does not, without fine tweaking afterwards).
And if you want to get shades of the same colour, you simply hold down Shift as you drag one of the sliders.
In conjunction with the Swatches panel, I would go for the Color panel any time, but if you prefer the Picker that’s quite all right by me. -
Wrong value in java stored function
Hi All,
i have written a java stored function,
at the end of the code it insert record into the database
among other columns also a number(18,3) column,
when I debug it (out side of server) - works fine.
when I load it to database i get wrong values in column
(like instead of 76.546 i get 77.667) I can't figure out where it comes from.
I use big decimal in java code.
if i Hard code the value in java code it works fine!
am I missing something ?, calculations/ data type different out side then inside database? using oracle 10.2.0.2
Cheers
SaharHi
the code calculate some averages of amounts ( money) according to several
conditions,and parameters given to the function and stores the average into table in the database
the money columns are of data type 18,3 , both source and target tables have same structure.
thanks
Sahar -
CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print
Dear Friends,
I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D Tarun KumarHi,
I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
This is used in transaction me23n also.
Kind regards,
Tülay -
Wrong value with calculated item in pivot table
I have a report with 4 columns:
First Column are Department Dimension
Second Column is Actual value
Third Column is Previous value
Four Column is: ((Actual Value-Previous Value)/Previous Value))*100 that called Var
Then I do a pivot table and I have new calculated item: Department1/Department2 and I have wrong value in four column:
Department----------------------------------Actual-------Previous------Var
Dept1------------------------------------------18503--------16308--------13,5
Dept2-------------------------------------------3758---------3518----------6,8
(Calculated Item: Dept1/Dept2)--------4,92---------4,64------------*2* <---- This value is wrong...and it has to be: 6,03
Is possible to get the correct value???
Thank you very much!hi,
Create a logical column with ur calculation formula and make it as default agg rule in rpd and answers change it to server determined/server complex agg.I did the same it was working fine for me!!
Check this link
http://books.google.com/books?id=OnbYrkWa4RsC&pg=PA74&lpg=PA74&dq=%22server+complex+aggregate%22&source=web&ots=qxrpaFXmo2&sig=CxLOemzcOlvIiaQ_sQD4fPQotdM&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#v=onepage&q=%22server%20complex%20aggregate%22&f=false
thanks,
saichand -
Unlimited Delivery Indicator in relation with Default values in MIGO screen
What is the relation of 'Unlimited Delivery Indicator' in PO with 'Porposed All Items Indicator' in Default Values of MIGO?
Case:
PO created with quantity 100. GR is done for 100 quantity. If 'Porposed All Items Indicator' is set system allows to receive more than PO quantity in GR.
Its behavior is same as Unlimited Delivery Indicator in PO.'Porposed All Items Indicator' Indicates that items with quantities of zero are also suggested upon goods receipts with reference to purchase orders.
use:No more goods receipts are expected for items that have a quantity of zero, but they are possible. Items with quantities of zero may occur after partial deliveries or reversals, for example.
You can set this indicator if you often have to enter additional quantities to purchase order items that are already completed.
'Unlimited Delivery Indicator' the delivery quantity is not limited
Regards,
Pramod -
Dear Gurus.
I have crearted Import asset Purchase order then we have made finanvial entry and creating good receipt and post Part 1 Entry.
Now I want to Post Part 2 entry using J1iex but when I Simulate I have got wrong value in RG23c AED.
value comes 100 % but i want 50 % and 50 % should goes in RG23C on Hold .
I am Waiting your reply.
Regards,
Riten patelDear Piyush Mishra
It is Not ADC , It is AED (additional excise Duty)
Still i am facing problem.
I am waiting your Reply.
Regards,
Riten patel
Maybe you are looking for
-
ITunes wont delete, needs re-install but keep getting error message.
I have a Dell XPS M1710 and running the latest version of iTunes. Well, I had a problem with the DVD drive in the laptop and one of the tech guys edited the registry remotely and re-installed the DVD drive. Now iTunes is showing this error message wh
-
Work order user and system ststus
Hi all, In plant maintenance work order(iw31) system and user status have to display as a report. I want to know table and field name for that below status. Please guide me. CRTD - created PAPL - PLAN - planned APP - approved REL - realeased TECO - T
-
ICR proces 003: data reconciliation runtime
Dear all, we are implementing SAP ICR process 003 for both customer/vendor open items and GL open items and have come across the following issue: If a user runs tcode FBICR3 for a period in which no data exist (yet) in table FBICRC003A, tcode FBICR3
-
Performance of XSLT transformation
Hello everybody, I´m trying to do some in-database XML transformations from one XML format to another with a rather complex xsl stylesheet of about 9000 lines of code which performs this transformation. At first I tested the XDK XSLT functionality by
-
How to Add Album Art to Multiple Songs Same Time?
I have many scenarios where 60-70 songs will share the same imported album art. Is there a method to add the art to the bulk of songs all at the same time. Similar to the multiple item entry field? Thanks!