Exif data in RAW Canon image  : timing question

In Photoshop CS 6 ex ( creative cloud ), when I open a Canon T3i DSLR RAW image it does not give the time the picture was taken to the second, only to the minute.  In my old Photoshop CS 3, Canon raw images are identified to the second.
For my work I need to know the time when the image was shot to the second. 
Am I missing a setting or something?
Thanks in advance for any help on this matter.
Thomas

I was able to solve this problem.
I am using Macs running Mac OS; snow leopard and mountain lion. 
Soultion:
In Mac OS :  Click on date and time in the top menu bar. Then go to "Open Language and Text...." in the box. Then go to "Region" or "Formats" depending on your operating system. Click on "Times" and customize the settings as to your own needs.
This then enables up to millisecond time for the Canon RAW exif data. 
Thomas

Similar Messages

  • Need help with EXIF date on raw images

    I have just over 100 images (taken by 2nd shooter) that have the wrong EXIF date (JPEG and raw).  They were taken with a 2nd camera that was off by +15hrs 57min.
    There are many programs that will easily edit the EXIF date/time on the JPEGs, but they don't work with the raw images.
    I've read that Lightroom can compensate for incorrect dates upon import, but after searching, I can't find any information on how to do it.  Can someone please help?

    I got EXIFTool working and solved my problem down to the exact second.
    I was able to sync the times to within one second, based on one one particular event.  One shot, taken with camera 1 was right before a handshake, while both people were extending hands, the other shot, with camera 2 (wrong EXIF date) was the actual handshake.  I used this information to determine that camera 2 was 15hours 57minutes 18seconds fast.
    Using EXIFTool GUI, I modified the date/time shift to decrement 15hours 57minutes 18seconds for all images from the second camera (both raw and JPEG).  After this was complete, I checked the times, and the two frames (before and during the handshake) were only one second apart, and in correct sequence.
    I imported the images from both cameras into Lightroom and had it rename the images based on time down to the second (YYYYMMDDHHMMSS-filename).
    Now everything is great!

  • Inconsistent import of EXIF data for RAW images

    As of the last month or so I have started to notice import issues related to EXIF data within Aperture. When I import images from a card into a new album, some of the images import EXIF data and others do not. This behavior is seemingly random and affects a subset of all images. Even images taken on the same card with the same camera seconds apart can have differing behavior. At first I presumed that it was a faulty CF card but I now see this behavior across multiple cards (CF, SDHC). Even more perplexing is that the EXIF data will be associated to some images when I import once, and after reimporting the same images once agin from the same source, some do not have the EXIF data. This inconsistent behavior leads me to believe there may be a bug in the import process.
    Has anyone had a problem like this? Any advice?

    Yes, it is weird.  My experience matches zeroorone's.  No EXIF inf. showed.  I wasn't using a metadata preset that showed _all_ EXIF, but a lot of it, and all the "important ones".  It seems reasonable to assume that none of the EXIF was showing.
    Brand new installation of everything, less than 1 week old, all up-to-date (I am re-installing everything, slowly; porting nothing except some pref and support files, and data files).  Only happened once so far (but on three consecutive imports).

  • Exif data of a C7 image

    How to know from exif data of an image on a computer that it is captured from a specific C7 phone?

    You can access EXIF data upon your C7-00 using Resco Photo Viewer, which is not however what you were asking for.
    Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

  • Does PSE11 show HDR exif data for a Canon 5D Mark III?

    I have taken some pictures with the HDR feature on my Canon 5D Mark III. The HDR image that the camera creates does not show that it was created using the camera's HDR feature when viewed with PSE11. The Canon Software that came with my camera is ImageBrowserEX 1.4.0 and it shows these data: HDR Shooting Enable, Adjust dynamic range +-2, HDR Effect Natural, Auto Image Align Enable. Is there a way to show the HDR exif in PSE11? Thanks, Anne

    Thanks -- I should have mentioned in my original question that I had already looked at File>Info. The usual stuff is there but nothing about the image being created from the HDR camera function, or at least that I could see. I went through all the tabs including Advanced and just don't see it. I will try to figure out how to ask Adobe Technical Support and how to request that they get that info included if it's not there. Anne

  • Batch convert Raw to jpg with EXIF data

    I would like to batch convert RAW images files to jpeg format while preserving the EXIF data.  Is there any way to do this with the built-in apps in OS X Mavericks?
    This used to be possible with Preview.app using the "Export Selected Images..." command.  However, as of Mavericks, that command does not correctly copy EXIF data for the individual images.  Instead, the EXIF data for the first image is used in all of the exported images. So Preview.app is now pretty much useless for converting batches of RAW files.
    Can anyone point me to a workaround in Preview.app, or an alternative way to do this conversion in Mavericks?
    I should add that I don't want to import all my images into iPhoto.  I prefer to use regular folders to organize my images rather than the walled library that iPhoto creates.

    Andrew Shalit wrote:
    I used iPhoto for many years and found it to be cumbersome and more trouble than it was worth.  It did not let me manage, organize, rate, tag, and edit my photos in any way approaching convenience. 
    Hate to say this for the 3rd time, but use Canon's "DPP" (Digital Photo Professional).
    With it you can "manage, organize, rate, tag, and edit [your] photos" as well as batch convert to jpeg or othet formats.

  • TIFF export date issue with 40D images

    Hi.
    I have a strange issue with Aperture 1.5.6, Leopard 10.5 and Canon 40D RAW images.
    The problem is this:
    1) Import a 40D RAW image in aperture.
    2) The exif image date is 13.11.07 20:21:10.
    3) Then edit the image in Adobe Photoshop CS3 (TIFF).
    4) Now we have two version of the image: the original RAW file and a TIFF file.
    5) Export the two images with aperture to JPEG files.
    Now the exif date/time of the image exported (RAW) is 13.11.07 20:21:10 and that's correct.
    The problem is that the time of the second image (TIFF) has exactly two more hour ( 13.11.07 22:21:10 ).
    In aperture the date/time is correct for both the images.
    Someone can please try to replicate this issue?

    Thanks for your reply.
    1. I select the photos from iPhoto - varied between 5 and 20 (ran different test)
    2. Click on FILE
    3. Select EXPORT
    4. Under the FILE EXPORT tab I have tried all the various options with no success
    5. KIND - I make sure they are JPEG files - I have tried the Original also which is actually JPEG files
    6. JPEG QUALITY - I have tried all 4 options from LOW to MAX
    7. SIZE - I tried all 4 size options from SMALL to FULL
    8. FILE NAME - I use filename
    9. Select EXPORT tab
    10. I export to the thumbdrive and I chcek and they are on the thumbdrive
    11. I also tried to EXPORT to the desktop and copy them to the thumbdrive
    I click on the photos on the exported images I placed on the thumb drive and they come up fine on PREVIEW on my MAC. No prroblem with the images until I try to use them on the plasma. I go back and use images from iPhoto 06 that I did not call up with the "08" program and they work fine.
    Hope that explains what I do. Thanks again

  • Can I create "keyword list" from keywords in EXIF data?

    Hi - I'm still a Mac and Aperture noob, so please excuse me if the question is dumb or ill-formed...
    I used to use Photoshop Elements on a PC. I made pretty extensive use of "tags" (keywords, in Aperture lingo) for categorizing my photos. I wrote all the tags into the exif data of my photos, then copied everything over to Aperture.
    Now, when I pull up an existing photo in Aperture browser, I can see the keywords that I already added. Great...but, is there a way to extract all the existing keywords from all my photos, and build a "library" of keywords that I can pick and choose from for tagging future photos?
    Alternatively - if I could export a keyword list from Photoshop Elements (in txt or XML format, whatever) is there a way that I can import that into Aperture?
    From the reading I've done so far, it seems like I have to manually enter keywords on each photo or do a batch update (and, again, manually enter them). I'd much prefer to have a list of keywords that I can scroll down, then just click to select. Is that asking too much of Aperture?

    jtj3 wrote:
    Hi - I'm still a Mac and Aperture noob, so please excuse me if the question is dumb or ill-formed...
    Welcome to the list and Mac's. Don't woory about your questions, veteran Mac and Aperture users here frequently post dumb and ill-formed questions.
    I used to use Photoshop Elements on a PC. I made pretty extensive use of "tags" (keywords, in Aperture lingo) for categorizing my photos. I wrote all the tags into the exif data of my photos, then copied everything over to Aperture.
    Now, when I pull up an existing photo in Aperture browser, I can see the keywords that I already added. Great...but, is there a way to extract all the existing keywords from all my photos, and build a "library" of keywords that I can pick and choose from for tagging future photos?
    I tried what you described to see what would happen. I opened an image in Preview and added a keyword to it (one I was sure wasn't in my Aperture) saved the file and imported into Aperture. The new keyword was bot in the EXIF data field of the image and in Apertures keyword list.
    Are you familiar with the *Keywords HUD* (*Window->Show Keyword HUD*)? If you look there do you see your keywords from your imported images?
    Alternatively - if I could export a keyword list from Photoshop Elements (in txt or XML format, whatever) is there a way that I can import that into Aperture?
    There is a way to import and export keywords see *+Exporting and Importing Keyword Lists+* in the +Aperture Users Manual+ (get to it by *Help->Aperture Help*)
    From the reading I've done so far, it seems like I have to manually enter keywords on each photo or do a batch update (and, again, manually enter them). I'd much prefer to have a list of keywords that I can scroll down, then just click to select. Is that asking too much of Aperture?
    Not at all, ask away (you may not always like the answer )

  • Missing EXIF data after editing picture

    Hi,
    I've noticed that PSE 12 editor no longer writes the EXIF data from the original image.
    I believe this started after upgrading to the most recent version of PSE 12 via Help -> Updates
    Do you have any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Mike
    Before:
    After:

    1/ to answer your question:
    I don't have any user generated tags/kewords/captions on these historical pictures - but normal metadata (camera EXIF data) is showing up fine on flickr.
    2/ I went ahead and tried Jeffery Friedl's Flickr Lightroom publishing plugin - it works well and GPS data is correctly picked up by Flickr.
    so - unless anyone can demonstrate a working adobe flickr publishing setup with gps data I will assume it doesn't work and continue to use jeffery's.
    Thanks
    Bill

  • EXIF data - Why is so much is missing in LRx but in RAW / DNG / CR2 images

    I've seen the limitations in the EXIF data as shown in LR. I've seen the comments that it would be SO useful to sort / filter by all the EXIF data available in LR.
    However LR shows a small proportion of the information that is available in the Meta data but there is missing EXIF data, that is of use to users, not every day, but it is there and with the aforementioned improvement of searching / sorting / grouping / stacking, I'd like this data to be accessible.
    I was looking to find all the correctly exposed images in sets of 3 auto bracketted images -2, 0, +2 from todays shoot but this info is not listed in LR
    So I looked in PhotoGrok, and it told me that the image I was looking at was AEBBracketValue -2, ie 2 stops under exposed in a set of auto bracket.
    It also told me my camera was 37º when I was shooting in Cape Town this morning. It most certainly was not that warm outside.
    My reason for finding the correctly exposed images in the sets was to see if they had sufficient exposure data to be used as one image rather than combining the 3 bracketted images using fusion / enBlend software to rescue the shadow detail and highlight detail in my shoot.
    If you do play with PhotoGrok, you see more info than may be / is / could possibly be useful. But it does list a great deal.
    I do get the basics
    exposure
    aperture
    focal length
    35mm equivalent
    focal distance
    hyperfocal distance
    colour balance
    AEBBracketValue
    and the list goes on.
    More importantly, this data has been extracted by LR from Canon 5DII CR2 files to DNG, so LR can see all this info.
    Anyway, that is my request.
    There is limited EXIF data displayed in LR, there are requests for sorting / searching / listing / stacking by more of the meta data that LR accesses.
    I would like to see much more of this data available to be sorted / searched / stacked, so I can find amongst all the EXIF data, the AEBBracketValue = 0, ie correctly exposed images.
    Rob Cole  - Does your anyfilter access more of this info?
    Hillrdg- you asked me to give my motivations for making suggestions, so I''ve taken your advise on board and to substantiate my argument.
    yes, there is a workaround - It is to sort all the photos by capture time or file number and arrange them into 3 images in a grid view and just select the correct column, but this is slow. More importantly, this request is about vastly improving access to EXIF data and for other uses of the vast amount of EXIF data available in images.
    hamish NIVEN Photography

    EricInsalaco wrote:
    Now I was under the impression Preview/Versions only take up a miniscule space on the HD since they don't FULLY copy the master file, they more create a bridge between the two that amounts to a few MB. Is it possible that it's taking up a much larger amount than intended here (a la the same basic mail attachment problem, but with Preview)? If so, what directory would that be located in?
    Apple's documentation on Versions and what is kept in the Versions database is misleading, in my experience, though others will argue to the contrary.
    In any case, all the Versions files and the database that keeps track of them are in an invisible folder in the root directory called
    .DocumentRevisions-V100
    The easiset way to check its size is to show invisible files by pasting the following command in Terminal:
    defaults write com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles TRUE; killall Finder
    press 'return' on the keyboard.
    Now navigate to the hard disk in Finder and you should see DocumentRevisions and its size.
    To turn off invisible files, use the same command as above but replace TRUE with FALSE.
    Message was edited by: softwater

  • Export of RAW files loses EXIF data

    I am having a problem when I export files out of the PSE Organizer from RAW format to JPG that I am losing EXIF data on the resulting JPG file.
    I am using PSE 6 on Windows Vista and primarily manage my images in RAW format (Nikon D300 NEF) within the Organizer. I am using the latest Adobe Camera RAW plugin ver 5.1 but I have tried this with the last three Camera RAW plugin versions without any difference.
    I typically need to get the RAW NEF images into JPG format to post them to my blog so I normally select several NEF files at once within the Organizer then CTRL-E (or File, Export, As New Files), select JPEG, then Export.
    The resulting JPG file has no EXIF data for the camera (e.g. Camera make, model, f-stop, exposure, etc) that was on the original NEF file. I am determining this by right-click, Properties, Details on the file within Windows explorer.
    Other tests I have done to diagnose this are:
    1. Opening an NEF file in Full Edit mode from the Organizer then doing a File, Save As (JPEG), the missing EXIF data *does* get saved properly. The problem with this approach is that it is not suitable to export hundreds of NEF files.
    2. I downloaded a trial version of PSE 7 and it behaves identically to PSE6 in this test.
    3. I downloaded a trial version of Lightroom 2 and the export feature works properly in this test.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Baden Smith

    My observations of what is happening is exactly what you are seeing with one exception about the XMP update. <br /><br />My reply that I posted about seeing the XMP file being updated was based on the observation that when I did a File > Write Keyword Tag the time and date changed on the XMP file as seen with Windows Explorer. I also looked inside the XMP file with a text editor and saw the updated comments and tags inside. See this section of the XMP file that shows the comments and tags:<br /><br />------------<br /><rdf:Description rdf:about=""<br />    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><br />   <dc:creator><br />    <rdf:Seq><br />     <rdf:li>Baden Smith</rdf:li><br />    </rdf:Seq><br />   </dc:creator><br />   <dc:rights><br />    <rdf:Alt><br />     <rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">Copyright - Baden Smith - All Rights Reserved</rdf:li><br />    </rdf:Alt><br />   </dc:rights><br />   <dc:description><br />    <rdf:Alt><br />     <rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">Fishing boats sailing by our balcony at dawn in Zanzibar</rdf:li><br />    </rdf:Alt><br />   </dc:description><br />   <dc:subject><br />    <rdf:Bag><br />     <rdf:li>Africa</rdf:li><br />    </rdf:Bag><br />   </dc:subject><br />  </rdf:Description><br />------------<br /><br />My original question posted was about the export to JPG and not seeing the camera EXIF info being exported. Do you know if this is configurable or is a bug?<br /><br />Baden

  • How to embed my name within multiple image's EXIF data at once-Bridge CS3

    I've been trying to figure out how to do this for some time and just can't understand how to get my images both Raw and JPEGs to show my name in the EXIF copyright or author entry when entering it in the "File Info" dialog box so it shows up viewing EXIF data using EXIF Viewer or within Bridge CS3.
    Can I get some help on this? Point me to a tutorial or something?
    I've already read Bridge Help and it's worded in such a way that isn't very clear to me on how to do this.
    Thank you for your help on this.

    Let me see if I understand this correctly. That "Digital Workflow 1" pdf told me to uncheck all IPTC boxes which is opposite what you just said.
    You are free to create the workflow that suits you, check or uncheck IPTC in Bridge prefs is only a way to organize the view in the metadata panel, not adding or deleting info from it.
    So I'm suppose to enter my name in the IPTC Contact-"Creator" entry section within the "File Info" dialog box of a selected image/images within Bridge CS3 and check the IPTC boxes in the Metadata section of Bridge's Preferences dialog box to turn them on so my name I entered as "Creator" in "File Info"/IPTC can be seen in the Metadata placard Bridge work space interface but does NOT guarantee my name will be EMBEDED IN THE EXIF of the selected image/images?
    As above, all info you add to IPTC and apply to an image is embedded in the exif and xmp data of that file, no matter if the boxes are checked or unchecked for visibility in metadata panel.
    IOW checking the IPTC boxes in Bridge's Metadata Preferences is just for previewing within Metadata Placard work space interface in Bridge? I'm using Filmstrip view as a Bridge work space BTW.
    Yes. And consider an other workspace for metadata, I attach some screenshots from my workspace I crerated myself in Bridge using the prefs and drag and drop with panels. It is from Bridge CS4 and apart from the top pathbar it is basicly the same as CS3.
    Filmstrip is very nice for sorting with big preview but not the best for adding metadata. You can create as many workspace as you like and you can easily switch between them (in CS3 use the number buttons bottom right.
    To actually embed my name entered as "Creator" in "File Info" IPTC section in a selected image/image's EXIF data I have to apply a custom made template to the image/images already residing on the hard drive and viewed in Bridge OR append the IPTC data within the EXIF of the image/images upon import from camera CF card reader through Bridge's "Get Photos From Camera" drop down menu. Correct?
    Yes, I have choosen for the last option because now all my downloaded files have this template in it and I don't have to bother later. No matter if the files are keepers or not. You only have to create a template once. See also a screenshot from the info I filled to the template but it is up to you what you like to appear in there.
    Another question, what is the difference between the "Description" section where you can enter "Author" (which would be my name) and the IPTC Contact section where you can enter "Creator" (again, my name) both within "File Info" dialog box?
    check this wikipedia info about IPTC:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Press_Telecommunications_Council
    Another question, I just selected a batch of images within a folder in Bridge and tried to create a Metadata Template and it shows a blank box with a statement at the bottom "Only checked properties will be added/changed to this template"...and below this "Properties selected: 0". What and where are checked properties? Does that mean I have to check the IPTC boxes in Bridge's Metadata Preferences?
    Don't know that. You should first create a template without selecting multiple files. After you saved this template select the files you want to change and click on the append template option.
    I have to wonder how and why another photographer would need all this nested clutter to accommodate alternate workflows on something as simple as input/output processing on a batch of images. It's beyond my understanding. This just seems way too complicated to have to sort out. Just my opinion.
    Nothing is ever that simple as it seems....

  • What are the forensic limitations of Metadata & Exif Data+ Adobe Photoshop 3 question; e.g. Metadata

    I have some questions regarding metadata, and exif data on digital   cameras and its forensic limitations in Adobe photoshop 3;
    For  instance; After a picture is taken and has a metadata/exif digital   stamp of the "picture being taken day" under what circumstances can  that  "picture being taken day" be changed?
    Does the picture  being taken day change when you import it into adobe  photoshop 3 and  add a caption?
    Does it change only when the picture is edited,  to perhaps add a white  sidebar that says "family photo" or whatever?
    Under what circumstances does the exif/metadata digital time stamp  of  the "picture being taken day" change?
    Also, is it possible  to change the picture being taken day on a  photograph in adobe  photoshop 3 manually?
    Thanks-
    Phil

    I guess it would be easier to give you an example. The above picture shows the exif data as 9.11.2001. How is this possible if this is a 911 victim? In the top metadata, it says Adobe photoshop 3. I assume this is the program it was last edited in? Or was adobe software used exclusively in cameras back then perhaps? I am not sure, I just know I have many questions I really want answers to. Was the exif data changed perhaps in the above photo on 9.11.2001 to add that white sidebar, which says (Family photo) ?? Click the image below to see the screenshot of what I am looking at, this way we are on the same page or picture so to  speak.
    Any help you can give will be greatly appreciatted...
    Thanks,
    Phil

  • IPhoto '08 loses exif data when exporting RAW to JPG

    I'm using a Canon 40D shooting only RAW. I just recently noticed that when I export to JPG, iPhoto loses quite a bit of important EXIF data, including, aperture info.
    Is this a known issue, or is it something unique to my system?

    I guess I misworded it. I understand that the info doesn't go away or come back. Either there's a problem in both Finder and flickr (I've uploaded the file to flickr.com) where neither finds the info in the jpeg or there's a problem in the way iPhoto writes the EXIF data to the file.
    Today, I downloaded EXIFViewer for an alternate look at the EXIF fields and the aperture data is there according to EXIFViewer. So, now I think the bug may be with flickr. Can't really call it a bug in Finder, since the expected functionality for finder is not to get "aperture info", but "More info."
    In any case, these are the fields in the More Info:
    |RAW:Name_|_RAW:Value_|_JPEG:Name_|_JPEG:Value|
    |Dimensions|2586x3892|Dimensions|2586x3892|
    |Device make|Canon|Device make|Canon|
    |Color space|RGB|Color space|RGB|
    |Profile name|Adobe RGB (1998)|Profile name|Generic RGB Profile|
    |Focal Length|44|Focal Length|44|
    |Alpha channel|0|Alpha channel|0|
    |Red eye|0|Red eye|0|
    |FNumber|4|
    |Exposure|1/60|Exposure|1/60|
    |Last opened|Monday, May 19, 2008 6:31 PM|Last opened|Today, 9:31am|
    And the meta info on flickr is here:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/carloscervantes/2536040124/meta/
    Again, no aperture data in either flickr or Finder.

  • Importing Canon EXIF data into Lightroom

    Hi,
    sorry if this is a stupid question...
    I noticed that when using Canon Image Browser software, that the amount of image information is much more extensive than what I can see in both LR and in Bridge. As an example: In Canon Image Browser I get data for flash exposure compensation, in Bridge and LR I do not have detailed flash information.
    Any suggestions?
    Also, does anybody know if it is planned to add the feature where you can see the AF point(s) (again, I see it in Image Browser, but not in Bridge or LR)
    Thanks,
    VR

    Most Canon's MakerNotes tags are "public secret", which means: there's no official documentation, but everybody knows them :-)
    As FEC info resides in the same (MakerNotes) section as some other info (which is recognised by LR), it shouldn't be difficult for LR to show FEC value too. I believe there could be other problem...
    LR should deliver same infos for all camera brands and maybe FEC value of some other brand isn't so easy to "decode". So, it wouldn't be "fair" if LR would show particular values only for some brand. There's no other reason I can think of.
    In regard of focus points.. I don't miss that info at all -and even Canon's DPP doesn't show them up.
    Bogdan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is Pro Tools 9.0.5 compatible it Mac OS X 10.7.4 Lion?

    Need answers asap

  • XML message without encoding type

    Hi, Is there any possibility to generate the XML file without encoding? Should convert  <?xml version="1.0"; encoding="UTF-8"?> to <?xml version="1.0";?>. I have checked the blog and the answer was either Java mapping or XSLT mapping. Is it possible

  • ITunes stops downloading when other programs are running

    I noticed recently that as soon as I open any other programs while iTunes is running in the background, it stops downloading music. Any suggestions? David

  • Httpd access_log entry - have I been compromised?

    What's going on here? Has my security has been breached? Has someone caused a buffer overflow and then put something on my machine? If so, how could they access my machine? My knowledge state: I do not have a in depth knowledge of security issues - o

  • File structure iPhoto

    Hello forum, is there by any chance sombody reading this forum who might be able to tell whether there is even the slightes chance that iPhoto would change its file structure in order to keep my own finder file structure? iPhoto would be perfect if i