Expected goods receipts

Hi,
Is there any standard report available for the "Expected goods receipts" other than ME2V ?
Regards,
Sattuj

Check ME2M Selection parameters-BEST
scope of list-WE101
Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 28, 2009 11:00 AM

Similar Messages

Goods receipt check box in PO

Hi, I want to flag the goods receipt check box in PO under delivery tab.But in me22n it is showing in non editable mode..please help me how to do it?
Regards
Prabha

Hello Prabha,
After posting a goods receipt or an invoice you cannot change the goods receipt indicator (see note 457511 questions 10 to 12).
It should not be possible to change the the indicators for expected goods receipt or expected invoice receipt after posting follow-on documents.
Being follow-on documents, even if the goods receipt has been cancelled, the "goods receipt indicator" (EKPO_WEPOS) cannot be modified. This is not an error but the standard system behaviour.
There is no customizing setting or tool that you could use inside the standard system to change it. This change should be done as a specific code change.
Regards,

PO, Goods Receipt, & Invoice Variance report

Experts,
      Is there a transaction, report, or tables to build a query that could give me the Purchase Order Value$, Goods Receipt Value$, and Invoice Value$ for a specific time period? I want to find the variance between all three, thanks for your help.

HI
These are some std reports in MM
Materials Management: Procurement and Stock Reports
Logistics Information Reports (Stock)
MCBA     Plant
MCBC     Storage Location
     MCBE     Material
     MCBR     Batches
     MC.9     Material Stock
     MC.A     Material Receipts / Issues
     MC.B     Inventory Turnover u2013 Material
     MC.1     Plant Stock
     MC.2     Plant Receipts / Issues
     MC.3     Plant Inventory Turnover
     MC.5     Stock u2013 Storage Location
     MC.6     Storage Location Receipts / Issues
     MC.7     Storage Location Inventory Turnover
Purchasing Information System
     MCE1     Purchase Group Analysis
     MCE3     Vendor Analysis
     MCE5     Material Groups Analysis
     MCE7     Material Analysis
     MC$G     Material Purchasing Values
MC$I     Material Purchasing Quantities
     MC$O     Material Frequencies
     MC$4     Vendor Purchasing Values
     MC$6     Vendor Purchasing Quantities
     MC$:     Vendor Frequencies
     MC$0     Purchasing Group Values
     MC$2     Purchasing Group Frequencies
     MC$<     Material Group Purchasing Values
     MC$>     Material Group Purchasing Quantities
     MC$E     Material Group Frequencies
Purchasing Reports
     ME80FN     General Analysis of Purchasing Documents
     ME81N     Analysis of Order Values
     ME23N     Display Purchase Order
     ME53N     Display Purchase Requisition
     ME5A     List Display Of Requistions
     ME33L     Display Scheduling Agreement
     ME39     Display Delivery Schedule
     ME43     Display RFQ
     ME4L     List RFQ by Vendor
     ME4M     List RFQ by Material
     ME4S     List RFQ by Collective Number
     ME48     Display Quotation
     ME2L     Purchasing Documents per Vendor
     ME2M     Purchasing Documents per Material
     ME2K     Purchasing Documents by Account Assignment
     ME2W     Purchasing Document by Supplying Plant
     ME2V     Expected Goods Receipts
     MD13     Display Planned Order Single
     MD16     Display Planned Order Collective
Invoice Reports
MB5S     List of GR/IR balances
MIR6     Invoice Overview
MIR4     Display Invoice
MIR5     Display Invoice List
Stock Reports
MMBE     Stock Overview
MB51     Material Document List
MB03     Display Material Document
MB54     Vendor consignment stocks
CO09     Material Availability
MB5C     Batch Where Used Pick Up List

Difference between inbound delivery and Goods Receipt

Can any one explain difference between inbound delivery and goods Receipt??

Hi dear,
Inbound delivery is one confirmation used to indicate the expected goods receipts in advance, so that the related process partners like warehouse personnel , planning personnel can utilise this data for initiation of actions and planning. Also , we can make this confirmation relevant to Planning in the customisation, to enhance the performance.
In general , we need confirmations only as a kind of assurance/information , in absence of the goods.
But if the goods are received physically , obviously we do not need any confirmations , we would perform the goods receipt .
When working with Inbound delivery , the goods receipt is done with respect to specific inbound delivery( though not compulsary to do so) , so that the integration done in the system works to the advantage of the users.

Indicators "goods receipt" "invoice expected" are not set! Bug or feature?

Hi all,
we are using SRM 5.0 classic scenario.
A freetext shopping cart without vendor assignment creates a PR in the backend (4.6C). In this PR the indicators for "goods receipt" and invoice expected" are not set. Is this ab bug or a feature.
In former realeases these indicators are set automatically for the document flow.
What do I have to do to set the indicators automatically in SRM 5.0.
Best regards
Susanne

Hello,
in classic scenario those flags are set according to the account assignment type and the settings in backend transaction OME9. On the one hand these settings can be overruled by BADI(s), on the other hand this behavior has also been noticed due to a malfunction which was corrected with note 1175255
(pls also take into account the corrections for the backend!).
I hope this is a first approach for solving the issue.
BR
Michael Haslinger

Goods Receipt and Serial Numbers

I'm getting the following error "[IGN1.WhsCode][line: 1] , 'This entry already exists in the following tables (ODBC -2035)'" when trying to add a goods receipt document containing a single item that is serial number managed via the DI API. We are running against Business One version 2005A SP01 PL9. The Goods Receipt PO transaction is reporting the same error. The Goods Issue and Delivery transaction appeared to work correctly. The Goods Receipt transaction posted correctly when created in the B1 Client (GUI) application. So it is an issue with the DI API. We are using the SBODemo_US company database but we added a new item and configured it for serial number management. This same code works with B1 2004A. Our application is suppose to work with both versions of B1, so our application is built with version 2004A DI API. Should this work, or do I need to use the 2005A version of the DI API when communicating with a 2005A system? Would this version of the DI API work correctly with a 2004A system?
Thanks,
Jason Eiler

I remembered encountering the same problem working with B1 2004A. For the Goods Receipt and Goods Receipt PO documents, when receiving items that are serial managed I would fill in the InternalSerialNumber data member of the Document Lines Serial Numbers object. The fix was I also had to provide some value for the SystemSerialNumber field. I just always set it to a value of 1. In B1 2005A, this issue must have been resolved, because when I commented out this line of code, the document was added successfully. I don't have to provide a SystemSerialNumber, the system must generate one, as I would expect.

PO valueless that goods receipt value once Invoice verification is done

HI Gurus,
I
have created a PO for Value 2500 with Account assignment F (Order), done Invoice verification for value 2500. Then I have changed this line item value to 1500 in POand then tried doing Goods receipt against the PO. This way I was expecting system to throw an error at the tiem of GR but it posted GR successfully that too for an value of 2500 without giving an error or any message system should not post 2500 value as PO value at the time of GR was 1500 or it should have posted a GR for value 1500.
Pls assist me in understanding the system behavior.
Thank you in advance.
Regards
Nilesh

I guess you need to ristrict changing value for PO line item if Invoice verification is done that will solve lot many problems

Transaction BORGR: No tolerance on goods receipt for Kanban calloff

Hello,
we have the following situation:
- MM scheduling agreement with tolerance of 10% for under and overdelivery, production supply "summarized JIT call" is set.
- KANBAN cycle has 1 empty container with a summarized JIT call for replenishment, quantity 10 pieces.
- ASN has been created with BORGR transaction, it contains: 1 line item for the material with delivery quantity 9 pieces, assigned to this line item is the JIT call with notified quantity 9 pieces as well.
My expectation was that the JIT call can be booked with 9 pieces as it is inside the 10% tolerance defined for the scheduling agreement. In addition, I expected the KANBAN container be set to full.
Instead, the following error message is given:
'Post GR' carried out without success
(Message no. BORGR215)
Because of previous error, dispatching is not possible for ID 0180573431
(Message no. /SPE/ID_HANDLING011)
Inbound Delivery 0180573431 00010
(Message no. BORGR210)
Total of the summarized JIT calls does not match the current delivery qty
(Message no. BORGR540)
Changing the delivery quantity and the notified JIT quantity to 10 pieces, the goods receipt is booked correctly.
I only found the following notes that deal with tolerances but they are outdated, as we are using DIMP release 603:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/393421
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/508215
Has anybody faced a similar problem or can help me with this?
Thanks!

Hello Jiaul,
Sorry I may have mislead you. The actual error message is "Goods Receipt for Production Order XXXX can only be made on 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27". These two dates are the Start Date and FInish Date for the Production Order in CO03,
The Basic Start Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.25
The Basic Finish Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.27
I think what it means is that you can only Post Goods Receipt for the Production Order only after the Basic Start Date of the Production Order. Do you know where I can find the configuration for this message?
Thanks

"Delivery Completed" Indicator in Goods Receipt

Hi,
While doing GR, we want to check the "Delivery Completed" on the Goods Receipt Screen if we are expecting no future receipt against the Purchase Order.
Currently we are not able to check the Delivery Completed Indicator as it is not in editable mode.
Is there any issue if we enable the Check Box on Goods Receipt Screen. If no, how can we enable the Check Box.
Please guide.
Regards,

Hi
This is handled by the system automatically. you can change only in purchase order.
Refer SAP note 1093582 for more info
About delivery completed indicator functionality
The purchase order item is considered closed, even though the total
quantity may not have been delivered.
o Although a further delivery is not expected, it is still possible.
o At the time of the next goods receipt, the system suggests the item
as unselected.
o The purchase order item can be deleted, even if the total quantity
was not delivered.
Although the "delivery completed" indicator is not set, a purchase order
item is still considered closed if the full quantity has been delivered. In
this case, the "delivery completed indicator" is not required.
In Customizing for Inventory Management/Goods Receipt/Set Delivery
Completed Indicator, you can define at plant level that the "delivery
completed indicator" is set automatically in the order if:
o the total quantity was delivered
o the underdelivery or overdelivery lies within the tolerances
Hope it helps
Thanks/karthik

AFS ARUN goods receipt future allocation

I'm not able to test a future allocation all the way through for our current setup.
I allocated an order to future PO and Create an inbound delivery for PO. At this point /afs/md04 is allocated (R) to stock type 'L'. When I do the Goods receipt against the Inbound delivery, /afs/md04 remains the same. I was expecting that the order would be allocated to Batch stock.
When I do a good receipt using MIGO against a PO, then it does work correctly - it changes the allocation from PO to batch stock. When I do a goods receipt using MIGO against an Inbound Delivery or execute Goods receipt using VL32N, it does not - We use VL32N to Goods Receipt.
Even after doing subsequent allocation against the order requirement using the stanard allocation, I get the message 'no open schedule lines found'.

Hello Carol,
might be too late, but is it possible that your stock is (was) stuck in quality inspection?
KR,
Peter

Standard Goods Receipt PO resulting in odd Journal Entries

I posted a Goods Receipt PO which inculded quantity 3 of an item that is $77.60.
Normally, this should create a Journal Entry where Inventory gets debited $7760x3=$232.80 and the allocation Account (GOODS RECEIVED NOT INVOICED) on the credit side for the same amount (232.80).
However this time the resulting JE
(1) credited GOODS RECEIVED NOT INVOICED for the expected amount (price x quantity = 232.80)
(2) also credited COGS for $1472.37 and
(3) debited inventory by $1705.17 (the expected $232.80, plus the unexpected $1472.37).
Why is the $1472.37 included in this transaction at all - it should have only credited GOODS RECEIVED NOT INVOICED and debited INVENTORY both by $232.80.
We use FIFO. We do allow negative inventory, however this inventory item was not in negative quantity.
thanks!
Geoff

Gordon, thanks
When you say "the cost posted would be the earliest inventory for those items" what do you mean?
I understand that if I posted an AR Invoice , the COGS would be calculated from the oldest available layer, or if the item had a negative quantity on hand, it would have posted the price difference between those transactions that caused the inventory to go negative and the actual price once a transaction occurred that brought the inventory to zero / positive. Or if there is a difference in price between a GRPO and AP Invoice, the difference is allocated to the Price Difference Account.
However in a normal GRPO inventory should be debited, and Goods Received Not Invoiced (allocation account) credited... Why is there a JE to to any other accounts period?
What circumstances could cause these?.
Prior to this GRPO, the inventory audit showed the item at 70 on hand, $670 cumulative value. After the GRPO (on which the GRPO Total is $232.80), the inventory audit says 88 on hand and $2375.34 in cumulative value. This doesn't make sense

Packaging material is not appearing in the Goods receipt of STPO

Dear All,
We are currently dealing one Roll-Out project for one multinational company. In that from sales side, one of the main processes defined is u201CStock Transport Purchase Order processu201D. As a regular process, outbound delivery document also created with ref to STPO.
As per the client requirement the u201CPackaging materialu201D needs to be added as additional line item in the delivery to calculate the packaging cost. This packaging material is a "Stockable and Valuated" material. So while performing the PGI the stock will get reduced from SD side.
The problem is, using this same STPO delivery document the Goods receipt is planned to do in the another side of company code. while doing the Goods receipt system is displaying only the "Finished Product" only. The packaging material is not displaying while doing the goods receipt in the another company code.
due to this we are not able to complete our test cycle.
so we need the expert opinion to solve this issue.
if the packaging material is added as additional line item while doing Goods receipt then, the problem is solved.
Kindly suggest us...
Regards,
MANI
frWe have customized that also and now u201CPackaging materialu201D is adding as a new line item in the delivery document as a non valuated material.
But the issue is, the Billing type u201CZICu201D is not getting determined while creation of billing if u201CPackaging materialu201D is added as a new line item. If u201CPackaging materialu201D is not added as a line item then, billing type is getting determined automatically without any issue.
We have checked in LIKP table, its containing the billing type as u201CZICu2019. But if packaging material is added then, the billing type determination is not happening.
We are assuming that some customizing needs to be done from MM/SD point of view. I am seeking the experts help regarding this issue to solve the problem.
Regards,
MANI

Dear Friends,
Thanks for the Feedback.
Even though it is a associated company, in one company code the packaging material stock was reduced and packed for the STPO shipment.
After receiving the consignment, in the receiving company code they will perform the goods receipt with ref to "Outbound Delivery" document.
Since in the outbound delivery document "Packaging material" also available. So as a business strategy we are expecting the same "packaging material" also should available for goods receipt.
I hope i have explained with max of my knowledge to clear your doubt.

LE-TRA Shipment costs as inbound delivery costs, goods receipt

Hello gurus:
We are facing the following scenario, regarding inbound transportation.
We plan our shipment document and shipment costs, and they feature several items. Each of those items represent a shipping service, which in certain cases be taken on different countries by the same service agent.
That is, we have a service X on country A, with tax indicator 1, and service Y on country B, with tax indicator 2.
Both services would need to be transferred as delivery costs to the purchase order.
According to note 427944, shipment cost value is cumulated by service agent., so that it looks impossible to get the values broken up to the purchase order, which would be the first step to subsequently get the right tax indicators for each item of the shipment.
Even using different condition types on the shipment cost document, system cumulates by service agent and transfers to the first condition found on the purchase order schema.
Has any of you faced similar issue? Any workaround possible?.
Thanks in advance for your valuable help.
David Ramos.
PORCELANOSA MM.
This is the section of note 427944 that indicates the treatment of the shipment costs in the purchase order,
Transfer the shipment costs into the condition types of the purchase order:
The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents
for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item.
Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment
cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of
condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always
belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not
'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is
marked as 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order
item before the goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents,
several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition
lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines
are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
- Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for
the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema
must have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines
exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are
missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in
the purchase order.
- Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Message was edited by: PORCELANOSA MM

Hi,
If you refereed the OSS Note 427944 correctly it explains how the shipment cost can be transferred to delivery cost based on some pre-requisite.
Like the value for PO should be >0
Like the service agent is involved during shipment liability, then there should be cumulative transfer for each value which will update based on shipment cost if PO value is "0".
The shipment cost will be delivered to all delivery items based on weight.
If you want to enhance this then you need to use the enhancement V54KSFRC to update the values as per your requirement.
Rgds,

Goods Issue based on Goods receipt.

Hello,
Can any body suggest query on "Goods Issue based on Goods receipt."
Scenario :
Suppose P.O has been created @10/- for 100 Quantity . GR has done for 100/-in Month of June, now another P.O has created @12/- for 100 Quantity in Month of July and GR done for the same , I want to Isuue Goods in Month of july and expect system should take price of @10/- for first 100 Quantity and @12/- for the rest quantity.
Could you advise.?
Thanks & Regards
Sudhansu

Hi,
For FIFO Configuration,
1. Ensure FIFO is active tcode OMWE
2. FIFO maintained at company code or plant level T code: MRLH
3. Movement type settings for FIFO T code OMW4
4. Preparation of FIFO in MMR T code: MRF4
5. Run the FIFO valuation T code MRF1

PO under Confirm Goods Receipt/Services Performed

Hi Gurus,
We are currently under SRM5.0 using classic scenario. Last year we had our technical upgrade from SP4 to SP12.
The scenario is that a requestor did the PO confirmation per line item level and has been approved and posted backend. However, he can still view the PO under Confirm Goods Receipt/Services Performed screen. He then tried to create another confirmation but this time warning message "PO XXXXXX contains no items for confirmation" occured while creating confirmation.
Before the upgrade, requestor is claiming that once confirmation has been approved, they will no longer see the PO under Confirm Goods Receipt/Services Performed screen since no more action is required on their part.
Kindly advise if the behaviour is due to the recent upgrade from SP4 to SP12.
Thanks.
Jho Sotoya

Hello Joanna Marie,
Some points to check (if not done):
- is method BBP_WF_LIST from BAdI BBP_WF_LIST implemented ?
- are PO items concerned have flag "No further confirmations expected" set or not (i think it is set because you have pop-up error message),
- is parameter 'Delivery Completed Ind. not set' unset for report BBP_GET_STATUS_2 ?
Regards.
Laurent.

Expected goods receipts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for